Nord Stream 2 allows the transfer of the completion of the construction of the "SP-2"

61
The construction of Nord Stream-2 can be delayed and be completed in the second half of 2020, if Denmark only approves the project by the end of this year. This is reported by RIA News with reference to the Nord Stream 2 report to the application for the third route option.

Nord Stream 2 allows the transfer of the completion of the construction of the "SP-2"




According to the report, the completion of the construction of the “SP-2” can be postponed to the second half of next year during the implementation of the project on the third option of the gas pipeline route, if Denmark agrees to the project closer to the end of the current year.

At the moment, Denmark remains the last state that does not give permission for the construction of a gas pipeline, although it already had two pipelines already sent to it. The third variant of the route, involving the laying of a gas pipeline south-east of Bornholm, passing through the exclusive economic zone of Denmark, construction operator Nord Stream 2 AG filed 15 on April of this year, public hearings on it in Denmark are scheduled for June 19.

Thus, the construction operator has already filed three applications for the construction of a gas pipeline: along the main route in the country's territorial waters to the south of Bornholm, an alternative in the exclusive economic zone of Denmark north-west of Bornholm and southeast of Bornholm also in the exclusive economic zone.

If Denmark receives any of the above routes in the near future, the construction of the Nord Stream-2 can be completed by the end of this year, since all permits from Germany, Sweden, Finland and Russia have long been received.

Meanwhile, while Gazprom resolves issues with the laying of a gas pipeline, the Ukraine has once again begun to lament about Russia's refusal from the Ukrainian gas transportation system.

According to the head of Naftogaz, Andrei Kobolev, Russia may suspend the use of the Ukrainian gas transport system for supplying fuel to Europe next year, even if SP-2 is not completed on time. This is allegedly shown by Gazprom’s active buildup of fuel reserves in Europe.

Of course, Kobolev did not forget to remind that in this case Kiev will lose three billion dollars in annual revenue, which is about three percent of the country's GDP. However, he did not voice exactly what amount of this money reaches the state treasury, and does not sink into the pockets of officials.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    17 May 2019 10: 21
    in any case, the time for Ukraine to receive excess return on transit ends. even if a long-term contract is signed with them now, which is doubtful, it will not be the same as the previous one.
    1. +8
      17 May 2019 10: 25
      No, the EU will impose on Gazprom the preservation of Ukrainian transit. The West is firmly convinced that Russia should support Ukraine ...
      1. +10
        17 May 2019 10: 28
        Quote: Greg Miller
        No, the EU will impose on Gazprom the preservation of Ukrainian transit. The West is firmly convinced that Russia should support Ukraine ...

        Let Ukraine contain the west.
        1. +4
          17 May 2019 10: 50
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          Quote: Greg Miller
          No, the EU will impose on Gazprom the preservation of Ukrainian transit. The West is firmly convinced that Russia should support Ukraine ...

          Let Ukraine contain the west.

          Transit, of course, will continue, but (I think so) in the amount of the cost of maintaining the GTS itself + a couple of kopecks.
          It will be a suitcase without a handle. And transit is saved and non-fraternity without profit.
          1. +1
            17 May 2019 10: 55
            Quote: iConst
            Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
            Quote: Greg Miller
            No, the EU will impose on Gazprom the preservation of Ukrainian transit. The West is firmly convinced that Russia should support Ukraine ...

            Let Ukraine contain the west.

            Transit, of course, will continue, but (I think so) in the amount of the cost of maintaining the GTS itself + a couple of kopecks.
            It will be a suitcase without a handle. And transit is saved and non-fraternity without profit.

            That’s all, and at best for the neighbors. At worst, they can stay without transit.
        2. +2
          17 May 2019 10: 59
          ,, Let Ukraine contains the West ,,
          What are you saying ?! After all, they are “independent”! :-) And they decide for themselves whose toilet they should clean- Poland or Germany. This is, independence and independence, :-)
      2. +6
        17 May 2019 11: 41
        The task of the Americans is to cut off Europe from Russian gas. Therefore, the gas transportation system of Ukraine is also fast.
        And Germany understands this better than anyone, and therefore it is fighting for the joint venture 2.
    2. -2
      17 May 2019 10: 33
      Quote: Old bulka
      the time for Ukraine to receive excess return on transit ends.

