Will Turkey have an aircraft carrier with F-35B on board?

Regardless of whether the F35-B fighters appear in Turkey, the Anadolu aircraft carrier will be one of the most important ships in the entire history Turkish fleet. Which missions he will have to participate in depends largely on the future political decisions of the Turkish government: how close it will be with the United States, how the problems between Turkey and Greece will be regulated, how it will communicate with Russia. Anadolu will be able to become a valuable participant in resolving any of these issues.

Within two years, the Turkish Navy will receive TCG Anadolu - the largest warship in the Turkish fleet. But the future of Anadolu will largely determine the nature of the relationship between Ankara and Washington.

Juan Carlos I type ships

"Anadolu" is the fourth ship built on the model and likeness of the landing ship-aircraft carrier "Juan Carlos", which was commissioned by the Spanish Navy in 2010 year. Australian ships of the same project Canberra and Adelaide appeared in the Australian fleet in the 2014 and 2015 years. The Spanish shipbuilding company Navantia won a construction contract in cooperation with the Turkish company Sedef Shipbuilding Inc. The Spaniards designed the future "Anadolu" and carried out all the necessary design checks, and their Turkish colleagues agreed and organized the construction in Turkey. The ship will be ready for testing in the 2022 year.

Anadolu will have a displacement of 28000 tons at full load, length - 230 meters, speed 21 node (39 km / h). Initially, the Anadolu was conceived as a landing ship, but later it was decided to equip it with an aircraft carrier platform compatible with the F-35B fighter jets. Spanish Juan Carlos is integrated with AV-8B Harrier II aircraft, the design of which will soon celebrate its fortieth anniversary. If Spain buys the F-35B, the Juan Carlos will be upgraded for new fighters. Two Australian ships are intended only for amphibious operations, although soon Australia may also modify them under the F-35B.

According to preliminary information, "Anadolu" can be used in two versions - as an amphibious-cargo-aircraft carrier (emphasis on the wing) and to a greater extent it is a landing ship. In the first case, the ship can accommodate up to twelve F-35B. Anyway, until now, no one knows for sure whether Turkey will get fighters.

Why are Turkish F-35B at risk?

It is unlikely that Turkey will want to buy outdated Harriers from Spain, so the role of Anadolu depends directly on F35-B. The interest of the Turkish Navy in these fighters is due, among other things, to the fact that the Turks would like to use the Anadolu as a landing-cargo ship. In addition, Turkey is participating in a project to create F-35 type fighters.

The main problem for Turkey is the aggravation of relations between Washington and Ankara. First, no one wants to forget about trying to overthrow the regime of Turkish President Recep Erdogan in 2016, and about the difference in views on the Syrian conflict. Secondly, Turkey is showing its interest in purchasing Russian C-400 air defense systems, which goes against the US sanctions regime against Russia.

Third, the United States is not completely sure whether they want to allow Turkey to increase its expeditionary capabilities so much. Rumors have repeatedly arisen that Lockheed Martin and the United States Air Force discussed the exclusion of Turkey from the F-35 project.

Future missions “Anadolu”

Anadolu will significantly expand the capabilities of Turkey in the Black and Mediterranean Seas. Despite the thaw between Russia and Turkey, the Anadolu will become one of the main NATO ships in the Black Sea, even if there are no fighters on it. If Ankara continues to spoil relations with the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance, then Anadolu could become a serious threat to the security of Greece.

In any case, Anadolu will allow Turkey to take an active part in rescue and humanitarian operations in the region.

According to the materials Telegram channel
"Brussels snitch"

Comments

[The Siberian barber]

..to his Black Sea ...

[Mavrikiy]

In-in, opposite the Crimea.

Which missions he will have to participate in depends largely on the future political decisions of the Turkish government: how close it will be with the United States, how the problems between Turkey and Greece will be regulated, how it will communicate with Russia.

It's like "Take the tomatoes, or else!" or "How much, how much for gas?"
Rave. And with the Greeks, this is serious.

[The Siberian barber]

Rave! I agree!))))
And "with the Greeks": then Russia will help, for the Orthodox, zheZh ...))))

[Pivot]

Yes, what kind of Orthodox they are, they will sell us as soon as possible, let them understand themselves.

[The Siberian barber]

Quote: Pivot

Yes, what kind of Orthodox they are, they will sell us as soon as possible, let them understand themselves.

