Bundeswehr began upgrading tanks to the version of Leopard-2 A7V

44
The Bundestag Budget Committee approved funding of 25 million euros, which will be used to modernize the German main combat tanks "Leopard 2". The same amount will be used to purchase 155-mm ammunition for the PzH-2000 self-propelled howitzer.


Main battle tank Leopard-2 A7V




101 The Leopard-2 main battle tank of the A6M A2 and A6 variant must be upgraded to a level similar to the latest Leopard-2 A7V. The goal is to adapt to Leopard-2 A7V in terms of operation and logistics.

The entire cycle of work must be completed before the 2026-th year. The Department of Defense also stated that tank systems will be standardized to make them more efficient, increase protection and allow crew exchanges.

About the project of modernization of tanks in service with the Bundeswehr, they started talking about 3 years ago. At the moment, the German army is armed with 225 tanks, their number should increase to 320.

In September, 2017, the information was published that Rheinmetall received an order to participate in the modernization of the 104 Leopard 2 battle tanks. Judging by the delivery time, the voiced tranches were allocated to finance this particular program.

Tracked vehicles had to be brought to the level of Leopard-2 A7V. The total cost of the upgrade package and other services was about 118 million euros.

Rheinmetall upgrades a total of 68 Leopard 2 A4, 16 Leopard 2 A6 and 20 Leopard 2 A7 to the modern version of A7V. The order includes the replacement of an outdated fire control system and computer control panel, a software update, and the installation of a new eye-safe laser range finder. A new thermal imaging device will also be added.

The work that Rheinmetall will carry out is part of a project to increase the number of Leopard 2 already in the ranks of the Bundeswehr. In addition to the upgrading elements already mentioned, Rheinmetall is also responsible for the supply of a new weapon system with improved L55A1 characteristics. It will be equipped with 68 Leopard 2 A4.

As for the guns, tanks equipped with new guns will be able to fire the next generation of armor-piercing ammunition in the higher pressure range. According to Rheinmetall, all 104 A7V Leopard-2 can then use the new DM11 programmable multipurpose munitions that have already been purchased by several NATO countries.

The first converted serial battle tank Leopard 2 A7V will be delivered to the 2020 year. It is not clear why the initial data differs from the current data, but other large-scale information on the modernization of the MBT has not been received. It is possible that the 3 tank was re-equipped as part of the preparation of the technological process for mass modernization, which is common practice.

In addition, the Budget Committee agreed to purchase about 32 thousand 155 mm caliber shells for the PzH-2000 self-propelled howitzer. Shells will be delivered by 2023 in eight batches.

DM121 projectiles are designed to more effectively combat conventional and lightly armored targets, as well as infrastructure in the long-range positions. Ammunition is crucial for the rapid deployment of the Panzer Howitzer 2000 howitzer to mobile combined teams. Replenishment of ammunition volumes is necessary to restore the spent shells and maintain the minimum stock required by the NATO treaty.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    26 March 2019 10: 22
    Bundeswehr began upgrading tanks to the version of Leopard-2 A7V


    Before this?


    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/A7V
    1. +6
      26 March 2019 10: 25
      At the moment, the German army is armed with 225 tanks, their number should increase to 320.

      Shame and shame on my head crying ... I do not know how many tanks in the DPR are "underway" and "mothballed" to... And no one knows for sure. lol

      But I know for sure that "for two" with the LPR, we have more of them than the Bundeswehr wink
      1. +3
        26 March 2019 10: 35
        Well, if you take the tantrums from Kiev as a basis, then you have more of them than the Germans and French combined)
        1. -1
          26 March 2019 10: 41
          Quote: Bull Terrier
          Well, if you take the tantrums from Kiev as a basis, then you have more of them than the Germans and French combined)

          In fact, I can’t operate with absolute numbers, I don’t have such information, and even more so I don’t have the right to disclose it, if I knew.
          But according to rumors, the tanks TAM, TAM, TAM and somewhere else TAM stand, the crews are waiting ...

