The growth of Russian influence in the Arctic. Will it get hot in the ice?

17

America is preparing to throw another challenge


American National Security Advisor to the President John Bolton is ready to challenge the growing Russian military influence in the Arctic. He stated this when speaking to graduates of the Coast Guard Academy. Perhaps this can be attributed to the usual figures of speech, which are used on each suitable occasion, and forget, but still you first need to pay attention to the wording itself.





In the definition of “growing Russian military influence”, the key word is “military”. That is, the United States is precisely what is defined as the main threat to its interests. They are not embarrassed by the economic projects of Russia in the Arctic or scientific, no, most of all they are alarmed by the strengthening of the military component of the Russian presence in the region.

It follows that the words “challenge” carry a very serious load, because only by military means this growing military influence of Russia can be resisted. You will agree that Russia is unlikely to consider the construction of a research complex or a drifting station in response to the creation of the Russian military Arctic base "Shamrock"? So, consciously or unconsciously, Mr. Bolton makes it clear to us: in response to Russia's gain, the Americans are preparing to intensify even more so that they can have a year-round presence in the Arctic region.

The growth of Russian influence in the Arctic. Will it get hot in the ice?


Actually, considering where this statement was made, and also taking into account the accompanying rhetoric, this was by no means binomial Newton. Still, the clarification is important, because Americans love to talk about international cooperation, and about world peace, and other such things ...

J. Bolton:
You will help the United States challenge the growing Russian military influence in the Arctic and oppose China’s illegal claim to "near-arctic status."


If we note that previously US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo stated that the Arctic Council "became more attentive to the threat from China and Russia," the approximate train of thought in the heads of US high-ranking officials becomes clear. But for the time being it is not clear to everyone and to the end what exactly our “partners” are so annoying? Are they seriously afraid of Russian troops on the northern coast of Canada, or tremble for Alaska?

In fact, this is not entirely true. For more than a hundred years, America has been living by the formula "Who owns the sea, he owns the world." It is attributed to the American Rear Admiral, a prominent theorist of naval affairs, one of the first major geopolitics Alfred Mahan. This phrase very briefly and clearly reflects the essence of the concept of Mahan, according to which the control of maritime trade is, in fact, a key factor in determining the fate of the world. The one who controls it has the right to dispose of those to whom to develop and to whom to live, to strangle with the sea blockade, and to whom to ensure the uninterrupted provision of the necessary resources, raw materials, technologies and so on.

Probably right now we see how this doctrine has manifested itself in all its glory. So, you can only admire the man who formulated all this almost a half century ago.

From cabotage to international traffic


The Northern Sea Route, as we know, is now rather an internal transport corridor providing supplies to remote northern regions of the country, export of hydrocarbons, metals (the largest producer of which, Norilsk Nickel, depends almost entirely on the Northern Sea Route), and more. .d But some warming of the climate and “thawing” of the Arctic promise him (and us, as a state) much greater prospects. In particular, in the foreseeable future, the Northern Sea Route may become a full-fledged alternative to the sea route from Asia to Europe (and vice versa) - around India, through the Suez Canal, etc.

According to experts, the total freight turnover in this direction may soon reach eight hundred million tons. And in monetary terms, he has already reached 700 billions of dollars. Despite the fact that China and some other interested countries are trying to somehow diversify their logistics in this area, as long as it works out badly. This means that the lion’s share of trade between the EU and the countries of the Asia-Pacific region runs along the said sea route, which is almost entirely controlled by the United States and its allies.

Any serious alternative to this trade route drastically reduces the chances of the United States at the right time to completely “block oxygen”, for example, to China. This means that the United States cannot allow such an alternative to emerge. Or, if this cannot be prevented, it must be taken over its control and begin to dispose of it as well, for example, in the Indian Ocean or in the Philippine archipelago.

It is clear that skeptics will say: the creation of such an alternative is very expensive, which means that its appearance is unlikely. Moreover, the previously established path is fairly safe, studied, and comfortable - why should the garden be planted for the sake of perhaps a gain of a few days?

