Media: ZRPK "Shell-S1" of the Haftar army shot down a MiG-23UB fighter near Tripoli

43
The air defenses of the Libyan National Army, under the leadership of Marshal Khalifa Haftar, managed to bring down the MiG-23UB fighter belonging to the forces supporting the government of national consensus based in Tripoli. This is reported by the press service of the LNA, the corresponding recording and video was posted in Twitter

Media: ZRPK "Shell-S1" of the Haftar army shot down a MiG-23UB fighter near Tripoli




According to reports, the PNS fighter was shot down by an anti-aircraft defense system, the downed aircraft crashed near the town of Tarhun in 80 km from the Libyan capital Tripoli. It is alleged that both fighter pilots died, previously they served as instructor pilots at the flight academy in Misrata. At the crash site, fragments of an aircraft with markings of the National Accord Government (PNS) were found.

What kind of air defense system shot down the plane, not reported. Earlier, the Mirage F1 PNS fighter, operated by an American pilot, was shot down using the Kvadrat SAM system. However, this time, reports appeared on the Net and some Arab media that the PNS plane was shot down by the Russian anti-aircraft missile system “Pantsir-S1”, supplied by the Libyan National Army Haftar allies from the United Arab Emirates. About the delivery of the "Shell" was reported about two weeks ago, he arrived in Libya on board the C-17A Air Force UAE.

"Military Review" previously reported that the PZIR-C 1 air defense system was seen in Libya. You can read more in the material: In Libya, noted ZRPK "Pantsir-S 1"

Representatives of the PNS recognize the loss of their aircraft from the fire of Haftar’s army’s air defense weapons, but claim that they shot down not MiG-23UB, which is in a single copy, but a light attack aircraft from the Czechoslovak production L-39ZO. Some military experts agree with this statement who saw the Czechoslovak attack aircraft in the remnants of the downed aircraft, and not the Soviet fighter.

Recall that the Libyan National Army, commanded by Marshal Khalifa Haftar, supported by the Libyan parliament, launched an offensive against the Libyan capital Tripoli from April 4 in order to capture and overthrow the government of national accord supported by the UN and some European countries. Fights go with varying success.


43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    5 July 2019 15: 18
    A war without end ...
    1. +10
      5 July 2019 15: 26
      The first plane shot down by Pantsir. And if I understand correctly the alignment in Libya, then how would the "good" have brought down the "bad"
      1. +18
        5 July 2019 16: 40
        Quote: maxim947
        The first plane shot down by Pantsir. And if I understand correctly the alignment in Libya, then how would the "good" have brought down the "bad"

        the first was a Turkish phantom near Syria. then the Saudis flunked their own helicopter. This Albatross will be the third
        1. +2
          5 July 2019 17: 33
          Here it is))) thanks for the remark
      2. +17
        5 July 2019 17: 20
        Clear business, who brought down, that and good. There Satan’s leg will break. Today some are good, tomorrow others)))
      3. nks
        -7
        6 July 2019 09: 17
        Quote: maxim947
        And if I understand correctly the alignment in Libya, then how would the "good" have brought down the "bad"

        Not. Haftar arrived in Libya directly from the states, and an internationally recognized government arrived in Tripoli. And the fact that Putin Haftaru, along with the states, etc. also throws up weapons, is why he is a huckster without honor.
        1. +3
          6 July 2019 16: 05
          in Tripoli, the government, elected not by the people, but by Western "partners", of course, it's a sin not to recognize your sixes
          1. nks
            +1
            6 July 2019 18: 55
            The partners there were mostly eastern, and it was recognized on the basis of UN Security Council resolution 2259, for which the Russian Federation also voted.
      4. +3
        6 July 2019 20: 16
        Where are the "good"
      5. -1
        12 July 2019 19: 58
        Quote: maxim947
        The first plane shot down by Pantsir. And if I understand correctly the alignment in Libya, then how would the "good" have brought down the "bad"

        Downed by our Turks plane, the alignment is heavy they knock us down and we give them the C400, for what ??? It seems that we are purely divorced, are we suckers ??? Or suckers aren't we ??? A grater by PAPAPAAA AIUMERIKANO
    2. +5
      5 July 2019 15: 29
      Yeah, they fight both in modern complexes and in old people like T 55
    3. +13
      5 July 2019 15: 32
      L-39, not MiG-23
    4. TTX
      +19
      5 July 2019 16: 41
      Quote: knn54
      A war without end ...