      As in an old movie: "Greed has ruined the frayer." Be simpler, and everything around you will become easier. Do not bite your neighbor, otherwise strangers will devour and horseradish giblets will remain. hi
    3. +5
      17 May 2019 11: 47
      if a long-term contract with them is signed now, which is doubtful, it will not be the same as the previous one.


      That's it, if the contract is long-term, then it will have to be fulfilled, and this is what the Ukrainians need. And the volumes will be what Europe needs and Russia will continue to feed Ukrainians, and this SP-2 will be just a reserve branch. Ukrainians and Americans through Denmark once again bend Russia. And Ukrainians in volume will dictate their terms and Russia will be forced to accept them since there is no alternative SP-2 is not ready.
      1. -4
        17 May 2019 13: 44
        If you receive approval from Denmark any of the above routes in the near future

        And if Denmark does not give any permission? There now, the "greens" are in full control and they insist on the complete ban of "SP-2" as carrying a "threat" to the "eco-balance" of the Baltic Sea. Everything goes to the fact that Denmark will not give any permission, and then what? In addition, Denmark can endlessly order "examinations" such as "studying the effect of SP-2 on herring fish", then "studying the effect of SP-2 on the Baltic seal", etc., endlessly delaying construction, and the "consortium" cannot contain an idle "pipelayer ".... It means that Denmark will have to either" push "or give her some nishyachka, which she cannot refuse. Only Germany can put pressure, but .... Merkel, the main lobbyist for this project, is living out its last days at work, and the new German government will be created from opponents of the SP-2, and besides, all the "young Europeans" are on the side of "tiny Denmark, as they are They say, "experiencing tremendous pressure from the Russian" gas "monster, coupled with its allies, the European Parliament has already adopted a resolution calling on all EU countries to refuse to support the construction of the SP-2, so it will not work about" pressure ".... nishtyachok "- but here you need to understand that this" nishtyachok "will be very, very expensive for Russia, both financially and reputationally. The EU has already voiced approximate plans of what this" nishtyachok "can be: 1-Russia recognizes itself guilty of shooting down the Boeing with the payment of compensation to all injured relatives, 2-Russia pleads guilty to the occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine and helps to establish Ukrainian jurisdiction in these territories, plus pays Ukraine repar actions for "losses", 3-Russia is obliged to release all Ukrainian "prisoners of war" and demilitarize the Sea of ​​Azov, ensuring the "free" use of it by the Ukrainians, 4-Russia must demilitarize the Crimean peninsula and must develop a "roadmap" for the return of this peninsula to Ukraine with payment reparations to Ukraine, for the losses incurred, 5-Russia undertakes to pump through the Ukrainian GTS volumes no less than those at the peak of transportation, through it, 6-Russia assumes the costs of maintaining the Ukrainian GTS, etc. and then, they say, the EU will think about so as not to consider Russian gas transportation contracts as "posing a threat" to the economic security of the European Union.
        1. +5
          17 May 2019 14: 44
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          1-Russia pleads guilty ....

