Black Sea as a water area of ​​the new war

47
The official goal of the joint exercises of Georgia and NATO that took place on April 5-6 was to increase the level of compatibility and interaction of the coast guard of Georgia with the naval forces of the NATO bloc. On the part of the North Atlantic Alliance, there was a “hodgepodge” of the military courts of Romania, Turkey, the Netherlands and Bulgaria. The Georgian fleet was represented by the coast guard boats P-23 Ochamchir and P-25 Dioskuria. Georgia has neither the means nor the skills for its own shipbuilding, so you have to be content with used boats of the US Navy WPB 1340 Jefferson Island and WPB 1345 Staten Island. The main naval maneuvers, during which the skills of boarding were practiced, was the Dutch air defense frigate HNLMS "Evertsen".

Black Sea as a water area of ​​the new war

Dutch air defense frigate HNLMS "Evertsen"




Georgian coast guard boats Р-23 Ochamchir and Р-25 Dioskuria

Maneuvers were not the last. Since April 5, NATO has already conducted exercises with the Ukrainian Navy, adding to them a grouping of ships, numbering a total of 2200 personnel. These sea games will continue according to plans until April 13 and are one of the stages of escalating the situation before the upcoming second round of elections in Ukraine. NATO in the person of Jens Stoltenberg has long announced the main goal of building up a naval group in the Black Sea - raising awareness of the situation in the water area and providing moral and technical support to the "fraternal" fleets of Georgia and Ukraine. In addition, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Alliance, in early April pointed out the readiness of a package of measures aimed at unhindered passage of Ukrainian ships in the Black Sea. The mechanism of this “provision” of the passage is still not fully understood. In the case of direct escort of Ukrainian ships, the chances of serious incidents with the Russian Navy sharply increase. And with US Navy ships, their hands are generally tied with the Montreux Convention of 1936, which prohibits "non-native" warships from being in the Black Sea for more than 21 days. The total tonnage of such compounds is also limited to no more than 30 thousand tons. Actually, such a group is very comfortable for the powerful Black Sea fleet Russia, and it should not cause him any special problems. Therefore, NATO also has to get out, sending the Black Sea flotillas of Bulgaria and Romania, which cannot be called serious players, to the exercises. It is more complicated with Turkey - its fleet is more powerful, but neither NATO, nor even the USA can rely on Erdogan’s shaky devotion.

However, 28 in March, a group of NATO ships entered the Black Sea through the Bosphorus, including the Canadian frigate HMCS Toronto (Halifax type), the Spanish frigate ESPS "Santa Maria", and the previously mentioned HNLMS "Evertsen" from Holland. The squadron was also joined by the Turkish frigate TCG "Gelibolu", which was the American frigate USS "Reid" (FFG-30) of the class "Oliver Hazard Perry". Already 1 of April, this whole company was in Odessa and at the beginning of the month took part in small maneuvers with the remnants of the Ukrainian fleet. Pre-ships visited the Danube Giurgiulesti in Moldova, where the locals met the NATO sailors very cordially. A visit to the port, by the way, was the first in stories NATO.




Canadian frigate HMCS Toronto

The situation in the Black Sea will obviously remain: NATO ships will continue to cruise off the Russian coast as part of the rotation. What steps is Russia taking in response to this? Firstly, the NATO group is under constant surveillance of the new naval ships Ivan Khurs and Vasily Bykov.




Patrol ship "Vasily Bykov"


Intelligence "Ivan Hurs"

This is the first line of defense - it is their silhouettes that the opposite side of the sailors see through binoculars. "Ivan Khurs" is an average reconnaissance communications vehicle and the first in a series of ships of the 18280 project. The vessel is designed to provide communications and fleet management, radio intelligence and electronic warfare. "Hurs" is able to monitor the work of onboard air defense systems of NATO ships, as well as, if necessary, to jam their electronic equipment. The patrol "Vasily Bykov" of the 22160 project serves in this pair as a power support due to the presence on board of the launcher of the Caliber-NKE cruise missiles. In addition, the Bulls has a Ka-27 helicopter on deck. Secondly, the Black Sea Fleet together with the FSB border service organizes exercises aimed at repelling the aggression of the NATO squadron in the area of ​​the Crimean Bridge and the Kerch Strait. The program includes artillery firing and air strikes against surface targets. Practicing the skills of seizure of violating vessels by special forces using boarding methods and landing. In early April, a large-scale training alert was announced in the land units of the Southern Military District and the coastal units of the Black Sea Fleet. In response to the start of the April 12 8 exercises of the NATO naval group Sea Shield 2019 (“Sea Shield”), the coastal defense divisions “Ball” and “Bastion” are on high alert. Officially, the NATO members, these maneuvers indicate how long planned and in no way connected with the elections in Ukraine. However, in the “Square” itself they say that the squadron will stay in the Black Sea until the end of the elections, and maybe even longer.

