SAM "Poliment-Redoubt" will receive a long-range supersonic missile

The Poliment-Redut complexes will receive a new long-range supersonic rocket, which will allow to hit aerodynamic targets at an altitude of 35 km and a distance of up to 400 km, reports Izvestia, citing the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

The military department said that a new long-range supersonic rocket is being created for the Poliment-Redut anti-aircraft systems that are in service with Navy ships. The tests of the rocket will be held next year, it is planned that the rocket will be included in the armament of the Admiral Gorshkov 22350 frigates, 20380 corvettes and other promising warships on which this anti-aircraft complex is installed.

In the development of the rocket, a technological reserve of the 40H6 rocket is used, as well as the 9М96 and 9М100 missiles. Today it is known that it will be able to hit aerodynamic targets at a distance of 400 km and an altitude of 35 km. According to the developers, the rocket will be able to hit cruise and ballistic missiles, drones, and also shoot down deck-mounted attack aircraft directly above the aircraft carrier.

"Polyment-Redoubt" - an anti-aircraft missile system of the sea-based with the installation of a vertical launch, designed for ships of the class destroyer, frigate, corvette. At the moment, his ammunition includes three types of vertical-launch anti-aircraft missiles: 9М100, 9М96 and 9М96Д.

Comments

[gunnerminer]

Receive, deliver, provide, will, plan, promise.

[Andrey Chistyakov]

Quote: gunnerminer

Receive, deliver, provide, will, plan, promise.

Yes ... They did not promise with Crimea. And did not plan. And you see how it happened.

[gunnerminer]

About the promised ammunition messages are built on speculation and elements of bragging.

- They did not promise with Crimea. And did not plan-

Gooseberry is in the garden, and aunt is in Ashkelon.

[Andrey Chistyakov]

Quote: gunnerminer

About the promised ammunition messages are built on speculation and elements of bragging.

- They did not promise with Crimea. And did not plan-

Gooseberry is in the garden, and aunt is in Ashkelon.

Hello aunt ....

[Machito]

The Poliment-Redoubt supersonic missile will turn our mosquito fleet from frigates, corvettes, river-sea RTOs into a very dangerous enemy of the NATO fleet.
If ships are equipped with more supersonic missiles and decent PLO, we will get cheap enough ships to counter our opponents. In a word: asymmetric GDP response.

[Frederick]

Yes, but there is one caveat. Where is all this stuff shoved into the corvette ?! Is it rubber?

[NEXUS]

Quote: Friedrich

Where is all this stuff shoved into the corvette ?! Is it rubber?

Have you heard anything about universally PU?

[gunnerminer]

-Super sound rocket Polyment-Redoubt will turn our mosquito fleet from -

There is very little left to create at least a model of such an anti-aircraft munition. And to strengthen the mosquito boat with a hypersonic missile. At least one.

[Alex777]

The Poliment-Redoubt supersonic missile will turn our mosquito fleet from frigates, corvettes, river-sea RTOs into a very dangerous enemy of the NATO fleet.

Suddenly a door creaked in a fairy tale,
Everything became clear to me now ....
No mosquito fleet will lead anything further than 200 km.
In corvettes 20380, etc. short VPU. Even long 96 won't go there. Not to mention the new 400 km super missiles. Something like this. Unfortunately.

[hrych]

Quote: Alex777

No mosquito fleet will lead anything further than 200 km

Here, from the Caspian Sea, they hit Caliber with a distance of 1500 km, in the same Caspian for external target designation of ZGRLS Sunflower, they worked out the calculations of the RTOs to repel an air attack, but she still sees 450 km. For the 40N6 rocket, the problem will be solved simply, as Izhisa's Sm-3 works quietly from the VPU Mk 41 together with Tomahawk, so VPU 3C-14 Caliber will quite accept the long SAM. Or type they can, but we can’t type?

[Alex777]

Do not confuse warm and soft!
What does Caliber and their guidance and anti-aircraft missiles have to do with which routes are tied in real time?

Sm-3 Aegis calmly works from the VPU Mk 41 together with Tomahawk, so VPU 3S-14 Caliber will quite accept the long SAM. Or type they can, but we can’t type? laughing

Well, why write such nonsense?
Do not fly SAM from UKKS. Absolutely.
A different start for Caliber and SAM missiles (hot and cold). And the Americans are the same. Therefore no problem.

