Tehran introduced its own air defense system

86
At a ceremony in Tehran, Iranian Defense Minister, Brigadier General Amir Khatami, presented the national air defense system.





The Iranian air defense system was officially handed over to the Iranian Air Force at a ceremony held in Tehran. The system is called "Hodad-15".

Commenting on this event, Brigadier General Amir Khatami said that the new air defense system is integrated with the Sayad 3 long-range missiles and is capable of bearing various types of targets, including military aircraft and UAVs within 150 kilometers, and is able to track them at a distance of 120 kilometers.

In addition, according to the Minister, “Hordad-15” is capable of detecting subtle air targets within 85 radius of kilometers, and knock them down within 45 radius of kilometers. Among other things, the new air defense system is capable of simultaneously intercepting 6 targets. Khatami added that the complex can be deployed in less than 5 minutes.



The system is able to intercept 6 targets simultaneously.


The general said that the air defense system is equipped with a radar with a phased antenna array and independent launch sites. It can effectively work against a variety of types of air targets, including reconnaissance aircraft, bombers, and tactical military aircraft.

The maximum height of the new system - 27 kilometers, radius - 75. It is worth noting that Iranian military experts and technical specialists in recent years have achieved some success in manufacturing a wide range of domestic equipment, but the capabilities of these systems are severely limited by the sanctions imposed on Iran and often correspond to the weapons systems of the 70-80 type.

Iran claims that its military power does not pose a threat to the countries of the region, emphasizing that the defense doctrine of the Islamic Republic is completely based on deterrence.

Saudi Arabia accuses Iran of terrorism


Earlier, King Saudi Arabia Salman accused Tehran of supporting "terrorist armed groups "in the Middle East", As well as in"threats to global oil supply and regional security". This was reported 1 June news agency RIA News.

Riyadh also finds the Islamic Republic guilty of attacking an 4 oil tanker in the Persian Gulf. The same point of view is shared by the United States, which last year terminated the so-called. "Nuclear deal" and imposed a package of sanctions on Iran.

5 June The UAE, Norway and Saudi Arabia in a joint statement addressed to the UN Security Council, presented their own conclusions regarding the incident. Without mentioning Iran directly, the countries noted that the coordination and the level of training of the attackers indicate that the attack was most likely organized by a government entity.
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    9 June 2019 18: 19
    More will be shot down American and Israeli aircraft of different! Well done Iranians !!!
    1. +7
      9 June 2019 18: 22
      Yes, well done, of course .. Just not "Hodad" odnom.Tam need a layered air defense system.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        10 June 2019 06: 42
        Here is an incomprehensible moment. Throwing enemy or the truth that Russia refused to sell S-400 to Iran. I don’t know ... But if the truth is, then Israel rules request
      3. -2
        10 June 2019 10: 06
        Quote: 210ox
        Yes, well done, of course .. Just not "Hodad" odnom.Tam need a layered air defense system.

        Iranians Dmitry I think in the course that will save them ...! Here the layout is very tricky to see, we did it in Hebrew .. Direct deliveries, too much noise and sanction .. They put them to see the designer, and they themselves came up with the appearance! Great move Russia ..
        So far we have to dodge, otherwise BV Khan and then we will not be sick. hi
    2. +3
      9 June 2019 18: 23
      To do this, you still need to fix the mass production. And so commendable that in such conditions they could make this technique.
      1. +13
        9 June 2019 19: 33
        It is respectable that Iran is not engaged in "total" copying like China or simply "screwdriver" assembly like India. Yes, it buys equipment. But gradually, slowly, it replaces it with its own. The country strives for "self-development", in contrast, for example , from the Saudis ...
        1. +1
          10 June 2019 03: 49
          Quote: knn54
          It is respectable that Iran is not engaged in "total" copying ...