          1, 2, 3, ..., 1000, etc.
          You can not write further.
          In short Katz offers to give up.
          But, as they say, we show them a big gun on it.
        2. +5
          17 May 2019 14: 59
          From all of the above, only paragraph 5 can at least somehow correspond to reality, and this is exactly what Ukrainians and KOs are seeking. The rest is complete nonsense.
  2. +7
    17 May 2019 10: 33
    Everything is as usual, not to first agree on everything and then poke your nose into the signed papers, so no, first we do it, and then we think ... there was already one such adventure called South Stream, which taught nothing ...
    1. +4
      17 May 2019 11: 55
      We bought pipes for South Stream. The loss was on their excess transportation and storage. The pipes themselves were later used. But they taught Bulgaria well. Bulgaria has lost a lot of money and will continue to lose.
      Denmark will lose no less. Not only Russia - Europe will find how to recover from Denmark. Because otherwise Europe will have to buy expensive American LNG. Gazprom did not promise to supply gas through Ukraine in 2020, and sent letters to consumers in Europe that there would be no deliveries on this route from 2020. Therefore, Europe is stuffing its underground gas storage facilities. There is also LNG and gas carriers in Russia, only in Russia, most likely, all this gas has been contracted. And the United States has it - the Americans were kicked out of the Chinese gas market.
      Quote: news author
      The third route option, involving the laying of a gas pipeline southeast of the island of Bornholm, passing through the exclusive economic zone of Denmark, the construction operator Nord Stream 2 AG filed April 15 this year, a public hearing on it in Denmark is scheduled for June 19.
      Then the author of the news confused. Denmark is asked permission to route through it territorial water - in the same place as SP-1. Danish permission is not required to lay the pipeline through its exclusive economic zone. This is maritime law.
    2. +2
      17 May 2019 15: 00
      Quote: DMoroz
      Everything is as usual, not to first agree on everything and then poke your nose into the signed papers, so no, first we do it, and then we think ... there was already one such adventure called South Stream, which taught nothing ...

      With this understanding of the laws of international business, you are probably already in the top ten FORBES laughing
      "The trouble is, since the pies will start the cobbler oven,
      And the boots are stitching the pastry: "

      In the meantime, Gazprom shares rose $ 9 billion this week. You think that all around are fools and do not understand anything. One you are smart lol
  3. +3
    17 May 2019 10: 34
    Denmark remains the last state that does not give permission to build a gas pipeline
    A country with a population of just over 5,5 million people, which not every European will find on the map is not the first time to show off in relation to Russia. That is what one of the founders of NATO means - submission of the United States practically at the genetic level. Of course, if possible they will pull to the last, but in the end they will have to pull bypassing their zone (fallback).
  4. +2
    17 May 2019 10: 50
    Once already stated, they certainly will not fit the deadlines.)
    According to the head of Naftogaz, Andrei Kobolev, Russia may suspend the use of the Ukrainian gas transport system for supplying fuel to Europe next year, even if SP-2 is not completed on time. This is allegedly shown by Gazprom’s active buildup of fuel reserves in Europe.

    2013: 86,1 billion cubic meters
    2014: 62,2 billion cubic meters
    2015: 67,1 billion cubic meters
    2016: 82,2 billion cubic meters
    January-November 2017: 85,5 billion cubic meters
    2018: 86,8 billion cubic meters
    And through what these volumes will pump, if it is not clear even with TP readiness, but SP2 bye-bye ?! Although they did not solve the problem.) It is unlikely that Europe has so much free space in gas storages. Download to have a margin for a time of crisis in a relationship.
    1. +1
      17 May 2019 11: 09
      86 - 55 = 31 ml.cub. GTS of Ukraine on such a volume will wither.
      1. -1
        17 May 2019 11: 10
        No, 2 EU energy packages 86 - 22,5 = 63,5
        1. 0
          17 May 2019 13: 20
          Tell us about Germany’s 2 energy package ... Does SP-1 work on it? So with SP-2 it will be the same ...
      2. +1
        17 May 2019 18: 58
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        86 - 55 = 31 ml.cub.

        Have you forgotten at least one thread of the Turkish stream, this is almost 16 billion cubic meters.
        1. -2
          17 May 2019 19: 33
          Are there any permissions from the EU on this thread?
          1. +2
            17 May 2019 19: 39
            Are there any prohibitions ??? Bulgaria conducted procedures for booking capacities and held a tender for the construction which the Arkad consortium won (condition 1.3 billion euros for 250 days), it has already announced that some of the pipes will be produced by the Chelyabinsk Tube Rolling Plant. Serbia began construction of its site ....
            1. -1
              17 May 2019 20: 13
              Quote: BrTurin
              Are there any prohibitions ???

              It falls like any gas pipeline under the 3rd energy package
              1. +1
                17 May 2019 20: 26
                What's the problem. The Bulgarian site belongs to Bulgaria; in accordance with the rules, they carried out capacity reservation procedures, some of which were reserved by Gazprom. Bulgarians are building a gas pipeline ....
                1. -1
                  17 May 2019 20: 31
                  Quote: BrTurin
                  What's the problem


                  But D. Medvedev sees some kind of problems ...

