Military Review

Belarusian Air Force will be replenished with the Yak-130 Four and the Su-30CM link

41
Next year, the Air Force of Belarus plans to strengthen four more Yak-130 combat training aircraft and get the first link of the super-maneuverable Su-30CM fighter jets. This was stated in interview RIA News Minister of Defense of the Republic of Belarus Andrei Rawkov.


Belarusian Air Force will be replenished with the Yak-130 Four and the Su-30CM link


According to the head of the defense department of Belarus, the Yak-130 combat training aircraft will go to the Air Force of the Republic, presumably in March of the next year. According to the contract with the Russian corporation "Irkut", this will be the delivery of already the third four of these aircraft to the armed forces of Belarus. In addition, another contract was concluded, but already for the delivery to the RB Air Force Su-30CM, according to which in 2019 Belarusian pilots will receive the first link of super-maneuverable fighters.

Thus, Ravkov emphasized, with the receipt of a new batch of Yak-130, the total number of these combat training aircraft in the Air Force of the Republic will reach 12. As for the Su-30SM, the plans of the Ministry of Defense of Belarus, to buy in Russia before 2020, the squadron of fighters, which will increase the capabilities of the Belarusian army to protect troops and facilities from air strikes, as well as significantly update the fleet of aircraft.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
41 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. grau
    grau 25 December 2018 13: 01
    +1
    And enough money for maintenance
    1. Legend
      Legend 25 December 2018 18: 25
      +1
      Quote: grau
      And enough money for maintenance

      Enough, for Belarus nothing is sorry! Old Man understands everything in the current political situation .. There they have good airfields since the days of the USSR (right on the roads, etc.) Well done, brothers! soldier good
  2. seti
    seti 25 December 2018 13: 02
    +9
    I hope that we will not deliver all this to them for free. Listened to the brotherhood and partnership, the ears do not stand.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 25 December 2018 13: 11
      +10
      Quote: seti

      I hope that we will not deliver all this to them for free.

      Of course not, Lukashenko will pay in cash ........ from the budget of Russialaughing
      1. Legend
        Legend 25 December 2018 18: 28
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: seti

        I hope that we will not deliver all this to them for free.

        Of course not, Lukashenko will pay in cash ........ from the budget of Russialaughing

        Greetings nihilist Far Eastern Sanya !!! Old Cortokha will pay for everything, am I right? laughing
    2. kapitan92
      kapitan92 25 December 2018 13: 17
      +11
      Quote: seti
      I hope that we will not deliver all this to them for free. Listened to the brotherhood and partnership, the ears do not stand.

      The deal was concluded directly with the Irkut corporation without the participation of the state intermediary.
      The cost of 12 Su-30SM for Belarus is about $ 600 million. Russian loans will be used to supply the aircraft, the delivery rate will not be too high so as not to create an unnecessary burden on the budget - about four cars a year.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 25 December 2018 13: 20
        0
        Quote: kapitan92
        Russian loans

        Новогодний подарок
        1. kapitan92
          kapitan92 25 December 2018 13: 26
          +7
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Новогодний подарок

          EMNIP supply contract was concluded in 2015.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 25 December 2018 13: 38
            0
            Quote: kapitan92
            EMNIP supply contract was concluded in 2015.

            Who cares when the question is at whose expense the banquet
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 25 December 2018 13: 19
      +1
      Quote: seti
      I hope that we will not deliver all this to them for free.

      It seems to be buying.
      in the plans of the Ministry of Defense of Belarus, to purchase in Russia until 2020, a fighter squadron,

      But it can also be "for a share", for a third of the price. request
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 25 December 2018 13: 29
        +4
        Quote: Piramidon
        But it can also be "for a share", for a third of the price.