And where is the money to take?


But the answer is quite simple. First of all, you need to keep in mind that the main interested party is China. The country is very powerful, it is very interested in security of its trade routes, it has enough resources and means. Europe, perhaps, would be ready to continue to follow in the tail of its American friends, but this hardly concerns the economic benefits and commercial interests of European companies.

And in this sense, everything is also quite good - in some cases, the temporary gain of the shipper and the transport company can be up to ten days if they send the goods along the Northern Sea Route. That is nearly thirty percent. Is it a lot or a little?

Strictly speaking, for any electronics manufacturer this is not critical at all - the load will not deteriorate, it will not have time to become obsolete. But for the transport company, the shipowner is a huge gain. Just imagine that your ship takes on a new cargo at least a quarter more often. This is not so critical when it comes to a one-time contract. But when we talk about years or even decades of work of a transport vessel, the benefit becomes simply enormous, and it is unlikely that any shipowner will refuse to increase his income so much.

Of course, everything is not so simple: pilotage in arctic waters is still very expensive. But nuclear-powered icebreakers are relatively inexpensive to operate (we’ll clarify with large amounts of work), and the cost of transportation along the southern route is also greatly influenced by the payment for passing through the Suez Canal, various pilotage and dispatch deductions in narrow places such as straits, and the dormant crew ten days to pay.

And if we consider that a significant part of the transport companies engaged in cargo transportation along the Europe-Asia route and back, is somehow controlled by the Europeans, the issue becomes far from idle.

Therefore, we can well expect that the transformation of the Northern Sea Route into a powerful international transport artery will proceed at a much faster pace than skeptics say ...

And if so, the interest of Americans to this topic becomes quite understandable. No, there is not even a desire to podgadit Russia - here is something much more important and important, here, without exaggeration, it is about the possibility to continue to rule the world.

But now the Americans have only two icebreakers of not the first freshness, but John Bolton, reasoning about the need to challenge Russia. And with all due respect to the American capabilities, we must admit that this will somehow not be enough to block, if necessary, this new transport artery. And taking into account the Russian (and Chinese) forces, which can be operatively concentrated at the Bering Strait, even a full-fledged American AUG looks doubtful ...

Therefore, we are waiting for the "partners" to get to the words from the matter, and closely monitor their hands. That and look, in the Arctic it will really become hot ...
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    25 May 2019 05: 05
    Bolton makes it clear to us: in response to the strengthening of Russia, the Americans are preparing to strengthen even more,

    Our Foreign Ministry (Leopold), as always, speaks ... Guys, let's live together ... mice in response Leopold (Foreign Ministry) come out ... come out a sneaky coward.
    This is exactly the situation with the Arctic. Russia needs to increase its presence in the Arctic so that not one country can not oppose it ... a fight for the resources of this region is yet to come.
  2. +6
    25 May 2019 05: 06
    The Arctic is ours. This is the North. Hyperborea. Pomors. Mangazeya. Polar explorers. This is a century of history! And sneeze at us on Bolton!

