American expert: submarines "Ohio" will respond to America's nuclear destruction

116
American edition The National Interest publishes material reporting on the "Achilles Heel of the United States." The Achilles heel, according to David Pyne, the author of the material, is nuclear disparity. Pine, who holds a master's degree in national security research at Georgetown University, believes the US needs to start immediately by increasing the pace of its exploitation of submarine fleet with nuclear missiles. In particular, this is the Ohio submarine project.

American expert: submarines "Ohio" will respond to America's nuclear destruction

USS Louisiana submarine (SSBN-743)




From the material:
The best way to strengthen and expand America’s nuclear deterrent in the near term will be to increase the rate of operation of the Ohio submarines from four out of fourteen at sea at any time to ten. This would ensure that more than two thirds of our submarine fleet with a nuclear arsenal could not be destroyed in their ports in a hypothetical preemptive nuclear strike from the enemies of America, giving the United States a much more likely retaliatory strike - 2,5 times more powerful.


According to Pine, an important step that could make Trump, is a step to abandon the "new limitations of the START Treaty." The expert considers the fulfillment of these restrictions “unverifiable”.

Further - typical pathos from the American security specialist:
America is an example for the world and continues to serve as a great bastion of freedom and hope for the hundreds of millions of ordinary people who live under communist and Islamist tyranny and oppression, but America can maintain this status only if Congress now takes measures to protect against the threat of nuclear attacks.


For reference: in open sources it is said that the US submarine fleet is equipped with Ohio-class 18 submarines, whose full missile systems are: 24 Trident II D5 ballistic missiles or 154 Tomahuk cruise missiles.
116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    11 June 2018 07: 47
    "America is an example to the world and continues to serve as a great bastion of freedom and hope for the hundreds of millions of ordinary people who live under communist and Islamist tyranny and oppression, but America can maintain this status only if Congress now takes measures to protect against the threat nuclear attack. " Simply put, to destroy everyone who seems to live differently than they want in the United States. And now you can attach the six here. The whole world is in ruin.
    1. +2
      11 June 2018 08: 17
      Another scarecrow about the Russian nuclear threat. And it’s hard not to feed the military-industrial complex. winked
      1. +5
        11 June 2018 09: 43
        Quote: siberalt
        Another scarecrow about the Russian nuclear threat. And the military-industrial complex is difficult not to feed

        Well, after unveiling Uncle Vova’s surprises, Ohio is really one valid argument. The same Poseidon, naturally for the attack of megacities and bases, including the location of the nuclear submarines. The same Vanguard and the Kyrgyz Republic with YaSU, etc. Naturally, in order to maintain the potential of a guaranteed response, it is necessary to drive out its carriers to the patrol areas.
        1. +11
          11 June 2018 11: 40
          Quote: hrych
          in order to maintain the potential of a guaranteed response, it is necessary to drive out its carriers to the patrol areas.

          Hello old man! hi
          And so it is, but there is a cycle of use of forces, that is: carrying BS, after-trip software and preventive maintenance, rest and crew training, docking, repairs ... And all this translates into KON PLARB. The Amov have two crews, but the "horse" is one. Therefore, it will not last so long: “Bolivar will not stand two!” (C).
          And the fact that during the period of danger all combat-ready forces will run up along their own RBDs, so even without this “master” the command of the submarine forces of the US Navy is known.
          So, this is for civilians, for reassurance, for the need of the day. But the Pentagon’s hemorrhoids are different: they are naked in front of Uncle Vova’s new mallet. That's the problem! And by old means this problem cannot be solved.
          Somehow, however.
          1. +1
            11 June 2018 12: 37
            Hello Serpent Wise! drinks
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            "Bolivar can't stand two!"

        2. +2
          11 June 2018 16: 39
          Well, after unveiling Uncle Vova’s surprises, Ohio is really one valid argument.


          But Mr. Pine did not specify where the nuclear submarines will return after an exchange of blows.
    2. +4
      11 June 2018 08: 18
      Again the Russian threat? As everything is old and stereotyped .. Maybe still try to agree with Russia gentlemen? That's just on an equal footing and honestly (and not like in 80-90 with humpback and EBN) We now can’t get us into "your shit, etc.) Watering is also a planet .. Your nuclear submarines are certainly cool, no words, but ours also know how to track them .. Let's negotiate with everyone in the world! hi
      1. +2
        11 June 2018 19: 45
        Quote: DRA-75
        Again the Russian threat? As everything is old and stereotyped .. Maybe still try to agree with Russia gentlemen? That's just on an equal footing and honestly (and not like in 80-90 with humpback and EBN) We now can’t get us into "your shit, etc.) Watering is also a planet .. Your nuclear submarines are certainly cool, no words, but ours also know how to track them .. Let's negotiate with everyone in the world! hi

        What for? The Union was much more powerful than the Russian Federation, but was "untwisted". They want to "untwist" the Russian Federation to the level of "specific principalities", which the Bolsheviks at one time prevented, but now they are gone. Do you think state capitalism, which is now being built, will save? There will be the same stagnation as under Brezhnev. And what happened then, you probably know. Only then did we have a giant backlog of the Union behind us, and now? So there is no need for them to negotiate with us, as they consider.
      2. 0
        17 June 2018 23: 14
        DRA-75
        No equal. The states ended their hegemony and verbiage with terrorism. They only obediently ask for forgiveness from Russia and China. And crawl at our feet.
    3. 0
      11 June 2018 09: 29
      The United States wants to rid the world of dictatorial regimes, Russia is trying to maintain such regimes as the USSR did. The struggle of good and evil.
      1. +13
        11 June 2018 09: 52
        Quote: Andriy Πrivals
        The United States wants to rid the world of dictatorial regimes, Russia is trying to maintain such regimes as the USSR did. The struggle of good and evil.


        The word Russia is capitalized, Andrei

        And the regimes of dictators
        Saudi Arabia
        Qatar
        Ukraine
        And other

        Isn't the US trying to save?

        Russia is not trying to save the dictators, and does not propose using aircraft carriers with Tomahawks, terrorist entities such as ISIS * or the Right Sector * and coups, but a peaceful settlement


        * ISIS and Right Sector organizations are banned in the Russian Federation and will be destroyed
        1. +1
          11 June 2018 09: 58
          Quote: bulvas
          Quote: Andriy Πrivals
          The United States wants to rid the world of dictatorial regimes, Russia is trying to maintain such regimes as the USSR did. The struggle of good and evil.


          The word Russia is capitalized, Andriy

          And the regimes of dictators
          Saudi Arabia
          Qatar
          Ukraine
          And other

          Isn't the US trying to save?

