Military Review

US blocked. UNSC will not be able to investigate events in the Gaza Strip

133
On Monday, the US envoy blocked the adoption by the UN Security Council of a statement calling for an independent investigation of the events on the border of the Gaza Strip and Israel, reports TASS.




The text of the draft communiqué stated that “the UN Security Council expresses its indignation and grieve over the death of Palestinian civilians who exercised their right to demonstrate peacefully”.

The document also called for “conducting an independent and transparent investigation of events.”

Recall that the mass demonstrations of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip continued from the end of March, and on Monday they broke out with a new force in connection with the opening ceremony of the US Embassy in Jerusalem.

According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, only yesterday, as a result of clashes on the border with Israel, 52 Palestinians died, more than 2-x thousand people received various injuries. In recent weeks, the Palestinian side has repeatedly appealed to the UN Security Council with a request to intervene in the situation, but so far there have not been emergency meetings with officials in connection with what is happening in the region.

Well, is it time to raise the question of depriving the US of the veto? ..
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
133 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. newcomer
    newcomer 15 May 2018 09: 00
    +7
    Well! for some reason I’m not surprised.
    1. Division DON-100
      Division DON-100 15 May 2018 09: 11
      +18
      Yes, actually there’s nothing to be surprised at. Israel is a terrorist state, with the support of even more terrorist USA, they are leading the genocide of the Palestinian population and not only it, hiding behind the slogans of the fight against terrorism.
      It’s just a question of who considers whom to be a terrorist. Hezbollah - in Israel and the United States are considered terrorists, although in Lebanon they are considered partisans who are fighting the occupying forces of Israel.
      Maybe it’s time already at the UN level to raise the issue of recognition of the United States and Israel as Zionist terrorist organizations around the world ?! True, the UN recently, is a conductor of the ideas of these very world terrorists. Maybe it's time to create an alternative UN?
      1. newcomer
        newcomer 15 May 2018 09: 17
        +7
        The question you raised is macropolitan. I'm talking about anology. when the Golden Eagles were burned alive on the Maidan, this was a manifestation of “freedom and democracy”. here a couple of fireplaces were thrown at Israeli warriors in response to the execution.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. newcomer
            newcomer 15 May 2018 09: 35
            +1
            Alexei, of course, all citizens of Israel can not be "rowed" with one comb. but the fact that the Israeli authorities did business is a fact. about the left Israelis: you know, I work with a Jew, our man is one hundred percent. even went to relatives in Israel, worked there, but did not take root. says he doesn’t stick there for our “Ivan“.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 09: 51
                +4
                Quote: DON-100 Division
                atalef karisha "

                Do you know Karisha personally?
                1. kipod
                  kipod 15 May 2018 10: 13
                  +7
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Quote: DON-100 Division
                  atalef karisha "

                  Do you know Karisha personally?

                  Why is he doing this?

                  Is it already evening in Komsomolsk?
                  Hey . Sanya !!
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 10: 59
                    0
                    Quote: kipod
                    Hey . Sanya !!

                    hi
                2. Division DON-100
                  Division DON-100 15 May 2018 10: 25
                  +13
                  Alexander Romanov (Sanya) Today, 09: 51 ↑
                  Do you know Karisha personally?
                  Firstly, Mr. Romanov does not need to Poke, I did not drink to the Brudershaft with you. Your rudeness on the site is well known, nevertheless learn the rules of good form and people will reach for you.
                  Secondly, your friendship with Atalef Karish is well known to the public of VO. So do not here about a personal acquaintance. I don’t need such acquaintances, I won’t be able to cope with such ones on one hectare, even if it’s too much.
                  So make no mistake.
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 11: 00
                    +6
                    Quote: DON-100 Division
                    First, the

                    Go to Hamas sign up
                3. Vanek
                  Vanek 15 May 2018 15: 14
                  +2
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Do you know personally?


                  Alexander hi
              2. newcomer
                newcomer 15 May 2018 09: 55
                +6
                Alexei, this is the place to be. most of those who left, to put it mildly, did not give a damn about the well from which they drank. therefore left_ not ours. our houses sit, or come back as my colleague.
          2. Ren
            Ren 15 May 2018 11: 21
            +4
            Quote: DON-100 Division
            Moreover, they invented a story with a “Lohokost” only in order to justify any crimes against humanity.

            Unfortunately, they did not come up with the Holocaust story, but only the Holocaust was directed against all the peoples who inhabited the territory of the Russian Empire, Russian peoples, carriers of the "Russian" civilization code, Jews - was one of such peoples, but for some reason the Israelis monetized it and became them waving like a flag. hi
            The Holocaust is indirectly related to Jews, as most of this people lived in the Russian Empire, fleeing the persecution of Europeans.
      2. high
        high 15 May 2018 10: 01
        +3
        In the Donbass, more than 4 thousand people have already died in the 10 years of the war, who is a terrorist ??
        1. newcomer
          newcomer 15 May 2018 10: 05
          +10
          naturally ukrlanda leadership.
        2. LSA57
          LSA57 15 May 2018 11: 10
          +4
          Quote: alta
          In the Donbass, more than 4 thousand people have already died in the 10 years of the war, who is a terrorist ??

          who in Donbass pinned up on tanks ???? kuev shelling ?????
        3. Incvizitor
          Incvizitor 15 May 2018 20: 37
          0
          who is the terrorist ??

