Published footage from the site of the explosion of the support of the railway bridge in the DPR

January 2 2019 80

From the Donetsk People's Republic today reports about the implementation of a sabotage and terrorist act come. It is noted that unknown persons carried out undermining the support of the railway bridge. We are talking about the object of railway infrastructure, which is located on the 27-m kilometer of the route between the stations Chumakovo and Larino. The bridge passes over the road connecting Slavyansk with Mariupol.

Published footage from the site of the explosion of the support of the railway bridge in the DPR

To prevent the destruction of the bridge, which could occur as a result of the partial destruction of its central support, experts carried out work on installing special concrete glasses and laying more than a hundred sleepers in the space between the supports.

It is known that the explosion occurred the day before.

Republican Ministry of Emergency Situations reports that there are no victims as a result of the explosion.

Published a video from which you can see that one of the pillars of the central support has suffered, as well as the base of the support pair. Rebar is strongly bent. The power of an explosive device driven by unknowns was up to 100 g in TNT equivalent.

The operational headquarters of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the DPR was formed on the site. Assistance is provided including by Russian specialists.

Recall that in the Donbass with 29 December 2018, the regime of the so-called New Year (Christmas) truce. The number of attacks on the territory of the LDNR has decreased, however, shelling from the Ukrainian side does manifest itself. This is recorded by the specialists of the Joint Center for Monitoring the Situation in the Region.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

GKS 2111

+18

2 January 2019 16: 17

Well, itching to do everything Bandera ... "The regime of the so-called New Year (Christmas) truce is in effect." Is it true that the so-called .. And, yes, 100 grams ...? Well, I don’t know .. Somehow it doesn’t look like 100 grams. ...
1. Finches
  
  +11
  
  2 January 2019 16: 25
  
  The DRG does not act on the entire depth of the DPR, already plus counterintelligence, and in the territories of the republics adjacent to the gray zones it is rather difficult to track the penetration of saboteurs. As soon as advisers from SAS drew in Ukraine, in a month - sabotage! You can safely recall May Beginner ...
  1. Boa kaa
    
    +14
    
    2 January 2019 17: 21
    
    Quote: Finches
    It is difficult to track the penetration of saboteurs.
    
    Strategic objects such as a bridge, oil storage, water intake points, etc. must be protected on a permanent basis! Guardians, with a thorn, towers and everything put on the staffing table for such objects! Otherwise, you will be tortured to repair the support. It's good that there were no casualties and train crashes! It would be a "merry" Christmas!
    In short, the safety of railway bridges has failed. Here is the result.
    1. Finches
      
      +3
      
      2 January 2019 17: 24
      
      It should, but where to get the strength and resources?
      1. Shurik70
        
        +11
        
        2 January 2019 18: 42
        
        Quote: GKS 2111
        100 grams ...? Well, I don’t know .. It’s somehow not like 100 grams ..
        
        Yeah. I saw what happens to the concrete block if F1 (60 g of TNT) is blown up on it. NIFIGA block does not happen.
        There every 10-20 more TNT was.
        
        MKPU-115
        
        +1
        
        3 January 2019 12: 07
        
        Quote: Shurik70
        Quote: GKS 2111
        100 grams ...? Well, I don’t know .. It’s somehow not like 100 grams ..
        
        Yeah. I saw what happens to the concrete block if F1 (60 g of TNT) is blown up on it. NIFIGA block does not happen.
        There every 10-20 more TNT was.
        
        There are two TNT blocks of 400 grams on opposite sides with an offset relative to each other, rigidly bolted to a support wire and between them a detonation cord (scissors diagram).
        If there were more, the support would be cut off along with the fittings.
      2. igorka357
        
        +2
        
        3 January 2019 05: 25
        
        Two or three submachine gunners, and a pair of motion sensors, is not such an expensive pleasure, especially submachine gunners, for a warring republic!
      3. Slavs
        
        +1
        
        3 January 2019 14: 23
        
        Well, if beauty contests do not suit, then maybe there are resources? At the border, too, every meter a fighter is not standing ...
  2. tol100v
    
    +1
    
    2 January 2019 18: 08
    
    Quote: Finches
    
    
    Quote: Finches
    You can safely recall May Beginner.
    
