Gaddafi continues the war with his murderers and from the next world ...
More than 7 months have passed since the day that the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was killed. The bloody massacre of the colonel, who became like a bone across the throat for American and European leaders, divided the world into two sides. Some shouted in delight and almost in an animal frenzy of intractable joy and euphoria, others understood that the destruction of Gaddafi should be treated as a real crime, which by all means must be investigated. Russia, the Amnesty International organization, as well as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, called upon to investigate the murder of the Libyan leader in his hometown of Sirte. It would seem that the new Libyan authorities should be seriously active in order to punish the perpetrators, but no matter how ... So far, no sensible attempt has been made to launch a real investigation based on the letter of criminal law. Not only that, the other day from the US Department of State it was reported that the Transitional National Council today has affairs and is more important than conducting an investigation of a resonant murder. Such words were uttered by the Deputy US Secretary of State Michael Posner. In addition, Mr. Posner said that during 42 of the reign of Muammar Gaddafi all democratic institutions of Libya were destroyed, which means that the new authorities of the North African state will have to roll up their sleeves and begin the process of forming a new prosperous country.
By the way, it is quite remarkable that it is the representative of the US Foreign Ministry who makes excuses to the PNS about why 7, after more than a month after the death of Colonel Gaddafi, the investigation of this case does not get off the ground. This proves once again who will be least interested in such an investigation today.
In this regard, such a question comes up to the surface: were those people who had dealt with Gaddafi in front of camera lenses ordered not to take the colonel alive or the killing of the Libyan leader can be called an accident or even negligence? After the passage of time, looking through the footage before the moment of the murder and immediately after it, the feeling that this bloody massacre was encouraged, as they say, from above, does not leave. People who dragged Gaddafi’s bloody hair through the city’s streets clearly understood that with Gaddafi virtually anything could be done. No instructions “To take alive and judge by democratic laws”, obviously, did not exist, and therefore the frenzied crowd turned human blood into a world show. But if so, then in the murder of Gaddafi there are not only performers, but also clear customers. Who are these people, from whose, shall we say, the tacit consent of the captive Gaddafi, killed in front of hundreds of people gathered around?
There is a fairly stable opinion on this score, according to which this so-called Franco-American coalition, headed by Sarkozy and Obama. The briefness of the capture and the murder that followed it gives food for thought that there was a peculiar principle among the Libyan rebel terrorists - not to stand on ceremony with Gaddafi and to do everything so that he “did not get” to the hospital.
Obviously, this situation was on hand and Sarkozy, and Obama. Sensational story On the sponsorship of the Gaddafi family, Nicolas Sarkozy at the presidential election is a clear confirmation of this. And although the ex-president of France himself declares that all these documents on the allocation of multi-million aid for his election victory are fake, but the world is increasingly inclined to believe the documents provided, and not Sarkozy’s words about his honesty and integrity. At the same time, his defeat in the presidential election 2012 makes it possible to think that without a dictator’s money, as Gaddafi himself called Sarkozy, it’s impossible to win against Monsieur Nicolas. In this regard, we can add that if captured Gaddafi’s October 20 captured in October remained alive, the story of “winning millions” for Sarkozy would have long been not a matter of discussion, but reliable information for all 2011%. At the same time, one should not forget that the son of Colonel Gaddafi Seif al Islam spoke about sponsoring Sarkozy at the elections.
Apparently, the very zeal of the then French leader to eliminate his sponsor so that he would not give the world a terrible secret about the background of his victory in the presidential election - this is one of the reasons for the beginning of the great Libyan massacre, which today has developed into a full-scale civil war. But let's not forget that today in France an investigation is being conducted into the fact of the authenticity of the materials that were published in the media and shed light on the financial assistance from Muammar Gaddafi. And if such an investigation leads to the fact that the authenticity of the documents and, accordingly, the veracity of the words of Saif al Islam, will be confirmed, then Sarkozy himself may be behind bars.
In other words, the case of the murder of Colonel Gaddafi openly descends on brakes in Libya, but a person who could to some extent become the customer of this massacre is quite clearly waiting for the dock if the French decide to go for a real judicial investigation, and not to conceal information. In this case, it will be possible to consider a fair date for Sarkozy in connection with the fact that he paid the coin to Muammar Gaddafi.
However, if it concerns only the desire of Sarkozy to cover his tracks with Libyan sponsorship, then why did the Americans actively support the operation? After all, as recently as 2009, at the General Assembly, Muammar Gaddafi called on Obama to be made president for life of the United States, because he is the son of Africa. Many saw in the words of Gaddafi slyness and hints of recent intra-American investigations, in which rumors began to come to the surface more and more often that Obama was not born in Honolulu (Hawaii, USA), but in Kenya. Obama's entourage denies this information. Still, if everything is as Gaddafi hinted at in his time, it turns out that Obama could not at all become president of the United States. And after all, corrosive journalists continue today (obviously not without interest from Republicans) to look for the “Kenyan” imprint on the Obama presidency. One can imagine what will happen if, like in France, before the presidential elections, compromising such a type of evidence appears on the Barack Obama. In this regard, he, too, can not just lose the election, but also be in the dock.