          Not?
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22pP964AXfg
      3. kipod
        kipod 15 May 2018 10: 08
        +7
        Quote: DON-100 Division
        Yes, actually there’s nothing to be surprised at. Israel is a terrorist state, with the support of even more terrorist United States are genocide Palestinian population

        what are they doing at the fence?
        It seems like they climb to us, and not we to them
        1. Division DON-100
          Division DON-100 15 May 2018 10: 28
          +10
          kipod Today, 10:08 ↑
          It seems like they climb to us, and not we to them
          What are you talking about? But didn’t you occupy their territories?
          Your under-state is an abscess on the body of the Middle East and the sooner they cut it out, the faster peace will come there.
          1. taiga2018
            taiga2018 15 May 2018 10: 53
            +5
            Quote: DON-100 Division
            Your under-state is an abscess on the body of the Middle East and the sooner they cut it out, the faster peace will come there.

            What are you, they are sufferers, they have a holocaust, so they will not calm down until they destroy as many people as the Nazis destroyed ...
          2. Krasnodar
            Krasnodar 15 May 2018 11: 06
            +4
            Quote: DON-100 Division
            kipod Today, 10:08 ↑
            It seems like they climb to us, and not we to them
            What are you talking about? But didn’t you occupy their territories?
            Your under-state is an abscess on the body of the Middle East and the sooner they cut it out, the faster peace will come there.

            1) the question of whose territories they occupied did not like the Egyptians and Jordanians who occupied the Palestinian territories during the first Arab-Israeli war.
            2) Since 2005, there has not been a single Jew, soldier or other Israeli presence in Gaza.
            3) GDP per capita of non-state this year exceeded French and British
            4) Cut Israel?))) Get in line, it is long, but for some reason it is moving very slowly)))))))) If anyone comes up to the counter, it usually doesn’t come back or remains amputated, crying and at the UN hobbling over handouts and complaining
        2. LSA57
          LSA57 15 May 2018 11: 15
          +1
          Quote: kipod
          It seems like they climb to us, and not we to them

          Palestine is your territory ??????
          what are they doing at the fence?

          they shoot you from the fence ???????
        3. Olgovich
          Olgovich 15 May 2018 11: 23
          +3
          Quote: kipod
          what are they doing at the fence?
          It seems like they climb to us, and not we to them

          This is not a reason to arrange a bloody SLAUGHTER by armed to the teeth soldiers of unarmed people, although to me personally these people absolutely unsympathetic. The number of dead and wounded, as in a good battle! But how many Israelis were killed in this battle? Nobody? This is the slaughter.
          But the massacre is a crime, definitely.
        4. Starik72
          Starik72 15 May 2018 14: 58
          +2
          kipod. And you force Israel to return the territories of Palestine occupied by Israel, and the Palestinians will leave you behind, subject to your good neighborliness.
    2. kipod
      kipod 15 May 2018 10: 07
      +4
      Quote: newbie
      Well! for some reason I’m not surprised.

      I also
      Russia blocked the UN Security Council resolution on the investigation of the chemical attack in Syria, which was submitted by the United States.

      This was reported on Tuesday by Reuters.

      12 members of the UN Security Council voted in favor of the resolution, two countries - Russia and Bolivia - voted against. Read more here: https://ru.tsn.ua/svit/rossiya-v-sovbeze-oon-zabl
      okirovala-amerikanskuyu-rezolyuciyu-otnositelno-h
      imicheskoy-ataki-v-sirii-1137903.html
      1. newcomer
        newcomer 15 May 2018 10: 16
        +6
        correctly blocked. your Yankees' resolutions and leads to nothing but the death of innocent people. but Russia contributed to the work of the OPCW mission and the investigation of the chemical attacks.
      2. LSA57
        LSA57 15 May 2018 11: 22
        +3
        Quote: kipod
        I also

        how is the matter of violinists ????? what about himataka ?????? everything stalled !!!! the whole world realized that this is a LIE !!!!!
        who gave you the right to kill people as you said behind the fence ??????? they climbed over the fence ?????? they had a WEAPON ?????
        1. kipod
          kipod 15 May 2018 11: 25
          +3
          Quote: LSA57
          how is the matter of violinists ????? what about himataka ?????? everything stalled !!!! the whole world realized that this is a LIE !!!

          If your news does not tell about it - then do not think that the whole world has forgotten about it.
          1. LSA57
            LSA57 15 May 2018 11: 34
            +1
            Quote: kipod
            If your news does not tell about it - then do not think that the whole world has forgotten about it.

            where did they creak ?????? and how in the un exposed the himataka ????? with witnesses !!!!!! and a backfill question. why did the shelter stop financing white helmets? provocateurs pierced
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 15 May 2018 09: 00
    +2
    No wonder! Everything is natural. Nobody raises the question of depriving the US of the right of "Veto"?
    1. Romulus
      Romulus 15 May 2018 10: 19
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Nobody raises the question of depriving the US of the right of "Veto"?

      Figase yourself ... I ask a question. am am am
  3. olhon
    olhon 15 May 2018 09: 00
    +1
    Krajina supported?
  4. Zubr
    Zubr 15 May 2018 09: 05
    +3
    Well, I had no doubt about this. They do not need this investigation.
  5. Romanenko
    Romanenko 15 May 2018 09: 08
    +3
    When there will be a new Nuremberg trial, I really want to see Obama, Trump and other "friends" and "partners" in the dock there
  6. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 09: 10
    +12
    exercising their right to a peaceful demonstration ”
    That is, throwing stones at a soldier is now considered a peaceful demonstration, huh?
    1. LMN
      LMN 15 May 2018 09: 20
      +15
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      exercising their right to a peaceful demonstration ”
      That is, throwing stones at a soldier is now considered a peaceful demonstration, huh?

