Unofficial compensation: the true reason for the meeting between Trump and Putin
Western fake media pounced on their favorite topic about the destruction of Europe and NATO by Trump in favor of Vladimir Putin, once again asking himself: but is not Trump the agent of Putin? Given that both Trump and Putin have a sense of humor, we can confidently predict the beginning of their meeting in Helsinki:
- Hello, Vladimir, how did I cope with the task of destroying Europe and NATO? I'm counting on my presidency?
"Dear Donald, what are the accounts between the old comrades?" Here, get acquainted, I prepared a secret decree on conferring on you the title of the hero of Russia. However, the show should continue, let's talk about our next ... event to save the world in the interests of peace, the US and Russia.
In general, it is the fake Western policy towards Russia, the phantasmagoric history of the American media about "Trump's conspiracy with Putin" that makes this incredible political carnival possible, from which either cry or laugh ... However, behind this carnival are serious things.
The main motive for this visit was expressed by Trump immediately upon the arrival of the Secretary General of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, in a simple and understandable language: "Washington protects Europe and Germany completely controlled by Russia through gas supplies from Russia. I believe that Germany is a hostage to Russia. " The whole of Europe was horrified by this statement, and in fact, from the perspective of the ocean, Trump is quite logical.
The official strategy of the West, including Europe, is built on "restraining Russia's aggression", and Germany has repeatedly signed it, including its hypocrisy over Ukrainian events, according to the Minsk agreements, which Russia allegedly does not fulfill. Russia has always spoken about the falsity of this policy of Europe, and proof of its deceit is just the wide economic cooperation between Europe and Russia and the construction of the "Nord Stream - 2" by Germany. With a potential aggressor such economic relations can not be.
The West did not notice this lie of the West in Obama's presidency, Obama was going to meet Europe here, at the expense of US interests, allowing wide economic cooperation between Germany and Europe and Russia. This was a consequence of the policy of the "democrats" -Neocons of the United States to establish financial control over the world by including independent countries and Russia in its financial and economic system, followed by a "change of regimes" in them to pro-Western comprador ones.
Europe carried out in this "democratic" neocon strategy the role of the bells of independent countries in the western bush. This strategy recently worked successfully in Ukraine. However, in Russia it got stuck, the confrontation of the West with Russia began, which was supported by China and the entire non-Western world. It is understandable that all this supposedly refined policy of the West was absolutely clear to the whole of the non-Western world, but he, in the East, never says to the end what he thinks.
And then Donald Trump in Brussels opens this secret to the whole world Polisinel and to the end, because the policy of the neocons and Barack Obama led to a deadlock in the US, and she has already been put in waste. Trump caught Europe for the thesis of "Russia's aggression" and asked in Brussels: what do you then cooperate with the "aggressor"? Replenish his treasury every year for billions of dollars, buying natural gas?
Yes, the great and terrible Trump came to destroy the "democratic" neocon system of US domination in the world, because only the US paid for this system and broke, so Trump came and tells all his vassals: pay money for your safety, for your prosperity at our expense. , restore your economic balance with the US, we will no longer drag you in tow. To a certain extent, the US was now in the position of the late USSR, also building its world system, but also overstrained and dumping all its burdensome vassals, a number of independent reviewers insisted on this.
And of course, Trump is the tip of the American iceberg that conducted an audit of the US neocons policy and was horrified by the opening corruption and imbalances of "world democracy". By the way, therefore, Trump has no special claims to Russia: because there is no serious trade between the US and Russia, which means that there are no imbalances and corruption. Now it becomes obvious to everyone that Trump has come "seriously and for a long time": he is not alone, just Farida Zakaria, Michael McFaul and other "neocons" and CNN are barred from discussing US policy and therefore lie about the uncontrollability and unpredictability of President Trump. This time they "do not see" behind him the Nobel laureate in economics Joseph Stiglitz and other prominent tramp drivers.
It seems that the last hope of the European and American global neocons was to disrupt the rapprochement and the meeting between Trump and Putin was the operation of the "Newcomer". During Trump's visit to London, the story of the "Novice" suddenly surfaced again, but Trump did not leave any hopes for the English provocateurs, he took the issue out of the brackets. In this connection comes to mind the strange visit of three (!) Heads of Russian special services to Washington, where they had meetings with the then head of the CIA, Mike Pompeo, today's US Secretary of State. Was it about the "Novice" they talked about, about six months before poisoning in Salisbury? Then it is clear Trump's request to London to provide proof of history in Salisbury, the hasty resignation of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who supported the anti-Russian accusations of London, and in general the withdrawn reaction of Trump and Pompeo to the story with Novice.
It is noteworthy that Trump uses a simple, figurative language in his political speeches, which contrasts sharply with the "democratically" pompous, Obama-style professorial language, and most of today's politicians. To understand what they want to say, you need to wade through the verbal jungles of common phrases. Trump this advantageously distinguishes, this is his great advantage over the speeches of Obama and his followers in the eyes of ordinary Americans. By the way, Putin also often uses a simple figurative language, especially in his direct lines. What and how can they talk in Helsinki?
The Western press now screams that Trump and Putin will not agree on anything in Helsinki. I am pleased to note that I predicted this reaction in previous articles. Yuri Ushakov, Putin's aide, said that the main goal of the summit is to "restore confidence", Sergei Lavrov noted that it will be a great success to restore "channels of communication" between the countries that are now frozen. Officially, apparently, everything will be like this, and there will be no exchanges on Syria, Ukraine and Iran.
But what can stay behind the protocol, given the manner of communication and Trump and Putin? Perhaps, they will continue in a joking tone, set by fake media like CNN:
- Vladimir, understand, I'm grazing, guarding the herd of these European cows, and they go to your left, and you milk them, of course, for billions of dollars! Vladimir, these are my cows, and I must milk them! American liquefied gas is just as good as the Russian pipe! I understand that you are not guilty, they themselves go to you, but this issue needs to be solved somehow. I do not need Ukraine at all, and many more things ...
- Dear Donald, I understand your concern about cows, and your special, you might say, cultural and historical rights to them, but how about my falling income from selling natural gas? If we can somehow resolve this issue, then I'm sure we will solve the issues of discipline among your European herd.
... On the issue of the construction of the "North Stream 2" by Russia and Germany with Europe, US officials and Trump himself are still making contradictory statements, apparently, the issue of compensation for Russia's falling revenues has not yet been completely resolved. To solve it, we need a summit meeting between Trump and Putin, and it (the decision) can only be unofficial.
Information