          But these are rumors (OBS). I did not disclose anything lol .
          1. -1
            26 March 2019 10: 42
            Yes and no need) Gunpowder will tell everything from the stands)))
            1. -1
              26 March 2019 10: 48
              Quote: Bull Terrier
              Gunpowder will tell everything from the stands)))

              And we give him such a picture, here with such an onboard ... wink

      2. +1
        26 March 2019 14: 35
        More than half of Europe))

        And yes, the office with the airborne did not fall))
    2. +2
      26 March 2019 11: 09
      Quote: Dr. Barmaley
      Before this?

      In fairness, I note that the A7V was one of the best tanks of its period. The best I would call a little-known (and made in just two pieces) Fiat 2000.
      1. +3
        26 March 2019 11: 33
        Quote: Kuroneko
        In fairness, I note that the A7V was one of the best tanks of its period.

        The best 1 MV tank was the Renault FT, Automitrailleuse à chenilles Renault FT modèle 1917
        Almost all modern machines lead their family tree from his concept.

        And everything else became the property of history either almost as a curiosity, or as a dead end branch.

        1. +4
          26 March 2019 11: 40
          Quote: Separ DNR
          The best tank of 1 MV was Renault FT

          The best heavy tank, so understandable?
          And as for the FT-17, its copy, Fiat 3000, among Italians, turned out even better.
          1. -2
            26 March 2019 11: 43
            Quote: Kuroneko
            The best heavy tank, okay?

            Yes Yes And so, you see, learn to more fully express your thoughts.
            1. +1
              26 March 2019 11: 59
              Quote: Separ DNR
              And so, you see, learn to more fully express your thoughts.

              I'll see in my schedule if there is time ...
              1. -5
                26 March 2019 12: 03
                Quote: Kuroneko
                I'll see in my schedule if there is time ...


                Kittens (like adult cats) are able to be in a dormant state from 12 to 20 hours.

                Good to sleep! March mice to catch!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. +2
    26 March 2019 10: 35
    Who can explain why they tried to merge the tower with the body in the profile before, and now everyone is making an awesome zaman?
    Moreover, they write: "The bevel itself usually has a high anti-projectile resistance due to the location of the armor at an angle; however, when a projectile hits this bevel, there may be a ricochet into another part of the tank (often a shell hitting the beveled part of the armor , reflected down into the relatively thin armor of the hull roof), which can be fatal. "
    1. +1
      26 March 2019 11: 02
      Quote: Ural-4320
      Who can explain

      I'll try .. The main armor of the tower does not have such bevels. So what we see is most likely screens for protection against godfathers, and the crowbar will flash like foil.

      2.07 .. very clearly visible profile of the Leo2 tower, without screens.
      1. +6
        26 March 2019 11: 13
        Slightly Tiger runs, never seen him at such speeds. Yes, the Germans are true to themselves in the appearance of tanks.
        1. mvg
          +11
          26 March 2019 11: 54
          never seen him at such speeds

          This is the most frisky and maneuverable in the T-34 directories. The German T-3 on the highway (tested in the USSR before the war) showed 73 km / h. But the Panther’s maneuverability and average speed was greater than that of the T-34, and the Tiger (after fine-tuning) quite decently ran, 43 km / h, plus a smooth ride.
      2. -2
        26 March 2019 11: 44
        Quote: dvina71
        .What we see, most likely screens for protection against godfathers,

        This is just a passive defense, the Germans stuck on the outside what the Russian "T" has inside.
      3. 0
        26 March 2019 22: 11
        Quote: dvina71
        Quote: Ural-4320
        Who can explain

        I'll try .. The main armor of the tower does not have such bevels. So what we see is most likely screens for protection against godfathers, and the crowbar will flash like foil. 2.07 .. very clearly visible profile of the Leo2 tower, without screens.
        Mother is my grove! They have different towers! And protection against godfathers is not visible at last! Neither here nor there.
    2. +1
      26 March 2019 11: 05
      Quote: Ural-4320

      Who can explain why they tried to merge the tower with the body in the profile before, and now everyone is making an awesome zaman?