[hrych]

Quote: Alex777

A different start for Caliber and SAM missiles (hot and cold).

That's it, that an air defense missile is easier than if it were the other way around, they planted it with a mortar launch and forth. I do not see the problem. I see the problem that our engineers solve everything quite successfully, the military voiced, and our layman begins to philosophize about the impossibility of what is already working. Gauges and their guidance really have nothing to do with it, although many algorithms are already similar, in particular flight by inertial and positioning systems, path correction, and at the final stage, the operation of the GOS to hit a moving target, such as a ship. An over-the-horizon missile is inherently obliged to be guided by external target designation, it is essentially obliged to adjust the flight to the direct capture of the target by the seeker, but they forgot to ask such skeptics, for whom it was all nonsense, to forget

[Alex777]

That's it, that an air defense missile is easier than if it were the other way around, they planted it with a mortar launch and forth.

You are starving me with your tenacity and unwillingness to read the descriptions of the technique.
It is the mortar start (aka "cold") that is used in air defense. Even without your prompts.
And Caliber starts in the mine (aka "hot" method). And now, finally, understand that the UKSK allows only a hot start. Dot.
Tomahawks can hit moving targets. In version block 4 EMNIP. They tested it, but in the series it is not yet.
Caliber can not yet. But learn over time.
Over-the-horizon guidance (by over-the-horizon detection) without a network-centric data transmission and control system (which we do not yet have in working form) is a very complicated thing.
Therefore, the Yankees did not receive their 5 armored Hammers, which we got in Georgia, back. Because we need to learn something.

[hrych]

Quote: Alex777

Caliber can not yet. But learn over time

There is a caliber of the RCC variant; it quite amazes the moving targets.

[Alex777]

At what range is RCC moving targets striking?
Who, 3M-54 (continuation of Turquoise), saw her alive?
And Tomahawk - 1200 km. But the target should highlight the fighter. Although the Yankees have implemented not only online communication and command transmission, even real-time video from a rocket can be received via satellite.

[hrych]

Judging by the affected objects in the form of a concrete house for 1500 km, there certainly was a correction in the final section and the target was highlighted or aimed at the camera. RCC Caliber 3M-54E has a maximum firing range, km 220 (20 - supersonic section), and 3M-54E1 without a supersonic version in the final section 300 km. Considering that these are export options and the ZM-14E is also declared to be exported under 300 km, while outside the export it flies 1500 km in a high explosive version, that is, 5 times farther than the export version, then we assume ZM-54 in range under 1000 km, and ZM-54-1 (without a supersonic section) is also assumed to be close to 1500 km. Although the RGGS RCC should be heavier than with an IR-GOS or with a television camera, therefore, we expect to lose a couple of hundred kilometers, which is not essential in the anti-ship version. Also, when using a nuclear charge (unlike Tomahawk, it’s our main one), the range increases by about 1000 km (like Tomogavka itself), because a special charge of about 120-150 kg, and not a half-ton high-explosive bomb and the cast weight is less and more fuel can be taken. Therefore, the algorithm is simpler, there is no need to get on board, a hill is made, the target is captured, the missile defense decreases, leaving the horizon and undermining immediately after leaving the horizon so as not to give a chance to work out the air defense of the ship (connection). Actually, this is not new, the killers of aircraft carriers in the form of Antei and Tu22m3 used Granite and X-22, respectively, so as not to enter the PLA and AUG air defense zone, to launch anti-ship missiles, which carried half-megaton charge, and X-22 right up to the megaton charge. The calculation is correct, Antey could launch as many as 24 missiles, and Tu22M3 one or two and they would have to be detonated further, but also fly them further because air defense is always wider than antiaircraft defense.

[Alex777]

Great theorist! Not too lazy to write all this? Nothing at all. Till!

[hrych]

Great denier, Bye!

[alexmach]

On the RTO, in principle, there is nowhere to "shove" it, on Corvettes - there are no radar cells, on frigates - there are doubts that what is already in the Polyment-Reduta is working as it should, in all honesty, there is no exact data about this, only guesswork.

[hrych]

Quote: alexmach

On RTOs, in principle, there is nowhere to "shove" it

The same place where the Caliber was "shoved".