Let's not forget that today the trial is under way over another person who gave the order to bomb the Libyan cities - Silvio Berlusconi. Berlusconi is being persecuted not only in the case of sexual intimacy with a minor confused Karima Al-Mahrug (Ruby), but also in connection with the embezzlement of money from the state treasury to organize sexual games in his villa. The Italians in Arabic-born Karimea also saw a peculiar Libyan trace. If there is at least some connection, then the situation takes on a truly mystical hue: it turns out that those who participated in the overthrowing and killing of Gaddafi may soon expect a dock and a real prison sentence. Truly, Gaddafi continues the war with his murderers from the next world ...
By the way, it is quite remarkable that it is the representative of the US Foreign Ministry who makes excuses to the PNS about why 7, after more than a month after the death of Colonel Gaddafi, the investigation of this case does not get off the ground. This proves once again who will be least interested in such an investigation today.
In this regard, such a question comes up to the surface: were those people who had dealt with Gaddafi in front of camera lenses ordered not to take the colonel alive or the killing of the Libyan leader can be called an accident or even negligence? After the passage of time, looking through the footage before the moment of the murder and immediately after it, the feeling that this bloody massacre was encouraged, as they say, from above, does not leave. People who dragged Gaddafi’s bloody hair through the city’s streets clearly understood that with Gaddafi virtually anything could be done. No instructions “To take alive and judge by democratic laws”, obviously, did not exist, and therefore the frenzied crowd turned human blood into a world show. But if so, then in the murder of Gaddafi there are not only performers, but also clear customers. Who are these people, from whose, shall we say, the tacit consent of the captive Gaddafi, killed in front of hundreds of people gathered around?
There is a fairly stable opinion on this score, according to which this so-called Franco-American coalition, headed by Sarkozy and Obama. The briefness of the capture and the murder that followed it gives food for thought that there was a peculiar principle among the Libyan rebel terrorists - not to stand on ceremony with Gaddafi and to do everything so that he “did not get” to the hospital.
Obviously, this situation was on hand and Sarkozy, and Obama. Sensational story On the sponsorship of the Gaddafi family, Nicolas Sarkozy at the presidential election is a clear confirmation of this. And although the ex-president of France himself declares that all these documents on the allocation of multi-million aid for his election victory are fake, but the world is increasingly inclined to believe the documents provided, and not Sarkozy’s words about his honesty and integrity. At the same time, his defeat in the presidential election 2012 makes it possible to think that without a dictator’s money, as Gaddafi himself called Sarkozy, it’s impossible to win against Monsieur Nicolas. In this regard, we can add that if captured Gaddafi’s October 20 captured in October remained alive, the story of “winning millions” for Sarkozy would have long been not a matter of discussion, but reliable information for all 2011%. At the same time, one should not forget that the son of Colonel Gaddafi Seif al Islam spoke about sponsoring Sarkozy at the elections.
Apparently, the very zeal of the then French leader to eliminate his sponsor so that he would not give the world a terrible secret about the background of his victory in the presidential election - this is one of the reasons for the beginning of the great Libyan massacre, which today has developed into a full-scale civil war. But let's not forget that today in France an investigation is being conducted into the fact of the authenticity of the materials that were published in the media and shed light on the financial assistance from Muammar Gaddafi. And if such an investigation leads to the fact that the authenticity of the documents and, accordingly, the veracity of the words of Saif al Islam, will be confirmed, then Sarkozy himself may be behind bars.
In other words, the case of the murder of Colonel Gaddafi openly descends on brakes in Libya, but a person who could to some extent become the customer of this massacre is quite clearly waiting for the dock if the French decide to go for a real judicial investigation, and not to conceal information. In this case, it will be possible to consider a fair date for Sarkozy in connection with the fact that he paid the coin to Muammar Gaddafi.
However, if it concerns only the desire of Sarkozy to cover his tracks with Libyan sponsorship, then why did the Americans actively support the operation? After all, as recently as 2009, at the General Assembly, Muammar Gaddafi called on Obama to be made president for life of the United States, because he is the son of Africa. Many saw in the words of Gaddafi slyness and hints of recent intra-American investigations, in which rumors began to come to the surface more and more often that Obama was not born in Honolulu (Hawaii, USA), but in Kenya. Obama's entourage denies this information. Still, if everything is as Gaddafi hinted at in his time, it turns out that Obama could not at all become president of the United States. And after all, corrosive journalists continue today (obviously not without interest from Republicans) to look for the “Kenyan” imprint on the Obama presidency. One can imagine what will happen if, like in France, before the presidential elections, compromising such a type of evidence appears on the Barack Obama. In this regard, he, too, can not just lose the election, but also be in the dock.
Let's not forget that today the trial is under way over another person who gave the order to bomb the Libyan cities - Silvio Berlusconi. Berlusconi is being persecuted not only in the case of sexual intimacy with a minor confused Karima Al-Mahrug (Ruby), but also in connection with the embezzlement of money from the state treasury to organize sexual games in his villa. The Italians in Arabic-born Karimea also saw a peculiar Libyan trace. If there is at least some connection, then the situation takes on a truly mystical hue: it turns out that those who participated in the overthrowing and killing of Gaddafi may soon expect a dock and a real prison sentence. Truly, Gaddafi continues the war with his murderers from the next world ...
Information