Large-scale modeling of the Soviet Union. Part of 1

211
Probably we all love to receive gifts. Here, in fact, nothing to ask. It is nice to receive them from colleagues, acquaintances, and even nicer from relatives, because they know you better than anyone else. For example, I was very pleased to receive two gifts from my granddaughter at once on this new year. Previously, this happened to be something pleasant, but not for the soul. This time, to my great surprise, I received two boxes from her at once. In one was the tank "Matilda" (combined model of the company "Star") in scale 1: 100, in the other fighter "Hurricane" (the same company) in scale 1: 144. “But I never collected planes? - I was surprised. "" Yes, but you always said that you wanted it! - she objected. - And this airplane is small, very “cozy”, it will not take much space. And then I always wanted to see how such models are assembled and painted ... "" And why else a tank? "" A tank? You said that you like “Matilda” ... ”So I had to assemble these two models, and at the same time tell her history large-scale modeling in our country. The story turned out to be very instructive and, having told it, I thought that it would not be uninteresting for the readers of “VO” to “shake the old days” and recall the youth and my early childhood hobbies. Well, in general ... once again think a little about the past.


Miniature diorama "Matilda" on the bridge "from the" Zvezdinsky "set with a tank "Matilda" on a scale of 1: 100. The tank, as you can see, is branded, but everything else is the work of the author. I wanted to "have some fun" ... otherwise you write and write everything ...




Well, this is the above-mentioned “Hurricane” on the scale of 1: 144. I do not know how anyone, but I really liked this modelka. Well, you can do it in just half an hour. To photograph only difficult. We need a special lens, and it is quite expensive for such rare shots.

I got acquainted with scale modeling a long time ago, when I was in fourth grade in 1965. One boy brought a glued-up Yak-18 model to the class, I naturally liked it very much, and I wanted the same for myself. Wanted and ... went to the store, which he called me, went and bought. Of course, I used to drag him in the glue just scary, but ... even in that form, he caused my admiration, and most importantly - you could play with him. Then came the turn of the Mi-10K helicopter (crane helicopter), in which I really liked the propeller blades made of yellow plastic and the black legs of the spider-like chassis and the same wheels.

Gradually, I learned how to glue such models pretty clean, but I didn’t translate decals (decals) into the set, because they were terrible. And then in the same store I suddenly saw a completely different box with the model of the GDR An-24 aircraft manufactured by VEB Plasticart in the characteristic red coloring of the keel and strip along the portholes. And inside there were not only the details cast with amazing quality, and again incomparable with our decal, but also glue, silver paint with a smell ... which seemed to me more beautiful than the fragrance of roses. And the box, and tubes of glue, and all this was some kind of ... "not ours" and a bit cosmic. Not a toy made according to the principle - “You, baby, will do for you,” but “a small piece of real art.” The prices of the models were from quite acceptable for me 60 kopecks for the MiG-21 and Saab J-35 Draken to completely unaffordable 3,50 and 4 rubles for the Tu-144, Trident and Vostok-1. Saab J-35 Draken on the scale of 1: 100 shocked me with the fact that I first saw a modern combat aircraft "from there", so unusual futuristic outlines, and even with such beautiful identification marks - three crowns in a blue circle. Of course, they could be painted camouflage, and they would be even more interesting, but I was just afraid of that. I did not know what colors they need to paint, and they were not for sale. That is why he preferred the GEDE, already painted in silver, or requiring a minimal additional paint from the modeller. It is true that even then I didn’t like that all the models were in different scales. SU-7, for example, MiG-15 and Tu-2 (scale 1: 72) were significantly larger than the MiG-21, that is, what was this “model line” such? I personally did not like it. And yet - the substrate (the base of the decal) was yellowish in color and eventually turned yellow even more. That is, on a white plastic, the numbers on the yellow substrate did not look at all.

Large-scale modeling of the Soviet Union. Part of 1

MiG-21 from the company "Plastikart" - packaging.

I went to the store where they were sold, almost as if to work, so the saleswomen there already knew me and left the new items, because otherwise these models, unlike ours, flew away in the blink of an eye.

In 1968, I saw on sale three ships of the Ogonek factory at once: the Lenin nuclear powered icebreaker, the Potemkin battleship and the Aurora cruiser. I didn’t like the nuclear-powered rover, but the battleship and the cruiser bought right there, all the more so since excellent material was published in Modelist-Designer magazine about this ship with a color reversal, where Potemkin itself and the destroyer № 267 was given in the "Victorian livery", that is, the coloring with a black case, white superstructures and yellow pipes (or rather black and yellow!), And masts.


"Potemkin" ... packaging has changed ...

I didn’t paint them either, but I collected them with all the rigging, for which I pulled the ropes from the sprues from the same models, stretching them over the candle flame.

At the same time, “Ognakovskiy” tanks — T-34, KV-85, ISU-122, ISU-152 and EC-3 — appeared on the market. I assembled them all, but ... I was horrified at the “duplicity” of the T-34, and was surprised at the choice of other models. Why, for example, “Spark” perpetuated precisely KV-85 and EC-3, who did not play any role in the victory, but “missed” KV-1, EC-2, SU-76 and SU-152?


T-34 of the “Spark” plant - “model forever”

By this time, three of our models, the MiG-15, the MiG-17 and the MiG-19, appeared, but ... their scale was different from the scale of the Plastikart, and most importantly, the jointing on them was ... convex, and the stars were printed in outline. And again they differed from the model Yak-25. And I had to sandpaper all three models to bring to mind. Brought And what to paint? It was therefore necessary to turn the same Yak-25 into a Skipjack nuclear submarine with a rubber motor and a propeller from a tin can. I managed to paint it with a nitro-enamel in a black color, since the nitro-enamels in cans had already started to appear on the market. By the way, the "plastic" Mi-2 helicopter was not needed to be painted, as was the An-2 "corncob": the first was green-marsh color, and the second was all aluminum. By the way, today the “plastic” model of this aircraft is on the 2000 market. Rarity, however!


MiG-21 from the company "Plastikart" assembled looked like this.

Then ... then I had no time to do models for a long time, and when I moved from an old private house to a modern apartment in a high-rise building, I distributed those to the neighbors' boys. “A frivolous case for a certified teacher of history and a foreign language,” I thought then.

Then it turned out that, while working as a teacher in Pokrovo-Berezovskaya Secondary School, I took part in two All-Union toy contests, and in both my toys took prizes. And for the last time, in 1980, it was the tank “Berez for Freedom Comrade. Lenin. " It had a large scale, no less than 1: 12. I did not know how to make polystyrene rivets at that time and came up with an amusing technology: the tank itself was all plastic, but where there were rivets on it, it was covered with a sheet of thin brass riveted.

“I got my hands free”, and I prepared a whole series of models for the 1982 competition, where I was invited officially, since by that time I had already worked at the Penza Regional Station of Young Technicians and I had plenty of time. . "Collection" turned out just gorgeous! It was attended by many models from those that for some reason “missed” “Spark” - T-27 wedge, T-26 with two turrets, BT-7 rev 1939, T-34 / 76 mod.1942 ( with “Mighty Mouse Ears”), EC-2 and my pride T-35! In addition, from the details of the two models of the ship Oksidan, which was then made in Tbilisi, I made a model of the ship Tom Sawyer. With such models it was a sin not to take another prize, which I was given - the second, not the first, but the first got a plant with which it was impossible for the “private trader”. They gave me a letter from the Central Committee of the Komsomol and (to the delight of my wife!) A solid prize, and then invited to the editor of TM on the "round table" - to discuss the problems of large-scale modeling in the USSR.


By the way, the photos of all these models appeared on the article's screensaver in TM # 8 for 1984 a year, so you can see them there. It was said in many ways about this article, and people were greatly surprised why in a country where “all the best is given to children”, where patriotic education is paramount, children do not have what the “decaying West” has long ago, that is prefabricated models of their own, domestic, glorious and truly legendary technology, which would bring up in our children and pride in their country, and ... give them the basics of technical education.


Just all my tanks can be seen at the top of the page.


Even then, the TM editorial office timidly hinted that it was immoral to send bright and colorful boxes with a full set of parts and decals to the West, and ours to sell the same models in packaging cardboard, without the most important component, not to mention colors. However, even TM was unable to disclose the “secret” of Novo. I was afraid. Yes, this is understandable, 37-th from the memory was not yet eroded.


But what was written at the end of the article, how its result ... But the editors could not know that the solution to the problem can be found without problems: it is enough to replace state capitalism in the country with private-state one and then we will have everything. Including any models, both own, and from any country of the world.

Yes, but where did all of a sudden in the USSR take molds on the model of a “potential enemy” aircraft, including the same “Hunter”? And it was like this that back in 1932, two Englishmen, Charles Wilmot and Joe Mansour, created a company that began to produce prefabricated plastic aircraft models. At first it was cellulose cellulose, from 1955, polystyrene. Moreover, since 1963, the scale of 1: 72 has become standard for model aircraft that are not too large in size. By 1970, the Frog catalog (for some reason it was called so) included dozens of various models. And very rare models were produced, for example, “Avro Shackleton”, “Martin Baltimore” (and “Maryland”), “Vultee Vengeance”, “Curtiss Tomahawk”, “Blackburn Shark” (and “Skua”), “Bristol 138” and (Beaufort), our Soviet SB-2, Supermarine Attacker and (Scimitar), Armstrong Whitworth Whitley, Gloster Javelin and many, many others.


Typical Soviet-made model packaging for the domestic market (Fairey Swordfish, Donetsk Toy Factory).

But then for some reason the company went bankrupt and began selling equipment for the production of its models. The latest model "Frog" was released in 1976 year and at the same time, namely in the middle of 70-s, the majority of the molds were purchased by the Soviet Union (except for the models of German and Japanese aircraft - that is, the "enemies" that the Revell company bought ). Models of the Frog company began to be produced under the brand name Novo. We were no strangers to copy, so there is nothing to be surprised about. Moreover, they were exported in high-quality “elegant” packaging and with decals, but for internal use they were delivered in a simplified, without decals, and often even without specifying the name of the sample. They wrote on them, for example, like this: “Sea Fighter”, “Bomber”. Well, you can probably not even mention the quality of the cardboard packaging itself. Although the prices 20-30 kopecks were more than democratic. Most of the molds were given to the Donetsk Toy Factory, and the rest to other enterprises with injection molding machines in Moscow, Naro-Fominsk, Baku and Tashkent. Such models could be glued together, but the absence of decals and paints completely crossed out whatever their educational and educational significance.


German "Focke-Fulf-190". For some reason, the British were not afraid to produce models of enemy aircraft. And we, the winners, re-grind 80% of the German divisions on the Eastern Front ... for some reason we were afraid. Afraid of what? "Plastic airplanes"?

