Amesbury and Salisbury. Is CIA behind the poisonings?
30 June in the town of Amesbury, which is not far from the infamous Salisbury, two people were poisoned: a man and a woman, living in a civil marriage. On the same day, in critical condition, they were taken to hospital.
At first, the police suggested that the poisoning was the result of a drug overdose: patients are said to have a tendency to expand consciousness. But soon this version was refuted, stating that the victims were victims of the Novice gas poison gas!
This event is widely covered in the media. And it would hardly make sense once again to talk in detail about this without some exclusive information on the progress of the investigation or the condition of the victims, because in any news the tape you can get all the latest information on this issue. We confine ourselves to stating the basic facts.
First of all, we note that representatives of Scotland Yard and the British authorities denied any evidence pointing to Russia as a possible organizer of this crime. They did not find the connection between this case and the “Scripal case”, which recently shook the world media and was actively used to discredit Russia before the World Cup.
On the other hand, such a coincidence simply cannot be accidental: here to you and Salisbury, where Squeaks were poisoned, and the “Novice” poison, which is not on the road, and the British secret laboratory, where they work with similar substances. All this is concentrated on a rather small piece of land, and it’s not so much in time to close its eyes.
And if so, we have every reason to consider several versions of what happened: both the media already put forward and the not so obvious, but no less interesting ones.
Version one: it's still Russian
Surely there will be amateur conspiracy therapists who will argue that this is still the work of Russian special services. “Bloody tyrant Putin”, he says, decided to let the fog in and confuse as much as possible the traces of his atrocities.
In principle, this could be considered seriously, but under one condition: if the British investigators had serious evidence on their hands, and Russia would have serious legal consequences if it were proved that they were involved in the previous incident.
But the weak point of this version is that the scandal with the Crypts has almost subsided, the Kremlin has managed to avoid any serious consequences, and these accusations are of little interest even to London at the moment. And in such a situation it is simply unreasonable to start a “second series” of scandal, adding fuel to an almost extinguished fire.
Therefore, for all the entertaining nature of such a conspiracy, it hardly deserves a serious attitude. And "democratic journalists" let them frolic - this is their job.
Version two: this is yet another provocation by the British themselves, who are just willing to draw attention to the almost faded scandal.
Well, it already seems a bit more adequate and plausible. The scandal for internal use can always be used to solve some domestic political goals: electoral, for example. Or demand more budget money - also quite a profitable business.
But in this version, the speed with which the British hurried to notify the public in the absence of a new Russian track and of any connection with the “Scripal case” was embarrassing. Without this, the real scandal will not work, and the public (and politicians from a rival party), which is good, may wonder about the competence of the authorities and law enforcement agencies. And indeed, they lit a mess, the strongest poisonous substance freely roams around the country, people are being poisoned, and no one is responsible for this.
In general, in no country does the government like to demonstrate its own impotence, because it affects the ratings very badly. And supposing that the British themselves have planted such a “pig” for themselves is somehow too disrespectful: they have in fact really excellent special services, powerful analytical structures, experienced politicians. This is not the current Kiev regime, which repeatedly shoots itself in the leg, it is the pros who should be looked for and should be treated accordingly.
And if so, then we will most likely reject this version.
Version three: mess and sloppiness
Purely theoretically, we can assume that in the above-mentioned laboratory the secrecy regime was “worn out”, and someone was able to remove the chemical poisonous substance from there. This, of course, sounds crazy, but if it turns out to be true, then much will immediately be explained.
On the other hand, official London will certainly try to hide such information, because it will instantly destroy all the charges against Moscow and Putin. And it’s probably not necessary to explain how Teresa May, as well as her allies who supported her, will be explained.
Therefore, we will be realistic and agree that if the British find some mess in their territory, we still will not know about it. But the version is interesting, and just in case, we will follow the news: what if they speak?
And the last, most likely, version: The CIA uses the British "in the dark", arranging on the territory of the Union of baiting retired agents and accidentally turned up by civilians.
This version is very plausible precisely because both the first and second episodes with poisonings perfectly coincide with the interests of the United States or certain American political circles. Judge for yourself.
Scripal poisoning occurred during the period when it was not too late to boycott the World Cup, which many of our enemies in Russia wanted to prevent literally at any cost.
Why did the Americans organize the assault in England? Well, if only because America itself is not the football country itself, and the US team did not make it to the World Cup. And if so, the demarches of the American Football Federation would hardly have a serious chance of success.
But the UK - is another matter. She and the founder of football, and the owner of the most popular domestic club championship, and a ticket to the World Cup in Russia itself has extracted. And if the British had undertaken such a demarche, the holding of the World Cup in Russia would really be in question.
Now the Americans have another need - to disrupt the meeting of Trump and Putin. More precisely, not all Americans, and the anti-Trump forces, which are not only enough in the corridors of Congress or the Senate, but also in the same CIA. And a major international scandal can greatly contribute to the solution of this specific problem.
Especially since it is not necessary to invent anything: “Beginner”, Salisbury, Creaking ... No one will believe in any coincidence, and everyone will begin to nod at Russia as usual.
And Trump just before the meeting with Putin just scheduled a visit to London. And what will they tell him there, the question is still open!
