Military Review

Will Russia supply Syria with C-300? The Ministry of Defense told

154
Russia may supply Syria with the C-300 anti-aircraft systems, but so far the decision on supplies has not been made, reports Interfax statement of Deputy Defense Minister Alexander Fomin.


Will Russia supply Syria with C-300? The Ministry of Defense told


While there are no such solutions. If they are accepted, why not. Syria, fortunately, is not under sanctions,
Fomin said, answering the question whether the Russian Federation will supply C-300 to Syria.

On the possibility of supplying Damascus systems C-300 "Favorite" Russian military and diplomats said after the impact of the Western Coalition on Syria on 14 in April of April.

19 April, Syrian Ambassador to the Russian Federation Riyad Haddad, answering the relevant question of the agency, said that the long-range air defense systems C-300 began work in Syria a month ago. But this was refuted by a Russian military-diplomatic source.

The Syrian government forces do not have a Russian C-300 anti-aircraft missile system,
said a source to the agency. According to him, the Syrian forces are armed with other air defense systems, such as Soviet development, as well as modern Russian complexes, for example, the Pantsir.

In late April, Colonel-General Sergei Rudskoy, head of the Main Operational Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, announced that Russia plans to supply new complexes to the SAR.

Russian specialists will continue training Syrian military personnel, and will also assist in the development of new types of air defense systems, the deliveries of which will be carried out in the near future,
told Rudskoy reporters.

The Ministry of Defense of Syria analyzed in detail the results of the reflection of a missile strike. On its basis, a number of changes have already been made to the country's air defense system, which will further increase its reliability, he added.

As the military expert, Colonel General Leonid Ivashov, noted, “portable Igla-type complexes, Pantsir short-range complexes, medium-range modernized Bukis, and C-300 long-range complexes can be supplied to Syria.”

According to him, it is obvious that Syria’s air defense system was decided to be strengthened and made layered.
Photos used:
Russian Ministry of Defense
154 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Logall
    Logall 10 May 2018 14: 43
    +33
    So far there are no such solutions.
    And why was it loud? Game to the public or show off?
    A good show is more expensive than money, but there are no show-offs to show off show-offs ...
    1. Alexander War
      Alexander War 10 May 2018 14: 50
      +6
      There was a concussion!
      1. Logall
        Logall 10 May 2018 14: 52
        +3
        Yeah, something had to be answered to the missile attacks of the ATS!
        A word against a rocket is a very dubious tactic ...
        I hope that they spend time teaching Syrian air defense students!
        1. Alexander War
          Alexander War 10 May 2018 14: 58
          +1
          Air defense all the more defensive system!
          1. Greg Miller
            Greg Miller 10 May 2018 15: 49
            +1
            The American missile defense also seems to be a defensive system .... The presence of the S-300 will allow Syria to control the airspace of Lebanon and Israel. The Jews do not like it ....
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. Alexander War
          Alexander War 10 May 2018 15: 02
          +2
          The S-300 will shoot at carriers if it is delivered The S-350 is still silence, if it were accepted, it would be shown at the Parade! To be honest, it would be nice if our Boom-M3 were set to test in combat conditions
        3. tomket
          tomket 10 May 2018 15: 54
          +1
          Quote: Logall
          I hope that they spend time teaching Syrian air defense students!

          Reaching that Syria will not, when they decide to deliver.
        4. san4es
          san4es 10 May 2018 16: 00
          +2
          Quote: Logall
          ... I hope that they spend time teaching Syrian air defense workers!

          Quote: Alexander War

          ... Air defense all the more defensive system!

          hi ... Sani is healthy ... drinks
          ... The causal relationship of the news is traced ... recourse :
          ... Ivashov ,: "..." portable systems of the Igla type, complexes of short-range cover "Shell", medium-range modernized Buki, and also long-range complexes S-300 can be delivered to Syria.
          According to him, it is obvious that Syria’s air defense system was decided to be strengthened and made layered.

          ... and earlier .... recourse
          ... speaks of an incident with an American pilot in the sky over Syria. The material says that the pilot of one of the two F / A-18E / F Super Hornet fighters, while performing a combat mission in the Syrian sky, informed the headquarters of the operation that he could not continue to participate in this operation due to a sharp deterioration in well-being.

          am ... They mow under the sick !! .. yes laughing
          1. Logall
            Logall 10 May 2018 16: 20
            +3
            Sanya, hi!
            Igla "- Russian and Soviet man-portable air defense missile system designed to destroy low flying air targets ...
            The needle is not that! Nobody flies low and close there ...
            1. san4es
              san4es 10 May 2018 16: 34
              +2
              laughing ... And where does it ... smile ... you did not catch up ... I'm talking about situevina as a whole (see comment above) yes :
              ... They mow under the sick !! ..
      2. Greg Miller
        Greg Miller 10 May 2018 15: 44
        +11
        If Assad, and not Netanyahu, were standing on Red Square next to Putin on May 9, the delivery of the S-300 to Syria would be possible. But after the parade, the answer is unequivocal - NO, Syria will not receive any S-300 !!!
    2. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 10 May 2018 14: 51
      +2
      It is possible that Jews and Americans are being tested for "weakly."
      1. Rey_ka
        Rey_ka 10 May 2018 15: 12
        +3
        Well, on the "weak" Netanyahu and flew to the parade !?
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 10 May 2018 15: 27
          +4
          Quote: Rey_ka
          Well, on the "weak" Netanyahu and flew to the parade !?

          Diarrhea, however .... Treat the need ...
      2. Ironclad
        Ironclad 10 May 2018 21: 59
        0
        The fastest way to customize your friends! Training! Deliveries of S-300! Beginning of an experiment to combat modern aircraft in America (alien aircraft in the war (poorly trained)) That's "weak"! Our board does not say about leaving the CCA!
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 10 May 2018 14: 52
      +6
      Quote: Logall
      And why was it loud? Game to the public or show off?