                  Medvedev: firm guarantees from the EU are needed to extend the "Turkish Stream" through Bulgaria

                  Economics and business March 4, 2019 0:26

                  According to the Russian Prime Minister, "the new branch should not repeat the sad fate of South Stream."
                  1. +1
                    17 May 2019 20: 45
                    Statements, they are, of course, statements, but work is underway in Bulgaria and Serbia, wait and see ... And statements ... Gazprom is demanding a debt repayment of € 97,7 million from the Bulgarian Energy Holding for the unrealized project for the construction of the South Stream gas pipeline, at the same time, Gazprom should not demand compensation from Bulgaria for the cancellation of the South Stream gas pipeline project (message from the European Commission as part of the completion of the antitrust investigation).
                    1. -1
                      17 May 2019 20: 53
                      Quote: BrTurin
                      but work is going on both in Bulgaria and in Serbia

                      Here ... on the South Stream, too, work was once going on. But they didn’t get permissions. And the reasons for which were not issued in 2014 are preserved now. But people can’t tolerate sawing on pipes and laying)
  5. +1
    17 May 2019 10: 56
    with Denmark even Hitler did not stand on ceremony. I captured it in a day and went on.
  6. +8
    17 May 2019 10: 56
    Last year, there were statements that in case Denmark refused to lay SP-2 through its territory / economic zone, an alternative project for laying pipes through international waters was developed, without increasing the project budget. What's the matter - send the Danes to the forest and go around.
    1. +7
      17 May 2019 11: 03
      It looks like it was just another blah blah blah
    2. +5
      17 May 2019 11: 04
      In terms of an alternative, bypassing Denmark
      1. +2
        17 May 2019 11: 15
        I welcome, in the sense that Denmark remains completely unlimited - it was planned to lay the laying north of its territorial waters and the exclusive economic zone
    3. -1
      17 May 2019 17: 07
      The point was that if Denmark does not allow building in its territories, then it can be built in their exclusive economic zone without their permission ... now all of a sudden it turns out that permission is needed.
  7. +2
    17 May 2019 11: 08
    The main gas transit through Ukraine will be stopped, it is a matter of time.
    Most likely they will leave a certain amount of gas transit through Ukraine to the countries of Eastern Europe.
    Gas transit through Ukraine is an endless American blackmail of Western Europe and Russia, Western Europe perfectly understands this ...
  8. 0
    17 May 2019 11: 13
    Please explain to anyone who knows what the benefits of Denmark are in tightening with permission to build a pipe?
    Is it really so baked for the environment?
    1. +5
      17 May 2019 11: 18
      Quote: Retvizan 8
      Is it really so baked for the environment?

      There are only two options:
      1. at the request of the Americans drag out the process
      2. ask for some special preferences for themselves
    2. +6
      17 May 2019 11: 20
      Quote: Retvizan 8
      Please explain to anyone who knows what the benefits of Denmark are in tightening with permission to build a pipe?

      Exactly the same as in Bulgaria with South Stream. The benefit is not for Denmark, but for the United States, which has Denmark under its control. The SP-2 itself is profitable for Denmark, but you can't argue against the overseas owner.
    3. +2
      17 May 2019 12: 02
      It's like with the "brothers" during the construction of "South Stream" Uncle Sam asked and they are happy to try and then when they realized that they had been raped, it was too late to appear "Tur.potok".
  9. +1
    17 May 2019 11: 13
    hurry, so to speak, in no hurry ... wink
  10. +2
    17 May 2019 11: 21
    gas trade and war ..
    to be continued.
  11. 0
    17 May 2019 11: 25
    At Bornholm, hold a referendum on the accession of either Russia or Germany. Let them decide.
    Denmark democratize the American way.
    The Ukrainian GTS is a communist fake that everyone should forget about forever.
    Lack of gas in Europe for the period of completion of SP-2, compensate for LNG.
  12. +1
    17 May 2019 11: 39
    That’s what we have done.