In the event that the Black Sea nevertheless becomes the water area of ​​a new conflict, Russia has every chance of getting out of it as a winner. No country in the region has enough power comparable to the Black Sea Fleet. Not less than 6 frigates, 6 submarines with Caliber cruise missiles, as well as 8 missile boats with Termit and Mosquito anti-ship missiles. In addition, several landing ships and 8 anti-submarine ships. Ukraine possesses of serious weapons only the Hetman Sagaidachny frigate, and one missile boat of the Priluki 206MR project without missiles.


Turkish frigate TCG "Gelibolu"

Only Turkey can theoretically oppose our fleet with something: 13 submarines, 16 frigates, 8 corvettes and 16 missile boats. But Erdogan is now hard to call a close friend of the United States and NATO, so the Turkish fleet will rather formally fulfill the duties assigned to him by the Alliance and will not provoke Russia. In addition, all ships that wish to go through the Bosphorus should notify Turkey of this in 15 days, which allows the Russian Navy to win a lot of time. The 4 frigate and 2 corvette are the main forces of the Bulgarian Navy, which puts them in a number of auxiliary squadrons in the event of a big war. Romania has a little more - the 4 frigate and 6 corvettes with a small handful of missile boats and minesweepers. Actually, for a full-fledged unwinding of the conflict, which could force Russia to make room in the Black Sea, it is necessary, at a minimum, to revise international treaties of almost a century ago. And there is no sanction for NATO countries here.

Based on:
ng.ru
kommersant.ru
korabli.eu
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 9 2019 15: 07
    Conflict cannot be avoided if Nata and the Americans have not yet all brains dried up, the worst thing is that this can lead to World War 3.
    1. +13
      April 9 2019 15: 35
      quote from article - "The patrol "Vasily Bykov" of project 22160 acts in this pair as power support due to the presence of the Caliber-NKE cruise missile launcher on board»
      there is nothing on Bykov but artifacts ... what calibers ??? .... maybe there are also poplars and sparklers ??
      1. -1
        April 9 2019 16: 26
        Patrol ship "Vasily Bykov" project 22160
        Artillery weapons: 1х57-mm artillery A-220M.
        Anti-aircraft missile: 1 turret anti-aircraft missile launcher "Bending"; 8 MANPADS 9K38 "Needle".
        Additional weapon: 2X14,5-mm naval thumb machinegun.
        Additional armament installed on the customer's request: 1 SAM "Shtil-1" with two modular PU 3С90Е.1; 1 integrated caliber-NKE rocket system.
        Anti-sabotage weapons: 2 grenade launcher complex DP-65; 1 GAS Pallas Dive Detection.
        Sources: www.korabli.eu
        1. +8
          April 9 2019 16: 27
          Quote: Evgeny Fedorov
          Additional weapon: 2X14,5-mm naval thumb machinegun.
          Additional weapons installed at the request of the customer: 1 Shtil-1 air defense system with two modular launchers 3S90E.1; 1 integrated caliber-NKE missile system.

          this equipment is neither on Bykov nor on serial and is unlikely to be on the rest of the series
          1. -2
            April 10 2019 12: 28
            Who said no, you personally reported?
            1. +4
              April 10 2019 12: 30
              Quote: 16329
              Who said no

              commander in chief
              Quote: 16329
              Did you personally report?