          Well, maybe not "total", but copying is "inspired"! For example, the Iranian clone "Hawk" - SAM "Mersad" ... In the 90s (?) A plant for the production of T-72 tanks was delivered to Iran ... In the new tank developments of Iran, "many experts" clearly "see" traces of "T-72/90" ... although, the Iranians do not shun American developments, and parts of the M48, M60 tanks ...
      2. +12
        9 June 2019 19: 37
        Quote: SERGEY SERGEEVICS
        To do this, you still need to fix the mass production. And so commendable that in such conditions they could make this technique.

        The union lived for 70 years in such conditions, and if it hadn’t helped everyone indiscriminately and paid attention to the needs of people, they would still be living.
    3. -4
      9 June 2019 20: 32
      It can be seen, not in vain, that our Persians refused to supply S-400. The Persians established their own production process chain.
      "And the sheep are safe and the wolves are full."
      I will change it, "while the wolves are still intact, the sheep turn gray and arm themselves."
    4. +3
      9 June 2019 22: 15
      If I were you, I wouldn’t make such statements. Israel has long moved to the tactics of using aviation from the zone of inaccessibility for enemy air defenses using gliding munitions capable of striking, capable of flying 100 km or more and hitting a target, as well as drones, including strike ones.

      If Israel wants to strike at Iran, they will do so without much difficulty. In the first line, drones will be launched, some will detect targets, others will strike together with the aircraft, which will simply arrange an infernal carousel by launching waves from planning bombs on reconnoitered drones. Mixing everything into dust.

      To oppose Israel, it is not enough for Iran to have an air defense system of the level of the Russian "Buk", it needs other complexes, not mobile where radars, launchers and a crew are in one box, but TOWED where a command post with a crew is separate from several launchers and several radars. Such a modular air defense system will allow connecting several launchers and air defense systems to one command post and protect the crew in the event of a raid on the air defense system and the defeat of its individual elements, and this will give additional points to courage. Spotting a camouflaged launcher is much more difficult than a launcher after a missile launch or an emitting radar. So, in such a towed air defense system, the crew will survive more often, even with the complete defeat of the air defense system

      Towed-modular air defense systems will be able to introduce additional PUs and radars into battle as needed, and restore combat effectiveness even after the defeat of part of the systems, which will come as a surprise to the enemy.

      And mobile air defense systems should be as an operational reserve, in case of strengthening of a certain direction or during an offensive to accompany and support their troops.
      1. 0
        10 June 2019 00: 09
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        it is not enough to have an air defense system of the level of the Russian "Buk", here we need other complexes, not mobile where radar, launcher and crew are in one box, but TOWED where the command post with the crew is separate from several launchers and several radars

        ) I would smoke smoked on your beech
  2. +2
    9 June 2019 18: 22
    I wonder how many circuit solutions tore off the S-300?
    1. +11
      9 June 2019 19: 00
      The rocket from the S-300 TPK is first thrown up, then leaves on target. The photo shows the start with an inclined guide, i.e. This is not a copy of the S-300.
      1. 0
        9 June 2019 19: 07
        A rocket doesn't care where to start.
        Put the S-300 missile in an inclined container, turn off the declination system and voila!
        From an inclined container is easier. Turned on the march and that's it!
        1. +7
          9 June 2019 19: 37
          Quote: Victor_B
          A rocket doesn't care where to start.
          Put the S-300 missile in an inclined container, turn off the declination system and voila!
          From an inclined container is easier. Turned on the march and that's it!