I must say that because of my work at the OblSyuT and participation in the All-Union Toy Contest, I constantly had to go to Moscow, and in the assortment room of the USSR Chamber of Commerce and Industry, and at the Toy Institute in Moscow (located in the old church not far from Kazan Station), and the Research Institute of Toys, and the Toy Museum in Zagorsk. In general, I was then thinking about linking my fate with this work, especially since just then my guys became winners of the All-Union "Cosmos" contest, their works received the first gold medals of the VDNKh of the USSR in Penza, so we were happy to meet in all these places , and my boys in all these “cabinets” and scientific research institutes — and I always tried to travel with them — were bombarded with boxes of “Novo” models, and packs of decals, literally lying there on the shelves. It was there that I was told this “story” from “Frog” and “Novo”, and she puzzled me greatly. So it was possible to sell quality models abroad for money, but the same quality models could not be sold to our children? Well, they would sell more, if not everyone would buy them, but at least someone could buy and collect them. Let not the children, well, at least adults. Everything is better than driving the same shit to our children ... But ... of course, nobody gave me the answer to this point of view. That is, there was a slogan "All the best for children," but, like many things, these were largely empty words. It is clear that the children of officials who had access to all import-export, as well as the staff of all these "cabinets" and specialized research institutes had all this, but what about the rest?


And this is how our assembly instructions looked like. Particularly impressive is the "receiver of air pressure."

By the way, when I visited all these research institutes and toy factories, I not only learned a lot of interesting things, but also heard a lot of wonderful aphorisms. So, the chief engineer of one of the large enterprises said to me like this: “Why produce new toys when new children are born every year?” And ... apparently, therefore, the absolutely terrible “fire” T-34 is being produced and is still being sold. In any case, I saw it in stores, only who buys them, when there are models of the Zvezda company, I just cannot imagine!


Box "Novo". In this form, the products on the equipment of the company "Frog" were sent to the "decaying West."


But this is a model of the aircraft from this box, glued, trimmed and photographed by its creator Anton Finitsky. But such beauty could not be done without good colors and ... decals !!!


But these are the Novo boxes interspersed with boxes for Soviet children. As they say - feel the difference!

However, the “toy” problems soon ceased to bother me, because I moved to work at the institute, and then in 1985, I entered graduate school. And it was there that rest for the sake of me and made my first model entirely from polystyrene and also internationally 1: 35. It was the "machine of advanced artillery observers" of the Federal Republic of Germany on the basis of the American BTR M113 according to projections from the magazine Foreign Military Review. I liked the model very much, and I made the second one, already according to the drawings in the Polish magazine “Small Modeling”, after the dissertation was defended. It was an M114 BTR - a reconnaissance vehicle with an 12,7-mm machine gun М2 on the commander's turret - the “machine” is small and very elegant. That's how I, in fact, returned to BTT-modeling. And then came the year 1987, which changed a lot.

To be continued ...
211 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +27
    April 10 2019 18: 18
    Good article! I remembered this period of childhood with a slight sadness ...
    1. +6
      April 11 2019 07: 01
      I collected more than 20 models of aircraft, mainly from the German Democratic Republic of Germany, which were hung on a thin fishing line under the ceiling in my room, simulating aerial combat and civilian flights.
      It was beautiful, all the space under the ceiling in airplanes. Then the institute, the army, work, children - all as it slowly became a thing of the past. The last homemade, strong - La-7 model carved out of wood, painted under camouflage, has long been in children's toys.
    2. +8
      April 11 2019 14: 49
      I started with Mi-6 from Ogonyok, then Aurora, by the way now repackaging is sold here like Potemkin and the Arctic. Then for 2 rubles I bought An-24 from Plastikart, Tempest and away we go ... I still collect, here from the collected over the past 5 years.




      1. +3
        April 11 2019 15: 45
        For a long time I really wanted to collect some "Drying", just because of the beauty of the form ...
        1. +4
          April 11 2019 16: 24
          Quote: Reklastik
          For a long time I really wanted to collect some "Drying",

          For example, the "pipes" have their own beauty, the Su-27/35 family has their own, MiG whistles are also beautiful. MiG-21 is one of your favorite machines, and Yakovlev's "Pterodaktels" of the Yak-28 family? For me, the Tu-154 is still the most beautiful aircraft.
      2. +3
        April 11 2019 16: 28
        Quote: Fitter65
        here from the collected over the past 5 years.

        "Slightly" whistled. Su-17m2 and Su-17m assembled in 2006 ... hi
      3. 0
        April 12 2019 16: 26
        I envy, and I abandoned, there is not enough time.
        1. +1
          April 13 2019 02: 26
          Quote: ultra
          I envy, and I abandoned, there is not enough time.

          So this is a disaster for everyone if previously I made two or three models a year, moreover, not just out of the box, but at a competitive level with alteration of many details and putting them into drawings



          .to now the construction of the level out of the box is sometimes delayed for years. I have already been in the 5th year for the assembled MiG-23MLD from Trump (not the president), but I don’t have to paint all the time ... IL-4 last year assembled the fuselage and lies there, the Su-15TM also waits for it to be assembled, this what exactly I’ll finish.
      4. 0
        April 12 2019 17: 59
        it's just gorgeous!
    3. 0
      April 12 2019 16: 24
      I probably re-read this article about five times. laughing
  2. +11
    April 10 2019 18: 19
    Class, I love all these models good the box itself has been bought up, something has done, something is waiting in the wings. I'm not special at this, but I like horror as much.
  3. +12
    April 10 2019 18: 23
    I would like to add
    which is more valuable than the models themselves were the stickers in the box that drove us crazy
    Thank you for the article good
  4. +12
    April 10 2019 18: 26
    Oh, nostalgia! My first model was Mi-4 of domestic production. Almost all the models that were described in the article were in my childhood, some are still preserved. The most valuable model in my collection is the Tu-144, produced by the GDR. I remember how hard it was to acquire new models; they were terrible in short supply.
    1. Alf
      +3
      April 10 2019 20: 43
      Quote: Raja
      I remember how hard it was to acquire new models; they were terrible in short supply.

      Almost every city had its own market of modelers. In times of time! good
  5. +3
    April 10 2019 18: 34
    and not far from plastic to wood
  6. +6
    April 10 2019 18: 45
    My first models were the Su-7B and the Jaguar with the Tornado, and then there were planes of all ages and ships (including large ones with radio control), and turntables, of the tanks there are only T-34 and Su-152 ...
    1. +3
      April 11 2019 08: 24
      I saw the Su-7B.
      Jaguar and Tornado not seen.
      But I had an F-4 Phantom (among others), hung with missiles and bombs, like a Christmas tree.
      It was very beautiful.
      1. +2
        April 11 2019 15: 04
        Su-7 from Plastikart it was something, I remember it in the OB department stores that I bought in Tolmachevo, the Jaguar in Oktyabrsky, and what was missing on the birch in Novosibir I really served in the North Caucasian Military District in the late 80s, but many Novovsky models in Poland brought friends. I even had NOVO B-17s, wellington, Lancaster, the Tashkent toy factory. Who remembers the huge deficit. For Lancaster, it was possible to exchange Khasin F-15 for lightweight, and if it was also in the NovoExport box ... I remember in 1991 in the summer in Iskitim, in the Children's World F-82 Twin Mustang was put up for sale, in a new export box with decks ... I then bought them all the vacation, then on the Birch Grove with such a fat surrendered ...
  7. +23
    April 10 2019 18: 51
    I ask the attention of the readers of this article, I want to say a little about the topic and about Donetsk.
    In the front-line city, the activity of the Donetsk Military Historical Club is carried out throughout the war. Lovers of bench modeling and history buffs, as far as possible, get together and do this socially useful, historically enlightening, educational work for the younger generation. We have a permanent exhibition, conduct various club and social events. During this time, our models and I even went several times to some cities of the Russian Federation for exhibitions and competitions.
    We are currently organizing our own page, but so far you can get to know us in the u-tube by clicking on the link. We work with amateur equipment and do as we can. We are posting there now our past videos from the programs of the local TKR, but then we will post the videos that are already recorded and edited by our small team in our free time. The quality of our technical equipment is not very ... But the soul is attached.
    I ask all concerned visitors to this site, all lovers of military history, all modelers to visit our page, visit it regularly, and watch all the materials that appear. I ask you to subscribe, discuss the laid out information, advise and offer something of your own.
    You can go to the link:
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMT22pHnJRI4dZ_xkI2UT9Q

    (you can try to enter by typing in a yu-tube, in a video, by searching for "Donetsk military-historical club", programs "From chain mail to armor."
    1. +6
      April 10 2019 19: 05
      What good fellows you are!
    2. +3
      April 11 2019 15: 15
      GOOD FELLOWS !!! By the way, the Donetsk toy factory at one time produced many models from FROG / NOVO, to the vantage of the Mirage III, Canberra, Sea Hawk, Boeing 707, Maryland, Harrier, Barracuda ... True, there was happiness if it was gray, or in extreme cases, green plastic . But brown was everything, no matter what color, after drying, the model gradually began to blush ... Yes, now it’s a pleasure to modeller that you want to buy. And I remember the times when a man Messer turned out of Spitfire in Minsk ...
      1. +1
        April 11 2019 15: 40
        Quote: Fitter65
        And I remember the times when a man Messer machined from Spitfire in Minsk

        - I admit that a talented person can do anything. A bit off topic, but there is something in common: the fascination with the models of combat aircraft at first, with my friends was inspired by the release of the game "IL-2 Sturmovik", not even "Aces in the sky", it was 2001 or 2002. And somehow I went to visit a friend, he completed Messerschmidt 109. Our models were all from Zvezda, we even wrote a letter to them, thank you, they did not answer us. So, about the Spitfire from Messer laughing Taras has this "thin" on the table, and next to it is a new assembled aircraft. And, looking at him, I began to experience an indescribable feeling: I knew what kind of plane it was + this was not the same plane. I saw him in profile. Considered, probably, 20-30 seconds, silently. Confusion was growing - I knew what kind of plane it was, but not by all indications it was not him, it had a fuselage shape, a lantern, an air intake ... familiar and unfamiliar at the same time! But at the same time I was sure that it was Focke-Wulf - 190)))) The result of this hard internal cognitive struggle was the escaped: "Taras, you have some kind of strange Focke-Wulf." Now a friend looked at me in a new way: "Yes, really strange. Moreover, this is Tempest." And then it dawned on me. We didn’t laugh, we laughed for about 10 minutes and remembered this incident for a long time after. The apotheosis of the situation was the conclusion of a friend: "Fucking" Star "Focke-Wulf makes". So yes, from Spitfire Messer could have turned out too laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +2
          April 11 2019 16: 11
          Quote: Reklastik
          So yes, from Spitfire, Messer could also turn out

          He made the real Messershmi TT-109F. You just don’t know what a real modeller is. For example, here is the Su-7BKL model from OEZ (KR) at 1:48

          with some hand


          You can get 3 (three) models that no one is currently releasing

          These are the Su-17, Su-17M and Su-17M2, and with some spending, you can make almost the entire line of Su-17/22


          1. 0
            April 12 2019 15: 49
            Quote: Fitter65
            You can get 3 (three) models that no one is currently producing; these are the Su-17, Su-17M and Su-17M2, and with some spending, you can make almost the entire Su-17/22 line
            What does it suddenly no one releases? 1/48 releases Kiiti Hawk 1/72 releases Ukrainian modelswith. At the very core are Su-17M 1/72 and Su 17 M3 / M4 from Kitty Hawk 1/48
            1. 0
              April 13 2019 02: 00
              Quote: DenZ
              What does it suddenly no one releases? 1/48 releases Kiichi Hawk

              I'm talking about 1:48. At 48 there was one KR that was repackaged, and OEZ and KOPRO (well, this is basically the same thing) now Edward is packing. But again, they call the same plastic names for both the Su-17M4 and the Su-22M4, it's okay they look alike, For the Su-17M3 they gave an insert for the forkil without an air intake and drove a "new" model, but they are the same Su -17M3 also called the Su-22M3, and that's another song. Yes, there are now Su-17M4 and M3 from KN and NV, but again there is no SU-22M / M3, there is no SU-17 or Su-17M. Yes, at 1:72, Modelsvit started producing these machines, but this is the 72nd. And you want a car of the same type on the same scale, especially since no one has a twin ... And about the Su-17M2 and Su-22, you can still only dream that at 1:72, that in your favorite 1:48. So even with the current model abundance, it is not always possible to buy what you want.
  8. +3
    April 10 2019 18: 52
    the ships nevertheless did good!
    1. +4
      April 10 2019 19: 06
      Good, but few!
      1. Alf
        +5
        April 10 2019 20: 22
        Quote: kalibr
        Good, but few!

