Debunking the myths of Rezun

Today, many "truthful researchers" are trying to rewrite history, stubbornly convincing Russian society that Stalin played the most direct role in unleashing World War II.

This interpretation is traced in the book of the Soviet intelligence officer V. Rezun “Day M”. Recall that V. Rezun, who once worked under the pseudonym "Viktor Suvorov", fled to the UK in 1978 year. In the USSR, he was sentenced in absentia to death.

In the book "Day M", which has become a bestseller in a short period, the author presents his version of the beginning of the Second World War. In particular, he says that the Soviet leadership, led by Stalin, was preparing for a new world war and the spread of communist ideology throughout the world. In the book Rezun displays the exact exact start date of the war - 6 July 1941 of the year. This date was planned by Stalin almost two years before the well-known events. Hitler just beat Stalin by two weeks and struck him with a preemptive strike. According to the author, from the side of Hitler, the attack on the USSR was an extremely necessary measure.

The authors of the video convincingly debunk the myths presented in the book "Day M", and provide an answer to the question: "Who actually started World War II?"

Another reel by the same author debunks the myths of Rezun that the appearance of Russian-German phrasebooks shortly before the war allegedly proves the fact that the USSR was preparing for war. An expert opinion is given on the fact that, firstly, the Germans released a German-Russian phrasebook before the Soviet Union, and secondly, Russian-English phrasebooks were issued in Moscow, which does not mean that the USSR was prepared for the war against England.

Comments

[Well, how else]

Interesting ... All the proof of the rezun's wrong came down to some kind of phrasebooks. "Load oranges in barrels." O. Bender.

[Moore]

Quote: Well, how else

Interesting ... All the proof of the rezun's wrong came down to some kind of phrasebooks. "Load oranges in barrels." O. Bender

We read Isaev's Antisuvorov. There are more than enough arguments to close the topic.

Quote: nina1961vk

And the fact that the main forces were located on the western borders and the USSR intensified the release of fighters, the fighter was a purely offensive vehicle, their range is not far from this airfields were very close to the borders for what? Give a million, O. Bender.

It's five. Could you tell me who the fighters should "attack"? Probably for bombers, a purely defensive weapon? The very ones that paved the way for the ground forces? By the way, it was not Bender - Panikovsky who demanded a million.

[vladimirZ]

The author claims that I.V. Stalin never flew airplanes, even to Iran at the Tehran Conference.
This is not true. Indeed, he and the delegation traveled to Baku by train, and then to Tehran by plane, and vice versa. Those. At least twice, Stalin flew on an airplane.
This is confirmed, for example, by two participants in this flight in their memoirs: Chief Marshal of Aviation Golovanov A.E. "Distant bomber ..." and General of the Army Shtemenko S.M. "General Staff during the War".
I was also surprised by the author's passage regarding Stalin's "cooling" towards A.E. Golovanov. because of the unsuccessful bombing of Helsinki, and the transfer of DD Aviation to the Air Force because of this.

[vladimirZ]

Concerning the traitorous writer Rezun, it is striking that until now, bookstore shelves in Russia are littered with his many books falsifying the history of WWII and WWII.
Yes, in the early 90s, when the official historical literature explained everything "by a sudden unexpected attack by Germany, superior forces of the Germans, in tanks and planes," and we had, according to "Memories and Reflections" of Marshal Zhukov: "obsolete gasoline tanks that burned like candles ", which were few, as well as aircraft, then Rezun's" revelations "were perceived as a breakthrough in the ossified officialdom.
But now, when much has been discovered, and already documented, including on the Internet for wide access, published refuting Rezun and his supporters (like M. Solonin), historical objective research, WHO allows further rezunits to falsify the history of our Victory? Who benefits from this? Pro-Western liberals-anti-Soviet, Russophobia? Or is it just an elementary capitalist profit that came from anything, even from the lies that pollute our historical memory?

[Rostislav Prokopenko]

So not only rezun, but also the nose cue with Fomenko are still in the lead in sales. It is easy to read and introduces a secret type. Here is the people and hawala. And to read books by serious historians, especially with a lot of numbers
statistics, it is necessary to be very interested in the topic.

