Military Review

In Afghanistan: NATO promised to withdraw troops if our people want it

26
The representative of the High Peace Council of Afghanistan, Ihsan Taheri, stated that the NATO countries allegedly declared their readiness to withdraw their troops from the Islamic Republic if the Afghan people want it.


In Afghanistan: NATO promised to withdraw troops if our people want it


Taheri quoted a statement that allegedly sounded from Kabul’s NATO partners:
As the people of Afghanistan decide, so be it.


This statement sounds particularly cynical, given that the people of Afghanistan did not call upon the military personnel of NATO countries.

Recall that the invasion occurred after the events of September 11 2001 in the United States. The then President of the United States said that the operation in Afghanistan "will help to finally defeat international terrorism." At the same time, George W. Bush has still not explained why the introduction of American troops took place precisely in Afghanistan, although, as it turned out, the aircraft that rammed the Pentagon building and the World Trade Center towers were controlled by Saudi Arabia who passed flight courses in the United States.

Returning to the NATO promises about the withdrawal of troops, it is necessary to note the addition from the aforementioned Ihsan Taheri. According to him, while the situation in Afghanistan does not allow to abandon the military support of foreign countries. And "when peace and stability come, it will be possible to talk about the withdrawal of NATO forces from Afghanistan."

And didn’t this person ask the question that peace and stability in Afghanistan might not be exactly as long as NATO (primarily American) troops are present on Afghan soil?

Recall that during the presence of American troops in Afghanistan, the volume of drug trafficking increased dozens of times, the standard of living of the local population at least did not increase, the country was flooded with all sorts of terrorist groups, including the banned in Russia by ISIL.

Against this background, the Afghan press publishes a statement by NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg, who said that NATO "expects Russia to help establish a peace process in Afghanistan." It is noteworthy that Stoltenberg said that "Iran could have joined in this process." This is despite the fact that Russia and Iran, the United States, has lately been constantly calling its enemies.
Photos used:
https://www.facebook.com/usforces.afghanistan/
26 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mamuka Petrovich
    Mamuka Petrovich 5 December 2018 11: 09
    +8
    And when they entered Afghanistan, did you ask the people?
    1. SSR
      SSR 5 December 2018 11: 13
      +4
      Quote: Mamuka Petrovich
      And when they entered Afghanistan, did you ask the people?

      And who did they ask?
      Either they bring "democracy" to the Koreans, now they bring it to the Iraqis, Vietnamese, Serbs, and Syrians, they want to bring it to the Iranians, they bring it to the Ukrainians.
      Here's a damn prolific chicken, everywhere dropping its eggs of "democracy".
      Anglo-Saxon bald broiler, steroids, antibiotics and hormones.
      1. astepanov
        astepanov 5 December 2018 11: 34
        -4
        Quote: SSR
        steroids, antibiotics and hormones
        Are steroids not hormones? And who was bothered by antibiotics that saved millions of lives? You would have dragged vitamins and computers. Just to blur ...
        1. SSR
          SSR 5 December 2018 15: 21
          +2
          Quote: astepanov
          who was prevented by antibiotics that saved millions of lives?

          You would not confuse the warm with the soft.
          When a person consumes chicken meat in which there are antibiotics, ........ when antibiotic treatment is needed, it may not be effective, etc., etc.
          Quote: astepanov
          Are steroids not hormones?

          So yes, steroids are not hormones.

          Bryakayte further, but be careful with antibiotics, doctors do not in vain warn that they must be used in full, otherwise the infection "gets used to them" and do not confuse steroids and hormones anymore.
          1. astepanov
            astepanov 6 December 2018 09: 35
            -1
            Quote: SSR
            When a person consumes chicken meat that has antibiotics, ........ when antibiotic treatment is needed, it may not be effective

            Do not hang noodles on the ears of a chemist with a university education and experience of 40 years. Antibiotics are unstable and in the chicken body are destroyed in a matter of hours - as in the human, however. The analysis does not detect antibiotics in meat, but their metabolites.
            Quote: SSR
            So yes, steroids are not hormones.
            Well yes, tell this to your grandmother. Prednisolone, not to mention those used as doping in sports - methandrostenolone, Sustanon and other testosterone esters, including testosterone itself - are all one steroids. You are illiterate and stubborn, sir. And touchy, like a schoolgirl.
            1. SSR
              SSR 6 December 2018 09: 54
              0
              Quote: astepanov
              You are illiterate and stubborn, sir. And touchy, like a schoolgirl.

              Look in the mirror.

              Quote: astepanov
              methandrostenolone, sustanon and other esters testosterone, including testosterone itself - all as one steroids.

              Isolated, this is correct, steroids, but testosterone is already a hormone.
              I bow out. Pour from empty to empty, it's not mine.
    2. Svarog
      Svarog 5 December 2018 11: 15
      +4
      Quote: Mamuka Petrovich
      And when they entered Afghanistan, did you ask the people?