        Not so little.
        1. Cruiser Essex.
        2. Destroyer Trafalgar.
        3. The cruiser Tiger.
        4. The destroyer Ashanti.
        5. The battleship Royal Sovereign.
        6. The destroyer Ondine.
        7. The destroyer Hiro.
        8. Torquay destroyer.
        9. Tanker Shell Welder.
        10. Rescue boat.
        11. The floating beacon.
        1. +1
          April 10 2019 22: 04
          These are all foreigners! Where are ours? We have that there was no glorious history of the fleet?
      2. +3
        April 10 2019 21: 01
        Quote: kalibr
        Good, but few!

        Not enough, because the country needed a currency.
        In March-April 1971 at the XXIV Congress of the CPSU, it was decided to increase the production of children's toys and goods for technical creativity in the USSR, for which it was also planned to attract Western companies with experience in the production of such goods and the necessary equipment. Fulfilling the decisions of the congress at the end of 1973 in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR), the Donetsk Toy Factory (later the Donetsk Toy Factory, DZI) was commissioned. For the equipment of the factory, in Italy, machines were purchased for the production of dolls, animals, etc.
        Representatives of the British industrial group "Dunbee-Combex-Marx" ("DCM"), who owned the famous model companies "Rovex", "Frog", and since 1967 and the British branch of "Louis Marx & Co., Inc.", entered into negotiations with V / O "Novoexport", and offered to supply equipment to the USSR for the production of various sets for auto and aircraft modeling and figures. The Soviet side did not want to pay for equipment in foreign currency, but preferred to pay with finished goods. To this end, "DCM" set up a subsidiary Novo Toys Ltd., which became responsible for the supply of equipment to the USSR and for the receipt of finished castings, their packaging and sale. A cooperation agreement was signed in August 1975, and then 12 contracts were signed that related to the details of the transaction. The mold molds received from it were not necessarily the payment for the mold. Based on the resource of the molds, their price was determined, and the price of each casting. After full payment of the cost, the mold became the property of the Soviet side, and subsequent purchases of the castings by the British should have been carried out already for the currency.

        In the domestic market, models were sold at 60-80 kopecks, and in the foreign market at 1.5 dollars.

        I had such (bought for rubles).

        a link to a large resolution (a sticker with a price is visible) -
        http://collectair.org/images2/novoseakits4.jpg
        Now they sell such a set for $ 30


        Well and accordingly, many of the aircraft models.
    2. +4
      April 10 2019 19: 59
      Quote: alekc75
      the ships nevertheless did good!

      By the way, yes. And everything was fine with detail. Offhand, I recall the models (of different scales): the battleship Potemkin, the cruiser Aurora, the icebreaker Arktika ... the latter was the most valuable, because a model with the name Leonid Brezhnev was included in the collection.
      1. +2
        April 11 2019 10: 31
        Quote: Paranoid50
        Offhand, I recall the models (of different scales): the battleship Potemkin, the cruiser Aurora, the icebreaker Arktika ... the latter was the most valuable, because a model with the name Leonid Brezhnev was included in the collection.

        "Arctic", by the way, was remembered by an absolutely unrealistic amount of details. Only the doors of the cabins, glued to the hull in all sorts of places, were, EMNIP, over a hundred.
        1. 0
          April 11 2019 16: 38
          Quote: Alexey RA
          only the cabin doors glued to the hull in all kinds of places were EMNIP for a hundred.

          Yes, there are so many along the perimeter of the superstructure ... fellow laughing The tiny helicopter on the site was also remembered.
    3. Alf
      +2
      April 10 2019 20: 16
      Quote: alekc75
      the ships nevertheless did good!

      The most interesting thing is that the molds for the Arctic, Aurora and Potemkin were commissioned by the USSR by 1970 by HELLER, which is why such a strange scale of 1/400.
      1. 0
        April 10 2019 20: 47
        In 92, I bought a prefabricated model of the Lenin icebreaker, an ordinary cardboard box without a picture on the lid, inside there is only an assembly diagram, a brief history and details, and white. Not in the know who the manufacturer is?
        1. Alf
          +4
          April 10 2019 20: 51
          Quote: Petrograd
          In 92, I bought a prefabricated model of the Lenin icebreaker, an ordinary cardboard box without a picture on the lid, inside there is only an assembly diagram, a brief history and details, and white. Not in the know who the manufacturer is?

          Ogonyok, Moscow. The funniest thing is that this model was produced by United in three persons - the Arctic and Brezhnev. By the way, it is still being produced, but only as the Arctic, it is useless for the modern generation to know what "dear Leonid Ilyich" is.
  9. +14
    April 10 2019 18: 54
    Each person’s life develops in his own way, however, the memories of childhood attachments sometimes tear to tears ...
    Vyacheslav Olegovich, thanks for the trip to childhood!
    "Who are these guys that glue models
    Winged creatures made of white paper? "
    "Angels and Airplanes" (group "Underwood")
    1. +4
      April 10 2019 23: 28
      Up to the smell of acetone.

      Yet there is a seal of time. And sounds, and smells, and combinations of words.
      1. +5
        April 11 2019 16: 46
        Quote from Korsar4
        there is a seal of time. And sounds, and smells, and combinations of words.

        Well, on the first two points - objectively. And, here, phrases ... Here is such a thing that for thirty years in the phrase "The boy in the club glued the model" ALL four words have changed the semantic load. laughing
  10. +2
    April 10 2019 19: 14
    Quote: kalibr
    Good, but few!

    in addition to these 3 are still a cruiser and 2 destroyers, but who I do not remember. but definitely not Moscow did
    1. +2
      April 10 2019 20: 26
      Quote: alekc75
      Quote: kalibr
      Good, but few!

      in addition to these 3 are still a cruiser and 2 destroyers, but who I do not remember. but definitely not Moscow did

      Most likely the Donetsk factory, which produced models under the "NOVO" brand.
      Moscow (EMNIP) is "Ogonyok"
      Which cruiser did you have?
      1. This one?

      2. Or this one?
      1. 0
        April 15 2019 07: 43
        Quote: Freeman
        Quote: alekc75
        Quote: kalibr
        Good, but few!

        in addition to these 3 are still a cruiser and 2 destroyers, but who I do not remember. but definitely not Moscow did

        Most likely the Donetsk factory, which produced models under the "NOVO" brand.
        Moscow (EMNIP) is "Ogonyok"
        Which cruiser did you have?
        1. This one?

        2. Or this one?

        Yes, I bought these models!
  11. +5
    April 10 2019 19: 26
    Well here again. Whatever caliber starts to write about, after a couple of lines it starts - what a cool and funky one I am, praise me irresistible. Then he urgently relocates and praises himself with his twins. By its narcissism, the site has already turned into a garbage dump.
    1. +4
      April 10 2019 20: 18
      Darn!!! But Smirnov doesn’t know that half of the 20 million views is all Shpakovsky coming from different accounts!
    2. Alf
      +4
      April 10 2019 20: 22
      Quote: Alceers
      Well here again. Whatever caliber starts to write about, after a couple of lines it starts - what a cool and funky one I am, praise me irresistible. Then he urgently relocates and praises himself with his twins. By its narcissism, the site has already turned into a garbage dump.

      It doesn’t know otherwise.
    3. +5
      April 10 2019 23: 31
      Quote: Alceers
      Then he quickly relogs and with his twinks he praises himself.

      I, as a likely twink (what is this, by the way?) Caliber, testify: this is not true. We do not have any twinks, everything is only natural and on a voluntary basis. smile
      Vyacheslav Olegovich, please tell them that I am me, not you, otherwise they will not believe me. laughing
      1. 0
        April 12 2019 15: 17
        I’ll say, will they believe it? How good is conspiracy theory? EVERYTHING LIES, and you, and I too !!!
    4. +3
      April 10 2019 23: 38
      Quote: Alceers
      Whatever caliber starts to write about, after a couple of lines it starts - what a cool and funky one I am, praise me irresistible.

      But not raving, like Samsonov!
  12. +5
    April 10 2019 19: 32
    The poverty of the kits was not as annoying as their scarcity. I had to buy several models and change by mail with like-minded people - some from Donetsk, some from Moscow ... And the lack of information on what kind of plane it is, etc. created a fierce hunger for information on the history of aviation. That's why I went to an aviation university
  13. +3
    April 10 2019 19: 38
    Very interesting, returned to childhood ... Yes
  14. -2
    April 10 2019 19: 40
    Ahah))) I remember that TM number))) It was just shkolota)
    And yes - there was little desire to collect that graveyard
  15. +1
    April 10 2019 19: 44
    I remember lancaster glued, it was a very cool model, the USSR produced in 85-89. I don’t remember what kind of company I was, but the plane was big, but the little Mustang somehow didn’t like after such a giant. And in other things, we Soviet children were not pretentious, there was nothing to compare with. But the souvenir cars sucks it for sure, I had to compare I've always presented models with something uncle on a cruise ship from abroad (ours was only Zil Kamaz and a seagull, well, also the VAZ 02 looked good.
    1. 0
      April 15 2019 13: 06
      And Niva, and Volga 24?
      1. 0
        April 15 2019 16: 30
        Well, yes, these too. Niva seems to be the first with the Scythian was included.
  16. +7
    April 10 2019 19: 53
    My son all the time when we lived in Leningrad until 1978, and then in Moscow was fond of this modeling. There were models with electric motors. This helped him both in school and then at the Academy. He defended his candidate, then doctoral dissertation. The general director works in the State concern. When we meet, we talk about models, he immediately smiles
  17. +3
    April 10 2019 20: 02
    Thank you recalled childhood, models from the GDR were great I remember TU 95, it was just luxurious, from the domestic ISU 152 with an electric motor and a control panel.
    1. +1
      April 17 2019 01: 42
      Quote: polpot
      models from the GDR were magnificent I remember TU 95, it was just luxurious

      Maybe the Tu-20? He definitely was, he collected it. good
      Quote: polpot
      from domestic ISU 152 with an electric motor and a control panel.

      Oh, the 152nd didn’t get caught, but there was the same IS-3 plan, with two DER (on each side) and a remote control (of course, wired laughing )
      1. +1
        April 17 2019 18: 04
        Thanks for correcting it, maybe it was TU 20, 40 years have passed, especially TU 20 and 95 have one aircraft, I had such an IS 3, only in the version without control.
        1. +1
          April 17 2019 19: 44
          Quote: polpot
          only in the version without control.