          Russia does not try to save dictators, but proposes to use not peaceful carriers with Tomahawks and terrorist formations, but a peaceful settlement

          Andriy simply did not notice them, as did the staff! stop
        2. 0
          11 June 2018 10: 04
          The United States is constantly pushing for human rights reforms in these countries and reforms are being successfully implemented in countries like CA and Qatar. Ukraine is out of place here, in Ukraine there is no dictatorship, but rather anarcho-capitalism.
          Russia is trying to maintain dictatorial regimes and when it grants loans to other countries it never asks for democratic reforms, only authoritarian regimes are friends with Russia.
          1. +6
            11 June 2018 10: 05
            Quote: Andriy Uryvalov
            The United States is constantly pushing for human rights reforms in these countries and reforms are being successfully implemented in countries like CA and Qatar.


            All reforms in these countries are multi-billion dollar arms purchases in the United States.
            If they don’t want to buy weapons, the United States will bomb them, kill millions of people and destroy the country

            So it was everywhere and always where the USA came
          2. +4
            11 June 2018 10: 15
            Quote: Andriy Πrivals
            The United States is constantly pushing for human rights reforms in these countries and reforms are being successfully implemented in countries like CA and Qatar. Ukraine is out of place here, in Ukraine there is no dictatorship, but rather anarcho-capitalism.
            Russia is trying to maintain dictatorial regimes and when it grants loans to other countries it never asks for democratic reforms, only authoritarian regimes are friends with Russia.

            Reforms in Saudi Arabia?! How heads chopped and chopped! Like little women in burqa walked, and walk! And try to say something about the dominant religion there! Well, I'll see what happens to you. am
          3. +3
            11 June 2018 11: 22
            Do not disgrace more and so ashamed that you are Ukrainian.
            1. +5
              11 June 2018 12: 41
              Quote: DVTamga
              Do not disgrace more and so ashamed that you are Ukrainian.

              It’s not a shame that the Ukrainian, but the fact that the Ukrainian will smash such garbage ... Although ... everywhere there are enough of their "alternatively gifted" ...
            2. 0
              11 June 2018 21: 40
              Quote: DVTamga
              Do not disgrace more and so ashamed that you are Ukrainian.

              Where is this Andriy Prival visitor1 - Ukrainian?
              1. +1
                13 June 2018 06: 46
                The term "Ukrainian" in the modern sense does not apply to nationality. Ukrainian is a common noun and a synonym for traitor, scum, liar and policeman. This is historically the case. Therefore, in all places and in every sense, this humanoid is Ukrainian.
                1. 0
                  13 June 2018 15: 15
                  Quote: DVTamga
                  Ukrainian is a common noun and a synonym for traitor, scum, liar and policeman.

                  Sorry, but this is sheer crap, you have some wrong, disgusting synonyms.
                  Those whom you so passionately describe joined Ukraine before the war itself (the Great Patriotic War) and are not Ukrainians.
                  Quote: DVTamga
                  So historically.

                  History needs to be better taught.
                  1. 0
                    15 June 2018 11: 00
                    Crap is what is happening in Ukraine at the moment (Ividimouvasvgolove). Ukrainians - such a nationality does not exist. It's like the Americans - a different rabble from different nationalities and nations, well, or like the Russians. Look deeper and it will be clear who and what these "Ukrainians" are. I give a tattoo - Initially, it was generally either a type of party, or a bunch of homosexuals with a Polish bias, calling themselves Ukrainians. Well, then ... although why am I going to break spears here. If you want to know, find out, no, I don’t care, I don’t argue with fools. So there is a desire - learn the materiel))))). Yes, and history does not need to be taught; you are not begging for a grade three at school. History needs to KNOW!
                    1. +1
                      15 June 2018 13: 42
                      Quote: DVTamga
                      Ukrainians - such a nationality does not exist.

                      So what? The Russians also do not have such a nationality. This is citizenship.
                      Quote: DVTamga
                      Initially, it was generally either a type of party, or a bunch of homosexuals with a Polish bias, calling themselves Ukrainians.

                      What are fascist ideas? Do you know that there are nine (u) krajins in Russia?
                      Altay
                      Kamchatka
                      Khabarovsk Krai
                      Krasnodar
                      Krasnoyarsk Territory
                      Perm
                      Primorsky Krai
                      Stavropol region
                      Trans-Baikal Territory
                      And all the inhabitants of these regions are Ukrainians.
                      1. 0
                        17 June 2018 23: 25
                        In Old Russian, the Ukrainian is a border guard.
                  2. 0
                    17 June 2018 23: 33
                    DVTamga
                    That is, modern history must be known. How over the past 20 years, Ukrainians have turned (by no means all) into scum.
          4. +1
            17 June 2018 23: 36
            Quote: Andriy Uryvalov
            U.S. constantly insists on human rights reform

            Quote: Andriy Uryvalov
            Russia ... never asks for democratic reforms

            I have one feeling that either a student or a person with a reduced, ahem, intelligence level will come?
      2. +2
        11 June 2018 10: 00
        Quote: Andriy Πrivals
        The United States wants to rid the world of dictatorial regimes, Russia is trying to maintain such regimes as the USSR did. The struggle of good and evil.

        Oh, and is drawn to ask who you personify good and who evil. stop
        1. +4
          11 June 2018 10: 04
          Quote: Phil77
          Quote: Andriy Πrivals
          The United States wants to rid the world of dictatorial regimes, Russia is trying to maintain such regimes as the USSR did. The struggle of good and evil.

          Oh, and is drawn to ask who you personify good and who evil. stop


          for sixes faithful to their master, the master is good
          Sixes do not see beyond the fence exhibited by the owner and do not hear anything except the voice of the owner.


          I would not like to give dogs as an example, I love and respect them, but when people and entire countries start to take dogs as examples, it turns out Poland, Lithuania or Ukraine
          1. 0
            11 June 2018 10: 11
            So I am about the same!
            1. +1
              11 June 2018 10: 12
              hi
              Quote: Phil77
              So I am about the same!



              understandably!

              My answer was for Andrey
              1. +1
                11 June 2018 10: 19
                I agree. I understand you. hi
              2. +1
                11 June 2018 11: 29
                Quote: bulvas
                hi
                Quote: Phil77
                So I am about the same!



                understandably!

                My answer was for Andrey

                Only it seems he is not Andrei, namely, Andrei! bully
                1. +1
                  11 June 2018 11: 43
                  Quote: Phil77
                  Only it seems he is not Andrei, namely, Andrei!


