In Belarus, tests of the upgraded 9A33 − 1B Osa air defense system were tested

In Belarus, the next stage of testing of the 9A33-1B Osa anti-aircraft missile system modernized by Belarusian specialists was completed. As transmits "Warspot" With reference to the portal tut.by, the tests of the modernized “Wasps” took place at the end of March at the 174 training ground of the Air Force and air defense forces in the Brest region.

Adopted by the Soviet army in 1971, the Osa anti-aircraft missile system over the years has been modernized several times. In Belarus, the decision to improve it was made in 2012 year. During the work carried out at the enterprise 2566 th plant for the repair of electronic weapons "updated air defense system, previously" seen "objects at a distance of no more than 40 km and hit them at a distance not exceeding 9 km, gained the ability to detect the enemy at a distance of 60 km and hit on range in 12. The upgraded complex, designated 9А33 – 1Б, was adopted by the Belarusian army in 2016 year.

However, Belarusian gunsmiths do not stop at what has been accomplished and continue to improve the complex, increasing its combat capabilities.

The Russian army is also in service with one of the modifications of the air defense system called "Osa-AKM", developed as early as 1980 year. In 2016, the Izhevsk Electromechanical Plant “Kupol” presented a modernized version of the Osa-AKM1 air defense system.

Comments

[svp67]

In Belarus, the next stage of testing of the 9A33-1B Osa anti-aircraft missile system, modernized by Belarusian specialists, has passed.

Yeah ... We even can not or do not want to provide the closest ally with new models of military equipment, in the right quantities. Sadness
Although happy for the squabs. Well done, work hard, and God will bring you good luck and success

[Labrador]

But Old Man provided everyone with his shrimps and bananas
But essentially: well done! They don’t give up improving their weapons, even without a lot of money. For this they respect.

[Bongo]

Quote: svp67

Yeah ... We even can not or do not want to provide the closest ally with new models of military equipment, in the right quantities. Sadness

Why can't we? It's just that the "closest ally" is not ready to buy Russian fighters and anti-aircraft systems even at preferential prices, but wants to receive them for free. At the same time, medium and short-range air defense systems, modernized and built in Belarus, are exported.

[svp67]

Quote: Bongo

It's just that the "closest ally" is not ready to buy Russian fighters and anti-aircraft systems even at preferential prices, but wants to receive them for free.

I am begging you. You have to pay for domination and if you compare the amount in money, what we have written off to many countries and the amount of expenses for the supply of equipment to Belarus, then something tells me that the amount will be about three different.

[Bongo]

Quote: svp67

I am begging you. You have to pay for domination and if you compare the amount in money, what we have written off to many countries and the amount of expenses for the supply of equipment to Belarus, then something tells me that the amount will be about three different.

For domination over Belarus?
Who prevents to unite in a union state or place a Russian base with fighters and air defense systems on the territory of the Republic of Belarus?
And to give the latest weapons, I consider the occupation unpromising.

[svp67]

Quote: Bongo

And to give the latest weapons, I consider the occupation unpromising.

What is "latest" in your understanding? The Belarusians were not told they were happy with our T-72B3, since what they have on the equipment is still the "Maidin of the YSSR"

[Bongo]

Quote: svp67

What is "latest" in your understanding? The Belarusians were not told they were happy with our T-72B3, since what they have on the equipment is still the "Maidin of the YSSR"

Are we talking about air defense, right? And where are the tanks?
Old Man is not against the gift of receiving C-400 and Su-30CM, as recently received C-300PS free of charge within the framework of the CSTO and the United Air Defense. But he categorically does not want to pay for modern anti-aircraft systems and fighters.
At the same time, Belarus could independently provide itself with air defense systems and fighters. Ask how many upgraded S-15, Buk, Osa air defense systems and MiG-125 fighters have been exported from Belarus over the past 29 years.

[prosto_rgb]

Quote: Bongo

But he categorically does not want to pay for modern anti-aircraft systems and fighters.
At the same time, Belarus could independently provide itself with air defense systems and fighters.

By setting a rent for a communications base and radar.
Or join NATO and generally abandon the maintenance of the Air Force according to the example of the Old Baltic.

