When the aggressor never showed up ...

8
The “hybrid” war that is currently under way in Ukraine has a number of strange features. One of them, according to the chief editor of the Alternatio.org website, Andrey Vajra, is its one-sidedness. For years, 5, the independent state, as it were, is fighting the frantic aggressor and believes in it. However, in fact, the aggressor for this war did not appear.

When the aggressor never showed up ...




The whole bitter irony of what is happening between Ukraine and Russia is that the Kremlin aggression is like a ghost: many people talk about it, but no one has seen it.

The fact that there are no regular units of the Russian army on the territory of Ukraine that would fight against the APU is a confirmation of this.

Meanwhile, the Ukrainian president Poroshenko to this day is trying to prove to the western public the fact of the Russian invasion of 200 thousand people into the territory of Ukraine. Andrei Vajra notes that this is the first invasion in the world, which must be proved, because before stories all military invasions were obvious.

Why Poroshenko never recognize the absence of aggression on the part of Russia? Why is the Ukrainian army today a multi-thousand crime generator? Why the war with an imaginary aggressor can lead Ukraine to self-destruction? Answers to these and other questions in the video “Crime and Punishment”:

8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    11 December 2018 11: 54
    The fact that Russia did not come to the war with ukrofashists is not good, because in the end Russia is slowly losing .. It was necessary to appear, in 2014 there was a legitimate reason to restore the power of the legally elected president and hold elections under our control .. had a completely different Ukraine and would not have US instructors on the territory of Ukraine .. Plus a huge sales market, plus a huge amount of money invested in Ukraine would not go down the drain .. In short, some pluses .. minus one for the "elite" Russian, they would all be arrested abroad ..
    1. +3
      11 December 2018 12: 01
      I agree. In 2014, after the Crimea, it was necessary to put Yanyk on armor and carry him to Kiev and Lviv. The Armed Forces of Ukraine, having not yet soiled their hands with the blood of Donetsk miners, would have immediately followed the example of their Crimean colleagues and would have captured the militants trained in Poland in a matter of days.
    2. +8
      11 December 2018 12: 17
      We would have a Ukraine with unreleased and driven deep into nationalism. For a very large part of them, it would be "these came again and established their own rules." Would it suit them? No, of course not.

      It is as if instead of releasing pus from the wound, they would smear top with green stuff and cover it with a band-aid. Now the Russian Federation is paying for the mistakes of the post-war USSR when it was necessary to judge not only the German elite, but also Shukhevych and Bandera in Nuremberg. Now the current Natsik would have remained only Mazepa as a national hero.

      I also did not agree that in the year 14 the Russian Federation did not actively intervene. But now the situation is developing according to the principle - the worse the better. Nationalism should be eliminated by the Ukrainians themselves, in the brains they should take the place that a bad life is not because of Muscovites, but because they themselves are. Hot Ukrainian heads are best treated by applying to a cold winter battery.
      1. +2
        11 December 2018 13: 11
        Quote: gridd

        We would have a Ukraine with unreleased and driven deep into nationalism. For a very large part of them, it would be "these came again and established their own rules." Would it suit them? No, of course not.

        Nonsense .. this nationalism before the Second World War was after and nothing, everything was fine .. Nationalism is like mold, if you create the conditions, it will grow .. That's just now these conditions are created ..
        Quote: gridd
        It is as if instead of releasing pus from the wound, they would smear top with green stuff and cover it with a band-aid.

        That you tell the English or the Basques .. do not listen to the liberals and Kisilevschina ..
        1. +2
          11 December 2018 14: 20
          In Russia, RNE was pressed to the nail. And so we could bloom in double color.
          It only seems to me that the Russian fascists would first of all slaughter Ukrainian and Baltic nationalists.
  2. +2
    11 December 2018 12: 11
    ... Poroshenko to this day is trying to prove to the Western public the fact of the Russian invasion

    It’s not even funny anymore, especially since it’s a sin to laugh at sick people. It is necessary to treat it, and not on an outpatient basis, but in ward No. 6. And so that he would not be bored, let it be shared, with Napoleon, the prosecutor and other interlocutors ... It would be nice to add May, Trump, etc. lol
  3. +4
    11 December 2018 13: 35
    On the outskirts in 2014, the opportunity was lost to return Novorossia - they were afraid to support the referendums (except for the Crimea, for obvious reasons). In 2016 they became the liberation of Mariupol - a consequence of the influence of moneybags who had connections with the ukroligarch. As a result of cowardice, betrayal, we have everything the same as it would be if we had not given slack in 2014. 2016. And the western part could continue to boil in their own shukhevychev-bander shit.
  4. 0
    11 December 2018 15: 59
    Yes. And for a year now, Ukrainians are about to, about to go on the offensive. Judging by the news