Belarusian attack

40
May 16 turned 215 years of seniority 7 of the Hussar Belarusian Emperor Alexander I regiment.

The seniority was established 16 May 1803, when in he. Yekaterinopol and Zvenigorodka, the regiment chief-in-chief, Major General Count P. V. Golenishchev-Kutuzov, formed the Belarusian Hussars' Regiment - from hussar regiments of Olviopolsky, Yelisavetgrad, Pavlograd and Alexandria, which separated two squadrons.



In 1805, the Byelorussian regiment distinguished itself in Moldavia - in the Russian-Turkish theater of operations, conducting dashing affairs near Bucharest, Turbat, Zhurzhey, and Izmail. October 10 1809 in the battle of the Tartar regiment attacked the superior forces of the Turks, overturned the enemy and took two flags. Led by the new chief, Major General Ya. P. Kulnev, the 5 regiment of May 1810 crossed the Danube and took an active part in the battle of Shumla, in the capture of Nikopol and Rushchuk. September 17 The Belarusian hussars who acted as part of the Danube army distinguished themselves in the battle of Luboml. In the 1812 campaign, the regiment participated in the battles of Lützen, Bautzen and Leipzig. Especially the regiment distinguished itself under Katsbach - where a dashing attack together with the Akhtyr hussars under the personal command of their chief, Major General S. N. Lansky, overturned the French cavalry and crushed the infantry of the enemy’s left flank - for which he was awarded the signs on the caps with the inscription: 1813 August 14 of the Year. " In 1813, the regiment distinguished itself in the battle of Fere-Champenoise. For participation in 1814-1812 campaigns. 1814 silver pipes were presented to the regiment with the inscription: “To the Belarusian Hussars, which is now the Prince of Orange, for excellent courage and bravery in the memorable 22 campaign of the year rendered.” We are talking about the regimental chef from 1814 in March 5, Prince of Orange (the future king of the Netherlands Willem II).

In the campaign 1828 - 29. The regiment distinguished itself under Silistra and Shumla. In the battle at Kulch 30 in May 1829, the Belarusian hussars as part of the 1 brigade of the 2 hussar division supported the infantry with their courageous attacks and made it possible for the horse artillery, which had jumped to the aid, to turn the Turks to flight. For this brilliant business and for the differences in this Russian-Turkish war, the regiment received 22 St. George pipes with inscriptions: "For the difference in the Turkish war 1829 of the year."

In 1831, the regiment was part of the troops subduing the Polish uprising, and in 1849, the Belarusian hussars took part in military actions against the Hungarians - distinguished themselves in the battle near Debrechin. In memory of this difference, after the death of the King of the Netherlands, Austrian Field Marshal Count Y. Radetsky was appointed the regiment's chief, and in the rescript of his name, the Emperor Nicholas I called the Byelorussian regiment “the bravest in my cavalry”. The regiment became known as the Hussar Field Marshal gr. Radetzky, and 19 March 1854, the name “Belarusian” was added to this name.

In the Crimean War 1853-56. the regiment was moved to the Danube and participated in the battle of Tohhaverdo-Kagarlyk (19 June 1854 g.). 1 January 1858 Mr. Mikhail Nikolaevich was appointed chief of the regiment, and March 25 the 1864 regiment received the number 7.

In the Russian-Turkish war 1877-78's. The regiment particularly distinguished itself in the battles of Hadji Oglu Bazardzhik (14 of September 1877 and 10 of January 1878) and in the battle of Varna-Pravody (14 of January of 1878). For this campaign, the regiment was awarded the St. George standard with the inscription: “For the difference in the Turkish war of 1877-78”, to which in 1903 (on the day of the 100 anniversary anniversary of the regiment) was added the inscription “1803-1903” and awarded the Alexander Jubilee tape. The same inscription: "1803-1903" added to the St. George's ribbons.

18 August 1882 regiment was renamed 21 th dragoon, and 6 December 1907 regiment was returned name: 7 th Hussars Belorussian E. I.V. Vel. Prince Mikhail Nikolaevich regiment. After the death of the Augusteys Chef, 1909, the regiment began to be called the 7 Hussars of Belarus. Finally, on the milestone day of the 100th anniversary of the Patriotic War, the Highest Order of 26 in August 1912 “in return for excellent courage and bravery in the battles of World War II”, the regiment was ordered to be called the 7 of Belarus Hussar by Alexander I regiment.


