The Russian Foreign Ministry announced the date of the possible termination of the INF.

20
The provisions of the Treaty on Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF) are likely to expire on August 2 2019 after the six-month period announced by US President Donald Trump 2 in February. This was announced at a briefing in Moscow, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.

The Russian Foreign Ministry announced the date of the possible termination of the INF.




According to him, Russia was trying to establish a constructive agreement with the United States at a time when the INF Treaty was saved, but Washington decided to break this agreement and 2 of August this year it will cease to operate.

Earlier, Donald Trump said that the United States is beginning to exit from the INF range from 2 in February, but may return to its preservation if Russia destroys all missiles and launchers that allegedly violate the provisions of the treaty within six months. However, Vladimir Putin announced a mirror response of Russia to the actions of the United States and Russia's withdrawal from the INF. At the same time, he forbade Russian diplomats to be the first to initiate any negotiations on this topic.

Meanwhile, the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying that Russia will not deploy medium-range ground-based missiles until it is done by the United States.

The statement says that Russia, embarking on the creation of medium-range ground systems in response to similar actions by the United States, guarantees the non-deployment of ground-based medium-missile complexes until the United States, regardless of the region of their deployment or deployment.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 26 2019 13: 24
    So whether or not to be a placement depends entirely on the United States, the fact is that we have something to answer.
    1. 0
      April 26 2019 13: 46
      And the keys to the apartment do not give him where the money is. And then what will they ask?
    2. +1
      April 26 2019 15: 51
      Quote: Spartanez300
      So whether or not to be a placement depends entirely on the United States, the fact is that we have something to answer.

      ========
      Who would doubt that!!! THAN reply - FIND !!!
      Alas! "partners" - it looks like "NOT IN YOURSELF" ... Well, WHAT to do here ???
  2. +1
    April 26 2019 13: 28
    That's right, there is no need to rush, there are other means, and so far they are enough. And there you look after Trump who will come more adequately, and we will sign the agreement again. In the meantime, I want zircons, zircons!
    1. -4
      April 26 2019 14: 32
      >>> Until then, I want zircons!
      You can want anything, but are you ready to give up a piece of sausage for the sake of the defense of your Motherland? From pineapples with bananas? Get up at five in the morning and plow all day, plow and plow. And not for money, but for conscience?
      1. +8
        April 26 2019 14: 36
        Svetlana! This is my fifth year in the militia, and I am a volunteer from the "other" side. In the Donbass, there is no housing or relatives. How many do you think I gave up if before the war I had my own small business in Kiev? And at the service you need to get up not only at 5 in the morning. Service is round the clock.
        1. -6
          April 26 2019 15: 54
          From the place of your stay, nothing absolutely does not change.
      2. 0
        April 26 2019 18: 59
        You described my everyday life
    2. 0
      April 26 2019 14: 50
      For mattresses, elections are held by analogy with a joke:
      - My father had three sons: the eldest was smart, the middle one was
      this way, the youngest was at all.
      - And what, father was sick, or what?
      - Why not?
      - And what did he get worse and worse each time?
  3. +1
    April 26 2019 13: 32
    For medium-range missiles in Europe, work is above the roof.
    And you can place in the Urals, .... for now.
  4. +2
    April 26 2019 13: 37
    Yes, we are already surrounded by missiles around the perimeter. Do you think the Pentagon will write to VO that medium-range missiles have come to Poland? They will bring in quietly and put on duty. And our intelligence remains to sit in the ear, and not miss the moment the beginning of the movement. Americans do not withdraw from the treaty in order to observe chivalric codes.
    1. +2
      April 26 2019 13: 42
      It is unlikely that they will manage to quietly put these missiles in Poland on combat duty, or rather, it is simply impossible. Firstly, our intelligence will track, and secondly, this is not a needle in a haystack, and such a placement does not pass by journalists.
      1. +2
        April 26 2019 19: 01
        And thirdly, the Poles themselves swell with pride
    2. +1
      April 26 2019 14: 27
      In our time, this is impossible. Find out anyway. And the scandal will be such that you won’t wash yourself off. This is not counting the fact that after this, for example, the very DPRK accidentally will have technologies that the states did not know about. Red lines cross silly. The answer is tormenting.
      1. +1
        April 26 2019 14: 35
        Oh, how exhausted NATO was for its "non-expansion to the East." "I can't eat already." And in Afghanistan it was exhausted, and in Syria. And from Libya and Yugoslavia in general left in depression.
        There are nowhere to put red lines.
        1. 0
          April 26 2019 14: 45
          Times are different. And what does NATO have to do with it? Remember the Caribbean. Some put, others in response, and then on the razor's edge on foot.
          1. +1
            April 26 2019 15: 24
            So the amers were smart enough not to heat the situation. The answer is under her nose.
  5. +1
    April 26 2019 14: 36
    What is the difference when, if now this treaty is dead by the efforts of the USA? ??
  6. 0
    April 26 2019 18: 40
    In the days of the USSR and ATS, these very SMD missiles were deployed to NATO. Do you remember the borders of the then NATO? Where is it now? Literally beyond the threshold. I remember the euphoria from the INF Treaty. But now everything is back to square one, only Russia is the loser. For 30 years the situation has worsened. And a possible escalation of the conflict is very likely. Response time decreased. While there is no deployment of INF, but there is a high probability. No wonder hysteria is being pumped up.
  7. 0
    April 27 2019 08: 01
    Well, after August 2, it will somehow be more anxious to live ...
    Just Airborne Day and immediately after it is more alarming.
    On the other hand, maybe by then a couple of Poseidons
    will already be lying off the coast of the United States awaiting a signal.