        The captain named the amount and conditions above. 50 megabytes per drying. Compared with the purchase price of eurofighter for Austria (129 megaevro per breeze), a third of the price is hi
        1. alexmach
          alexmach 25 December 2018 16: 33
          -1
          Well, actually, Belarusians buy them at domestic prices, which is logical. Although they are no longer brothers but just partners.
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 25 December 2018 16: 44
            +1
            Quote: alexmach
            Though they are no longer brothers

            Syabry and Bulbashki. I have no other complaints. Bulbashki's all mine
          2. Piramidon
            Piramidon 25 December 2018 17: 15
            0
            Quote: alexmach
            Well, actually, Belarusians buy them at domestic prices, which is logical. Although they are no longer brothers but just partners.

            Do you want to say that the prices for all Russian equipment are the same for the RF Ministry of Defense and the RB Ministry of Defense? I would like details, as in the song - "where is what fish and for what?" hi
    4. donavi49
      donavi49 25 December 2018 13: 44
      +4
      Well, in Laos, there are also supplies of Anchors on a credit line. The first under the tree through Vietnam left.
  3. Wolf
    Wolf 25 December 2018 13: 19
    -5
    I don’t understand NATO trolls or what? Does someone give your dengue to Belarus? Do not forget that during WWII Belarusians lost 30% of the POPULATION !!! not an army. Vee bi and for the money admitted that bi eto repeated? Glorious Vi or Jews?
    1. grau
      grau 25 December 2018 13: 21
      +4
      Then there was no Belarus and there were Russian people
      1. Wolf
        Wolf 25 December 2018 13: 38
        +1
        Even now they were beating Russi, I am not talking about politicians about the people. Ukraine has the same Russi. Cheime feeds you there in the media? Hate your people? If something happens, Porosenko and his criminal squad will run away like rats and people will suffer. A normal person can just congratulate the modernization of the Belarusian army in this very dangerous time, and if you need help with money you need to and without questions!
        1. grau
          grau 25 December 2018 13: 43
          +3
          For whose brush, upgrade. The social state, yeah, take loans from the capitalist state a.
        2. DenZ
          DenZ 25 December 2018 13: 56
          +3
          Quote: Wolf
          If something happens Porosenko and his criminal squad will run away like rats and people will suffer

          Do not write nonsense, we are not so stupid as not to distinguish politics from the moods of ordinary people. No ordinary people (not supporting the Poroshenko junta) are going to offend. Relatives in Ukraine live in half of Russia, and Ukrainians work fully in Russia. Only now it seems to you that we hate them fiercely. Calm down already and do not write nonsense.
      2. Wolf
        Wolf 25 December 2018 13: 53
        +2
        In addition to this, why don’t you ask your "historian" how Ukrainians and Belarus came about Rusov Ivan Velikog (Groznog). Someone and for what divided the PEOPLE into a nation !!!
      3. Piramidon
        Piramidon 25 December 2018 14: 17
        +2
        Quote: grau
        Then there was no Belarus and there were Russian people

        More precisely, Soviet.
    2. DenZ
      DenZ 25 December 2018 13: 28
      +2
      Well, actually, the state budget of Russia is our money (Russians). Where you are not completely clear. But I share your dissatisfaction in part. In / in Ukraine, too, many people lost during the Second World War, so what? Does this prevent them from equating the UPA with the war veterans? (what they did just yesterday or today). I certainly exaggerate, because in Belarus, this is not there, but still. Old Man as soon as hints that they say, tobacco apart and we want to be extreme?
      1. Wolf
        Wolf 25 December 2018 13: 41
        +1
        Ето прировнянье УПА зделали продажни политики Поросенко ( Вальцман) , Коломейски Исраелитанин, нацики в Льавове итд. Не Украински народ ! ;)
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 25 December 2018 14: 20
      +5
      Quote: Wolf
      I don’t understand NATO trolls or what? Does someone give your dengue to Belarus? Do not forget that during WWII Belarusians lost 30% of the POPULATION !!! not an army. Vee bi and for the money admitted that bi eto repeated? Glorious Vi or Jews?