      Exactly, the people obviously will not want this, again crimes are covered by democracy ...
      1. The black
        The black 5 December 2018 11: 26
        0
        The Taliban are already for! .....
    3. Sarmat Sanych
      Sarmat Sanych 5 December 2018 11: 42
      +5
      The P. Indos control only their bases, and 5 km from them the Sharia law and the Taliban are the master. This is the whole result of the Indian "operation" in Afghanistan.
      1. 2001 - The Taliban controls 44% of Afghanistan.
      2. Since 2001, the United States has spent about $ 900 billion on the fight against the Taliban.
      3 - Taliban controls about 2018% of Afghanistan
      PS Just a week ago, the Taliban killed 4 US marines and injured at least 4 more.
    4. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 5 December 2018 14: 11
      -1
      And wherever they went they did not ask anyone, and they never go out of there. An example - in 1945, troops were brought into Germany and Japan and still have not been withdrawn. They talk a lot, but they do little.
  2. Andrey Chistyakov
    Andrey Chistyakov 5 December 2018 11: 11
    +2
    Stolteberg listen to the same as any Western politician.
  3. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 5 December 2018 11: 11
    +1
    Well, yes, it remains to hold a referendum, and whether NATO will decide whether it is legitimate or not, and whether Moscow’s hand is there. what
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 5 December 2018 11: 15
    +3
    As the people of Afghanistan decide, so be it.
    The Americans did not ask him (the people) when 17 years ago they brought in their own and their allies' troops. And they can leave only for one reason - when their losses are comparable to those in Vietnam. Therefore, the "people" still have to work and work, and work for real, and not whisper with the Americans.
  5. Evil echo
    Evil echo 5 December 2018 11: 17
    +6
    "... the Afghan press publishes a statement by NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg, who said that NATO" expects from Russia help in establishing the peace process in Afghanistan. "It is noteworthy that Stoltenberg said that" Iran could also join this process. " that Russia and Iran, the same USA, have recently been constantly calling their enemies. "

    This is probably what would then blame all their failure on the Russian Federation and Iran.
    1. 41 REGION
      41 REGION 5 December 2018 11: 29
      +3
      Quote: Evil Echo
      "... This is probably what would then blame all his failure on the Russian Federation and Iran.

      They will also throw up drug trafficking in weapons to terrorist groups yes
      In this case, the Russian Federation or Iran get bogged down in the war, the Americans will reduce costs and will fight with someone else’s hands, plus they will continue to profit from drug trafficking belay
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 5 December 2018 14: 16
      +1
      Thank you, but we are stepping on the same rake twice.
  6. Mamuka Petrovich
    Mamuka Petrovich 5 December 2018 11: 18
    +2
    They climbed in, but now I don't know how to get out while "saving my face"
  7. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 5 December 2018 11: 18
    +1
    No one listens to the people, that means they will never withdraw, agronomists, money, traffic.
  8. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 5 December 2018 11: 32
    +3
    Quote: Tank jacket
    No one listens to the people, that means they will never withdraw, agronomists, money, traffic.

    They will not give up such a freebie on drugs until the sane Afghans take them out of there!
  9. Evil echo
    Evil echo 5 December 2018 11: 42
    0
    Quote: 41 REGION
    Quote: Evil Echo
    "... This is probably what would then blame all his failure on the Russian Federation and Iran.

    They will also throw up drug trafficking in weapons to terrorist groups yes
    In this case, the Russian Federation or Iran get bogged down in the war, the Americans will reduce costs and will fight with someone else’s hands, plus they will continue to profit from drug trafficking belay

    Well, that’s if the troops aren’t smart enough to re-enter there. And so it seemed to slip that some kind of dialogue was being established.
  10. vvp2412
    vvp2412 5 December 2018 11: 49
    +2
    But the Afghans have not yet been promised: Thousands a day, visa-free travel, croissants on monmart with cava and tickets to the Vienna opera at a discount? :)
  11. Nitarius
    Nitarius 5 December 2018 12: 20
    +2
    lying top of the STATES!
    and the Anglo-Saxons!
  12. taiga2018
    taiga2018 5 December 2018 12: 33
    +1
    since in Afghanistan we have exchanged places with the states, we must go all the way, they used to help the Mujahideen, and we need to help the Taliban, especially since we are still blamed for this ...
  13. Bypassed
    Bypassed 5 December 2018 12: 44
    -1
    If the drug trafficking channels are seized and taken under control - then why don’t they leave - there are no losses, but there is money.
  14. Tutejszy
    Tutejszy 5 December 2018 14: 22
    +1
    What's the problem? Hold a popular referendum!
  15. sharp-lad
    sharp-lad 5 December 2018 23: 59
    0
    The chatterbox has an obvious bifurcation of reduced social responsibility! laughing