                  I agree, a traitor, seduced on a little panel
                  1. +4
                    11 June 2018 12: 50
                    The current andriyam just enough panties mantels. If only they were lace. laughing
      3. +3
        11 June 2018 11: 20
        I wrote from the training manual, earned a piece of Zhinka on the little hearts.
      4. 0
        17 June 2018 23: 21
        Andriy Πrivals
        I wanted terrorism, my hands are itching. You want the dictatorship of the USA over the whole World. Late Andriy Urivals. The states now look like a worn horse.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      17 June 2018 23: 08
      Yeah, fresh tradition. Like they were on the moon with the help of Kubrick, they remained idiots. Where do they get their cogs after the defeat of the American continent. Will they ask us to Russia? All their strength against Russia is in verbiage and ascribing to themselves all the super-duper.
  2. +3
    11 June 2018 07: 56
    The defense of democracy is a terrible affair. For the rest of the "undemocratic" world and the entire planet. am
  3. +1
    11 June 2018 07: 57
    Whack Whack. Give me some more money)
  4. +3
    11 June 2018 08: 00
    Since the days of Al Capone there is a common pearl - with the help of Colt and a good word, you can achieve more than with a single good word.
    Nothing changes.

    As you are to people, so are they to you.
  5. +3
    11 June 2018 08: 02
    The United States may be wary of the unpredictable actions of Britain and France, which have fought among themselves for centuries and continue to pursue their old divide-and-conquer policy. The growing neo-fascism in Germany is also dangerous. And the Germans are quite capable of capturing the nuclear weapons of the Americans stationed in Germany. Canada and Mexico are so unreliable neighbors that they are ready to seize the US border in one day. In general, it turns out that the States in the ring, if not enemies, then inadequate neighbors and "partners." How do we know this ...
    1. +3
      11 June 2018 08: 14
      Quote: 1536
      The United States may be wary of the unpredictable actions of Britain and France, which have fought among themselves for centuries and continue to pursue their old divide-and-conquer policy. The growing neo-fascism in Germany is also dangerous.

      It seems not Friday, but a similar point of view is impressive! lol
      Quote: 1536
      How do we know this

      And here you are mistaken ... in the USSR it was customary to trust the allies, if only because they could not control 100% and American banks, special services could ...
      1. 0
        11 June 2018 19: 35
        Dear, it would be time for you to leave the USSR, otherwise soon the “perestroika” will begin there.
      2. 0
        17 June 2018 23: 41
        himRa
        Yes, quit. Russia has already sold 50% of US securities. And the whole world will soon bury dollars.
        1. 0
          17 June 2018 23: 48
          Quote: Anatoly R
          Russia has already sold 50% of US securities

          And they were immediately bought up by other market participants, no?
          Quote: Anatoly R
          And the whole world will bury dollars soon

          Brrrrrrrr belay
  6. +1
    11 June 2018 08: 04
    First, regain your hegemony, gentlemen striatum. Silenok is not enough ... Relaxed ...
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      11 June 2018 08: 27
      With the submarine fleet, they are doing well!
      At least, "not worse" than ours)))
      Count the number, pace of construction, KOH, finally ..
    2. +1
      11 June 2018 08: 33
      Quote: Vard
      Something tells me .... Not everything is so good with the submarine fleet ... As this scribbler writes ...

      Somewhere in some movie remember the phrase:
      -well says hell!
      -Now they will beat him! laughing
      probably a premonition that they will kick when they are weakened .... here they go ...
  8. +2
    11 June 2018 08: 23
    The Achilles heel, according to David Pyne, the author of the material, is nuclear disparity. Pyne believes that the United States needs to immediately begin to increase the rate of operation of the submarine nuclear fleet with nuclear missiles. In particular, this refers to the Ohio submarine project.

    Which indicates the insolvency of the remaining components of the nuclear triad. And this, in turn, cannot but rejoice.
    1. +1
      11 June 2018 11: 54
      Quote: 123456789
      on the insolvency of the remaining components of the nuclear triad.

      "Well, damn it, you give!" (with)
      1. 0
        17 June 2018 23: 45

        This is history. And it will happen again.
  9. 0
    11 June 2018 08: 53
    Interestingly, and on NI, Topwar is also discussed every day?
    1. 0
      11 June 2018 09: 54
      The National Interest magazine is owned by Kremlin political analyst Dmitry Simes, who runs talk shows on Solovyov and Channel One. This explains why more than 90% of all news about Russian weapons in the West is written by only one magazine.
      The Russian media often quote NI often, since most articles in NI contribute to pumping jingoistic feelings among Russians in the style of "American experts recognized the superiority of Russia," "the United States was frightened of Russian weapons." This pseudo-analytics is put on the conveyor and Dmitry Simes makes money on it.
      1. +3
        11 June 2018 12: 30
        Quote: Andriy Uryvalov
        "American experts recognized the superiority of Russia," "in the United States, they were afraid of Russian weapons."

        Privalov! But once on this thread you were already pointed out to illiteracy in the spelling of proper names in Russian!
        What can’t you learn? So "incomprehensible" or stubborn to the impossibility that Russia write in uppercase, and ju - only in capital letters !?
        (Yes, my friend, literate! (C).
      2. +1
        11 June 2018 13: 06
        And your real name is not "Bulba"? And then the text is very similar
  10. +7
    11 June 2018 09: 10
    I don’t want to upset the master of sour cabbage soup Payne, but the affairs of the mattresses with their strategic underwater potential are very bad. Boats are seriously outdated and out of 14 and six are in chronic repair, so only 8 come out, i.e. two fours change, but this is not the main problem. More importantly, the Ohio is not capable of volley more than two Tridents, and with an interval of a minute or more, a single-hull design feature (but we can all 16). Well, now the question is: what are Omerians capable of at all, what is the equivalent response to destruction? Yes, with the strategists, too, everything is not going smoothly yet, but we have the most powerful Strategic Missile Forces, and they still have only one-headed Minutemans, 40-year-olds. Who will guarantee that everything in Amer’s warheads does not burn out? And there is nothing to replace, therefore they pretend to be dressed, covering the ass with mug and leaving 5-kiloton fuses, such as upgraded. And the king is naked! I think that not one thought is born of me: how can they deliver 100 RS-28 and the remaining 5 Boreevs - to fuck this evil spirits and finally rid the Earth of the greatest evil - the USA? Naturally, unlike the overseas evil spirits, we will not do this, even if we know that we are guaranteed to win. BUT SHOWING OUR FORCE AND THEIR WEAKNESS IS NECESSARY!
    1. +1
      11 June 2018 09: 41
      Quote: Sarmat Sanych
      I think that not one thought is born of me: how can they deliver 100 RS-28 and the remaining 5 Boreevs - to fuck this evil spirits and finally rid the Earth of the greatest evil - the USA? Naturally, unlike overseas evil spirits, we will not do this, even if we know that we are guaranteed to win. BUT SHOWING OUR FORCE AND THEIR WEAKNESS IS NECESSARY!