      That was a warning. Remember the status-6 scandal. In the year 15, there was a clear warning and the United States decided it was a bluff. As a result, Poseidon appeared.
      What is the purpose of the Russian Federation to be in Syria? To end the war faster and begin to restore it. This is our national interest. If this is hindered, then appropriate steps will be taken to counter this.
      1. Ased
        Ased 10 May 2018 15: 00
        +1
        How much we deliver and whether there will be any sense ...
        In a similar topic, we already thought about whom they CAN shoot.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 10 May 2018 15: 06
          +2
          Quote: ASed
          How much we deliver and whether there will be any sense ...

          The question is not even how much, but what kind of air defense systems we will deliver. I talked about the need for an early adoption of the S-350. But, in view of the new events with the introduction of US cruise missiles into our hands, I believe that plans for adopting the Vityazi will move taking into account the data obtained from the study. But besides Vityaz, there is a new modification of the TOP and the BEECH. I think it is these air defense systems, which have shown the greatest efficiency in a compartment with the Shell during the US missile strike and will be delivered to the Syrians. In favor of my arguments, it is that after a missile strike, 40 Shells were thrown very quickly into Syria.
          1. Logall
            Logall 10 May 2018 15: 22
            +3
            Quote: NEXUS
            which ones we’ll deliver. I talked about the need for an early adoption of the S-350

            The bottom line is that in the ATS it is planned to supply those complexes, the place of which will be occupied by the S-400 complexes. And producing specifically for Syria is very expensive!
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 10 May 2018 15: 25
              0
              Quote: Logall
              And producing specifically for Syria is very expensive!

              That is why I said about BUK and TOR, which are already in stock. And Vityaz will certainly first be supplied to its forces.
              1. Logall
                Logall 10 May 2018 15: 36
                +2
                BUKs and Torahs are more likely against attack aircraft and front-line bombers, rather than against multi-purpose fighters that hammer rockets without entering the range of operations listed above ... Just to hit rockets is inefficient, expensive! It is necessary to expand the area of ​​responsibility of air defense ... And the S-300 will look across the border with Israel.
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS 10 May 2018 15: 41
                  +2
                  Quote: Logall
                  BUKi and Torah - rather against attack aircraft and front-line bombers

                  No ... TORs have just a direct specialization-interception of the Kyrgyz Republic. Beeches are able to work both in the Kyrgyz Republic and in carriers from the middle distance. However, the shell is also imprisoned precisely for the interception of the Kyrgyz Republic.
                  1. Logall
                    Logall 10 May 2018 16: 12
                    +3
                    Exactly, I mixed up Thor with a cube ...
                    But you need not to shoot down missiles, but to repel the desire to launch them. And while they "naughty" with impunity, then their bloodthirstiness increases ...
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 10 May 2018 16: 41
                      +2
                      Quote: Logall
                      But you need not to shoot down missiles, but to repel the desire to launch them. And while they "naughty" with impunity, then their bloodthirstiness increases ...

                      For the time being, it is not profitable for us to aggravate the situation of interception and destruction of carriers. Yes, and Israel does not provoke us by striking from Lebanon.
                      As for the rocket attacks themselves ... well, practice gives a strong impetus to the speedy training of drugs for calculating air defense systems. Plus, trophy nishtyaks like those two CD mattresses should also not be forgotten.
                      By and large, we have no reason to quarrel with the Jews right now, because the war is coming to an end, which means that the main goal by which we in Syria will be fulfilled. But so that the sheep are safe and the wolves are full, it is the SAM BUK and the TOP that is the very way out for us to give the Syrians the opportunity to defend themselves, while not harming the Jews. If, however, Israel takes (for some reason) the entire side of the United States in this matter (which I doubt very much), then there will be a supply of S-300, moreover, immediately. Both Israel and the United States understand this.
                      Again, the supply of the S-300 can be on Israeli conditions, that is, so that our military, and not the Syrian, are behind the calculations of these systems. I think it is under such conditions that the S-300 is likely to be delivered to Syria.
                    2. Incvizitor
                      Incvizitor 10 May 2018 19: 36
                      0
                      discourage the desire to run them.

                      The Iranian “calibers” and “Iskanders” aimed at Israel would help, when, after the next act of Israeli aggression, they all land in the cities and the desire to kill decreases immediately.
            2. TermNachTer
              TermNachTer 10 May 2018 17: 12
              0
              And why not give the Syrians the 300s that are being removed from duty? If you can’t sell them.
              1. chingachguc
                chingachguc 11 May 2018 14: 57
                0
                because they are profound, and then we blush
                1. TermNachTer
                  TermNachTer 13 May 2018 10: 58
                  0
                  Well, all of them - there’s nowhere to put it. The resource ends. Capital to PMU - 2, as I understand it, are not going to. So why not give the Syrians? maybe they’ll overwhelm anyone?
          2. Alexander War
            Alexander War 10 May 2018 15: 29
            0
            Looks like a shell
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 10 May 2018 15: 32
              +3
              Quote: Alexander War
              Looks like a shell

              No ... it's a Hurricane and doesn't look like a Shell at all, from a word at all.
              1. Alexander War
                Alexander War 10 May 2018 20: 13
                +4
                Here is a video about the Shell ( sad
                1. Antidote
                  Antidote 10 May 2018 20: 32
                  +2
                  Smoking kills © Ministry of Health
                2. Ramzaj99
                  Ramzaj99 10 May 2018 21: 37
                  0
                  Israel like is always a victim and they are all attacked. And if you think about it, the opposite is true. The territories are being squeezed from Palestine every year more and more, they are trying in every possible way to wage war in Iran, they are trying to climb there themselves, so they are trying in every possible way to expose Iran to the blow of the Americans inciting at any opportunity. Syria, a sovereign state is periodically fired upon, destroyed by infrastructure and military personnel. In fact, they support the chaos created by the Americans throughout the region. Yes, and Georgia has not yet been forgotten. Russia asked not to supply the air defense to the Georgians, and no one was ignored because after all, they didn’t forget who armed and trained the Georgians, knowing perfectly where all this would fly)). Now they are asking Russia not to supply the s-300. In my opinion this is more than arrogance.
          3. Ased
            Ased 10 May 2018 15: 41
            +3
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: ASed
            How much we deliver and whether there will be any sense ...