[nathanael]

Have you read anything from Fomenko.and Nosovsky.? If so, what conclusions did you make

[Rostislav Prokopenko]

Read. Somehow, the question immediately arose - how can technology transfer the historical layer with all artifacts practically across the whole of Russia so that no one notices? Even without saving layers with artifacts, just imagine the amount of work .....
And so - yes. Interesting reading. But if one person says that ALL the rest are wrong, and delving into sections of knowledge in which he is not a specialist, maybe he is still wrong?
All conclusions were made on allegedly incorrect dates of total eclipses, without taking into account other sources in which total and incomplete eclipses were described identically. And linguists, according to his idea of ​​vocalizing or not vocalizing (maybe I remember incorrectly) words in Russian, passed a heavy tractor. But this is not my glade.

[nathanael]

Fomenko and Nosovsky do not claim to be the ultimate truth. Their research can be considered as one of the variants of the historical process. But among professional historians there is no one who could competently and most importantly, with such an abundance of material studied, object. Well, apart from spitting and wild proposals to create some kind of commission. Something we will soon get to the index of banned books ..

[hammer it]

Are you proposing to ban Rezun & Co as "Jehovah's Witnesses" or "Mein Kampf"?
It seems to me too primitive. After all, they have long understood the work of such "partners" as Rezun and Solzhenitsyn ... Empty, these pearls serve as an example of "Goebbelsyatina", the fierce low-grade agitation of the Fashington Regional Committee.

[vladimirZ]

Are you proposing to ban Rezun & Co as "Jehovah's Witnesses" or "Mein Kampf"? - hammerite (Andrey)

No, nothing can be achieved by prohibition, but the situation when the largest part of the books of the traitor Rezun in the sections of historical literature in bookstores is also wrong.
The best option for publishing Rezun’s books, since you won’t get rid of him in the liberal period of government, publish it only in collections of authors, together with the authors refuting his lies.

[NEXUS]

Quote: vladimirZ

Concerning the traitorous writer Rezun, it is striking that until now, bookstore shelves in Russia are littered with his many books falsifying the history of WWII and WWII.

Moreover, in the annotation of ALL the books of Rezun, as a flag there is a quote that the death sentence for him has not been canceled to this day in the Russian Federation. This is served as some kind of super achievement.
Now no one needs this scribbler and nafig, but in the days of the USSR they did not remove the traitor in vain. Although his crime is no statute of limitations.

[Siberian54]

The British intelligence services are actively continuing ideological. the war .. And the idea of ​​propagandons from MI5, MI6 voiced by the traitor is simply refuted: stop looking at the western borders, turn towards Asia, and there our country has an agreement on neutrality and non-aggression of the USSR-JAPAN and there is an article in it: in case of aggression by any contracting party against third, the treaty becomes null and void. What did Bismarck say about the war on two fronts? And keep in mind at that time the train mass-net 250 tons of Moscow-Vladik went on for almost a month .. In 41, 20 divisions from Siberia to Moscow moved 4 (FOUR) MONTHS ..

[NEXUS]

Quote: Well, how else

Interesting ... All the proof of the rezun's wrong came down to some kind of phrasebooks. "Load oranges in barrels." O. Bender.

Dear, I am Suvorov (Rezun has read more than one of his creations). Starting with the Aquarium and ending with Day-M. Many of his "facts" are far-fetched. For example ... Rezun claims that the dismantling of the Stalin Line indirectly means that the USSR was NOT going to defend itself, namely to attack, as a result of which we did not need this defensive line. But ... even Wikipedia is talking about this ...

After joining the USSR in the 1939 — 1940 years of Western Belarus, Western Ukraine, the Baltic republics and Bessarabia - the “Stalin Line” was mothballed, and about 300 km west, a new Molotov Line began to be built. Armament from the SD "Stalin's Line" was removed and handed over to warehouses, and partly transferred to new fortifications. G.K. Zhukov in his memoirs explains this by the lack of machine gun and cannon armament

But Rezun is modestly silent about this.
By the way, in the Soviet Union, these fortified areas were never officially called the "Stalin Line." So they were called only by German propaganda and the Western press. This name first appeared in December 1936, in an article by the Russian-language newspaper Segodnya, published in Latvia. Then this article was reprinted in the British newspaper Daily Express, and the term "Stalin's line" became widespread.
But I personally had only one fact of the biography of this sluggish pepper, is that he is a RANGE, that is, a TRAITOR. Dot. What is there to talk about and especially believe this muskrat?

[CentDo]

But Rezun is modestly silent about this.

