Military Review

Lukashenko said that the issue of combining the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation today is not worth it

102
The President of Belarus today commented on the issue of the possibility of uniting the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation into a single state. Recall that from a legal point of view, the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation today are part of the Union State, while possessing complete sovereignty.




Speaking at a meeting on economic development and integration policy of the country, Alexander Lukashenko said that the issue of integration with Russia "is not worth it today." At the same time, Lukashenka, as they say, was not ashamed to mention Vladimir Putin in this context.

From the statement of the head of Belarus:
The President of Russia and I have unequivocally determined that today there is no such issue on the agenda.


At the same time, the Belarusian president called the talk about the possibility of unification of the two countries “far-fetched,” adding that “no one will tilt anyone.”

Lukashenko added that today it is necessary to focus on the adoption of the Constitutional Act of the Union State of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation. The act must contain the governing bodies, the single currency and the unified policy. Lukashenko, however, claims that Russia had previously refused to go this way.

According to the head of the Belarusian state, he noted that integration within the framework of the Union State should be jointly discussed at a round table.

Lukashenko also touched upon the possibility of obtaining autocephalous status by the Belarusian Orthodox Church. Lukashenko noted that this issue was often raised against the background of the well-known situation in Ukraine. President of Belarus noted: The BOC is also developing with its current status.

If countries do not agree on compensation, Lukashenka added, then Russia "may lose an ally."

During the meeting, the President of Belarus added that they talk a lot about unification, but at the same time "do not solve basic questions."
Photos used:
https://ru.depositphotos.com
102 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Evil 55
    Evil 55 10 January 2019 13: 28
    -35
    What a pity ... The president would have been wonderful ...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 10 January 2019 13: 29
      +8
      And in what, would he be beautiful?
      1. cniza
        cniza 10 January 2019 13: 35
        +20
        Sooner or later, but our states will become one.
        1. Underwater hunter
          Underwater hunter 10 January 2019 13: 48
          +15
          Quote: cniza
          Sooner or later, but our states will become one.

          They should be like that .. but as long as Lukashenko is in power, it obviously won't be .. and his son is still growing up and personally I have no doubts who will be the next "president" in Belarus and his policy will be the same as dad taught ..
          1. cniza
            cniza 10 January 2019 13: 50
            +5
            Yes, he will try to do it, but he may not have time ...
            1. hydrox
              hydrox 10 January 2019 14: 12
              0
              Quote: cniza
              Yes, he will try to do it, but he may not have time ...

              Come on, who can stop him? No.
              1. cniza
                cniza 10 January 2019 14: 15
                -1
                Time and he has very little ...
        2. NG inform
          NG inform 10 January 2019 14: 40
          +5
          They will not. In the coming years there will be development according to the Ukrainian scenario - this is already uncontested.
          1. Tarhan
            Tarhan 10 January 2019 14: 58
            -15
            They will not. In the coming years there will be development according to the Ukrainian scenario - this is already uncontested.

            If the Russian Federation does not intervene, as in the Crimea and the Donbass, then there will be no Ukrainian scenario in Belarus.
            1. Altona
              Altona 10 January 2019 15: 06
              +6
              Quote: Tarkhan
              If the Russian Federation does not intervene, as in the Crimea and the Donbass, then there will be no Ukrainian scenario in Belarus.

              -------------------------
              And where to interfere? In Crimea and Donbass, there was rejection of the ideology of modern Ukraine. And what does "Ukrainian scenario" mean? This script was not written in Russia. The scriptwriters there were completely different parties, one of which admitted to producing this "script" for $ 5 billion.
              1. cniza
                cniza 10 January 2019 15: 26
                +3
                The owner of the horses connects the "army of the couch".
              2. NG inform
                NG inform 10 January 2019 20: 36
                0
                Well, here it is not written in Russia. Lukashenko is the most pro-Russian there - and this is with his apparent anti-Russian position.
        3. Xnumx vis
          Xnumx vis 10 January 2019 16: 10
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          Sooner or later, but our states will become one.

