The decision of the London court: to freeze the assets of "Gazprom" can and should be

139
The London Commercial Court ruled to freeze the assets of the Russian company Gazprom. The corresponding petition, we recall, sent NAK "Naftogaz". It is known that the London court allowed the procedure for the arrest of Gazprom property in British territory. The fact of how much Gazprom’s property in Britain and its subordinate territories has not yet been reported.

Recall that a few days ago, the Court of Appeal of the Swedish District Svea decided to satisfy Gazprom’s appeal against the decision of the Stockholm arbitration court, which awarded NNGT to pay 4,7 billion dollars under the so-called transit contract and allow the arrest of Gazprom property abroad. The Svea Court of Appeal effectively quashed the decision of the Stockholm arbitration to arrest Gazprom assets outside Russia. However, the commercial court of London made a different decision: why not freeze it ...



The decision of the London court: to freeze the assets of "Gazprom" can and should be


It is worth recalling that Gazprom is one of the main sponsors of the FIFA World Cup in Russia. In this tournament, takes part and the England team. Thus, the London court is going to strike at its own football team, whose participation along with other teams in the final stage of the World Cup 2018 does not do without sponsorship from the Russian gas giant?
139 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +61
    19 June 2018 18: 04
    Smart people, after the decision of the Stockholm court, have already withdrawn loot from there. Is there still Gazprom loot in London. If there is, then Miller LOCH!
    1. +33
      19 June 2018 18: 06
      Freeze all Gazprom supplies to the island. hi
      1. +13
        19 June 2018 18: 09
        And what Gazprom assets were found in London? As early as this spring, Gazprom’s largest office abroad was located there. In total, a thousand people worked for Gazprom in London, which amounted to half of the total number of personnel in the foreign offices of the monopoly.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +2
            20 June 2018 02: 57
            At this rate, you will get to the article if you don’t start to think about what you write. I can agree with you or not, but without breaking laws like you
        2. +1
          20 June 2018 02: 56
          They closed when Skryral raced as far as I remember.
        3. 0
          20 June 2018 10: 43
          England, like the United States, already consumes Gazprom's LNG.
          Or did you forget?
      2. +6
        19 June 2018 18: 22
        Quote: Kasym
        Freeze all Gazprom supplies to the island. hi

        if there’s no confusion, there are assets of bipi in the Russian Federation, here they are also confiscated
        1. MPN
          +11
          19 June 2018 18: 40
          One word gopnik damn ...
          1. +24
            19 June 2018 19: 58
            Quote: MPN
            One word gopnik damn ...

            Yes well done damn it! They proceed from their national interests. When, finally, "our" government will begin to move out of our national interests? Gas pipelines, oil pipelines - ugh, China only earns more on exporting fucking children's toys.
            Evil is not enough, and it’s a shame for the state.
            And Romanov
            Miller goof
            I want to say, Sasha, they do not keep suckers there! Upstairs, our carcasses were already divided and sold. I don’t like Makarevich, but I like one song - puppets.
            1. SSR
              +2
              19 June 2018 22: 43
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Quote: MPN
              One word gopnik damn ...

              Yes well done damn it! They proceed from their national interests. When, finally, "our" government will begin to move out of our national interests? Gas pipelines, oil pipelines - ugh, China only earns more by exporting fucking children's toys.
              Evil is not enough, and it’s a shame for the state.
              And Romanov
              Miller goof
              I want to say, Sasha, they do not keep suckers there! Upstairs, our carcasses were already divided and sold. I don’t like Makarevich, but I like one song - puppets.

              Sorry.
              In what place do they keep their face? And the interests of the Saxon torn cat, which lost its cunning?
              They with all their "bodies" show that the famous "English law" is violated, and many many ...
              This is a confrontation for decades and who knows, maybe the highest legal, international instance, the Russian or Asian Court will soon become. Imha Uralsky.
              PS.
              Anglo-Saxons degenerate, specifically the islanders.
              1. +1
                20 June 2018 02: 13
                Do not confuse your coat with state. The point is that it is worth taking care of people, and raising her retirement age. In every city of Russia where there was - the building of the pension fund is the most pretentious, and inside the scum and leaflets on frantically expensive paper.
                I propose a referendum on raising the retirement age.
                As for the Anglo-Saxons, purely gentlemanly rules apply: if a gentleman cannot win by the rules, he changes the rules; the Englishwoman has no friends, she has interests; gentleman is the master of his word: maybe he can take it.
                But in general (excuse me) - rightly so, you don’t prescribe foreign jurisdiction in the contracts (Or were they forced? Ay, I doubt it)
                And most importantly: from Gazprom (almost inevitably, well, which of the gentlemen will refuse a freebie) they will recover from 2 to 4 lard cu, we will swallow again, but to retirees - a big deal.
                If Comrade Putin is aware of this (and I don’t think he is uninformed), then my respect for him has fallen sharply.
                1. +1
                  20 June 2018 03: 38
                  No referendum needed. The result is clear without it. Only a waste of money and time
                2. +2
                  20 June 2018 06: 54
                  Why a referendum? Only a waste of budget money. Through the efforts of active citizens, EdRo has a constitutional majority in the State Duma. So in the referendum you will write the same percentage of "approvals."