          That's just the inclined container should be tilted towards the enemy ...
          1. +1
            10 June 2019 00: 16
            Quote: Vol4ara
            That's just the inclined container should be tilted towards the enemy ...

            did you come up with it yourself, or did you read it in the magazine "Radio" for 70 years? not necessary now, but directed ones are easier to implement
        2. +1
          9 June 2019 20: 35
          By the way, the photo in the news is small, but you can see 4 containers per chassis, launch at an angle:
          https://en.mehrnews.com/news/146206/Iran-unveils-advanced-air-defense-system

          Those. for six escorted targets, they need three cars, based on the consumption of two missiles per target. Starting at an angle to the vertical is a different principle for building an air defense system than in the S-300.
      2. +1
        11 June 2019 20: 01
        Visually, it’s very similar to the Patriot. winked
        1. 0
          11 June 2019 20: 31
          I agree, it looks like a MIM-104. 4 square TPK according to the scheme 2 by 2.
    2. +10
      9 June 2019 19: 00
      I think there is more modernization of old American air defense systems
    3. +5
      9 June 2019 19: 36
      Zero. This is Standard1. Some elements of production were transferred to the Shah. However, they could not establish the release of Standard1 until the sanctions were lifted. After the lifting of the sanctions, progress began very quickly. Question from where? Interesting. Perhaps China helped with some elements - but China did not hesitate to transfer production under sanctions (for example, the same FM-80 or C-802). Another option Turkey - the largest operator is Standard1 (the others have long been on Standard2) in the world today, has a good infrastructure for servicing and extending the life of these missiles.




      Here is the original 70's tube version
      1. -2
        10 June 2019 00: 26
        Quote: donavi49
        This is Standard1.

        with what fright these authoritatively declared conclusions?
    4. -3
      10 June 2019 00: 10
      Quote: Victor_B
      I wonder how many circuit solutions tore off the S-300?

      I guess that's it
    5. -2
      10 June 2019 10: 11
      Almost all available ...
    6. 0
      10 June 2019 13: 18
      Quote: Victor_B
      I wonder how many circuit solutions tore off the S-300?

      as you can see - not at all. SAM "Sayyad-3" - Iranian version of the American SAM "Standard" (SM-1ER), launcher - a la "Patriot". The entire air defense system - further development of the Talash complex
  3. -12
    9 June 2019 18: 31
    All this is useless ... Iran, the US is not a rival, even Israel is able to defeat him ...
    1. +2
      9 June 2019 18: 38
      Quote: Diversant Holuy
      All this is useless ... Iran, the US is not a rival, even Israel is able to defeat him ...

      Do we need it today? They would live to see the summer of 2020. Maybe the new president will ease the sanctions. Or maybe not.
      1. +2
        9 June 2019 22: 38
        The new old Trump will certainly think about lifting the sanctions!
    2. +2
      9 June 2019 19: 27
      Israel is able to defeat ...

      Of course in a condition, only the half of Israel in this case will blaze and the Jews lay in pieces ...
      1. +1
        9 June 2019 20: 27
        Quote: armata_armata
        Israel in this case will blaze and the Jews lay in pieces ...

        Please disclose your statement in more detail.
        1. -1
          9 June 2019 22: 24
          Medium-range ballistic missiles. A few thousand pieces. In short
          1. +2
            9 June 2019 23: 10
            Quote: Armata T-14
            Medium-range ballistic missiles. A few thousand pieces. In short

            "By the beginning of the 2000s, the final formation of full nuclear triad.
            However, Israeli nuclear forces mainly focused on deterring their Arab neighbors and Iran and previously did not claim to solve global problems.
            The situation began to change after the 2005 test of the Jericho-3 ballistic missile. "
            And if in more detail:
            https://topwar.ru/89288-yadernaya-era-chast-7-ya.html
            https://topwar.ru/34935-oruzhie-posledney-nadezhdy.html
      2. +2
        9 June 2019 22: 26
        It’s scary to think what will happen to Iran then, I think in that case it will cease to exist at all ... definitely
        1. -1
          10 June 2019 08: 25
          Quote: Diversant Holuy
          It’s scary to think what will happen to Iran then, I think in that case it will cease to exist at all ... definitely

          He is in the region of 5 years. The same amount will last.
        2. -2
          10 June 2019 10: 33
          It’s scary to think what will happen to Iran then, I think in that case it will cease to exist at all ... definitely