          In principle, Russia. Now Belarus is useful in its current status ... We have all sorts of different sanctions, other gadgets. Belarusians are now a bridge between the west and us.
          1. NG inform
            NG inform 10 January 2019 20: 41
            -4
            It is a myth that it is useful. This is her point of view, but in reality she is not any bridge. "The bridge" is a veiled rejection of alliance.
        4. Peter Ivanov
          Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 19: 51
          0
          It will be only at the first stage of Communism - Socialism!
        5. 1 Navigator
          1 Navigator 10 January 2019 21: 47
          0
          Never be this!
        6. Sergei75
          Sergei75 11 January 2019 20: 59
          0
          Do you need it?
          It used to grieve over the USSR, but now, let's say Ukraine wants to unite with us, how many resources need to be swelled there again for a long time? They barely cleared their throat from one bridge.
          In Russia there is something to do, and with the leadership of the problem.
    2. solzh
      solzh 10 January 2019 13: 32
      +3
      Quote: Evil 55
      What a pity ... The president would have been wonderful ...

      Who! Lukashenko or Putin?
      1. Russia
        Russia 10 January 2019 13: 37
        +8
        In the east, Abe wants, but cannot, and in the west Lukashenko can, but does not. smile
        1. Peter Ivanov
          Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 20: 00
          0
          Does the rabbit wish to be eaten by a boa constrictor? Of course not! We wish Belarusians steadfastness in confrontation with the capitalists and bankers of the Russian Federation - with these ghouls!
      2. Egorovich
        Egorovich 10 January 2019 13: 41
        +25
        Give us cheap oil and gas, and we will give you "our" shrimps and pineapples at Western prices. This is Lukashenka's entire "fraternal" policy.
        1. Major Yurik
          Major Yurik 10 January 2019 14: 11
          +3
          Quote: Egorovich
          Give us cheap oil and gas, and we will give you "our" shrimps and pineapples at Western prices. This is Lukashenka's entire "fraternal" policy.

          Lukashenko cannot unite, because he did not recognize the Crimea as Russian, but he will join the state with territories unrecognized by you! laughing
        2. hydrox
          hydrox 10 January 2019 14: 31
          +2
          Quote: Egorovich
          and we will give you "our" shrimps and pineapples at western prices.

          So it would suit us in the Western countries, but there is another 300% wound up in favor of Belarusian and Russian intermediaries and their money involved in D-T-D operations, plus tax kickbacks, excise taxes, duties ... or somebody that considers customs an example of statehood ??
      3. dorz
        dorz 10 January 2019 13: 50
        +3
        Quote: solzh
        Quote: Evil 55
        What a pity ... The president would have been wonderful ...

        Who! Lukashenko or Putin?

        Probably Kim Jong-un. laughing
      4. aws4
        aws4 10 January 2019 18: 57
        -1
        Of course Lukashenko. a real ruler who is currently fighting with the Russian allegor
        1. Peter Ivanov
          Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 20: 01
          0
          Verily, as it is!
    3. New Year day
      New Year day 10 January 2019 13: 36
      +1
      Quote: Angry 55
      The president would be great.

      Who are you talking about?
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 10 January 2019 13: 37
      -5
      Lukashenko is right. When he signed the union treaty, Yeltsin promised him to command the Union in turn. But, however, he threw the dad at the breeder. lol
      1. Basil50
        Basil50 10 January 2019 13: 44
        +4
        sibiralto
        Why do you suddenly have such an opinion?
        Lukashenko promised a lot of things and signed a lot of things, if only Belarus and Lukashenko would be fed, it is interesting to calculate the percentage of fulfilled promises.
        1. hydrox
          hydrox 10 January 2019 14: 41
          -1
          Quote: Vasily50
          It is interesting to calculate the percentage of completed promises.