                  "It doesn’t matter how they voted - it matters how they counted." I. St.
              2. +1
                20 June 2018 07: 32
                Quote from S.S.R.
                Anglo-Saxons degenerate, specifically the islanders.

                They have degenerated for a long time. But things are still there.
              3. 0
                20 June 2018 13: 54
                Of course they are expressed, two peasants in a marriage cannot give birth, it is not given to them.
            2. 0
              20 June 2018 14: 53
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              When, finally, "our" government will begin to move out of our national interests?

              It’s difficult to proceed from your interests. Moreover, your interests often change somewhat.
              1. 0
                20 June 2018 16: 16
                Quote: sogdy
                Moreover, your interests often change somewhat.

                Can you explain your words about the frequent change of my interests?
          2. +1
            20 June 2018 03: 34
            Quote: MPN
            One word gopnik damn ...


            Not enough seeds ...
    2. +6
      19 June 2018 18: 09
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Smart people, after the decision of the Stockholm court, have already withdrawn loot from there. Is there still Gazprom loot in London. If there is, then Miller LOCH!

      Money may not be, but real estate remains. You can’t sell it right away.
      1. 0
        19 June 2018 18: 44
        besides this there are also gas storages and gas pipes to residential buildings.
        they can confiscate it.
        Well, let it go. then Gazprom will have nowhere to transport its gas. and whose gas he will take to replace the Saxons, this is a mystery covered in darkness.
        maybe from kaklov they will buy first gas.
        1. +5
          19 June 2018 18: 59
          Quote: just explo
          maybe from kaklov they’ll buy gas

          Why kaklov laughing they can only actually deliver peas, but a certain Donny and Melania broke up in a smile overseas. laughing
          1. +9
            19 June 2018 19: 34
            Well, in general, if the assets are confiscated, then the farther gas will be necessary for the Russians. The victims will have to be supported, and usually it will be supported by pensioners and hard workers. So Volodenka will carry you without peas ..
            1. +3
              19 June 2018 23: 15
              Quote: sapporo1959
              So Volodenka will carry you without peas

              So Serezhenka will carry the brothers of Belarusians sooner, but having received a payment we can only get out of our eyes. laughing
              Quote: sapporo1959
              Well, in general, if the assets are confiscated, then fart gas more Russians will have to.

              Sergey explain to me not reasonable laughingconfiscated abroad, and fart gas in Russia belay gas prices will skyrocket, here I agree, but as there was gas, Serezhenka will be so, it’s enough to think with slogans, it’s time to head on. No offense. hi
        2. +5
          19 June 2018 20: 03
          Quote: just explo
          maybe from kaklov they will buy first gas.

          And what, I would buy the same! And then "our" gas has been promised to us for almost 10 years, in 2015 they vowed to hold it. Now they’ve calmed down, and even approximate dates are not voiced.
          We ourselves won’t do so much, but we need to heat the house. Winters are more severe in our country than in kaklov. wink
          1. +5
            19 June 2018 21: 07
            I lived on Sakhalin for 36 years, and I saw gas only when I moved to Belarus ..
            1. 0
              20 June 2018 15: 02
              Quote: sapporo1959
              I lived on Sakhalin for 36 years, and I saw gas only when I moved to Belarus ..

              And in what form did you want to see gas on Sakhalin?
              1. +1
                20 June 2018 16: 19
                Quote: sogdy
                And in what form did you want to see gas on Sakhalin?

                And to think weakly? Already clearly not in the form of drilling. laughing
                1. 0
                  21 June 2018 12: 14
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  And to think weakly? Already clearly not in the form of drilling. laughing

                  Boy, and Sakhalin - where is he?
                  And we still remember how the Chita children howled in sanatoriums beyond the Irkutsk bridge when they expected the bombing of Chita.
                  1. +1
                    21 June 2018 18: 32
                    Quote: sogdy
                    Youngster

                    Grandfather, I’m no longer a boy! laughing
                    Quote: sogdy
                    And we still remember how the Chita children howled in sanatoriums beyond the Irkutsk bridge when they expected the bombing of Chita.

                    What reality was this? belay
                    1. +1
                      22 June 2018 13: 18
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      What reality was this?