[Alexga]

"how recently, within the framework of the CSTO and the United Air Defense Forces, received the S-300PS free of charge" I do not know where you got such data, but for 4 battalions of the Republic of Belarus I paid for their overhaul and delivery. So the factories in Buryatia and near St. Petersburg did not stand idle, but worked for denyushki RB. And RB paid for the delivery.

[Bypassed]

Dear Russians have not forgiven the penny to the Republic of Belarus, unlike other countries (the network has a figure of more than $ 140 billion. Yes, plus Ukraine already 3,0 billion, plus the amount that Gazprom put on loss). Belarusians gave the Russians a gas pipe for their debts. Belarus has no payments on credit obligations to the Russian Federation - this is confirmed by the Government of the Russian Federation.
But in the current situation, it would be most right for the Russians to let Belarusians go free swimming. Survive so survive. They will become part of Poland. But we will deal with shrimp. By the way, about shrimp - in chain stores in Belarus there are a lot of packages from VICI - and this is a Russian company. Where do you grow them? In the Arctic?

[APASUS]

[quote = PASSED BY] But in the current situation it would be most correct for the Russians to let the Belarusians go freely [/ quote]
What kind of situation is this? That there are prerequisites for the economic breakthrough of Belarus and only the Russian Federation is a brake.
[quote = PASSED BY] They will survive so they will survive. [/ quote]
You won’t survive, you can rest assured. There is a globalization of markets, countries are turning back together.
[quote = PASSED BY] Will become part of Poland so will. [/ quote]
So maybe this is the main goal, why are these muddy stories about the situation .............
[quote = WAS PASSED BY] By the way, about shrimp - in chain stores in Belarus there are a lot of VICI packages - and this is a Russian company. Where do you grow them? In the Arctic?
[/ Quote]
[/ Quote]
I think reading about VIČI (Vichy) was not a leisure time, maybe it didn’t look silly
[quote] The Vichyunay group of enterprises includes 80 enterprises from 17 countries of the world. [/ quote]

[Bypassed]

On those VIČI packages that are in Belarusian stores - inscriptions - are made in Russia.

[APASUS]

Quote: bypassed

On those VIČI packages that are in Belarusian stores - inscriptions - are made in Russia.

In the Russian Federation, you can also find shrimp from Belarus, apples, parmesan, jamon and how to consider it?

[Piramidon]

Quote: PASSED BY

Dear Russians have not forgiven a penny to the Republic of Belarus

Doesn't gas and oil at reduced prices count?

[d1975]

Ukraine is not enough for you, or has this bitter experience not taught anything?

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Bongo

At the same time, medium and short-range air defense systems modernized and built in Belarus are exported.

The matter is much simpler, there are six countries where the Wasps stand. The Belarusians are offering them to be updated, I would have been Djulbars if it hadn’t agreed. Another thing is what KOFi it. The troops will receive work, but in Africa the flight of an attack aircraft on a combat course sometimes makes it strategic the kid.

[widower]

Quote: svp67

We cannot even or don’t want to provide new models of military equipment,

so they don’t ask to sell them.
and enough for free already

[svp67]

Quote: widower

so they don’t ask to sell them.
and enough for free already

Sorry, but everything can be solved. Russia is now supplying a lot of combat equipment for such a "freebie".

[widower]

Quote: svp67

Sorry, but everything can be solved.

Excuse me, should we impose if they do not ask to sell them?

[Mordor]

As a matter of fact, Russia offered the "father" to place a full-fledged air base on the territory of Belarus. But bam said that we have enough aces of our own pilots, just give us airplanes! But here we, for example, buy MZKT from them for the needs of our army, and do not receive it out of "friendship". Of course, there is a variant of barter, a batch of MZKT, for a batch of SU-30SM, but how will bam fill the "treasury"? Or full integration! Lukashenka, he went with a roof and behaves like a petty blackmailer!

[d1975]

One hundred pounds, only on TV and no, he is soooooooooooo))))))))))

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: d1975

on TV and no, he is soooooooooooo))

Yes, for your whim, they will draw anything .. [media = http: //]

[maximum 8]

Quote: svp67

In Belarus, the next stage of testing of the 9A33-1B Osa anti-aircraft missile system, modernized by Belarusian specialists, has passed.