Quote: alexmach

no radars

An over-the-horizon missile missile does not require target illumination with a radar, according to the external target designation of an ARLO, ZGRLS aircraft, etc., the missile flies on an inertial, then the GOS in active mode captures and hits the target.

[voyaka uh]

Long-range missiles cannot be short in length. And it does not fit in small ships.
And missiles without radar are generally absurd. No wonder missile destroyers and frigates are building 50-100 thousand tons of displacement.

[hrych]

Quote: voyaka uh

And it does not fit in small ships.

But what about VPU 3S-14? It includes everything, 9 meters long, including the Caliber, and these things stand on Frigates 22350 and 11356, Corvettes 20385, Storozhevikah 11661, MRK 21631 and 22800.

Quote: voyaka uh

And missiles without radar are generally absurd.

Any MANPADS SAM does not have a radar, so what? SAM complex "Sosna-R" does not have a radar, but uses an optical-electronic control system (OESU) weapons. Absurd? In general, air-to-air missiles with IR-GOS, as well as with RGSN, can be launched on the OLS (which can be seen in the Su-35 at 80-90 km) and generally not use the aircraft's radar. We read works on firing missiles at over-the-horizon targets and weep, for some will soon not hide beyond the horizon, like the Anti-Lebanon and Lebanon ranges. And the 40N6 rocket, this is something new in the SAM, and of course, for some, the algorithm of such missiles does not fit in the head

Quote: voyaka uh

No wonder missile destroyers and frigates are building 50-100 thousand tons of displacement

Where do you get all this from? Today, a Frigate of the 2nd class is 2-4 thousand tons, a Frigate of the 1st class is 4-5 thousand tons of displacement. American destroyers Arly Burke from 6,6 to 9,6 thousand tons of displacement. Well, if 10 Arly Burke spliced ​​into a mouse king, then your dreams will come true.

[hrych]

Quote: voyaka uh

5-10 thousand. I had in mind, and you perfectly understood me

Well, the aircraft carrier Bush, with a displacement of 97 thousand tons, can be leveled at him

Quote: voyaka uh

Therefore, external target designation in the middle of the flight will help little.

External target designation gives the location and trajectory of the target and there is such a thing as anticipation, i.e. calculation of the meeting place with a view. There are also firing at catch-up and oncoming (counter-intersecting) courses. The missile is hypersonic, flies very quickly on the inertial (minute / one and a half at maximum range) and its inertia is very, very, and the steering wheels allow themselves to maneuver perfectly. It is still two-stage and it is not known how the second stage works, possibly even after capturing the target of its GOS. Naturally, in the place of the GOS capture, it dives onto the target from above, thereby expanding the radio horizon (the line of sight in the optical spectrum) and it has an IR detector combined with supposedly an IR detector so that no stealth is set.

[alexmach]

Long-range missiles cannot be short in length

And 5,6 meters (the longest according to Wikipedia is in service with a redoubt) is it short or long?

[the most important]

Quote: voyaka uh

No wonder rocket destroyers and frigates build 50-100 thousands of tons of displacement.

Oh, brother ... yes you are a complete ignoramus in shipbuilding !!. So in one word you can destroy your entire reputation ... A frigate of 100 thousand tons ???? Is he the size of an atomic aircraft carrier ???? They made fun .. They made fun ... You for this +!

[NEXUS]

Quote: voyaka uh

No wonder rocket destroyers and frigates build 50-100 thousands of tons of displacement.

A destroyer or a frigate of 50-100 thousand tons? Our heavy cruiser Peter the Great has less than 25 thousand tons of displacement.
And what kind of frigate of 100 thousand tons can you find out?

[goose]

Quote: voyaka uh

No wonder rocket destroyers and frigates build 50-100 thousands of tons of displacement.

More likely 4500-15000 thousand tons. now the range.
I agree, at least because of the dimensions of the installation and the size of the ammunition, the presence of long-range missiles with a range of more than 100 km is meaningless on small-tonnage ships.
However, for such missiles often indicate the maximum range achieved in the last phase with the engine inoperative when falling from the stratosphere, i.e. the real active part of the missile’s flight is 30–50% less; on the passive part of the trajectory, the possibilities of interception are very limited.
But ... shooting without precise target designation at ultra-long range is possible in the presence of target designation from the side.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: voyaka uh

No wonder rocket destroyers and frigates build 50-100 thousands of tons of displacement.

