Military Review

Russian Navy enriched with two "Raptors"

50
At the St. Petersburg enterprise "Pella" with a short break passed the transfer ceremony the fleet two Raptor patrol boats (project 03160), reports TASS.




The place of service of one of them will be the Baltic Fleet, the other - the Caspian Flotilla.

According to the invoice, they became 13 and 14 boats, built in accordance with the contract of the Ministry of Defense for the supply of 14 units to the fleet, the BF press service reported.

The order has been completely fulfilled, the boats are distributed between the Black Sea, Baltic fleets and the Caspian flotilla.

As noted in the Russian military, in the future the construction of these boats will be continued.

Recall, "Raptors" are designed to patrol the coastal zone in the ice-free navigation period at any time of the day at a distance of 100 miles from the base. May be part of the BDK, UDC with accommodation on board or in the docking chamber.

The main tasks also include ensuring the security of ships on unprotected raids, intercepting and detaining small targets, delivering troops (up to 20 people) with full weapons, and participating in search and rescue operations.

The speed of the boat - up to 48 nodes (depending on the height of the waves). Armed with a fighting module "Uprada-Kord" with a large-caliber machine gun (14,5 mm) and two machine guns "Pecheneg" caliber 7,62 mm.
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
50 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Svarog
    Svarog 12 October 2018 17: 38
    +11
    Around one raptors, the previous news about the American raptor was .. the American name should be excluded ..
    1. Don Quixote
      Don Quixote 12 October 2018 17: 47
      +6
      The place of service of one of them will be the Baltic Fleet, the other - the Caspian Flotilla.

      And why not the Sea of ​​Azov? There it’s time to have fun with Bandera ...
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 12 October 2018 17: 57
        +5
        Well, if you take the Raptors as striking power, then most likely Bandera will kill the Raptors sad .

        There even without Gyurz - PSKR Donbass (205P with Furuno and retrofitted with several DShK) and 2 Grifa will break the Raptors.


        Overkil for any Bandera plans on Azov will be MAKi 21630 (Astrakhan, Makhachkala and Volgodonsk).
        1. hrych
          hrych 12 October 2018 18: 05
          +3
          Quote: donavi49
          Well, if you take the Raptors as striking power, then most likely Bandera will kill the Raptors

          Well, straight zrada, there is no overshoot wassat
          Quote: donavi49
          MAKI 21630
          This is the Caspian flotilla, and in the Black Sea basin Karakurts will dominate - small missile ships of project 22800 and Frigates of project 11356Р / М, code "Petrel", and also Bora and Samum, and also ... Something fat for ukroarmada wassat
          1. donavi49
            donavi49 12 October 2018 19: 06
            +3
            Toothy Buyans (from UKKS) and 22800 (which for the Black Sea Fleet went to 2020 because the engines went to + 1 year) - is still possible.

            Frigates - why? If he leaves the fairway, then he will have to pull off the Black Sea Fleet with all his strength. This is the Sea of ​​Azov.

            But the main goal. Bandera’s people have the flagship of frontier guards of Donbass (a strong unit for 205P) + 2 Grifa. Everything is on the go and regularly used in exercises.

            Now there are still Gyurza - but this is the Navy (that is, a different level of tension - but the Raptors are also the Navy).

            Plus a lot of small boats with machine guns.

            All this is counteracted by all kinds of toothy Fireflies with AK-176, new Fireflies / 22460 with AK-306 / 630.

            As the strength of the fleet, it is the new MAKs that are the most logical. For they have the optimal composition of weapons for actions for those goals that the other side has on Azov. Plus, it is adapted to work in shallow water.

            With GFL, one Grif has already been transferred for Azov (so that parity is with Bandera) and 2 Bumblebee. But Bumblebee is not very optimal for those purposes. Tower with PT-76 + 25mm iron-guided assault rifle = this is not the parity of 205P and Gyurzam.
          2. gunnerminer
            gunnerminer 12 October 2018 19: 19
            -1
            The average depth on the Sea of ​​Azov is 7 meters. laughing
            1. hrych
              hrych 12 October 2018 23: 28
              -1
              You don’t have to go to the middle depth. It’s like in tanks, the tank should not fight against the tank, this is nonsense, also here, the boat should not fight with the boat, there is aviation and anti-ship missiles. RTOs, etc., do not go boarding, receive target designation either externally or with their own radar and pelvis at the bottom. Moreover, it is not necessary to enter Azov. And of course the Coast Balls with the same X-35. Its modification is ship Uranus, aviation, including helicopters. Ukrainians have no chances. And missile ships like Bora and Samum, generally with a draft of 3 meters, and with air injection in general 1 meter. They have artillery and powerful Mosquitoes, and the striking power of the destroyer level.
              1. Lara Croft
                Lara Croft 13 October 2018 02: 55
                +2
                Quote: hrych
                It's like in tanks the tank must not fight against the tank, that's bullshit,

