Murders in Russia and in the Golden Horde: how they looked

66
History Ancient Russia, as well as other medieval lands and states - continuous wars and a series of murders of princes in the struggle for power. The attitude to human life is not too scrupulous and now, in the 21st century, we see what is happening in Syria, in the Donbas, on the African continent, and how frequent are the brutal murders of mercenary or simply hooligan motivations in our country. But in the Middle Ages, murder was seen as a completely natural tool in the struggle for power. People who claimed the princely throne, did not disdain to deal with even the closest relatives - with brothers, and sometimes with their own fathers or sons.

So, the fratricide of princes and princely sons was widespread in Russia. In 1015, Vladimir I died - the prince of Kiev, the son of the famous prince Svyatoslav and the great baptist of Russia, popularly called "Vladimir the Red Sun". His death put an end to the prosperous existence and political unity of Ancient Russia. Vladimir the Red Sun left eleven sons. And, of course, none of them wanted to remain in secondary roles, but dreamed of political leadership in Russia. So the princely sons embarked on the path of a bloody and fratricidal struggle, not stopping in front of the most stringent methods against each other.



Murders in Russia and in the Golden Horde: how they looked


The first victims of the bloodshed were the younger sons of Kievan Prince Vladimir the Red Sun Boris and Gleb. Shortly before his death, Vladimir sent Boris and his retinue to repel the Pecheneg raid, but the nomads were not discovered by the prince and he turned back. On the way, he learned about the death of his father and that the throne was occupied by the half-brother Svyatopolk. Boris's combatants offered to take Kiev by storm and seize the throne, but Boris, a decent and religious man, refused this idea and then his army left.

Svyatopolk, in turn, sent proxies from among the Vyshegorodsky boyars with the assignment to remove Boris, who was sympathized with by many warriors and ordinary people. A group of boyars, led by a certain Putshi, arrived on the night of July 24 to Boris’s tent, which was defeated by the Alta River. Waiting until Boris went to bed, the killers broke into the tent and pierced Boris and his servant Hungarian Georgy with spears. Then Boris, seriously wounded, was wrapped in a tent-cloth and brought to Svyatopolk, who ordered the two Varyags to finish off their brother. Boris was struck with a sword in his heart, after which he was secretly buried in Vyshgorod.

The next was Gleb. Full brother Boris, he represented a threat to Svyatopolk as a potential avenger. Therefore, Svyatopolk called Gleb to Kiev. At this time, Gleb heard from Prince Yaroslav that Svyatopolk was going to kill him. But it was too late. The killers headed by Goryazer sent by Svyatopolk appeared to Hleb. The latter ordered Gleb to be slaughtered by his cook, Tork. This happened September 5 1015. Gleb's body was buried "out of nowhere," in the Smolensk region. Only in 1019, after the capture of Kiev by Yaroslav, was Gleb's body excavated and brought to Vyshgorod, where, together with Boris's body, they buried with honors at the church of St. Basil.

The killing of Boris and Gleb was one of the first and most famous political assassinations in Russia after her baptism. And, of course, the Russian chroniclers could not fail to capture this murder in miniature. It is thanks to the Russian chronicles with illustrations that we know the details of this and many other murders in Ancient Russia.

In 1568 — 1576, on the personal request of Ivan the Terrible, the Facial Chronicle was compiled - a colorful multi-volume chronicle. It consisted of 10 volumes containing 10 thousands of rag pages and 16 thousands of thumbnails. The set was made in a single copy and covered the entire history "from the creation of the world" to the modern Ivan the Terrible. The first three volumes covered the sacred biblical, ancient Greek history, the history of the Ancient East and Ancient Rome. Therefore, the remaining seven volumes are of interest to us in the context of the article, which are devoted to Russian history from 1114 to 1553.

Many miniatures of the Facial Chronicle are devoted to scenes of the murder of Russian princes. Frequently depictions of how Russian princes are killed by enemies - the Mongols, Litvin. Here is an image of Vasilko Konstantinovich’s murder. The unit prince of Rostov, 29-year-old Vasilko, killed 4 in March 1238 of the year in Mongol captivity after the defeat of Russian troops on the River City. Vasilko was seized by the Mongols, who demanded that he take the oath to the Khan. Vasilko refused and after torture and humiliation was killed. The Russian Orthodox Church has long been Vasilko canonized.

Prince of Tver Mikhail Yaroslavich was brutally murdered as well, then also ranked as a saint. It happened in 1318 year. Mikhail of Tver was competing for power with the Prince of Moscow, Yuri Danilovich. Both princes rushed to the Golden Horde - for support from the Khan. But Mikhail stayed on the way and arrived at the Horde, to the Uzbek khan, later his rival. At this time, Uzbek was already opposed to Mikhail of Tver by his opponent, Yuri Danilovich. By decision of the Khan's court, the prince concluded in the deck. Month was Michael in captivity, until his murder happened.