                      Which completely refutes
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      I’m no longer a boy!

                      is it really a girl ?!
                      1. 0
                        24 June 2018 18: 29
                        Phenazipam is over, did the holidays begin at the kanepachik dacha? wink
    3. +20
      19 June 2018 18: 10
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Smart people, after the decision of the Stockholm court, have already withdrawn loot from there. Is there still Gazprom loot in London. If there is, then Miller LOCH!

      Just Miller FSUs, the state compensates.
      1. +5
        19 June 2018 18: 23
        In fact, if England goes far in the World Cup 18, then it’s worth waiting for Teresa’s visit. Her trump pissed off on J-7, Brexit narrows her contacts in the EU. She certainly does not want to stay in the dark - she will strive to establish relations with the GDP, which, in principle, is not opposed.
        But the most interesting thing will be after a meeting with Trump. The whole EU will take a seat on “treason" - what the two decided there, maybe they divided the whole world and they did not even leave us a piece. Europe will go on a visit to GDP - and Moscow may not accept without “presents”. Then, against this background, Beijing will appear. It is highly dependent on resources with the EU. "Volodya, what have you decided with Ryzhiy and Eurosvory? Can you tell me?" hi
        1. +1
          19 June 2018 20: 14
          With Aloizych, I remember, already shared.
        2. +2
          19 June 2018 23: 27
          Quote: Kasym
          "Volodya, what have you decided with Ryzhiy and Eurosvory? Can you tell me?"

          It would be better if he figured out with his redhead (Chubais) ...
          1. +2
            19 June 2018 23: 40
            Sergey, I’m looking at the KZ, we already have a "prison government" formed. From the former prime minister to governors and ministers ... Last week, they took 1 foreign secretary. The week before last anticorrosive. The agency reported the detention of 32 high postal. bureaucrats, of which the heads of government agencies are 15 people, 5 people. republics. meanings - they promised to announce the names later ... I’m why, you will start it soon - there is such certainty. hi
        3. 0
          19 June 2018 23: 51
          Quote: Kasym
          But the most interesting thing will be after a meeting with Trump.


          Trump himself in the US as a puppet.

          he is a little already in age and therefore not quite adequately (insanity grows stronger) responds to the challenges thrown to him.
    4. +4
      19 June 2018 18: 18
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Smart people, after the decision of the Stockholm court, have already withdrawn loot from there. Is there still Gazprom loot in London. If there is, then Miller LOCH!

      not everything is as simple as you think !! request request
      1. +1
        19 June 2018 18: 19
        Quote: Nikolai the Greek
        e is as simple as you think !!

        Maybe I just don’t know where and what Gazprom has
        1. +4
          19 June 2018 18: 25
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Nikolai the Greek
          e is as simple as you think !!

          Maybe I just don’t know where and what Gazprom has

          if Gazprom could conduct its activities, holding all the assets in Russia, then they would do so !!! request request but in reality in a disastrous global economy, everything is much worse !! negative negative negative
    5. +3
      19 June 2018 18: 33
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Smart people, after the decision of the Stockholm court, have already withdrawn loot from there. Is there still Gazprom loot in London. If there is, then Miller LOCH!

      Well, you are Sanya and rude! Withdrawing assets, with any schucher this is the height of cowardice and the Russians are not like that .. Gazprom is not all kinds of Berezovsky and Abramovich ..)))
      Let them try, and there it will be seen hi
    6. +14
      19 June 2018 18: 43
      "Gazprom" is the property of the people "therefore Miller does not lose anything, he is losing the people (raising tariffs for his people).
      1. 0
        20 June 2018 15: 09
        Quote: private person
        "Gazprom" is the property of the people "therefore Miller does not lose anything, he is losing the people (raising tariffs for his people).

        Now justify your conclusion.
        And yes, gas in the Russian Federation is not Gazprom, but local developers.
        1. 0
          20 June 2018 16: 33
          Gasoline is the same local developers and not Transneft and Rosneft, but nonetheless. Some produce and others only pump and you think they also have nothing to do with it?
          1. 0
            21 June 2018 12: 17
            That is, the relationship with the state corporation is not monitored in any way.
            Can you deal with local farmers? The chain will grow from a completely different place. From the Germans and bulkers.
    7. +4
      19 June 2018 19: 12
      But it was not necessary to unilaterally withdraw the contingent from the GDR.
      1. 0
        20 June 2018 06: 58
        Was it "New Thinking"? We must look wider! (with)
    8. +3
      19 June 2018 19: 34
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Smart people

      after 2019, gas transit through the territory of Ukraine will be completely stopped, but unfortunately this will not happen, because the “brotherly people” live there, so that through ...
      1. +2
        19 June 2018 20: 26
        Quote: taiga2018
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Smart people

        after 2019, gas transit through the territory of Ukraine will be completely stopped, but unfortunately this will not happen, because the “brotherly people” live there, so that through ...