Gelendzhik, like a litmus!)))

[Pivot]

If they sold their country, then they will sell someone else's and they will not blink an eye.

[The Siberian barber]

I am little interested in how "they have")
It hurts me "like us"

[Pivot]

Mutually, so that it’s not like they don’t need to be “friends” with them, they will teach us bad things.

[The Siberian barber]

And, here, I agree with you!
I always believed that Turkey, like Great Britain, is our NATURAL adversary! (The essence of the contradiction is long)
And, PLAYINGS, (special vydilil), will not lead to anything good !!
All the tricks of "HPP", etc., are due to the absence of a long-term policy. Essno, as a layman, everything is not obvious to me, BUT, I understand the "situationality", which confirms, personally, my fears of the weakness of the positions of our guys who jumped to the top of geopolitics

[Pivot]

Our guys will be ruined, if something doesn’t work, they will call Sergey Kuzhugedovich.

[The Siberian barber]

And sho?)
He is generally not a panacea!)))
The trouble is that the "guys" EXACTLY are trying to Razrulit)))
Tokma, there is a conflict of interest)))) without the participation of the "plebs" who knows how "it was", "is", and "will be"
Go, sit down, in ALL chairs!)))

[Pivot]

Yes, everything is fine, I rephrase the classic “do not read liberal newspapers before eating, they are guaranteed to cause indigestion”

[The Siberian barber]

Well, this is a common phrase, with which I agree!

[Telakh]

Is the F35 so good that it needs an aircraft carrier to fly over the Aegean?

[Pivot]

This is not an aircraft carrier but an expeditionary ship with a docking chamber for landing. Turkey has interest in both Arab countries and Africa. This barge will definitely not be superfluous.

[Telakh]

Good. And the F-35 is not a bomb carrier, but an element of network-centric warfare to gain air superiority. With all other tasks, starting with the Papuans and ending with the fanatics, F16 will cope, the flight hour of which costs 15 times cheaper. Otherwise, it turns out that first you get an electron microscope, then the power station to it, and again they will have to hammer in nails.

[dinos]

Cynical statements in relation to other peoples, in this case to Greek, show a complete lack of knowledge of world history and, ultimately, no knowledge of the history of one’s people.
Whom and when did the Greeks betray or sell? Give examples .

And note - Orthodoxy Russia adopted from the Byzantine Empire, as a matter of fact, the alphabet, where the only official language was Greek.

[Pivot]

The Greeks in NATO, then against us, they say they will attack Russia, they will take up arms and go like nice. We are called brothers, in those cases when it is very bad. Let them live for themselves, they have brothers in Germany and in America.

[dinos]

Again, let us turn to history. In 1943, after Stalingrad, the Germans decided to carry out general mobilization in Greece to send Greek formations to the Eastern Front. About 300.000 demonstrators under machine guns burned the ministry together with ready mobilization summons (several hundred demonstrators were killed). And this is in the country occupied by the Nazis, where else was this? . After that, the Germans sent several of their divisions from Northern Greece to the Eastern Front, and military units of the Bulgarian fascists sent to their place, who refused to go to the Eastern Front, explaining this by the Slavic brotherhood with the Russian people, but their atrocities in Northern Greece are commensurate with the Nazis. As for NATO: Greece became a member of this bloc after the defeat of the patriotic pro-communist forces in the Civil War (1946-1949), where their opponents were pro-Western pro-fascist troops organized and not heavily armed by the Anglo-Saxons and under the direct command of an American general (Van Fleet). T.ch. anti-NATO sentiments in Greek society, believe me, are simply enormous.

[Pivot]

Well, if anti-NATO sentiments are huge, why are they still in NATO?

[dinos]

Already left NATO in 1974, after the occupation by the Turks with NATO support from Northern Cyprus. And then began with increasing territorial claims to Greece from Turkey (which had not happened before). In! 981, Greece returned to the bloc, hoping to nullify these squats, which of course did not happen.
T.ch. and the Turkish carrier and F-35 and S-400 Turks intend to use only against Greece because there is simply no other in the district to which such high-tech weapons can be used for purely economic reasons ..

[Pivot]

Let Greece and Turkey solve their problems themselves, Greece has chosen its own path and let them go.