Private 7 hussar regiment in full uniform. Postcard P. V. Robike.

Such is in short the glorious story Belarusian hussars. And a new page of their glory opened the Second World War - the Great War 1914 - 1917.

2 August 1914 Belarusian hussars commanded by Colonel P.I. Sukovkin attacked the Hungarian cavalry under Stoyanov. And 15 August 1914 in the fields of Volyn, Vasilkov 3 th squadron of the regiment attacked the Austrian battery and infantry in the equestrian formation - chopping more of the enemy battalion. For this case, the wounded commander of the squadron Captain A. A. Vyazmitinov personally the Emperor was awarded the Order of St. George 4 degree, and the entire combat personnel of the squadron received the St. George 4 degree.

3 June 1916 the following significant case of the Belarusian hussars happened - and we would like to tell about it in more detail.

The offensive of the South-Western Front was under way, and the 7-I cavalry division under the command of Lieutenant-General F. S. Rerberg went behind the advancing infantry with reinforced gaits — moving from the right flank to the left.

Belarusian attack
F. S. Rerberg.

By 15-16 hours, passing between Myshlini and Novoselki from the colony Olgin, Belarusian hussars and Cossacks of the 11 Don Cossack Regiment went into the valley south-east of der. Zvinyache.

The advance of the infantry stopped, and the troops stretched out. At this time, the enemy, pulling up a fresh Hungarian division, twisted the left flank of the Russians south of vil. By two infantry regiments. Thoughts - with the intention to take advantage of the natural gap between the parts. Over the hills of rough terrain in the direction of the village of Myslina - stake Kupovets went heavy infantry battle - and the left flank of the Russian infantry, more and more increased the gap with its neighbors.

F. S. Rerberg issued an order: “Belarusian hussars in the equestrian ranks attack the enemy’s advancing infantry and straighten out the situation. Confident in success. 11-th Don regiment to be in combat reserve. "

The commander of the Byelorussians, Colonel N. P. Serebrennikov, leaving with him the standard and a platoon of the 1 squadron, drove off over the hill, ordering Colonel G. Zubov, the senior head officer of the regiment, to lead the regiment to the attack. Snatching a sword from the scabbard, G. N. Zubov held out in front of the regiment.

Having built a full front "half-squadron on infantry", the Belarusians rushed forward - and after the next knoll they came into the attacking dense chains of the Hungarians, crushed them and, after hurricane passing three lines of chains, began to turn back - the trumpeters were already jumping from the head of the division, trumpeting .



1-th, 2-th and part of 4-th squadron turned right-back, collecting prisoners.

Lieutenant I. I. Zamkovsky, collecting the remnants of the left-flank 3 squadron, which suffered relatively large losses from machine-gun fire, and part of the hussars of the neighboring 4 squadron, turned left and back and led the hussars to the enemy guns still firing from Elizarov. Here the squadron’s losses were high, the lieutenant I. I. Znajkovsky was wounded, but the machine guns were silenced — their calculations and cover were chopped up and thickened. This enabled the entire regiment to avoid further losses and collect prisoners.

The battlefield was left for the Byelorussians, and the Hungarian infantry (or rather its remnants) fled to the north. At first they steadfastly resisted, but could not withstand the rapid attack. Part of the Hungarian infantry, which was pressing against the left flank of the Russian infantry, began to retreat.

Thus, the breakthrough and detour from the fresh infantry formation of the enemy were eliminated by the 500 Russian hussars who took more 2500 prisoners. In addition, the Hungarian infantry lost 1600 people killed and wounded.

The summary of the Supreme Commander's Headquarters was noted: “Belarusian hussars dashing horse attack attacked the enemy’s infantry and destroyed the 1 and 11 regiments of the Hungarian Honed, eliminating the breakthrough and capturing a significant number of prisoners.”

After the battle, the 3 th squadron of the Byelorussians was reduced to one and a half platoons (and half a squadron was urgently requested) - but it was his second attack on the machine guns that made it possible to change the course of the fight. The officers were awarded orders and orders, and the lower ranks received St. George's crosses.

What is unique about this fight?

First, we see a cavalry attack not against a battered or retreating enemy, but against deployed and advancing infantry performing a serious maneuver. The Hungarian infantry is qualitatively equivalent to the best German units. And this infantry was not only defeated by cavalrymen - it suffered the hardest losses, many times more than the number of hussars.

Secondly, the cavalry dealt a blow to the enemy’s machine guns against it - and, despite the losses, it emerged victorious from this fight.