          In any case, he will not be, the Jews will arrange the genocide of the Persians worse than Hitler, so the only thing that remains for the Persian is to take as many Israelis as possible with them to the grave
        3. 0
          10 June 2019 17: 25
          Israel - will cease its. This is said in the prophecy, or rather, in the script, and it will be fulfilled. Everything is already decided. By the way, Iran will destroy these Satanists
      3. 0
        10 June 2019 10: 18
        There were times when Jews and pieces were not left. You write this nonsense with such pleasure, it already becomes sickening. Can we compare the Jews of Russia with the Persians of Russia? Who, where, how and at what?
        1. -1
          10 June 2019 10: 23
          There were times when Jews and pieces were not left. You write this nonsense with such pleasure, it’s getting sickening

          Try not to bomb the neighbors and not to sweep other territories, maybe it will become less sickening wink
    3. 0
      9 June 2019 20: 18
      Quote: Diversant Holuy
      All this is useless ... Iran, the US is not a rival, even Israel is able to defeat him ...

      One should always strive to cause unacceptable damage. ONUS probably everyone remembers what
  4. +4
    9 June 2019 18: 45
    Well, and here everyone wonders if Iran needs S-400 or not.
    No, it’s clear that this Khordad-15 is far from Russian systems, but its own.
  5. +3
    9 June 2019 18: 48
    In addition, according to the minister, the Khordad-15 is capable of detecting subtle air targets within a radius of 85 kilometers and shooting down them within a radius of 45 kilometers. Among other things, the new air defense system is capable of simultaneously intercepting 6 targets.

    Let them think what to do with planning bombs - they are now defenseless against them.
    Well, of course it’s impressive for their level.
    1. +7
      9 June 2019 20: 57
      This level of them is constantly and steadily growing, but during the Iraq-Iran war they couldn’t make mortars, and now they have their own air defense, air defense, missile defense, anti-ship missile systems. They even start to make their own fighters, which at the moment can hardly be considered modern, but the big starts with the small, and the one who walks will overpower the road. Well, add to this their ambitions. This is where the Arab monarchies feel uneasy. Iran is outside the pro-American system and uncontrollable to it, this is what annoys the USA, because it shows everyone an alternative non-pro-American way development. By the way, Iran also launches its satellites.
      1. +1
        9 June 2019 21: 00
        .Here, the Arab monarchies become uneasy. Iran is outside the pro-American system and is not controlled by it, and this annoys the United States, because it shows everyone an alternative non-pro-American way of development

        And most importantly - in Iranian banks there is no loan interest)))
        Credit is given without interest.
        On the holy encroached))))
        1. 0
          9 June 2019 21: 13
          Here it is. Only here is the oil dependence of the Achilles heel of Iran.
          TFR Souma IRI.
          On March 8, The Algemeiner published information on the development of a new Iranian strategic cruise missile, which will soon go into a series for the armed forces of the Islamic state. We are talking about the cruise missile "Soumar" ("Soumar") with a range of about 2500 km. According to the Lebanese television channel Al Manar, Iranian Defense Minister Hussein Dahgan on Sunday introduced a new product related to strategic missile weapons.

          https://army-news.ru/2015/03/raketnyj-kompleks-soumar-i-strategicheskaya-gibkost-vs-irana/
          Keep in mind that after the collapse of the USSR, X-55 disappeared from Ukraine, in my opinion even nuclear warheads from these KRs were sold to Iran.
          1. 0
            9 June 2019 21: 21
            The Somar cruise missile is a novelty of the modern Iranian missile industry. Made on the basis of the Russian TFR X-55, has a range of 2500 km, flight speed of about 0,8M. The most important thing that distinguishes it from the Chinese DH-10 is the classic design of the power plant, where the turbojet engine is moved outside the fuselage of the Kyrgyz Republic in a separate engine nacelle, this simplifies the design, but at the same time increases the radar visibility of the rocket