          And that means there was a "lightweight" version - I didn't know. When he was able to assemble and "start" the IS-3, and he did go, he did not even believe it. Yes Well, yes, at the age of thirteen it seemed like a mega-achievement of a young modeler. laughing hi
          1. +1
            April 17 2019 21: 19
            Yes, he was collecting in 1984, a beautiful tank.
            1. +1
              April 17 2019 22: 09
              Quote: polpot
              in 1984 collected

              I am in 1985. The happiest time according to current feelings ... hi
  18. +4
    April 10 2019 20: 08
    Thanks a lot! good
    I remembered my childhood ...
  19. +11
    April 10 2019 20: 13
    I read the article and nostalgia came up, probably most of the lovers of models of the Soviet era have the same story: I seemed to read about myself. My mother also bought and was happy: she sits at home, doesn’t rush along the street ... Hobby paved the way to life and profession. I collect models so far ...
    Thank you for the article
    1. +7
      April 10 2019 21: 50
      Well, the article is so-so ...
      The author forgot to mention what kind of "shitty" glue came with the models and in what quantity ...
      And how his lack was compensated for later (in what celluloid from the father’s tablets was dissolved ...) ..
      And that the models painted homemade airbrush
      In the collection at the end of '89 there were about 30 aircraft models.
      1. +5
        April 10 2019 21: 58
        52Well, you're not a romantic person, well, absolutely. And I had over fifty laughing then, as you know, I sculpted in a system of wood.
        I recently dug up a torrent magazine about scale modeling English from 1936 ...
        1. +3
          April 10 2019 22: 08
          Tramp!
          I just then "smoothly" switched to aircraft modeling))) to the "cord" ... MK 17 engine (as much as 17 rubles !!! if memory serves ...) The smell of castor oil and ether with kerosene ... and broken fingers on screws ....
          1. +3
            April 10 2019 22: 28
            Your fellow soldier in the East and my first sidekick were a great master in Cordoba. Now I’ve got carried away with virtual control of real models, says cooler than air combat in KBP ;-)
            1. +2
              April 10 2019 22: 35
              "Rubber" girls?)))) Virtual in the sense?)))) laughing
              1. +5
                April 10 2019 22: 38
                Angry you 52, this is management through Virtual Reality Glasses
                1. +3
                  April 10 2019 22: 46
                  So I say)))) but you can't swing the program, what kind of "virtual" management of your spouse?)) wassat
                  1. +5
                    April 10 2019 23: 02
                    Quote: NN52
                    .. and you can't swing the program, what kind of "virtual" management of your spouse?

                    52 stand in line, for such a program there probably almost the whole VO will line up, well, except for the respected ladies
                    1. +6
                      April 11 2019 11: 24
                      Tramp hi Such a program is written individually for each instance. The period of preliminary preparation for compiling the algorithm is about 25-30 years of continuous observation of the object. Here you can’t do with a universal remote control. request wink Moreover, this period of time is not final and can move to the right. Yes
                      1. +6
                        April 11 2019 12: 38
                        Dear, you have just destroyed hopes and aspirations for a predictable, I would even say a programmable, bright future. I must probably suggest 52 remove stress, otherwise we hoped so laughing
                      2. +3
                        April 11 2019 13: 06
                        Maybe not tell him? As if with stress relief, I did not go too far. drinks
                      3. +2
                        April 11 2019 13: 30
                        It’s somehow not in patsansky, are you participating? Then I’m going to the store, dear snack from you, and 52 there will be a surprise good drinks at the same time and talk about models
      2. +2
        April 11 2019 16: 43
        Quote: NN52
        And that the models painted homemade airbrush

        Well, here I do not agree. And the famous BELAUS? Yes, it cost 10 rubles. 50 kopecks But the compressor was a problem in general, I’m from the old refrigerator + the engine from the washer + receiver from the 131st ... This is only then a decommissioned compressor with PPR, 27V400Hz, for which my friend made a power supply ... there were times. And now ... a set, I took on ALI, 12 Airbryusha, plus a compressor Partner with a receiver for 8 liters ....
  20. Alf
    +6
    April 10 2019 20: 14
    the lining on them was ... convex,

    External or external, Mr. Modeler.
    However, even TM “Novo” could not reveal the “secret” of the company. I was afraid. Yes, this is understandable, the 37th from memory was not yet weathered.

    Lord, why are you so afraid of everything, Mr. Shpakovsky. No one was afraid of any "bloody gebney" at that time. It's just that the "top" decided that it would be cheaper.
    Frog company (as it was called for some reason)

    FROG is an abbreviation meaning Take Off Straight from the Earth. I mean, the plane flies, but the model does not.
    By the way, on the boxes of FROG a penguin was painted, i.e., a bird, but one that does not fly.
    But then, for some reason, the company went bankrupt and began to sell equipment for the production of its models.

    It was not FROG that went bankrupt, but the ROVEX concern, which included FROG, by the way, before the bankruptcy proceedings, the FROG branch was just profitable.
    Models of the company "Frog" began to produce with us under the brand name Novo. We were not used to copying, so there was nothing to be surprised at.

    And here "we were used to copying"? Mr. "expert in modeling", in 1975 a decision was made to purchase equipment for the production of replica models. The contract signed with FROG implied that the settlement with the British side would be made not in currency, but in ready-made models, and after a certain number of releases, all molds would become the property of the USSR. So no one copied, they released it absolutely legally.
    By the way, such models as SB, LA-7 were ordered by the Soviet side, like Anatra, IL-2, LaGG-3, LA-5FN, which at the time of bankruptcy were in varying degrees of readiness.
    So it was possible to sell high-quality models abroad for money, but the same quality models cannot be sold to our children?

    Well, this is outright bullshit. Where, then, in our stores could you find exactly "kits" with a NEW box, a NEW instruction and decks? Yes, they were less common, but they were not a curiosity.
    Box "Novo". In this form, the products on the equipment of the company "Frog" were sent to the "decaying West."

    By the way, the box you quoted is an outright fake. Neither FROG nor NOVO put photo of models on the boxes, and there have never been a NOVO box on Vixen.
    To be continued ...

    Better not. You should not write what you do not understand.
    1. +3
      April 11 2019 17: 03
      Quote: Alf
      However, even TM “Novo” could not reveal the “secret” of the company. I was afraid. Yes, this is understandable, the 37th from memory was not yet weathered.

      Lord, why are you so afraid of everything, Mr. Shpakovsky. No one was afraid of any "bloody gebney" at that time.

      M-Hobby Magazine 1-93 details the history of FROG. The magazine "Wings of the Motherland" of the year 1986-87 was painted with catalog numbers, what they mean and which factory produces. Just comrade. Shpakovsky at one time was an ardent Comrade, now he has become a sufferer from the Comrades ...
      1. 0
        April 12 2019 15: 20
        How well did you say ...
    2. 0
      April 12 2019 15: 56
      Quote: Alf
      By the way, the box you quoted is an outright fake. Neither FROG nor NOVO put photo of models on the boxes, and there have never been a NOVO box on Vixen.
      I agree. Boxes and "petals for bags with Novo models were printed in Finland as far as I remember
  21. +5
    April 10 2019 20: 25
    A couple of the airplanes that I presented were.
    1. Alf
      +3
      April 10 2019 20: 35
      Quote: Kars
      A couple of the airplanes that I presented were.

      What people, I’m not afraid to say, Veterans, returned to us! hi
  22. +4
    April 10 2019 20: 38
    I had a very rare in our latitudes T-35 from the Ukrainian ICM at the time.
    Well, yes, the Star now also made its T-35, but then it was a rarity (and wildly dear) - the series was small. Plus, over 750 parts, even caterpillars were recruited from individual plastic links. The suspension was also very detailed, although in theory they could have saved, since it was hiding behind the bulwarks anyway. But they didn’t. Hefty box, a bunch of sprues ...
    1. Alf
      +3
      April 10 2019 20: 41
      Quote: Kuroneko
      but then it was a rarity (and wildly expensive)

      Yes, on the Rock, before the appearance of the Star, they asked for 5 tyrov for him, that's true, did they get a question.
      1. +1
        April 10 2019 20: 46
        Quote: Alf
        Yes, on the Rock, before the appearance of the Star, they asked for 5 tyrov for him, that's true, did they get a question.

        I once bought for 700 with something rubles (I don’t remember a year already, but apparently somewhere right after the denomination) - but then it was DORAGA! Tamiya was pretty cool then a maximum of 400 rubles and a penny cost, the box was in I’ve been in a few years (for this I have to sit down with full dedication of all my strength and in the right mood, but it didn’t work out), then for the sake of laughter I somehow gave it to a friend who worked just in a small shop selling minchies of warhammers, rings, other table and, essno, military models on the window for a couple of weeks. He said they turned to him with the desire to buy for 4 pieces. And it was somewhere in the middle of zero.
        PS I suspect that I bought it at a discount - when I discovered it, I discovered that someone with an impatient pen had cut a bag with gates with a scooter so that a long cut remained on one of the bulwarks. But there was nowhere to go, only one instance in the entire city of Che was then found.
        1. Alf
          +2
          April 10 2019 20: 56
          You're in luck. The fact is that before the ICM, the T-35 was produced by the Moldovan company AEP. These were "firewood", in which even the main tower did not turn completely, the MTO roof interfered.
          1. +1
            April 10 2019 20: 59
            About the existence of the T-35 from AEP was not in the know at all (then no one had the Internet). We hucksters did not respect this company at all. And from ICM is a very high-quality model. Quite minimalistic in the internal rigging of the case, but at least the engine was, which is already good.
            The Early Star is hardly any different from this AEP. Until now, trembling takes, as I recall her ISU-152. There the dopilka reached even the use of mayonnaise jars. = _ =
            1. Alf
              0
              April 10 2019 21: 11
              Quote: Kuroneko
              The Early Star is hardly any different from this AEP.

              Well, I don’t know, I have the whole line of the initial Star gathered at once. The only, frankly shitty T-60 was assembled, but it was not a Star development, but a Polytechnic.
              1. +1
                April 10 2019 21: 17
                ISU-152 was a real ass, so what, but I remember that.
                Here is this dopped version - maybe the norms.

                But the early one is full alles.

                There, not only the armored tube stood crookedly on the lower part, with gaps in millimeters, but there were also holes in the fenders on the sides, from below (where the wheelhouse extends beyond the hull). Economists, their mother. The quality of the plastic tracks also depressed.
                And the sea of ​​flash.
                1. Alf
                  +1
                  April 10 2019 21: 21
                  Quote: Kuroneko
                  Economists, their mother.

                  Yes, what about the Zvezdists? These are all handicrafts of sultry Italian masters from Italeri. If memory serves, the first actually star model from the BTT was the T-26.
                  1. 0
                    April 10 2019 21: 23
                    I know that the Star started with the used form-matrix from Italeri (first, chamolytics, emnip). But this does not justify her. That rubbish was ISU.
                    By the way, Star’s attempts to burst into the desktop sector also touched. The rules were spelled out very filthy, with a bunch of possible double interpretations .. About minks and I’m not saying, not because they are good / bad (although NOT good). Just if you can’t even write the manual normally, don’t take it.
                    1. Alf
                      0
                      April 10 2019 21: 38
                      Quote: Kuroneko
                      By the way, Star’s attempts to burst into the desktop sector also touched.