    And why boldly? And who is May?
    1. Finches
      
      0
      
      2 January 2019 18: 25
      
      I do not know...!
    2. Peresvet_54
      
      +7
      
      2 January 2019 18: 46
      
      "May" is an old English, but little-known mongrel. Breshet both left and right ...
  3. Normal ok
    
    +1
    
    2 January 2019 20: 42
    
    Quote: Finches
    The DRG does not act on the entire depth of the DPR, already plus counterintelligence, and in the territories of the republics adjacent to the gray zones it is rather difficult to track the penetration of saboteurs. As soon as advisers from SAS drew in Ukraine, in a month - sabotage! You can safely recall May Beginner ...
    
    Guy. I personally know the old Soviet officers (who live in Ukraine) who would do the same in 3X times more efficiently. all this nonsense and PR
    1. Finches
      
      0
      
      2 January 2019 20: 44
      
      Or maybe it wasn’t necessary ...
  4. Normal ok
    
    +1
    
    2 January 2019 22: 13
    
    Quote: Finches
    DRG does not apply to the entire depth of the DNI,
    
    of these guys I personally know a third. they didn’t do this)) but in general 5-7 kg of plastid, + detonation cord (if you remember, the little red one, in a rag braid)
2. ancestors from Don
  
  +7
  
  2 January 2019 17: 01
  
  Why not an eye for an eye? Sudoplatov would have made alaverdi "like in a Pharmacy."
  1. igorka357
    
    -1
    
    3 January 2019 05: 28
    
    Pavel Sudoplatov, of course, is a professional in his field and has done a lot for the country, but he was not an ordinary person! Most historians agree that he was a very cruel and vengeful person and in his personal life, although he showed his professional qualities perfectly!
3. Ekaterina Shtepa
  
  +8
  
  2 January 2019 17: 24
  
  I’m not an explosive engineer, but I’m clearly not pulling at 100 g - it looks like 5-10 kg! ...
  1. igorka357
    
    +1
    
    3 January 2019 05: 30
    
    10 kg of TNT would blow such a support into dust, about 3-5 kg most likely!
4. Alex Nevs
  
  +2
  
  2 January 2019 20: 29
  
  a lump of 10 kilograms or a scattering of about 5
5. major147
  
  +3
  
  2 January 2019 23: 28
  
  Quote: GKS 2111
  Somehow it’s not like 100 grams ..
  
  Apparently zero somewhere lost.
poquello

+9

2 January 2019 16: 19

This is a pure terrorist attack, financed by dill, if not done by them, but then the British turned on the sick-headed Abdul, "ah, he Alah-Akbar shouted."
igm001

+6

2 January 2019 16: 21

From 100 grams such damage? !! Someone mixed up something.
1. Doliva63
  
  +4
  
  2 January 2019 16: 29
  
  Quote: igm001
  From 100 grams such damage? !! Someone mixed up something.
  
  I also thought: either concrete is shit, or there were more explosives. But clearly not the experts worked, they would calculate the charge correctly.
  Although, I remember, they trained somehow on Hitler's bunkers, so the estimated number of explosives could not cope.
  1. Ekaterina Shtepa
    
    +8
    
    2 January 2019 17: 26
    
    In the past, bridge builders did not indulge with concrete - they laid concrete of the design grade and did not indulge with a lack of cement!
    1. Alex Nevs
      
      +3
      
      2 January 2019 20: 31
      
      judging by the reinforcement and crushed concrete, the structure was quite strong
      1. Ekaterina Shtepa
        
        0
        
        3 January 2019 09: 48
        
        The fittings will withstand not such loads - look at the tensile strength of steel (St3)! But for concrete - hmm, so crush it! ... Maybe they wrapped the rack in bags? I can’t say, I’m not an explosion engineer.
2. Ross xnumx
  
  +5
  
  2 January 2019 17: 23
  
  Quote: igm001
  From 100 grams such damage? !! Someone mixed up something.
  
  When we trained in undermining, the instructor told us that even a small charge in a limited (closed) space can cause significant damage. Cover with a frying pan on top and tighten with a cable or iron clamp and ... Steel helmet (helmet), if put on the most ordinary explosion package flies 10 meters or more (how to tamp) ...
  So it’s quite possible. No need to argue with specialists. It remains only to say once again that these geeks-fuses will calm down only in the coffin. They will not allow normal people to live - such is the nature of parasites and villains. I feel sorry for the people (residents of the DPR) that they have to live on this powder keg and there is no end in sight.
3. Captain Pushkin
  
  +5
  
  2 January 2019 17: 31
  
  Quote: igm001
  From 100 grams such damage? !! Someone mixed up something.
  