Thirdly, the hussars decided the fate of an important battle - having parried a promising maneuver from the side of a fresh mix of the enemy. The terrain (bumps) in this case favored the actions of cavalrymen - hiding them from the eyes of the enemy and allowing them to reach tactical surprise.

The 7 th hussar Belarusian regiment later took part in the 1917 Summer Offensive of the Year, and then, as part of the 7 Cavalry Division and Consolidated Corps, covered the retreat of the Russian units.

Courage, audacity in battle and tactical literacy - this is what the hussars of the 7 Belarusian Regiment, one of the many army regiments of the Russian cavalry, demonstrated during the Great War - inscribing new laurels in the history of their native unit.


"Three Musketeers". Hussars of the 7 regiment in light blue dolmans pose with bare bombs.


Col. E. K. Miller, Commander of the 7 Hussars in December 1907 - August 1909. During the Great War, Lieutenant-General Miller — P. A. Plehve, a cavalry general's comrade-in-arms and one of the most talented staff officers of the Russian Army, the chief of staff of the 5 and 12 armies. During the Civil War - the Chief of the Northern Territory. In emigration, the chairman of the Association of Officers of the 7 Hussar Regiment, and since January 27 1930 (after the abduction of A. I. Kutepov) accepted the duties of the EMRO Chairman. In September, 1937 was kidnapped by Soviet agents, and in 1939, he died in Moscow.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    21 May 2018 05: 23
    Well done Belarusians!
    Dashing attack, how significant the entire battle history of the regiment is significant
    1. +12
      21 May 2018 06: 18
      Quote: The Headless Horseman
      Dashing attack, how significant the entire battle history of the regiment is significant

      Right now, units will be created on the Terminators, why not return one of the individual battalions to this glorious name and Battle Banner? I think it would not be bad, like saving MEMORY
      1. +20
        21 May 2018 06: 39
        You are right, great thought.
        By the way, the British and now the cavalry regiment (in my regiment of the palace cavalry it is even called, and is included in the armored corps) did not climb out of Afghanistan and Iraq, riding on the Spartans and Skimitars
      2. +9
        21 May 2018 08: 25
        Great idea. It is only a pity that in the modern Russian Federation, as in the USSR, they neglect the history of the Imperial Army and do not want to recall its regiments covered with the glory of truly heroic victories.
        1. +3
          21 May 2018 08: 26
          Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
          It is only a pity that in the modern Russian Federation, as in the USSR, they neglect the history of the Imperial Army and do not want to recall its regiments covered with the glory of truly heroic victories.

          You shouldn’t be so. Two FIRST regiments have already been restored. I am Preobrazhentsi and Semenovtsi.
          1. +5
            21 May 2018 09: 29
            We are talking about the regiments of the Petrovsky Guard. And the restoration was expressed in the assignment of a name, nothing more. After all, no one gave the banner of the Transfiguration to the 154th Commandant Regiment.
        2. +2
          21 May 2018 08: 33
          What kind of stupidity was frozen ..... only you, what do you “remember” there, with a dubious bias in the dense anti-Soviet, sometimes completely coinciding with the Russian community?
          1. +7
            21 May 2018 09: 27
            Mr. Baden, good day to you! If I were you, I would be embarrassed to talk about Russophobia, because your words regarding the memory of the Russian Imperial Army are the same Russophobia. Only a person who hates Russia and the Russian people will speak so disparagingly of the Russian regiments covered in historical glory.
            1. +1
              21 May 2018 12: 17
              Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
              Only a person who hates Russia and the Russian people will speak so disparagingly of the Russian regiments covered in historical glory.

              Therefore, you are so fiercely and meanly pouring dirt onto Soviet shelves, but weren’t the Russians fighting there?
              So what else oppresses you?
              The wrong people and the wrong people?
              Would you counts and princes, but the people of Krasnodar and Vlasovites, to personify something there?
              And finally, where, you boor, claiming that I hate Russian military history, I fall into Russophobia, show at least one comment confirming your boorish attack? Can you?
          2. +5
            21 May 2018 09: 39
            Quote: badens1111
            of something there, “remember”, with a dubious bias in dense anti-Soviet

            WHAT? But nothing that we have now the whole country is ANTI-SOVIET?
            Quote: badens1111
            , at times completely coinciding with the Russophobia?