      I confirm ....not one
      But I also understand that a similar situation was simulated for sure ....
      and ... of course I believe that we never have such nezdelaem! I swear by my mother! laughing
    2. +2
      11 June 2018 09: 55
      "out of 14, six are in chronic repair, so only 8 come out, that is, two fours change." ///

      You did not realize, as usual, that this is the highest fighting efficiency, above which there is no world.
      Repairs are not called chronic, but regular periodic.
      6 on repair and maintenance, 8 on alert, 4 of them at sea, 4 at the pier.
      In Russia, one or two boats a year goes on combat duty. Most
      constantly at the pier.
      1. +4
        11 June 2018 12: 42
        Quote: voyaka uh
        In Russia, one or two boats a year goes on combat duty. Most
        constantly at the pier.

        It was once. Data is out of date. This is the first.
        Secondly, our rkksn old, so they are saving motor resources. However, if necessary, they will get all the assigned goals from the pier.
        Boreas are on their way, so do not worry, especially. But something about SSN-X has not been heard for a long time ... How is it on paper ... does it fit? Or is the tsiferk not enough for designing in 3-D ??? bully
        1. -1
          11 June 2018 13: 02
          The Columbia (SSBN-826) class program.
          All according to plan. Congress approved the budget in 2017. Contractors selected at tenders. In 2021, the construction of a series of 12 pieces will begin.
          1. +2
            11 June 2018 18: 39
            And how many little gods will they “bring to mind”? How long is the f - 35 program being implemented? When was Gerald Ford scheduled to go into operation? And how many should have been B - 2? And you know how much more I can ask how much? so, the construction of the series may begin, but more importantly when it ends.
      2. +2
        11 June 2018 13: 06
        Quote: voyaka uh
        highest fighting efficiency, above which there is no world

        Yes, what are you saying ...
        Quote: voyaka uh
        In Russia, one or two boats a year goes on combat duty.

        Yes, what are you saying ... wassat
        The Pentagon Intelligence Service (RUMO) found that throughout the year (2012), Russian "strategists" were able to commit only five "Autonomous regions" from the bases of the Northern and Pacific fleets. This was before the adoption of the fleet of three Boreans (2013-14). Plus, do not forget that we have an average of 70% Strategic Missile Forces, 30% SSBNs. For Americans, the proportion is the opposite. Moreover, we have a mine heavyweight - Voevoda and there are mobile Yars (with separable blocks) with Topol-M. Their mines are represented by a weak middle peasant - Minuteman-3 and all.
        1. 0
          11 June 2018 14: 47
          Your information is for 2012. 6 years ago. Then the budget for
          the fleet was much larger.
          -----
          "And we have a mine heavyweight - Voivode" /////
          -----
          It was. Missiles are in mines without nuclear warheads.
          1. +2
            11 June 2018 14: 56
            Quote: voyaka uh
            It was. Missiles are in mines without nuclear warheads.

            You know better in Israel wassat Actually, 46 units in Orenburg and Krasnoyarsk, at least ten megaton blocks each, one such block is enough to end Israeli statehood wassat Those. 460 blocks at 460 megatons, i.e. almost half gigatons of TNT explosive energy wassat
            1. 0
              11 June 2018 15: 55
              "ie almost half gigatons of explosive energy in the TNT equivalent of wassat" ///
              belay
              Cool ... But this is not. Zero megatons. The warheads were dismantled.
              However, Yars, of course, is a very powerful rocket.
              1. +3
                11 June 2018 16: 28
                Quote: voyaka uh
                Zero megatons. The warheads were dismantled.

                What are you talking about? Stop fantasizing already. They told you that now 46 Voivods are exactly on duty, with ten combat units of one megaton each, and then they will gradually be replaced by Sarmatian. Clear? Or do you, Alexei, have a different reality wassat Flood, outcome, etc. laughing For Americans, such as under the START treaty, we keep 46 governors on duty, but in fact Russia has more than seven dozen such missiles. How much on duty is real - is one of the most protected secrets of the country. Therefore, there can be no accurate information about our strategic forces in the kibbutz wassat They said 46 by 10 blocks, which means 46 by 10 blocks, and maybe more, it definitely does not concern you. wassat
                1. -1
                  11 June 2018 22: 45
                  There are no secrets. There is a Russian-American strategic arms reduction treaty. And it is written there that where, who has it. The governors went under reduction, otherwise Poplar would have to be reduced. And Poplar is more reliable than this junk. Soon there will be no Topol, all will be replaced by Yars. And rightly so, this is a modern reliable rocket.
                  And the Voevod corps (part) is still kept in mines without warheads, hoping to still use them to launch satellites. When they do Sarmat, put a dozen of them in the same mines for intimidation and stop.
                  1. +2
                    11 June 2018 23: 38
                    Quote: voyaka uh
                    The governors went under reduction, otherwise Poplar would have to be reduced. And Poplar is more reliable than this junk

                    Well, what are you talking about? Well, as much as you can. Governor, she is Satan, a liquid rocket, ampouled, can calmly stand on guard for fifty years. Once again I say, it’s the last one (otherwise I’ll just consider it backward) that 46 Governors are on duty with 10 powerful units, everything corresponds to START clearly.
                    Quote: voyaka uh
                    And the Governor’s corps (part) are still kept in mines without warheads

                    You continue to fast this heresy to yourself. May be enough wassat For 2006 there were 74 on duty, now 46. Here are 28 taken off duty and look in conversion for space. Moreover, the UR100UTTH or Stiletto is also returned to service, they are made the carrier of the Vanguard and there are several dozen of them in the warehouse that are not refueling. I repeat, stop grinding and talking nonsense when official data are available. Eat them for health, take them on faith as a covenant wassat
        2. +2
          11 June 2018 18: 42
          We will not forget one small trifle - the Russian SSBN can fire in one gulp right from the pier, you can never go out to sea. But the “Ohio”, which returned from combat patrol and unloaded the “tridents” into the arsenal, can no longer be taken into account - it will not be in time.
    3. -1
      11 June 2018 10: 18
      One Ohio submarine is enough to destroy 90% of Russia's potential. Even one nuclear in the capital can lead to the collapse of the state. The USSR fell apart without any war at all.
      1. +7
        11 June 2018 10: 31
        Destruction of the capital will not lead to the collapse of the state - the capital will move to another city.
      2. +8
        11 June 2018 10: 32
        Andrei, right now I’ll call your father Taras ... He is of you, of that which he begot, of that ... of that ...
        Get out better yourself, from sin laughing
        1. 0
          11 June 2018 11: 26
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          Andrei, right now I’ll call your father Taras ... He is of you, of that which he begot, of that ... of that ...
          Get out better yourself, from sin laughing

          Yeah. And the Cossack is mishandled! Obviously, the site echoed Moscow with an echo! am
          1. +3
            11 June 2018 11: 29
            Quote: Phil77
            zasлanny

            I would have a little differently characterized him ... yes banned because completely request
            And so - ukrotrollyashka vagrant, disposable ... there are many of them.
            And where, damn it, the promised "cons"? recourse
      3. 0
        11 June 2018 11: 26
        And why will Ukraine fall apart? From a sneeze?
      4. +2
        11 June 2018 12: 49
        Quote: Andriy Uryvalov
        One Ohio submarine is enough to destroy 90% of Russia's potential.