          And also to calculate trillions of rubles, billions of dollars, billions of cubes and hundreds of millions of tons ...
          No, MZKT is also a good thing, but is it too expensive for us? request
          1. Peter Ivanov
            Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 20: 03
            -3
            You personally - no way! But the capitalists of the Russian Federation, have long wanted to gobble up the economy of the BSSR!
            1. hydrox
              hydrox 10 January 2019 21: 42
              +2
              It seems to you that in any way (or you are too young to comprehend the content of the concept of "national heritage"), and those who are from the Union - they know, remember and regret.
              But Putin will not build anything that resembles socialism, because Putin has no education, upbringing, or tradition of the Russian people to understand the essence of socialism; he is imprisoned for liberalism - this is a political and ideological movement that denies collectivism (along with socialism!) , is just a dead end branch of the under-educated intelligentsia (something like a technical school compared to a university!), which will die along with capitalism, and the people that ... the people will live on, continue the Russian race and, most likely, will build socialism.
              1. Peter Ivanov
                Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 21: 51
                -1
                We are doing everything possible to bring back Communism to the republics of our USSR Homeland!
                Greetings to the Bolsheviks!
                NB. In the EU and partly in the USA, Australia ... in the West, today there is Euro-socialism (from the 4th International and Trotskyism)! And Putin is trying to fit into this ...!
        2. siberalt
          siberalt 10 January 2019 15: 19
          0
          Let's talk when dad will bring his son to power over your people. Huh? Or was it not he, together with Yanukovych, "backing away"? One of them had already finished that they ate saved from the Gilyak.
          Something, right after the shit from the free gas, he ran to Merkel to complain about Putin.
    5. Cheslav Tsursky
      Cheslav Tsursky 10 January 2019 14: 09
      +1
      Lukashenka will "tilt" an obviously sore question about this! Maybe a complex? Moreover, listening to him is often simple and frankly not pleasant. I think this comes from the understanding that the further the less personally the fate of the single Russian people and Belarusians depends on him, as an integral part of it!
    6. hydrox
      hydrox 10 January 2019 14: 09
      +1
      We have enough of our own, but we would have professionals ...
      But where can I get them when all the posts are filled with Liberty?
    7. ANCIENT
      ANCIENT 10 January 2019 14: 36
      0
      Angry 55 -you about Zhirinovsky? ?? lol
      1. Russia
        Russia 10 January 2019 14: 45
        0
        Among liberals (I consider tribute to fashion and unusualness, at that time, in Zhirinovsky’s choice of this word) Zhirinovsky is a ray of the sun in the dark kingdom. smile
  2. solzh
    solzh 10 January 2019 13: 31
    +9
    At the same time, the Belarusian president called the talk about the possibility of unification of the two countries “far-fetched,” adding that “no one will tilt anyone.”

    If my memory serves me right, Lukashenko came to power with a program in which one of the points was the unification of two fraternal states into one union state, like the USSR. But the matter did not go beyond creation without a customs union for some reason ...
    1. IGU
      IGU 10 January 2019 13: 35
      +4
      If memory serves me right, Lukashenko came to power with a program
      Yes, memory does not change. But this is Lukashenko ... He has always been like that.
    2. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 10 January 2019 13: 48
      -3
      Quote: solzh
      At the same time, the Belarusian president called the talk about the possibility of unification of the two countries “far-fetched,” adding that “no one will tilt anyone.”

      If my memory serves me right, Lukashenko came to power with a program in which one of the points was the unification of two fraternal states into one union state, like the USSR. But the matter did not go beyond creation without a customs union for some reason ...

      oligarchic and corrupt Belarus, maybe it doesn’t want to? whatbetter let it be ... understand later.
      1. The Little Humpbacked Horse
        The Little Humpbacked Horse 10 January 2019 16: 04
        -2
        Quote: Aerodrome
        oligarchic and corrupt Belarus, maybe it doesn’t want to? what better let it be.


        That is, you are proposing to us in Russia, to increase the retirement age to 70 more, which would continue to contain just such Belarus
    3. Cheslav Tsursky
      Cheslav Tsursky 10 January 2019 14: 14
      +2
      Quote: solzh
      If my memory serves me right, Lukashenko came to power with a program in which one of the points was the unification of two fraternal states into one union state, like the USSR. But the matter did not go beyond creation without a customs union for some reason ...