    The fate of Russia hangs on the string of the gas pipeline, and Denmark decides whether to be him or not.

    As well as Ukraine, which sleeps and sees billions from the Russian pipe. Which Russia seems to no longer need, as has been repeatedly stated.

    Meanwhile, Poor Denmark, together with the same Ukraine, is kicking great Russia like a soccer ball.

    And how long will such a football last?
    1. 0
      17 May 2019 12: 07
      I do not know who is kicking you))))
      1. -3
        17 May 2019 12: 48
        And who loves us? Do you know?
  13. -1
    17 May 2019 12: 02
    No preferences for Kiev, absolutely.
  14. +4
    17 May 2019 12: 13
    Through Danish waters, Nord Stream 2 AG developed the 3 route:



    1. Primary (highest priority) - in the same corridor as SP-1, next to it (black color on the map). Denmark hasn’t been giving him permission since 2017 because of a territorial dispute with Poland.
    2. Northwestern (gray color is an alternative route). Nord Stream 2 AG in August 2018 of the year applied for this option outside the territorial waters of Denmark.
    3. Southeastern (green color is an alternative route, divided into 2 options, B1 and B2, gaskets in Danish waters). Following the resolution of the 40-year territorial dispute between Denmark and Poland at the end of the 2018 year, Nord Stream 2 AG decided to develop this alternative route.

    The schedule of the JV-2 project is as follows:


    Construction work and status
    Construction work in Danish territorial waters includes pipe laying and work on the seabed. The expected duration of the two pipelines is approximately 115 days when choosing a combination of the proposed route SP-2 with B1 and approximately 125 days for the route option SP-2 with B2. The work will be carried out in sequential order, with the laying of each of the threads in turn. Construction is scheduled to begin at the beginning of the 2020 year, but during the development of the project, the timing can be changed.


    The infographic shows that the end of construction and commissioning of the SP-2 is planned for the middle of the 2020 year.
    1. 0
      17 May 2019 12: 56
      In my opinion, all routes are well-designed. So it’s not about the routes. The thing is different. And this real deal is not voiced.
      1. +2
        17 May 2019 14: 42
        Yes, in general, everything is not difficult to understand. Under Danish law, authorities are required to ensure public participation in environmental decisions. These meetings, presentations to the public drag on for many months. Then, in Denmark, an application for the main route of the Nord Stream - 2 pipeline is evaluated. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, since a permit for the construction of a pipeline in the territorial waters of Denmark can only be issued if this activity complies with national interests in the field of foreign policy, security and defense... The United States really does not want the implementation of the SP-2, so they "convinced" the Danes that the gas pipeline does not correspond to their national interests and security. And for the sake of persuasiveness, their destroyer "Gravely" and the British frigate "Westminster" are being driven hard across the Baltic Sea along the route of the pipelayers SP-2. For illustration, the positions of ships and vessels:



        PIONEERING SPIRIT - now laying a pipe in the Swedish sector,
        SOLITAIRE - now laying a pipe in the Russian sector,
        between them the NATO ships destroyer Gravely and the frigate Westminster.
        "The dog barks, the caravan moves on" - SP-2 is under construction!

        http://www.aif.ru/society/army/raketnyy_esminec_ssha_greyvli_vernulsya_k_patrulirovaniyu_baltiki
        1. +2
          17 May 2019 19: 09
          Quote: iaroslav.mudryi
          The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, since permission to build a pipeline in the territorial waters of Denmark can only be issued if this activity is in line with national interests in the field of foreign policy, security and defense.

          This item applies only to the main option that goes through ter. water, with respect to the other two routes, they can only operate with the environment, which they do, but can only tighten ....
          As an example, Article 79 of the Convention on the Law of the Sea - 2. Subject to the right of the coastal state to take reasonable measures to explore the continental shelf, develop its natural resources and prevent, reduce and control pollution from pipelines, this state cannot prevent the laying or maintenance of serviceability of such cables or pipelines.
          1. +2
            17 May 2019 20: 24
            Quote: BrTurin
            This item applies only to the main option that goes through ter. water, with respect to the other two routes, they can only operate with the environment, which they do, but can only tighten ....