    Put him on an ice floe and let him swim.
    1. +3
      25 May 2019 05: 32
      Who smile Well put him ... he's a monument.
      Bolton is a typical belligerent Russophobe hawk and we will hear his calls to bomb off on Russia's interests.
  3. +3
    25 May 2019 05: 26
    Bolton, a bolt rusted in one place, and let it go through the forest.
  4. +1
    25 May 2019 06: 06
    Large resources are sent to Arctic issues. The direction is one of the important, like all parts of the world of Russia. If only not to the detriment of the western border, where NATO has long breached parity in mobilized power. And where cross-country traffic to Moscow, and especially to Leningrad, can be ensured. a network of roads. And for example, from Salekhard it’s much harder to move to the capitals, and indeed the so-called the arch \ brigade is primarily aviation, including tactical helicopters for point landing. Yes, a network of stations, maybe airfields, but the main line and my fear is the western direction, and not the northern one. And make sure that all sects are not stuck to wealth, directing funds for the development of their business not from the personal income of the company, but from targeted budget items. And they love it so much and the naval program has suffered because of this --- such an opinion was created for a number of reasons and a common sign.
  5. -1
    25 May 2019 06: 56
    Russia's task is to ensure the safe passage of ships through the NSR, to receive money for it and to be the master of this path. All other considerations are about nothing. Something like that.
  6. 0
    25 May 2019 07: 25
    The Cold War in the Arctic promises to be hot ...
  7. Ska
    0
    25 May 2019 09: 53
    After the words and the year-round presence of the Americans ....... I did not even read. They do not have icebreakers, there is no experience of presence in such territories, there is no weapon capable of fighting at such temperatures. What is the article about?
    1. +2
      25 May 2019 15: 26
      ... They do not have icebreakers, there is no experience of presence in such territories, there is no weapon capable of fighting at such temperatures.

      Do you think a cruise missile will not be able to fly from the North Pole to Norilsk at "such temperatures"? Or are you talking about those funny white vans on caterpillars that they carry around Red Square at parades?
    2. +4
      25 May 2019 16: 44
      Quote: SKA
      . They do not have icebreakers, they do not have experience in such territories, and there is no weapon capable of fighting at such temperatures.

      That is why their nuclear submarines, in contrast to ours, are constantly "entertained" by under-ice torpedo shooting, which is mandatory for them in the course of combat training. Maybe, of course, Klimov exaggerates the colors in some way, but I haven’t heard of such massive exercises here ...
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. 0
    25 May 2019 11: 54
    We are waiting for the “partners” to move from words to deeds, and carefully follow their hands. Togo and look, it’ll really get hot in the Arctic

    The NSR is an important, but not the only issue, there are serious disputes over the delimitation of the continental shelf. It may be the persistence of the Danes in the Nord Stream (while Greenland is still Danish territory), among other things, due to the desire to receive concessions from Russia to the disputed places of the shelf .... it is unlikely, but ... wait and see ...
  10. 0
    25 May 2019 15: 06
    We need to develop our fleet, aviation, ports and airdromes left from the USSR in places along the northern coast. And the construction of island bases such as Trefoil and the creation of amusing Arctic troops - a waste of money. In the coming decades, no one is going to fight in the Arctic, and Russia already has problems with money for the most necessary.
  11. 0
    25 May 2019 16: 24
    "and the lazily dozing crew ..." What does this mean, the author? When in the fleet (on the move) someone dozing? Any transition is continuous stress for the crew! I won't say anything else. If you don't know, you don't have to write nonsense!
    1. +1
      25 May 2019 17: 59
      Well, about continuous stress, you turned down of course. The first days on a hike are the opposite of everyone's joy, a smile on their faces, free from shift, coming together. And then the enthusiasm goes out and the routine begins - shift, sleep, shift, sleep, shift, sleep, ...
      1. 0
        13 June 2019 00: 47
        Are you a sailor? Watch sleep. The first days were not joy, but the euphoria that finally broke out into the seas. But the sea does not forgive the slightest mistake, and therefore continuous stress away from the coast!
  12. +1
    25 May 2019 17: 54
    Well, on the Northern Sea Route a large-scale cargo traffic is planned, and this is good money, well, how exceptional they will pass by. Here they are trying.
  13. 0
    25 May 2019 21: 24
    Quote: Ilya-spb
    The Arctic is ours. This is the North. Hyperborea. Pomors. Mangazeya. Polar explorers. This is a century of history! And sneeze at us on Bolton!

    Put him on an ice floe and let him swim.

    Therefore, someone decided to put a pig on the Pomors in the form of Moscow garbage. I wonder if Bolton didn’t mean those people who make such decisions? After all, no icebreaker and shamrock can fix this, as the Satan missiles did not save from the collapse of the Soviet Union.