      And to answer this from a firearm, is this considered an adequate reaction?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 09: 21
        +14
        Quote: LMN
        make firearms to this, is this considered an adequate reaction?

        And the soldiers in response, also had to throw stones?
        An attempt to break through the border, soldiers of any country have the right to use weapons
        1. LMN
          LMN 15 May 2018 09: 58
          +3
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: LMN
          make firearms to this, is this considered an adequate reaction?

          And the soldiers in response, also had to throw stones?
          An attempt to break through the border, soldiers of any country have the right to use weapons

          I have a feeling that Israel is now being used hard.
          1. Paranoid50
            Paranoid50 15 May 2018 12: 36
            +2
            Quote: LMN
            I have a feeling that Israel is now being used hard.

            So, seventy years already use. The other day, just the date was. yes It seems that in 1948 there was the second (after Moses) case in history when Jews were led. laughing
        2. Puss in Boots
          Puss in Boots 15 May 2018 10: 11
          +8
          I’ll tell you, my friend, as a frontier! try to use weapons against unarmed people (I apologize for the taftalogy) and you don’t sit too long, my young friend))) hi
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 10: 28
            +7
            Quote: Cat in Boots
            I’ll tell you, my friend, as a frontier! try to use weapons against unarmed people (I apologize for taftalogy) and you don’t sit too long, my young friend))

            Who was planted?
            During the detention of a poaching vessel flying the DPRK flag, Russian border guards opened fire to kill. ... There are victims, one citizen of the DPRK is killed

            And the second, when you try to break through the border of a crowd that will throw stones at the border guards, you, as a border guard, will fall down, so as not to be responsible. Do I understand correctly?
            1. Filing
              Filing 15 May 2018 14: 47
              +2
              Dear, remember the Damansky island. So the Russians acted.
              1. Puss in Boots
                Puss in Boots 19 May 2018 05: 45
                0
                this case cannot be cited as an example, since it was an armed seizure of our territory hi
            2. Puss in Boots
              Puss in Boots 19 May 2018 05: 43
              0
              open the charter of the border troops !! and lo and behold - even directing weapons towards a neighboring state (except in the case of an armed breakthrough) is strictly prohibited; open fire in settlements (even into the air) is strictly prohibited !! It is strictly forbidden to send a cartridge to the chamber without a life threat to the members of the squad! etc. etc. hi
        3. Starik72
          Starik72 15 May 2018 15: 08
          +1
          Alexander Romanov. And you look at the map of Israel in 1947 when, by decision of the UN, they allocated Palestinian territory, and compare it with the map of the latest edition. And then write honestly who should throw stones at someone. Protector of the Israelites.
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 15 May 2018 09: 52
        +9
        The soldier should defend .. I’m not a fan of Jews, and probably even have a negative attitude towards them for the most part! But the policy of the Jews is correct .. it’s not dangerous to encroach on the life of our citizen, especially if he is to protect the homeland! I would like to our guys also shot back at provocateurs and chaos..but didn’t wait until one of them was killed! There will be science to others! If the Jews had little luck with someone, they would have been crushed .. but no, they live for now .. and thrive!
    2. Dym71
      Dym71 15 May 2018 09: 25
      +11
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      That is, throwing stones at a soldier is now considered a peaceful demonstration, huh?

      The right question is Alexander, only the Jews could have worked with bird cherry with hoses, and they clicked unarmed Arabs like sparrows. negative
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 09: 34
        +7
        Quote: Dym71
        The right question is Alexander, only the Jews could have worked with bird cherry with hoses, and they clicked unarmed Arabs like sparrows.

        How quickly you are from the opponents of the Islamists, switched to their side. You can just get fucked
        1. Dym71
          Dym71 15 May 2018 09: 47
          +4
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          How quickly you are from the opponents of the Islamists, switched to their side. You can just get fucked

          Arabs do-bulbs (even those who are not Islamists), IMHO, but we don’t have such "friends" for nothing, but if the Jews bring them to the left and right for a thousand or two a year nothing changes, we must stop such disturbances by non-lethal methods (especially when philanthropy is announced on every corner, etc.) or let them recognize the Palestinian state and bring down all at once. hi
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 09: 49
            +6
            Quote: Dym71
            or let them recognize the Palestinian state and bring down all at once.

            Good soul you man laughing
            1. Senior manager
              Senior manager 15 May 2018 14: 33
              +1
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Good soul you man

              But humanism of Israeli soldiers, or rather their command, touches me. For some reason, they did not put machine guns against stones and cocktails, but they were fighting, according to their statement, with the terrorists. Solid misunderstandings.
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 15 May 2018 09: 53
        +3
        For some reason, the next time the Arabs will think a lot, but is it worth it ... and the water cannons are ... well, washed for free .. wink
      3. Strips
        Strips 15 May 2018 10: 52
        +2
        Quote: Dym71
        clicked unarmed Arabs


        Yes, yes, of course, unarmed, come close to them and risk getting a bullet


        .13: 15. A group of terrorists, consisting of 6-8 people, tried to install an explosive device near the separation fence in the southern part of the sector. Terrorists fired at the military. The soldiers returned fire.

        13:30. IDF soldiers fired on in the northern part of the sector.