In the tent to the people of Michael of Tver broke the people of Yuri Danilovich. There they saw a man kneeling and praying. The assassins grabbed Michael by the wooden deck on his neck and hit the prince. Mikhail managed to jump up from his knees, but those who broke in began to beat him and kick him. A certain Ivanets grabbed the prince by the ears and beat him with his head on the ground, and then a certain Romanets, armed with a large knife, hit Michael in the ribs, in the right side and thrust the knife into the prince's side several times. Thus ended one of the most famous Russian princes at that time, who could well claim leadership in the then “Russian world”.



Only a year later, the coffin with the body of Mikhail of Tver was brought to Tver - this was preceded by an agreement between Yuri Danilovich and Mikhail's son Alexander of Tver. Prince was buried in the Transfiguration Cathedral on the banks of the Volga. The church honors Michael of Tver as a holy martyr who has accepted a terrible death.

Seven years after the murder of Mikhail of Tver, in 1325, the same fate befell the “customer” of the crime, Moscow Prince Yuri Danilovich. It all started with the fact that in 1321, Dmitry Tverskaya recognized the label of Yuri Danilovich and handed him the Horde tribute. But Yuri, who was not distinguished by financial cleanliness, as they would say today, brought tribute to Novgorod and there simply sold off. These actions infuriated the Horde Khan Uzbek and he gave the label to the reign of Dmitry of Tver. Yuri went to the Novgorod land, escaping Dmitry Tversky, who was pursuing him.



Three years passed and Yury Danilovich, having gathered courage or impudence, went to the capital of the Horde Saray-Berke for an audience with Khan Uzbek, hoping to receive a label for a great reign. However, there he was met by the Grand Duke Dmitry Mikhailovich the Terrible Ochi. He immediately burned with anger and in a fit hempered Yury Danilovich.

Angry Horde grabbed Dmitry the Terrible Eyes and placed him in custody. A year later, Khan ordered the execution of Dmitry the Terrible Eyes, and the label for the great reign was transferred to his brother Alexander Mikhailovich Tversky. Alexander became the prince of Novgorod.



The following fourteen years passed, as they say, with varying success. The prince then fell into disfavor with Khan Uzbek, then returned his confidence. In 1339, Ivan Kalita of Moscow arrived in the Horde, who managed to blacken Prince Alexander Mikhailovich in front of Khan Uzbek. And when Alexander Mikhailovich himself arrived in the Horde, he and his son Fyodor were brutally killed - their heads were cut off, and then the bodies were cut to pieces.

Do not forget, by the way, the Russian chroniclers to paint and murders committed in the Golden Horde by the Horde themselves. After all, the Horde not only did not yield to Russian princes in cruelty, but also surpassed them. And for the Khan's throne no less battles unfolded than for the power in the ancient Russian principalities.

For example, one of the miniatures depicts the killing of his wife Khansha Tovlunbek by Khan Tokhtamysh. This happened in 1386 year. Interestingly, the miniature and the killed khansha, and her killer, Khan Tokhtamysh, are depicted in clothes that are not distinguishable from the old Russian costumes of the nobility, although it is clear that the Mongolian khans had a completely different style of dressing. But did the chroniclers know this? Or did they simply follow the uniform tradition adopted in the miniature of that time?



By the way, the characters of the other miniatures, depicting the killing of Khan Berdibek in 1359, are dressed in the same clothes. Mohammed Berdibek Khan, the son and successor of Khan Janibek, was the eighth ruler of the Golden Horde and ruled the former Juchi ulus in 1357-1359. Janibek sent Berdibek on a campaign to Persia, where the Khan's son remained to rule in Tabriz, but having received news of his father's illness, he hurried to return to the Golden Horde, so as not to miss the Khan's throne.

In the Horde, Berdibek ordered the destruction of all members of the Batu Khan clan in order to protect themselves from potential competitors in the struggle for the throne. Twelve people were killed, and the Khan personally dealt with his eight-month-old brother, throwing his head on the ground. But cruelty did not bring Berdibek long power and deliverance from rivals.



Two years after the accession of Berdibek at the head of the Golden Horde, a coup occurred in the khan's headquarters. In the autumn of 1359, Berdibek was killed by his rivals, and a new khan, Kulp, was established on the Khan's throne. He declared himself the son of Janibek, who allegedly had the right to the khan's throne. But Kulp also stayed at the head of the Golden Horde for only six months - they soon overthrew him and, along with his two sons, killed him. And this episode also captured the Facial Chronicle.

The next kill in the power struggle in the Golden Horde was not long in coming. Five months later, after the murderer of Kulpa Nauruz-Khan Mohammed reigned on the throne of the Golden Horde, the same fate awaited him. Nauruz Khan was murdered by order of Khizr, the first representative of the Ord-Yezhen clan, the eldest son of Jochi. But Khizr was also killed three months later by his own son Timur-Khoja.