                      From a business point of view, right, they want to occupy all the niches. In terms of quality, zilch.
                      1. 0
                        April 10 2019 21: 41
                        Quote: Alf
                        the first actually star model from the BTT was the T-26.

                        They say noocin too.
                        I did not collect, and not so hardcore in matters of realism, but still - the first pancake turned out to be natural.
                        https://www.dishmodels.ru/gshow.htm?p=5189
                        Quote: Alf
                        In terms of quality, zilch.

                        That's right, that's why everyone continues to buy wahu, and some craftsmen even cast / grind the self-made figures of Classic BattleTech (if anything, I'm a long-time fan of furs).
                      2. Alf
                        +2
                        April 10 2019 21: 51
                        Quote: Kuroneko
                        and individual craftsmen - even cast / grind the self-made figures of Classic BattleTech (if that, I am a longtime fan of furs).

                        Masochists! laughing
                        Quote: Kuroneko
                        They say noocin too.

                        For millimeters, I also do not drive. For me, casting quality and collectability are much more important. Both of the T-26s were normal, with all the raspberries spoiled only by vinyl tracks. In general, they were normal, soft, but short, the assembled T-26 rode on them like a box.
                        But Armata is a real masterpiece! When I started assembling, out of habit, I prepared files, skin, knives. Not useful! He bit off and glued, it was even somehow suspicious, everything went too well. But, as the Parkinson’s Law states, the absence of minor troubles in the process is compensated by one big nuisance in the final, a fly in the ointment nevertheless caught. Long fucked with the installation of active defense in the tower. He expressed all the mats I knew and invented several new ones, but stuck it.
                      3. +1
                        April 10 2019 21: 57
                        Gut I hope the FSB agents with guns at the ready were not standing over the designers of the uniforms. ^ _ ^ I don’t buy a New Star. I just can’t - I have 11 cats in the hut, yesterday another kitten appeared (and will soon give birth). Already not to that, alas. Cats to me, damn it, arrange the assembly.
                        As for CBT, there is an alternative to playing on the Mechwars server, as part of the global campaign of the Fourth War for the Legacy of 3025. A global add-on to the MegaMek CBT network desktop client.
                  2. 0
                    April 11 2019 17: 53
                    Quote: Alf
                    Yes, what about the Zvezdists? These are all handicrafts of sultry Italian masters from Italeri.

                    And the Dragon (DREGON), the same Italian models swelled up, their Su-24/24 Star still drives, one is glad that at least the MiG-29 and Su-27 series from Nakotne have finished (?)
    2. 0
      April 11 2019 17: 10
      Quote: Kuroneko
      I had a very rare in our latitudes T-35 from the Ukrainian ICM at the time.

      I do not know where it was rare. Even if we have it in Komsomolsk-on-Amur in the "Planet" (then we still had such a chain of bookstores) at Pobeda, which was on Dzemgakh back in 2006.
      1. Alf
        +1
        April 11 2019 19: 33
        Quote: Fitter65
        I don’t know where he was rare.

        In my Samara, the T-35 was not a curiosity, but still not an everyday consumer goods, usually the price scared buyers away. And since they don’t buy much, we didn’t carry much, usually only on order.
  23. +5
    April 10 2019 21: 01
    To the author, a huge THANKS, for the article, indeed, I returned to my childhood. My hobby for prefabricated models began at the age of 7, when my mother bought a MiG-3, then they lived in Narva in Estonia, there then (80s), I often came across models in stores, incl. and "foreign" pr-va. This hobby became for life. Family life and work, unfortunately, do not allow me to engage in this hobby even now (I have more than 120 models of them, removed until better times, I hope to do them in retirement), the only thing that I won from my wife was that I collected the entire collection of aircraft from DeAgostini -series "Legendary aircraft" and placed them as a result of protracted and "bloody" battles laughing on bookshelves, with the condition that I will do the cleaning myself in the living room.
    I will wait for the continuation, creative success to you.
    1. +2
      April 10 2019 22: 33
      Oh, Alexander! How familiar ... When I was engaged in the TANKOMASTER magazine, I assembled a collection of 100 tanks in 1: 35. The shelves are glazed ... But ... spouse, mother, grandmother, daughter ... set an ultimatum: we do not want to live in a tank warehouse. And in 1998, after the exhibition of all these models in Penza, he sold everything. True, then they lived well for a whole year ... So now I have no time for collections. And the tank on the bridge ... gave it to a model mate ... Be your house with an attic in 150 squares ... But what is not, is not.
    2. 0
      April 11 2019 17: 18
      Quote: Petrograd
      My passion for prefabricated models began at the age of 7, when my mother bought the MIG-3, then they lived in Narva in Estonia, then (80 years old),

      Of course, I can forgive your ignorance of the names of aircraft at the age of 7, but in the 80s, no one let out the MiG-3 from the word at all, the first model appeared at 1:72 (in very xxx quality) around 91, and plastic was so bubbly !!! In the 80s, the famous book "MiG-3, LaGG-3, La-5" was published, but there was no model of this aircraft at that time ...
      1. Alf
        +1
        April 11 2019 19: 38
        Quote: Fitter65
        Of course, I can forgive your ignorance of the names of aircraft in the 7-year-old age, but in the 80s, no one let out the MiG-3 from the word at all,

        And you do not admit the possibility that it was a firm model, no one canceled cross-border trade? EMHAR and RED STAR released this model back in the 70s.
        1. 0
          April 12 2019 00: 36
          Quote: Alf
          And you do not admit the possibility that it was a firm model, no one canceled cross-border trade? EMHAR and RED STAR released this model back in the 70s.

          With oh-oh-oh-chen a big stretch. They did not buy them through the Ministry of Trade, but from hands it would be very expensive. If KR-shny Po-2 went for 25-30 more Soviet rubles. Moreover, I remember how one "kid" in the early 80s told how his uncle, a sailor, brought him an IL-76 from Japan in a HUGE box ...
        2. -1
          April 13 2019 17: 41
          Quote: Alf
          And you do not admit the possibility that it was a firm model, no one canceled cross-border trade? EMHAR and RED STAR released this model back in the 70s.

          Vasily-I told what happened in my childhood, when my father came from Finland (he worked on international freight traffic-SOVTRANSAVTO), brought the railway (Germany with a tender locomotive and three cars), when he came to my grandmother in Volkhov LO and showed to the yard guys, shock. In the evening, a district police officer came with a demand to explain where and how this toy appeared. Here in my childhood it was like this, everyone has it differently, I remember something, alas, it’s forgotten, and you suggested (about the icebreaker "Lenin") hi
          1. 0
            April 16 2019 12: 10
            Quote: Petrograd
            when my father arrived from Finland (he worked on SOVTRANSAVTO on international freight transport), brought the railway (Germany with a locomotive with a tender and three cars), when he came to his grandmother in Volkhov LO and showed the yard guys a shock. In the evening, a district police officer came, demanding to explain where and how this toy came from.

            Some kind of stupidity. Of course, I'm not very good at railway modeling, but in the 70s in the magazine "Modelist-Konstruktor" it was told how to automate a railway road, there are schemes for simultaneously moving 2, 3,4 trains. People corresponded, offered an exchange ... YES, during the Soviet Union times, modeling was not cheap, and a lot was in short supply. But the same GDRovskie railway, it was possible to buy in the Novosibirsk Central Department Store, if you were lucky, since they left with a bang, with their not a small price tag. And then the district police officer saw a foreign toy and ran to figure out what and how. You, the Soviet era, do not be stupid, it’s just that the district police officer came to your father with a request for a certain amount of money to bring him the same toy and that's it ...
            1. 0
              April 16 2019 21: 16
              Well, you compared the Novosibirsk Central Department Store and other department stores in large cities (where, as you yourself write, these toys were in short supply) with (in fact) a provincial town in the Leningrad region, where the "Children's World" store also had a railway from it is not clear how decorated iron wagons and a locomotive (you insert the key and, if the spring is not twisted, the "train" will go) along white rails (they were made of white plastic and made up in a circle) and compare with the quality of "foreign". As for bringing toys to my father, mother and grandmother, they did not apply, they asked to bring some clothes and, for the most part, scarce food products, after all, in Estonia it was much better with this.
              1. 0
                April 17 2019 00: 40
                Quote: Petrograd
                Well, you compared the Novosibirsk Central Department Store and other department stores in big cities (where, you yourself write, these toys were in short supply) with a (essentially) provincial town in the Leningrad Region,

                I can compare the Central Department Store in the Ordynskoye district center in the same NSO, where various GDR models also appeared periodically, and the same railway, although at a price of 10-15 rubles, it was the lust of many boys, but I was more interested in aviation and cars in 1 : 43. therefore, when we came to the district center (usually to the house of pioneers), then in Zarnitsa, or on other matters, we always went to the toy department. Yes, and in the summer from the city to the grandparents, the boys came and with toys cooler, such as radio-controlled aircraft and ships, and the district police did not come to any of them, was not interested in what and where ...
                1. 0
                  April 17 2019 01: 23
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  I can compare the Central Department Store in the Ordinskoye regional center in the same NSO

                  NSO is what?
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  various GDR models

                  The GDR and the FRG were not quite united at that time, and there were different countries. I am turning to you, it was the MiG-3 that was my first team model, on a scale of 1:72. Tell me honestly, are you bored and need to chat?
                  1. 0
                    April 17 2019 12: 13
                    Quote: Petrograd
                    NSO is what?

                    Novosibirsk region. So before abbreviated wrote.
                    Quote: Petrograd
                    The GDR and the FRG were not quite united at that time, and there were different countries.

                    Well, yes, and if you had a toy from Germany, then a district police officer would definitely come to you.
                    Quote: Petrograd
                    I am turning to you, it was the MiG-3 that was my first team model, on a scale of 1:72.

                    Well, it was and was, different rare things can always be found ...
                    Quote: Petrograd
                    Tell me honestly, are you bored and need to chat?

                    Well, I think that% of commercials 90 are on the Internet just for such a compelling reason ... Well, on the other hand, you asked the question, how should a well-mannered person have to answer him hi
      2. -1
        April 13 2019 17: 20
        Quote: Fitter65
        Quote: Petrograd
        My passion for prefabricated models began at the age of 7, when my mother bought the MIG-3, then they lived in Narva in Estonia, then (80 years old),

        Of course, I can forgive your ignorance of the names of aircraft at the age of 7, but in the 80s, no one let out the MiG-3 from the word at all, the first model appeared at 1:72 (in very xxx quality) around 91, and plastic was so bubbly !!! In the 80s, the famous book "MiG-3, LaGG-3, La-5" was published, but there was no model of this aircraft at that time ...

        It is very difficult to confuse something, but MIG-3 / MiG-3 was written on the box and in the assembly diagram (with the letter "and" in lowercase. The plastic was gray, I tell you what happened.
        1. 0
          April 13 2019 17: 48
          Quote: Petrograd
          It is very difficult to confuse something, but MIG-3 / MiG-3 was written on the box and in the assembly diagram (with the letter "and" in lowercase. The plastic was gray, I tell you what happened.