              Yes
              1. -2
                April 10 2019 12: 44
                Come on, drop it, something so uncompromising on your part that takes doubt
                1. +2
                  April 10 2019 12: 49
                  Quote: 16329
                  what takes doubt

                  I do not impose an opinion, but you are too lazy even to read the information in open sources.
                  1. -2
                    April 10 2019 12: 51
                    Open sources have the same value, so whom to trust everyone chooses to taste
                    1. +2
                      April 10 2019 13: 11
                      Quote: 16329

                      Open Source Equal Value

                      ?? belay but they didn’t try to follow the link ...
                      Quote: 16329
                      therefore, whom to choose, everyone chooses to taste

                      I don’t impose on you .... you yourself decided that the bull patrolman is a death star, so it is, but only for you personally, and for those who are in the carriage they will simply laugh at you and those who are with you. There are neither calibers there ... nor air defense (calm1) .. nor GAS ..... acre arty is nothing to threaten the adversary with !!
                      1. -1
                        April 10 2019 13: 19
                        And to the crew, in that case. You should be silent about the real state of the ship’s armament and solve service issues in the appropriate order, if you were personally informed of exclusive information, then I’m happy for you, and internet gossip has the same value.
                        In addition, the issues of armament and combat readiness of the ship are in the competence of the command and are not solved by the discussion of wide sections of the public
                      2. +2
                        April 10 2019 14: 04
                        Quote: 16329
                        And to the crew, in that case. It should be silent about the real state of armament of the ship

                        did you even read news from the GCCs at least once? .... or how did you take part in the fleet - did you read ?? ... This has been announced for a long time !!! and there is no secret here !!!!!
                      3. -1
                        April 10 2019 14: 48
                        It’s been known for a long time that our ships are being handed over with defects, it has always been so
                        Ships will then be upgraded for a long time during operation, and the current state of the ship and its combat readiness - this information should be closed
                      4. +4
                        April 10 2019 15: 00
                        Quote: 16329
                        It’s been known for a long time that our ships are being handed over with defects, it has always been so

                        belay wassat love what are not finished !!!! they are not there according to the project !!! .... there is the possibility of modularity ... you are not at all in the subject but are trying to argue .....
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +7
      April 9 2019 15: 44
      Yes, we need to finish building the remaining three frigates for the Black Sea Fleet, and it would be nice to have six more Warsaw women, why should we go from the Black Sea to Middle-earth, even if they are constantly based there, only the crews should be changed. And in general, the Black Sea Fleet is weak for the Turks, here I do not share the optimism of the author. Well at least RTOs are arriving.
      1. +3
        April 9 2019 16: 36
        Quote: URAL72
        Yes, you need to complete the remaining three frigates for the Black Sea Fleet

        what is this? .... it’s almost gone ....
      2. +12
        April 9 2019 16: 48
        Quote: URAL72
        need to complete the remaining three frigates for the Black Sea Fleet

        They have already been sold to India.
        Quote: URAL72
        , and six more Warsaw women wouldn’t be bad,

        This would be a serious strengthening for the Black Sea Fleet in a situation where today at least 2 boats are constantly located in the Mediterranean Sea, based in Syrian Tartus.
        Quote: URAL72
        And so in general the Black Sea Fleet is weak for the Turks, here I do not share the optimism of the author

        The author writes that our Black Sea Fleet has an advantage over other fleets. Moreover, as part of the Black Sea Fleet, he lists 6 frigates. Is that interesting? In addition to 3 new frigates of the admiral series, the rest of the ships will not be called frigates. In Turkey, he lists 13 submarines, 16 frigates, 8 corvettes and 13 missile boats. And what is our advantage here? In hats ??? If we talk about the advantage of Russia, it’s not in the power of the Black Sea Fleet, but in the aggregate geographical position, the presence of long-range coastal anti-ship systems, the possibility of attracting Tu-22M3 long-range aircraft with anti-ship missiles X-32. In this composition, on the Black Sea, Russia has an advantage over other countries.
        1. +3
          April 10 2019 13: 08
          About the "powerful Black Sea Fleet" in the article - touched. The author distorted sharply with the combat strength. It’s good that he didn’t mention the RRC “Moscow” ... or can she shmalnu from the wall at the foe? Then in general - NATO is in awe.
          1. 0
            April 12 2019 01: 02
            Really can and from the wall. With a range of 700 km, you can even from Rostov. Moscow has a malfunctioning GTA, and not an arms system. Just recently, Ash was shot exactly from the pier. Yes
  2. +7
    April 9 2019 15: 09
    Actually, if anything, then our coastal complexes can do without request Only whether they lie on the rampage of NATO trample.
    1. -14
      April 9 2019 15: 23
      Yes, they will not turn up. Our battle lasers guard the borders. Don't be scared
    2. +2
      April 9 2019 20: 08
      compare coastline firing range and ax firing range
      1. 0
        April 10 2019 12: 11
        Quote: rayruav
        compare coastline firing range and ax firing range