            The question is not even how much, but what kind of air defense systems we will deliver. I talked about the need for an early adoption of the S-350. But, in view of the new events with the introduction of US cruise missiles into our hands, I believe that plans for adopting the Vityazi will move taking into account the data obtained from the study. But besides Vityaz, there is a new modification of the TOP and the BEECH. I think it is these air defense systems, which have shown the greatest efficiency in a compartment with the Shell during the US missile strike and will be delivered to the Syrians. In favor of my arguments, it is that after a missile strike, 40 Shells were thrown very quickly into Syria.


            Yes, even a laser. No one will shoot at NATO and US planes. Ccut !!!
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 10 May 2018 15: 44
              +7
              Quote: ASed
              Yes, even a laser. No one will shoot at NATO and US planes. Ccut !!!

              Stupidity is utter. It was clearly said, in the case,if our servicemen suffer, they will sink and bring down carriers. What is not clear to you here?
              1. Ased
                Ased 10 May 2018 15: 47
                +4
                Quote: NEXUS
                Quote: ASed
                Yes, even a laser. No one will shoot at NATO and US planes. Ccut !!!

                Stupidity is utter. It was clearly said, in the case,if our servicemen suffer, they will sink and bring down carriers. What is not clear to you here?


                Stupidity !!!
                ALREADY no one was suffering ????
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS 10 May 2018 15: 49
                  +4
                  Quote: ASed
                  ALREADY no one was suffering ????

                  Did the Russian military suffer from a missile strike?
              2. Ased
                Ased 10 May 2018 15: 50
                +4
                Quote: NEXUS
                Quote: ASed
                Yes, even a laser. No one will shoot at NATO and US planes. Ccut !!!

                Stupidity is utter. It was clearly said, in the case,if our servicemen suffer, they will sink and bring down carriers. What is not clear to you here?


                Although no, not stupidity - LIES !!!!
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS 10 May 2018 15: 52
                  +5
                  Quote: ASed
                  Although no, not stupidity - LIES !!!!

                  The facts that during the US missile strike on Syria, the Russian military suffered in the studio.
                  1. Ased
                    Ased 10 May 2018 15: 59
                    +3
                    And I’m not going to. Our people died there, our people were shot down, our people were bombed.
                    And where is the answer ???
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 10 May 2018 16: 01
                      +6
                      Quote: ASed
                      And not going to

                      Конечно. laughing Because there are no such facts, from the word at all. Accordingly, all your attempts, this is a meaningless gurgling and provocation.
                      1. Ased
                        Ased 10 May 2018 16: 08
                        +4
                        I have no one to provoke.

                        But to you - Hurray! You are a verbal hero.
                    2. Piramidon
                      Piramidon 10 May 2018 16: 34
                      +4
                      Quote: ASed
                      And I’m not going to. Our people died there, our people are shot down, our people are bombed.
                      And where is the answer ???

                      Where are the facts? You, like that of a rooster: "the main thing is to crow, and there at least do not dawn." Unsubstantiated, work for the public for the likes.
                      1. Ased
                        Ased 10 May 2018 17: 05
                        +3
                        Quote: Piramidon
                        Quote: ASed
                        And I’m not going to. Our people died there, our people are shot down, our people are bombed.
                        And where is the answer ???

                        Where are the facts? You, like that of a rooster: "the main thing is to crow, and there at least do not dawn." Unsubstantiated, work for the public for the likes.


                        You read and don’t like.
              3. spektr9
                spektr9 10 May 2018 17: 07
                +4
                It’s so good that I’m not a diplomat, I already imagined they were hitting Damascus, and you’re sitting there and thinking that if they hit me they’ll answer or, as usual, limit your concerns?
          4. dSK
            dSK 10 May 2018 15: 56
            +1
            Quote: NEXUS
            40 shells were thrown very quickly to Syria.

            They shot down half of Israel’s missiles.
            Russian specialists continue to train the Syrian military, and will also assist in the development of new types of air defense systems, the deliveries of which will be carried out in the near future, Rudskaya told reporters.
            It takes time to prepare the S-300 crews well. When attacking with 105 "axes", 8 (eight) S-200s were fired and not one hit the target, and this is not a cheap "pleasure". The calculations were probably "not finished."
            1. Leon68
              Leon68 10 May 2018 21: 14
              0
              Quote: dsk
              Quote: NEXUS
              40 shells were thrown very quickly to Syria.

              They shot down half of Israel’s missiles.
              Russian specialists continue to train the Syrian military, and will also assist in the development of new types of air defense systems, the deliveries of which will be carried out in the near future, Rudskaya told reporters.
              It takes time to prepare the S-300 crews well. When attacking 105 with axes 8 (eight) S-200s were released and not one hit the target, and this is not a cheap "pleasure"". The calculations were probably" not finished. "

              I think that they were pulled towards the Lancers, i.e. scared B-1B. Those were not completely bombed out with a fright that ZURs had gone in their direction and given a drape.
          5. Nikolaevich I
            Nikolaevich I 10 May 2018 16: 25
            +6
            Yes. The Buk’s could strengthen Syrian air defense. These air defense systems, I think, will be cheaper than the S-300 ... it will be possible to deliver more. By the way, both Israel and the United States are "implementing" the concept of air warfare that they adopted "weapons" at the end of the 20 century. The “main aspect” of this concept is the use by aviation of controlled (high-precision) weapons from a long distance (outside the enemy’s air defense area). This is where the anti-ballistic "air defense" function (and more specifically, the destruction of high-precision aviation weapons, although land-to-ground missiles should not be forgotten) comes first. And in this case, short-range and short-range air defense systems should be "soloists" . The task is “facilitated” to some extent by the fact that most RPM missiles do not maneuver in front of the target, the purpose of the missiles “meet” in order to determine the most probable directions, approach areas. The air defense task: to shoot down aircraft as far as possible from protected objects, departs , as it were, on the 2-th plan ... The task of shooting down missiles (bombs) is being brought to the forefront, which are aiming at targets like moths on fire ... Hence the conclusion, first of all, Syria doesn’t need C-300, but modern "Buki" and more air defense systems "Tor-M ...", "Shell-S1", "Sagittarius" But the maximum effect ivnost Syrian SAM short-range and short-range manifest when "close" interaction with the radar detection means, tracking Russian C-300, C-400 ...
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 10 May 2018 16: 31
              +1
              Quote: Nikolaevich I
              Hence the conclusion that, first of all, in Syria, it is not S-300 that is needed, but modern Buki, and more of the Tor-M ..., Pantsir-S1, Sagittarius air defense systems