        13:45. A group of eight terrorists under cover of riots fired at soldiers in the northern part of the sector. The soldiers returned fire.
        1. Olgovich
          Olgovich 15 May 2018 11: 38
          +1
          Quote: Tiras
          13:15. A group of terrorists, consisting of 6-8 people, tried to install an explosive device near the separation fence in the southern part of the sector. Terrorists fired at the military. The soldiers returned fire.
          13:30. IDF soldiers fired on in the northern part of the sector.
          13:45. A group of eight terrorists under cover of riots fired at soldiers in the northern part of the sector. The soldiers returned fire.

          Yes, 52 killed Arabs and not a single wounded Jew.
          Such "shelling" ...
          1. Strips
            Strips 15 May 2018 12: 05
            +6
            Quote: Olgovich
            Yes, 52 killed Arabs and not a single wounded Jew.
            Such "shelling" ...


            And good. So the army works well and protects its soldiers.

            How many do you think wounded Jews should be in wounded Arabs? Or wounded Russians to wounded Arabs in Syria? What principle do you calculate?
            1. Olgovich
              Olgovich 15 May 2018 12: 20
              +2
              Quote: Tiras
              And good. So the army works well and protects its soldiers

              Good, yes. But it means this is completely different, namely that the army, armed to the teeth, organized a massacre of unarmed civilians.
              Quote: Tiras
              How many do you think wounded Jews should be in wounded Arabs? Or wounded Russians to wounded Arabs in Syria? What principle do you calculate?

              I do not have such calculations. But there is knowledge that when the army shoots civilians, then such a result is obtained. For they can kill, but they can’t.
              What's not clear?
              1. Strips
                Strips 15 May 2018 13: 13
                +4
                Quote: Olgovich
                namely, that the army, armed to the teeth, organized a massacre of unarmed civilians.


                This is a lie. I already showed it to you above, but you write lies again and again request


                Quote: Olgovich
                But there is knowledge that when the army shoots civilians, then such a result is obtained. For they can kill, but they can’t.
                What's not clear?


                It’s not clear where you are coming up with about unarmed civilians.

                If civilians who happened to be among the terrorists died, among those who threw Molotov cocktails, stones, shot at soldiers and planted explosive devices, that is, they turned out to be accidental, then they died by accident and there was no need to make claims against Israel.
                1. Olgovich
                  Olgovich 15 May 2018 14: 21
                  +1
                  Quote: Tiras
                  This is a lie. Above, I already have it for you showedbut you write lies again and again

                  Who is interested in your ostentatious LIES? request
                  Quote: Tiras
                  If civilians who happened to be among the terrorists died, among those who threw Molotov cocktails, stones, shot at soldiers and planted explosive devices, that is, they turned out to be accidental, then they died by accident and there was no need to make claims against Israel.

                  The fact that the dead are terrorists is, so far, only your idle chatter. With what fright do you killers believe? request What is one reason?
                  Quote: Tiras
                  they died by chance and no need to make claims against Israel.

                  This is generally beyond: for unintentional murder in court, often give real terms
    3. Petr1
      Petr1 15 May 2018 09: 43
      +3
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      exercising their right to a peaceful demonstration ”
      That is, throwing stones at a soldier is now considered a peaceful demonstration, huh?

      So, is it necessary to conduct an investigation, threw stones, or walked peacefully? Tovarisch novels you somehow lopsided in Jewish reasoning laughing
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 09: 47
        +8
        Quote: Petr1
        So, is it necessary to conduct an investigation, threw stones, or walked peacefully?

        You should work in the OSCE, they also go blind when necessary.
        At least show them a video, at least a photo.
        Always one answer, you need to investigate
        1. Petr1
          Petr1 15 May 2018 10: 00
          +1
          What does the obsession and the UN investigation have to do with it?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 10: 04
            +3
            Quote: Petr1
            What does the obsession and the UN investigation have to do with it?

            Despite the fact that you blind when it is beneficial to you.
        2. Sobol
          Sobol 15 May 2018 11: 12
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Petr1
          So, is it necessary to conduct an investigation, threw stones, or walked peacefully?

          You should work in the OSCE, they also go blind when necessary.
          At least show them a video, at least a photo.
          Always one answer, you need to investigate

          At the expense of stones:
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 15 May 2018 09: 57
        +8
        Yes, no one argues, it is necessary .. if the Jews shot at peacefully walking Arabs .. and punish the Jews in the furnace! Well, if the Arabs began to break through the border of the Jews and they shot them ... they shot the order ... !!! Well just imagine, peaceful Tajiks went in a crowd of five thousand people to our outpost .. even just without weapons shouting the slogans "We’ll go and kill everyone right now .. mom-dad tra-la-la" You understood what I mean, I would like to our guys pumped them with lead without hesitation .. until the last bullet .... !!!!!!!
        1. FC Rostov
          FC Rostov 15 May 2018 13: 05
          +1
          Tovaris, it’s painfully rich imagination in your head. Tajiks once stepped on a rake so that this will not happen again, believe me.
    4. 72jora72
      72jora72 15 May 2018 09: 51
      +4
      That is, throwing stones at a soldier is now considered a peaceful demonstration, huh?
      By your logic, when the son of our neighbors on the site once again pulls my daughter by the pigtail, then I have to go to them and break my father’s legs (and for one mother and grandmother).
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 15 May 2018 09: 52
        +11
        Quote: 72jora72
        By your logic, when the son of our neighbors on the site once again pulls my daughter by the pigtail, then I have to go to them and break my father’s legs (and for one mother and grandmother).