With a displacement you obviously got excited! 100 thousand tons is the AVM displacement !!! (Nimitz - 98 425t!)

[alexmach]

Over-the-horizon missile missiles do not require target illumination by radar

Yeah .. And the discovery of this very target before launch is still required? Or is it already possible without this too?

[hrych]

Quote: alexmach

Or is it already possible without this too?

It is possible, if there is an external target designation, for example, an AWACS or ZGRLS aircraft is operating. For example, Polyana-D4 can control 4 divisions S-300 (S-400) and Bukami, receiving target designation directly from the A-50 aircraft. Now, the RTOs do not need to see the target themselves, they receive external data and send missiles to the meeting point, this was worked out on December 16, 2016, RTOs in the Caspian Sea, when the planes hiding behind the radio horizon were fixed by ZGRLS and the coordinates were transmitted to the RTOs, which with its modest SAMs repelled the attack, and missiles can only be with IR-GOS, i.e. no illumination of the target by the radar is required at all, for example, Needle and Bending.

[Arikkhab]

Something all in a bunch ... And over-the-horizon target designation, and PZPK Needle ...

[hrych]

Quote: ArikKhab

Something all in a bunch ... And over-the-horizon target designation, and PZPK Needle ...

No heap. In the Caspian, RTOs armed only with a Bend with optical guidance, and which uses the SAM (Verba) missile, which is not a variant of MANPADS, but at the Gibka stationary installation, by external target designation of the ZGRLS Sunflower, repelled a conditional attack from the air. This was the first time that the air defense missile defense system imposed air defense. RTO, although it has a very good radar (Positive), but can’t look beyond the horizon, but the Sunflower can also calculate the air defense of an RTO, knew when and where an airplane or aircraft would jump out of the horizon, then it’s a matter of technology. RTOs are not yet armed with missiles with the RGSN, but only missiles with the IR-GOS. Well, anti-aircraft gun mount Duet. Therefore, there is no contradiction.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Andrey Chistyakov

And you see how it happened.

He is with the company, they convinced me the day before yesterday that our fleet is degrading, along with the Air Force. Specialists of the highest level

[Andrey Chistyakov]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Quote: Andrey Chistyakov

And you see how it happened.

He is with the company, they convinced me the day before yesterday that our fleet is degrading, along with the Air Force. Specialists of the highest level

Yes, not the right word ...

[Sandor Clegane]

Quote: Andrey Chistyakov

Yes ... They did not promise with Crimea. And did not plan. And you see how it happened.

but they didn’t say the same thing about the piece of the Barents Sea and islands on the Amur, and the bam no longer belongs to us

[ioan-e]

Yes ... They did not promise with Crimea. And did not plan. And you see how it happened.

Yes! And they didn’t promise with pension, but how it turned out!
PS And something is very scary about the Kuril Islands!

[Narak-zempo]

Quote: ioan-e

PS And something is very scary about the Kuril Islands!

Remember, from a national song:
"The Ridge will not get
Samurai never ... "

[Alexander Romanov]

Fleet degradation on the face.

[gunnerminer]

Set. They talk about arming the super destroyer with hypersonic ammunition. They will soon show the cartoon.

[Andrey Chistyakov]

Quote: gunnerminer

Set. They talk about arming the super destroyer with hypersonic ammunition. They will soon show the cartoon.

In Syria, the barmaley have seen enough of "cartoons". Before death. Their last wish was. What cartoon? One word. "Caliber".

[gunnerminer]

Your main enemies are by no means barmalei. They do not threaten the combat readiness of strategic nuclear forces.

-One word. "Caliber".-

The caliber is magnificent against an adversary that does not have modern fighters, air defense, electronic warfare. Yes, and the barmels after crushing volleys of the caliber complex Caliber repeatedly delivered tangible blows to the Persians and hezbollons.

[Andrey Chistyakov]

Quote: gunnerminer

Your main enemies are by no means barmalei. They do not threaten the combat readiness of strategic nuclear forces.

-One word. "Caliber".-

The caliber is magnificent against an adversary that does not have modern fighters, air defense, electronic warfare. Yes, and the barmels after crushing volleys of the caliber complex Caliber repeatedly delivered tangible blows to the Persians and hezbollons.