              What I spoke about more than once before. hi
            2. SETTGF
              SETTGF 10 May 2018 17: 30
              0
              Nikolaevich I! You contradict yourself! About Buk complexes - they need almost 2,5 times more than the S-300, taking into account the coverage area of ​​Syria because of the range ... and even more so in the light of the latest use of short-range ballistic missiles - it can shoot down these missiles only S-300, S-400. And your justification regarding the Russian S-300, S-400 at the Khmeinim airbase and the sea in Tartus is, to put it mildly, ridiculous! This was shown by recent events - Russia is playing a double game, not offending Israel, which has become insolent! Thus, Russia does not protect the territory of Syria, but only the territory of its bases and no more!
              1. SETTGF
                SETTGF 10 May 2018 17: 43
                +1
                Nikolaevich I! You also forgot that for the destruction of early warning aircraft of the E-3A type, the AWACS system and jammers need S-400, S-300B4 ... which Syria does not have, S - 200 we do not take into account ...
                1. Nikolaevich I
                  Nikolaevich I 11 May 2018 02: 10
                  +2
                  Quote: SETTGF
                  forgot that for the destruction of early warning radars of the E-3A type, the AWACS system and jammers need C-400, C-300В4 ... which Syria does not have,

                  And what .... AWACS in that "district" -like flies in a rustic outhouse? What is only for their sake and supply C-300 / 400?
                  Quote: SETTGF
                  C - 200 is not taken into account.

                  And hello! The number of AWAXes that is is enough for C-200 .... with skillful use! And if you drop the missiles and carry out some modernization ...
              2. Nikolaevich I
                Nikolaevich I 11 May 2018 01: 53
                +2
                Quote: SETTGF
                You contradict yourself! About Buk complexes - they need almost 2,5 times more than C-300, taking into account the coverage area of ​​Syria because of the range ... and

                The apparent contradiction ... 1. C-300 need less? But a smaller number and it is easier to destroy ... (And Israel can and can do this ...); 2 ". C-300 has more radar coverage ..." Well, if you perfectly imagine the landscape of Syria, you are great! I can’t boast of this ... I suppose that the Syrian landscape contains "pits" and "tubercles that" level "the detection range of C-300 ... With the supplies of Bukov, the Syrian version is also possible: zuras and systems guidance "former", and launchers from "Buk-M3": 6 and 12- "charging" ....
                3.
                Quote: SETTGF
                the rationale for the Russian C-300, C-400 at the Khmeinim airbase and the sea in Tartus is, to put it mildly, ridiculous!

                M-d-ah! You master "blather" without serious justification! If only they would try to understand what I had in mind before pronouncing nonsense!
          6. SETTGF
            SETTGF 10 May 2018 16: 57
            0
            NEXUS! A lot of time is not needed to finalize the air defense systems ... Moreover, they showed themselves quite well during the NATO missile raid and were originally designed taking into account achievements in the field of rocket science!
            1. SETTGF
              SETTGF 10 May 2018 17: 08
              0
              And achievements in the field of ralolocation!
              1. SETTGF
                SETTGF 10 May 2018 17: 09
                0
                Oppiska - radar!
          7. Doronkabilio
            Doronkabilio 10 May 2018 21: 10
            +1



            With the shells that night somehow uncomfortable happened)))
            1. q75agent
              q75agent 10 May 2018 21: 34
              +2
              we see your joy, I hope that President Putin will finally understand who he is shaking hands with in Moscow and how the Israelis feel about Russia, well, no, reckoning will come, we will harness for a long time, but we will go fast, Schindler’s list am angry
              1. Doronkabilio
                Doronkabilio 10 May 2018 22: 52
                +1
                We are wonderful towards Russia. Poor attitude towards anti-Semites and the transfer of Russian weapons to our worst enemies
                1. q75agent
                  q75agent 10 May 2018 23: 06
                  +2
                  Well, of course, we see your attitude on stinging comments ...
                2. ultra
                  ultra 11 May 2018 15: 09
                  0
                  Quote: Doronkabilio
                  We are wonderful towards Russia. Poor attitude towards anti-Semites and the transfer of Russian weapons to our worst enemies

                  We are on the drum how you feel about us, and your "worst enemies" may well be our allies. Israel is a potentially hostile state for us, and we must dance from this.
          8. karish
            karish 10 May 2018 21: 16
            +4
            Quote: NEXUS
            In favor of my arguments, it is that after a missile strike, 40 Shells were thrown very quickly into Syria

            Well, apparently 39 laughing
            Although according to my data, they destroyed 4.
      2. Tiksi-3
        Tiksi-3 10 May 2018 15: 07
        +10
        Quote: NEXUS
        What is the purpose of the Russian Federation to be in Syria?

        Gazprom and Rosneft are two goals for staying in Syria
    4. venik
      venik 10 May 2018 15: 18
      +1
      Quote: Logall
      A good show is more expensive than money, but there are no show-offs to show off show-offs ...

      ========================
      And WELL WORSE, "Ponto" at the Forum!
      1. Logall
        Logall 10 May 2018 15: 25
        +5
        Quote: venik
        And WELL WORSE, "Ponto" at the Forum!