                Why is he needed then? And apparently our grandfathers were engaged in nonsense on the "Kursk Bulge" in the Second World War ...
                TANK
                (English tank), fully armored. high-cross-country tracked combat vehicle with a powerful cannon, usually in a rotating turret, designed primarily for direct fire. At present. T. weight 46 - 62 tons, thickness of frontal armor 500 - 600 mm, max. speed 60 - 70 km / h, stabilized 120mm or 125mm cannon, high level of automation and computerization of combat processes. They are a mass weapon: even after mutual reductions by 2000 NATO and the Russian Federation will have about 20 thousand tons each (13 thousand in the USA, 4,2 thousand in Germany, 1,3 thousand in France, 1,15 thousand in Great Britain. ). Main elements of T .: hull with turret, armament complex, power plant with a capacity of up to 1500 hp, transmission, chassis, communications. Has a system of protection against weapons of mass destruction, equipment for underwater driving, zen. means, and others. The first T. was created in 1916 in Great Britain and France (in September of the same year, the British first used T. on the battlefield). The origin of edema. tank building dates back to 1920. By the beginning. Conducted. Otech. war created numerous. tank. fleet (about 16 thousand cars), the basis of which was made up of light T-26 and BT and adopted for service in December. 1939 Wed T-34 (1229) and heavy. KV-1 (636). Modern swelling T. T-80UD, T-90 and T-80U (rez-t modernization, respectively, T-64A, T-72 and T-80) differ from foreign ones (American "Abrams", German "Leopard", English. " Challenger "and French" Leclerc ") with a smaller silhouette and weight, better driving characteristics, the presence of controls. weapons and automatic loader, however, they are inferior to them in instrumentation and armor protection.

                http://encyclopedia.mil.ru/encyclopedia/dictionary/[email protected]
                Dictionary from the site of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation ...
                What kind of experts you will not hear here .....
                1. hrych
                  hrych 13 October 2018 21: 07
                  0
                  They fought against tanks with special anti-tank weapons, from anti-tank rifles to self-propelled guns. The diocese of attack aircraft also included the fight against armored vehicles. Self-propelled guns were called St. John's wort unofficially. For German tanks and self-propelled guns had bestial names. Tanks directly replaced cavalry. And their main task is what the cavalry did, of course, given the increase in military power. But nonetheless. If you are wise beyond your years, you also let out angry snot by quoting their Vicki. So here they are for you because you did not finish to the end, apparently there was not enough patience. Feature and objectives of the Cavalry:
                  The ability to conduct independent actions in a significant separation from their troops, to overcome long distances in a short time, to suddenly appear on the flanks and behind enemy lines, quickly unfold for battle ... The American Civil War of 1861-1865 showed that with proper combat training cavalry is still able to successfully conduct combat operations and in the conditions of the use of rifled firearms, especially to carry out deep raids on the rear and communications of the enemy.
                  On tanks: the use of tanks is most effective - tank formations are introduced into the area where the enemy’s defense is breached, and due to the combination of their high mobility, firepower and considerable autonomy, they can advance deep into the territory occupied by the enemy, cutting supply routes, destroying military infrastructure, destroying headquarters and communications centers, blocking nodal elements (such as fork in the road). In favorable conditions, tank formations can make the environment of the enemy. Those. if I had the patience, I would have understood briefly that the task of the tanks was to break through to the rear, cut supply communications (to smash convoys in case of cavalry), and the environment. Once again for the slow-witted: Flanks, Breakthrough, Cut communications, Environment. There are also secondary tasks such as infantry support, which are extremely secondary. And if tanks went to tanks, then the commander must be shot, or rather both. So stupid intelligence and planning error. This happened under Prokhorovka. Both Rotmistrov and Hausser had to be shot for mediocrity. Actually Rotmistrov from the tribunal was saved by the intercession of Vasilevsky and the general course of the Kursk Bulge. And not that he suffered heavy losses in the battle, but that this battle took place altogether because his task was to break into the flank and destroy communications and collapse into a lobeshnik. Especially now, with the development of anti-tank weapons, an infantryman with ATGM is capable of hitting a tank from a greater distance than a tank can hit with direct fire, an example of the same Javelin. There are anti-tank helicopters and attack aircraft, and hitting from tank to tank with direct fire is simply stupid and, again, can happen due to the complete mediocrity of the commander or in the absence of other means, which is also stupidity and crime.
                  1. Lara Croft
                    Lara Croft 13 October 2018 21: 15
                    +2
                    hrych (Hrych) They fought against tanks with special anti-tank weapons, from anti-tank rifles to self-propelled guns. The diocese of attack aircraft also included the fight against armored vehicles.