        You have another attempt to come up with a comparison. If you can’t do it yourself, call a friend, call the hall for help.
      2. Petr1
        Petr1 15 May 2018 09: 58
        +6
        Exactly so, after that, to take away the house and the land, to live for pleasure and wonder, but what are they throwing stones at us ???
      3. igorka357
        igorka357 15 May 2018 10: 08
        +5
        Yes ... I’ll go, and so I’ll tear his ears off .. I can tear it off, and I’ll explain to his dad popularly that if his son pulls my daughter’s hair once again .. then I will tear his son out of his arms! when your daughter is insulted and choked on a nearby frostbitten little boy? So he will grow up and your daughter God forbid that .. well that same .. scold him too? Sergey .. you forgive such nonsense! It’s necessary to beat once and it’s painful that The next time it wasn’t bad .. and the desolation in our life at the state level, especially those like Israel .. around which there are only well-wishers, death is like!
    5. Romulus
      Romulus 15 May 2018 10: 24
      +3
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      exercising their right to a peaceful demonstration ”
      That is, throwing stones at a soldier is now considered a peaceful demonstration, huh?

      Hi Sanya hi Aries business to collect 30 thousand will leave stones) A ​​joke of humor (And the phrase itself is a peaceful demonstration - throws stones ... (demon) comments))
    6. LSA57
      LSA57 15 May 2018 11: 26
      +1
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      That is, throwing stones at a soldier is now considered a peaceful demonstration, huh?

      and many dead?
      on the Maidan "Berkutovtsev" burned alive. and it was "democratic and revolutionary"
      1. Romulus
        Romulus 15 May 2018 12: 38
        +1
        Quote: LSA57
        on the Maidan "Berkutovtsev" burned alive. and it was "democratic and revolutionary"

        Sergey ... I’ll allow you to compare your comment - with AK, accompany the shutter when cocking - if you served, you will understand ..)
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 15 May 2018 09: 15
    +4
    Blocked - not surprising. It is not surprising that the United States has long put an American device on the UN and the UN Security Council.
    1. Romulus
      Romulus 15 May 2018 11: 11
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60

      1
      rotmistr60 (Gennady) Today, 09: 15
      Blocked - not surprising. It is not surprising that the United States has long put an American device on the UN and the UN Security Council.

      Gennady, you don’t worry so .. everything is exactly-Russia also put ..
  8. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 15 May 2018 09: 23
    +1
    It would be surprising if Russia blocked the US proposal for the DPRK ... or Yugoslavia ... or ... Someone already suggested that they lay their hopes only on their own forces and protect only their interests, which is numb ...
  9. Egorovich
    Egorovich 15 May 2018 09: 25
    +7
    The terrorist state vetoed the investigation of the terrorist acts of another state, which was to be expected.
    1. Strips
      Strips 15 May 2018 10: 38
      +4
      Read and cried crying laughing
  10. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 15 May 2018 09: 30
    +3
    Of course, the United States cannot allow an investigation, otherwise the United States and Israel would have to practice rhetoric in order to convincingly explain: why was the embassy moved, if it was obvious that this would give rise to another massacre on both sides of the conflict and the escalation of general tension in the region. The answer is obvious: fomenting a new war in the region - but this does not correspond to the image of “peacekeepers” and “victims of unprovoked aggression” ...
    1. Strips
      Strips 15 May 2018 09: 55
      +7
      Quote: Alex-a832
      why was the embassy moved, if it was obvious that this would give rise to another massacre on both sides of the conflict and the escalation of general tension in the region.



      Because wolves are afraid not to go to the forest. Because it is right and fair.

      If Russia was afraid of sanctions, conflict and the escalation of general tension in the region, then Crimea would not be part of Russia.
    2. farcop
      farcop 15 May 2018 10: 21
      +5
      Quote: Alex-a832
      Of course, the US cannot allow an investigation.
      Since the start of the Syrian conflict in 2011, Russia has used its veto power 12 times, including against an independent investigation. Continue: of course ...
      Quote: Alex-a832
      why was the embassy transferred
      it’s none of your business where the US embassy will be, from the word at all. NOT YOURS !!! Are you jealous? Carry too.
      1. Olgovich
        Olgovich 15 May 2018 12: 02
        0
        Quote: farcop
        including against independent investigation

        What, in y, an independent investigation?
        An independent investigation is run by the OPCW. And the United States blocked the Russian project to support the OPCW’s mission to investigate the “attack” in the Duma.
        1. farcop
          farcop 15 May 2018 12: 07
          +3
          .
          Quote: Olgovich
          And the USA blocked the Russian project
          A Russia was blocking ...
          1. Olgovich
            Olgovich 15 May 2018 12: 22
            0
            Quote: farcop
            A Russia was blocking ...

