Military Review

Entered the responsibility area of ​​NORAD. The United States announced the interception of Russian Tu-95

44
The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) stated that the American F-22 fighters intercepted two Russian Tu-95 bomber in the air defense identification zone near Alaska. It is reported by The Washington Free Beacon, citing the representative of the command of Scott Miller.


Entered the responsibility area of ​​NORAD. The United States announced the interception of Russian Tu-95


Two F-22 NORAD fighters intercepted and identified two Russian Tu-95 long-range bomber flying in the air defense identification zone near the west coast of Alaska, north of the Aleutian Islands
- Said the American military.

According to him, two Tu-95 entered the two-hundred-mile (320 kilometers) NORAD area of ​​responsibility over the Bering Sea. After that, American aircraft tracked them until they left the air defense identification zone.

The representative of the American command noted that the bombers did not cross the air borders of the United States and Canada, flew only over international waters and did not violate international agreements.

As reported by the Ministry of Defense, Tu-95MS, accompanied by anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142, carried out planned flights over the neutral waters of the Arctic Ocean, the Bering Sea and the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. In particular, they worked refueling in the air. The aircraft were accompanied by MiG-31 and Su-35 fighters.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Teberii
    Teberii 12 May 2018 11: 18
    +3
    Let them know that our armor is strong and strong.
    1. maxim947
      maxim947 12 May 2018 11: 25
      +14
      Intercepted it loudly, just escorted
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 12 May 2018 11: 27
        +14
        Interception of an air target is necessary if the protected airspace of the state is violated by the air means of the alleged enemy. While there is no violation of the border (in this case, airspace) there is no interception. Departure for interception means a possible or apparent violation of the country's airspace.
        Those. F-22 flew to ensure the possibility of interception in case of violation of airspace by our aircraft.
        There was no interception. There was a flight to intercept. Or the journalists are stupid, or the translator smile
        1. Merold
          Merold 12 May 2018 11: 46
          +1
          Quote: Thrall
          Interception of an air target is necessary if the protected airspace of the state is violated by the air means of the alleged enemy. While there is no violation of the border (in this case, airspace) there is no interception.


          Quote: Thrall

          There was no interception. There was a flight to intercept. Or the journalists are stupid, or the translator smile

          Thanks to the experts.
          Su-27 intercepted by an American reconnaissance aircraft near the Russian border

          MOSCOW, Jan 29 - RIA News. The Su-27 intercepted the US Navy’s EP-3E "Aries II" electronic reconnaissance aircraft near the border with Russia, reported in the Ministry of Defense.

          https://ria.ru/defense_safety/20180129/1513562289
          .html
      2. Grandfather Makar
        Grandfather Makar 12 May 2018 11: 46
        +3
        Quote: maxim947
        Intercepted it loudly, just escorted

        Exactly so, they weren’t even particularly hiding and all the relevant services were warned .. They simply worked out refueling in the air, but the Mig-31 obviously flew with “daggers”. Let them get used, bye laughing
        1. LMN
          LMN 12 May 2018 11: 55
          +6
          Quote: Ded-Makar
          Quote: maxim947
          Intercepted it loudly, just escorted

          But the MiG-31 was clearly flying with “daggers”.

          Obviously?) lol
          Where does this conclusion come from? request
          Are they now constantly with daggers?)
          1. Grandfather Makar
            Grandfather Makar 12 May 2018 14: 16
            +3
            Quote: LMN
            Where does this conclusion come from? request
            Are they now constantly with daggers?)

            Maybe with dummies ... No wonder such a sharp US reaction! This is a planned watch near our territory! And this will be on an ongoing basis (will simply change)
            Alaska looks and waits with longing! laughing
            1. lis-ik
              lis-ik 12 May 2018 15: 31
              0
              Quote: Ded-Makar
              Alaska looks and waits with longing!

              Vital! What is Alaska waiting for? While Russia joins, I'm afraid the United States will not bear such a burden.
          2. vovanpain
            vovanpain 12 May 2018 14: 32
            +4
            Quote: LMN
            Where does this conclusion come from?

            From the slogans laughing If MiG 31 means necessarily with a "Dagger" or
            Quote: Ded-Makar
            Maybe with dummies ..

            laughing laughing And if Tu 95, then be sure to have a vigorous bomb laughing after all;
            Quote: Ded-Makar
            Alaska looks and waits with longing!

            wassat
            Quote: Ded-Makar
            No wonder this reaction is harsh USA

            Calm down Grandfather, this is a routine, ours fly, they accompany, they fly, we accompany. wink
            1. Grandfather Makar
              Grandfather Makar 12 May 2018 14: 37
              +2
              Quote: vovanpain
              Calm down Grandfather, this is a routine, ours fly, they accompany, they fly, we accompany. wink

              And I am very calm ...! Usually they scream when we fly to England near the Baltic states ...
              And here, next to Alaska, as usual, they flew by and immediately “intercepted” ha ha ha .. This is very pleasing!
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 12 May 2018 14: 48
          +2
          Quote: Ded-Makar
          But the MiG-31 was clearly flying with “daggers”.