      You read the union treaty. It is not particularly big .. Then decide what points of it Lukashenka now calls the deprivation of Belarus "sovereignty" (he cannot write this word without quotation marks), and about which he once again says that he is being tipped ...
    4. hydrox
      hydrox 10 January 2019 14: 49
      +1
      Quote: solzh
      Lukashenko came to power with a program in which one of the points was the union

      One can unite when the state has similar political and economic systems, then unification is carried out under the flag of unification of these systems.
      But what if Luka is for socialism, and Putin is categorically against and considers socialism a dead end branch of the development of economic civilization, and to hammer into it that capitalism is already sitting all over the ball in networks of dead ends and absurdities (one Trump is worth it! laughing ) no one has the strength or ability, since the receiver does not have at least some beginning of economically competent common sense ... crying
    5. Peter Ivanov
      Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 20: 06
      -1
      Just like the USSR! And not the takeover of the BSSR, by capitalists and bankers - a constrictor of the Russian Federation!
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 10 January 2019 13: 32
    -3
    Quote: Evil 55
    What a pity ... The president would have been wonderful ...

    If I hadn’t put the cart before the horse! lol
  5. bessmertniy
    bessmertniy 10 January 2019 13: 37
    -1
    For unification, on the one hand, there is not enough political will of our sovereigns, and on the other hand, today there is no such keen desire on the part of our peoples. We must take an example from Germany, which first united, and then already solved the problems of joining the eastern and western lands.
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 10 January 2019 15: 00
      +2
      Quote: bessmertniy
      We must take an example from Germany, which first united,

      These two Germanys also played a lousy role in the fate of Russia.
      When they were combined, it was clear that the cooperative-socialist economy would be transformed into a capitalist economy, and then everything would roll on an increasing basis.
      Fig you!
      30 years have passed since the reunification of Germany!), But the unification of the people did not happen, just as the interpenetration of economies (capitalist takeover) did not occur! And in the 90s, it was believed that privatization in Russia would take place according to German tracing paper - no, it didn’t happen, as the privatization turned out to be a gangster-thieves and a squint (merit with a voucher pyramid - PERSONALLY Chubais!), Which does not have a LEGITIMATE popular mandate.
  6. To be or not to be
    To be or not to be 10 January 2019 13: 38
    +2
    Quote: Vlad5307
    Quote: Evil 55
    What a pity ... The president would have been wonderful ...

    If I hadn’t put the cart before the horse! lol

    Yeah...
  7. 75 hammer
    75 hammer 10 January 2019 13: 55
    +6
    At a certain stage of development A.G.L. was needed to stabilize the Belarusian society, but now it is a brake on the unification of the (artificially divided) people due to their reactionary small-town desires to remain in power (otherwise they will come for his scalp). History usually puts everything in its place and sweeps away obstacles from its path, there are a lot of examples. Therefore, either it will remain in history, or it will be thrown into a landfill, there are no third options. The choice is for Lukashenka, although VVP would also not be very happy to receive several million people who have not been processed ("zombies"). About "zombies" is a joke, but only partially!
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 10 January 2019 15: 07
      +2
      Quote: Hammer 75
      About "zombies" a joke, but only partially!

      Firstly, not a joke, but 6 million.
      And secondly, against the background of 100 million dissatisfied Russians, 6 million dissatisfied Belarusians do not make the weather, because these 6 and our 140 will not want to unite either - the economic systems are different and the system in Belarus is not as disfigured as the Russian one!
      1. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 10 January 2019 15: 13
        +4
        We have 146 million, they have about 10 million.
        1. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 10 January 2019 15: 52
          +3
          Less then what? For clarifying the population of our countries?)
        2. hydrox
          hydrox 10 January 2019 16: 06
          0
          I did not minus all claims to liberda or patricians.
          I called the estimated figures not the population, but the number of dissatisfied citizens ...
  8. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 10 January 2019 13: 57
    0
    Lukashenko added that today it is necessary to focus on the adoption of the Constitutional Act of the Union State of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation. The act must contain the governing bodies, the single currency and the unified policy. Lukashenko, however, claims that Russia had previously refused to go this way.
    Well, the Old Man is cunning .. Bodies, politics .... At one time, the introduction of the ruble in Belarus was stuck on the issue of the power to print money (roughly speaking) Moscow wanted a single center, and Minsk had its own powers in this matter.
  9. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 10 January 2019 13: 59
    +1
    Unification will happen, a matter of time.
    1. Hypersound
      Hypersound 10 January 2019 14: 05
      +2
      Quote: Alexey-74
      Unification will happen, a matter of time.