                    And then why are tanks needed? And apparently on the Kursk Bulge they were hiding from each other?
                    1. hrych
                      hrych 13 October 2018 21: 30
                      0
                      I tell you again. To hit the flanks, make a breakthrough, smash the rear, cut communications and the most bonus is the enemy’s surroundings. This is what cavalry did before, but which machine guns crossed out. Tanks with their armor defended themselves from machine-gun fire while solving the same problems (especially at the dawn of tank building, when the tanks themselves were armed only with machine guns) as the cavalry. If a tank (tank connection) ran into a tank (tank connection), then the task of breaking through, hitting the flank and, of course, raiding the rear and especially the environment, has already been initially failed. Well, they will kill each other, even the winner will suffer unacceptable losses and the hell will not solve the further problem. So actually it happened under Prokhorovka that those that failed completely. They hung each other and all. This is not a knightly tournament to smack one another in the forehead, but a maneuverable war however. A tank is an instrument of maneuver warfare.
                      1. igorka357
                        igorka357 14 October 2018 10: 27
                        0
                        Tanks, flanks ... rear? Yeah ... tanks with enemy rear, this is to the point of grunt!
            2. Sergey Goncharov
              Sergey Goncharov 13 October 2018 04: 33
              0
              The average depth on the Sea of ​​Azov is 7 meters

              There are even estimates that as much as 8 m !! laughing
        2. Alexander Galaktionov
          Alexander Galaktionov 12 October 2018 18: 20
          0
          With Raptor, you can shoot cornet on gyurza
          1. gunnerminer
            gunnerminer 12 October 2018 19: 20
            -2
            If the wave height allows you to keep the Cornet in the direction of the enemy. Sometimes it shakes on the wave. wassat
            1. Alexander Galaktionov
              Alexander Galaktionov 12 October 2018 19: 28
              0
              With a gyroscopic setup and the wave is not a hindrance smile
        3. Alexander Galaktionov
          Alexander Galaktionov 12 October 2018 18: 34
          0
          [media = http: // https: //www.youtube.com/watch? time_continue = 5 & v = 4tNCowTU4sA] Yes, the 404 naval border bars are still the same smile
      2. Tersky
        Tersky 12 October 2018 20: 04
        +1
        Quote: Don Quixote
        And why not the Sea of ​​Azov

        winked Do we have the Azov Navy there? The Sea of ​​Azov is the northeastern lateral basin of the Black Sea, with which it is connected by the Kerch Strait. Now back to the news and carefully read:
        The order has been completely fulfilled, the boats are distributed between the Black Sea, Baltic fleets and the Caspian flotilla.
        and draw the appropriate conclusions.
        1. Lara Croft
          Lara Croft 13 October 2018 02: 58
          +3
          Quote: Tersky
          Quote: Don Quixote
          And why not the Sea of ​​Azov

          winked Do we have the Azov Navy there? The Sea of ​​Azov is the northeastern lateral basin of the Black Sea, with which it is connected by the Kerch Strait. Now back to the news and carefully read:
          The order has been completely fulfilled, the boats are distributed between the Black Sea, Baltic fleets and the Caspian flotilla.
          и draw appropriate conclusions[i] [/ i].

          This is impossible, in the absence of knowledge of geography at the level of a comprehensive school .... fellow
    2. Lara Croft
      Lara Croft 12 October 2018 18: 20
      +8
      Quote: Svarog
      Around one raptors, the previous news about the American raptor was .. the American name should be excluded ..