        Get hungry, Herod !!
      5. 0
        11 June 2018 13: 10
        Our Ukrainian "Druk" is so young that I have not heard about the existence of such a system as the "Perimeter". She is the "Dead Hand", if in amerovsky.

        In what condition it is now, one can only guess, for this is a mystery behind seven seals. And God forbid it activates, and this will happen without human intervention for the reason that there will be no signal from the president’s nuclear suitcase. And then that’s it. The living will envy the dead, but not for long.

        Yes, we are weaker than NATO. NATO is guaranteed to be able to destroy all life on Earth 7 times, Russia "only" three times, but guaranteed.

        So do not rely on Ohio in anticipation of change. You won’t be able to, even zrada will not, but be a universal northern fur-bearing animal.

        And this is in the worst case scenario for Russia.

        “Why do we need such a world if Russia will not be there”
      6. 0
        11 June 2018 21: 46
        Quote: Andriy Uryvalov
        Even one nuclear in the capital can lead to the collapse of the state.

        Tell a Western state, not a Russian one, to Napoleon how Russia is falling apart without a capital.
    4. +1
      11 June 2018 12: 56
      Quote: Sarmat Sanych
      and they still have only one-headed "Minutemen" 40-year-olds

      In vain you are so about them. Minutemans are very good rockets. Especially on the KVO. In addition, they were modernized several times.
      1. +1
        11 June 2018 21: 47
        Quote: region58
        In vain you are so about them. Minutemans are very good rockets. Especially on the KVO. In addition, they were modernized several times.

        A few years ago, the British fired "minutiae", so they couldn’t get into the right ocean, where did they get to Moscow?
        1. +1
          11 June 2018 23: 12
          Quote: Pollux
          they couldn’t get into the right ocean, where do they get to Moscow?

          Well, let’s share your secret knowledge already ... What "Minutemen" they shot from, from which medium, where they aimed, where they hit ... Or share the cap-hooks ...
          PS Read the comment below the KAA Boa Read ... there is more intelligible ...
          1. 0
            12 June 2018 00: 36
            Quote: region58
            Come on, share your secret knowledge already ...

            Aw, okst, what are such "secret knowledge"? A few years ago, the hype was all over NATO, the British minuten hit the wrong ocean! No secrets, only open sources, I just can’t understand how you missed this interesting event, because you discussed it around the world.
            Quote: region58
            What "Minutemen" were shot, from what medium

            You yourself can easily determine for they have one type of underwater carrier and they have no other missiles.
            PySy I do not remember, maybe the tridents? What did the Americans and the British share there?
            Too lazy to look.
            1. +1
              12 June 2018 02: 44
              Quote: Pollux
              open source only

              SSBN "Venzhens" was supposed to launch the Trident II SLBM from the coast of Florida (Cape Canaveral) towards West. Africa - at a distance of 4.000 NM (warning to ships and aircraft was announced in 3 days - as usual), but, according to a senior source in the Royal Navy, the fired missile deviated from the given trajectory, after which a command was given to self-liquidate .

              The information of this source is described by the English proverb:
              Maybe yes, maybe no, maybe rain, maybe snow.
              Yes, all the same, Minutemans and different oceans do not work when doing things?
              PS Nobody has anything ... everything is past ...
              The U.S. military conducted an unsuccessful launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) ground-based Minuteman III. The rocket launched, but was destroyed 5 minutes after launch. As the command of the Vandenberg Air Force base reported, the design parameters were exceeded, so a self-destruction command was sent from the control center.

              On September 27, during a test of the fleet’s combat readiness, the nuclear submarine Yuri Dolgoruky launched a salvo with two Bulava missiles in the White Sea. One of them self-destructed in the air. The missile does not have any structural defects, according to experts interviewed by Gazeta.Ru, all unsuccessful launches were due to production defects.
    5. +5
      11 June 2018 13: 09
      It is correctly said: "Simplicity is worse than theft!"
      Quote: Sarmat Sanych
      “Ohio” is not capable of volley more than two “Tridents”, and with an interval of a minute or more,
      Nuts shoot in series at 4 products in a salvo. Then a "technological" break and further according to plan. And since the release of all wearable BC is less than the PLO / PRO reaction time, they will fulfill their task. Unless, of course, the tracking of it by our submarine is established. But alas, while this is only possible in the Mediterranean ... And in the bay of St. Lawrence, the hollow is empty ...
      Quote: Sarmat Sanych
      and they still have only one-headed “Minutemen” 40-year-olds. Who will guarantee that everything in Amer’s warheads does not burn out?
      Read about a series of upgrades of carriers and guidance systems, fuel, etc., to understand that the "old horse" will not spoil the furrow ... Otherwise, it would have been sent to the amphibian for a long time.
      Quote: Sarmat Sanych
      leaving fuses 5-kiloton, type upgraded.
      These 5-Kt, as you put it, “fuses” set fire to a thermonuclear charge (lithium deuterite, for example). So, they could leave him only to increase the D launch, although it already provides a solution to the problems. Or, for the installation of point guidance systems, not at the expense of range. Fools are not kept in this department! This is not propaganda and agitation with Ms. Psaki! This is the SAC command!
      Why am I all this? And the fact that underestimating the enemy is the worst of the crimes of a military analyst, leader.
      Hooray hatchery - leave for Murzilka magazine! (of course, if it is still in production) Yes
  11. 0
    11 June 2018 09: 39
    Ohio nuclear submarines will respond to the nuclear destruction of America

    But without America they will still live underwater inhabitants - in the style of Captain Nemo or Ascent from the depths)
  12. 0
    11 June 2018 11: 11
    Quote: bulvas
    example of dogs, I love and respect them, but when people and entire countries start to take an example with dogs, it turns out Poland, Lithuania or Ukraine

    They jackals are the hyenas of Washington! Scavengers and thieves!
  13. +3
    11 June 2018 11: 53
    Quote: Andriy Uryvalov
    The United States wants to rid the world of dictatorial regimes, Russia is trying to maintain such regimes as the USSR did. The struggle of good and evil.