      Inevitably
      1. Cheslav Tsursky
        Cheslav Tsursky 10 January 2019 14: 28
        +1
        There can be no doubt about it! Lukashenko is trying to slow down the union but is already somehow sluggish. Trying to bargain. The process of uniting the largest divided people in the world is an absolutely natural and objective thing!
  10. Hypersound
    Hypersound 10 January 2019 14: 00
    -2
    Lukashenko said that the issue of combining Belarus and the Russian Federation today not worth it


    Highlighted a keyword. And in 3-4 years it will rise directly, and Lukashenko will not go anywhere. Pack, no, the Novice box is already set aside fellow laughing
  11. Hypersound
    Hypersound 10 January 2019 14: 02
    0
    Lukashenko added that today it is necessary to focus on the adoption of the Constitutional Act of the Union State of Belarus and the Russian Federation. The act should spell out governing bodies, a single currency and a single policy


    Luke naturally gave up. And where to go, the Russian Federation gives 19% of the Belarusian GDP. The merger (and in fact, absorption) will take place with a probability of at least 100%
  12. Lelek
    Lelek 10 January 2019 14: 05
    0
    ( The act should spell out governing bodies, a single currency and a single policy. At the same time, Lukashenko claims that earlier Russia itself refused to go this way.)

    LAS is disingenuous. It was the Russian side that proposed unification with the Republic of Belarus with the approval of the relevant acts and the signing of a single state. constitution, and Alexander Grygorych stood on its hind legs under the pressure of the "signers" of the Belovezhskaya agreements and Kuchma's "friend". Now in the Republic of Belarus, the pro-Western opposition is gaining strength, which dictates its own conditions and the aging, fat "agronomist" accepts many of their conditions.
  13. 3vs
    3vs 10 January 2019 14: 06
    -2
    Today, no, but by 2024, you look and get up.
    Then it will be possible to choose Comrade Putin for the presidency of the new state a couple of times,
    so that the citizens of Medvedev with the team will reach retirement ...
  14. HAM
    HAM 10 January 2019 14: 09
    0
    Something but father twitched ..... everything resembles a "pension reform" - "it won't be!" And then bam ... and passed ...
    I’m not going to vang, but father is spinning like a stinger .. in Rostov it’s already taken, but the Kuril Islands are quite ..
  15. Rusj
    Rusj 10 January 2019 14: 11
    -2
    They began to talk a lot about it! The campaign is planned to unite in the coming years! Well, for some reason it seems so ....
  16. plotnikov561956
    plotnikov561956 10 January 2019 14: 14
    -8
    Belarus is a sovereign state ...! Now, let's look at our passports for Russian citizens ... and think about how they were issued by the migration service .. Migrants ... so what ?! And what citizenship did we give up ... ERF .. what is this.? Lukashenko looks like an idiot ...? See your passport ... I did not renounce USSR citizenship and not a migrant!
    1. Rusj
      Rusj 10 January 2019 14: 15
      0
      Are you sick friend?
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 10 January 2019 14: 28
      -6
      Quote: plotnikov561956
      .and think about how much they were issued by the migration service .. Migrants ... so how!? And what citizenship have we refused ... ERFiya .. what is it.?

      To the doctor and urgently!
      1. plotnikov561956
        plotnikov561956 10 January 2019 14: 33
        -1
        I recommend ... what's the matter ... And Kiselev’s smaller TV ...
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 10 January 2019 14: 53
          -3
          Quote: plotnikov561956
          And Kiselev’s smaller TV ...