        The people there are not fraternal, but ours lives. That's just decides, like ours, not him.
    9. +3
      19 June 2018 20: 23
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Smart people, after the decision of the Stockholm court, have already withdrawn loot from there. Is there still Gazprom loot in London. If there is, then Miller LOCH!

      First time agree with a London court! And also with the fact that Miller is a goof if there are Gazprom assets in London ..
    10. +1
      19 June 2018 21: 55
      . If there is, then Miller LOCH!
      Why are you so yours? He’s not a Bolshevik, any. Although your cry is not addressed. Weak claims to present to the Chairman of the Board of Directors? And Miller is just the vice chairman.
    11. 0
      20 June 2018 02: 59
      Oh well. If you have a big business in your country, of course you will remove all the offices from there. You do not need to manage it. Naf do you need it? By itself, everything will work)
    12. 0
      20 June 2018 04: 02
      . If there is, then Miller LOCH!
      MILLER SUCK!
    13. 0
      20 June 2018 07: 36
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      If there is, then Miller LOCH!

      Are assets only money?
    14. 0
      20 June 2018 13: 50
      Miller-Friend, and nevermind that his constant screwing costs a lot of money to both Gazprom and the country. I have the impression of his complete incompetence, or he is a Cossack mishandled ... somehow.
  2. +9
    19 June 2018 18: 05
    Register further capital in the UK, what can I say ... How many times does a roasted rooster have to peck so that they already understand that it is most reliable to keep money in Spain or neutral countries like Switzerland and Luxembourg?
    1. +11
      19 June 2018 18: 39
      Quote: YarSer88
      How many times does a roasted rooster have to peck so that they already understand that it is most reliable to keep money in Spain or neutral countries like Switzerland and Luxembourg?

      Money must be stored in RUSSIA! Because if the left heel of the first secretary of the Washington regional committee wants, then both Spain and Luxembourg with Switzerland will bend over vigorously in all the necessary poses ... Look, how quickly Muammurchik Gaddafi’s accounts were frozen.
      1. +6
        19 June 2018 18: 44
        In Russia, the chance to lose money is much higher than in Spain. It’s good to make money in Russia, but it’s dangerous to keep it. At any time, you can fall into disgrace, and then stripped as sticky. Too much depends on how those in power treat you. In Spain, everyone doesn’t care about your capital, if only the investments go, which is quite suitable for everyone.

        There, in the next branch, they were just discussing that top managers (and the head of the organization is also a top manager) need to make an income tax of 80%. Where Washington is, they won’t think of such a long time.
        1. +2
          19 June 2018 20: 36
          In "tattered" Europe, such taxes have long been.
        2. 0
          19 June 2018 22: 43
          Quote: YarSer88
          In Russia, the chance to lose money is much higher than in Spain. It’s good to make money in Russia, but it’s dangerous to keep it. At any time, you can fall into disgrace, and then stripped as sticky. Too much depends on how those in power treat you.

          So it is almost everywhere where there is big capital - in a different way only where big capital itself took power, as in the USA and Europe.

          Quote: YarSer88
          In Spain, everyone doesn’t care about your capital, if only the investments go, which suits everyone.

          Oga, and then some very tanned red-haired and cheerful American president arrives and quickly presses the Spaniards into the causal place with a door from the safe on the subject "quickly freeze the accounts of all these bad decisions" and raise your Spain paws to the top. If they even Swiss banks bent on the topic of blocking Gaddafi's accounts ...
          And Spain itself is also the "economic leader" - it lives almost at the expense of Catalonia.
          1. +1
            20 June 2018 10: 25
            This is all reasoning “maybe ..”, or maybe tomorrow we will have a revolution about which they shout at every corner, the new Lenins “take them away and divide them, factories - workers”, and everything that they invested and earned - to the friendly cries of the workers - safely destroyed and drunk. In Spain, it’s still calm, there will be prerequisites - I will look for another country. The fact that she is not very rich does not frighten me personally, the main thing is that my capital is safe and sound there. In Russia, there is no such certainty; people here in the morning can jump into shape, get to the bottom of anything and throw in a jail where a “heart attack” will happen, since my heart is not the healthiest organ. This is a real threat, and not a hypothetical "tanned president of an incomprehensible third world country."
        3. 0
          19 June 2018 22: 44
          Quote: YarSer88
          There, in the next branch, they were just discussing that top managers (and the head of the organization is also a top manager) need to make an income tax of 80%. Where Washington is, they won’t think of such a long time.