      Well, looking where and who. And most importantly - with modern anti-tank guided missile systems and tank guidance systems, the low profile of tanks became less important. But given the fact that zabronevy space need more to work more efficiently ...
      1. +3
        26 March 2019 11: 15
        So I remembered the T-90, in which the tower also looks hanging over the hull like a flying saucer.
        In Kubinka climbed into the T-72 (or T-80), as there is little space. what
        1. +1
          26 March 2019 12: 26
          But at full speed on the road you are not abandoned throughout the fighting compartment. Here, as in public transport: the more people the easier it is to stand))))
      2. -4
        26 March 2019 11: 16
        Quote: Pimply
        most importantly, with modern ATGMs and tank guidance systems, the low profile of tanks has become less important. But given the fact that the reserved space needs more to work more efficiently ...

        How to say ... If I am not mistaken, just the "Leopard" has only one engine compartment occupies about 7m / cubic meter, despite the fact that whole T-90 - about 12m / cube ... (if you make a mistake, correct it).
        And such a whopper as "Leo", the ATGM will "draw" before the "low-profile car" ...

        And "work efficiency", a larger reserve space, is needed where the loading loader is a negro ...

        1. mvg
          +3
          26 March 2019 12: 02
          And such a whopper as "Leo", the ATGM will "draw" before the "low-profile car" ...

          How then they fought on huge Chieftains and Centurions against the "small" T-54/55 and T-62, and even won multiple times. And in the beginning they fought in general on 3-meter Super Shermans.
          Here is the profile photo in pictures
          http://btvt.narod.ru/1/tank3.htm
          1. -3
            26 March 2019 12: 28
            Quote: mvg
            How then they fought on huge Chieftains and Centurions against the "small" T-54/55 and T-62, and even won multiple times. And in the beginning they fought in general on 3-meter Super Shermans.

            Are we talking about a tank battle ("tank duel") or about the "Tank-ATGM" confrontation?
            1. mvg
              +3
              26 March 2019 12: 50
              Are we talking about a tank battle ("tank duel") or about the "Tank-ATGM" confrontation?

              Doesn't it fit together? The Syrians did not even disdain to use anti-tank systems
              1. -5
                26 March 2019 12: 59
                Quote: mvg
                Doesn't it fit together?

                I responded to Pupyrchaty's comment: And most importantly - with modern ATGMs and tank guidance systems, the low profile of tanks has become less important.
                There was no talk of any "combinations" in it (comments).

                And in general, our punctuation resembles a child's argument: "Who is stronger than a whale, or an elephant?"
                Only the new Prokhorovka will show which concept is more advantageous.
                1. +2
                  26 March 2019 18: 48
                  And most importantly - with modern ATGMs
                  And what is the difference between modern ATGM and not modern? The principle of operation is the same for everyone. Or did you decide to talk about ATGMs like Javelin?
                2. -3
                  26 March 2019 20: 36
                  Quote: Separ DNR
                  Only the new Prokhorovka will show which concept is more advantageous.

                  was already in 1972
  3. +1
    26 March 2019 10: 41
    Are the Germans in the VO? I would like to ask a couple of questions.
    1. +6
      26 March 2019 11: 06
      Are the Germans in the VO?

      Give up!!!
      1. 0
        26 March 2019 11: 24
        Quote: novel xnumx
        Give up!!!