      That's right .. But the country was stable and socially protected and what it turned into, like IRAQ ... The West is spreading death and destruction and Russia does not allow peace in Syria to be established.
    5. +2
      5 July 2019 18: 07
      "The Revolution has a beginning,
      The Revolution has no end! "

      Lyrics of Ivan Baranov
    6. +1
      7 July 2019 14: 50
      As long as the money is in circulation, the wars will not stop, alas ...
  2. +4
    5 July 2019 15: 21
    Here and there our "Shells" were marked! And, this experience of their operation, our specialists will carefully study and analyze, so that there are fewer problems with the service, and with practical application in battles.
  3. +5
    5 July 2019 15: 21
    The radiant Jydai sow the eternal, good in all regions where they can reach. Even after their departure, blood has been pouring for years.
  4. +5
    5 July 2019 15: 24
    Please do not evaluate the question, but essentially answer. Who is there for whom? Who do we support, and who are the Americans? Or are we supporting Khalifa Haftar there? I do not understand anything. Please explain.
    1. +4
      5 July 2019 15: 27
      Representatives of Haftar came to the Russian Federation for consultations and negotiations, probably we drown for him)))
      1. +6
        5 July 2019 15: 39
        Sarrange also rested in Moscow, drank seagulls with Lavrov. AND?




        The question is, who did not drink tea with anyone, but who depended on whom:
        Tripoletans are completely dependent on the Sultan. There, even part of the groups was thrown out, when Haftaru was trampled in the war - the pro-Turkish Islamists shoved all other Islamists, uncomfortable, they rule in fact the Muslim Brothers of the Libyan flood. France - more morally and helps on Twitter. Turks - confirmed equipment, UAVs, complex systems. Probably military specialists. Right now, there are unloading whole 3 ships with snacks.


        Haftar - UAE is the main sponsor in terms of money and equipment (armored personnel carriers, armored vehicles, anti-tank systems, including Javelins, various ammunition for artillery, including guided, UAVs including drums and armor) + probably military specialists. Friend and Field Marshal Sisi - Egypt officially provides assistance in training the LNA, handed over to the MiG-21 squadron, part of the tanks from storage, guns, various other equipment from stocks.
        1. +2
          5 July 2019 18: 52
          Three days ago, the Turks (TV) reported that the Haftar people had left some positions and fled, leaving new armor for the vehicles received from the UAE.The main find was inside these vehicles, a few pieces of the brand new Javelin ATGMs, which hinted that they were already in the hands of the Turkish company Roketsan. Prior to this, despite the fact that Turkey is a member of NATO, the United States still did not sell these systems to the Turks. Apparently the UAE sold it, and they transferred it to Haftar and he pr..l there.
          1. +6
            5 July 2019 19: 06
            So the article was on Topwar. There, still guided Chinese shells were bombarded through the UAE and Haftar.



            But there was a continuation. Haftar amid the rout of his troops. Which with a high share (and they said so to the media - Turkey invaded Libya from air, land and water) was provided with Turkish planning, UAVs and military experts. Crazed and arrested 6 Turks. Turkish Foreign Ministry officially replied:
            Turkish Foreign Ministry: The detention in Libya by illegal Haftar 6 Turkish citizens is an act of banditry and piracy.

            Sultan Erdogan in China said simpler:
            We look forward to the immediate release of our citizens. Otherwise, Haftar’s forces will become legitimate targets..