  Tolka piece 100 gr maximum that can interrupt the rail, with the correct bookmark.
4. Boa kaa
  
  +4
  
  2 January 2019 17: 39
  
  Quote: igm001
  From 100 grams such damage? !!
  
  Either they forgot to add a zero, or it was not TNT (ammonal), but at least C-4 or some other thread of the TSA / MS-2 / H6 ...
  1. Captain Pushkin
    
    +2
    
    2 January 2019 22: 09
    
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: igm001
    From 100 grams such damage? !!
    
    Either they forgot to add a zero, or it was not TNT (ammonal), but at least C-4 or some other thread of the TSA / MS-2 / H6 ...
    
    Rather, the units of measurement are confused, instead of grams, the db kilograms. If you laid boobies, then a good support and a hundred kg could not break.
    Father said that under the first bridge support, which he blew up in the Second World War, he laid 32 kg.
Mouse

+4

2 January 2019 16: 22

until they get on the hill, they’ll calm down ....
Lamatinets

+5

2 January 2019 16: 24

For 100 grams, it’s a bit too much, like a strong, adult peasant pulled a sotochka and got into a sober, insane.
svp67

+5

2 January 2019 16: 25

Today, reports on the implementation of a sabotage and terrorist act come from the Donetsk People’s Republic
Yeah ... it’s bad that saboteurs from Ukraine are allowed to go around like that, even worse that bridge explosions have gone, this is one of the signs of an aggravation of the situation at the forefront.
But here is a blast ????? What did the explosives not report here, that is, they stole it or stole something during the production? Or in vain do we sin on a new education? There is also benefit, here saboteurs could not calculate the required amount of explosives ...
1. novobranets
  
  +2
  
  2 January 2019 16: 33
  
  Quote: svp67
  Here saboteurs could not calculate the right amount of explosives ...
  
  In my opinion, enough would be enough. The location of the charge is incorrect.
  1. svp67
    
    +7
    
    2 January 2019 16: 35
    
    Quote: novobranets
    The location of the charge is incorrect.
    
    Or maybe the Soviet quality of the support was not taken into account?
    1. novobranets
      
      +4
      
      2 January 2019 16: 37
      
      Quote: svp67
      did you not take into account the Soviet quality of the support?
      
      May be. Reinforcement is competent, according to all the rules.
      1. svp67
        
        +3
        
        2 January 2019 16: 38
        
        Quote: novobranets
        May be. Reinforcement is competent, according to all the rules.
        
        Once again I am convinced of the benefits of what we have here, count in the deepest rear, and all the bridges have been taken under protection.
      2. Glory Ponomarev
        
        +3
        
        2 January 2019 18: 14
        
        Not everything is easier, there is a second support side by side, it is absolutely whole. It's just that they took a picture so that it is not visible, probably the photographer is inexperienced.
        
        Ekaterina Shtepa
        
        0
        
        3 January 2019 09: 50
        
        For me, too, the question is - why did they leave the second rack ???
Terenin

+3

2 January 2019 16: 29

The diversion in its purest form, and even it is not difficult to guess who did it. Just what the caches with explosives discovered by the DPR authorities showed, and for some reason this did not serve as a signal for the protection of life support facilities (including strategic bridges).
1. Glory Ponomarev
  
  0
  
  2 January 2019 18: 00
  
  Or maybe it’s easier. I drove on a kamaz under a degree and didn’t fit into the turn and got stuck in the support. Look at the video there, two supports are not touched at all.
aristok

+1

2 January 2019 16: 34

Here are the consequences of cowardice and stupidity (or sabotage) of the mundialissimo (more precisely, its masters) disguised as a multi-way cunning plan
dgonni

+3

2 January 2019 16: 45

100 grams of TNT? Is the author joking? There are at least a dozen TNT. For an experiment, let the author hit his head against a brick wall from all overclocking. Here is the same effect from a hundred-gram TNT block fixed on a concrete support!
1. Lamatinets
  
  0
  
  2 January 2019 17: 14
  
  And if the weakening of the paratroopers hits the take-off run, what effect do you predict?
  1. dgonni
    
    0
    
    2 January 2019 19: 47
    
    Anniversary! There is a well-laid charge! The jumper has also been hit hard. A dozen minimum but I wang 25 right ramps!
    1. Alex Nevs
      