      Everything flows, everything changes. Bulgaria, too, was once considered a friendly and fraternal state. Well, where is your Bulgaria today?
  4. LSA57
    LSA57 25 December 2018 13: 21
    +3
    Ooh belay
    like minus And in the comments rained down. just like snow on New Year's Eve.
    but for some reason the minus signer did not leave his own and did not argue the cons.
    guerrilla laughing
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 25 December 2018 13: 41
      +9
      Quote: LSA57
      like minus And in the comments rained down. just like snow on New Year's Eve.

      Dissatisfied brothers from "independent" Belarus, very annoyed that we support their dependence on Russia in our comments
      1. DenZ
        DenZ 25 December 2018 14: 02
        +4
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Dissatisfied brothers from "independent" Belarus, very annoyed that we support their dependence on Russia in our comments

        Yes, there’s nothing to support either. All by itself. Let if they can themselves produce military equipment. We ascertain the facts, and they are such that Belarus needs military support, but there is no one to implement it besides us.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 25 December 2018 14: 03
          +2
          Quote: DenZ
          We ascertain the facts, and they are such that Belarus needs military support, but there is no one to implement it besides us

          In other words, Russia is the guarantor of the independence of Belarus wassat
    2. Setrac
      Setrac 25 December 2018 14: 19
      +2
      Quote: LSA57
      like minus And in the comments rained down. just like snow on New Year's Eve.
      but for some reason the minus signer did not leave his own and did not argue the cons.
      guerrilla

      Anonymity is evil, the administration must make it clear who voted.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 25 December 2018 17: 09
        +1
        Quote: Setrac
        Anonymity is evil, the administration must make it clear who voted.

        I asked this question to admins. I was told that they do not want any showdown here, such as "blood feud". I suggested organizing at least the blocking of "minuses" without preliminary comments with objections (objected - then minus). But the admins did not receive a response. If everyone who agrees with me directs site administration their suggestions (and will not be limited only by comments and interlovers), which may burn out. hi
        1. Setrac
          Setrac 26 December 2018 14: 29
          +1
          Quote: Piramidon
          I asked this question to admins. I was told that they do not want any showdown here, such as "blood feud".

          Why then did you come up with pros and cons? There is a "complaint" button for violators.
  5. prosto_rgb
    prosto_rgb 25 December 2018 13: 28
    +2
    You can plan and Tu-22M3M.
    Soon we will see the result of today's negotiations.
  6. Hypersound
    Hypersound 25 December 2018 13: 45
    -1
    I hope not for free.

    Other than that, I have a question. Why do we need a Su-27 and Su-30 when there is a Su-35?
    1. IL-18
      IL-18 25 December 2018 19: 23
      0
      And money? Compare prices. It is clear that there are many nuances, what is inside, and what and how, but in open sources at least for -30cm from $ 30mn, and -35s from $ 45mln.
  7. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 25 December 2018 14: 01
    0
    Aren't "link" and "four" the same thing?
  8. faiver
    faiver 25 December 2018 14: 08
    +4
    it’s funny to read comments like “I hope not for free”, like not an Israeli site, but greediness and rushing, and nothing that the country's own leadership rips off the population and “not oligarchs” drink blood in order to buy another yacht the size of a destroyer, but Belarusians have planes only at market prices ... ugh ...
  9. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 25 December 2018 14: 47
    +2
    That is correct.
  10. Conductor
    Conductor 25 December 2018 15: 10
    -4
    Gave it again !!!!
  11. The comment was deleted.
    1. Communist for the truth
      Communist for the truth 25 December 2018 18: 46
      +4
      A thousand pluses to you, dear. People scotch under Western propaganda, look at the refrigerator more, look at their thick belly .... they forget where we all come from and WHAT we lived soldier
  12. suhov17
    suhov17 26 December 2018 11: 40
    -1

    I hope that we will not deliver all this to them for free. Listened to the brotherhood and partnership, the ears do not stand.

    If you had brains, then you would listen to Old Man and not the Kremlin Belarusian community, where all the words are taken out of context and mixed up like in a vinaigrette.
    Of course not, Lukashenko will pay in cash ........ from the Russian budget
    Reply

    When pronouncing words, Belarus and a freebie, give at least one example, and then the words, Ivan and the whole world, have long been known.