And here you are wrong. I am not a fan of Rezun and his theories, but I read his books for general development. It does not remain silent about the "Molotov Line", it says that it did not have a support zone and was erected too close to the border, practically in full view of the Germans. And from this it is concluded that no one was going to seriously defend themselves on it.

[kush62]

Well, how else (Yuliy Babich) Yesterday, 05:39
-3
Interesting ... All the proof of the rezun's wrong came down to some kind of phrasebooks. "Load oranges in barrels." O. Bender.

And the proof of the rezun was reduced to the Russian-German phrasebook "Load oranges in barrels." O. Bender. Here is the logic you get

[kenig1]

Nina, have fun in the morning!

[Same lech]

And the fact that the main forces were located on the western borders and the USSR intensified the release of fighters, the fighter was a purely offensive vehicle, their range is not far from this airfields were very close to the borders for what? Give a million, O. Bender.

What other forces ...
the military went on vacation ... the rest were in the barracks.
Most of the equipment was obsolete ... the army did not complete its rearmament ... there was an order from Stalin not to give the Germans a reason to start a war ... that is, it was forbidden to categorically respond to the Germans' provocations.
By the end of the day on June 22, most of our aviation was destroyed after flying over the destroyed airfields and learning about the scale of the losses, General I.I. Kopets shot himself in his office around 18:00 on the same day.

Give me a million, O. Bender.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: nina1961vk

And the fact that the main forces were at the western borders

Have you tried to learn materiel? Check out the plans for the deployment of the Red Army - by the way, at the same time you will find out that they largely copied the plans for the deployment of the Russian imperial army ... Apparently, even then they wanted to conquer all of Europe

[Mr Credo]

It’s strange. If Rezun is so dumb, how could he make a career? This already seems far from the first author to debunk Rezug. With the opinion that Hitler himself came to power, I disagree. Given the humiliated position of Germany after the defeat. The insult of the Germans, the interest of financial tycoons, did their job. And who has benefited the most from this war? Who is this beneficiary? It's like Poroshenko became president by accident! And EBN purely by accident a wave made?

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Mister Creed

It’s strange. If Rezun is so dumb, how could he make a career?

But he is not stupid, he made an excellent capitalist on his books. Nobody will feed a deserter just like that.

[apro]

It’s not quite him. The books were written by all of my people. A very subtle historical diversion. And how many of them were printed in all the books ... take them ... there is not much of them. Mainly propaganda.

[Pete mitchell]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

Quote: Mister Creed

It’s strange. If Rezun is so dumb, how could he make a career?

But he is not stupid, he made an excellent capitalist on his books. Nobody will feed a deserter just like that.

and on your own books? Opinions were repeatedly voiced that even the style of his "narratives" is different, from book to book. I read somewhere that all his "global" works, such as the dayM and the icebreaker, were written with the participation of the kids from the strategic planning of the Britons. And narratives of "local significance" such as the aquarium and special forces were created within the walls of an "ugly building on the Thames", aka intelligence. The traitor does not throw lots; such people have been used, are used and will be used. Pure propoganda, at first it worked in the west, after the fall of the Soviet Union we are fed with this byaka - sow a grain of doubt ..

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Pete Mitchell

and on their books?

And who knows, you understand very well that I didn’t stand behind him :))) Maybe he wasn’t, maybe he, but they helped him, maybe they just gave him guidance ...

[Pete mitchell]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

. you understand perfectly well that I didn’t stand behind him ..

It’s a pity, maybe they would have forgotten everything about him already
I think they didn’t just help him, his curators just competently played out the situation with the defector. First of all, his books were fed to the West, the main leitmotif about the terrible and terrible Russians is always in trend - you need to defend yourself, you need weapons, and then on the list. When the opportunity arose to sow a grain of doubt, doubts began in our heads, and somewhere, too, "we had to go to court. The bourgeois still hawk this canoe about the Gulag for a sweet soul and believe that it still exists

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Pete Mitchell

Sorry

Me too! I would ... could not resist :))))))

[kush62]

Andrey from Chelyabinsk (Andrey) Yesterday, 09:11
+1
Quote: Pete Mitchell
and on their books?

And who knows, you understand very well that I didn’t stand behind him :))) Maybe he wasn’t, maybe he, but they helped him, maybe they just gave him guidance ...

Brezhnev's book "Celina" was once released in the USSR. Who wrote, who knows?

[Sergej1972]

They wrote that perhaps Alexander Bovin.