          Well, not everyone was so lucky to get the MiG-3 from a Western company with an inscription in Russian
          this is true repack of the late 90's. It’s just that in the days of the USSR, modellers had their own channels for acquiring models. They bought through Poles, Czechs ... but to be honest, even talking to modelers in Stargard Szczecin, when he served in Poland (1983-1988) about the MiG-3 from this I didn’t stutter the manufacturer, it was very rare even in Poland, so I’m silent about how much such a box cost in the Union. No, of course the rich have their own quirks, I also allowed myself to buy a Hasegava F-80V at the end of 15 for 120 rubles, well or Fujimovsky Phantom for 200r, therefore, without question, only the MiG-3 name and even with a capital letter have never been written by Western companies, even in modern times they don’t bother with this, But our manufacturers have mandatory, saved on boxes, and over the hill and for internal use. By the way, one of the first MiG-3 models in the territory of the USSR
          walked in such a box.
          1. 0
            April 13 2019 20: 36
            Alexander, I told you what it was — it makes no sense to invent. You asked about every moment, I’m glad to answer, but it was like that in childhood, I didn’t come up with anything for you
            1. 0
              April 14 2019 02: 20
              Quote: Petrograd
              Alexander, I told you what it was — it makes no sense to invent. You asked about every moment, I’m glad to answer, but it was like that in childhood, I didn’t come up with anything for you

              Well, that's good that it was. Sometimes they even brought models to our village. My grandmother bought the same Aurora for me, bought it in Yolochka when I was 10 years old, then in the 8th grade I bought an An-24 from Plastikart in the same place. And also on the line of Posyltorg, having earned money from weeding pine trees, I ordered myself a Mi-6 fire ...
              1. 0
                April 16 2019 00: 43
                Quote: Fitter65
                Well, that was good.

                It’s a pity that it passed quickly ... I’ll go to the dacha, I’ll definitely crawl into the boxes to find this model (though I don’t know in what state it is, when I folded it when moving, I wrapped it in, sorry, in cotton wool, it was much cheaper than even pipifax. first of all, all the small parts-antennas flew off, the chassis-I collected released, the propeller blades, well, the "unforgettable" decals flew off and shrank, everyone who applied them (what is the modern word-nano) remember this phrase from the instructions - keep it warm water and gently apply to the model, honestly not very immediately and it turned out well. And the smell of glue based on acetone, and the eternal search for paint that just didn’t try, everything "rolled" off the plastic, and getting by the "ears" from mom - for stolen nippers, scissors and nail files from her manicure set, propeller blades from combs wink eeeh) and take a picture, I didn’t throw it away - it was very a pity, although my wife cursed (well, women don’t understand beauty, they always put us in a deadlock with their questions, are you, that toys are more expensive than family).
                My grandmother bought me Aurora, we bought it at Yolochka when I was 10 years old, then in the 8th grade I bought an An-24 from Plastikart in the same place. And also on the line of Posyltorg, having earned money from weeding pine trees, I ordered myself a Mi-6 of lights ... You, apparently, joked and twisted, well, your right to pick out raisins from buns.
                1. +2
                  April 16 2019 12: 24
                  Quote: Petrograd
                  You, apparently, have quipped and cursed, well, your right, to pick out raisins from buns.

                  What makes you think? It's just that in our village. Chingissa that in the Novosibirsk region there was a department store called "Yolochka". And in childhood, during the summer holidays, we earned money on weeding 2-3 year old pine trees (or on a Christmas tree as they said) in a tree nursery, the norm for a boy is a bed for 2 days, a bed length of 2,5 km, the price is 3 rubles. And where did you find the banter? The fact that I received money for two weeks of work and bought myself a plastic model? So I also handed over mushrooms to the procurement point, earned myself on "nishtyaki" as today's youth say. Therefore, I subscribed to the magazines "Modelist-Constructor" and "Yunny Tekhnik" myself, as well as some scarce toys through the mail ...
                  1. 0
                    April 16 2019 21: 24
                    Honestly, I thought, a thin banter: "Fir-tree" - "Birch", well, weeding of pine trees, I honestly have not even heard of this, so I apologize.
                    1. 0
                      April 17 2019 00: 31
                      Quote: Petrograd
                      Honestly, I thought, a thin banter: "Fir-tree" - "Birch", well, weeding of pine trees, I honestly have not even heard of this, so I apologize.

                      Come on, it happens.
  24. +8
    April 10 2019 21: 06
    Thank you for the memories from childhood ... In the USSR, models from the GDR were the height of desires, since the allies were much rougher, and they never heard of the Italian ones. And, of course, the Polish magazine "Small Modeler." With its paper models.
    And the GDR MiG-21 had just such a finished look. By the way, it was very easy to remove from the stand.
    1. +4
      April 10 2019 21: 52
      And I remember the GDR model IL-18. Just a holiday!
      1. +5
        April 10 2019 22: 44
        Quote: alsoclean
        And I remember the GDR model IL-18. Just a holiday!

        Compared to the products of the "Krugozor" factory, it is simply "space"!
        1. "Horizon"


        2. "VEB Plasticart"


        But I have remembered for the rest of my life the "masterpiece of minimalism" in aircraft modeling
        - This is "AN-10" (AN-10A) from the same "Krugozor"

        wassat laughing
        1. +2
          April 11 2019 17: 19
          Quote: Freeman
          "VEB Plasticart"

          And the famous glue and "silver" !!!!
          1. +2
            April 11 2019 17: 39
            Quote: Fitter65
            And the famous glue and "silver" !!!!

            One metal tube was worth
          2. 0
            April 12 2019 16: 00
            Quote: Fitter65
            And the famous glue and "silver" !!!!

            Quote: svp67
            One metal tube was worth

            And how the silverfish smelled ... No longer like that. That smell was original (apparently such a smell was in the varnish with which aluminum powder was diluted).
        2. 0
          April 12 2019 13: 31
          From them was the same An-24.
    2. +2
      April 11 2019 17: 38
      Quote: svp67
      And, of course, the Polish magazine "Small Modeler." With its paper models.

      And the domestic magazine "Yunny Technik" with its appendix "Skillful Hands"? Where there were paper sweeps of different models. At one time, I made K-700, and KamAZ-5320, and Ural-375, and KrAZ-255,257,260, and then also the Mi-24A (the first and only helicopter in my modeling life) made of paper thanks to this magazine. After gaining some experience, paper modeling, on the basis of those drawings and technical descriptions of LiAZ, LA3 and IKARUS buses (my sister's husband used to work in Novosibirsk PATP-1), I made these buses on the same scale ... , it was enough for everything ...
      1. 0
        April 12 2019 08: 21
        Oh yes, "Young Technician" and "Tekhnika Molodyozhi" - my favorite magazines were. And according to the nested cutouts, I then glued the MiG-23 out of paper (Or MiG-27, I don’t remember exactly)
  25. +4
    April 10 2019 21: 33
    We look forward to continuing ..
  26. +3
    April 10 2019 22: 01
    glued IS-2 and ISU-152
  27. +4
    April 10 2019 22: 19
    Quote: Alf
    Better not.

    You must Fedya, you must! Have you not read excerpts of the article from TM? Did I write that too? And there is a photo ... And a photo of the boxes ... They were taken from somewhere, right? And if you are lucky with complete boxes, then ... others are not. Everyone writes about what he knows. If you know more, VO will give you the full opportunity to write everything better, more reliable and more accurately. Try it ... And now: How many All-Union toy competitions have you participated in? How many have your developments won prizes? I am in three, and in all my developments took prizes. And who has more experience in this area? But ... again, no one forbids you to write your material about it, on the contrary - personally, I will only be in favor.
    1. Alf
      +2
      April 11 2019 19: 56
      Quote: kalibr
      And the photo of the boxes ... They were taken from somewhere, right?

      If someone blurted out something somewhere, then this is not a reason to pass "this" off as the ultimate truth.
      Dear, have you studied the history of the company FROG at all?
      Quote: kalibr
      And if you are lucky with boxes of full completeness, then ... others are not.

      If you didn’t have them, then this is no reason to write that to the east of the border of the USSR they were not at all on OFFICIAL sale.
      Quote: kalibr
      And now, like this: Have you participated in how many All-Union toy contests? How many of your developments have won prizes?

      I don’t participate in principle, I don’t like it when all sorts of "expert historians" point their fingers at my models.
      Quote: kalibr
      And who has more experience in this area?

      If you made any model smartly, then this does not mean that you are the history of modelism, in particular, the founding father of modelism in the USSR, you know.
      And, which is typical, perhaps, there is not a single article of yours in which you did not throw a shovel of a substance into the country of your birth, and to the place and out of place. "Usual copying", "37th year"
      They are taken from somewhere, right?

      Here is the NOVO box on Buffalo, 10 minutes of work in Shop. He deliberately did not finish painting, so that some, upon seeing her, would not pass off as the original.
      1. Alf
        0
        April 11 2019 20: 06
        Quote: Alf
        Here is the NOVO box on Buffalo, 10 minutes of work in Shop. He deliberately did not finish painting, so that some, upon seeing her, would not pass off as the original.

      2. +1
        April 12 2019 15: 07
        Quote: Alf
        If you made any model smartly, then this does not mean that you are the history of modelism, in particular, the founding father of modelism in the USSR, you know.

        Imagine that everything is exactly as you wrote it. And in the Ministry of Light Industry I visited its assortment department, import department, and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry. I had three toys that were offered for industrial production, so I know a lot, although I don't know how to work in Photoshop. Look at the first issues of Standmaster magazine ... there is a lot about the "founding father" ...
        1. Alf
          +1
          April 12 2019 21: 00
          Quote: kalibr
          Look at the first issues of Standmaster magazine ... there is a lot about the "founding father" ...

          Actually, speaking about the founding father, I meant the FROG company, not you. No matter how you look through SM, there is a scanty thing about FROG; the rest is licking and praising TAMII, which is not surprising, knowing about the financing of the magazine.
          1. +1
            April 13 2019 09: 45
            Well, there was a lot about FROG in the Wings of the Motherland magazine, if I'm not mistaken, because it was a long time ago. I remember that in the same issue there was my article about the uniform of the Luftwaffe pilots, but I could also be wrong. And Tamiya, well ... every sandpiper praises his swamp. However, I have not heard that she funded this magazine.
            1. Alf
              +2
              April 13 2019 13: 09
              Quote: kalibr
              And Tamiya, well ... every sandpiper praises its swamp. However, I have not heard that she funded this magazine.

              And were there any models in SM except TAMI? Yes, and half of the magazine about cars TAMIA says something. Yes, and advertising companies selling TAMIUM, too, which says something. In one of the SM issues, to the reader’s question, why is there so much in the magazine devoted to TAMII models, the editor replied that the TAMIA firm provides financial assistance to the publication. As they say, sapient sat, but a stupid person does not need to know.
      3. 0
        April 12 2019 15: 23
        Quote: Alf
        And, which is typical, perhaps, there is not a single article of yours in which you did not throw a shovel of a substance into the country of your birth, and to the place and out of place. "Usual copying", "37th year"

        And why not throw it, if there is where and for what? By the way, are you from Samara? Have not seen my TV programs from 1985 to 1988 - "School Country Workshop". There was also about the model ...
        1. Alf
          0
          April 12 2019 21: 02
          Quote: kalibr
          And why not throw it, if there is where and for what?