Yeah ... We even can not or do not want to provide the closest ally with new models of military equipment, in the right quantities. Sadness
Although happy for the squabs. Well done, work hard, and God will bring you good luck and success

We can’t? Last year we delivered the latest Tor-M2 to Belarus. Google. By the way, Tor-M2 with a range of 15 km and an altitude of 10 km has 16 missiles and shoots in motion.

[maximum 8]

Here is a reference for deliveries of the latest Tor-M2 to Belarus.
https://topwar.ru/150436-belorusskie-zenitchiki-poluchili-pjatuju-partiju-zrk-tor-m2.html

[Alexga]

"delivered the newest Tor-M2 to Belarus." I will clarify, they did not deliver, but sold. By the way, for 2 billion American rubles for a battery set. Charity, so to speak !!!

[Lannan Shi]

Quote: svp67

Yeah ... We can’t or don’t want to provide new models of military equipment in the right quantities.

Are they definitely allies to us? Something, as I recall the talk about the base of the aerospace forces in Belarus. Something like alliance did not smell there.

[loki565]

What problems buy Torah, Shell, and there will be no freebies anymore, the USSR is over. Although the United States is better off if you do not want to buy a Petriot and F35 you get sanctions)))

[AlexG83]

Quote: svp67

Yeah ... We even can not or do not want to provide the closest ally with new models of military equipment, in the right quantities. Sadness

Provide no problem. Is the problem a bit different?

[D16]

Although happy for the squabs. Well done, work hard, and God will bring you good luck and success

They do this in order to earn money on the modernization of Os in those countries that cannot buy Torah-Armor.

[loki565]

So you also have Arrow10, also wasps wanted ???)))

[Lieutenant Senior]

In the 2nd AK only a division, but this is not enough.

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Lieutenant Senior

Good complex, we would have it in the Donbass

Interestingly girls are dancing .... 4 pieces in a row! And where are those 8 (10) "pieces" "Os" that were allegedly captured by the militia near Ilovaisk? By the way, such infa also "ran" that in the warehouses of the Lugansk anti-aircraft missile regiment 2 "shabby" SAM "TOR" were found, for which they urgently undertook to repair ...

[YOUR]

Nothing has been written about solving the problem with the most important drawback. The main disadvantage of the Osa air defense system is the long reaction time - 26 seconds.

[maximum 8]

So is it just upgrading the old SAMs Wasp or Belarusians make their missiles and radar to them?

[Bongo]

Quote: maximum 8

So is it just upgrading the old SAMs Wasp or Belarusians make their missiles and radar to them?

https://topwar.ru/139810-sostoyanie-sistemy-protivovozdushnoy-oborony-stran-uchastnikov-dogovora-o-kollektivnoy-bezopasnosti-chast-1.html
The state of the air defense system of the countries participating in the CSTO (part 1)

[YOUR]

They do everything. It does not advertise, but Belarus supplies weapons to our army quite a lot. And in the world list of arms importers, they are in 18th place. They mainly specialize in the modernization of old Soviet equipment.
Modernization is not something invented or replaced, but the rest is all left old. Understood everything to the frame. Actually, they do the same for us and most likely all over the world.
Old parts are defective what can be left are left to be deemed unfit to replace. Or replace with similar equipment but on a different element base. Concerning radio electronics. For the S-125 air defense systems, mobile launchers were made, improved to such an extent that it became movable from the cart. Deployment time from a few hours was reduced to tens of minutes.
He cited as an example of modernization. They produce a large number of optoelectronic systems. Which are in civilian performance, even in the United States go, under the brand name Yukon.
They have been making their missiles for a long time.

[loki565]

Yeah, this C 125 is still a bandura, and the firing range is slightly larger than the shell

[YOUR]

Cheap and reliable weapons. So the F-117 reminder in Yugoslavia was shot down precisely by the S-125 missile.
In third world countries there are a sufficient number of such air defense systems, so they are modernized to fit modern conditions.

[loki565]

F 117 do not overestimate this subsonic iron, it’s not for nothing that they quickly wrote it off, but they still fly on some F16. By the way, the bikes used to bring him down, there are a lot of MiG29 and KUB and S125, who say that they shot down by visual guidance and did not use the radar.