[dinos]

You are right about the roads. So did the Greeks betray or sell someone? The answer is no, nobody and moreover, will not fulfill any anti-Russian orders, which is confirmed by its history of many thousands.

[Pivot]

And who voted for sanctions against us in the European Union?

[dinos]

S-400 of course.

[bayard]

Quote: dinos

S-400 of course.

So this is your choice. There can be no grudges.

[Pivot]

Yes, yes, even a shred of wool with a filthy sheep, otherwise the brothers only ask for fraternity, but we ourselves need to eat it.

[dinos]

For Greece, the obvious choice is because it concerns nat. I want to remind you of the high security and the threats that came from the same Turks when Cyprus bought the S-300 from Russia and in order not to aggravate the situation, this complex was stored in Crete, but for Russia, after the Su-24 was shot down, the ambassador was killed, everyone Turkish statements on Crimea and the desire to stake out a part of Syrian territory - the choice is not entirely obvious.

[parkello]

business is business ... and the Turks are doing the right thing. they know them poorly. those who knew them well would rather have them burned. St. John of Russia (Prokopi village, island of Chalkida)

[just exp]

the article has a bunch of mistakes, starting from the fact that the ship will be ready in 2012, and ending with a displacement of 207 thousand tons.
in mattresses AB it is 2 times less.

[Mavrikiy]

В course two years, the Turkish Navy will receive TCG Anadolu - the largest warship in the Turkish fleet.

Write in Russian! Through two years...

[AlexVas44]

Rescue and humanitarian operations are welcome. Combat operations in the Black Sea, here it is necessary to reflect. The Black Sea, although small, but here you can go to the bottom. It is only necessary to decide - who is the enemy.

[bayard]

Quote: AlexVas44

The Black Sea, although small, but here you can go to the bottom. It is only necessary to decide - who is the enemy.

Of course Georgia! Well, not Russia, right? There is also Romania, Bulgaria. All NATO sisters or candidates. And Turkey is just a candidate for withdrawal from NATO ... So apparently Georgia is all the same ... Well, that's fine ...

[vvvjak]

Yes, on which X do they need him at all. In the Black Sea, it is useless. To Crete or Greece will fly without an aircraft carrier. A suitcase without a handle for me is a katstsa.

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: vvvjak

A suitcase without a handle for me is a katstsa.

Looks like however.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: vvvjak

In the Black Sea, it is useless.

Well, why? It is quite useful as a means of covering their own frigates, which perform the functions of PLO of the native coast. We have a Varshavyanka and a naval aviation regiment in the Crimea, both of which must be confronted, and an AB for a dozen F-35s is a good deterrent from our Su-30s if they operate at a radius close to the limit.
That is, the Turks will not be able to move to our shores (unless "hit-and-run", and this, by the way, will be unpleasant for us, although not fatal), but this aircraft carrier will allow to strengthen its PLO.

Quote: vvvjak

To Crete or Greece will fly without an aircraft carrier

But if it will be necessary to landing, or patrolling the same frigates? AB is indispensable here

[vvvjak]

Here I do not agree with you.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

OK, no question. I have given my arguments, and whether or not to agree with them or not is your will, boyar :)))))

[vvvjak]

The children freed the computer, I bet. The Black Sea is completely shot through by coastal anti-ship missiles from the Crimea and in the event of aggression from Turkey against the Russian Federation, their AV will sail for 5 minutes (like all frigates to a heap). Keeping AV to intimidate countries like Ukraine, Georgia, Bulgaria is a bit silly. And at the expense of the Mediterranean Sea - you can buy 50-60 ground-based Fu-35 (for the same money) and "nightmare" the Greeks. The landing of troops on the territory of Greece is better to be carried out under the guise of emigrants in rubber boats, it looks like a more likely event than under the cover of AB.

[Oquzyurd]

In the future, Turkey’s arm will go far than these coastal seas. They think more globally and the fleet is slowly equipping, not for tomorrow, but for the future. With a GDP of about 900 mln. and annual economic growth of 7-8%, they are already capable of more than they think about them.

[vvvjak]

Quote: Oquzyurd

Turkey’s arm will go far in future than these coastal seas

Maybe let, for starters, solve the issues with the Kurds. And while with the help of future aircraft carriers they will conquer Europe, those half of Turkey will be cut off.