            From a recent photo, we can conclude that the strategic cruise missile is a complete copy of the Russian X-55 missile, developed by the Rainbow NGO in 1983. There are no conformal fuel tanks on the rocket, which makes us attribute it to the earlier version of the X-55 (conformal tanks with a capacity of 0,26 tons are installed on the more advanced X-55CM, its range is 3500 km). The aerodynamic planes of the rocket (plumage) also correspond to the X-55 in shape, the design of fastening a small single-shaft turbofan engine in a separate engine nacelle is also similar.

            Not so long ago, the “White Book G8: Russia's Struggle Against the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction” was presented, which clearly mentions the fact that the Ukrainian side sold 7 TFRs X-55 to China and 5 X-55 to Iran, and it would be very naive to believe that China and Iran will not use these copies to strengthen its military capabilities. Thus, Ukraine, without realizing it, planted a big “pig” for the Americans, which at this stage will significantly weaken NATO’s position in the region.
            https://army-news.ru/2015/03/raketnyj-kompleks-soumar-i-strategicheskaya-gibkost-vs-irana/
          2. -3
            9 June 2019 21: 34
            Keep in mind that after the collapse of the USSR, X-55 disappeared from Ukraine, in my opinion even nuclear warheads from these KRs were sold to Iran.

            Most likely it is - without technology transfer, Iran would still fill a lot of cones ...
        2. 0
          9 June 2019 23: 06
          Oil painting. On weekends, Iranian bankers stand on the porch and collect money, and on weekdays they give interest-free loans to everyone. Murabaha (Islamic mortgage). You come to the bank, say that you want to buy an apartment and become a partner of the bank. The bank turns to a real estate dealer and buys an apartment from him, they also become partners. The bank sells the apartment you bought plus an honest (not usurious) remuneration for your labors and efforts. Sharia norms are observed, there is no loan interest, everyone is happy.
  6. +1
    9 June 2019 19: 12
    As I understand it, they only have a self-propelled guns of their own design (or the Chinese helped someone else go create), but there is no AFAR yet!
    1. +1
      9 June 2019 22: 27
      Who cares. Pfar in the Su-35, for example, is better than Afar in the Mig-35 and F-22. Concrete performance is important
  7. +5
    9 June 2019 19: 32
    Related News


    1. +3
      9 June 2019 20: 43
      Sayyad-3 is already a very American Patriot. But now you can't fly over Iran. Last year, the Sufu F-16I was shot down in Syria with the help of the S-200. And the experience of fighting the Saudi F-15 in Yemen was probably taken into account by Iran, and there Saudi planes often fell for "technical" reasons. So you shouldn't laugh at Iran.
      During the ceremony in Tehran, Iranian Defense Minister Amir Khatami showed reporters the Khordad-15 air defense system. According to him, it was developed by experts of the military department of the Islamic Republic and is capable of simultaneously hit up to six targets (aircraft and drones) with Sayyad-3 missiles, Tasnim reports.

      It is indicated that the air defense system can hit targets at a distance of up to 150 km. At the same time, according to Khatami, it takes only five minutes to bring it into combat readiness.