It is possible to list the Horde khans, which change every six months or a year, for a very long time. Almost all of them came to power as a result of coups, accompanied by the murders of their predecessors, and just as well after a very short time, they even cracked down on themselves. Therefore, these “short-term” Khans, unlike such “Titans” as Batu-Khan or Uzbek, practically did not leave any memory of themselves. And today we can read about them, including, thanks to the Facial Chronicle, which showed the struggle for power in the Golden Horde as a continuous series of political assassinations.

Thus, we see that the medieval history of both Russia and the Golden Horde are continuous murders as a result of the struggle for power. Actually, the murder of princes and khans then could be studied and Russian, and the Horde story. The facial chronicle collection depicted scenes in a very colorful and accurate manner of reprisals against princes and hanes, although it is difficult for modern man to perceive such miniatures. But the value of the chronicle in miniatures is undoubted: it allows us to take a more objective look at the history of that time, to see it “in colors”.
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    29 March 2019 05: 15
    Thus, we see that the medieval history of both Russia and the Golden Horde are sheer murders as a result of the struggle for power.

    Who was different in those days? Very curious, really.
    Something is not very clear the message of the article. More precisely, the conclusion (and I quote from it the main idea) is alarming. = _ =
    1. +4
      29 March 2019 05: 25
      Quote: Kuroneko

      Who was different in those days? Very curious, really.
      Something is not very clear the message of the article. = _ =

      Hmm-ah-ah ... The gloomy Middle Ages ...
      But even despite the internecine strife of Russia, and then , our "gloom" was strikingly different from what happened in the same period in the West.
      Well, we, as it were, in the middle, between the Horde and Europe, East and West. So it was, and so it is.
      1. +2
        29 March 2019 06: 51
        Why do they try not to notice that * the dark medieval * ALWAYS came after the adoption of Christianity.
        Vladimir, who was consecrated, was eager for power by any means, including through the killings and betrayal of those closest to him. But today, an oath-criminal and a murderer of a saint.
        Already, Nicholas No. 2 is being dragged from * the martyrs * to * saints *.
        As I understand it, saints among Christians are the lights that are role models for life and aspirations. Or not?
        Today * a foreign church * is already a part of the Russian Orthodox Church, omitting that in the USA all religious figures are obliged to receive * blessing * from special services. The actions of churchmen in Ukraine clearly and fully demonstrated this.
        1. +15
          29 March 2019 07: 30
          Quote: Vasily50
          Why do they try not to notice that * the dark medieval * ALWAYS came after the adoption of Christianity.

          Oh, in the pre-Christian era, of course, there was peace, light and peace. Tell about it to Askold with Dir, Rogvolod Polotsky with his daughter, Yaropolk, whom she wanted to marry ... Yes, even Prince Igor, at the moment when they tied him to the trees.
          Do not make people laugh.
          1. +2
            29 March 2019 14: 54
            oh these historians ... maybe it should be simpler --- the territory of Russia is a complete analogue of the Caribbean Sea, the pirate-gangster territory ... and all the great and small princes are dukes, counts are lucky robbers, raised brothers. Rifle-- Gives Power (Mao Zedong)
            1. +2
              29 March 2019 21: 57
              Oh, these are not historians ... Everything would be possible for them to primitivize to the utmost, so that they themselves become understandable. But nobody wants to study.
              1. 0
                30 March 2019 20: 43
                semi-education and anonymity of the Internet, and now you can write any nonsense about successful robbers and brothers
          2. -1
            29 March 2019 15: 15
            trilobite
            Rogvold of Polotsk was killed by Vladimir, subsequently * clearly the sun *. Rogvold in fulfillment of kinship obligations received Vladimir and his gang in detinets. Among the Scandinavians there have always been many craftsmen to poison, and after the poisoning of the prince and his neighbors, Polotsk was captured. Rogvold's daughter was raped and either killed or surrendered to the bandits. By the way, the bandit from the word * bond * -Norse detachment. The poison was common to the Scandinavians, they poisoned each other at feasts and smeared their weapons with poisons. Some of the Scandinavians were seared with mushrooms, and when they lost their sense of fear and pain they were sent to enemies.
            The Danes hired Vladimir to lead their bandits to Polotsk, which Vladimir performed. The gang included representatives of Novgorod, which was the founder of the Hanseatic League, and its warriors were the main striking force of the union.
            About poisoning is more than serious. Well, the Danish and other bandits could not cope with the Polotsk squad except through poison. In battles and Danes and other bandits were ALWAYS beaten by the Polotsk squad.
            1. +3
              29 March 2019 18: 08
              . By the way, the bandit from the word * bond * -Norse detachment.

              Dear Vasily, the history of the word “gang” in the Russian language has been studied in pre-revolutionary Russia. In Germanic languages, it appeared during the 30-year war and is directly related to Landsknechts! "Bond", "Bond" - a group of armed wars, goes back to the ancient Gothic language, so the link to the "Scandinavian troops" is very, very far-fetched!
            2. -1
              29 March 2019 18: 42
              In medieval England, long before the 30-year war, back in the days of Danish robberies, only Danish bandits were called * bonds *.
              French, Burgundian and other * adventurers * were called by the names of the leaders or by the place where they came from.
            3. +4
              29 March 2019 22: 06
              the fiftieth.

