Ukrainian Ambassador Melnik in the publication The World reports that "can not stop the work of the site" Peacemaker ", as this site is private." Also, a Ukrainian diplomat said that the closure of the site "would mean persecution of free speech and legal restrictions on rights and freedom of action."
At the same time, in order not to fall into disgrace in Germany, Melnik said that he considers the emergence of such lists (lists of "Peacemaker") "wrong."
Recall that just a few days ago on the program "60 minutes" on the TV channel "Russia-1" Verkhovna Rada deputy of Ukraine Anton Gerashchenko confirmed the fact that he oversees the work of the site "Peacemaker". And Melnik claims that the site is private ...
If it is private, then why does one representative of the government interfere with his work (not just intervene, but set the tone), while another argues that it is impossible to interfere, since this is a “violation of freedom of speech”? Unfortunately, in Germany none of the journalists, Mr. Melnik, asked this question.