            ... That a specific investigation of the so-called the attack in the Duma had nothing to do with it.
            Unlike the OPCW mission.
            Which also works.
            1. farcop
              farcop 15 May 2018 14: 16
              +2
              Quote: Olgovich
              That a specific investigation of the so-called the attack in the Duma had nothing to do with it.
              That is, Cho was uncomfortably blocked, but what was easier. So what? Americans do the same.
              1. Olgovich
                Olgovich 16 May 2018 05: 21
                0
                Quote: farcop
                That is, Cho was uncomfortably blocked, but what was easier

                Conducted what was relevant.
  11. evil partisan
    evil partisan 15 May 2018 09: 32
    +3
    But the UN investigation into the death of dolphins in the area of ​​the Kerch bridge, I think mattresses will still push through. yes
  12. aszzz888
    aszzz888 15 May 2018 09: 36
    +3
    Everything according to the Jewish-Jewish scenario! They do not care about ALL international laws ... angry
  13. Engineer
    Engineer 15 May 2018 09: 50
    +4
    Well, is it time to raise the question of depriving the US of the veto? ..

    laughing laughing laughing laughing Even the Soviet Union with its influence and satellites could not arrange this then. And now even Belarusians will not support Russia. And in the UN Security Council, Russia has only one hypothetical ally, who abstains all the time. Conclusion: 1.USA does not care about the UN. 2. The UN has no influence on the United States. 3. The UN is a meaningless organization for superpowers.
    1. Severok
      Severok 15 May 2018 11: 35
      0
      The UN has long been discredited by the actions of the United States and its subsidiary. Regarding Israel: they didn’t have the right to shoot until the armed Palestinian crossed the border; armed Palestinians have the full moral right to use weapons against Israel until Israel releases the occupied territories.
      As for the Yankees: it’s time for Russia to do the same with them as they do with the whole world. Namely, to equip partisans and insurgents in those territories where the "American national interest" is in control and for any reason from the side of the country of Pind-Osia make a fuss about the whole world.
  14. Strips
    Strips 15 May 2018 09: 51
    +7
    And rightly so.
    The UN bias against Israel has long been a known fact.

    I thought the Russians felt good in the place of Israel when they were made invaders at the UN and that only Veto saves them and Syria at the UN, but it turns out that we still have to wait wink

    Of course, the United States blocked this resolution because it will try to demonize Israel, although it does it right.

    That people died is life. They are paid by Hamas terrorists for demonstrations, specially pushing adolescents in front of themselves behind them.
    There were attempts to carry out terrorist attacks during the demonstrations, threw Molotov cocktails, and Israeli soldiers were fired upon.

    The Israeli army took the right actions, which they will try to turn into a war crime.
    1. Olgovich
      Olgovich 15 May 2018 12: 13
      0
      Quote: Tiras
      That, that people died - such is life. They are paid by Hamas terrorists for demonstrations, specially pushing adolescents in front of themselves behind them.
      There were attempts to carry out terrorist attacks during the demonstrations, threw Molotov cocktails, and Israeli soldiers were fired upon.
      The Israeli army took the right actions, which they will try to turn into a war crime.

      Where are the dead by the Israelis in this "battle"? No?
      Then this is called the slaughter of the civilian army. And, accordingly, a war crime.
      This is life, say? Such was life in 1939-45. But then not everyone seemed fair, yes ....
      And today, it’s already quite ....

      PS Israel is much prettier to me than all Arabs.
      But SO do not.
  15. Dormidont
    Dormidont 15 May 2018 09: 54
    0
    For no one is allowed to respond to US-Israeli aggression
  16. high
    high 15 May 2018 09: 58
    +2
    In Syria, over 4 thousand people died in 500 years, does the UN Security Council care about this ???
    1. Dym71
      Dym71 15 May 2018 10: 08
      +1
      Quote: alta
      In Syria, over 4 thousand people died in 500 years, does the UN Security Council care about this ???

      And you don’t translate arrows, everyone must be duped for their sins.
      1. Strips
        Strips 15 May 2018 10: 35
        +5
        Quote: Dym71
        everyone must be duped for their sins.


        Well, yes - sanctions, etc. There are enough examples.
        Even the Veto does not help some against sanctions.
        1. Dym71
          Dym71 15 May 2018 10: 42
          +2
          Quote: Tiras
          Well, yes - sanctions, etc.

          My comment is about something else, although bring it to the heap, your brother just to change Temko! laughing
          Victor, is it really so hard for you to get sanctions in Russia?
          Well, pour out my soul,
          Why the hell are you evil?
          Al in a Milanese salad
          Not enough truffles? wink
          1. Strips
            Strips 15 May 2018 10: 49
            +4
            Quote: Dym71
            although bring down to the heap, your brother just to change Temko!


            The point is not to change the topic of showing a simple thing that the UN Security Council is engaged in trifles, and not just trifles, it is simply not able to deal with because of the Veto of different countries and it is necessary to go some other way.
  17. igorka357
    igorka357 15 May 2018 10: 01
    +7
    Now change the Jewish soldiers to Russian border guards .. how much would we hear laudatory reviews, such as “fill up dogs .. didn’t put out a terrorist threat .. well done guys .. guard the homeland” and that would be true! And the Jews did the right thing !!!!
  18. farcop
    farcop 15 May 2018 10: 11
    +3
    And of course, they forgot to tell who and why used the veto right for the last time. Here is Russia, for example?
    1. Dym71
      Dym71 15 May 2018 10: 17
      +1
      Quote: farcop
      And of course, they forgot to tell who and why used the veto right for the last time. Here is Russia, for example?

      Why are you getting smaller, since you have everything according to the law? They would have taken it, and let the commission unilaterally come to them or created their own with the involvement of foreign specialists.
      1. farcop
        farcop 15 May 2018 10: 24
        +4
        Quote: Dym71
        Would take, and let commission
        So Russia would take, and let an independent commission in Syria. Why are you getting smaller, since you have everything according to the law?
        1. Dym71
          Dym71 15 May 2018 10: 30
          +1
          Are you talking about it? wink
          Sample collection at the site of the alleged chemical attack in the Syrian Duma has been completed. Their analysis will take at least three to four weeks, the press service of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) reports.
          1. farcop
            farcop 15 May 2018 10: 39
            +3
            Quote: Dym71
            Are you talking about it?
            about this: UN Security Council: Russia vetoed a US resolution on Syria.
            1. Dym71
              Dym71 15 May 2018 11: 01
              +1
              Quote: farcop
              Russia vetoed US resolution on Syria.