      Read more at RBC:
      https://www.rbc.ru/politics/09/06/2019/5cfd1e4e9a79470eecc698ad
      1. +4
        9 June 2019 21: 58
        With the help of S-125, Sufu was shot down - both pilots are alive. If the S-200 fell from the F-16, there would be nothing left - 37 thousand striking elements, it hits in the opposite direction. Separate fragments of bodies would remain from the pilots.
    2. +1
      9 June 2019 23: 06
      Bismillahi Rahimi Rahim, I am Almulyan Momunin, I Ilahi I Kuvvat Yalli Azim. I amyamil Momunin (several times). If they will repeat this garbage before each launch, they should at least S-1000, Patriot Pak 1000,
      give sense to zero.
      1. 0
        11 June 2019 20: 12
        Yeah! That's what I'm talking about laughing
    3. 0
      11 June 2019 20: 11
      It's funny After the starting countdown, he also managed to pray! laughing Awesome efficiency! Yes
  8. -4
    9 June 2019 19: 34
    Chasing our S-300s for Iran is a dead end. Today it is wiser to create a small and cheap optical and sound surveillance station, which will be no more complicated than a smartphone. If you place them after 5 km, then 40-80 thousand pieces will be enough to cover most of Iran. For example, on the poles of a power line ... Well, between them are the automatic controllers of the Stingers. They spotted the plane with optics, lifted light platforms with stingers 3-5 km high into the air on its way, and there is nowhere to go for all these stealths: the thermal radiation of the engines cannot be hidden, and the optics will recognize the silhouette at close range.
    .
    Hundreds of thousands of such devices would be enough for us in the European part of the country. You will now regret that instead of their production of smartphones, money was sent to various moronic funds. And the money disappeared, and we can’t do defense equipment.
    1. +4
      9 June 2019 19: 41
      Quote: also a doctor
      Chasing our S-300s for Iran is a dead end. Today it is wiser to create a small and cheap optical and sound surveillance station, which will be no more complicated than a smartphone. If you place them after 5 km, then 40-80 thousand pieces will be enough to cover most of Iran. For example, on the poles of a power line ... Well, between them are the automatic controllers of the Stingers. They spotted the plane with optics, lifted light platforms with stingers 3-5 km high into the air on its way, and there is nowhere to go for all these stealths: the thermal radiation of the engines cannot be hidden, and the optics will recognize the silhouette at close range.
      .
      Hundreds of thousands of such devices would be enough for us in the European part of the country. You will now regret that instead of their production of smartphones, money was sent to various moronic funds. And the money disappeared, and we can’t do defense equipment.

      Ahah, are you serious now? : D
    2. -1
      9 June 2019 21: 58
      "do not hide the thermal radiation of the engines," ////
      ----
      They hide and hide perfectly. Neither the F-22 nor the B-2 has any thermal radiation
      do not detect.
      1. +3
        9 June 2019 22: 38
        Indeed, where does the thermal radiation come from, if they fly on a gravitap or fly, or at God's blessing.
        1. +2
          9 June 2019 22: 45
          It’s the same with stealth: depending on which
          distance. And at what height. And, of course, not afterburner.
          Raptor nozzles are cased, unlike open nozzles
          Russian fighters. When a raptor flies high on
          economy mode (not like in this air show)
          It’s not easy to spot him on the thermal trail.
          1. +1
            9 June 2019 22: 51
            It's not even the nozzle, don't you see how the body itself "glows" from aerodynamic friction? And this is at low speed, because the performance at the air show. And at altitude and at cruising speed, this radiation will be even stronger.
            1. +1
              9 June 2019 23: 01
              Not stronger, but weaker. Air at a height is more discharged (less friction),
              and at the height it’s very cold.
              1. +1
                9 June 2019 23: 16
                I just watched exactly the same video from f16 ... and it makes no difference, except that the second is smaller.
                At the high altitude, conventional subsonic airliners heat up to 30 degrees, i.e. if the raptor can fly without heating, it is "quietly".
                1. -1
                  10 June 2019 07: 22
                  Quote: Corn
                  I just watched exactly the same video from f16 ... and it makes no difference, except that the second is smaller.
                  At the high altitude, conventional subsonic airliners heat up to 30 degrees, i.e. if the raptor can fly without heating, it is "quietly".