      +1
      
      2 January 2019 20: 34
      
      it seems just quickly put on a jumper right up to the rack
Berkut24

+2

2 January 2019 17: 18

I am not calling for anything, but a conversation with Bandera is possible only at the tit-for-tat level. After the murder of Givi and Motorola, 2 corpses of the commanders of the Ukrainian battalions, or Western instructors, were to swim along the Northern Donets. And it turns out that the Zapadensk terrorists have nothing to fear - they calmly walk around Kiev with brand new medals.
1. Ekaterina Shtepa
  
  +2
  
  2 January 2019 17: 29
  
  Wait more! ...
2. dgonni
  
  +1
  
  2 January 2019 19: 48
  
  Ask Donetsk and Who soaked Givi and Motorola? The answer you really do not satisfy!
  1. phakic
    
    +1
    
    2 January 2019 19: 53
    
    Reveal the secret)))
3. Stalevar79
  
  -1
  
  2 January 2019 20: 34
  
  After the murder of Givi and Motorola, 2 corpses of the commanders of Ukrainian battalions, or Western instructors, were supposed to swim along the North Donets.
  
  If you believe my friends from Novorossia, after the murder of Givi and Motorola, 2 corpses of Wagner PMC commanders, or, even worse, our MTR officers, should have sailed along the Barada River flowing through Damascus.
  1. pv1005
    
    -1
    
    2 January 2019 21: 22
    
    Quote: Stalevar79
    If you believe my friends from Novorossia, after the murder of Givi and Motorola, 2 corpses of Wagner PMC commanders, or, even worse, our MTR officers, should have sailed along the Barada River flowing through Damascus.
    
    You and your friends will decide who was supposed to sail PMCs or MTRs. 3.14dazbol find for the enemy.
phakic

+4

2 January 2019 17: 22

BB was clearly more than a kilogram. This morning, the bypass at the blast site was blocked.
petrol cutter

+1

2 January 2019 17: 33

The fighters relaxed, however. And we got a "tractor". What else can you say?
What time is it ?! Time is right now ...
Shield as in WWII. Bridges, crossings, crossings, highways are all defense objects of strategic (minimum tactical) significance ... And here it is on you ... Well, how so ?! The bridge was demolished ....
Although our fellows. They took the dock and drowned it! .. I personally would take the "revolver" and shoot myself (if I were the head of the dock).
Hiller

0

2 January 2019 17: 45

Bad security of strategic facilities. Or in any way?
1. petrol cutter
  
  0
  
  2 January 2019 17: 57
  
  Yes bad. What a sin to conceal. And any diversionary actions not training confirm this. Everything is good on paper only. But in fact ...
  In fact, bad.
2. Hiller
  
  -1
  
  2 January 2019 18: 01
  
  What are we minus? I do not like? True eyes prick?
Glory Ponomarev

+4

2 January 2019 17: 55

Is this bridge operational at all? Is it a sabotage at all? The video shows that there are two supports and only one is damaged. Even the most distant saboteur will understand that two must be blown up at once. Certain suspicions creep in. Maybe someone on the Kamaz truck is drunk into this support drove in, and here they give it out for another sabotage, mystical DRGs.
1. Semurg
  
  +1
  
  2 January 2019 18: 26
  
  From the pictures it seems the car crashed into a support.
2. phakic
  
  0
  
  2 January 2019 20: 40
  
  And according to the deformation of the reinforcement, it is not clear that the blow was not only in the support itself, but also in the foundation block ??? Maybe before you write something, you should carefully consider the photo ??? Well, read on the topic of undermining reinforced concrete structures ??? Like children damn ...
loginovich

-1

2 January 2019 18: 31

Who said Ukrainians blew up?
1. Antares
  
  +5
  
  2 January 2019 19: 52
  
  Quote: loginovich
  Who said Ukrainians blew up?
  
  Ukrainians or the State Department, there are no other versions. not liberals ..
  a strange "terrorist attack", as in the joke straight.
  1 support and in this way ...
  can distract?
Alexander X

-1

2 January 2019 18: 39

Shoot terrorists on the spot .... Creatures ... Already not even against military sabotage, but the infrastructure of civilian facilities is being destroyed ...
1. Alexander X
  
  0
  
  3 January 2019 11: 06
  
  I noticed that two put cons for calling for the execution of terrorists. Does this mean that terrorists or sympathizers have flocked to our site? Well, it’s just amazing how much a human person can degrade ... IMHO ...
av58

-2

2 January 2019 18: 47

Maybe it's time to blow up a couple of bridges in Kiev? Say, a railway bridge across the Dnieper?
1. Glory Ponomarev
  
  +1
  
  3 January 2019 01: 57
  
  Calls for terrorism, do you have all the rules?
  1. av58
    
    -1
    
    3 January 2019 15: 43
    
    Treat yours, but for normal people - "a la guerre comme à la guerre".
Radical

0

2 January 2019 19: 35

Quote: Catherine Shtepa
I’m not an explosive engineer, but I’m clearly not pulling at 100 g - it looks like 5-10 kg! ...