              And did you understand the reasons for vetoing? You are aware that the main reason is the prevention of such an abomination:

              the consequences are known to all!
              1. farcop
                farcop 15 May 2018 11: 12
                +2
                Quote: Dym71
                preventing such an abomination
                And where is the problem, to prevent such an abomination and attacked Iraq. It was said by Paul (that you didn’t start to boil the noodles): that such a quantity paralyzed the work of the department. Well, which means that today the USA vetoed correctly to prevent such an abomination.
                1. Dym71
                  Dym71 15 May 2018 11: 31
                  0
                  Quote: farcop
                  you didn’t start boiling noodles

                  laughing
                  On February 5, 2003, a month before the invasion, Powell spoke at the UN Security Council substantiating the need for a war. In his speech, he referred to "first-hand information about the factories on wheels and on rails for the production of biological weapons," saying that the source is a witness, since "he himself ran one of these enterprises." Now it became known that this source came up with this whole story.

                  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/feb/16/col
                  in-powell-cia-curveball
                  1. farcop
                    farcop 15 May 2018 11: 46
                    +3
                    Do you really believe that this was the cause of the war?
                    1. Dym71
                      Dym71 15 May 2018 12: 01
                      0
                      Quote: farcop
                      Do you really believe that this was the cause of the war?

                      Nah, I’m talking about specific remote investigations, in which the Anglo-Saxons more than doubled a hand, and now they are being promoted everywhere, including to investigate the OPCW in Syria.
                      1. farcop
                        farcop 15 May 2018 12: 04
                        +3
                        Are you trying to substantiate the veto of Russia? Do not. And so it is clear. Covered beloved Assad, that's all.
            2. ML-334
              ML-334 15 May 2018 11: 11
              0
              The transfer of the embassy, ​​in my opinion, is needed by the United States in order to invigorate Europe through migrants.
              1. farcop
                farcop 15 May 2018 11: 16
                +3
                Quote: ML-334
                The transfer of the embassy, ​​in my opinion, is needed by the United States in order to invigorate Europe through migrants.
                And how many migrants came to Europe due to the transfer of the embassy? How many migrants in Europe gathered for rallies?
                1. ML-334
                  ML-334 15 May 2018 11: 18
                  0
                  It’s not just a matter of excitement to action.
                  1. farcop
                    farcop 15 May 2018 11: 27
                    +2
                    Quote: ML-334
                    It’s not just a matter of excitement to action.

                    Quote: farcop
                    How many migrants in Europe gathered for rallies?
                    I asked, like how much excited?
                    1. ML-334
                      ML-334 15 May 2018 11: 31
                      0
                      I think it’s not yet evening. And yet, this is my opinion and I do not impose it on anyone.
                      1. farcop
                        farcop 15 May 2018 11: 37
                        +1
                        Quote: ML-334
                        I think it’s not yet evening. And yet, this is my opinion and I do not impose it on anyone.
                        I personally greatly respect your method of posing the question, without communication, agree with it or disagree.
  19. cats
    cats 15 May 2018 10: 54
    0
    Hand washes a hand ..
    So it became difficult to live in all kinds of hats, and if you still haven't covered accomplices ..
    All such clever became, so informed, what rights there remember ..
    What is it now, bibi with dona can’t even beat anyone? ..
  20. Dym71
    Dym71 15 May 2018 12: 16
    0
    Quote: farcop
    Are you trying to substantiate the veto of Russia? Do not. And so it is clear. Covered beloved Assad, that's all.

    My dear, turn off the tumbler switch off please! stop
    The Hague, Netherlands - May 4, 2018. The initial deployment of a fact-finding mission in Doum, Syrian Arab Republic, has been completed. The Director General thanked the members of the mission team for their courage and professionalism. Samples were delivered to the OPCW laboratory, where they will be separated, and then sent to laboratories designated by the OPCW. Sample analysis can take at least three to four weeks. In the meantime, the mission will continue its work to gather additional information and materials.

    https://www.opcw.org/news/article/opcw-spokespers
    ons-statement-on-fact-finding-mission-deployment-
    to-douma /
    1. farcop
      farcop 15 May 2018 12: 33
      +2
      Quote: Dym71
      My dear, turn off the tumbler switch off please!
      And besides how to be rude, what else can you do? You vetoed, explained to you how they would bypass you, and there you agreed. The fact is, you are vetoing the Assad, and so 12 times since the beginning of this conflict. And here is the saying: there’s nothing to nod at the mirror ...
      1. Dym71
        Dym71 15 May 2018 13: 35
        0
        Quote: farcop
        And besides how to be rude, what else can you do?

        What do you follow when calling the use of phraseology rudeness? Continuation of the saying
        Quote: farcop
        nothing to nod at the mirror ...
        I know, but I do not blame you for insulting with a hint of a crooked face. winked
        Quote: farcop
        You vetoed, explained to you how they would bypass you, and there you agreed.