              Quote: Vasily50
              after the poisoning of the prince and his neighbors and Polotsk was captured

              Quote: Vasily50
              thug from the word * bond *

              Quote: Vasily50
              Some warriors Scandinavians singed broth mushroom

              Quote: Vasily50
              Danes hired Vladimir

              Quote: Vasily50
              Novgorod who was the founder of the Hanseatic League,

              Where do you get this nonsense? Name the source, just interesting. It seems that even Fomenko - the main freak from history, I have not met such nonsense, although I will not say that I thoroughly know his "work". Who is this - some Panasenkov or Pyzhikov? Zadoronov or Bushkov?
              Quote: Vasily50
              In the battles and the Danes and other bandits were ALWAYS bits Polotsk squad.

              Bother to give a list of such battles - when, who, with whom, why ... What is this unsubstantiated nonsense?
              Although, laugh, of course, notably, thank you.
    2. 0
      29 March 2019 09: 41
      Quote: Kuroneko
      Who was different in those days? Very curious, really.
      Something is not very clear the message of the article. More precisely, the conclusion (and I quote from it the main idea) is alarming.

      Not alarming, but puzzling: the author directly accuses Russia:
      the medieval history of Russia and the Golden Horde - total killings


      You may notice that the medieval history of Russia is a story of no deaths, and birth-the best country in the world- Russia.

      The killings in the struggle for power were ALWAYS, from the primitive cave to this day and EVERYWHERE and Russia, far from being the leader in this ....
      1. -1
        31 March 2019 02: 11
        Terry nationalism to consider our country "the best" (everyone remembers what this led Hitler to), laughing at the Ukrainians, and on the same rake with our foreheads? For me, China is no worse - an ancient country that gave the world calligraphy, silk, many other inventions (google), any country with a rich history has something to be proud of, and India - they had Ramayana when in Russia it was not that there was no written language, but there was no such concept at all - in the dense forests, in some places there were villages, in each of them they worshiped - where the pillar, where the bear (future Yaroslavl) or Egypt with the pyramids, and Greece, where in the temples 2000 years ago, pressing the floor with your foot automatically opened the door (the forerunner of our supermarkets) by the way about the Greeks - the Spartans even before our era fought in armor, about which in the areas where Moscow was not even heard of - the forests were deserted, so there is no need to consider ourselves better than the Greeks (it is proven that they are genetically progenitors of Europeans ) or the wise, calm in their Taoism, obedient to the emperor with his jade warriors, the Chinese (by the way, in the imperial palace of China, the oldest toilet in the world will be found, which is about 2000 years old, in our Half of the villages of Russia still have a toilet on the street, so shove this pride away - we are all people living on the same planet Earth.)
  2. +1
    29 March 2019 05: 55
    There are many beardless people. even in the time of Ivan the Terrible.
    but in the 16th century we still didn’t know how to draw recourse
    1. -1
      29 March 2019 06: 39
      Under the Romanovs, not only the state archive was destroyed, but also books and manuscripts that were kept in families. If they found, then everyone who knew how to read was killed and sold the rest to monasteries. Then * Parsuns * and * murals * that were kept in families were destroyed - Parsuns are portraits, mural paintings with a plot.
      The destruction of the memory of Rus was universal, under the supervision of the church. Belonging to the nobility did not save from destruction, it was then that many noble families were suppressed.
      1. +5
        29 March 2019 07: 56
        Here are just pictures when Rurikovich painted
      2. +2
        29 March 2019 17: 59
        Vasily, if everything was so gloomy, how do you know about this? Something Rybakov and Shakhmatov do not have about it
        1. 0
          29 March 2019 21: 40
          So damn it, historians are lying! laughing
  3. +14
    29 March 2019 06: 24
    With all due respect to the author, he completely did not study the topic and did not disclose it.
    He himself was going to write an article about the murders among Rurikovichi as a way of dealing with political opponents, however, I wanted to confine myself to the pre-Mongol period, because then everything becomes monotonous - a call to the Khan and execution.
    Although here the author should have mentioned, for example, the massacre of the Ryazan princes by the Ryazan princes at the feast, the murder of Mikhail of Chernigov in 1245, and simply the first murder of the princes in Russia - Askold and Dir Oleg, the first murder of Prince-Rurik-Yaropolk Svyatoslavich ...
    In short, the author of the topic does not know, did not study, did not systematize, simply stated the most famous facts lying on the surface and made a really stunning conclusion in its originality and novelty:
    the history of Russia and the Golden Horde are solid killings as a result of the struggle for power

    Three "ha ha" four times. Baby talk. Was it worth it to waste your and our time?
    There was a higher opinion about the author’s research abilities. sad
    1. +3
      29 March 2019 12: 41
      Quote: Trilobite Master
      He himself was going to write an article about murders among the Rurikovich

      I hope that you will not give up your intention. Write, Michael. Your articles are always interesting and easy to read, and the topic is interesting.
      1. 0
        29 March 2019 13: 49
        Quote: AK1972
        I hope that you will not give up your intention.

