Corvette "Thundering" put on degaussing

Completed with the construction of the head corvette "Gremyaschy" (project 20385) put on the "Northern Shipyard" in St. Petersburg for degaussing, reports bmpd.

The ship is scheduled for factory trials in December this year. For state tests - in August 2019. Corvette transfer to Russian the fleet expected by the end of that year.

“Thundering” was laid in February 2012, launched in June 2017. After this, the date of its transfer to the Navy was the end of 2018 of the year.

The second ship of this project "Agile" was laid in June 2013 of the year. Earlier it was planned to build 8 ships to 2020 year. However, the requirements of the Ministry of Defense to improve the project, the widespread use of imported components in it (including MTU engines) that fell under sanctions in 2014, led to the decision to limit the series to two units.

In 2017, the construction of two more corvettes was reported. This issue will be considered more specifically upon completion of the lead ship state tests.

The construction of the 20385 project ships was delayed due to the non-delivery for them of the MTU power units. In 2015, a supplementary agreement was concluded with the shipyard on the completion of the corvettes with the Russian diesel units 1DDA-12000 of the Kolomna plant. The unit consists of two 16D49 engines, hp 6000 power.

Earlier, the same engines were installed on four corvettes of the 20380 project. As of May 2015, the cost of one DDA-12000 unit was about 577 million rubles.

Comments

[wicked pinnochio]

I'm not a sailor in the sea did not go than the corvette is different from the destroyer

[Rubber]

Schooner brig is not a brig or a schooner for you. This is "Pilgrim".

[rocket757]

The ships have long been multi-functional, in principle, this is a BOD corvette in our opinion, an anti-submarine search security guard.
Destroyer, destroyer, shock-mine-missile station wagon.
Now, in general, the time of universal Even a military cargo barge can have weapons like a cruiser in the old days!

[donavi49]

Generally:
Corvette is a ship of the near sea zone, often built for non-zero opposition (that is, it must have at least some anti-aircraft defense, at least some anti-ship missiles, at least some anti-aircraft capabilities, at least some artillery).

frigate is a universal ship of the far zone. Already having serious weapons or target qualities (if we are talking about specific ships / countries - in which weapons are not the main requirement).

the destroyer is the most powerful non-carrier ship on the seas today. It has a mass of weapons, missile defense, powerful air defense (and if we talk about Burke-like / Dering, it also has high strategic missile defense capabilities).

Specifically, this ship is a redraw-underfrigate, with a price tag almost like a frigate.

After the price tag went to 18 billion - the report showed another rise in price:

6. RCMs prepared for additional agreements on the inclusion of additional costs in the cost of contractsrelated to the implementation of instructions on the customer's decisions, to state contracts for the construction of orders 922-924 of project 22350 [frigates "Admiral of the Fleet Kasatonov", "Admiral Golovko" and "Admiral of the Soviet Union Fleet Isakov"], for the construction of orders 1005-1008 projects 20385 and 20380 [corvettes "Zealous" pr. 20380, "Strogiy" pr. 20380, "Thundering"pr. 20385,"Prompt"Pr. 20385].

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Beautiful boat.

[Piramidon]

Quote: donavi49

the destroyer is the most powerful non-carrier ship on the seas today.

Even cooler than missile cruisers?

[donavi49]

Cruisers were left only in the Russian Federation and the United States (but in the United States soon everything). Build 0. The class is dead.

[Piramidon]

Quote: donavi49

Class died

But TODAY then cruisers (or cruisers) are still there. So the destroyers are not the very most.

[venik]

Quote: donavi49

the destroyer is the most powerful non-carrier ship on the seas today.

========
And I thought that "the most powerful non-aeronautical ship on the seas today" is a ROCKET CRUISER !!! ???

[donavi49]

Nobody is building them. The United States decided to cut its Tiki and replace it with a Burke. In Russia, Petya and Nakhimov + Ustinov + Varyag will remain (Moscow is in doubt).
No one else has cruisers. And nobody in the world builds them or even plans them. Only destroyers.

[Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich]

I'm sorry, but where would you like to take the cruiser if the destroyer is "the largest non-aircraft carrier on the seas today"? Or should you understand that in the course of evolution a cruiser and a destroyer evolved into a single type of warship?

[donavi49]

Yes. No one is building a cruiser. Only destroyers. All sorts of mega-destroyers are being designed on 100 + missile shafts and a bunch of electronic equipment. However, not a cruiser.

The USA has cruisers - but they are being sawed and replaced by the Berks, and Russia has nothing to replace them, so Nakhimov will be upgraded, according to Petya, how will they find money, according to 1164, repairs will be done with a little modernization.