      The last news was about a new English aircraft carrier, which everyone laughed at, another thing is the construction of 2 boats by us ...
    3. Berkut24
      Berkut24 12 October 2018 18: 42
      +2
      Around one raptors

      Remember this day October 12th - Raptor Day. Russia +2, USA-1.
    4. Misha Honest
      Misha Honest 13 October 2018 00: 36
      +1
      The Chinese build packs of destroyers, cruisers and aircraft carriers. Pin-ups are built in packs of destroyers and aircraft carriers ... The Russians build in packs only boats ... laughing - How to prepare for war in different countries ...
      Arctic fox - there is nothing more to say. fool good
    5. snake
      snake 13 October 2018 08: 38
      -1
      Quote: Svarog
      Around one raptors, the previous news about the American raptor was .. the American name should be excluded ..

      In vain. Names like "raptor", "predator" and "hippo" give -100 to the enemy's morale. These are proven and reliable means of pressure on the psyche of the enemy. laughing
  2. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 12 October 2018 17: 42
    +2
    here are a dozen of them built exclusively for the Sea of ​​Azov, only to arm harder-ptrk and pzrk necessarily mount.
    1. Non liberoid Russian
      Non liberoid Russian 12 October 2018 17: 52
      -1
      Well, certainly the sofa urakryalku at the headquarters of the Navy
      1. Lara Croft
        Lara Croft 12 October 2018 18: 21
        +2
        Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
        Well, certainly the sofa urakryalku at the headquarters of the Navy

        how are you talking to the general?
      2. ANCIENT
        ANCIENT 12 October 2018 18: 27
        +2
        not roofing material am - better comment on the article, or on the topic I see nothing to say fool fool
        1. Non liberoid Russian
          Non liberoid Russian 16 October 2018 10: 25
          0
          illiteracy of the village was drawn ... more emoticons, more, more noticeable .. and start to look after yourself ... I didn’t see your comments on the case, except for cheers
    2. Vladimir 5
      Vladimir 5 12 October 2018 17: 54
      0
      In the navy, 14,5 mm is nowhere, only to your own fright when meeting even with a class enemy ... Better to put at least 30 mm, the salvo is completely different, and the enemy will bypass ... Immediately need to arm, later re-arm it may be too late ... I remembered the statement of the specialist, - "The Raptor does not need a caliber anymore" ... He forgot that there is no weapon "for a lot", there is only "for a little" with sad consequences ...
      1. marshes
        marshes 12 October 2018 18: 16
        +1
        Quote: Vladimir 5
        In the fleet, 14,5 mm is nowhere,

        14.5 maybe the most, here on the site there were photos of ruptures of duralumin sheathing on helicopters, creepy. But many boats are made of duralumin and expensive fiberglass-glass.
        1. Vladimir 5
          Vladimir 5 12 October 2018 18: 21
          +1
          And if it’s not from duralumin and it’s armored and a cannon with more caliber will get it from far away, Kord only rumbles powerlessly, not delivering ..... Yes, and helicopters get farther than Kord ... Again the same; There are never too many weapons ...
          1. marshes
            marshes 12 October 2018 18: 26
            +3
            Quote: Vladimir 5
            There are never too many weapons ...

            The league would not be drawn to the bottom.
            In general, the Raptor, a concept like that for hidden movement, DRG, why does he need a loud weapon. But the NSV or Kord, as I understand it, is the weapon of last chance. A speed of 48 knots is not bad, even for a helicopter it will be difficult to intercept.
            1. Vladimir 5
              Vladimir 5 12 October 2018 18: 43
              0
              swamps The helicopter has 130 knots or more, the Raptor will not be able to intercept labor, but the Raptor is already fighting a helicopter at distant frontiers ... The Raptor, as an armored base, is quite suitable for many tasks. to add high-precision air defense and anti-ship missile weapons and a very successful boat for many occasions will come out ...
              1. marshes
                marshes 12 October 2018 18: 52
                0
                Quote: Vladimir 5
                swamps The helicopter has 130 knots or more, the Raptor will not be able to intercept labor, but the Raptor is already fighting a helicopter at distant frontiers ... The Raptor, as an armored base, is quite suitable for many tasks. to add high-precision air defense and anti-ship missile weapons and a very successful boat for many occasions will come out ...

