In Ukraine, Poroshenko advised or fight, or remove camouflage
Ukrainian media published an article by the Deputy Chief Editor of a major information and analytical resource of Ukraine, Zn.ua, Sergey Rakhmanin. The article is devoted to the martial law introduced in the country and the actions of the Ukrainian authorities. Rakhmanin makes it clear that the military situation in the country is simultaneously a political step and an attempt to legitimize the actions of armed radicals.
The article mentions the situation of 2014-2015, when there was no martial law in Ukraine, and armed representatives of the National Bolsheviks shot at compatriots, took away their property, including cars, claiming that all this was for army needs.
Rakhmanin:
The author of the article doubted that Poroshenko, according to the level of his legal knowledge, rightly received the title of candidate of law. Rakhmanin noted that martial law always and everywhere limits the rights of citizens and in fact applies only when the state is no longer able to do without limiting civil rights.
According to Sergei Rakhmanin, the frank hypocrisy of the Ukrainian authorities are statements in the style of "Farewell, unwashed Russia!"
Rakhmanin, addressing the country's president:
According to the author of the article, it is regrettable that “legal negligence” with which martial law was introduced in Ukraine. Rakhmanin notes that Poroshenko constantly talks about the looming threat, but he never talks about the extent of his own responsibility.
Rakhmanin added that the imposed martial law will definitely not help for those who are actually engaged in strengthening the defense in the country. According to the deputy chief editor Zn.ua, martial law from Poroshenko is not “the answer of Russia”, since Moscow does not harm anything.
At the end of the article, Rakhmanin sums up, noting that the only goal that could be pursued by Petro Poroshenko with the introduction of the EaP was precisely the abolition (or postponement) of elections in the country, as well as the exploitation of the status of “protector from Putin”.
The article mentions the situation of 2014-2015, when there was no martial law in Ukraine, and armed representatives of the National Bolsheviks shot at compatriots, took away their property, including cars, claiming that all this was for army needs.
Rakhmanin:
Talk that martial law, recently introduced in Ukrainian regions in 10, in no way impairs rights and freedoms, is either a conscious lie or a demonstration of legal illiteracy.
The author of the article doubted that Poroshenko, according to the level of his legal knowledge, rightly received the title of candidate of law. Rakhmanin noted that martial law always and everywhere limits the rights of citizens and in fact applies only when the state is no longer able to do without limiting civil rights.
According to Sergei Rakhmanin, the frank hypocrisy of the Ukrainian authorities are statements in the style of "Farewell, unwashed Russia!"
Rakhmanin, addressing the country's president:
Do not need this nagging pathos. Or fight, or camouflage take off.
According to the author of the article, it is regrettable that “legal negligence” with which martial law was introduced in Ukraine. Rakhmanin notes that Poroshenko constantly talks about the looming threat, but he never talks about the extent of his own responsibility.
Rakhmanin added that the imposed martial law will definitely not help for those who are actually engaged in strengthening the defense in the country. According to the deputy chief editor Zn.ua, martial law from Poroshenko is not “the answer of Russia”, since Moscow does not harm anything.
At the end of the article, Rakhmanin sums up, noting that the only goal that could be pursued by Petro Poroshenko with the introduction of the EaP was precisely the abolition (or postponement) of elections in the country, as well as the exploitation of the status of “protector from Putin”.
Information