        then you need to take into account the size of the Black Sea ....
      2. -1
        April 10 2019 13: 22
        The combat use of axes in conventional equipment in Syria, in particular, did not show their high combat effectiveness
      3. 0
        April 12 2019 01: 12
        All that is hanging out at the World Cup. Not in service with Axes. The same Turkish frigate in armament is weaker than the old 1135. In addition, it takes time to launch a decent amount of missiles (Subsonic Axes, Onyxes and Volcanoes supersonic) In every small world every launch is visible.
  3. -4
    April 9 2019 15: 15
    Khinkaliids have put all piers into disrepair, sank the boats so that it is not proper to squander, and ukroshumery and so it was not long to show off.
  4. +4
    April 9 2019 15: 16
    The Black Sea is a large puddle and is shot through, it’s not possible to concentrate any powerful strike fleet to threaten our shores. Everything is in the palm of your hand, everything is visible. Only nerves pat
    1. KCA
      +2
      April 9 2019 16: 20
      Yes, what kind of fleet is there to gather for a threat, the author forgot to mention about aviation in Crimea, in Krymsk, about the naval base in Novoros, if necessary, the MiG-31K will fly very quickly, conduct full-fledged combat tests of the "Dagger"
    2. +1
      April 9 2019 19: 58
      100% Aviation of the Southern Federal District and North-Western Federal District + coastal missile systems will quickly sink these vessels if that.
  5. +4
    April 9 2019 15: 16
    Chu ... So the same NATO detachment for the Sumerians, who will be driven to slaughter.
  6. +9
    April 9 2019 15: 20
    World War 3 in a single Black Sea. Oh, these journalists.
    1. +6
      April 9 2019 15: 27
      Quote: Nord2015
      Oh, these journalists.

      Their job is to cast a shadow on the fence. belay
  7. +3
    April 9 2019 15: 21
    Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Alliance Kay Bailey Hutchinson in early April indicated the readiness of a package of measures aimed at unhindered passage of Ukrainian ships in the Black Sea.

    But do they have any obstacles? belay
    Or is it just another "Wishlist" pin of nicknames? recourse
  8. +4
    April 9 2019 15: 22
    amused by modern media) they can deliver the same news for weeks, but under different headlines and reinforcing a feeling of tension! Comrades, look at the transcript of this Hutchison’s speech. Trusting articles published on VO is becoming increasingly difficult. There is an original performance. Everything is said there. Build up aerial reconnaissance.
    And Comrade Fedorov, the author of the article, probably moved here from Zen.
  9. +10
    April 9 2019 15: 38
    The whole article consists of a set of phrases "used, they cannot oppose anything, they are not able to, the remnants of the fleet" - excessive self-confidence has never been good.
    1. +11
      April 9 2019 16: 04
      I agree with the respected Morganom, Japan in 1905 already threw caps too ...
  10. 0
    April 9 2019 15: 59
    If there is a serious disruption, NATO forces will strike from the Mediterranean region, well, but to compare the forces of NATO and Russia ... it's like comparing the power of a wolfhound and a room dog
    1. 0
      April 10 2019 12: 35
      In terms of nuclear power, including tactical means, we are quite comparable, and shooting with conventional means in a serious situation is pointless
      Tactical means will be applied anyway
      Yes, and in each of the theaters we have a local superiority in the ground forces, and it’s silly to fight one fleet with Russia
  11. -10
    April 9 2019 16: 44
    It would be more likely to experience the latest Daggers on prop.ndoskie ships. I hope that they will rush into our strait, violating our border, and an order will be given to use precisely the Mig-31K on NATO missiles. I want to see it Daggers in action
  12. +7
    April 9 2019 18: 48
    Quote: Yevgeny Fedorov
    Patrol ship "Vasily Bykov" project 22160
    Artillery weapons: 1х57-mm artillery A-220M.
    Anti-aircraft missile: 1 turret anti-aircraft missile launcher "Bending"; 8 MANPADS 9K38 "Needle".
    Additional weapon: 2X14,5-mm naval thumb machinegun.
    Additional armament installed on the customer's request: 1 SAM "Shtil-1" with two modular PU 3С90Е.1; 1 integrated caliber-NKE rocket system.
    Anti-sabotage weapons: 2 grenade launcher complex DP-65; 1 GAS Pallas Dive Detection.
    Sources: www.korabli.eu