          The main purpose of the “Dagger” is anti-ship, and in this case they accompanied the Tu-95 as interceptors to protect them from adversary aircraft. Why is the MiG-31 needed such a “Dagger”? Or is he, in your understanding, no longer an interceptor fighter, but exclusively a “dagger”? what
      3. Andrey K
        Andrey K 12 May 2018 12: 05
        +6
        ... the United States announced the interception of Russian Tu-95 ...

        Cheap sketches designed for a chewing herd of geldings on TVs.
        Escort services called loudly "interception" laughing
        1. san4es
          san4es 12 May 2018 12: 44
          +1
          Quote: Andrey K
          .... Escort services are called loudly "interception" laughing

          hi ... Andrei ... They have long known "face-to-face" yes
          A spokesman for the Northern Command of the US Armed Forces confirmed that the U.S. military raised fighter jets to intercept Russian Tu-95 aircraft off the coast of Alaska. The incident occurred on the evening of April 17, 2017 local time. The U.S. discontent caused the bombers to be inside the American air defense identification zone. At the same time, Washington confirmed that the planes did not violate the country's airspace.
          Apr 19 2017 year
        2. Merold
          Merold 12 May 2018 13: 53
          0
          Quote: Andrey K
          ... the United States announced the interception of Russian Tu-95 ...

          Cheap sketches designed for a chewing herd of geldings on TVs.
          Escort services called loudly "interception" laughing


          what
      4. SSR
        SSR 12 May 2018 12: 15
        +1
        Quote: maxim947
        Intercepted it loudly, just escorted

        It is a pity there is no information on the Su and MiGs, if they walked tightly then F22, their presence could be a surprise.
      5. Tiksi-3
        Tiksi-3 12 May 2018 12: 24
        +1
        Quote: maxim947
        Intercepted it loudly, just escorted

        laughing wassat and when do we intercept over international waters? accompany the same? laughing
      6. NEXUS
        NEXUS 12 May 2018 12: 39
        +3
        Quote: maxim947
        Intercepted it loudly, just escorted

        The usual procedure. We also accompany them Poseidons and drive to the cinema. Walking along the promenade you know is very useful. Well, our pilots Bears respect for endurance and patience.
        1. san4es
          san4es 12 May 2018 13: 18
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          ... The usual procedure.,.

          hi... I wonder how the Bears have defense? .. What are his EW tools capable of? recourse

          ... About his artillery there is infa
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 12 May 2018 12: 51
      +1
      To cancel the agreement on the free transfer of part of the Bering Sea by our liberals and you can fly safely. All one, since the United States does not recognize international law. winked
      1. Grandfather Makar
        Grandfather Makar 12 May 2018 14: 49
        +2
        Quote: siberalt
        To cancel the agreement on the free transfer of part of the Bering Sea by our liberals and you can fly safely. All one, since the United States does not recognize international law. winked

        I agree in principle, but our liberals will be against ..! In 2015, we seized vast territories According to the International Law! The security area has increased significantly.
        Mig-31 very effectively intercepts everything!
        1. ANCIENT
          ANCIENT 12 May 2018 15: 10
          +2
          Vitaly, tell me, which territories did you grab from? And with whom? Who is this “we”? I don’t remember anything like that for Russia! !!
    3. Maz
      Maz 12 May 2018 19: 44
      0
      This is not the whole truth, here the comrades corrected the author:
      Amusingly
  2. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 12 May 2018 11: 18
    +6
    Well done! Cheered up the "partners"! good Bear is a great name for an airplane! Let them know - the bear can not be angry! No. hi
  3. jncnfdybr
    jncnfdybr 12 May 2018 11: 25
    +1
    So where is our note of protest? That supposedly the interception was very dangerous, created a dangerous situation, etc. etc. )))
    1. ANCIENT
      ANCIENT 12 May 2018 11: 37
      +5
      Composer on vacation, wassat He left and took the treble clef to the notes with him! !! crying
    2. Avis-bis
      Avis-bis 13 May 2018 13: 10
      0
      Quote: jncnfdybr
      So where is our note of protest? That supposedly the interception was very dangerous, created a dangerous situation, etc. etc. )))