You re-read yourself. You wrote the first about the "cartoon". I answered you. Nobody believed that we had cruise missiles. USA in the first place. Now they also do not believe in "Vanguard" and "Dagger". Flag in their hands.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: gunnerminer

Skro cartoon show.

They will show, show. So they will show that in the EU and the USA, the demand for bunkers will increase. In Russia, they don’t know how to do anything, but Muradik

[gunnerminer]

- they don’t know how to do anything, yes Muradik
Modern ammunition is more for cartoons. Other things are done at a teal-pace, expensive, and with tails of criminal cases.

[Gray brother]

Quote: gunnerminer

.Skro cartoon show.

Gunya, the cartoon is this:

[gunnerminer]

This cartoon on the media can not be shoved. For draftees from the slums of Toronto.

[nesvobodnye]

I agree. Mosfilm does not sleep.
We started from the Crimean bridge, then Putin’s order for new weapons was fulfilled, and now we got to the destroyer.
Horror! Today, Russia is dying especially hard.
/sarcasm/

[AnderS]

not, today Rogozin said that a little bit more and apple trees will bloom on the moon ...

[Old26]

I liked the expression more

According to the developers, the missile will be capable of hitting cruise and ballistic missiles, drones, and shoot down deck attack aircraft directly above an aircraft carrier.

Well, with drones, ballistic and aerodynamic targets, everything is clear. Interestingly, the developers are aware that this frigate corvette is unlikely to be tolerated by such a distance to the aircraft carrier. The technological reserve for 40N6 is certainly good, but the dimensions for 40N6 and 9M96 and 9M100 are different ...

[tlauicol]

Do they even fit into a corvette?
Oh, these storytellers

[Machito]

The aircraft carrier itself will be afraid to approach our corvettes and MRK.

[Photon]

And why at such a distance to approach the aircraft carrier? This rocket will just get the AWACS plane

[Anton Yu]

So the complex was generally accepted or not?

[kjhg]

Quote: Anton Yu

So the complex was generally accepted or not?

I didn’t see such messages, but judging by the fact that Gorshkov was accepted into service ...
And the fact that the distant arm will appear even among frigates and corvettes is a big plus.

[alexmach]

Well, Gorshkov was accepted.

[rocket757]

Yes "powerful", yes promising! The only question is the saturation of air defense systems covering ships, navy, with such systems.

[loki565]

And what are subsonic air defense missiles ??? and whom do they hit, cornmen ???))

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: loki565

And what are subsonic air defense missiles ??? and whom do they hit, cornmen ???))

You will laugh. Happen! More precisely, they were once. Naturally, in Britain. About 50 years ago, Tiger Cat and Sea Cat. This Sea Cat in the Falklands distinguished himself by not knocking down a single Argentine plane.

[Wiruz]

The mass-dimensional characteristics of this rocket are interesting. If the diameter is like 40H6, then the question again will be about the possibility of placing four 9M96 missiles in each cell. Then our ships, if not in quality, then at least in number of missiles, will be ahead of the rest ...
Oh, those dreams ...

[faiver]

Well, God forbid that it has grown together

[Chicha squad]

Such a big cell and such a small hole in it.

[rruvim]

... as well as shoot down deck attack aircraft directly above the aircraft carrier.

Maybe the carrier itself is easier ...
And how to "highlight" an aerodynamic target over an aircraft carrier at a distance of 300-400 km?

[jonht]

A simple, active three range homing head. We definitely have two ...

[tlauicol]

But how do you know that an airplane took off from AB? and indeed, where is he, this AB?

[jonht]

The deployment of the space group Liana let it go slowly, but she will blow the data. At the moment, there are no rockets yet, they are in development.

[Genry]

Quote: Tlauicol

Where is he, this AB?

All aircraft carriers are constantly underway. When I served, I saw brief telegrams, with the movement of all active.

[Kaw]

Does this mean that the S-350 complex will have the same characteristics?

[Wiruz]

You can forget about the S-350. He died without being born

[sivuch]

Quote: Andrey Chistyakov

Quote: gunnerminer

About the promised ammunition messages are built on speculation and elements of bragging.

- They did not promise with Crimea. And did not plan-

Gooseberry is in the garden, and aunt is in Ashkelon.

Hello aunt ....

Gunya whistles. There are no aunts in Ashkelon.
I go to Ashkelon to work

[Old26]

Quote: Bearded

The aircraft carrier itself will be afraid to approach our corvettes and MRK.