    -------------------------------------
    What dictatorial regimes did the USSR support? Pinochet, Somos, Batista, Franco, black colonels in Greece, Chon Doo-hwan in South Korea? What is the "deliverance" of the United States? Delivering countries in general from any kind of statehood, at the same time from income and infrastructure like in Iraq, Libya, Syria, even from the population? And for Ukraine, the Polish dictatorship was once good, as I understand it?
    1. +1
      11 June 2018 12: 23
      Quote: Altona
      What is the "deliverance" of the United States? Delivering countries in general from any statehood, at the same time from income and infrastructure like in Iraq, Libya, Syria, even from the population?

      Eugene, this is the very rare case when I agree with you good
      А Andriyu I have already called Taas. Bulbu. Here he comes and decides everything Yes
  14. 0
    11 June 2018 11: 56
    Quote: Andriy Uryvalov
    One Ohio submarine is enough to destroy 90% of Russia's potential. Even one nuclear in the capital can lead to the collapse of the state. The USSR fell apart without any war at all.

    -----------------------------
    Oh how! God bless the great and powerful America, otherwise Ukraine will fall apart. laughing laughing
    The USSR collapsed in a man-made way, from the betrayal of the elite, which wanted to become new feudal lords.
  15. 0
    11 June 2018 11: 59
    Quote: voyaka uh
    In Russia, one or two boats a year goes on combat duty. Most
    constantly at the pier.

    ---------------------------------------
    He and from the pier can shoot and hit targets. The performance characteristics of missiles in this regard are conditionally not limited in range, allowing to reach the territory of the United States.
    1. -1
      11 June 2018 15: 58
      It's right. But at the pier they are vulnerable. On all google maps are highlighted.
  16. 0
    11 June 2018 12: 49
    "America is an example to the world and continues to serve as a great bastion of freedom and hope for hundreds of millions ordinary people who live under communist and Islamic tyranny and oppression "

    And what is so modest - why not three billion? wassat Almost one and a half billion under the "yoke" of the Communists (China + North Korea + Cuba + Venezuela) and as many Muslims! But is America a great bastion of hope for all Muslims, Chinese, and North Koreans - no question, can they not understand what is obvious to all Americans? laughing
  17. -1
    11 June 2018 13: 44
    Here is a picture illustrating the state (quantity)
    fleets with nuclear submarines with ICBMs
    1. +1
      11 June 2018 14: 28
      Russia to build two more Boreas A - and there will be parity in marine Ya.
      1. 0
        11 June 2018 14: 51
        Boreas are good submarines.
        But they will only remain in service in the coming years.
        The rest will be written off as old age.
        (Recently at VO there was a detailed discussion. Information from there).
        In reality, Russia is now able to contain approximately
        6 nuclear submarines with ICBMs. So plan on your top.
        1. +2
          11 June 2018 16: 53
          Quote: voyaka uh
          6 nuclear submarines with ICBMs. So plan on your top.

          The eighth Borey is already under construction, plus 6 more planned. Warrior, go about your business, obviously not your topic laughing
          And horror, our Dolphins with Sineva and Liner, of which 6 pieces (one, the seventh Dolphin was converted to Poseidon, as well as the Squid itself), are quite the same age as Ohio with an average of thirty years. Launching the oldest Ohio in a year will be as much as 40 years wassat The oldest Dolphin will be 5 years younger. laughing Take care of the Merkavas there, the Daud’s sling, etc. Israel will have an atomic boat with ICBMs, then come and talk. Although I am not ready to bet on the existence of Israel in Palestine for more than five years. wassat
        2. 0
          11 June 2018 21: 51
          Quote: voyaka uh
          The rest will be written off as old age.

          Well, of course, the entire fleet of Russia will be written off soon, but the western ships - they are eternal.
          1. -1
            11 June 2018 22: 49
            Almost all surface ships of the first rank, yes, they will write off. And new ones are not built.
            But you can order, of course, from Koreans or Chinese. It will be reasonable.
            The submarines will remain.
            1. 0
              12 June 2018 00: 38
              Quote: voyaka uh
              The submarines will remain.

              The nuclear submarine is the basis of the modern fleet, if you do not have submarines, consider that you do not have a military fleet.
  18. 0
    11 June 2018 15: 13
    - I have 1800 missiles with nuclear warheads, 283 warships, 9400 aircraft ... I spend more on my army than the next 12 nations combined. And despite the fact that every year I spend more, I still do not feel safe!

    - This is elementary! You have a military-industrial complex.

    1. 0
      11 June 2018 23: 46
      What does it have to do with it? The resource of the boats is also limited. The old ones are already old. But the thing is that someone wants to make money on it. They gave the journalist money and asked to write. This is not even a lie!
      1. 0
        12 June 2018 11: 14
        Tampa needs to feed his coplex, that's all. No one will attack America, even if they do not have a single submarine left.
  19. 0
    11 June 2018 16: 50
    Let them come up with something to curb their volcano. He will soon start smoking, coughing and spitting.
  20. 0
    11 June 2018 21: 45
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Boreas are good submarines.
    But they will only remain in service in the coming years.
    The rest will be written off as old age.
    (Recently at VO there was a detailed discussion. Information from there).
    In reality, Russia is now able to contain approximately
    6 nuclear submarines with ICBMs. So plan on your top.


    Well, if you judge by the pictures the combat readiness of the Russian strategic nuclear forces, then it’s clear what you have in mind about the submarines. Oh well, the great experts in your idols also rely on you completely relying on their opinion.
  21. 0
    11 June 2018 23: 41
    It’s not clear what uncle wanted to say. Ah, I see! Give money for the modernization of Ohio. Lobbying someone's interests. Well, 154 Axes is not serious, but the Tridents are vice versa! Less need to drive them. No one in the US will attack. However, the interests of the military-industrial complex is a "dark forest."
  22. +1
    12 June 2018 00: 00
    Quote: BoA KAA
    It is correctly said: "Simplicity is worse than theft!"
    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    “Ohio” is not capable of volley more than two “Tridents”, and with an interval of a minute or more,
    Nuts shoot in series at 4 products in a salvo. Then a "technological" break and further according to plan. And since the release of all wearable BC is less than the PLO / PRO reaction time, they will fulfill their task. Unless, of course, the tracking of it by our submarine is established. But alas, while this is only possible in the Mediterranean ... And in the bay of St. Lawrence, the hollow is empty ...
    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    and they still have only one-headed “Minutemen” 40-year-olds. Who will guarantee that everything in Amer’s warheads does not burn out?
    Read about a series of upgrades of carriers and guidance systems, fuel, etc., to understand that the "old horse" will not spoil the furrow ... Otherwise, it would have been sent to the amphibian for a long time.
    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    leaving fuses 5-kiloton, type upgraded.
    These 5-Kt, as you put it, “fuses” set fire to a thermonuclear charge (lithium deuterite, for example). So, they could leave him only to increase the D launch, although it already provides a solution to the problems. Or, for the installation of point guidance systems, not at the expense of range. Fools are not kept in this department! This is not propaganda and agitation with Ms. Psaki! This is the SAC command!
    Why am I all this? And the fact that underestimating the enemy is the worst of the crimes of a military analyst, leader.
    Hooray hatchery - leave for Murzilka magazine! (of course, if it is still in production) Yes