                  it has dozens of operating modes, and B2 is generally subsonic, and it’s not so quiet, 800 km / h for maximum stealth.
    3. 0
      11 June 2019 20: 22
      If you supervise people at the same level of technical training, then I am truly sorry for them! ..
      Stinger has a ceiling of about 3 km. If you offer to launch from platforms (i.e., from air defense airships, as I understand it), then such a platform can be raised by 3, maximum 5 km. 3 + 3 = 6 km. The Me-109 had a higher ceiling.
      Nonsense on the poles of power lines due to RF interference will have a funny radius, and they will also require the organization of a non-illusory service system ... And the offer of sound observation in relation to supersonic aircraft generally looks monstrously strange ... Do you think that Israel will to pour bombs into buckets from S-5? Or will IL-14 be customized for these purposes?
      I’m telling you - at least I gave the arguments. There are probably specialists on the site on the topic that you raised, which are generally funny like babble babies ... request
  9. +2
    9 June 2019 20: 07
    This is SM-1, i.e. the level of the 70-80s of the last century, but they themselves do
    1. D16
      +1
      9 June 2019 21: 47
      Did you determine the appearance of the rocket?
      1. +1
        9 June 2019 22: 11
        not just like sm-1, a one-on-one copy, why do you think? just like the look?
        1. +3
          9 June 2019 22: 22
          but SM-1, find the differences

          due to sanctions, they couldn’t release a copy themselves, now they can
        2. +3
          9 June 2019 22: 34
          This is the first version of missiles - Sayyad-2, the Persians a couple of years ago also made a new missile - Sayyad-3, it is already quite noticeable from SM-1 and has a large range.

          The photo of the new air defense system shows that next to the launcher both options are demonstrated
          1. 0
            9 June 2019 22: 38
            made some improvements, but this is hardly a breakthrough, a slightly improved version of sm-1
  10. +1
    9 June 2019 20: 39
    The system is named after a memorable date and is called the 15th chordad, where chordad is one of the months of the Persian calendar. They even have a street and a metro station in Tehran with the same name.
  11. 0
    9 June 2019 22: 01
    Even if the air defense missile system is "not a fountain", the conscience of the Persians will still be calm: "They did what they could."
  12. +3
    9 June 2019 22: 21
    Fine, but nothing outstanding. Not even the PM-1 level, I'm already silent about the PM-2 / B4, all the more about the S-400
    1. +1
      9 June 2019 22: 38
      In Iran itself they are assigned to a different level, they are intended to replace old medium-range air defense systems, such as Hawk.
  13. +2
    10 June 2019 00: 47
    Quote: poquello
    Quote: Vol4ara
    That's just the inclined container should be tilted towards the enemy ...

    did you come up with it yourself, or did you read it in the magazine "Radio" for 70 years? not necessary now, but directed ones are easier to implement

    Missile launch from inclined launchers is always made towards the target
    1. 0
      11 June 2019 20: 25
      Judging by the level of argumentation, your opponent does not even suspect such a fact, although this is obvious even from the video from the BM-13 "Katyusha" laughing wassat
  14. +1
    10 June 2019 01: 46
    It smacks of anti-Semitism. laughing
    1. +3
      10 June 2019 06: 47
      How cute - wonderful hutspa! (with)
    2. -1
      10 June 2019 07: 26
      Quote: Paranoid50
      It smacks of anti-Semitism. laughing

      smacks of figs from fertilizer sticks fellow
    3. 0
      11 June 2019 20: 27
      But tell me, please, when did the Persians like the Jews? Well, at least one fact in the last 2500 years? request what
      1. 0
        11 June 2019 20: 33
        Quote: Aqela
        Well, at least one fact

        laughing Hammer, never mind. Yes Usually on this saying (already almost a hashtag wassat ) freshman freshmen are being conducted, but, as we see, it happens that someone more experienced catches. laughing hi
  15. 0
    10 June 2019 08: 30
    For starters, let them break in in Syria. And there you can already talk about the effectiveness of new developments.
  16. +3
    11 June 2019 11: 36
    Quote: knn54
    It is respectable that Iran is not engaged in "total" copying like China or simply "screwdriver" assembly like India. Yes, it buys equipment. But gradually, slowly, it replaces it with its own. The country strives for "self-development", in contrast, for example , from the Saudis ...