            It’s true that this post is about the main route. It takes place in the territorial waters of Denmark, and the Foreign Ministry does not give permission to it. Regarding the two alternative ones, which are outside Danish water. Ecology is the main requirement, but it also takes into account socio-economic (safety of navigation, fishing in the area, marine spatial planning, military training areas) and technical requirements (scale of work on the seabed) - this is rather important for Nord Stream 2 AG itself. In any case, on any of the two alternative routes, subject to all conditions, the Danes are required to give permission. After the main route for Nord Stream 2 AG, the alternative Southeast is also acceptable, (the northwest version of 3 is on the list, reserve). For several months, Denmark will host public discussions on the report submitted by the DEA 15 this May along the S-V route. The deadline for obtaining permits for the project implementation schedule is the end of the 2019 year. The start of pipe laying in Danish waters on schedule is the beginning of the 2020 year.
            1. +1
              17 May 2019 20: 30
              Quote: iaroslav.mudryi
              Denmark to host public debate on report submitted by DEA

              There is only a month left - public hearings in Denmark on the third route of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline will be held on June 19.
              1. +1
                17 May 2019 21: 25
                Quote: BrTurin
                There is only a month left - public hearings in Denmark on the third route of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline will be held on June 19.


                Public hearings will be held, yes 19 June, and then quote:
                ... The public, authorities and non-governmental organizations of Denmark can send comments and questions regarding the EIA documentation to the DEA before July 10. For consultations on transboundary impacts under the Espoo Convention, this period will extend to July 17.


                Already two months, well, let’s improve a couple of months, then they will have nowhere to go.
                1. 0
                  17 May 2019 23: 32
                  Quote: iaroslav.mudryi
                  well let a couple more months

                  If we take the north-western route - "The length of the optimal route for which we applied for in April 2017 is 139 kilometers. The length of the alternative route for which we applied today is 175 kilometers" - 175 km, if the pipelayer is 5 km per day then 35 days + 2,5 months for preparation (SP-1 - Welding of the last joint of the first string on August 19. Launch of the first string on November 8). Let it be 4 months, so that if there is no permission by the beginning of September, then you can accept that this year they may not be in time. Wait and see....
  15. +2
    17 May 2019 12: 28
    As an agreement with 404 to end, you need to cut off the gas before the construction of this pipeline and they themselves run in.
  16. +2
    17 May 2019 13: 03
    And further. In addition to my post above. A very interesting situevina is planned for the 2020 year, and not even in connection with Ukrainian transit, but with the start of construction (if construction starts at all) of the Baltic Pipe - a gas pipeline between Denmark and Poland, which is planned as a branch from the Norwegian gas transmission system to North Sea.
    So, the start of construction is planned at the beginning of the 2020 year, the deadline for putting into operation in the 2022 year is when the PGNiG contract with Gazprom for gas supplies to Poland ends. The trick is that the Baltic Pipe will cross the still unfinished JV-2, but also the existing JV-1.



    Permission to the Poles (Danes) will have to be obtained from Gazprom (count Russia). No, we cannot prohibit, pipeline crossings are regulated by international rules. But to tighten the building permit and drink blood, it is quite possible. Already the Poles themselves talk about it,
    Polityka Insight analyst Robert Tomashevsky: "... although this is a technical discussion, Gazprom may postpone the project or make the whole process take longer"
  17. 0
    17 May 2019 16: 26
    Seriously, this is what the Yankees hold Denmark for.
  18. 0
    17 May 2019 18: 39
    In any case, Ukraine is threatened with a crisis, in the financial sphere. And someone has to pay, so the sponsors of the "mess" are fussing, and the customer is the most!
  19. -1
    17 May 2019 19: 18
    Small bug (Denmark wassat ) - Yes, Smelly !!! am am
    1. 0
      19 May 2019 15: 01
      300 thousand, among other things, the Danes put Hitler and WWII! ..colonies had a lot like belgium holland
  20. 0
    19 May 2019 14: 59
    and when 3 billion Russia, Ukraine will return for the bonds?