            How can the revival of the Glory History of RUSSIAN WEAPON coincide with Russophobia? Explain
            1. +1
              21 May 2018 12: 14
              Quote: svp67
              what about? But nothing that we have now the whole country is ANTI-SOVIET?

              Thank you for your recognition, are you happy?
              Continue hallelujah to exalt with curls and other nabiulinic along with others, you will be happy.
              Quote: svp67
              How can the revival of the Glory History of RUSSIAN WEAPON coincide with Russophobia? Explain

              What can I explain to you? Look at the new Victory PARADE on May 9, hear at least once a phrase about the Supreme and the feat of the Soviet soldier and the Soviet people.
              I’m not talking about colored banners, which for some reason they called “battle banners”, behind which there is nothing, the void is colorful, a glitch in a simple way.
              So it is not necessary to tell the tales of the Renaissance with the complete and total vilification of the Soviet period.
              1. +5
                21 May 2018 18: 14
                Quote: badens1111
                So it is not necessary to tell the tales of the Renaissance with the complete and total vilification of the Soviet period.

                The Soviet period is less than a century. And before him there were more than two centuries of imperial, it turns out that we should delete them? Does it make sense to combine? Yet this is our story.
                1. +1
                  21 May 2018 18: 48
                  Quote: svp67
                  The Soviet period is less than a century. And before him there were more than two centuries of imperial, it turns out that we should delete them?

                  Who and when has you been overwhelmed by this idea that it is necessary to throw out any period from History ?? This is the same false mangy, who is found in lieutenants ...
                  Combine .. well, combine so, without dishonoring either one or the other, otherwise you’ll chat everything and everyone, in pursuit of the ghosts of the past and the sighs of admirers of the crunch of rolls ..
                  Quote: svp67
                  The Soviet period is less than a century.

                  YES .. LESS THAN A CENTURY, but so much has been done that it costs a couple of centuries, is it really not clear?
                  And to dishonor this period of their History, to lie for that period, to blacken their grandfathers, an occupation for absolute Russophobes.
                  I hope I clearly expressed the idea of ​​the continuity of the history of the country, with any period of its existence in various political and economic forms?
                  1. +5
                    21 May 2018 20: 09
                    Quote: badens1111
                    YES .. LESS THAN A CENTURY, but so much has been done that it costs a couple of centuries, is it really not clear?

                    No, not clear.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    in pursuit of the ghosts of the past and the sighing sighs of lovers of crunch buns ..
                    You clearly give out your thoughts for what is being said. And here is BUN. Our forefathers Fought for centuries carrying out feats not in the name of BUNK, but in the name of the Fatherland. A century ago, we erased their names from memory. This is not fair.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    And to dishonor this period of their History, to lie for that period, to blacken their grandfathers, an occupation for absolute Russophobes.

                    Do you yourself have some kind of phobia in your head, someone here called for blackening? Drink a sedative.
                    Quote: badens1111
                    I hope I clearly expressed the idea of ​​the continuity of the history of the country, with any period of its existence in various political and economic forms?

                    No. Your statements are clearly skewed
                    1. +1
                      21 May 2018 22: 12
                      Quote: svp67
                      A century ago, we erased their names from memory

                      If you crossed out, you should keep the answer, I won’t mention anything that you would strike out, see films more often, starting with Aleksandr Nevsky, Cherkasov and other films, for example, “Ships storm bastions!”, Look at the year of release, to remind myself ..
                      At school, it was necessary to study history well, so that from school to know that military history has never been diminished.
                      Quote: svp67
                      phobia in the head

                      Are you in the lawyers of the "lieutenants"? Hush, calm your nerves ..

                      Quote: svp67
                      Your statements are clearly skewed

                      Take care of yourself, there is no bias in my words. The devil’s lawyer is working in vain.
                      1. +3
                        22 May 2018 03: 19
                        Quote: badens1111
                        If you crossed out, you

                        Personally, I have NOT DELETED. I’m vice versa for returning many names from nonexistence
                        Quote: badens1111
                        I won’t mention something that would be scratched out,

                        But you support this by refusing THEIR RETURN
                        Quote: badens1111
                        see films more often, starting with Aleksandr Nevsky, with Cherkasov and other films, for example, “Ships storm bastions!”, but look at the release year, to remind yourself ..