        Well, don’t get confused! A forum exists to express opinions, which I do with pleasure, short working hours.
        Mark better, better!
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 10 May 2018 15: 31
        +3
        The technical characteristics of the air defense systems \ systems are changing, and the means of attack are developing in the same way !!!
        Action is counteraction. Who is ahead, who behind will show only FIGHT!
        The most reliable air defense - missile defense so far is the destruction of the CARRIERS, the START positions of the attack!
        Does it exist in Syria? Someone can / should give them all \ to them? They can take preventive measures to prevent enemy missile and aircraft attacks ???
        Simple questions, and the answers to them, POSITIVE, IS?
        1. dauria
          dauria 10 May 2018 16: 13
          +6
          The most reliable air defense - missile defense so far is the destruction of the CARRIERS, the START positions of the attack!


          Give up. You put tactics above strategy. Nobody argues that just defense (air defense against missiles or aircraft) leads to defeat. But on the other hand, and simply aviation war will never win. Even a thousand cruise missiles with conventional warheads are just a thousand high explosives, nonsense for the troops. Is Syria’s strategy now to fight with Israel or the United States? Dominance in the air (no-fly zone) they were not allowed to create with the help of the Russian Federation. This is enough to gouge the ground enemy. This is Syria’s main goal for today. Yes, both the Jews and the states are impudent. But now you just need to clean up the territory and save the state. Therefore, such tolerance.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 10 May 2018 20: 13
            +5
            Assad’s entire strategy should lead to the same goal NOW, defeat the “barmaley” and begin to rebuild the country. It is wise not to engage in a butting with Israel, which Iran might push to. Better never, but certainly not NOW!
            Assad still has a lot of problems with the Kurds and the stripes that set them against him. With the Turks, identity is also not easy!
            PS To prove to me that the infantry won the war, the line troops, not necessarily ... I know!
            1. TermNachTer
              TermNachTer 13 May 2018 11: 02
              +1
              I agree completely and completely. Assad is fighting on credit. And it’s not difficult to guess who lends it. Although Russia has its own interest there.
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 13 May 2018 17: 37
                +3
                Credit is not a great problem. if you act appropriately.
                Assad has a bunch of other problems and their identity must be addressed adequately ... it will be difficult, very.
                1. TermNachTer
                  TermNachTer 13 May 2018 19: 42
                  0
                  Assad is a normal kid; he did not leave his country when the smell was fried. Unlike some others - prahvesessory.
    5. mr.fafes
      mr.fafes 10 May 2018 15: 22
      +6
      Well, it was necessary for V.V. to somehow respond to these attacks. And before the election, he could not say that he lay down under the Jews and handed everything over to them, they would not have understood, the rating would have fallen. And then announced the possible supply of C300 and sort of like, reacted! But the elections were over, now he can breathe a sigh of relief and continue to please the Jews.
      1. Ased
        Ased 10 May 2018 16: 45
        0
        Quote: mr.fafes
        Well, it was necessary for V.V. to somehow respond to these attacks. And before the election, he could not say that he lay down under the Jews and handed everything over to them, they would not have understood, the rating would have fallen. And then announced the possible supply of C300 and sort of like, reacted! But the elections were over, now he can breathe a sigh of relief and continue to please the Jews.


        So react.
        They tend to destroy.
        1. mr.fafes
          mr.fafes 11 May 2018 10: 09
          0
          Where do they react?
          Destroying! Who where? When? Can you link?
    6. sabakina
      sabakina 10 May 2018 15: 25
      +1
      Seryoga, the main thing is to intimidate the enemy before the battle, and there you will see. wink
      1. Ased
        Ased 10 May 2018 16: 23
        0
        Quote: sabakina
        Seryoga, the main thing is to intimidate the enemy before the battle, and there you can see
        will be. wink


        Intimidation is good!
        Have NATO or US aircraft been shot down on BV?
        Type - boo !!! Very scary.
    7. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 10 May 2018 17: 47
      +2
      Quote: Logall
      So far there are no such solutions.
      And why was it loud? Game to the public or show off?
      A good show is more expensive than money, but there are no show-offs to show off show-offs ...

      Mattresses were also placed on the Javelins by the Ukrins, and then banned from their use against LDNR. Maybe here the question hangs somewhere between such concepts as "hang out" and "bargain"?
    8. The comment was deleted.
      1. q75agent
        q75agent 10 May 2018 18: 47
        0
        well, let your words be voiced by your prime minister, and we will think 100 times, because you can also deceive
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. q75agent
            q75agent 10 May 2018 20: 03
            0
            time will tell .... today we have a special issue of Soloviev’s program on this topic at 21 wink
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. ultra
        ultra 11 May 2018 15: 13
        0
        Quote: dvcrfvfb
        Russia Israel friend Iran rival you

        With what fright did Russia and Israel become friends? Iran is our opponent in what place?
        1. TermNachTer
          TermNachTer 13 May 2018 11: 04
          0
          Russia does not have constant friends and constant enemies, but has permanent interests. I'm talking about India, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, etc. Why not make friends with the Jews, if it is still profitable?
    9. Scoun
      Scoun 10 May 2018 22: 57
      +1
      Quote: Logall
      And why was it loud? Game to the public or show off?

      I understand.
      And who is it?!

      said Fomin, answering the question

      VO is something.
      @@@@####about! Any @@@@ ## will now have this character set as appeals and wisdom.
      So here ..... what and who spoke out?
      PS ...
      Syrians at least 1 Shell "just # rally", but this is not "ju-ju", air defense should be comprehensive.
  2. 210ox
    210ox 10 May 2018 14: 45
    +4
    They will see. On May XNUMX, in Moscow, Netanyahu stomped around for a reason.
    1. Moskovit
      Moskovit 10 May 2018 14: 46
      +6
      Useless then. The war between Iran and Israel flares up more and more. Russia is unlikely to be able to sit on four chairs.
      1. Dam
        Dam 10 May 2018 15: 32
        +1
        And it is beneficial for us in any development
    2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 10 May 2018 14: 46
    +6
    Okay, wait and see.
    1. vladfill
      vladfill 10 May 2018 14: 52
      +3
      Calm down, the current ones either favor you or cajole before you, they’re about
      in a situation where they are strangers to us.
      1. Гандурас
        Гандурас 10 May 2018 16: 26
        +2
        vladfill ↑
        Today, 14: 52
        Calm down, the current ones either favor you or cajole before you, they’re about
        in a situation where they are strangers to us.