[Oquzyurd]

Your comment proves that you do not know Turkey and the Turks. This country is a lump and nothing will happen to them. And their goal, economic interests are not Europe, but Africa and the Middle East. And there in the coming decades it will have to protect about Turkish countries and their interests. Already now in Africa there is serious competition and graters between the colonialist companies of Africa, France and Britain with Turkish companies.

[irazum]

And how, against the background of this news, they "got excited" in Israel and Greece.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: vvvjak

The Black Sea is completely shot through by coastal anti-ship missiles from the Crimea

Not shot, they have up to 300 km range.

Quote: vvvjak

And to the account of the Mediterranean Sea - you can buy 50-60 Fu-35 land-based (for the same money)

Sorry, but 50 Ф-35 costs even at the most sky-high low prices (say, millions at 90) of 4,5 billion dollars. This Turkish aircraft carrier costs a quarter of this money on its strength, and it’s unlikely

[bayard]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

Quote: vvvjak
The Black Sea is completely shot through by coastal anti-ship missiles from the Crimea

Not shot, they have up to 300 km range.

Andrey, well, "Bastion" is guaranteed to hit 500 km. The Black Sea is completely covered by coastal complexes and strike aircraft. Not about our honor with the Turkish ferry, it's more for their image, for showing the flag and to scare the Greeks. Let them scare.

[bayard]

For an amphibious operation on the islands in the Aegean Sea, this is an amphibious dock ship ... with a flight deck. The Greeks supported the sanctions against Russia, provided the S-300 complexes we supplied for training NATO and Israel aviation ... Well, let them - the Greeks have the S-300, the Turks have the S-400; the Greeks have the Zubr air cushion landing ships, and the Turks have a landing dock ship with a flight deck ...
Everything is fair.

[Keyser soze]

With or without a pen, but enough for the Greeks to go wild. This violates the balance of power between the Greeks and Turks and is bad.

[Oquzyurd]

Turkey is growing before our eyes and ambitions too. They will build several more aircraft carriers in the coming years. In parallel, preparations are underway for the release of their aircraft (mini-jet engines themselves are already being made, and large ones are in the testing phase). They are also producing advanced unmanned aerial vehicles of various purposes, from reconnaissance to combat and will soon be replenished with the AKINCI large combat drone (it can carry up to 4.5 tons of bombs and a rocket), The day is not long that the Turks will still have intercontinental missiles with a nuclear warhead. And we, brothers from Azerbaijan, are happy for them and support them.

[Wolf]

While Vi Bulgaria will be the slaves of the Habsburgs and their history, you will not have anything good. All northwestern Bulgaria is Serbia and always beat! But the Turks will pregazet both you and Grek easy! ;)
“Tacos” of God, my old man is less,
don’t dare you in old age,
now we dare - solunsko јunache
enraged drumi and clerical
me, male, saka and destroy. "
“Hearing”, blue, mark one more.
Your-o-tower of Kraљ V'lkashin,
he’s the sunshine of a girl,
Toјa Kunak, she did not give birth.
Him, blue, with the cunning над Do not move! “
So yours on the tower of Kralкаa Volkashin!

[Keyser soze]

While Vi Bulgaria will be the slaves of the Habsburgs ..

Hahaha, leave me alone with your Habsburgs .... I have one great-grandmother from Vienna, another from St. Petersburg and I am a friend of the Habsburgs and Romanovs and Winnie the Pooh and all of all ....

[Wolf]

Then to the Habsburgs what are you doing in eastern Europe and the Balkans?

[Oquzyurd]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnI_zoQccHs В этом видео есть отрезок с сороковой секунды до четвертой минуты,где журналист на греческом ТВ с тревогой говорит о развитом Турецком ВПК и приводить конкретные примеры,сожалением добавляя,что это не макеты а реальность.

[Butchcassidy]

Like Ponte in the East, that's for sure. Landing ship - yes, but what for the Turks aircraft carrier? With 12 airplanes? Where do they want to apply it? Some nonsense.

[Wolf]

Admins for what I can’t plus and minus comments? Where is "democracy"?

[Lamatinets]

there is one, but I was silent

[PSih2097]

Quote: Wolf

Admins for what I can’t plus and minus comments? Where is "democracy"?

did plus / minus - refresh the page ...