          What copied from FROG? And on the occasion of the 37th, the KGB did not go anywhere, it was only renamed. Aren't you afraid that they will come for you? You have some kind of irrational fear of the Office, maybe there is something for?
  28. +5
    April 10 2019 22: 19
    This is a good article, spoiled by constant "reproaches" to the USSR that it could not provide children with high-quality models. On the other hand, the USSR provided free additional children for such things that today's children can only dream of.
    1. 0
      April 10 2019 22: 36
      Whoever likes it, Viktor Nikolaevich! To pop, to whom, to whom the daughter is pop!
  29. +5
    April 10 2019 22: 37
    Quote: Undecim
    today's children can only dream.

    Today's children cannot dream of that! I know a lot of them. Nobody dreams!
    1. +3
      April 10 2019 22: 46
      How children can dream about what they don’t know. Moreover, you distort a little. We are talking about fundamental possibilities. Filling this opportunity, of course, should correspond to time.
  30. +6
    April 10 2019 23: 16
    I read an article from "youth technology" when I was 12 years old !!! I admired the photo of Soviet tanks on the splash screen and did not even imagine that I would ever read the author again! It's amazing! Good article. Kind, warm. In my childhood I glued Soviet "novo", "light", Kiev and Baku experimental, the first "star" and several imported ones, donated by a cousin who had "risen" in his time. Eh, childhood, childhood ...
  31. +3
    April 11 2019 00: 38
    Useful activity.
    As a child, I was gluing Potemkin and Aurora with a friend, about the same time I was defeating Novikov-Priboy's Tsushima. And these mock-ups of ships greatly added liveliness and realism to the book, I could imagine the scale and general structure, the scale of the described destruction. It's about 10-11 years old.
    And this year I was with my wife in the Naval Museum in St. Petersburg, and, almost 50 years later from those models, I caught myself on the fact that it was the Potemkin and Aurora models that were somehow closer and more familiar to me than rest.
    Well, we visited the "Aurora" itself, there I was already very interested in details that were not reflected or understood on that model, for example, the device of winches for steam boats, a communications cabin ... So these models left some kind of trace for life. , although I have already forgotten about it ...
  32. +1
    April 11 2019 01: 29
    I went through all the steps and I remember everything. Some models are still on the shelf now. Oddly enough, almost all of them are Frog's / new.
  33. +5
    April 11 2019 03: 56
    The first model requested from mom in 96 left a lot of impressions ...

    It was BT-5. And from the tool there are huge old grandmother's scissors, a huge file and a huge tube "Moment". And I'm 12 years old.

    But I did it.

    And since it started ...

    All the models can not be mentioned without mentioning the figures of people. These are hundreds of pieces.

    And then the first money, the first paints ... Now I have a workshop where I don’t even let my wife go. The son sometimes comes in.

    Hobbies 23 years.

    As fishermen discuss catch or prey hunters, large-scale models can be talked about for hours.

    Now I am doing ZiS 5V Zvezdovsky (I just want Zvezdovsky) is the third in a row.

    All modelers of creative success.

    hi
    1. +3
      April 11 2019 07: 40
      Vanek, hi Evaluate the game of fate: the Tu-95 (under the Tu-20 brand) was my very last youth model and stayed longer than anyone else. What was my surprise when I arrived at the duty station and found the full airfield of these aircraft. I still have that model, battered by time and children
      1. +2
        April 12 2019 14: 59
        I, Roman, have a Tu-95 associated with ... a working model-toy hovercraft. On it were the propellers and motors from this model, which rotated in a cunning way. The view was proprietary. She got into the book "For those who love tinkering" ....
        1. +1
          April 13 2019 10: 24
          only our man can make a ship out of an airplane! lol hi
        2. +1
          April 16 2019 03: 13
          Quote: kalibr
          It had propellers and engines


          Probably seen in stores PE-8 from the Star.

          So here. The first PE-8 was given to his son. To tear to pieces. The second PE-8 this year ... Launched.

          smile flying does not fly, but it buzzes and the screws (all four) spin like in the present and in the right direction.

          Four small motors (the benefit of a place in the wing and the gondola allow) from the car radio. And so the little things - the light in the wings.

          hi
      2. 0
        April 16 2019 03: 08
        Unfortunately, BT died a brave death embraced by a mixture of sawdust and baten kerosene.

        Childhood...

        Novel hi
        1. 0
          April 16 2019 07: 24
          34ka was shot from a cannon made of a copper tube loaded with sulfur with matches and small-caliber pellets. plasticine tankers sat inside. not one survived
          1. +1
            April 17 2019 03: 02
            Quote: novel xnumx
            not one survived


            After such shelling, they must be added to the lists of missing persons.
  34. +3
    April 11 2019 07: 16
    Bravo Vyacheslav!
    The topic is very close to me, in the sense that in Soviet childhood I was fond of modeling, I collected a bunch of models. I remember how we stood in line for the opening, in the morning, in the Children's World, in Moscow, to buy the Gdrov model of the aircraft. Read about it is very interesting. We look forward to continue!
    1. +4
      April 11 2019 10: 00
      There will be more than one!
  35. BAI
    +1
    April 11 2019 09: 35
    In addition to plastic models, there was also a direction - wooden, which required independent manual processing of workpieces. I had models of an armored boat and a sea hunter (on a rubber run) and a sailing dinghy.
    1. +3
      April 11 2019 09: 59
      The so-called DOSAAF SEND KITS. I also tried to do it, but ... my hands then grew out of nowhere, and the tree was bad.
      1. -1
        April 16 2019 00: 56
        Quote: kalibr
        The so-called DOSAAF SEND KITS. I also tried to do it, but ... my hands then grew out of nowhere, and the tree was bad.

        From where they grew up, hands grow like that, you just had little experience, Vyacheslav. Look what wonderful articles you write and what hobby you had and have.
    2. +2
      April 11 2019 17: 43
      I still loved small paper in the USSR and paper glued. And even he invented something.
  36. +3
    April 11 2019 12: 10
    I have now taken up gluing again in order to develop hand motor skills, somehow my hands are not what they used to be. an unfinished model of the Su-33 hung on the table, so for a month now my hands have not reached it. There were too many details. Prior to that, he assembled Superjet and Tu-134. And so I had GDR models as a child. These are Boeing-727 in Pan American livery and DC-10 in KLM livery. There were also tanks IS-3, T-34-85, ISU-152. There was Aurora, a cruiser. There were La-5 and Messerschmitt carved from wood, chased along the fishing line, bombed with erasers. There were cast toys-BMD and BTR-60. The soldiers were pewter. Now there are also models, I laid out like here the Napoleonic wars, painted soldiers.
  37. +4
    April 11 2019 13: 05
    Thanks for the article, Vyacheslav Olegovich! I read it, and I sniffed at acetone glue. As a child, it seemed to me that there is no tastier smell (I was not a toxicomaniac). I had many of the models listed in the article (the "Aurora" was especially good). I lived in a small town and when my friends came to my grandmother, she proudly showed them my work, and they really admired, the dark ones. We thought that the models were not glued, but made by me from a single piece of plastic. But I didn't dissuade them. Then, when I moved to another city, I, like you, distributed everything to the neighboring children, but I am already big - 15 years old. Now I remember with light sadness.
    1. +2
      April 11 2019 17: 42
      Quote: AK1972
      I read it, and with my nose I was dressed in acetone glue.

      Tashchemta, usually glued with dichloromethane. = _ = In fact, plastic welding is obtained, because it dissolves polystyrene itself, and is not an adhesive strip between parts.
  38. +4
    April 11 2019 13: 21
    The first box with a model, although a Soyuz spacecraft, was presented to me by my parents in the mid-80s. And, as they say, it rushed)))). Vostok, T-34, ISU-122, IS-3, helicopter Mi-2, TU-104, object number so-and-so (after I realized that it was a "fox" Mig-25). Battleship Potemkin, nuclear icebreaker Lenin, GDR Yak-40, Yak-3 and a bunch of other models I don’t remember. The whole apartment smelled of glue. Many models broke when moving, I gave a lot to my brother, whose all of them broke. But I remember these years with warmth. Yes, knowing my addiction to these matters, the guys gave me a model of some Swedish tank on the DR, I don't remember the name, I saw it for the first time, but I never glued it together, it is lying in the country house. Every summer I tell myself that the weather will be bad and I will stick it together over the weekend. So I say already 5-7 years for sure))))).
    ISU-122 was even with batteries. It was possible to glue, implement there a simple motor, which was attached with the model and turned out to be a model toy. She quickly broke down with me, the guests came by accident when I boasted to her.
  39. +2
    April 11 2019 14: 46
    Per 100500 + article
    The “air pressure receiver” is particularly impressive.

    Impressive plural? But this is correct. Exactly "

    Air receivers crusheds ", because it is designed to perceive two pressures: full and static air flow pressures.
    1. 0
      April 11 2019 19: 06
      Here I am not an expert, not an airplane at all ...
  40. +5
    April 11 2019 17: 53
    "The battleship" Potemkin "and" Cruiser "Aurora" /////
    ------
    I remember! good There were wonderful models. But I had no patience for the tiny guns. But the KV-85 tank itself glued together.
  41. +3
    April 11 2019 18: 02
    I remembered my "demobilization" models, MIG-25PDS and SU-15, there was such a fashion for the memory of service in the "most formidable kind of weapon", the aircraft were made of real duralumin, which was headlong into the aircraft "graveyard". All this demobilized happiness rested on the plexiglass that imitated the runway, and the most important feature was that it was backlit! The stars and the number were painted with tsapon-varnish. And, most importantly, you did all this yourself. Only memory remains, and the MIGs and Sushki themselves are lost in time
  42. +2
    April 11 2019 18: 11
    It would be more correct to name the article "My impressions of modeling in the USSR". She does not pull a historical overview
    1. +1
      April 11 2019 19: 07
      This is your opinion and it, like any subjective opinion, is controversial ...
    2. 0
      April 12 2019 10: 38
      Quote: Type 63
      It would be more correct to name the article "My impressions of modeling in the USSR".

      -------------------------
      Modelism in the USSR was in its infancy compared to current capabilities. Today, children are offered ready-made models and sets for assembly for every taste and budget. If we were happy when children could connect a motor and light bulbs to a finished model, today everything is ready-made is sold in a store and even with a remote control, and even with a video camera. It floats, flies, rides, shoots, lights the way with bulbs and everything on command. He remembered when he went into the army, he gave plastic model airplanes to a disabled classmate. There, the windows were glued into the fuselage transparent. He divided the fuselage in two and put it inside the light bulb, turning the model into a lamp.
      1. Alf
        0
        April 12 2019 21: 08
        Quote: Altona
        Modelism in the USSR was in its infancy compared to current capabilities. Today, children are offered ready-made models and sets for assembly for every taste and budget.