Therefore, no matter how many versions we have, we do not forget that only the version of the American intervention answers the question “who benefits?” And in two episodes at once!
And this is a symptom.
At first, the police suggested that the poisoning was the result of a drug overdose: patients are said to have a tendency to expand consciousness. But soon this version was refuted, stating that the victims were victims of the Novice gas poison gas!
This event is widely covered in the media. And it would hardly make sense once again to talk in detail about this without some exclusive information on the progress of the investigation or the condition of the victims, because in any news the tape you can get all the latest information on this issue. We confine ourselves to stating the basic facts.
First of all, we note that representatives of Scotland Yard and the British authorities denied any evidence pointing to Russia as a possible organizer of this crime. They did not find the connection between this case and the “Scripal case”, which recently shook the world media and was actively used to discredit Russia before the World Cup.
On the other hand, such a coincidence simply cannot be accidental: here to you and Salisbury, where Squeaks were poisoned, and the “Novice” poison, which is not on the road, and the British secret laboratory, where they work with similar substances. All this is concentrated on a rather small piece of land, and it’s not so much in time to close its eyes.
And if so, we have every reason to consider several versions of what happened: both the media already put forward and the not so obvious, but no less interesting ones.
Version one: it's still Russian
Surely there will be amateur conspiracy therapists who will argue that this is still the work of Russian special services. “Bloody tyrant Putin”, he says, decided to let the fog in and confuse as much as possible the traces of his atrocities.
In principle, this could be considered seriously, but under one condition: if the British investigators had serious evidence on their hands, and Russia would have serious legal consequences if it were proved that they were involved in the previous incident.
But the weak point of this version is that the scandal with the Crypts has almost subsided, the Kremlin has managed to avoid any serious consequences, and these accusations are of little interest even to London at the moment. And in such a situation it is simply unreasonable to start a “second series” of scandal, adding fuel to an almost extinguished fire.
Therefore, for all the entertaining nature of such a conspiracy, it hardly deserves a serious attitude. And "democratic journalists" let them frolic - this is their job.
Version two: this is yet another provocation by the British themselves, who are just willing to draw attention to the almost faded scandal.
Well, it already seems a bit more adequate and plausible. The scandal for internal use can always be used to solve some domestic political goals: electoral, for example. Or demand more budget money - also quite a profitable business.
But in this version, the speed with which the British hurried to notify the public in the absence of a new Russian track and of any connection with the “Scripal case” was embarrassing. Without this, the real scandal will not work, and the public (and politicians from a rival party), which is good, may wonder about the competence of the authorities and law enforcement agencies. And indeed, they lit a mess, the strongest poisonous substance freely roams around the country, people are being poisoned, and no one is responsible for this.
In general, in no country does the government like to demonstrate its own impotence, because it affects the ratings very badly. And supposing that the British themselves have planted such a “pig” for themselves is somehow too disrespectful: they have in fact really excellent special services, powerful analytical structures, experienced politicians. This is not the current Kiev regime, which repeatedly shoots itself in the leg, it is the pros who should be looked for and should be treated accordingly.
And if so, then we will most likely reject this version.
Version three: mess and sloppiness
Purely theoretically, we can assume that in the above-mentioned laboratory the secrecy regime was “worn out”, and someone was able to remove the chemical poisonous substance from there. This, of course, sounds crazy, but if it turns out to be true, then much will immediately be explained.
On the other hand, official London will certainly try to hide such information, because it will instantly destroy all the charges against Moscow and Putin. And it’s probably not necessary to explain how Teresa May, as well as her allies who supported her, will be explained.
Therefore, we will be realistic and agree that if the British find some mess in their territory, we still will not know about it. But the version is interesting, and just in case, we will follow the news: what if they speak?
And the last, most likely, version: The CIA uses the British "in the dark", arranging on the territory of the Union of baiting retired agents and accidentally turned up by civilians.
This version is very plausible precisely because both the first and second episodes with poisonings perfectly coincide with the interests of the United States or certain American political circles. Judge for yourself.
Scripal poisoning occurred during the period when it was not too late to boycott the World Cup, which many of our enemies in Russia wanted to prevent literally at any cost.
Why did the Americans organize the assault in England? Well, if only because America itself is not the football country itself, and the US team did not make it to the World Cup. And if so, the demarches of the American Football Federation would hardly have a serious chance of success.
But the UK - is another matter. She and the founder of football, and the owner of the most popular domestic club championship, and a ticket to the World Cup in Russia itself has extracted. And if the British had undertaken such a demarche, the holding of the World Cup in Russia would really be in question.
Now the Americans have another need - to disrupt the meeting of Trump and Putin. More precisely, not all Americans, and the anti-Trump forces, which are not only enough in the corridors of Congress or the Senate, but also in the same CIA. And a major international scandal can greatly contribute to the solution of this specific problem.
Especially since it is not necessary to invent anything: “Beginner”, Salisbury, Creaking ... No one will believe in any coincidence, and everyone will begin to nod at Russia as usual.
And Trump just before the meeting with Putin just scheduled a visit to London. And what will they tell him there, the question is still open!
Therefore, no matter how many versions we have, we do not forget that only the version of the American intervention answers the question “who benefits?” And in two episodes at once!
And this is a symptom.
Information