            Haftar flew on his Falcon to the Emirates:


            Emirates are actively building up support; they have already delivered the latest Chinese strike UAVs and Armor.


            Well, the Haftar Generals for the media say that the Turks are now targets:
            "Turkey has directly intervened in the Battle of Tripoli by sea, air and land- he said. - She provided air cover during the rebel invasion of Garyan. Turkey participates in battles, providing strength and equipment"."Turkish targets in Libya are hostile targets. The army will decisively respond to this aggression", - stressed al-Mismari at a press conference, which was broadcast by Arab satellite TV channels.
            1. 0
              5 July 2019 19: 57
              I think that Saudi Arabia does not support Haftar directly, but through the UAE and Egypt, so that Turkey does not in turn cut off the supply through its territory of the pro-Saudi Jebhat-en-Nusra in Idlib province. And it seems that Saudi Arabia has nothing to do with it. Well, it’s also dangerous for Turkey to hide completely in Libya behind the PNS, near Egypt with its powerful army, and Turkey is far from Libya. In general, in the Arab world, one can thus gain the fame of another enemy like Iran.
            2. -4
              6 July 2019 01: 03
              Okay guys, nothing is lost. Remember Assad at the end of 2015 also controlled 20% territory. Remember the Korean War - the Pusan ​​perimeter and the Incheon landing force.

              In short, as we land in the rear of the troops Haftar such as Tobruk, Benghazi, Sirt. We will ask Assad to allocate three mechanized battalions to capture bridgeheads and then reinforce them by transferring troops from the territory controlled by PNS. We expand the bridgeheads and cut the supply lines and crush the troops of Khaftar into several groups isolated from each other.

              The operation is supported by the task force of the Black Sea Fleet in the Mediterranean Sea by launching missile strikes against targets along the coast. Mainly on the swathed command posts demoralizing and disorganizing the enemy.
              1. +1
                6 July 2019 20: 20
                the plan is good. One hitch - where will Assad take 3 mechanized battalions?
                1. +1
                  8 July 2019 05: 37
                  As where? He has several mechanized brigades under arms trained by our advisors and battle-hardened. Have you not followed the course of the fighting? Summer / Autumn 2017 - the defeat of the igilovtsy in the desert west of the Euphrates. Winter / Spring 2018 - Operation Olive Branch defeat the pro-Western opposition. Classic maneuver war! Highlight the 3 battalion if that ...
        2. -2
          6 July 2019 00: 32
          How cruelly wrong I was in Haftar! Well, an artist! All this pro-Russian rhetoric is just dust in your eyes!

          Supporting the Emirates is the same as the United States! The UAE’s petroleum sector is half controlled by American oil consortia!

          Yes, well we Americans pinned! Beautiful nothing to say! Ehhhhh
    2. +5
      5 July 2019 15: 28
      It seems like "we" are for Haftar ..
      And the West for the government of national consensus ..

      PS .. so for us it's like how good news should be counted ..))
      1. +2
        5 July 2019 18: 12
        Quote: Roman070280
        It seems like "we" are for Haftar ..
        And the West for the government of national consensus ..

        This is very conditional. In fact, Western military experts from PMCs are fighting for Haftar (at least before), for example, so everything is very ambiguous.
    3. +7
      5 July 2019 15: 30
      Who is there for whom?

      It would be logical that the United States for the power that they put in Libya after the death of Gaddafi, we are for those who are trying to overthrow it
    4. +1
      5 July 2019 15: 44
      Quote: Shuttle
      Please explain