        Thank you.
        Regarding the article - I do not like to write on topics already processed by other authors, in my understanding, this is not entirely correct. Although in this case, I consider that the author obviously faked, so I don’t feel any moral obligations towards him. I will try. hi
        1. +3
          29 March 2019 18: 07
          Michael (I don’t know the fatherland) if you really write on this topic, I will readily read it to compare
        2. +1
          29 March 2019 19: 31
          Quote: Trilobite Master

          Thank you.
          Regarding the article - I do not like to write on topics already processed by other authors, in my understanding, this is not entirely correct. Although in this case, I consider that the author obviously faked, so I don’t feel any moral obligations towards him. I will try. hi

          Michael from your promise, I already choked on my saliva and knocked over a couple of wings in Pan's cellars! High-quality analysis from your keyboard and from your hands is worth a lot !!!
          Mmmmm, and if you swing yourselves at the violent youths, who, in Novomgorod, magicians chicked their heads with hatchets. Or the humane way to remove a political adversary through "blinding" like Vasilka Tribivalsky ......
          We wait and hope!
          To be honest, a generalization of the Russian and Mongolian experience of murder by the respected Author of the article, alas, is very far-fetched. Moreover, Ilya with his conclusions does not pour water on our mill, but sadly continued the negative experience of a number of post-war German historians who, through such theses, tried to belittle the significance of our victory in the Great Patriotic War!
    2. +1
      29 March 2019 21: 52
      Well, yes, it happens, sometimes it brings Polonsky into topics about which he does little "rosumite". A vivid example: an article about special forces half a year ago. Moreover, it would be interesting to read materials from a person who understands the topic.
  4. +2
    29 March 2019 07: 00
    Quote: Trilobite Master
    True, I wanted to limit myself to the pre-Mongol period, since everything further becomes monotonous - a challenge to the khan and execution.

    I wonder what sources you rely on?
    1. +5
      29 March 2019 07: 14
      The names of the Greeks, Fishermen, Tolochko, Gorsky are familiar to you? smile Yes, in addition, there are also records, they could be read. Yes, even Wikipedia is not one article, but several related, check sources, there are indicated ... The author did not do this, unfortunately.
  5. +3
    29 March 2019 07: 24
    The author did not say anything criminal, he simply called things by their proper names ..., there was a struggle for power and any methods there are permissible ..., moreover, in modern terms, all these princes are the heads of organized crime groups ..., ordinary clan and mafia disassemblies ... consecrated by the church in Europe, in Russia,
  6. +3
    29 March 2019 07: 43
    what is the ARTICLE for? .. in a negative way posed .. The struggle for power is never beautiful .. everyone has skeletons in the closet .. the only question is .. Does the ruler care for the FATHERLAND or FOR HIS OWN! that's all !
    1. +1
      29 March 2019 19: 34
      Quote: Nitarius
      what is the ARTICLE for? .. in a negative way posed .. The struggle for power is never beautiful .. everyone has skeletons in the closet .. the only question is .. Does the ruler care for the FATHERLAND or FOR HIS OWN! that's all !

      The winners write the story, if it’s rude - the side that has kept its butt !! crying
  7. +13
    29 March 2019 08: 08
    Beyond reality is how the Russian princes, disdaining corporate honor and human dignity, substituted each other in the Horde. The struggle for power, expressed in the cherished label of reign, was often more important than national interests. This cross did not bypass the "saint" A. Nevsky.
    In this regard, the exceptional feat of Mikhail Tversky, framed by Muscovites - informers. The present was a prince, and it is a pity that he did not lead the process of unification of Russia.
    1. +7
      29 March 2019 08: 43
      Quote: Albatroz
      In this regard, the exceptional feat of Michael of Tver,

      And what is the feat? That went to Russia twice with the Tatars? The fact that Kavgadyya after Borteneva cajole? In the fact that twice Khan label received? Tribute drove to the Horde? I do not know, for me, so ordinary, nothing particularly remarkable ruler. For Tver, he did a lot, for Russia - almost nothing.
      1. +13
        29 March 2019 08: 52
        And what is the feat?

        In that he did not lose human dignity, unlike his slanderers.
        Did he go to Russia twice with the Tatars?