                        Thank. This is VERY GOOD MOVIES and I was brought up on them too, but do you think that is all? No one else to return? They returned Suvorov, but why not return his most beloved and militant 11th Grenadier Fanagoria regiment, the regiment’s march was returned, moreover, in the 30s, but the regiment wasn’t. Well then, it’s understandable, ideology didn’t allow it, but now what is in the way?
                        Quote: badens1111
                        At school, it was necessary to study history well, so that from school to know that military history has never been diminished.

                        Oh, you look like a school course and stopped ... That's the reason for your phobia, you still read the SOVIET school textbooks. Unfortunately, but they are one-sided. Entire layers of our history are crossed out in them.
                        Quote: badens1111
                        Are you in the lawyers of the "lieutenants"?

                        And not only lieutenants, but also vahmistra, coronets, staff majors and many others, about whom it was ordered to FORGET in 1917
                        Quote: badens1111
                        Hush, calm your nerves ..

                        I am calm as a boa constrictor. You can’t bear your sores on others.
                        Quote: badens1111
                        Take care of yourself, there is no bias in my words.

                        Calm down, calm down ... Have you taken a sedative?
                        Quote: badens1111
                        Devil's lawyer is working in vain.

                        Oh, yes you and Hollywood are watching .... Unlike you, I do not refer to the devils the people who made my Fatherland GREAT, often giving my life for it.
            2. +1
              22 May 2018 09: 00
              Quote: svp67
              How can the revival of the Glory History of RUSSIAN WEAPON coincide with Russophobia?

              For those who are especially dull, I’m forced to give a detailed answer, take the trouble to follow the link, maybe you will understand what it is about.
              https://cont.ws/@douglas/950328
              Well, look in Perm, where it was PROHIBITED to carry the Victory Banner on the march of the Immortal Regiment.
              http://xn----ctbkkcxcibmmhn.ru-an.info/%D0%BD%D0%
              BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8/%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%
              B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%B2-%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1
              %80%D0%BC%D0%B8-%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%83%D0
              %B3-%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0-%D
              0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8-%D0%BF%D
              0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%8B-%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B2%D
              0%B5%D0%BB-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%
              D1%83%D1%8E-%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%83-%D0%BA%D1%80
              %D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BE
              %D1%84%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BA%D1%83/
    2. +1
      21 May 2018 09: 02
      in 1795 the partition of the Commonwealth took place i.e. the union of Poland and Lithuania. In Poland, the population was called Poles / Poles, and in Lithuania they were called Litvinians. Lithuania was exactly the future Belarus, but what would the 1803 Hussar regiment be called Belarusian! This somehow cuts the ear. Historically, Belaya Rus is Moscow and the Moscow region. But on what basis Lithuania was called -Belarus is not clear. These were Romanov’s experiments.
      1. +3
        21 May 2018 11: 17
        Quote: Bar1
        in 1795 the partition of the Commonwealth took place i.e. Union of Poland and Lithuania. In Poland the population was called Poles / Poles, and in Lithuania they were called Litvinians.

        Yeah, right now ... in 1569, as a result of the Lublin Union, the Commonwealth formed, and the territory of present-day Ukraine, thanks to another betrayal of the elite, from the ON ("Principality") fell into Poland ("Crown") - however, its population was not called Poles they were called "Rusyns", and the most dangerous enemy of Khmelnitsky - Yarema Vishnevetsikiy - was titled" Russian governor "! The term" Muscovy "took root in Europe precisely because Russia was considered to be the ON (which was often even called the" VK LithuanianRussian")
        Quote: Bar1
        But on what basis Lithuania was called -Belarus-it is not clear

        Historically, "White" (i.e., free) was called that part of Russia that did not become dependent on the Mongols. So the term itself (as applied to the territory of present Belarus) is very old!
        1. 0
          21 May 2018 12: 48
          Quote: Weyland
          Yeah, right now ... in 1569, as a result of the Lublin Union, the Commonwealth formed, and the territory of present-day Ukraine, thanks to another betrayal of the elite, from the ON ("Principality") fell into Poland ("Crown") - however, its population was not called Poles , they were called "Rusyns",


          and Che Khmelnitsky fought with the Rusyns, or what?