        Say it bluntly: “afraid”
        1. ultra
          ultra 11 May 2018 15: 14
          0
          The movie is crap, like the book though.
    2. Ased
      Ased 10 May 2018 15: 07
      +3
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      Okay, wait and see.


      I think this comment deserves the "Divine Oscar of the Millennium."
      For a fact.
  4. Loess
    Loess 10 May 2018 14: 46
    +7
    Syria, fortunately, is not under sanctions,
    Are we still concerned about anybody’s sanctions there ??? We have our own interests and other people's sanctions here should not play a role.
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 10 May 2018 14: 55
      +2
      Quote: Less
      We have our own interests and other people's sanctions here should not play a role.

      It can turn out like in the former Yugoslavia!
    2. Leon68
      Leon68 10 May 2018 21: 26
      0
      Quote: Less
      Syria, fortunately, is not under sanctions,
      Are we still concerned about anybody’s sanctions there ??? We have our own interests and other people's sanctions here should not play a role.

      By sanctions, it means UN.
  5. vladfill
    vladfill 10 May 2018 14: 49
    +6
    Medvedev did not deliver and Putin does not deliver.
    1. Antidote
      Antidote 10 May 2018 15: 41
      +2
      Medvedev did not deliver to Iran, Putin did. But here the snot chew, definitely.
  6. ASG7
    ASG7 10 May 2018 14: 53
    +3
    Jews must be fought in Hebrew. If they hit the territory of Syria for shelling the Golan Heights, then they must be answered along the territory of Israel, and not according to the heights, the only way they can be stopped.
    1. farcop
      farcop 10 May 2018 14: 56
      +2
      Quote: ASG7
      answer must be on the territory of Israel
      Someone tried it yesterday. Are you by any chance?
      1. ASG7
        ASG7 10 May 2018 14: 59
        +2
        I would love to strike at the terrorist training base and their control centers in Israel, but alas, there is no such possibility. And the civilian population does not need to be dragged in, I really love the Jews.
        1. farcop
          farcop 10 May 2018 15: 07
          +4
          Quote: ASG7
          I would love to strike
          And they are not there
          Quote: ASG7
          I love Jews very much.
          The motto of anti-Semites of all times and stripes
          1. ASG7
            ASG7 10 May 2018 15: 17
            +4
            Quote: farcop
            And they are not there

            And angels probably launched rockets across Syria.
            Quote: farcop
            The motto of anti-Semites of all times and stripes

            Well, you better know this, but we don’t know.
            1. farcop
              farcop 10 May 2018 15: 38
              0
              Quote: ASG7
              missiles in Syria, the angels probably launched.
              Who started it, I don’t know, it’s clear that those for whom the roofing felts launched the roofing angels, but they will give greetings only from the other world.
              Quote: ASG7
              it is unknown to us

              Well, that’s already known.
              1. ASG7
                ASG7 10 May 2018 15: 49
                +1
                Quote: farcop
                Who launched I do not know

                Well, when you find out, then we'll talk about who you need to bomb.
                Quote: farcop
                Well, that’s already known.

                Do not pass off your ignorance as truth.
            2. 22 dmdc
              22 dmdc 10 May 2018 16: 42
              0
              And the Zionists launched missiles in Syria.
      2. Double major
        Double major 10 May 2018 15: 17
        +7
        Yesterday they answered not in Israel, but in the occupied territories. And it’s necessary to hit Israel itself. Up to the resort areas. To get it. Otherwise, stupid people do not understand. Bibi brought a specialist to the parade - to show what he was running into, and he immediately crashed into Syria. It does not reach over the head. It's time to finish through the ass.
  7. Eduard petrov
    Eduard petrov 10 May 2018 14: 55
    +3
    So far there are no such solutions. If they are accepted, why not. Syria, fortunately, is not under sanctions

    Everything, just not to anger the Western partners ...))
  8. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 10 May 2018 14: 59
    +8
    Well delivered, well placed, then what? Like everything, the sky is locked? Yes, as everyone flies, they will fly. Our rulers don’t have enough spirit to give an order to grind on the most possible airplanes, they are rulers we have manual
  9. Vol4ara
    Vol4ara 10 May 2018 15: 03
    +2
    It sounds something like "the Russian Federation can put nuclear weapons in Angola, but no decision has yet been made." I can give my house to my neighbor for that, but I haven’t made a decision yet
  10. Placebo
    Placebo 10 May 2018 15: 04
    +5
    We don’t have an S-300, we sold everything ... And there are no components, devastation ... We would have been there long ago ... Sellers of the Motherland on ...
    1. Rey_ka
      Rey_ka 10 May 2018 15: 14
      +2
      Yes, and the companies that do this are allowed for scrap!
  11. Dr. Sorge
    Dr. Sorge 10 May 2018 15: 06
    +1
    Since 2005, it may be slurred, then they don’t need them, then this or that. Apparently someone else’s childish dignitaries gathered to study ....
  12. Double major
    Double major 10 May 2018 15: 12
    +1
    Either deliver, or shoot down American and Israeli missiles themselves, which is not particularly desirable, the third world smells ... Otherwise, we’ll lose not only this region - who needs friends who fail in a difficult moment. We have no one left there except Syria ...
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. flicker
    flicker 10 May 2018 15: 15
    +3
    While there are no such solutions. If they are accepted, why not. Syria, fortunately, is not under sanctions,
    At the beginning, we will deploy the S-300 in Syria, and only then we will decide on its delivery - this sequence looks more reasonable.
  15. Rey_ka
    Rey_ka 10 May 2018 15: 16
    0
    yes lan that everyone on the S-300 rested if that the Chinese fuss and sell their copies! well, and if there is something knocking down so PR is excellent! By the way, I suggest letting the fallen Tomogawks give them to the Chinese let them copy!
    1. danan
      danan 10 May 2018 15: 45
      +1
      Rey_ka As we think and say: the Russians say "put" (they know that Assad has no money, that is, thank you) and the Chinese will "sell." The Chinese will not give up for nothing, agree? Now imagine the Chinese sold and Israel destroyed them. This will be anti-PR! Refusal of orders. Shadow on growing weapons. Maybe they think about it at the top?
      1. ultra
        ultra 11 May 2018 15: 17
        +1
        Quote: danan
        Russians say "put" (they know that Assad has no money, i.e. thank you)