        Right. But then we learned to work with our heads and hands. Something tells me that if you give the modern novice modeler instead of Italy or the Academy a NOVO Corsair or SB, FIG, he will collect them. But the greatest respect in Samara was enjoyed by those who were able to assemble the Samara T-50, in which when developing the thickness of the plastic was taken into account, then not.
    3. -1
      April 16 2019 01: 07
      Quote: Type 63
      It would be more correct to name the article "My impressions of modeling in the USSR". She does not pull a historical overview

      It pulls everyone who was affected by "this hobby"
      -developed fine motor skills of the hands (accuracy, concentration, perseverance)
      - got an incentive for development and creativity
      -interest in the history of aviation and its development (the Internet was not in the library and went alongside many other books about aviation)
      -knowledge of history, not only of aviation, but also of your country, USSR, Russia, Russian Empire, that's how you please.
      - acquisition of initial technical skills
  43. +3
    April 12 2019 07: 16
    The author is well done. Such unanimity is rarely seen. I gladly helped my son in assembling models. I
    make up for what was not in my childhood. And oddly enough, this hobby was useful in small household
    repairs. Thanks to the author.
  44. +1
    April 12 2019 08: 14
    Thank you for the article ... I remembered my childhood) How many times I glued such plastic models of airplanes and helicopters, ships and tanks) Oh there was a time)) And I also read the subscribed magazines "Tekhnika Molodyozhi" and "Young Technician", they often put paper cutouts there models for gluing))) So then I glued MiG-23 and MiG-25 from paper))
  45. +3
    April 12 2019 10: 08
    it was something incredible !!! how flattened me !! the whole gamut of emotions, from swearing, why did I buy this? how can IT be collected ?? - to the admiration and admiration of the Creator, God !! there are many of us! sorry about myself I write this in the past tense ,,, life has changed,
  46. +6
    April 12 2019 13: 23
    "the awful Oglikovsky T-34" is our childhood !!! There is a proposal for VO - to make a photo gallery for users. I am sure that it will replenish well.
    1. +3
      April 12 2019 14: 53
      The photo is great! But with a request, you need to go to the site administration.
      1. Alf
        +1
        April 12 2019 21: 09
        Quote: kalibr
        The photo is great! But with a request, you need to go to the site administration.

        So from the admins there was already a request on this topic. The people voted, we are waiting for the results.
  47. +3
    April 12 2019 13: 42
    As a child, we collected models with my dad and sometimes gave me (mostly an uncle who often went to work in Moscow) GDR models from Plastikart. and the Soviet wretched dad brought to mind at work in the breadboard department of GrozGIPRO Nefty Khim and painted them on magazine photos with nitro-paint. I remember from those painted by my dad we had P-47 Thunderbolt, P-40 Curtiss Kittyhawk and P-38 Lightning, Tempest MK II, P-39 Airacobra (one of my favorites, one grandfather, a father who was familiar from work, flew on it) even such rarities as TBD Devastator with a torpedo and Vampire DH 100 and Soviet ones from plastic ones Mig-15, Mig-19, Mig-21, Sepecat Jaguar, Saab 35 Draken
    1. +3
      April 12 2019 14: 54
      Quote: Klingon
      even such rarities as TBD Devastator with a torpedo and Vampire DH 100 and Soviet ones from plastic Mig-15, Mig-19, Mig-21, Sepecat Jaguar, Saab 35 Draken

      You could be lucky!
      1. +1
        April 12 2019 18: 05
        Thank you, that's for sure, another collection of machine models from both Soviet and Czech ave. and GDR more than 100 pieces. , collected from my birth (1975), exchanged, bought even speculators from speculators, my father repaired them.
    2. Alf
      +2
      April 12 2019 21: 11
      Quote: Klingon
      Tempest mk ii

      Tempest MkV, only Machbox made "two".
      1. +1
        April 12 2019 22: 10
        most likely you are right maybe I don’t remember exactly which version of the tempest was laughing
        1. Alf
          0
          April 12 2019 22: 22
          Quote: Klingon
          most likely you are right maybe I don’t remember exactly which version of the tempest was laughing

          Herr Lieutenant hi
  48. 0
    April 12 2019 14: 56
    Quote: Altona
    He remembered when he went into the army, he gave plastic model airplanes to a disabled classmate.

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!
  49. +1
    April 12 2019 15: 24
    Quote: Alf
    I don’t participate in principle, I don’t like it when all sorts of "expert historians" point their fingers at my models.

    So fear that it is badly done!
    1. Alf
      +1
      April 12 2019 21: 12
      Quote: kalibr
      Quote: Alf
      I don’t participate in principle, I don’t like it when all sorts of "expert historians" point their fingers at my models.

      So fear that it is badly done!

      You know better.
  50. +1
    April 12 2019 15: 40
    Hmm ... The author describes the end of 60x, the beginning of 70x, I was fond of models at the beginning of 80x, but I remember the same models perfectly - small MIG21, SAAB and MI2 green for 60 kopecks, Trident (this was the first model I glued), AN24 , Vostok, Tu144 (I had 3 at different times). The total number of assembled models even find it difficult to count - something broke, something mom threw out like a tired dust collector. The latest collection consisted of the order of 40k aircraft, mainly Gdrovsky. The most valuable were Su7 and Tu2
  51. +3
    April 12 2019 16: 52
    Eh, a piece of childhood. I remember gluing the Yak-18 together. My first model. Gray polystyrene. The GDR sets were of good quality, although not cheap. Assembled Il-62 and Tu-134. The Tu-144 couldn’t handle it - it’s expensive! From tanks I glued together T-34 and ISU-122. The T-34 was electrified (with launcher). I haven’t seen an electrified ISU for sale, but the likelihood that there was one is high - in the body of my non-electrified ISU there were clearly visible traces in the form of places for electric motors, gearboxes, etc.
    1. 0
      April 17 2019 18: 14
      There was an ISU 152 in 1982, assembled for Brezhnev’s funeral on TV, and ran quickly.
  52. +2
    April 12 2019 18: 00
    thank you very much for the article, very interesting, looking forward to the continuation
  53. 0
    April 13 2019 09: 47
    Quote: Alf
    Aren't you afraid that they will come for you?

    No I'm not afraid. I work for the state and its citizens.
  54. 0
    April 15 2019 15: 54
    It turns out that even in an article about models you can, if the author wishes, put the year 37...
    Dear administration, maybe it’s time to publish the names of the authors of articles at the beginning of the article?
    1. 0
      April 16 2019 01: 12
      Quote: kitt409

      It turns out that even in an article about models you can, if the author wishes, put the year 37...
      Dear administration, maybe it’s time to publish the names of the authors of articles at the beginning of the article?

      Maybe commentators will also introduce themselves by last name, so as not to waste time? I saw Ruslan (so-and-so) - Shoot and that’s all I listen to...
      1. -1
        April 16 2019 11: 09
        Are you going to shoot yourself, or will you create structures for this?
        There are too many of you shooters, what's the point?
        By the way, whoever FORCES you to listen to something, pass by and no problems, there’s something wrong with the article - this is for you, well, as for those who are especially literate hi
  55. +1
    April 16 2019 10: 18
    My friends and comrades modelers! After all, we will die and no one will need them at the “stellar” and “draconian” prices of the model. In the Soviet Union, models and technical creativity were available to many times more children. Even the GDR Tu-144 was affordable - it cost 25 loaves of bread, and now modeling is mostly done by respectable and accomplished guys. Remember how beautiful this first, glue-stained and unpainted Ogonkrugozorovskaya model was. The problem is that our children are being torn away from reality: stupid cinema, shapeless toys (in the cheap segment), expensive models, affordable computer games. Fantasy does not develop, there are fewer and fewer left-handed people. When I made the most banal compressor for an airbrush from a refrigerator, I was in a stupor from the admiring glances of those around me - this is not a starship, but a stupid crap... thing from Soviet and Chinese spare parts, assembled on my knee. This is already hysterical, sorry, colleagues.
  56. 0
    April 16 2019 13: 05
    Quote: Oleg Badyulin
    The problem is that our children are being torn away from reality: stupid cinema, shapeless toys (in the cheap segment), expensive models, affordable computer games. Fantasy does not develop, there are fewer and fewer left-handed people.

    And you don’t need a lot of them!
  57. +1
    April 16 2019 13: 05
    Quote: kitt409
    Dear administration, maybe it’s time to publish the names of the authors of articles at the beginning of the article?

    Nobody will do this! It's not even worth writing...
    1. +1
      April 17 2019 11: 42
      It’s a pity, in my opinion, it’s time.
      1. -1
        April 17 2019 18: 12
        And you re-read the comments... There are 194 of them. Of them, “dissatisfied” like yours, just two and out of number. So “in your opinion” 90% of the “people” do not need this.
        1. 0
          April 17 2019 19: 49
          A clear example of your very unique logic, and how many, knowing your style a little better, have not read it, do you also know? bully
          1. 0
            April 18 2019 06: 53
            How many people haven’t read it doesn’t matter. The main thing is how many people read it - more than 17 thousand. Which is very good compared to a number of other materials. So what are you talking about? You should read my textbook on Internet journalism, you would know what, how, to whom, why and why...
            1. 0
              April 18 2019 11: 54
              I definitely won’t read the continuation of your saga, especially since something similar has already been written, although not quite in that aspect, and there won’t be enough time for these opuses, I come here for other purposes...
              But it’s definitely time to put who the author is at the beginning of the article - however, this is not your question at all, so I won’t ask it to you...
  58. 0
    April 18 2019 06: 53
    How many people haven’t read it doesn’t matter. The main thing is how many people read it - more than 17 thousand. Which is very good compared to a number of other materials. So what are you talking about? You should read my textbook on Internet journalism, you would know what, how, to whom, why and why...
    1. 0
      April 18 2019 11: 49
      I definitely won’t read yours, and I won’t even waste time on this, on Internet journalism) - I’d rather finish the monograph, it will be more useful...
  59. 0
    April 19 2019 07: 47
    Quote: kitt409
    I’d better finish the monograph, it will be more useful...

    Are you writing a monograph, Ruslan? My respect to you, and the most sincere. But I’m just burning with curiosity (you don’t see people like that very often at VO) - by order of the publishing house or at random, what is the topic and what is the volume? For a fee or “so”... The fact is that such a thing as a monograph is difficult to write, but even more difficult to publish. Especially today.
    1. 0
      April 19 2019 21: 32
      Exact sciences are something that is quite conservative, to say that it does not change at all - no, so changes have to be made, and there are no special problems with the publication - almost every week there is a letter in the mail from those who somehow managed to find it, and asks at least in electronic form and so on...
      I omit the details, the less specifics they know about you, the better - in my opinion
      1. 0
        April 19 2019 21: 41
        So your topic is not humanitarian? Well, such publications are very valuable. But publishing a paper version is difficult. Especially for the fee. It’s stupid to publish books for your own money...
  60. 0
    April 19 2019 07: 50
    Quote: kitt409
    I definitely won’t read the continuation of your saga, especially since something similar has already been written, although not quite in that aspect, and there won’t be enough time for these opuses, I come here for other purposes...
    But it’s definitely time to put who the author is at the beginning of the article - however, this is not your question at all, so I won’t ask it to you...

    Well, it's up to you, but don't put on the image of Monte Cristo. Your vote is just one click away. I’ll somehow survive his absence...Or are you Academician Aganbegyan?
    1. 0
      April 19 2019 21: 34
      That's exactly what is mine, and there is no need to attribute to me what I did not write.
      What you survive is your business. hi
  61. 0
    26 May 2019 21: 51
    By the way, the molds for the Aurora and Potemkin (Ogonyok) models were made by the French. And they did it great! Back in 1999 they worked.
  62. 0
    17 June 2019 11: 10
    Yes... I remember how I drove my “schoolboy” to the store to buy a model of the AMO F-15 car. He proudly walked out with the box in his hands and rushed home like crazy in anticipation. I remembered about the bike closer to night...
    alas, there was already no trace of him on the steps of the Rassvet department store... we managed to find him a couple of days later, someone, having had enough of a ride, abandoned him by the river on the outskirts of the village.