          Quote: Weyland
          composition of Poland ("Crowns")


          and what is Poland, is this the Crown in your opinion?
          Quote: Weyland
          Khmelnitsky's most dangerous enemy - Yarema Vishnevetsikiy - was titled "Russian governor"! T


          yes it is, but at the same time it was quite a Polish and Catholic voivode and fought with Khmelnitsky.
          Quote: Weyland
          Historically, "White" (i.e., free) was called that part of Russia that did not become dependent on the Mongols. So the term itself (as applied to the territory of present Belarus) is very old!


          what names were not in those places
          -Russia White
          -Russia Black
          - Palatinate Minsk
          Voivodeship Minsk
          -Lithuania
          -Porussia East
          -Prussia
          -Russian Voivodeship
          Here is a map of 1773, when there was still Poland-Lithuania, so these same RUSSIANs of all kinds in Poland and Lithuania and around there was a whole bunch

          Russia Red / Red, right up to Kiev


          Lithuania Russia on the present Lithuanian and Latvian lands


          Russian Voivodeship



          Porussia East and Prussia



          Black Russia, and here confusion is possible, as usual in the words -Black and Chervonny, so perhaps the territory of the present Belrusi was also called Rus Chervonnaya.



          http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53093527w/f
          1.item.zoom
          1. +1
            21 May 2018 21: 55
            Quote: Bar1
            at the same time it was quite a Polish and Catholic voivode

            yeah. The founder of the Zaporizhzhya Sich Dmitry Vishnevetsky ("Cossack Baida") - "Ukrainian prince", and his great-grandson Yarema (maternal - Moldavian, nephew of Metropolitan Pyotr Mohyla) - "cursed lyakh"! laughing He adopted Catholicism at the age of 19.
            And the expressions "Principality" and "Crown" were quite running - read at least Senkevich!
            By the way, Chervonnaya Russia is Lviv region, and Black is the north-west of Belarus
            1. 0
              21 May 2018 23: 58
              Quote: Weyland
              By the way, Chervonnaya Russia is Lviv region,

              I brought you a map - Russia Red / Chervonnaya on the map not only Lviv region, but the whole Ukraine is now and apparently part of Belarus.

              Black - north-west of Belarus


              didn’t look at the map?
              1. +1
                22 May 2018 11: 59
                Quote: Bar1
                didn’t look at the map?

                looked. I only doubt the reliability
                1. 0
                  22 May 2018 12: 15
                  Quote: Weyland
                  Quote: Bar1
                  didn’t look at the map?

                  looked. I only doubt the reliability

                  it’s not necessary to talk about 100% the truth of old documents, because there are almost no Russian cards preserved — they were destroyed. But to say that all cards are 100% falsified is also not correct, forgers wouldn’t have to think up anything, so some of the truth on the old ones There are European maps.
      2. +1
        22 May 2018 16: 21
        Everything is normal for hearing. Belarus was already called Belarus in the 17th century, at least long before 1803.
  2. +8
    21 May 2018 06: 16
    "Three Musketeers". Hussars of the 7 regiment in light blue dolmans pose with bare bombs.
    "The war is the work of the hands of young people" ... In the photo just GUYS, and already HEROES.
  3. +18
    21 May 2018 06: 31
    By the way, here is such an interesting fact about the seniority of the Belarusian Regiment, which could be even more ancient, approaching the oldest regiment of the Russian regular army - the 13th Life-Grenadier Erivan Regiment, which led seniority even from the era of Mikhail Fedorovich.
    When in 1833 the division of the Chernigov equestrian jaeger regiment, which was descended from the Chernihiv companions of the hetman Demian Mnogogreshny (1668), was attached to the Belorussian regiment, the Chernigov eldership was given to the Belorussian regiment. And in 1868 the regiment was commanded by the Highest to celebrate the 200th anniversary - moreover, he was granted the anniversary Alexander ribbon and the inscription on the standard: “1668-1868”.
    But on December 10, 1884, the seniority of the Belarusian Regiment from 1803 was ordered to be considered the Highest Decree, the tape from the standard was handed over to the Main Commandant’s Office and the inscription was canceled, and the silver pipes of the Chernigov Regiment were transferred to the Glukhovsky Regiment - subsequently the 6th Dragoon.
  4. 0
    21 May 2018 08: 14
    Is there litvinism here? Did the hussars know that they were Belarusian? And then the so-called. Belarusians themselves did not know this and called themselves simply "stout".
    1. +19
      21 May 2018 08: 29
      What kind of lithuania, what kind of nonsense?
      The historian should know that the names of the regiments of the regular troops did not in any way reflect the system of manning the regiments, and the territorial system for the core of the Russian army was absent.
      So the name Belarusian does not mean that the regiment was equipped with Belarusians, or Astrakhan with Astrakhan. The fact of the name reflected the history of the regiment and other circumstances, but not the acquisition of regular units.
      That is why the fighters of the Belarusian regiment were not called BELARUSIANS, but BELARUSIANS, the fighters of the Kiev regiment were not KIEVLIANS, but KIEVSY, and the Moscow regiment - not MOSCOW, but MOSCOW.
      1. +16
        21 May 2018 09: 07
        I will add from myself that peacetime soldiers brought up by a regimental family knew the history of their native regiment (up to the names of all regimental commanders) and the exploits of his ranks. And they were proud of belonging to the regiment, its form. Of course, some nationalist speculations connected with the name of the regiment were in those days incomprehensible and alien to the soldiers and officers of the pre-revolutionary Russian imperial army.
  5. +8
    21 May 2018 08: 23
    Wonderful article! To defeat two regiments of infantry in the middle of the Great War with an attack on horseback is, of course, a heroic cause. And after all, what is remarkable, it was the commanders of those years, staff captains and colonels who were supposed to face the Russian army by the 20s of the twentieth century.
    To the author — my deepest gratitude for the work done!
    1. +4
      21 May 2018 08: 36
      Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
      And after all, what is remarkable, it was the commanders of those years, staff captains and colonels who were supposed to face the Russian army by the 20s of the twentieth century.