          I’ll tell you a big secret, just don’t tell anyone, okay? In America, for a long time - 80-90 years, there are approximately such taxes for all kinds of "top-flood" ...
    2. +12
      19 June 2018 18: 41
      Gaddafi kept his money in neutral Switzerland. helped a lot?
      1. +4
        19 June 2018 18: 59
        he needed to invest them as the leader of the DPRK in special forces (Korean saboteurs are some of the best in the world in terms of fanaticism and a non-standard approach — remember killing the Korean leader’s brother with a lighter with a BOV loaded there, instead of methane) and then he would have survived to this day .
      2. 0
        19 June 2018 19: 18
        The dead man was too prudent, unfortunately. In the meantime, they are robbing Abramovich, everyone is even pleased.
    3. +1
      19 June 2018 20: 18
      “Citizens, keep money in a savings bank!” Unless, of course, you have them. ” laughing
      1. +1
        19 June 2018 22: 12
        By the way, after all, citizens once stored in a savings bank, and then perestroika came with the market, and the money together with the savings bank ran away from the citizens so that they still don’t catch. Here and think after that where to store, if of course they are ...
        1. 0
          20 June 2018 07: 00
          Store in a bank. Three liter.
  3. +4
    19 June 2018 18: 07
    Well, what else can you expect from a court of adversary?
  4. +7
    19 June 2018 18: 09
    At least a carcass, even a stuffed animal. One word shameless woman. And most importantly, the brothers knew who to turn to. The main holiday of football is to spoil. angry nothing boomerang will return.
    1. +1
      19 June 2018 21: 35
      will not return - everything has long been decided and divided.
  5. +4
    19 June 2018 18: 10
    It is worth recalling that Gazprom is one of the main sponsors of the FIFA World Cup in Russia. In this tournament, takes part and the England team. Thus, the London court is going to strike at its own football team, whose participation along with other teams in the final stage of the World Cup 2018 does not do without sponsorship from the Russian gas giant?
    Oh, it’s already funny ... When did Russia’s problems worry England? She will only be glad for our problems.
    1. +2
      19 June 2018 20: 07
      Quote: svp67
      She will only be glad for our problems.

      Officially, she will sympathize. And continue to create them further! good
  6. +10
    19 June 2018 18: 18
    Gazprom is not afraid of anything, gas (at our place) will go up by five rubles and compensate for everything
    1. +1
      19 June 2018 22: 14
      Indeed, we will not notice. Against the background of retirement age, these couple of rubles to oilmen who suffered from sanctions are even a joy ..
  7. +3
    19 June 2018 18: 20
    Is a London court going to strike at its own football team, whose participation, along with other teams in the final stage of the 2018 World Cup, cannot do without sponsorship from the Russian gas giant?

    What's this? A subtle hint of Gazprom’s intention in response to a freeze of assets to freeze all GB players at the 2018 World Cup. In vain the British stuttered about freezing. Gazprom has okromya LNG and liquid nitrogen.
  8. +11
    19 June 2018 18: 24
    So, we need to “freeze” British assets in Russia and stop pumping gas to Britain. It's time to teach the brazen islanders a lesson in ethics and "aesthetics."
    1. +1
      19 June 2018 19: 17
      Quote: 1536
      stop pumping gas to Britain

      Gzprom rivals applaud standing up to such a wise decision! They just do not come up with any moves in order to reduce our share in the European market, and here we ourselves will fly a white flag --- come on, dear competitors, we have set you free a place!
      1. +5
        19 June 2018 20: 11
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        Gzprom rivals applaud standing up to such a wise decision!

        If you continue to sit on the export of hydrocarbons, then you are conditionally right.
        But I do not understand - “our” government does not understand at all that one cannot lay eggs in one (Gazprom) basket?
        1. +1
          19 June 2018 21: 14
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          But I do not understand - “our” government does not understand at all that one cannot lay eggs in one (Gazprom) basket?

          There is nothing wrong with selling resources. Another question: what is the mechanism of work of such structures and what is the profit invested in. You can write about offshore deals and laying companies for a long time, and profits are invested in non-feeble support of professional sports, too, and it would be better to develop or buy technology than the extraordinarily famous football stars. These blacks will be dumped at the very first time or at the end of the contract, and here the factory will stand still.
          And the "government" is people from another planet, you do not offend them with quotes))) We are not given to understand their strategy, I think that because of the lack thereof. They are hammered by sanctions, and they want to accept senators, and so on. I'm tired of, honestly, look at these circuses. They have stuck in the West with all their economic gadgets, and now they are trying to respond to economic blows with an equivalent answer .... what can I say about this epic battle? The initiative is completely on the side of the enemy, and our hooks are kind of sluggish and do not break through the fattened western muzzle.
  9. +4
    19 June 2018 18: 39
    The last paragraph killed me at all ... Here the English team will cry then! ....
    1. +3
      19 June 2018 19: 53
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      The last paragraph killed me at all ... Here the English team will cry then! ....