        Early versions of the C300 will be delivered, which are being removed from combat duty.
        1. danan
          danan 13 May 2018 09: 17
          0
          Mikhail, I am glad that the GDP made a wise decision. Moreover, Israel’s actions met and are in the highest national interests of Russia: the price of oil doubled in a couple of months, the budget grew trillion rubles, which should help the people survive the consequences of the sanctions.
  16. Runoway
    Runoway 10 May 2018 15: 17
    +4
    Blah blah blah! Already the sky over Syria was closed to everyone except the Russian Federation and the SAR repeat
    Quote: Twice Major
    Otherwise, we will lose not only this region - who needs friends who fail in a difficult moment. We have no one left there except Syria ...

    Which region ???? You mean Khmemim and Tartus, but they won’t be bombed unless drones are counted? Except for these bases, the rest of the territory is FREE POLYGON with free access
    About what Syrians friends we will find out right away how everything is, God forbid, it will work out. But I’m afraid the same friends will be like all the rest, the peoples saved by the Russian soldier, in the history of many
  17. dojjdik
    dojjdik 10 May 2018 15: 18
    0
    here the current is one answer - it is necessary to answer all the more so the Syrians have twinkles that you can hang on and not very old missiles and we have submarines that we can give or sell diesel of course Assad is not expensive, so it’s not air defense, although it’s also not bad; and the Chinese have something yes, they can also give Assad
  18. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 10 May 2018 15: 18
    0
    “So far there are no such decisions. If they are adopted, why not. Syria, fortunately, is not under sanctions,”

    OK, so ...
    It turns out that we must pray that these sanctions are not imposed ???
    And if the Yankees issue a decree so that this gentleman kills against the wall, will he go and kill ???
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. sabakina
    sabakina 10 May 2018 15: 23
    +4
    There is a S-300 in Syria, there is no S-300 in Syria, this is unknown to science! drinks
  21. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 10 May 2018 15: 27
    0
    RF, if it will supply, then the S-300 complexes (different versions) removed from service. . And then, as we replace them with the S-400. The most for the Syrians is Buk-2M and Armor and radar (for more complete control of the airspace). On the S-300/400, more staff to learn about a year.
  22. rocket757
    rocket757 10 May 2018 15: 39
    +5
    Ours came to the aid of the people, the legitimate government of Syria, in the fight against the "barmaley"!
    A country, independent Syria will be! “Barmaleevs” will finish off slowly ... of course, the world will certainly not be there for a long time, and will NOW a showdown with a neighbor be necessary, albeit harmful but quite adequate ??? But do we need this old and certainly not our squabble ???
    Need PEACE and need to negotiate!
    1. spektr9
      spektr9 10 May 2018 17: 17
      +3
      True, I thought that our people came there to prevent the establishment of a pro-American regime, to prevent the UAE-Europe oil pipeline from stretching through Syria, and leave their bases ...
      If the current regime in Syria is not supported, then all this down the drain
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 10 May 2018 20: 22
        +3
        Obvious, unbelievable!
        How many goals were set there and tasks were carried out, for example, no one reported to me!
        But assumptions, fantasies, plans cannot be attached to business!
        There are stated, officially declared goals and objectives! This is a fact that cannot be completely dismissed.
        1. spektr9
          spektr9 10 May 2018 22: 49
          0
          A lot of exclamation points comrade, well, too ...
          As for fantasies, you are undoubtedly right, and the main fantasy here is that the peace in Syria can be knocked out by negotiating, but as the practice of relations between people, tribes, cities and powers shows, weak with strong, no matter how much is underdone and does not make concessions, this does not lead to peace
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 11 May 2018 08: 23
            +3
            In the east, they always tried to negotiate from a position of strength, that's understandable.
            Inside the country, the territory of the Syrian army, the power is the strongest! So you need to use this.
            The Kurds have striped support, the Turks themselves are strong, and Israel is generally outside the field of active hostilities! This sales is not the second question will be, I do not know which ... we can later.
            Syria needs PEACE, the country needs to be restored.
  23. Strips
    Strips 10 May 2018 15: 43
    +7
    however, the decision on the supply has not yet been made


  24. Dr. Sorge
    Dr. Sorge 10 May 2018 16: 27
    +4
    My forecast - they will not deliver. I wrote it, let's see through time :)
  25. Enoch
    Enoch 10 May 2018 16: 28
    +1
    Will not be:

    "On May 9, 2018, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, invited to celebrations of the 73rd anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, will hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. The heads of state intend to discuss the situation in the Middle East, in particular, to strengthen their positions Iran in Syria.
    More on TASS:
    http://tass.ru/info/5186833"
  26. Corporal Pupkin
    Corporal Pupkin 10 May 2018 16: 35
    +5
    oh, that’s Putin’s "spy" matrimony!
    EXPENSELY it costs Russia ....
  27. Ivan Tarava
    Ivan Tarava 10 May 2018 16: 53
    0
    Well, there’s still a “provocation”, then we’ll think about delivering it again or not.
  28. samarin1969
    samarin1969 10 May 2018 17: 02
    0
    If for a good prepayment - then you can. And "for so", it makes no sense. Against a swarm of "partners" is a drop in the ocean.
  29. q75agent
    q75agent 10 May 2018 17: 24
    +1
    An interesting video, but it’s not clear whether the Syrians are Jewish, or vice versa
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 11 May 2018 00: 12
      +1
      Quote: q75agent
      An interesting video, but it’s not clear whether the Syrians are Jewish, or vice versa

      Come to Israel to relax, it will be fun ..... laughing
  30. Yak28
    Yak28 10 May 2018 18: 11
    +1
    Quote: danan
    Russians say "put" (they know that Assad has no money, i.e. thank you)

    Well, we are communists in our hearts, (despite the capitalists and the bourgeoisie) and therefore we will give for free wink
  31. Wolka
    Wolka 10 May 2018 18: 27
    +1
    What are we doing in Syria ....? Well, yes, we are helping the fraternal people of Syria to repulse the imperialist aggression of the West ... prove the opposite
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. Old26
    Old26 10 May 2018 19: 34
    +2
    Quote: ASG7
    Jews must be fought in Hebrew. If they hit the territory of Syria for shelling the Golan Heights, then they must be answered along the territory of Israel, and not according to the heights, the only way they can be stopped.