From 10 kg the bridge would collapse.
1. dgonni
  
  +2
  
  2 January 2019 19: 44
  
  You are too far from the issue under consideration, however, like your sofa!
Radical

0

2 January 2019 19: 46

Quote: dgonni
You are too far from the issue under consideration, however, like your sofa!

With arguments, you are not so hot, however, here many have not so much with them ....
23424636

+1

2 January 2019 20: 11

bridges should be guarded and not clicked, so in Razdolny bridge in 15 they also blew up but the supports seemed to withstand although the wire hung and the base was jerked and then fixed and flooded with concrete we now roll as if there was nothing. In Ukraine, all bridges are supposedly guarded, but just 5 Russian pieces a month for 3 snouts are a pity to give. Here and tear. Toad and clowns are the motto of the current Donbass
Avior

+3

2 January 2019 20: 39

It seems that 100 grams of explosives looked like a drunk at the wheel of an armored personnel carrier, but someone really did not want to admit that not only in the Armed Forces were thumping.
Decimam

+2

2 January 2019 20: 40
"The power of the explosive device, set in motion by unknown persons, was up to 100 g in TNT equivalent."
Anyone who has at least minimal explosive preparation even in the scope of Varenyshev’s instruction understands that from a 100 g of TNT in the form of an overhead charge, only a spot would remain on such a support. On the eye, based on the size of the support, in order to knock out concrete, it is necessary to lay a kilogram of 8. This is not a one-minute deal, even if you use ready-made extended charges. If it was so easy to lay the first charge, who prevented the second from interrupting the fittings? Somehow everything is not very believable.
1. Vadim237
  
  -1
  
  2 January 2019 21: 15
  
  Maybe all the same 10 kilograms.
  1. Decimam
    
    +1
    
    2 January 2019 21: 32
    
    In order to calculate accurately, the exact dimensions of the support are needed. I took approximately a cross section of 1000 x 500 mm.
2. Doliva63
  
  0
  
  3 January 2019 18: 26
  
  Quote: Decimam
  
  "The power of the explosive device, set in motion by unknown persons, was up to 100 g in TNT equivalent."
  Anyone who has at least minimal explosive preparation even in the scope of Varenyshev’s instruction understands that from a 100 g of TNT in the form of an overhead charge, only a spot would remain on such a support. On the eye, based on the size of the support, in order to knock out concrete, it is necessary to lay a kilogram of 8. This is not a one-minute deal, even if you use ready-made extended charges. If it was so easy to lay the first charge, who prevented the second from interrupting the fittings? Somehow everything is not very believable.
  
  Regular concentrated charges, from memory, about 15 kg. with various mounting options. Two such charges are put in time as one. Reinforcement together with concrete would be killed easily. I did not understand about extended charges.
  1. Decimam
    
    +1
    
    3 January 2019 18: 59
    
    SZ-4P, for example, never met?
    1. Doliva63
      
      0
      
      6 January 2019 19: 58
      
      Quote: Decimam
      SZ-4P, for example, never met?
      
      Maybe I met, but I left the army in 91, I don’t remember.
      1. Decimam
        
        +1
        
        6 January 2019 20: 04
        
        And I'm in 1984, but I remember.
Grits

+3

3 January 2019 02: 21

When I read the caption to the video "The Ministry of Emergency Situations have completed the work", I was filled with laughter. Of all the work that the Ministry of Emergency Situations can perform (except for firefighters) is to write a report / report to higher authorities and declare on a video camera for the press what forces and means they used. If someone still believes in the omnipotence of the Emergencies Ministry, then let them try to answer me how they restored the bridge supports. Despite the fact that the Ministry of Emergency Situations does not have the appropriate engineering technology, equipment and construction engineers and other specialists. The Ministry of Emergency Situations, as always, just promoted for the press, and simple robots worked with engineers from enterprises and local institutions, led by local authorities.