      the forecast level is very strange. Sponsors have already invested! And what is the matter of the national team to the investments of sponsors, if the match is already underway?
      There is probably more of a psychological trick! Wait kaaaak angry and it will be bad for the English team ....
  10. +2
    19 June 2018 18: 56
    Some lolas, I would immediately have fully nationalized all foreign assets and companies on the territory of Russia (McDonald's and everything else, half of the business there belongs to the West) Venezuela did this when they added up, why can't we?
    1. 0
      19 June 2018 21: 40
      such a feeling, the country is ruled by the anti-people union of the oligarchs of the world, well, they are sharing something there.
      for the people, so as not to think prelude, discontent and some notes of protest.
      Well, politics, it was smaller than us - why should the natural resources belonging in the course of the world government be shared with the natives ...
      here is what else I saw
      http://emperoruniverse.blogspot.com/2017/01/blog-
      post_19.html
    2. 0
      20 June 2018 07: 07
      Nationalization, if it is not accompanied by mass executions, is half measures. Comandante Chávez and Comandante Maduro did not take this into account, because now people in Venezuela live a curly neckline after this nationalization.

      And in general, comrade nationalizer - are you ready that in response global corporations will ban the supply to the Russian Federation, for example, components for computers? Where then will you go to VO?
      1. -1
        21 June 2018 03: 42
        Components China may itself stop supplying anyone (even in the Pentagon, as it turned out, Chinese components in the PC)
        1. +1
          21 June 2018 19: 37
          I think that if China already begins to drive the leftist absolutely infinitely, then it will simply be blocked by legal Western markets. And without them, China will bend because there is no effective demand domestically.

          The second world economy became the second only because the first world economy transferred its production there ...
          1. -1
            21 June 2018 21: 24
            PPP GDP is a more accurate calculation (taking into account the difference in salaries and prices across countries, as well as the cost of services, where, say, a haircut in the USA costs $ 100, which is why the figures for nominal GDP “go off scale”). So China is a strong leader in the global economy (yes, although look at how much everything is produced and mined there, for example, China produces more cement per year than the United States produced for the entire 20th century)
  11. +4
    19 June 2018 19: 02
    Gopniks froze assets at thieves. I don’t know whether to rejoice or to grieve? Is gas now more expensive in Russia
    1. +3
      19 June 2018 20: 14
      Quote: Million
      Is it that gas will now rise in price in Russia

      Already, at least propane. Previously, it was burned out as a by-product of oil refining.
    2. +1
      19 June 2018 22: 03
      they didn’t share it)) wassat
  12. +3
    19 June 2018 19: 08
    The banal transfer of billions from Moscow Jews to the Bnite-Brit Jews.
    1. +2
      19 June 2018 19: 38
      The ignoble answer is ignoramus, having no idea what the correct name is Bnei Brit. Second Year.
      1. +3
        19 June 2018 20: 15
        Quote: mumhe
        Second Year.

        And as usual, nit-picking is not to the point, but to grammatical errors. All according to the catechism! Keep it up! good
  13. +1
    19 June 2018 19: 12
    Thus, the London court is going to strike at its own football team, whose participation, along with other teams in the final stage of the World Cup 2018 is not complete without sponsorship from the Russian gas giant?
    And you can in more detail --- exactly how the English team will suffer?)))
    For some reason, I’m sure that the championship will be held at the highest level on our part and that all obligations will be fulfilled. This game is presented too much as a significant political tool. But this is essentially a sports festival, today here --- tomorrow there.
    And powerful tools are military and economic power and allies acting according to a single plan. Therefore, London decided to strike at our economic power and no “leather ball” will prevent this.
  14. +2
    19 June 2018 19: 14
    To freeze Europe next winter is the most intelligible (so that it’s right on the head, to reach) answer. Latch for sweets - always at the ready.
    1. +2
      19 June 2018 20: 19
      Quote: Sergey-8848
      the most intelligible (so that it’s right on the head, to reach) option
      The most intelligible option is to develop your production, and perceive the income from gas-oil exports as a premium, and not as the main form of earnings. hi
      1. +3
        19 June 2018 21: 03
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        The most intelligible option is to develop your production, and perceive the income from gas-oil exports as a premium, and not as the main form of earnings. hi

        No, it's too troublesome. Ours will not go for it.
        1. +2
          19 June 2018 21: 05
          Quote: ALEXXX1983
          Ours will not go for it.