    Understand: what I am writing is not hatred, but dry data, you can’t argue against them. The mattresses NEVER fired four or even three in a salvo. Never from the word "never," are not capable of the expression "are not capable." And not just in a salvo, the Ohio, after a simple double launch, needs to go to the dock, a structural single-hull feature. There were an insignificant number of doubles (with an interval of not less than a minute) by the way, and we easily made 4 “Clubs” with an interval of 5 (!) Seconds and the 16th in 2,5 minutes. Striped ears were allowed only one thing at a time, and even after one training the Ohio was immediately driven to overhaul - this is a known fact, and after trying to let the third one run the risk of falling to the bottom due to the collapse of the boat hull. See reports of damage to them, the body cracks at the seams after each start-up, out of 14, half are constantly under repair. They are even older than our “Dolphins”, and leave only a five-kiloton fuse (I completely suppose a non-working one) only because of the lack of filling due to the impotence of the American nuclear weapons complex: https://topwar.ru/142762-yadernoe-obrezanie.html
    Therefore, it’s not in vain that I say that in the 45-year-old heads of “Minutemans” and the 30-year-olds, the Tridents have little left to live, and their modernization has nothing to do with it. Do not argue on the nuclear issue, although I have not been a nuclear physicist for a long time I have been working with Rosenergoatom structures, I have been familiar with both Sahakyan and Arkadov, and I will read more about the possibilities of the American nuclear industry (as well as Westinghouse in particular) in any open reports. I’m not talking about Minuteman at all, from 2011 to 2017, reliability was approaching 50/50, that is, it would either take off or not take off))), and the case when 17 US Air Force officers were removed a couple of years ago for not knowing which buttons to press in order to prepare the rocket for launch - this will enter the repertoire of the best circuses in the world. And this is on combat duty.
    PS Understand the main thing: bluffing due to weakness is a traditional English and subsequently American occupation, and the argument "no fools are kept in the same place" is just the thing that the striped-eared want us to think. Russia is indeed capable of wiping the United States off the face of the earth without critical damage to itself.
  23. 0
    12 June 2018 00: 14
    Quote: voyaka uh
    "out of 14, six are in chronic repair, so only 8 come out, that is, two fours change." ///

    You did not realize, as usual, that this is the highest fighting efficiency, above which there is no world.
    Repairs are not called chronic, but regular periodic.
    6 on repair and maintenance, 8 on alert, 4 of them at sea, 4 at the pier.
    In Russia, one or two boats a year goes on combat duty. Most
    constantly at the pier.

    Once again, for a non-understanding Jewish visitor: the specific 6 Ohio nuclear-powered submarines never go on duty NEVER, is that understandable fellow warrior? And the fours I wrote to the maximum, in reality it goes by itself less (which, in addition, can only shoot 2 racket), although even if I wrote it. And in Russia, taking into account the three newest 955s, the combat readiness is at least no less, but at the same time, we have FIVE times the most powerful Strategic Missile Forces. Therefore, everything is right with me.
  24. 0
    12 June 2018 00: 49
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Your information is for 2012. 6 years ago. Then the budget for
    the fleet was much larger.
    -----
    "And we have a mine heavyweight - Voivode" /////
    -----
    It was. Missiles are in mines without nuclear warheads.

    Warrior, the general request is for you - post your MRI results, suddenly everything is not so hopeless. Dolphins are in good shape, better than Ohio, Columbia will appear no earlier than 2030 (by this t the Russian Federation may well destroy the United States), and on each of the 46 Governors not only cost 10 × 750 ct, but also updated , yes you yourself know, do not pretend. By the way, only one RS-20 is enough to incinerate your microscopic piece of earth to Martian soil, remember this every God's day.
  25. +1
    12 June 2018 00: 53
    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    More importantly, the Ohio is not capable of volley more than two Tridents, and with an interval of a minute or more, a single-hull design feature (but we can all 16).

    Yeah. So at one time, a salvo of four "tridents" made a kind of virtual American submarine. A salvo of 16 missiles was only once. Moreover, the “combat” missiles from these 16 were only 2. the remaining 14 are imitators. And it is not known what accuracy would be with such a salvo. For the preparation and launch process, and the preparation also includes aiming, is a rather serious process. And there is no guarantee that these 14 simulators, if they were actually missiles somewhere, would be missing. The only thing that this operation "Hippopotamus-2" showed is that the boat is capable of releasing 16 items at such a pace and not fall apart ...
    Moreover, there is no guarantee that the Borey will also be able to release their entire ammunition in one gulp.

    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    I think that not one thought is born of me: how can they deliver 100 RS-28 and the remaining 5 Boreevs - to fuck this evil spirits and finally rid the Earth of the greatest evil - the USA?

    Well, if you are planning to deploy as many as 100 RS-28s, with a total of 46 mines at present, you have a flag in your hands and a drum on your neck. Even the Union didn’t deploy as many Voivods. And the thought comes to you is quite bad. The SPRN system for them works no worse than ours. Of the entire triad, missiles in 12 boats can be fired, including and from the pier. And all 400 Minutemans. Therefore, not only are we able to rid the world of this dishonesty, but they are also able to rid the world of these "evil Russians." It should have been remembered that there will be no winners in a nuclear war, only losers ...

    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    Yes, with the strategists, too, everything is not going smoothly yet, but we have the most powerful Strategic Missile Forces, and they still have only one-headed Minutemans, 40-year-olds. Who will guarantee that everything in Amer’s warheads does not burn out?

    Do we have Poplars and Poplars-M - many-headed? And missiles with an age of 33-36 years do not think so new ?? And why did something burn out in their warheads, but in ours all tip-top? Both they and we conduct regular routine maintenance of their warheads. and they, and we carry out programs to extend the life of such charges ....

    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    And there is nothing to replace, therefore they pretend to be dressed, covering the ass with mug and leaving 5-kiloton fuses, such as upgraded.

    Apparently you do not even suspect about the American LEP program. but as yet an unresolved version of changing the power of a number (row, not all) of warheads from 100 to 5 kt, you already consider it a settled matter .... I must disappoint you. They have not yet begun these works and are only planning for the beginning of the next decade ... Maybe ....

    Quote: TermNachTER
    And how many little gods will they “bring to mind”?

    Your sarcasm, Nikolai, would be appropriate if you hadn’t brought it to your mind for years. How many years had Dolgoruky been brought, And how many Severodvinsk? How many years have they built Kazan?