[Galleon]

I don't really understand the need to argue against the traitor Rezun as a person and as a writer. On the one hand, and on the other hand, it is such that it is better not to get into it. The polemic with such outright liars looks like a fight against windmills. Isn't it easier one day, at some conference or forum of writers, publishers and historians, to once raise a secondary issue about his books, to make a definition and forever make this body "persona non grata" in the literary world? Well and ruin the business of its publishers forever "for posterity as an example"?

[Silhouette]

Firstly, Rezun is not a writer. (Historian, publicist). He has nothing to do with literature.
Secondly, it is impossible to refute the military cooperation of the USSR with Hitler in the military sphere in the prewar time, the partition of Poland and the squeezing of Bessarabia from Romania.
Continue to believe that Finland can attack the USSR even theoretically.
Thirdly, if Rezun’s argument was so simple, we wouldn’t discuss it now.

[kitt409]

Well, the Finnish professor who wrote the book about Finland’s plans at one time, he didn’t know anything at all, it’s been read a long time ago, they wanted the main impression, but didn’t have time ...

[kush62]

Silhouette Today, 11:56 AM NEW
0
Firstly, Rezun is not a writer. (Historian, publicist). He has nothing to do with literature.
Secondly, it is impossible to refute the military cooperation of the USSR with Hitler in the military sphere in the prewar time, the partition of Poland and the squeezing of Bessarabia from Romania.
Continue to believe that Finland can attack the USSR even theoretically.
Thirdly, if Rezun’s argument was so simple, we wouldn’t discuss it now.

And firstly, and secondly and in the following it is simply a TRADER !!!

[Siberian54]

And who was attacking Leningrad from the north-west and whose bombers bombed the city in June?

[Sergej1972]

The USSR never recognized the annexation of Bessarabia to Romania, and the Romanians always took this into account in their policy. On Soviet maps in the 20-30s. Bessarabia was designated as a territory temporarily occupied by "boyar Romania".

[nathanael]

What a nonsense .. What kind of bureaucracy .. In the memoirs of one political officer in considerable ranks in the Air Force, there was a practice when the declared results were cut in reports two or three times. And about Golovanov nonsense ... The air marshal himself resigned .. After the war, where to attach such a horde of marshals. The most prominent were left. And he did not disappear. He graduated from a literary institute, worked as a translator .. And the phrasebooks are also incomprehensible. Before the war there was a period of friendship with the Germans. German was introduced in schools. Our musicians brazenly remade German ma rshi in soviet. March of aviators, for example .....

[Sergej1972]

Well, not a crowd. All war marshals held leading positions in the 50s and 60s. And the Marshals of the Soviet Union, and the marshals of the armed forces. Many well-known military leaders became marshals after the war. In general, in the 50-70s. there were several times more marshals than during the war. Marshal of the Soviet Union Beria was shot in 1953, Marshal of the Soviet Union Bulganin in 1958 was demoted to colonel general. But neither Beria nor Bulganin were real military leaders. If we take the marshals of the military branches, in the late 40s and early 50s they shot Khudyakov, several marshals of the military branches were demoted, but restored after Stalin's death. In the early 60s, the rank of major general was reduced to major general artillery marshal Varentsov. in connection with the Penkovsky case.
The search was with air marshals, who after the war often held honorable posts. A special case of Golovanov. Kibalchich’s grandson, a security officer, then a civilian fleet pilot, rose from Lieutenant Colonel to the Chief Marshal of Aviation in three and a half years. He fell into disgrace during the lifetime of Stalin, although he was his faithful supporter. After 1953, he was accused of being on friendly terms with Beria, and also, during the command of the airborne corps (the Chief Air Marshal at the head of the corps!), He sought to increase his authority among the paratroopers. The paratroopers really respected him. This was the only retired Chief Marshal (and, in general, Marshal) in the history of the USSR. But the title itself did not deprive him. Although the country's leadership invited him to voluntarily apply to the USSR PVS for demotion to the rank of colonel general, he worked as deputy director of the research institute. As for the work as a translator, you obviously mixed up with Admiral Kuznetsov. By the way, to disgrace both Golovanov and Kuznetsov put Zhukov’s hand. Which, however, did not prevent Golovanov from communicating with Zhukov after the removal of the latter from the highest posts in the state in 1957. By the way, about Golovanov at VO wrote https://topwar.ru/75702-sinusoida-marshala-golovanova.html; https://topwar.ru/94702-shef-pilot-aeroflota-esche-raz-o-marshale-golovanove-ae.html.
About the Aviators' March. Soviet melody, performed since 1923. Then the German communists began to use it. And then the Nazis began to use the melody. "Herbei zum Kampf ..."