          Is it ours then?
      2. +2
        19 June 2018 21: 29
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        The most intelligible option is to develop your production

        Due to what, excuse me? What did you intend to produce, where will you sell it? Or "to the warehouse", as in the Union? Burn, don’t go to the grandmother ...
        And his production, real and competitive, and now they are developing. At the expense of money from the same oil and gas, in particular.
        And they do a lot of other useful things. For the same, by the way, money. Well, it so happened, under the Union, that we really can’t sell anything except raw materials.
        And in order to buy a thread that is unnecessary (equipment for your same "productions", for example), you need to sell a thread that is unnecessary ... you need to know the classics wink
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Is it ours then?

        Definitely not yours. They are not interested in the theory of the world conspiracy (and other horse-Spyrology ... for example.
        Incidentally, I, too ... don't get carried away.
        1. 0
          20 June 2018 07: 43
          Well hello kitty!
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          What do you intend to produce, where to sell will you?
          As usual, something to blurt out. wink Do you represent the volume of the domestic market in Russia? It is now 80-90% full of imported goods.
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          And their production, real and competitive, is now being developed. At the expense of money from the same oil and gas, in particular.

          For instance? The defense industry does not count.
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          And in order to buy a thread that is unnecessary (equipment for your same "productions", for example), you need to sell a thread that is unnecessary ... you need to know the classics

          So I am about the same! But neftegazodollary invested for some reason, for the most part, not in Russia. And the cape has already discussed this. wink
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          Definitely not yours. They are not interested in the theory of the world conspiracy (and other horse-Spyrology ... for example.

          Of course, because for them this is not a theory, but a practice! good
  15. +4
    19 June 2018 19: 22
    Voot, there is an asset that must be arrested for a long time-Echo of Moscow. It's about time.
    1. +1
      19 June 2018 19: 37
      In, in, in the parcel roll up, piece by piece, and on the British, on the islands ... we will not go broke on express delivery, in a container ship and at a slow speed!
  16. +1
    19 June 2018 19: 40
    commercial court of london
    Who is it more crazy?
  17. +2
    19 June 2018 19: 53
    The decision of Gazprom - to freeze England is possible and necessary. laughing
  18. +1
    19 June 2018 20: 03
    This music will not play long. One and a half years to the horses left.
  19. +4
    19 June 2018 20: 17
    It's time to hold a referendum on the theme: natural gas and oil - only to Russian citizens!
    1. +2
      19 June 2018 20: 34
      Quote: NordUral
      It's time to hold a referendum on the theme: natural gas and oil - only to Russian citizens!

      Citizens of Russia, God forbid, to leave "St. George's Day."
    2. 0
      19 June 2018 20: 40
      You will personally be allocated a barrel of 150 liters of oil and four propane bologna - you will use it.
      1. +2
        19 June 2018 21: 00
        Quote: Vadim237
        You will personally be allocated a barrel of 150 liters of oil and four propane bologna - you will use it.

        In Turkmenistan, about a hundred liters of gasoline are allocated to Toyota Corolla per month, and for free. If the owner spends more, then refuel at his own expense, somewhere around 5 rubles (ours) per liter. Gas is free, housing is free, housing and utilities are free.
        You can say that there is a totalitarian regime, and in reality everything is bad. But Vadim - didn’t you think that people were running from where it was bad? And now the answer is - have you seen many Turkmen guest workers? I am alone, although I used to work in the markets, and now in construction sites. hi
        1. +1
          19 June 2018 21: 48
          Do you know why you killed Muammar Gadaffi?
          not for the oil or wealth of the country, but for the precedent.
          so that people don’t think. that they can live well on their land, everything belongs to the world oligarchy (even the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers rest)
        2. 0
          19 June 2018 23: 30
          But Turkmenistan and Russia don’t need to be compared - 5 million people live in one country, almost 150 million live in another and the infrastructure in Russia is quite extensive and expensive to maintain, and therefore there will never be free housing and communal services, fuel and other things in Russia.
          1. +1
            20 June 2018 07: 46
            Quote: Vadim237
            Only, Turkmenistan and Russia don’t need to be compared - 5 million people live in one country, almost 150 million live in another

            Compare the same territory. And compare the volume of mineral reserves and their structure.
            1. 0
              20 June 2018 09: 48
              And here are the fossils - we have a hundred times more expenses than they have for infrastructure and so on.
          2. 0
            20 June 2018 19: 17
            but will there be thousands of near-Kremlin devils sitting on the oil industry and getting millions a day?
            all the average salary in the country! and then enough for everyone.
      2. 0
        19 June 2018 21: 44
        monthly for a family, I agree. wassat
  20. 0
    19 June 2018 20: 34
    The decision of the London court: to freeze the assets of "Gazprom" can and should be

    Gazprom managers simply snickered: "For that, there is a pike in the river so that crucian carp does not doze off."
  21. +2
    19 June 2018 20: 51
    I don’t know about the Ukrainians, but the fact that some lawyers will profit from this case, do not go to the grandmother.
  22. +1
    19 June 2018 21: 09
    I read the comments, the fifth column arranged a brawl.
  23. 0
    19 June 2018 21: 16
    Muler Loshara !!!
  24. 0
    19 June 2018 21: 50
    Quote: YarSer88
    In Spain, everyone doesn’t care about your capital, if only the investments go, which suits everyone.