[wicked pinnochio]

thanks a lot

[Machito]

The destroyer from the corvette differs in everything except coloring.

[Borik]

The dimensions. And that means a lot.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Angry Pinnochio

how is the corvette different from the destroyer

Corvette - approximately 1000-3000 tons
Destroyer - 9000-10000 tons

[Chicha squad]

The percentage of displacement to armament.

[rais-homidou]

Displacement.

[Irokez]

Wow. I have never seen demagnetizing such engines.

[The whistle]

Quote: Irokez

Wow. I have never seen demagnetizing such engines.

Einstein's technology! He gave us a lot of things through his "favorite spy" .. He loved her Russian bitch .. (just quietly, I'm in secret))

[gridasov]

Generally speaking, it is worth using the electronic magnetic potential, and not spend resources on demagnetization. The technology of accumulating the electronic magnetic potential in the capacitance, if I may say so, is carried out through the density of magnetic power flows and special methods and devices. It’s only obvious that few people are interested

[Piramidon]

Quote: gridasov

Generally speaking, it is worth using the electronic magnetic potential, and not spend resources on demagnetization. The technology of accumulating the electronic magnetic potential in the capacitance, if I may say so, is carried out through the density of magnetic power flows and special methods and devices. It’s only obvious that few people are interested

Well, why have you still not suggested this technology to anyone? You need to promote your ideas not on the Internet, but in KB.
It is a pity that everyone who knows how to improve technology, technology, how to fight, rule the country and make the whole nation happy, already work as managers, guards and taxi drivers. Such DAMAGES disappear on sofas!

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Whistler

Einstein's technology! He gave us a lot of things through his "favorite spy" .. He loved her Russian bitch .. (only quietly, I’m in secret)) hi

What the hell? If my memory serves me, the technology of demagnetization was invented by Keldysh at 41, already during the war. And they began to conduct demagnetization of ships in Sevastopol. In connection with the use by the Germans of magnetic mines.
Unfortunately, I can’t give a source because I don’t remember. I read about it for a long time.

[The whistle]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Keldysh invented the technology of demagnetization in 41, already during the war. And they began to conduct demagnetization of ships in Sevastopol. In connection with the use by the Germans of magnetic mines.
Unfortunately, I can’t give a source because I don’t remember. I read about it for a long time.

Well done krsnodar .. The main thing is that I didn’t take the data from the wiki, respect from this book from HERE books!

[rocket757]

Ha, imagine when "Peter the Great", the former "Andropov" was demagnetized!

[aszzz888]

... stamping in a quiet, I would like faster and more - but alas ...

[faiver]

sorry, we’re not stamping it, but almost an artel assembly ...

[Theodore]

The people! Wait a bit on the news they said that two troughs of the junta, on the Sea of ​​Azov, run into a zugunder! We are waiting for provocations!

[donavi49]

So long ago - 2 Gyurzy + Tug pulled a little, border guards pulled together - but it didn’t go further than rewinding into matyukalniki.

[donavi49]

But no, it did. Heavy PSKR Don (pictured is the border version of the tugboat) - broke the Ukrainian tugboat. Now Gyurza defend the tugboat - but the matter does not go beyond the matyukalniks. Perhaps support for Gyurzam will do.

[Theodore]

So they needed them fishing nets in the screws! And how they get up, let them prove that they have beguiled the sea!

[SOF]

Quote: donavi49

But no, it did. Heavy PSKR Don (pictured is the border version of the tugboat) - broke the Ukrainian tugboat. Now Gyurza defend the tugboat - but the matter does not go beyond the matyukalniks.

..... Parashka begs in the face in order to introduce martial law and cancel the failed elections? .....

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

What are our straight broke ?! Maybe he broke down ?!

[bayard]

Donetsk.
He piled up and broke. Engine, housing, fencing and raft ripped off.

[Yurinik]

After that, the date of the transfer of his Navy was called the horses (C) of 2018.

[on it]

Deep concern must be expressed.

[Piramidon]

Corvette "Thundering" put on degaussing

Moreman, tell me, demagnetization and cheating deviation - these are different concepts?
Py.Sy. What is "write off the deviation" I know. No need to explain.

[FC_ZP]

Of course, I’m not a moraine, but one answer: these are different concepts.
Read more about demagnetization or search engines to help?

[Waldemar]

I read somewhere nearby that they developed an engine to replace d49. More powerful and more economical. They called something like r500 or something. Why the Latin letter is not clear, but the article was