[Krasnodar]

Real estate in Santorini will fall. Take off, and urgently

[Wolf]

As for geopolitics, Turkey and Greece are in control of Evil Briti. Greece in 1949, and Turtsiu is still about the Krimsk war. Erdogan somehow left the Anglo-Saxons and looks at the Ottoman Empire. But the Anglokras eat Gulen. In general, the name ANGLOSAXI is WRONG !!! Saxony belonged to the LUZHICHKI SERBI !!! Correctly write ENGLISH. The Luzhicani were never in a good relationship with the Franks and Angles. Greeks od 49g. under the terrible occupation of Anglo-rats. They don't choose anything. If the Turks go to Greece, England will simply serve them as they did in Cyprus. We must look at the war in Greece 1941-45. and then Anglo "civilian" 45-49. The Turks can be an ochim of the silni, and this is not a problem only for Greece and for Bulgaria, but also for Israel.

[Wolf]

One must think that in western Turkey there are many descendants of the Rus (Ukrainians), Serbs, Bulgars, Yelins and Islamiziranich Armenians. They all think that they are Turks and good warriors, so their army should always be taken seriously.

[Karenas]

Well, today I’m just reading about the EU’s offer to Turkmens to consider gas supplies bypassing the Russian Federation, through Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey ...
Something tells me that you will have a conflict of interest with them ...

[Lamatinets]

And will they pull the wire across the Caspian? , from here there will be an ambush with coordination.

[Karenas]

Quote: Lamatinets

And will they pull the wire across the Caspian? , from here there will be an ambush with coordination.

Yes, they advise the pipe in the Caspian ... All right steps are moving towards Wanga's forecast for 2024 ....

[Roma 1977]

What if the war starts in Turkmenistan? Then Russian troops will enter there ...

[Karenas]

Everything is possible ... And first of all - the unification of the Turkic countries ...

[Oquzyurd]

When you wrote this, did your hands tremble? Before it’s too late, be friends with the Turks, for 1000 years they lived together.

[Karenas]

It’s all trembling with you ... Your time has run out ... The consequences for you have been voiced by many ...

[Oquzyurd]

Are we in the know? Give a hint of what is voiced and by whom?

[Karenas]

Let's talk in five years, okay?

[Oquzyurd]

Okay. You’re waiting for something for 1000 years, we’ll wait there for another 5 years.

[egor egor]

Yes figs with them are corrupt Greeks, buy Recep with us of course you will take gas, with 400 you will take well and take planes, what are you

[Self]

The Turks can be in an aircraft carrier, Australia puts them on the water every year, in Russia again cartoons? Or did the young secretaries at the Department of Defense at Louis Vuitton spend everything? It is somehow sad that Russia cannot build even a few. In general, in light of the fact that Russia cannot be an aircraft carrier, cannot be packaged, cannot be a fit-out (piece deliveries do not count), it is already hard to believe that tomorrow we will rivet the nuclear reactors that will be pies endlessly plow the expanses of the universes ... of the Atlantic, that is.

[Roma 1977]

Russia can, but does not need it. And the PAK FA and "Armata" are not piece deliveries, but promising samples, whose refinement has already reached the finish line, which neither Turkey nor Australia will be able to repeat even in the future.

[Lamatinets]

The Spaniards make 4 ships (so much more) A GREAT PUTINSKAYA Russia, drowned the PD 50 and damaged its aircraft carrier with a dropped crane. in your own port. !!!!

[Roma 1977]

Least of all Russia needs aircraft carriers such as the Spanish - this is a scanty ersatz, and not a full-fledged strike ship. Moreover, in narrow circles, it is widely believed that Russia generally does not need aircraft carriers because of the lack of tasks for them in the naval doctrine of Russia.

[Lamatinets]

Aya, by the way, is not a supporter of the presence of aircraft carriers with us.

[Roma 1977]

The lack of deck F-35s is not a tragedy for Turkey, well, the ship will be a landing ship, not a pre-aircraft carrier. Turkey itself and as an aircraft carrier - lies on four seas.

[Roma 1977]

"Anadolu" means "Anatolia", as the Turks call their Asia Minor.

[Keyser soze]

Anatolia is the most prosperous province of the Byzantine Empire. And now there are generally villages where they live in dugouts ... And in general, the main problems of Turkey and other Islamic countries are education. I listened once to an interview by General Musharaf (Pakistan), who spoke very cleverly and said that the Muslim world needs education. And so the aircraft carrier or not, but the Turks do not reach Europe very much (here I also include Russia). They are like before Mars ....