        Not only agreed, but interacted with the mission and provided access, and these are two big differences!
        Quote: farcop
        The fact is, you are vetoing the Assad

        And on April 17 you organized a shelling of a UN security mission in the Duma - a fact!
        So ok? repeat
        1. farcop
          farcop 15 May 2018 14: 13
          +1
          Quote: Dym71
          What are you guided by
          Unwillingness to listen to rudeness from you.
          Quote: Dym71
          I do not blame you for insulting with a hint of a crooked face.
          Well, I just continued your phraseology, in the sense of how it comes around
          Quote: Dym71
          And on April 17 you organized a shelling of a UN security mission in the Duma - a fact!
          is not a fact. is there a serious proof, or a fast? But the Russian veto has no other reason than to shield Assad. Can explain, I do not promise to agree, but I promise to read seriously.
          Quote: Dym71
          So ok?
          So, bye, in parallel.
          1. Dym71
            Dym71 15 May 2018 14: 32
            0
            Quote: farcop
            Well, I just continued your phraseology

            So it was like rudeness? belay
            Quote: farcop
            is there a serious proof?

            Yes, we don’t shoot by ourselves.
            Quote: farcop
            But the Russian veto has no other reason than to shield Assad.

            Do you have a serious proof? After all, you also rejected the Russian draft resolution of the UN-OPCW mission in Syria - a fact!
            1. farcop
              farcop 15 May 2018 14: 48
              +1
              Quote: Dym71
              So it was like rudeness?
              Yours My yes.
              Quote: Dym71
              Yes, we don’t shoot by ourselves.
              This is not proof, this is speculation and speculation.
              Quote: Dym71
              Do you have a serious proof? After all, you also rejected the Russian draft resolution of the UN-OPCW mission in Syria - a fact!
              We said why Russia is blocking Assad, covering its path with branches from the UN. Let's finish this, then talk about the draft resolution of the UN-OPCW mission in Syria.
              1. Dym71
                Dym71 15 May 2018 15: 24
                0
                Quote: farcop
                Yours Yes, I think so.

                And in my opinion you had to cheer up from a state of ignoring obvious things, I was not rude in my thoughts.
                Quote: farcop
                This is not proof, this is speculation and speculation.

                So you indulge in them when you make unsubstantiated statements in the style of:
                "But the Russian veto has no other reason than to shield Assad."
                Quote: farcop
                Let's end this

                Ein Beyot bully
                1. farcop
                  farcop 15 May 2018 15: 32
                  +1
                  Quote: Dym71
                  Ein Beyot
                  and on ein and judgment ein. hi
  21. 1536
    1536 15 May 2018 14: 15
    0
    A barbaric country, these USA, you can’t say otherwise. That is why the United States will never become 3-m Rome, no matter how they tried, because the barbarians destroyed Rome in due time!
  22. Babermetis
    Babermetis 15 May 2018 15: 19
    +3
    Restless Turks tried to spoil the holiday with the transfer of the embassy. As a result, living space in the sector of the city of Aza, and not of GAZ, the cities of Rafiah and Hanyunes - increased for the benefit of the Arab population ... pat the comrades, the leaders of Hamas are great leaders of the masses and the best puppeteers in theaters in Turkey, Iran and Qatar. Applause comrades! Bravo !!!
  23. brigadir
    brigadir 15 May 2018 17: 59
    +1
    So that's great. Israel has an ally capable of supporting at the right time.
    It is clear that without an American veto, ANY anti-Israeli resolution at the UN will take place automatically.
    Israel, like the USA. shares Western liberal and democratic values ​​and, if you look at things impartially, then any country, really looking at the provocations of the Arabs of the Gaza Strip, should have acted like the United States.
  24. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 15 May 2018 20: 57
    0
    A fisherman sees a fisherman from far away ... So the US supports Israel ...
  25. Nikolay Kuznetsov
    Nikolay Kuznetsov 16 May 2018 12: 32
    0
    Once I sympathized with the United States after those collapsed skyscrapers. And I probably could understand .., but now, after an open hypocrisy, a disregard for international laws, utter nonsense at all and everything ... at least with you, it will happen to you, .. don’t give a damn ..
    1. borberd
      borberd 16 May 2018 23: 15
      -1
      Quote: Nikolai Kuznetsov
      but now after open hypocrisy, a disregard for international laws.


      The same can be said about you, which is why sanctions have been imposed on you.
  26. borberd
    borberd 16 May 2018 23: 12
    -1
    Quote: Starik72
    kipod. And you force Israel to return the territories of Palestine occupied by Israel, and the Palestinians will leave you behind, subject to your good neighborliness.

    78% of Palestine is occupied by Jordanians, 13% by Syrians, and only 9% by the “good” UN divided between Israel and ... Arabs, mind you, there were no Palestinians then, they appeared only in 1964, having stolen the name of the territory so that any thought that Palestine belongs to the Palestinians.
    The Arab did not like that Israel got as much as 4% of Palestine, and they started a war to pick up those 4% ... - you know the result.
  27. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 16 May 2018 23: 22
    +3
    US blocked UN Security Council


    All countries are equal, but some are more equal in the UN.

    The mattresses were stunned with happiness, I wish these stupid fat basses a war on their territory, a war to destroy.
    1. borberd
      borberd 16 May 2018 23: 25
      -1
      it is worth recalling that Russia quite recently several times blocked anti-Syrian resolutions and decisions. So there is another question, who is more even.
      Do not wish others what you do not want yourself.
      1. Sands Careers General
        Sands Careers General 16 May 2018 23: 35
        +3
        Answer me, who was stunned by impunity, and brought war to my land in the Donbass?
        You are just a disenfranchised vassal of a territorial formation called "Israel", so who is "more equal" or equal, I know better.