        No, in that he once defeated the Tatars, who, in alliance with the Muscovites, burned the Russian land, and in general resisted the Moscow "gathering" - greedy and not disdaining about anything or anyone. For which, in principle, he paid.
        unremarkable ruler

        then his opponent and slanderer Yuri
        1. +5
          29 March 2019 14: 27
          Quote: Albatroz
          did not lose human dignity, unlike his slanderers

          This refers to Yuri Moskovsky, I understand? And what is he who has lost his dignity? Unlike Michael, the faithful and humble servant of the Khan, Yuri, just once, constantly obeyed him, as a result of which his land was twice subjected to a joint march of Michael and the Tatars and, accordingly, to ruin.
          Quote: Albatroz
          once defeated the Tatars, who in alliance with the Muscovites burned the Russian land

          What kind of Tatars? The retinue of Ambassador Kavgadiya? So Kavgadiy did not participate in the battle at Bortenev, and after the battle he visited Mikhail in Tver, where Mikhail himself received him, treated him and flirted in every possible way. There was no battle between the Testerichs and the Tatars near Bortenev. Those were standing on the sidelines - why was this for them?
          Quote: Albatroz
          then his opponent and slanderer Yuri

          It is more noticeable.
          Heading a tiny principality with a small town in the center, far from all major trade routes, lost in deep forests, on a small river, thanks to its energy, it managed to keep the acquired Pereyaslavl, and before that, Kolomna, capture and keep Mozhaisk, Nizhny Novgorod ( Moscow then lost it, however, to resist a powerful Tver geographically located much more profitable, besides using the resources of the Vladimir principality ... At the same time, he managed not only to withstand, but also to defeat a much more powerful opponent. Yes, he did not choose the means, but who then chose them and, in general, Mikhail? When did the Torzhok burn with the Tatras? Or when with them Moscow besieged? And in general, the question whether such intelligibility is the dignity of a politician for me personally can be only one answer - no.
          You, apparently Balashov have been reading. Oh, he Yuri pripechatan so pripechatal. But he is a writer, that is, a dreamer. I myself am very good at his work, but nevertheless he is not a scientist, but a novelist and he wrote novels, not historical works. His designs must be treated critically.
          Objectively, Yuri was a stronger and more independent politician with respect to the Horde than Mikhail, who, having much stronger starting positions in the fight against Yuri, managed to lose everything, including power and life.
          1. +2
            30 March 2019 08: 04
            The Balashov cycle made a strong impression at the time.
            But, probably, as elsewhere, it makes sense to distinguish between man and sovereign.

            And what books could you recommend on the confrontation between Moscow and Tver?
            1. +1
              30 March 2019 10: 21
              At one time I read Erkehard Klug's excellent monograph "The Principality of Tverskoy" - a fairly objective and not biased study. I can recommend Gorsky "Russia and the Horde". Everything is on the net.
              1. +2
                30 March 2019 11: 56
                Thank. I will remember.
    2. +6
      29 March 2019 10: 34
      Quote: Albatroz
      The struggle for power, expressed in the coveted label of reign, was often more important national interests.

      And can you elaborate on national interests, and indeed on nations in the Middle Ages?
      1. +4
        29 March 2019 20: 11
        From the release of this site "Pskov we"! hi
        From my sad experience .... for twenty years, three times went under the Moscow generals! But life for sins decided to finish me off completely and for six months now I’ve been sitting in the same room with the “capital Varangian” who came for the “big stars”! So from his bell tower we are all “natives” - scum who sleep and see so that the “big stars” would not fall on his handsome and smart shoulders!
        From practice! The worst thing is when close relatives share the inheritance. Only the sharing of children by former spouses is more terrible !!! From the protocol of the inspection of the scene "73 stab wounds in the abdomen ....." without comment ......
        Conclusions: national, private or other interests are primarily interests and tying them to sociocultural and political-economic processes is a trite ungrateful result. Any public institution is transformed according to the ideology of leaders. But initially formed by the aspirations of people, family ties, property interests, economic and other processes. So yesterday, today, tomorrow we will position our “skin” according to a simple pyramid of the significance of its “skin” interests: family, home, city, region, nation, country ..... however, as well as a person’s ability to cross his moral standards into the goals of their "skin" values!
        To summarize! In a tribal society, the native speaker of your language is a person, in the opposite case - an "enemy", in some even "food"! Further, with the development of society, the field of interests of the individual steadily expanded, and communications became more complicated. But the inner aspirations of the individual caveman and today's nerd are generally the same - to devour, - to sleep and continue on the list ...... Only an idea could help people to step over their nature, but alas, not everything depends on its carrier!
        1. +1
          29 March 2019 22: 05
          Eh, Vlad! For me, at one time, it was somehow easier with the "Tambov" ...
          1. +3
            30 March 2019 06: 16
            Seriously, Anton, I heard the basics of this idea in the 95th from the “Uralmashevsky gopniks” when I was returning from town in uniform at night! I am alone, and there are fifteen of them. They began to pester two girls, then I still “ideological go @ t” intervened. I then thought that everything was “kitten’s kerdyk”, but I couldn’t and couldn’t! The leader of the Gopniks, was smarter than me, he did not hang the "wet cop" and saved his flock, without destroying his authority. Literally, I don’t remember his monologue, but his logic was simple - “The menthenish is studying in the“ tower ”(EWS MAD of Russia), the“ tower ”is on the“ Elmash ”,“ Elmash ”and“ Uralmash ”are brothers forever, which means an unreasonable“ menthen ” "Ours, but their own do not offend! After me, all members of the pack shook hands and left! Before the HSE checkpoint, those same girls who, by the way, were 5 years older than me, escorted me.
            This with age, I realized that I was incredibly lucky ....
            But the essence is simple, the awareness of the interests of the state by the masses comes in difficult times, and alas, not everyone. For the rest of the time, we simply tighten the system of sociocultural and national ties within the framework of our interests!
            Profitable - we are Moscow, not profitable - we walked by! And when it becomes possible to rake both of them, then the brothers are Slavs !!!
            Regards, Vlad!
    3. +1
      30 March 2019 21: 53
      what interests? the feudal lord does not and cannot have national interests. He doesn’t even know such words. Nations take shape later, with the formation of bourgeois relations. And here is the usual feudal fuss with chopping off a village by a neighbor. Fuss is usually anemic. 2-3 hundreds of pros will converge, they’re not kicking each other much and will disperse. Prisoners will be redeemed, the vanquished will be taken to their service. The population, if it did not come across this gang, might not have noticed such a war. And why do they need to genocide totally peasants - now they are yours, the winner, the economic base.
      Running around the Tatars is a harsh reality. Fighting with them at that time was useless. They could bring such contingents that oh. And the total war they preached with the multiplication of the disobedient by zero repelled any desire to tempt fate.
      The princes were equal to each other. All Rurikovich, everyone can claim the championship. Personnel issues were resolved in the Horde. So the princes tried to the best of their ability and ability to resolve issues.
  8. +8
    29 March 2019 08: 30
    The article is not about anything, the listing of well-known facts
  9. BAI
    +2
    29 March 2019 09: 04
    They saw there a man kneeling and praying. The killers grabbed Mikhail by the wooden deck located on his neck and hit the prince. Michael managed to jump from his knees, but the men who broke in began to beat him and kick him. A certain Ivanets grabbed the prince by the ears and hit him with his head on the ground, and then a certain Romanian, armed with a large knife, hit Mikhail in the ribs, on his right side and planted a knife on the prince’s side several times.