    Quote: hrych
    They told you that now 46 Voivode with ten battle units of one megaton are definitely on duty

    Trim the sturgeon by about half ... Take the exchange data for 2017 from July to October and calculate how much was taken from the Voevod database ....

    Quote: TermNachTER
    But the “Ohio”, which returned from combat patrol and unloaded the “tridents” into the arsenal, can no longer be taken into account - it will not be in time.

    Nikolay! Do you think that our boats, returning from a military campaign, do not unload ammunition in the arsenal? Or do you think that regulations with the heads are held in the boat mine?
  26. 0
    12 June 2018 00: 53
    Quote: Andriy Πrivals
    One Ohio submarine is enough to destroy 90% of Russia's potential. Even one nuclear in the capital can lead to the collapse of the state. The USSR fell apart without any war at all.

    Citizen of the Pig-Bez-Salou, maybe you should stop using the window cleaner? It affects your brain badly, judging by the "conclusions".
    PS I think, as soon as everything settles down in Ukryatnik, psychiatrists' teams will plow there 24/7 laughing
  27. 0
    12 June 2018 01: 22
    Yes, that's right, the US needs to think about security. She annoyed too many. Now the United States will have to think about security all the time and for free it will not work.
  28. 0
    12 June 2018 08: 23
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    More importantly, the Ohio is not capable of volley more than two Tridents, and with an interval of a minute or more, a single-hull design feature (but we can all 16).

    Yeah. So at one time, a salvo of four "tridents" made a kind of virtual American submarine. A salvo of 16 missiles was only once. Moreover, the “combat” missiles from these 16 were only 2. the remaining 14 are imitators. And it is not known what accuracy would be with such a salvo. For the preparation and launch process, and the preparation also includes aiming, is a rather serious process. And there is no guarantee that these 14 simulators, if they were actually missiles somewhere, would be missing. The only thing that this operation "Hippopotamus-2" showed is that the boat is capable of releasing 16 items at such a pace and not fall apart ...
    Moreover, there is no guarantee that the Borey will also be able to release their entire ammunition in one gulp.

    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    I think that not one thought is born of me: how can they deliver 100 RS-28 and the remaining 5 Boreevs - to fuck this evil spirits and finally rid the Earth of the greatest evil - the USA?

    Well, if you are planning to deploy as many as 100 RS-28s, with a total of 46 mines at present, you have a flag in your hands and a drum on your neck. Even the Union didn’t deploy as many Voivods. And the thought comes to you is quite bad. The SPRN system for them works no worse than ours. Of the entire triad, missiles in 12 boats can be fired, including and from the pier. And all 400 Minutemans. Therefore, not only are we able to rid the world of this dishonesty, but they are also able to rid the world of these "evil Russians." It should have been remembered that there will be no winners in a nuclear war, only losers ...

    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    Yes, with the strategists, too, everything is not going smoothly yet, but we have the most powerful Strategic Missile Forces, and they still have only one-headed Minutemans, 40-year-olds. Who will guarantee that everything in Amer’s warheads does not burn out?

    Do we have Poplars and Poplars-M - many-headed? And missiles with an age of 33-36 years do not think so new ?? And why did something burn out in their warheads, but in ours all tip-top? Both they and we conduct regular routine maintenance of their warheads. and they, and we carry out programs to extend the life of such charges ....

    Quote: Sarmat Sanych
    And there is nothing to replace, therefore they pretend to be dressed, covering the ass with mug and leaving 5-kiloton fuses, such as upgraded.

    Apparently you do not even suspect about the American LEP program. but as yet an unresolved version of changing the power of a number (row, not all) of warheads from 100 to 5 kt, you already consider it a settled matter .... I must disappoint you. They have not yet begun these works and are only planning for the beginning of the next decade ...

    If you already say that during Hippo-2 14 out of 16 were mass-dimensional, then why don’t you mention that mattresses are ALWAYS mass-sized. The fact that amers with an imitation of reality during educational launches is much worse than ours is a fact already known.
    Plus, the interval of launches: with us they are fantastically small and with striatum shamefully huge. The last time in 2017 (this was after an unsuccessful launch by the British) they barely exhausted a double launch, and then with an interval of 3 (!) Hours. Probably after the first water was pumped out of the mine))). At the same time, take an interest in whether they made at least 20% of their training starts such distances as ours from the North to Kura. And how many percent are there “successful” but with subsequent planned self-liquidation. And so yes, "Trident")).
    Speak about 33-36? Let's add and calculate the average age of the potentials of the Russian Federation and USA - it turns out that we are younger than TIME IN THREE. As for the missing mines, at the current level of construction equipment and technologies it’s much cheaper to build additional ones than then, as I am telling you as a person connected with nuclear construction, there’s tens of times more concrete is poured and it’s easy to do. And finally, you don’t need to drag this LEP program everywhere, this is not the first time I've seen you. Firstly, the matter concerns NEW plutonium, but the mattresses stupidly do not have it and it will not appear in any modernization-rejuvenation, and even more so in the quantities that they need, but here it is all updated and will be updated further. And secondly, to remind you with what cut and scandal the last modernization of the Minutemans went through? Yes, you apparently do not know much, so read it. Not to mention their reliability in the exercises from 2011 to 2017.
  29. 0
    12 June 2018 20: 47
    they will answer ... only then where to moor, in Antarctica ... There will be less infection then ...
  30. 0
    13 June 2018 01: 10
    American expert: submarines "Ohio" will respond to America's nuclear destruction
    The ice has broken. American expert speaks about nuclear destruction of America - the point does not seem to be iron laughing
  31. 0
    13 June 2018 18: 14
    And why answer is not the destruction of America belay -Died so died. laughing
  32. 0
    17 June 2018 23: 03
    Yeah, fresh tradition. Like they were on the moon with the help of Kubrick, they remained idiots. Where do they get their cogs after the defeat of the American continent. They will ask for us in Russia.
  33. 0
    27 June 2018 13: 54
    Quote: Pollux
    Quote: DVTamga
    Ukrainians - such a nationality does not exist.

    So what? The Russians also do not have such a nationality. This is citizenship.
    Quote: DVTamga
    Initially, it was generally either a type of party, or a bunch of homosexuals with a Polish bias, calling themselves Ukrainians.

    What are fascist ideas? Do you know that there are nine (u) krajins in Russia?
    Altay
    Kamchatka
    Khabarovsk Krai
    Krasnodar
    Krasnoyarsk Territory
    Perm
    Primorsky Krai
    Stavropol region
    Trans-Baikal Territory
    And all the inhabitants of these regions are Ukrainians.



    What you wrote, excuse me, stupidity. You yourself wrote the land. Not the outskirts. It seems, but not that.