Bulk and "sleeping patriots"
And here, by the way, for some reason, the desire to joke and mock completely disappeared. Because it came to the understanding that things were serious in the yard.
In many media outlets, especially those not very benevolently related to the authorities and the media in power, the word “sleeping” has flashed. Maybe someone did not watch the series, so you need a translation? But no question!
So, “asleep” is called agents who were previously deployed to government agencies, law enforcement agencies, and mass media, who were waiting for a team of active actions in “sleep mode”. After receiving the appropriate command, the “sleeping” agent is activated and starts working for the benefit of its part.
So, Mr. Brilev, with his English citizenship, was exposed not so much on time, but simply that it was exposed. But the main thing is not even the exposure of Brilev, one of the leading patriotic TV presenters. If he was alone ...
The main thing in stories that behind the Brilev machine pulled others. And today it is just possible to imagine how deep and how many are "sleeping" in the media.
Yes, Brilev himself does not deny anything. Well, he has the citizenship of a country that, to put it mildly, historically hates Russia. And in this country there are elite real estate for a tidy sum of 700 thousand pounds.
It is clear that the correspondent and the presenter of such money is simply not able to make money. Earned his lucky business woman and wife in combination. True, the projects in which Irina Brilev officially appears are mostly unprofitable for some reason, but earned money on Brilev's apartment.
Brilev himself not only confirmed his citizenship, he does not see anything like that in this. Say, an employee of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise (which is the TC "Russia") - not a civil servant. And according to the nature of the work, Brilev has no access to the state secrets.
Well what can I say ... 66 millions for an apartment ... God save the queen!
It is clear that we will not hear from Brilev here. On the contrary, the phrase that “an Englishwoman shits us” is directly a “trick”.
And another nuance. It has already resulted in the media, that indeed, the FSB and the FMS, Mr. Brilev, properly informed about his second citizenship, here without any questions. But evil tongues from VGTRK claim that nothing was known about this on the board of the TV channel.
But it already let the employee and the employer themselves understand each other.
The main Sands already voiced. Brilev’s possession of British citizenship “cannot be a cause for accusation or criticism.” So Peskov said in an interview with Ekho Moskvy.
Well, what said Sands, we know who thought ...
But I will again. I wonder what kind of "transparent sources" of financing the purchase of an apartment for almost a million dollars spoke Brilev? And to whom he reported? Before the Russian tax or British?
I understand that before the British, otherwise he would not have been able to sell a flat. There with this strictly.
But from where a million dollars from even the first-class TV host is still a question. And how much is a million comparable to his earnings. The fact that his wife, the owner of unprofitable enterprises, could not earn a millionaire is a fact. Although ... Maybe that's why unprofitable that the apartment was bought?
But in general, the fact that our "telepatriot" has the citizenship of a frankly hostile state, more than covers and covers all its financial frauds.
I agree, by the way, that there are no such formal violations in the history of Brilev. It is said that the relevant special services now rushed to check Brilev. They check his contacts in the UK, which Brilev spawned during a long-term business trip to this country, check sources of income, since the salary of a correspondent obviously did not allow him to buy property in the elite area of London.
Of course, there are two in one. And citizenship, and flat. And everything is somewhat incomprehensible, but only one thing is clear: Brilev could well have fallen under the wing of someone or something in the UK. Well, couldn’t he, as a well-known political figure, “God give” so much?
Accordingly, our patriotic TV presenter may well be not quite the one for whom we accept him. Although not, if Peskov himself said, then no, it would not.
Nevertheless, a “sleeper” of such a level may be more than useful to the special services of a country “loving” Russia, like the UK. For example, he can, at the right time, voice the proper interpretation of a topic, especially live, give information with the right slant, ask the right question in an interview.
Can? Yes, of course!
The incident with Brilev shook up the media environment, and information about such incidents like a lump from the mountain came down.
And it turned out to be a disagreeable thing: in our leading media, not in the last roles, just a bunch of foreign citizens!
Citizenship of Great Britain has long been favored by Konstantin Ernst.
Ekaterina Andreeva (Channel One) has Montenegrin citizenship.
Ivan Urgant has Israeli citizenship.
Vladimir Pozner is a citizen of France and the USA.
Maxim Galkin - a citizen of Cyprus (with his wife Pugacheva).
Julia Vysotskaya and Andrei Konchalovsky are citizens of France.
The Maslyakov father and son have a Latvian residence permit.
And so you can continue to insanity, and if you go to the camp of big businessmen (there are no oligarchs in the country), the whole world is there.
But businessmen are slaves to their capital. And the media staff?
It would be interesting to know how many there are, those who simultaneously serve two masters? And which of the two is preferable? Problem for the FSB, anyway.
By the way, such an idea: our real enemies absolutely not necessarily all completely work on "Echo of Moscow" or "Rain." Yes, and the organization of Navalny, it turns out, can be useful.
“Sleepers” quite normally can be ardent (in words) patriots, work in state-run media, hold posts in any ministries and departments.
And just wait for the command.
The only question is who, when and for the benefit of whom will give them the order?
And no matter how it came out, as in a joke: London cannot be bombed, ours are there. Berlin can not be bombed, there are also ours. Tel Aviv can not be bombed, there is generally all ours. Well, let's in Voronezh vmazh, there are definitely no ours!
Information