    The church honors Michael of Tver as a holy martyr who received a terrible death.

    Unnecessary confirmation of the duplicity of the Russian Orthodox Church. So the prince is a saint, although he has not done anything special (all the merits that he is a prince (like Nicholas is the king)). But Yevgeny Rodionov, who took death for faith, is not, because of ordinary people.
    1. +1
      30 March 2019 06: 18
      St. Michael because he took the execution for his own people, and did not run, substituting his lands for defeat.
  10. +2
    29 March 2019 09: 07
    Fatherland, joy, then there were a great many motherlands, which should be considered the main thing? Robbery is the basis of the economy of these countries ... complete chaos, people hid from forests through these statesmen, Tatars fought against this chaos as much as they could ..., people were baptized, churches were built, princes would lead and sell in their greed, they would sell the whole population, only the Tatars prevented ...,
  11. -5
    29 March 2019 14: 25
    In America = in the USA, over the past 150 years, 100 = one hundred million Indians = indigenous people have been physically destroyed. The Anglo-Saxons have rich historical experience in cleansing entire continents from the indigenous population (for example, the same thing happened in Australia). It is high time for the United Nations to acknowledge these heinous crimes = GENOCIDE, and in the United States to repent for it and begin to pay life compensation to all the few surviving descendants of the Indians as compensation. National Anglo-Saxon religion = BAPTISM = it is the religion and life position of the MEDIEVAL PIRATES = to deceive, attack the weak, rob, capture in slavery or kill. Uncle SAM = SHMUL the whole WORLD drags his raking paws into his insatiable mouth VAAL
    Hitler is a puppy compared to the "conquerors of America": as a result of the Holocaust of the American Indians, also known as the "Five Hundred Years War", 95 of the 114 million native inhabitants of the present territories of the USA and Canada were destroyed.
    And if you make adjustments for unborn children because of the killed Indian parents, the loss of the Indians will become even worse.
    1. +5
      29 March 2019 14: 36
      Quote: colotun
      In America = in the USA for the last 150 years

      Free at least this section from stupid and primitive agitations. Few places in others?
      Quote: colotun
      to amend for unborn children because of killed Indian parents,

      laughing wassat good
      And most importantly, with each generation the number of "unborn children" will grow, and hence the atrocities of the Anglo-Saxons too ... Cool. Cain, it turns out, so in general in one fell swoop more than seven billion people filled up - all the failed descendants of Abel. The most massive killer. wassat
      1. +1
        29 March 2019 22: 07
        I said invasion. And you did not believe ...
    2. +2
      29 March 2019 15: 01
      In America = in the USA, over the past 150 years, 100 = one hundred million Indians = indigenous people have been physically destroyed.