        Hande Hoch!
        1. +2
          26 March 2019 11: 42
          Merkel Kaput!
  4. +4
    26 March 2019 11: 01
    Yes, the Germans do not spend too much on military equipment, they have only 225 tanks, being the most powerful economy in Europe.
    1. -1
      26 March 2019 11: 27
      If they are under an American umbrella, then it makes no sense to waste money on weapons. They can be spent on something more valuable to life. wink
      1. +2
        26 March 2019 14: 00
        Quote: bessmertniy
        If they are under an American umbrella, then it makes no sense to waste money on weapons. They can be spent on something more valuable to life. wink

        An interesting thing is that Kaiser and Hitler Germany participated in two world massacres, having spent a lot of human and material resources in them, for the sake of economic dominance in Europe. And it gained this dominance peacefully by creating economic and political alliances with European countries under the auspices of the United States. request
      2. 0
        27 March 2019 00: 54
        Quote: bessmertniy
        If they are under an American umbrella, then it makes no sense to waste money on weapons. They can be spent on something more valuable to life. wink

        Yes Yes...
        US President Donald Trump again demanded that Berlin increase financial support for the North Atlantic Alliance. He made the corresponding claims on Friday, June 29, in a conversation with reporters on board the presidential airliner Air Force One on its way to New Jersey, where its private golf club is located.
        "Germany should transfer more funds," he said, adding that similar requirements apply to France and Spain.


        https://www.dw.com/ru/трамп-потребовал-от-фрг-увеличить-взносы-в-нато/a-44467636
    2. -2
      26 March 2019 11: 37
      Quote: Semurg
      Yes, the Germans do not spend too much on military equipment, they have only 225 tanks, being the most powerful economy in Europe.

      The Germans could have been wasted more and the States wouldn’t allow it, for the budget of the eyes and eyes, the main thing that NATO would do deductions), and the US bases were fed.
    3. mvg
      +2
      26 March 2019 12: 05
      What for? Does someone threaten them? Well, besides the Arab refugees? Only mother USSR / Russia can afford 20K + tanks and 7K + aircraft. Yes, half the world was torn as much.
  5. 0
    26 March 2019 13: 37
    Good to sleep! March of mice to catch! [/ Quote]
    Quote: Separ DNR
    [quote = Kuroneko] I will look in my schedule if there is time ...


    Kittens (like adult cats) are able to be in a dormant state from 12 to 20 hours.

    Good to sleep! March mice to catch!


    This is about me laughing laughing
  6. -1
    26 March 2019 13: 43
    Quote: mvg
    What for? Does someone threaten them? Well, besides the Arab refugees? Only mother USSR / Russia can afford 20K + tanks and 7K + aircraft. Yes, half the world was torn as much.

    Is Mother Russia in danger either? Or do we have an "American umbrella" so that we spend not on defense, but on social services? Or do we have nothing to defend?
    1. -4
      26 March 2019 18: 00
      What should we protect? Cities are not being bombed en masse now. What difference does it make who will rob our country? The fortune of billionaires is growing from year to year, and the amount of real money in the population has been decreasing since 2014. For comparison, take the countries that were "occupied" by the United States - Germany, Japan, Italy, South Korea. All these countries were also destroyed by the war, and where are they now and where are we. We no longer have that special culture that was in the Russian empire and especially in the USSR. What to lose or what will change?
      1. -2
        26 March 2019 18: 38
        A hint of "drinking Bavarian"?
        Well, come on, if you have nothing to lose ... Let's stand under the "umbrella".
        And well-fed rats - yes, they rushed about first under the bombs. But now they obediently go to the tune - where is Nils leading them. And "step right-step left-jump in place" ...
        And I already asked many mourners here: in what is poverty expressed in Russia in us? In crowded supermarkets, or a stream of all-wheel drive cars on the road?
        Or am I misunderstanding something?
        1. 0
          31 March 2019 00: 56
          And I live better in Russia than 99% of the population. Russia has no more great goals, does not have its own culture (now we have a special kind of Western culture), where are we going and why? How resources, time, opportunities are squandered - this heart is bleeding. And poverty is expressed that my father-in-law has a salary of 3500 r, mother-in-law 12000 r, and there is no other job, as soon as he quit, several people came to take his place at once. All who are young left for Moscow.