      In my opinion no one understands. East is a delicate matter.
    5. +4
      5 July 2019 19: 02
      We do not openly support anyone there, but given the fact that "the government of national accord is supported by the UN (read the USA) and some European countries", informally we are on the side of Haftar. For him, France is drowning, because the mattresses and the British want to lay their paws on all Libyan oil, not allowing additional applicants to this pie. A couple of years ago, the British frowned menacingly: - "We warn the Russian bear not to stick his paws into Libya," to which Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu said - "What do they have on their coat of arms? It seems like a tiger? So let them know, that not every cat is allowed to point out something to the bear "(not literally, but something like that). With the beginning of the fighting for the city, the American military left Tripoli and disowned the fact that NATO forces were directly involved in the conflict on the side of Saraja, but a month and a half ago, the Haftarites shot down a plane of the forces of national accord and captured a pilot who turned out to be a citizen of one of the European countries ( either a Belgian or a Dutchman - I won't tell you at once, but one of two things), which confirmed that the war in Libya has NATO support. Well, Turkey is strongly harnessed there on the side of Saraja, against the forces of Haftar, which clearly complicates the process of capturing Tripoli. Something like this..
    6. +1
      5 July 2019 23: 26
      Saraj is supported by Turks, Qatars and Italians. Haftara - French, Saudi, Emirates and Egypt. Turks and emirates are fighting against each other almost openly. Our relations are better with Haftar - or rather, with Egypt, which sponsors it and the emirates. Egypt is one of the main buyers of our wheat, plus orders for weapons, medicines, and equipment have gone. But we don’t want to quarrel with the Turks - the Turks are important to us. We are officially pigeons of the world and are friends with everyone. Unofficially, we are closer to Haftar and the oil that he controls. request
    7. 0
      6 July 2019 09: 29
      Quote: Shuttle
      Who is there for whom? Whom do we support, and whom do the Americans support? Or are we there supporting this Khalifa Haftar together? I don’t understand anything. Please explain.

      "Eh-phiopia, one might say, they broke pots from Somalia between themselves? They beat them. Well, what do you think we are on? The arithmetic is simple, comrades. Somalia? Only three. So it should be clear on whose side we are. We are always on the side of the democratic majority. "(C) A. Pokrovsky" My "Minsk"
  5. +2
    5 July 2019 15: 50
    In the Arab media and all sorts of twitter we are talking about a downed L-39ZO

  6. 0
    5 July 2019 16: 28
    Quote: maxim947
    then how would the "good" knock down the "bad"

    there are no good ones, but Haftar is supported by the majority.
    1. 0
      5 July 2019 16: 56
      Most of Libya is behind the Havtor. And its neighboring Egypt and the UAE support it, which means Saudi Arabia. The PNS supports Turkey and Qatar, that is, the Muslim Brotherhood party that were in power in Egypt under Mursi. Turkey actually fights for influence in the Arab world with Saudi Arabia, just as Iran is fighting for an Arab street with Saudi Arabia in the same Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and so on.
  7. 0
    5 July 2019 17: 23
    Quote: Shuttle
    Please do not evaluate the question, but essentially answer. Who is there for whom? Who do we support, and who are the Americans? Or are we supporting Khalifa Haftar there? I do not understand anything. Please explain.

    If the complex came from the Saudis, then I think this is bad.
    1. +1
      5 July 2019 18: 10
      Emirates! She and the Saudis, too, graters are not small. E.Ya. He said more than once that the devil’s leg would break there and they all sold each other for not expensive
  8. 0
    5 July 2019 22: 16
    Yeah............
  9. 0
    5 July 2019 22: 31
    Interestingly, how do our people look at the transfer of equipment to third parties? In theory, this should be agreed between Abu Dhabi and Moscow.
    1. 0
      6 July 2019 09: 34
      Quote: ButchCassidy
      Interestingly, how do our people look at the transfer of equipment to third parties? In theory, this should be agreed between Abu Dhabi and Moscow.

      It is necessary to raise and compare the dates of delivery of the air defense system to the Emirates and the arrival of the Haftar delegation to Moscow, as well as the subsequent contacts of the representatives of the air defense system manufacturer with the Emirate customers. If the arrival was after deliveries, then the transfer of the air defense system to the Libyans was agreed.
  10. +1
    6 July 2019 12: 34
    UB? So this is a training airplane about two places ...
    And L-29, 39 - training ...
    No fighting ones?