    Assad now only lacks a full-scale war with Israel. He has already turned all opposition to the fingernail, probably, turned all the barmaley into forcemeat. Now it remains only to deal with Israel. The war with Israel for Syria is now the same as taking and returning to the events of 4-5 years ago, when all this mess in Syria was just unfolding. In addition to a pair of fronts, to arrange one more thing - and what if in Syria it is necessary to put an end to - this is the way out
  34. Strips
    Strips 10 May 2018 20: 15
    +1
    Israeli Army showed video of the destruction of SA-22 - Shell-C1

    There is a video on the link:


    Interesting article on Ynet website:
    https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5256713,
    00.html
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 10 May 2018 21: 58
      +1
      Quote: Tiras
      Israeli Army showed video of the destruction of SA-22 - Shell-C1

      There is a video on the link:


      Interesting article on Ynet website:
      https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5256713,
      00.html

      There was nobody there, the crew smoked aside ..... laughing
    2. ultra
      ultra 11 May 2018 15: 19
      0
      Quote: Tiras
      Israeli Army showed video of the destruction of SA-22 - Shell-C1

      Look do not describe yourself with joy! laughing
  35. Doliva63
    Doliva63 10 May 2018 20: 41
    +3
    Who praised the Shell? They say -1. sad Air defense should be sooo layered, including air defense air defense.
    1. chingachguc
      chingachguc 11 May 2018 14: 51
      0
      I praised and continue to praise. If the calculation catches a raven instead of rockets, then the technique is not to blame
  36. Azis
    Azis 10 May 2018 20: 47
    0
    Quote: ASG7
    I love Jews very much.

    Jews, or rather?
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 11 May 2018 00: 08
      +1
      Quote: Azis
      Quote: ASG7
      I love Jews very much.

      Jews, or rather?

      Who knows who knows.... laughing
  37. prosto_rgb
    prosto_rgb 10 May 2018 21: 07
    +1
    and the meaning?
    that would be like this:
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 11 May 2018 00: 10
      +1
      Quote: prosto_rgb
      and the meaning?
      that would be like this:

      Someone ran to the car, I saw a rocket, but what was the point of running .... belay
      1. prosto_rgb
        prosto_rgb 11 May 2018 15: 39
        +1
        doubtful that noticed
        otherwise you should have run the other way
  38. Azis
    Azis 10 May 2018 21: 34
    +2
    Quote: dvcrfvfb
    Russia Israel friend Iran rival us enemy

    "Execution cannot be pardoned." You must correctly place the commas. And in this case, words along with commas. Israel has never been a friend of Russia. He was and is a friend of some people from Russia, but are these people friends of Russia? I do not consider the short-sighted people in the USSR who had power and the ability to support the Arabs with weapons and advisers in the 60-70s. The islanders fostered all this muin with Israel under their mandate in Palestine since 1922 in order to plant awl in Arabs with their control of Suez after the loss of their colonies. As for Iran - Iran, unlike other littoral states, also friends of Russia, sawing the shelf, does not particularly seek to revise the status of the Caspian under the treaties of the 21st and 40th years. And direct trade with Iran in the Caspian is important for Russia, it’s better than with other Caspian states, which de facto become intermediaries in the sale of Russian goods to Iran. Moreover, are Shiites not part of the containment of Salafi, where do Wahi, Yi, etc. come from?
  39. q75agent
    q75agent 10 May 2018 21: 44
    +2
    Quote: Doronkabilio
    With the shells that night somehow uncomfortable happened)))

    and with f-16, also 10 .02 .2018)))
  40. XXXIII
    XXXIII 10 May 2018 21: 54
    +1
    "Portable systems of the Igla type, complexes of close cover" Shell ", medium range - modernized Buki, as well as long-range complexes S-300."
    So like "Shell", "Buki" delivered or not?! .... lol
  41. Totah155
    Totah155 10 May 2018 22: 49
    +1
    How so ?
    For a long time, many speakers on topvar hit their heels in the chest, proving that the C300 is already in Syria and is waiting for our valiant Air Force at every intersection.
    What now should poor Bashar and orator be doing?
  42. jonht
    jonht 11 May 2018 00: 21
    0
    Do not worry, they will train specialists on the S-300, and the systems themselves will be delivered. At the moment, our task is not to be greater Syrians than the Syrians themselves. And the loss of sloppiness of installations for Middle Eastern warriors is also unfortunately the norm.
    Well, for those who do not believe, it is useless to prove something.
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. Lynx33
    Lynx33 11 May 2018 07: 51
    +1
    It’s necessary to put inflatable boats from the beginning, and to send fighters with MANPADS to favorable positions for firing air-to-ground missiles, let them land a couple of Jewish flyers, maybe the fervor will cool off.
  45. chingachguc
    chingachguc 11 May 2018 14: 48
    0
    To supply the S-300 to the Syrians is to cast a shadow on the good name of the developers. For the Arabs, whatever they give them, even the Death Star - they all scam, and they will also blame us. "Shell" is not enough for you?
  46. manne mann
    manne mann 13 May 2018 15: 18
    0
    Netanyahu did not allow the campaign! You already begin to doubt when you see that the so-called Israel gets up in Syria, supporting thugs, and our president, as if not noticing and not reacting or not allowing to react!