    Actually, Nikolay, the previous version of the rocket - Sayyad-2 (Sayyad-2) - is nothing more than a slightly modified in terms of size and, of course, range version of the American RIM-66 Standart SM-1MR rocket. The model Sayyad-3 (Sayyad-3) sizes and range are even higher, but in fact the internal structure and the filling remained all American (I mean the control system). This means that the Americans will find a means of countering it very quickly (if they have not already found it). And comrade is right 210ox - an air defense system is required, and without it, individual super-duper weather systems will not do


    Quote: Victor_B
    A rocket doesn't care where to start.
    Put the S-300 missile in an inclined container, turn off the declination system and voila!
    From an inclined container is easier. Turned on the march and that's it!

    Easier, but there are also disadvantages. And comrade is right, this system 15th Khordad has circuit solutions from the Patriot rather than the S-300

    Quote: asv363
    By the way, the photo in the news is small, but you can see 4 containers per chassis, launch at an angle:
    https://en.mehrnews.com/news/146206/Iran-unveils-advanced-air-defense-system

    Those. for six escorted targets, they need three cars, based on the consumption of two missiles per target. Starting at an angle to the vertical is a different principle for building an air defense system than in the S-300.

    This system is implemented in two versions. For the army (air defense) and for the IRGC. Different radars, different launchers (on different chassis). In addition, the SPU can have both 4 containers and two

    Quote: poquello
    Quote: donavi49
    This is Standard1.

    with what fright these authoritatively declared conclusions?

    In fact, the comrade is right. This is a version of RIM-66 Standart SM-1MR

    Quote: Armata T-14
    Medium-range ballistic missiles. A few thousand pieces. In short

    Trim the sturgeon several times, and since the number of starters is generally 30–40 times, then there will be something similar to reality. Iran, like the DPRK, has many missiles, but extremely few launchers. Sometimes the number of missiles exceeds the number of launchers every 10 times.

    Quote: Kosh
    The system is named after a memorable date and is called the 15th chordad, where chordad is one of the months of the Persian calendar. They even have a street and a metro station in Tehran with the same name.

    The system is named in memory of the date - 15 chorda 1342 - 5.06. 1963 - suppression of the rebellion against the Shah
    1. 0
      11 June 2019 20: 30
      Thanks for the detailed answer! good drinks I read it with interest.
  17. +2
    11 June 2019 21: 34
    Quote: also a doctor
    Chasing our S-300s for Iran is a dead end. Today it is wiser to create a small and cheap optical and sound surveillance station, which will be no more complicated than a smartphone. If you place them after 5 km, then 40-80 thousand pieces will be enough to cover most of Iran. For example, on the poles of a power line ... Well, between them are the automatic controllers of the Stingers. They spotted the plane with optics, lifted light platforms with stingers 3-5 km high into the air on its way, and there is nowhere to go for all these stealths: the thermal radiation of the engines cannot be hidden, and the optics will recognize the silhouette at close range.
    .
    Hundreds of thousands of such devices would be enough for us in the European part of the country. You will now regret that instead of their production of smartphones, money was sent to various moronic funds. And the money disappeared, and we can’t do defense equipment.

    And they don't have to chase. They have a BAVAR-373 complex. not an exact copy, but a kind of analogue of our "three hundred". Moreover, according to open sources, the Iranians in Syria were unhappy with the "373" and seemed to have brought their BAVAR-XNUMX there.

    The system that you offer, with a probability of 95 percent, will be inoperative. The more complicated (and you have about 80 thousand sensors, not counting platforms with MANPADS) - the less its MTBF. It will very often fail, if at all.

    As for the "Stinger" and the thermal radiation of the target, heat traps have been used for decades, which will simply lead MANPADS away from the target.