      Oh, how ... and so they became, many. It’s true that because of your clearly anti-Russian, exactly so, anti-Soviet views, it’s hard to recall the names from Shaposhnikov to Skobelev., Slashchev and many more.
      You would all about red and skin with seeds to suffer ..
      1. +4
        21 May 2018 09: 28
        Quote: badens1111
        it is clearly hard to recall the names from Shaposhnikov to Skobelev., Slashchev and many more.


        Not many. And those who were deceived by the beautiful statements of the Bolsheviks paid for it by the end of the 20s with their lives. Case "Spring" remember?
        1. 0
          21 May 2018 15: 31
          Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
          Case "Spring" remember?

          We did not forget the concentration camp in Mudyug. The article does not completely recall the role of Mr. Miller in such a "great" case.
          Lieutenant General Miller is a combat associate of the cavalry general P. A. Pleve and one of the most talented staff officers of the Russian Army, chief of staff of the 5th and 12th armies. During the Civil War - Chief of the Northern Territory.
        2. 0
          21 May 2018 17: 38
          Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
          Case "Spring" remember?

          Remember, as someone who did this, then leaned against the wall, answering for crimes.
          At the same time, take the trouble to find a photo of the descendant of those who participated in those outrages, at Trotsky’s grave, you will be happy. In essence, they are yours, why are you making antics here?
          And they correctly pointed you-
          Quote: 97110 (nicholas
          We did not forget the concentration camp in Mudyug. The article does not completely recall the role of Mr. Miller in such a "great" case.

          Can remind you of the sadist Semyonov? Ungern? And recall how they ended their despicable lives, these executioners?
  6. -1
    21 May 2018 18: 02
    The hussars had no sabers, but there were sabers.
    1. +15
      22 May 2018 07: 05
      The hussars had no sabers, but there were sabers.