[YOUR]

The difference between the S-125, S-75, S-200 from the modern ones is that they are single-channel in purpose. In particular, C-125 2 missiles on one target can direct. Otherwise, their characteristics are basically the same.

[prosto_rgb]

Quote: loki565

Yeah, this C 125 is still a bandura, and the firing range is slightly larger than the shell

2 times the height
And the 5V27 (V-601P) missile with a warhead 5B18 weighing 72 kg.
Noble beast!

[Roma 1977]

Missiles in Belarus do not.

[YOUR]

They do. Missiles for the MLRS "Polonaise" with a range of up to 300 km, produce their own ATGM, their own disposable grenade launchers.

[Roma 1977]

No. Missiles MLRS "Polonaise" - Chinese. ATGM - Ukrainian. To make your own rockets, you need to build a factory. And the plant is not being built, because there is still no money to re-equip the army. And all these developments are an attempt to interest foreign buyers. But even in this case, the circulation will be small, so there is no point in producing ammunition from scratch. It's easier to buy from the Chinese, re-stick the nameplate and sell it as "Belarusian".

[YOUR]

I could not say anything about changing the nameplates.

[Roma 1977]

The Chinese ammunition has been modernized, of course, in Belarus. But this is a piece phenomenon. There is no question of any rearmament of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bashkortostan on "Polonaises" or the launch of production of missiles for this MLRS. Not the scale of the country. One MLRS battery as a demonstration unit for foreign customers.

[YOUR]

Once again, I can’t say anything really about this. There are a lot of materials on the network, but they contradict each other great.

[Bypassed]

You won’t run into every shot in China. For a long time in China conducted experimental firing rockets made in Belarus. Received approval. On Belarusian sites there is a lot of information on Polonaise. The equipment level is already 95 - Belarusian for a missile for 300 km. There is a special plant in Belarus. Belarus is already shipping finished products. Mr. Aliyev is very pleased.

[YOUR]

This special factory is called Caliber.

[Roma 1977]

There is another plant nearby. "Belarusian" SUVs "Geely" makes. By the same principle.

[Roma 1977]

Of course I am satisfied. Pays money for a good weapon. That's how much he ordered, so much they did to him. Unlike the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus.

[prosto_rgb]

Quote: Roma-1977

No. Missiles MLRS "Polonaise" - Chinese. ATGM - Ukrainian.

Yes

[Bypassed]

As well as off-road combat vehicles (swamps), combat robots and drones, including the Kamikaze types

[YOUR]

A supplement about a year ago here such an article was https://topwar.ru/135908-belorussiya-gotova-oboyti-rossiyu-na-mezhdunarodnom-rynke-vooruzheniy-s-sistemami-pvo-i-rszo.html

[sivuch]

Provided that there is only one BM, no target control is received, and the target may appear from any direction.
I had a alignment of what the reaction time consists of, if interested, I can search. Or Sergey (Bongo) will be able to find - I sent him.

[Nikolaevich I]

In general, "Wasp" is a good air defense complex and now ... with good anti-missile capabilities ... After the collapse of the USSR, 18 complexes were in service with Greece (NATO) ... (the former GDR ...) Around the same time the complexes were modernized at the "request" of the Greeks ... I don't remember the name of the modernization program ... you have to look at your place ...

[Lapunevsky]

From how many kilometers can the AN-64 Apache Helferi attack this Osa air defense system? Obviously no more than 9 km. True, he will find it from 14-12 km. If there is no other target designation. This means that the updated "Wasp" of Belarusians is perfectly sharpened, including for the destruction of the Apaches, for example.

[Kaw]

In Russia, we have a small number of Torahs and Shells and many obsolete Os. In the event of a large-scale war, we will actually be left without military air defense. Old Wasps do not see targets with low ESR; they have a maximum lesion height of 5 km. This is a junk.
Why don't we upgrade our Wasps? Only modernization is needed clearly deeper, put on them radars from the M2 Tori, increase the range and number of channels, at least to two.

[sivuch]

At the expense of detecting small targets, you are mistaken, as well as with the height of the lesion. And the Kupol residents have long been pushing their modernization to their native Moscow region, but so far without much success.