[Sergey Zhikharev]

The whole concept of Suvorov-Rezun that the USSR was preparing to attack Germany, and planned the whole situation, is divided by two interrelated issues
1. Where according to the PLAN (Stalin / Zhukov / Rezun) were German troops supposed to be?
2. Why did German troops have to be there?

[kitt409]

Rezun in ancient times, someone Chobitok exposed, then there was such a site on the Internet, quite a while, though, mainly on BTT ...

[boriz]

It’s too late to expose Rezun with arguments of 15 years ago. Martirosyan A.B. and Kozinkin O.D. did everything possible with the current degree of openness of documents. We are talking about large-scale betrayal of the command staff of ZAPOVO, KOVO and higher. In no case will this version become official in the coming years. Descendants are alive, nobody needs a scandal. It’s easier to declare people as cowards and traitors. There is no one to intercede for the people.
And Rezun's version had some success 25 years ago for the simple reason that people simply did not believe in Stalin's idiocy, and categorically refused to consider the rank and file as a bunch of cowards and traitors. Since there was no sane alternative version, many believed Rezun's version. Moreover, he writes to the envy of many scribblers. And some of his books are just useful. The same "Purification".
So the reason for Rezun’s popularity is the position of official historians since Khrushchev. Stalin spent a long time trying to figure out what happened before and at the beginning of the war. It is enough to recall the five questions of General Pokrovsky. When he began to approach the truth, he suddenly died. And away we go, they hung on him both repression and defeat in the 41st year.

[Dzafdet]

Quote: Mr Credo

It’s strange. If Rezun is so dumb, how could he make a career? This already seems far from the first author to debunk Rezug. With the opinion that Hitler himself came to power, I disagree. Given the humiliated position of Germany after the defeat. The insult of the Germans, the interest of financial tycoons, did their job. And who has benefited the most from this war? Who is this beneficiary? It's like Poroshenko became president by accident! And EBN purely by accident a wave made?

Under the guise of Rezun, a team of authors writes books. This can be seen by the style of presentation. There are 5 people there. And Rezun is a screen, although he writes about service in the ranks of the USSR Armed Forces interestingly ..

[SASHA OLD]

Quote: Dzafdet

Quote: Mr Credo

It’s strange. If Rezun is so dumb, how could he make a career? This already seems far from the first author to debunk Rezug. With the opinion that Hitler himself came to power, I disagree. Given the humiliated position of Germany after the defeat. The insult of the Germans, the interest of financial tycoons, did their job. And who has benefited the most from this war? Who is this beneficiary? It's like Poroshenko became president by accident! And EBN purely by accident a wave made?

Under the guise of Rezun, a team of authors writes books. This can be seen by the style of presentation. There are 5 people there. And Rezun is a screen, although he writes about service in the ranks of the USSR Armed Forces interestingly ..

It contrasts especially strongly with his interview: sometimes he simply cannot normally build a sentence, and in books the nightingale trills - everything is neat and the vocabulary is clearly richer. To know the enemy "by sight" I read all of his books except one ...
He is an ordinary traitor to the Motherland, who began to be published on order with the help of "black writers"

[Catfish]

Good night guys!

What is the name of the author of the clips and where you can see everything yourself without outside help. If in the know, let me know.
I will be grateful.

[hammer it]

You press on reproduction, and you look. To go to YouTube, click on the YouTube icon at the bottom left ...


Here are the authors and a more complete version:

[Catfish]

Quote: hammerite

You press on reproduction, and you look. To go to YouTube, click on the YouTube icon at the bottom left ...

Thanks Andrew.

Holiday greetings! All the best and health!

[SASHA OLD]

just look at Yulin Boris Vitalievich, Isaev Alexei Valerievich, Isaev is generally considered to be one of the best researchers of WWII and the Great Patriotic War in particular

[Valery56]

Colleagues, not upset. History is built on facts, not speculation. With mutual interest I read the books of Rezun and his main whistleblower Isaev. Nonsense write. But RARE photographs of the technology of the Great War with the TTD is not the most important achievement of the site. But in books on paper, I saw a lot and felt a lot.