      You will be mistaken, confusing it with earlier times, as well as a complex of officer and soldier armaments. (See J. Gerard Gorokhov. Cavalry of the Russian Army).
      So:
      OFFICERS - drafts arr. 1881, checker arr. 1909, saber arr. 1909. was available for hussars, lancers and dragoons, which were not previously cuirassiers.
      ALL RIVER CAVALERY of the regular cavalry ::
      checker arr. 1881 with a bayonet on a scabbard, Dragoon rifle arr. 1881, and for those who are in the first line - the peak of the image of 1910
      That is, the hussar officers had sabers, and the rank and file - checkers
      1. +16
        22 May 2018 09: 04
        You are right The headless horseman, and if the enemy infantry took the blow of the Russian cavalry, then the cavalry as a rule passed. Here is a passage from the memorial of non-commissioned officer of the 7th Belarusian Hussars from 15:
        During the retreat of 1915, in Galicia, the 7th cavalry was delayed near the city of Przhevrosk. Our 2nd brigade, hussars and Cossacks, passed through the city. The Cossacks remained in reserve, and the Belorussians hurried us and we occupied the mounds along the front to the left of the highway leading to the north. The Austrian infantry was advancing to our left, trying to reach our rear. Their artillery beat lazily, and ours from the city rarely showed itself; we had almost no shells left by this time.
        My platoon, Maksimenko, had not yet returned after being wounded, and I remained behind the platoon of the 3rd platoon of the 1st squadron. Hurrying a platoon, put people in a chain, firing, commanding the sight, and suddenly I notice that some hussars click shutters, aim, pull the trigger. Eyes are open, they don’t put in new clips, but they blow for nothing, they sleep in reality. This is the degree to which fatigue can be reached.
        We lay there for two hours and the Austrians seemed to be delayed, at least their progress across the highway, in the area of ​​our shelling, stopped.
        Suddenly we were commanded: "On the horses", we ran to the forest, where there were horse guides. Team "sit down." We went out to the meadow to the right of the highway and the regiment was built with a wide front. The standard was transferred to the fourth squadron.
        We see - about two miles from us from the forest a cavalry jumps out in a platoon and also builds a front. Case in the evening, the sun is on them - everything is visible, as if in the palm of your hand. Black horses, red leggings, blue Hungarians, black hats. The second regiment jumped out and the third was shown — the division.
        We are a brigade, but we are Belorussians and the 11th Donskoy; the Austrian division cannot stand against us either.
        The old hussars began to take peaks from the young and rebuild in the 1st line. Young are glad: many are not used to the peak. At our platoons: on the first staff captain Volkov, on the fourth lieutenant Natsenzon. On the second is the cornet of Lviv and on our cornet is Nechaev. Small, stocky, large black mustache, nicknamed "Black Sea". Lieutenant Natenson also took a pike. The horses also realized that there would be an attack. They don’t stand, they spin their ears, the back row directly through the front row looks at the Austrians. I see - the young hussars in the back row are nervous. I think - it is necessary to say some non-commissioned officer instruction:
        —- Listen to the lads, - I say: - examine the girths, try a checker. Back when striking, strive to the left of its front line and do not chop, but if. Under your feet all the time; do not dismiss the horses; after, as if knocked down - immediately hold on, - wait for the second attack: Keep your distance, do not press and do not stretch, we go to the cavalry. Bobkin, loosen up, spin the threes!
        I myself tried cinchs, thought to insert a place for Nechaev to besiege in order. At this time, the command:
        - Alignment in the middle, regiment in a march!
        He took off his cap, crossed himself, and then he didn’t even think, or rather, felt: now, once, maybe a hundred years ago, the Belarusian regiment was built to attack. On the right flank of the 3rd platoon of the 1st squadron was also a non-commissioned officer unknown to me. And so he said the instruction to the hussars, and in the same way he tried girths, and he was also baptized, and prepared to give an answer to the Lord God. And it doesn’t matter if I’ll be gone - everything will be done, as it should according to the charter and by oath. Another non-commissioned officer will take my place; he will also calmly and confidently examine people and also without hesitation will fulfill his duty.
        In a moment of high nervous tension, - before the horse attack, preparing to give an answer to the Lord God, - I truly felt a continuity with my ancestors. This connection has not been interrupted since the time of our first Moscow troops, perhaps from the Battle of Kulikovo itself. Also came to the troops "young." They also gave everyone an “uncle,” an old soldier who taught them the mind and soldier service, and soldier's life. Then this "young" himself became "uncle" and gave his "young" the same instruction. Hundreds of years went by, and that one of my platoon, the reserve senior non-commissioned officer Akhtyrets with an earring in his ear and a crocheted nose, wiping his Nizhniy Novgorod, and wiping his tear imperceptibly, listening to the song, "the Cossack went far away," passed this instruction to me young hussar oath of 1911 goals. And what is surprising on the one hand, and quite understandable on the other hand - a lot of things in this admonition directly coincided with Suvorov's precepts. Here is this word: "If you ever have at least one soldier under command, remember that you are accountable to him before God, before the authorities and before your conscience."
        The Austrian troops against us, too, walked a step and it was now possible only a mile away — it seemed even the faces were already visible. Suddenly the Austrian system broke; platoons dusted "to the left round" and at a trot went back to the forest. The Austrians could not stand it.


  7. +16
    22 May 2018 09: 17
    Hungarian units were distinguished by high stamina and combat qualities. For example, the 38th and 39th Honored Infantry Divisions were one of the most illustrious front-line formations of the First World War, participating (the 39th division in the Gorlitsky breakthrough of 1915 along with the shock German divisions) in key operations.
  8. +16
    22 May 2018 09: 19
    But, at least off topic, the allied hussars in attack