          He also did not recommend watching Kissel TV ...... pouring in
          1. plotnikov561956
            plotnikov561956 10 January 2019 16: 58
            -2
            Synthesize more information from Yu.Boldyrev..M.Delyagina.N. Platoshkina ... V. Zhukovsky, as it’s too small to quote
    3. Astra wild
      Astra wild 10 January 2019 17: 35
      0
      And how do you live without a passport? I know one homeless person (he does not have a new passport, and there are 2 or 3 Soviet ones), but he is unwillingly homeless: his relatives "took care"
  17. Shura Wii
    Shura Wii 10 January 2019 14: 31
    0
    Belarus, and so is almost entirely on the content of Russia, it does not have any sovereignty, there is only a prostitution dad trying to be smart and suck at anyone who has to. Without Russia, it has the prospect of becoming another Bulgaria in the EU, having previously lubricated the Old Man with a duplex vaseline.
    1. Kawado
      Kawado 10 January 2019 16: 53
      0
      loudly said - Bulgaria)))
      To understand what’s going to happen, multiply by 2 rents, gas by 10 and add general unemployment and roads like in the Russian outback, that’s the whole of Bulgaria ...
  18. watchmaker
    watchmaker 10 January 2019 14: 56
    0
    To unite Belarus and Russia, to make one state again, this is great, but we do not need Lukashenko in any position. To have such a friend, and no enemies.
    1. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 10 January 2019 15: 46
      +3
      Ukraine has already joined ..... brilliant foreign policy
      1. Kawado
        Kawado 10 January 2019 16: 48
        -2
        Yes, they messed up a little, they added "not there", you have to remove and insert where necessary ...
        Well, it's okay, it happens ...
        fixable matter
  19. BAI
    BAI 10 January 2019 15: 00
    -1
    The unification of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus into one state - and Putin is the president, Lukashenko - the vice-president - for 2 terms - this is for life.
    1. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 10 January 2019 15: 44
      +5
      The WB forecast ... for 2019 GDP growth of 1.5%, over the past 10 years GDP growth of 1,8% per year ... that is, within the limits of the statistical error ... a poor state cannot be a priori attracted by the union of neighbors ... Give Belarus on the looting of Jews, the oligarchs ... Think about it dear ... Lukashchenko that does not see what is happening in Russia .. on the cartoons he will not lead
      1. vitvit123
        vitvit123 10 January 2019 19: 34
        -1
        Quote: plotnikov561956
        Lukashenko that does not see what is happening in Russia .. on the cartoons, he will not behave

        On cartoons it may not behave, but on oil, gas and loans it will even behave!
        1. Peter Ivanov
          Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 20: 51
          +1
          That is unlikely! Or are you an ordinary blind man?
          1. vitvit123
            vitvit123 10 January 2019 21: 08
            +1
            [quote = Pyotr Ivanov] This is unlikely! Or are you an ordinary blind man? [
            maybe I'm a blind man, maybe a fool! The more I live, the more I understand how much earlier I was stupid and blind!
            Or maybe you are blind? did not ask anyone?
            Whatever happens in Russia, she feeds this territorial entity and only the blind man does not see it! Well this is my opinion ...
            1. Peter Ivanov
              Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 21: 33
              +1
              First: Russia is not the Russian Federation! Russia is the whole USSR! Secondly: Belarusians feed themselves! Less great-power chauvinism, please!
              Well, and for a snack ... Have you been hired by the capitalists and bankers of the Kremlin? It’s not for you that they want to expand the not badly working economy of the BSSR! Look at the root! Kuzma Prutkov also used to say.
              Greetings to the Bolsheviks!
  20. Factory
    Factory 10 January 2019 15: 31
    +5
    Hello everyone and good, I just registered on the site
    1. BAI
      BAI 10 January 2019 15: 48
      +2
      Well, with what and congratulations!
    2. Astra wild
      Astra wild 10 January 2019 17: 23
      +1
      Hello colleague, I’m still a beginner. No, don’t think that I’m OV, but I’m just here
  21. taiga2018
    taiga2018 10 January 2019 16: 11
    +5
    and I am pleased with such statements of Lukashenka, which means that he is dissatisfied, and dissatisfied with the fact that the freebie has ended, which means that despite the New Year's Eve meetings, it was not possible to "dissolve" Putin ...
    1. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 10 January 2019 16: 52
      +1
      Remember the moment when Lukashenka kicked out the raiders from Uralkali ... Lukashenka has more actions ... than promises ... regarding freebies, so this is more to Erdogan ... in terms of the size of freebies.
      1. taiga2018
        taiga2018 10 January 2019 17: 05
        -2
        Quote: plotnikov561956
        Turks get more brotherly people

        according to the level of freebies, it’s possible, but still we didn’t really want much from the Belarusians, and the main thing is to stop being a transit point for sanctions, well, there are no shrimps in the waters of Belarus, and so much milk is not inflated to flood our counters with them, Yes, and we are ready to supply oil only for domestic use, and not for further resale, well, how is it not allied ...
        1. plotnikov561956
          plotnikov561956 10 January 2019 17: 40
          0
          The main transshipment point is located in the Kremlin ... the bill goes already to trillions ... open your eyes ... holy Putin's naivete
          1. Peter Ivanov
            Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 20: 53
            +1
            Absolutely fair!
    2. vitvit123
      vitvit123 10 January 2019 21: 27
      +1