      100 000 001 .... You forgot one Indian ... Yes
      1. +1
        29 March 2019 20: 19
        And just do it, I propose that all of humanity be put to death for the fact that their ancestors “ate all the mammoths” !!!!!
        1. +1
          29 March 2019 22: 20
          This is strong! Mathematicians have long resolved the problem of overpopulation of the planet, shoot everyone through one ... The Ministry of Internal Affairs is more specific!
          Vlad, will there be exceptions?
          I didn’t eat mammoths, only reindeer, can I live to see a human hospital on the Moon (God bless him, on Mars, I don’t dream ....)
          1. +2
            30 March 2019 05: 49
            Anton, but for your great-great-great ....... are you sure grandfather ......? Stand, sit, tell the truth ... wassat
            1. +2
              30 March 2019 08: 55
              You’re not sewing me, boss! laughing
          2. +3
            30 March 2019 08: 07
            We'll have to transfer the card to the second box. For you in the second call will take.

            It’s so dangerous to start making excuses.
  12. 0
    30 March 2019 07: 16
    The author! And what did you actually want to say with your article ??? Trite, flat, slurred. For Power they always killed, they kill and will kill ..., Russia, the Horde, Beijing, Palermo .....
  13. +1
    30 March 2019 08: 23
    "The assassins sent by Svyatopolk, led by Goryaser, appeared to Gleb."
    what is the murderer’s spoken name - goryaser (in Old Russian it may make good sense, but by the present - grief sir) thanks to the author for the article.
  14. -1
    30 March 2019 13: 54
    Explain such a word as Litvin ??? ))) There were Lithuanians, so in an extreme way in Russian chronicles)) The author is either a slave or potatoes from the homeland))) No need to fantasize)))
    1. 0
      30 March 2019 14: 27
      The Litvinians are descendants of the Baltic tribes, which are very controversially ranked among the Slavs (Slavs, Slovens are one of many tribes of presumably Finno-Ugric origin), historically lived from Mordovia to the Baltic, Moscow was laid as an outpost of the Horde in the western direction ..., the Great The Principality of Lithuania and Muscovy are different states ....
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +1
          30 March 2019 15: 12
          It’s not a shame to be an ugrofin .... as well as a shame to be a Litvin ..., Russia is the name of the military feudal estate ..., anyone can be Russian - the main thing they would accept ..., Here are all kinds of natives from all sorts of tribes and places they took control of the way from the Varangians to the Greeks, they called themselves Rus and declared that they would divert streams ....
          1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        30 March 2019 19: 35
        Quote: wooja
        Litvinas - descendants of the Baltic tribes

        Lithuania is a Baltic people. Balts are the totality of tribes of the Baltic language group. It also included the Prussians, Yatvyags, Galindians ("golyad" in Russian).
        Quote: wooja
        Slovene-- one of many tribes of supposedly Finno-Ugric origin.

        The first time I hear about it. Hope that last. Slovenia - the closest relatives of the Baltic Slavs, that part of them that migrated eastward and settled near Ilmen. Evidence - the mass, including archaeological.
        Quote: wooja
        Moscow was laid as an outpost of the Horde in the western direction.

        Another nonsense. Moscow stood when no Horde was ever in sight.
        Quote: wooja
        The Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Muscovy are different states ....

        The only true statement, with the exception that people who spoke Russian never called their state Muscovy. Muscovy - the name coined by the Poles.
        Read the good Ukrainian historian Petro Tolochko. He very sensibly explains the origin of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians.
        1. +1
          30 March 2019 20: 49
          Moscow ... naturally did not immediately become Moscow ...., but the place known and trading junction of Lithuanian lands and Mokshansky, before the arrival of Dolgoruky, was called Kuchkovo .... , a cult place of worship of Veles or the bear, the Cathedral of Christ the Savior-- the temple of Veles ..., Golyad is one of the names of the bear ..., Moscow thoroughly blocked oxygen to the cities of the Golden Ring from the west ....
  15. +1
    30 March 2019 20: 00
    ...... According to archaeological sites, the lands of the Golden Horde extended beyond the Volga, and never the Russian principalities were not part of it. Russia and the Horde were united by allied relations, because both states were inhabited by the same ethnic group and spoke the same language. The Türkic language in both territories was the language of communication with the southern peoples, and there has never been any Tatar-Mongol yoke in Russia. This has been proven by many modern scholars, but Tatar nationalists believe otherwise ........
  16. 0
    31 March 2019 07: 47
    The sabers have interesting sabers in miniatures
    1. 0
      13 June 2019 08: 42
      One and a half grip and guard increased?
  17. 0
    14 June 2019 22: 04
    respected author about Yuri Danilovich, who had “mustered up the courage” - there was no way to go to visit the Khan. you could wait for the call. Roofing so
  18. 0
    19 June 2019 21: 58
    If the author had revealed the topic _ Rape in Russia and in the Golden Horde: what they looked like, then I dare to think that it would be a bomb. And so, yes, in comparison with the Turkish or Italian zhivinki in fact, both we and our older Tatars are small poets without imagination and scope.