                48-52 knots is the approximate speed of Dagestan poaching canoes, an open sailing boat with two Honda engines. What I know is very difficult to intercept. And this is very rare.
                1. Vladimir 5
                  Vladimir 5 12 October 2018 19: 09
                  -1
                  Chasing poachers should be left to helicopters with landing on boats, because until you get to them, they will wander ... Although people earn a living there, with today's affairs and the disastrous economy of the Russian Federation. In my opinion let them go fishing, it’s better than they will start to plunder. blocking oxygen in the fish ...
                  1. marshes
                    marshes 12 October 2018 19: 19
                    0
                    Quote: Vladimir 5
                    Chasing poachers, you need to leave the helicopters with landing on boats, because until you reach them, they will sway ..

                    It’s just to shoot the engine with the SVD and it’s from a helicopter, we have such craftsmen. But the opportunity is provided when there is not a big wave, it’s hard to leave. Then the border boats are suitable, mainly for evacuation, but sometimes the engines are closed with the body.
                    But poachers from outside, our or fishermen, just don’t see the radar for it, and they know by heart the regular flights of our helicopters.

                    By the way, from last year, we were asked not to shoot someone else's poachers, although 20 years it was nevermind.
                    None steel cables do their job.
          2. urman
            urman 12 October 2018 18: 28
            +2
            and before they built SHIPS !!!!
            1. Waldemar
              Waldemar 12 October 2018 18: 50
              0
              Cruisers, destroyers, aircraft carriers ....
      2. Lara Croft
        Lara Croft 12 October 2018 18: 26
        +3
        Quote: Vladimir 5
        It’s better to put at least 30 mm, the volley is completely different, and the enemy will bypass the side ... You need to arm immediately, it may be too late to re-arm later ...

        You can install with foolishness and PU for "calibers" ...
        1. Vladimir 5
          Vladimir 5 12 October 2018 18: 31
          -1
          The nonsense will come when the need compels, and they deliver it, the caliber will go overload, but something easier will happen .... True, the Raptor is for other actions, but it seems to fit (from lack of fish) into a linear system ...
          1. Lara Croft
            Lara Croft 12 October 2018 18: 32
            +2
            Quote: Vladimir 5
            Dope will come when need makes you

            When need will make other types of boats do, and this one has other tasks ...
          2. marshes
            marshes 12 October 2018 18: 35
            +1
            Quote: Vladimir 5
            The nonsense will come when the need compels, and they deliver it, the caliber will go overload, but something easier will happen .... True, the Raptor is for other actions, but it seems to fit (from lack of fish) into a linear system ...

            Just look on the sides, negative angles.
  3. Waldemar
    Waldemar 12 October 2018 18: 48
    0
    Do they even build motorboats at the pace of two pieces per year, although you can do 1500 for six months?
  4. Adimius38
    Adimius38 12 October 2018 22: 11
    0
    transdec achievement))) two boats no more than a fishing motor boat))) would not have been amused) another thing would have been said 50 such boats were handed over to the fleet high poachers are chasing)
  5. lvov_aleksey
    lvov_aleksey 12 October 2018 23: 23
    0
    Hello everyone, Mlyn, read carefully:
    "The order has been fully completed, the boats are distributed between the Black Sea, Baltic fleets and the Caspian flotilla."
  6. Sergey Goncharov
    Sergey Goncharov 13 October 2018 04: 28
    0
    Actually - "KORD" - 12,7-mm machine gun... soldier
  7. serg.shishkov2015
    serg.shishkov2015 13 October 2018 09: 21
    0
    To live until a happy day when the news says that a new Russian aircraft carrier was launched, ..and his name is in honor of the city that most deserved this honor- * Sevastopol *!
    1. Lara Croft
      Lara Croft 13 October 2018 12: 20
      +1
      Quote: serg.shishkov2015
      To live until a happy day when the news says that a new Russian aircraft carrier was launched, ..and his name is in honor of the city, who more than others deserve this honor- * Sevastopol *!

      Why did he deserve more than others?
  8. lvov_aleksey
    lvov_aleksey 13 October 2018 23: 12
    0
    What is the difference, Cities - Heroes, or Cities - Military Glory, but generally cities from the Middle Ages.
    This is our story. And it does not matter what name the ship will bear, if only for the good of the patronymic and 7 feet to it under the keel.
  9. igorka357
    igorka357 14 October 2018 10: 23
    +1
    Eeeeee..u amers on the slipways of the three-piece Burkov of the new series is on the way, and we have the Raptors ... cool ... !!!!!!!!