    You wrote everything correctly. The ship is modular and can be equipped with various weapons. In particular, "Caliber" or "Uranus", 57-mm AU AK-220M or 76-mm AK-176MA. But whether all this is worth it on the "Bykov" - I doubt very much. Much has been said on specialized resources that there is no anti-ship missile on it. And frankly, why should a ship, which should deal with smuggling, incl. 8 anti-ship missiles?

    Quote: URAL72
    Yes, we need to finish building the remaining three frigates for the Black Sea Fleet, and it would be nice to have six more Warsaw women, why should we go from the Black Sea to Middle-earth, even if they are constantly based there, only the crews should be changed. And in general, the Black Sea Fleet is weak for the Turks, here I do not share the optimism of the author. Well at least RTOs are arriving.

    And there is in the SPM where these 6 boats are based. And then, as you listen, in this unfortunate PMTO, they are almost going to place a fleet, at least a squadron ...

    Quote: Simferopol
    It would be more likely to experience the latest daggers on prop.ndoskie ships.

    Voynushki wanted a thermonuclear fool ??? am

    Quote: Simferopol
    I hope that they will rush into our strait, violating our border, and an order will be given to use precisely the Mig-31K on NATO missiles. I want to see it Daggers in action

    And those who give orders, both with them and with us, are adequate people who understand what's what. And some people just want to see it in action: now "Daggers", then "Vanguards", then "Poseidons" with "Caliber" and "Peresvet" in addition. Keep on dreaming in your wet dreams. Rumor has it that from Thursday to Friday some rumors come true ... Dream on and on ... Maybe dreams will come true (in a dream)
    1. 0
      April 10 2019 12: 42
      Specialized network resources and designed to drain misinformation and other games
  13. +5
    April 9 2019 19: 53
    the author about the most powerful Black Sea Fleet is cool and what kind of Moldovan port it is, frigates that climbed the rod or Dniester
  14. 0
    April 10 2019 09: 25
    Quote: rayruav
    the author about the most powerful Black Sea Fleet is cool and what kind of Moldovan port it is, frigates that climbed the rod or Dniester

    On the Danube
  15. +3
    April 10 2019 12: 37
    Quote: 16329
    Who said no, you personally reported?

    If you were looking through serious resources and publications on the topic of this project, you might know that both "Caliber" and "Caliber" are optional ... And it is not necessary that "someone reported" to you. You must be able to work with information ...

    Quote: rayruav
    compare coastline firing range and ax firing range

    These complexes have different tasks. "Axes" are strike weapons against the coast, coastal anti-ship complexes, as the name itself says - against ships. Of course, the range is 4 times less for coastal than for "axes"
  16. +3
    April 10 2019 14: 47
    Only Turkey can theoretically oppose something to our fleet: 13 submarines, 16 frigates, 8 corvettes and 16 missile boats. But Erdogan is now hard to call a close friend of the United States and NATO, so the Turkish fleet will rather formally fulfill the responsibilities assigned to it by the Alliance and will not provoke Russia. In addition, all ships that wish to pass the Bosphorus must notify Turkey in 15 days, which allows the Russian Navy to win a lot of time.


    Author, did you invent this nonsense yourself, or which of the "experts" suggested? You need to heal your head.
    You tell all this to your children - a kind of fairy tale about good-looking burdock-weaklings Turks who will be neutral in relation to Russia!
    Maybe they will believe you!
    Here, such hat-writing articles do not pass! Because there are enough people on the site who can think and analyze what is happening around!
  17. -1
    April 10 2019 15: 06
    You hear, friends of the geyropeytsy, coupled with the exceptional, in the Russian Sea.
  18. 0
    April 11 2019 15: 35
    I’m just dying, these geeks from NATO call Georgia and Ukraine fraternal peoples, and they believe this game with its tongues sticking out.