      And why do we hysteria, as the most incredible opponent does? Well, we met, waved to each other and dispersed.
  4. taiga2018
    taiga2018 12 May 2018 11: 35
    +1
    this is all nonsense, given the fact that their reconnaissance aircraft literally "settled" at our borders ...
    1. Fayth
      Fayth 12 May 2018 11: 53
      +2
      Hooray to the patriots, it doesn’t matter, they are happy that something else is flying with us.
  5. Maximys
    Maximys 12 May 2018 11: 36
    +1
    Well, our "partners" do not like proportions. In the Western media, such actions are only a military threat from the side of Russia, presented to the leader of world democracy.
  6. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 12 May 2018 11: 38
    +5
    F-22 got up, took pictures and left, completing their mission. Tu-95 continued the mission. The pilots did the daily work, but! - a small-caliber press attache comes out trying to suck something extraordinary out of the aircraft contact. And the blizzard raced over the Internet about the interception.
  7. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 12 May 2018 11: 40
    +3
    It was necessary for the pilot of the "raptor" to send a warning wassat "Do not fly high hypoxia will be!" sad Their airplane will fall, they will blame us! ! am
  8. Guru
    Guru 12 May 2018 11: 44
    +1
    It is strange as that, and not a word about the Unprofessionalism of our military. Apparently due to the presence of the MiG-31 and Su-35. laughing
    1. Tiksi-3
      Tiksi-3 12 May 2018 12: 25
      +1
      Quote: Guru
      It is strange as that, and not a word about the Unprofessionalism of our military. Apparently due to the presence of the MiG-31 and Su-35

      this is apparently due to the fact that there were no moments or dryers nearby - maybe fu22 scared them? wassat
  9. newcomer
    newcomer 12 May 2018 11: 47
    0
    Interestingly, our Sushka and Migu copied well the “prints” of the efka. and how the Yankees were afraid to even appear in the air defense zone or our fighters in Syria.
  10. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 May 2018 11: 48
    +4
    Nothing special, in general, happened ... Let the turbines warm up to the Raptor. Useful for resource development. Anyway ... Look at such a huge giant - affects the endocrine system of pilots ... wassat
  11. Wlad sttern
    Wlad sttern 12 May 2018 11: 57
    +1
    I hope in the confusion our unscrewed something secret from the Raptor!
  12. daodejin
    daodejin 12 May 2018 12: 08
    +1
    I can imagine what kind of hysteria the United States raised in the opposite situation. It would start: “dangerously close”, “provoke”, etc.
  13. The comment was deleted.
    1. LMN
      LMN 12 May 2018 12: 30
      +6
      Quote: Analyzer
      It was necessary to open the bombs to show the Caliber, the F 22 would blow off the wind. Russia gets up from its knees where we want to fly and no one will tell us. It’s time for these F 22 to drive away the TU 95 anti-aircraft weapons, it’s time to act very strictly, the United States is afraid of us, and Europe is terrified of us

      Even I am terrified of you belay lol
      1. Mikhail m
        Mikhail m 12 May 2018 20: 17
        0
        Terrified the entire population of the site. I wonder what word formed the basis of the nickname "Analyzer"?
    2. Marconi41
      Marconi41 12 May 2018 14: 55
      0
      It was necessary to open the bombers

      Funny to read! Do you wish our pilots evil? After opening the hatches knock down immediately!
  14. K-50
    K-50 12 May 2018 13: 52
    0
    Not all pin dos itself rub near our borders, it's time to get an answer. yes
  15. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 12 May 2018 18: 40
    0
    They didn’t fly professionally ...
  16. 1536
    1536 13 May 2018 08: 27
    0
    It is good that the "zone of responsibility of NORAD" does not pass along the borders of the Moscow region. And how "good" the headlines in the news feeds on the Russian Internet: "... US Air Force intercepted (!) Russian bombers".
    Previously, in Soviet times, such information was classified as "secret." For what? Very simple? There is a confrontation in the air between Russian aviation and US and NATO aviation, exercises, so to speak, so that if all interested parties know what each side is capable of, and where is that notorious trait that you should not cross. I, as a civilian, would be more interested in, for example, the life of Americans in Moscow, for example, either in St. Petersburg, or in Sverdlovsk. What are they doing, what are they doing, does our police “intercept” them for illegal actions or rudeness, well, these ordinary Americans, who, they say, have enough clothes in Russia, or maybe we need to say thanks to them for something ... And the military themselves will figure out what's what.
    But since this does not happen (I'm talking about the lack of information about ordinary Americans who are in Russia), why is our Foreign Ministry not indignant at the unprofessional actions of American pilots dangerously close to Russian planes? laughing
  17. Avis-bis
    Avis-bis 13 May 2018 13: 12
    0
    two hundred miles (320 kilometers)

    And what about the sea stopped using nautical miles?