      --------------- and I am pleased with such statements of Lukashenka, which means that he is dissatisfied, and dissatisfied with the fact that the freebie has ended, which means that despite the New Year's Eve meetings, it was not possible to "dissolve" Putin .. .-----------------------

      Exactly !!!
  22. Kawado
    Kawado 10 January 2019 16: 43
    0
    Lukashenko said that the issue of combining the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation today is not worth it

    Well the man celebrated, if after the holidays already and "not worth it."
    At the end of last year, he himself was running, with a question (under the very chin)!
    All? fuse passed? Now everyone can relax?)))
    P.S. But in general, I am always for the unification of a single Russian people.
  23. The comment was deleted.
    1. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 10 January 2019 17: 43
      +1
      Mendel ... Shelomov ... and then a long list ..this is Zionism
  24. Astra wild
    Astra wild 10 January 2019 17: 18
    +2
    I have always treated Lukashenka with respect and until recently was in charge of the Belarusians. My husbands colleagues called me “desperate commissarsha”: she always said that Belarusians should pray to Lukashenka, that they live in paradise. In the spring I went there and was disappointed: he says one thing, does another, and in total "it's good where we are not." I really hoped that no one was hunting for the "green" when we were studying to "green" were indifferent: everything compared to today was worth a penny. They did not want to go abroad. And there, as with us: currency is held in high esteem, prices are also growing, and I argued that they must have a decrease in prices, speculation.
    I have the opinion that Lukashenko himself does not want a complete unification, apparently - he has a duality in nature or he already has poor control over the situation in the country. I would like to hope that Lukashenko is simply afraid of his surroundings and therefore dupers.
  25. lexa333
    lexa333 10 January 2019 19: 21
    +1
    It is a pity Belarus will receive the same as we.
    1. Peter Ivanov
      Peter Ivanov 10 January 2019 20: 55
      +1
      If Belarusians surrender to Putin's capitalists!
  26. Mentat
    Mentat 10 January 2019 19: 52
    0
    If countries do not agree on compensation, Lukashenka added, then Russia "may lose an ally."

    Dear Alexander Grigoryevich, do not go too far.
  27. demos1111
    demos1111 11 January 2019 07: 08
    0
    It is only Russia that can grow an anti-Russian regime with its own money.
    They are planting your journalists, you have been silent for two years now, as you are oppressing a parade with portraits of veterans and with a St. George ribbon, you are silent.
    Here in the VO, there were posts at the expense of the Germans, who allowed an attack on their women Arabs (such as deflated).
    But what about Russia, which always comes for its money, like Russians who always come together like droplets of mercury. Apparently, Russia began to fade. Yes there were people in our time ...
  28. Sergej1972
    Sergej1972 11 January 2019 11: 10
    0
    By and large, the compromise on the part of the Russian Federation would not be the inclusion of Belarus in the Russian Federation, but the giving of real substance to the Union State. But one must understand that in his leadership, representatives of the Russian Federation will still prevail unconditionally. And, most likely, most of the top posts will be combined with the corresponding posts in the Russian Federation.
  29. koshmarik
    koshmarik 11 January 2019 11: 33
    +1
    The father of a politician, unlike Putin, is not of a strategic but of a tactical level; for him, the main thing is to grab something, to trifle through the little things, to throw a partner for another million well, etc. For him, strategic thinking is not available by definition. This is his misfortune. I think that he himself is not happy about this, but he simply cannot be different.
    1. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 11 January 2019 17: 32
      0
      compare 20 years of Stalin ... and 20 years of Putin ... and then honestly tell yourself where the strategist and the statesman ... without emotion. only in terms of numbers ... and facts, without Solzhenitsyn and Khrushchev
  30. Sergei75
    Sergei75 11 January 2019 20: 54
    0
    At half past five a question.