Aha! Have you already prepared the hats to throw them over the AUG? The radius of the AUG order is approximately 100 km. The patrol (air), armed, by the way, like AWACS aircraft, is located at a distance of about 400-500 km from the aircraft carrier. And who will be afraid to approach whom? corvettes-frigates in the amount of one or two units to the AUG or AUG to this "group" ...

Quote: kjhg

Quote: Anton Yu

So the complex was generally accepted or not?

I didn’t see such messages, but judging by the fact that Gorshkov was accepted into service ...
And the fact that the distant arm will appear even among frigates and corvettes is a big plus.

"Gorshkov" was accepted. With or without comments on the anti-aircraft missile system - KhZ. But this complex does not yet have a "distant missile" at all. It will be and when is unknown. Especially when you consider that almost 400 years passed from the moment the S-10 complex was put on the BD, before the "long-range" 40N6 was adopted, then maybe in 10 years, by 2030, the "Polyment-Redut" will acquire a "long-range missile" ". Moreover, the dimensions of the S-400 and Polyment-Redut missiles are different. And it will not work to "shove" a 40N6 rocket into this complex. So it will be necessary to make a new one. And it's not a fact that this new one will have such a range ...

Quote: Captain Pushkin

You will laugh. Happen! More precisely, they were once. Naturally, in Britain. About 50 years ago, Tiger Cat and Sea Cat. This Sea Cat in the Falklands distinguished himself by not knocking down a single Argentine plane.

Well, these missiles, let’s say so closer to MANPADS than to serious complexes. And their goals then did not differ at special speeds.

Quote: Wiruz

The mass-dimensional characteristics of this rocket are interesting. If the diameter is like 40H6, then the question again will be about the possibility of placing four 9M96 missiles in each cell. Then our ships, if not in quality, then at least in number of missiles, will be ahead of the rest ...
Oh, those dreams ...

The Polyment-Redut complex is a variant of the Vityaz complex, which has been overshadowed by EMNIP. And no 40H6 will fit into this cell even with a very strong desire. calculation for missiles of the class 9M96 and 9M100, but not for "large missiles of the S-400 complex ...

Quote: jonht

The deployment of the space group Liana let it go slowly, but she will blow the data. At the moment, there are no rockets yet, they are in development.

In order for it to "extract" data, it is necessary to deploy a large enough grouping, and not from 4 "Lotuses" and one "Peony" (which is not yet in orbit). Even the Soviet system of apparatuses, incl. and with nuclear reactors could not "Cover" the entire water area of ​​the oceans. Only part of it. And when "Liana" will be able to give something concretely in the allowable time interval - no one knows

Quote: Genry

All aircraft carriers are constantly underway. When I served, I saw brief telegrams, with the movement of all active.

Yes, when there was a fleet reconnaissance aircraft. And now? How many aircraft carriers and at what distance are tracked if reconnaissance aircraft are at a minimum?

[Arikkhab]

Long-range is understandable ... But "supersonic"? Aren't SAM missiles by definition supersonic?

[Avior]

the English, I remember, had an exotic in the form of subsonic, but in general you are right, now there simply are no others.

[fa2998]

Quote: voyaka uh

Long-range missiles cannot be short in length. And it does not fit in small ships.
And missiles without radar are generally absurd. No wonder missile destroyers and frigates are building 50-100 thousand tons of displacement.

Well, you went too far! 100 thousand tons are built by aircraft carriers. For the destroyer 8-10 thousand

[Avior]

as I understand it, no one has ever seen not only evidence, but even statements or simple statements from officials that Polement-Redoubt shot with anything other than the 9M100.
And what about Polement’s problem of transferring a target from one HEADLIGHT to another? Not a word came across either.

[Wiruz]

Sterilized. A couple of years ago, he shot 9M96 from the side of the corvette, recently from Gorshkov. The latter seemed to even shoot 9M96M. But is it successful ... They won’t tell us about it

[box9603]

Ahaha
The funniest thing about this news is there is NO such news on the news.
There are 2 articles side by side: about a long-range marine missile based on a 40n6 missile and about Poliment-Redoubt.
As a result, on topvar, news in the form of soup from various news as a result of the editor’s life.
It remains to be glad that there were no articles on the news, for example, about Armata and the Dagger. There would be a bomb cover break from the topvar.