[bone1]

Two questions, why the hell the Turks aircraft carrier? -and how will it pass through the straits?

[protoss]

1) Ponte
2) slowly

[bone1]

2mu-like aircraft carriers are forbidden to pass the straits?

[protoss]

these are Turkish straits, the rules of the convention apply to ships of other countries, Turkey itself uses the straits as it wants

[bone1]

When the convention was written, Turkey did not think about aircraft carriers, incl. it could well have failed to pay attention, and the convention does not mention Turkey at all — there are two groups of states — the Black Sea and others — incl. requirements for the Turks as well as for any Black Sea state.

[protoss]

The convention describes the international rules of navigation, for Turkey it is inland navigation. so at least the death star under the Turkish flag can be dragged along the straits

[Fantazer911]

There is a double game between Turkey and Fashington and a game for the public, maybe there is a minor conflict but it is not significant, the states and NATO will benefit from an alliance with the Turks only for the reason that in case of a big mess, many people do not want to share the feather but even in case of their collapse against Russia you can always turn on a fool like my hut from the edge and it's not me but they made

[syndicalist]

While Russia is arguing with Ukraine whose Crimea, the third contender for the peninsula reminded himself.

[Roma 1977]

Eat something to eat, just hto give a hole?

[KARAKURT15]

In the future, plow the oceans. This is not the only aircraft carrier, followed by another ...

[AAK]

Turkey does not need an aircraft carrier for the Black Sea or the Aegean Sea, the Turks have a well-developed network of ground-based air bases and quite serious for the Air Force region, which are enough to participate in a conflict with any of its 2 historical and geopolitical opponents - Iran and Greece, or even with both at the same time. Bulgarians, Georgians, Turks are not rivals in any way, with Russia, a battle at sea will also fail.
In addition, a serious military conflict between Greece and Turkey (in which an aircraft carrier could take part - for example, a Turkish landing operation on the islands of the Aegean archipelago or in Cyprus) will not be tolerated by either the United States or Great Britain, which has every opportunity to "enforce peace "(the bases of the 6th US Navy in Crete, the British Air Force base Akrotiri in Cyprus), especially since after the political and diplomatic conflict with Turkey, the United States began serious processing of the Greeks on the possibility of providing one or two out of a dozen Greek Air Force bases for the US Air Force.
In a one-on-one conflict with Iran, the Turkish mini-aircraft carrier is also not a fighter, neither in Oman nor in the Persian Gulfs, even with 5-6 escort frigates, there is no chance against the Iranian Air Force and Navy, they will simply be overwhelmed by the mass. Well, in the "International Coalition" against Iran, the Turkish aircraft carrier is just a siskin-fawn in comparison with several US AUGs, and the "share in the production", given the shitty outcome of this conflict for Iran, will be too small for Turkey. Moreover, such a war will already specifically stink of the Third World ...
As for the idea expressed by one of my colleagues about the theoretically possible use of "Anadolu" as an "argument" in the struggle for the possibility of control over natural resources in Africa (especially in northern Africa), I find it quite logical and has the right to exist. Take, for example, the same Libya ... Turkey is fighting for leadership in the Islamic world with the Saud, Egypt, Pakistan and the same Iran (although there is still the eternal strife between the Sunnis and Shiites), in Libya there is a mess, each of the local "field commanders" - their own piece of the desert with delicious bowels, and each of them wants to have a profit from his garden, for which he is looking for a "roof" in a more reliable way. From bases on the territory of Turkey it is far to fly there, there will not be enough fuel back, and the flight will be very long with refueling, but a good squadron at a floating airfield near the coast is quite enough, the "Barmaley" have nothing to fly ... So the Turks it is quite capable of forming and politically recognizing some kind of "front for the Islamic liberation of Benghazi from Tripoli", designating this territory as a historically Turkish pashalyk and providing assistance to brothers in faith, here Anadolu will come in handy ...
In conclusion, 2 small remarks:
- there will be 6 mini-aircraft carriers built in El Ferrol, taking into account the Anadolu and the similar projects Principe de Asturias and the Thai Chakri Narubet, there will already be XNUMX, after the Americans - the second largest series, information for thought, however ..
- for a colleague from Serbia, if I was not mistaken, the small amendment, the Slavic people mentioned by him, are the Luzhitsky Orbs.