    So it was in Britain. Until a certain point.
  25. +1
    19 June 2018 22: 03
    They are ready to shit on their own heads if only in Russia they smell shit.
  26. +1
    19 June 2018 22: 57
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Smart people, after the decision of the Stockholm court, have already withdrawn loot from there. Is there still Gazprom loot in London. If there is, then Miller LOCH!

    Add a pedal! And maybe a little corrupt!
    1. 0
      19 June 2018 23: 33
      No, suckers pedals are guys who do not run a state corporation, but can only manage the clave and the stool on which they sit.
  27. 0
    20 June 2018 00: 49
    For the first time I do not read comments, and I say - tear each other as you want. After the “attempt” to raise the retirement age (and after systematizing all the “good” things for the people), it is clear that the resources of our country and all the power were simply seized by criminal scum.
    1. -2
      20 June 2018 04: 32
      Tell me how much taxes do you pay?
      1. 0
        20 June 2018 07: 03
        Quote: NG inform
        Tell me how much taxes do you pay?

        Are you talking to me? I can tell you how much money is taken out of the land and the people. And you tell me how much is "invested". May you see clearly.
        1. -1
          20 June 2018 21: 42
          Yes to you. So how many taxes are there?
  28. 0
    20 June 2018 01: 52
    Rather, there is nothing in London and the decision in favor of ukrobaran, like WE WITH YOU or FOR YOU. wassat
  29. 0
    20 June 2018 03: 10
    Who would doubt that !!! “Long live, the fairest London court” —that is all the Geyropean “values”.
  30. 0
    20 June 2018 04: 02
    Thus, the London court is going to strike at its own football team, whose participation, along with other teams in the final stage of the World Cup 2018 is not complete without sponsorship from the Russian gas giant?
    How so? What a blow? What nonsense is this?
  31. -2
    20 June 2018 04: 32
    This looks especially good against the background of the Ukrainian default on loans given to Yanyk.
  32. +1
    20 June 2018 07: 15
    “It is worth recalling that Gazprom is one of the main sponsors of the FIFA World Cup in Russia. The England team is also participating in this tournament. Thus, a London court is going to strike at its own football team, which, along with other teams, will participate in the final stage of the 2018 World Cup is not complete without sponsorship from the Russian gas giant? "- WHAT FOR CHILDREN'S CHEEP? !!!
  33. 0
    20 June 2018 11: 04
    You can laugh for a long time and more fun. But there is one small BUT! Here it is (the Svea Court of Appeal actually reversed the decision of the Stockholm arbitration to arrest Gazprom assets outside Russia.) Complete crap and profanity. And so offhand, some country in South America also cheerfully sent the decision of the judiciary to one place without stinging to pay. as a result, ALL accounts in offshore were arrested. And this country, having an over a lot of oil, sits with outstretched hand and does not have food for its fellow citizens. Miller does everything under the tracing. even a thought creeps in and not a State Department spokesman by chance?
    1. 0
      25 June 2018 15: 05
      Quote: dgonni
      full crap and profanity. And so offhand, some country in South America also cheerfully sent judicial decisions to one place

      How crazy you are !!!! Have you come up with?
      They took Argentina by the ears, and the problems are in Venezuela, but to the Ukrainian it is as if the same thing.
      And yes, do not store money in dollars - it will be for you a simple human right now.
  34. 0
    20 June 2018 12: 28
    Quote: Albert1988
    Quote: YarSer88
    How many times does a roasted rooster have to peck so that they already understand that it is most reliable to keep money in Spain or neutral countries like Switzerland and Luxembourg?

    Money must be stored in RUSSIA! Because if the left heel of the first secretary of the Washington regional committee wants, then both Spain and Luxembourg with Switzerland will bend over vigorously in all the necessary poses ... Look, how quickly Muammurchik Gaddafi’s accounts were frozen.


    And I think that money should not be stored, but should be in circulation, work for the country, for its own economy.
  35. 0
    20 June 2018 19: 53
    The decision of the London court: to freeze the assets of "Gazprom" can and should be


    It's time, because every citizen knows that Gazprom is NOT a public asset
  36. 0
    21 June 2018 06: 57
    It’s necessary to pour these brazen minds of the mind through the back gate, closer to winter, stop all energy supplies to the Naglosaks island and let yourself jump like a puppy, and then we'll see what else to please them with.
  37. 0
    25 June 2018 14: 57
    Ingvar 72,
    What is your interesting reality! ..