Husites knocked out Abrams tank in Saudi Arabia

35
Representatives of the armed Hussite formations destroyed the tank of Saudi troops in Saudi territory. According to the Huthit command, the Abrams tank was located a few hundred meters from the territory of Yemen and was ready to fire. As a result, the Hussites were the first to fire, and the Abrams, who was in the province of Jizan (Saudi Arabia), was destroyed by an anti-tank missile system.





The command of the armed forces of Saudi Arabia reports that the shelling by the Houthis led to the death of the 4's soldiers. Also added that two more people were injured and were taken to the nearest hospital.

This is far from the first loss tank "Abrams" by the armed forces of Saudi Arabia. However, before this attack on the armored vehicles of the kingdom, most often were carried out on the territory of Yemen, which is occupied by the Saudi army. Recently, the Hussites have stepped up shelling of Saudi territory, using ballistic missiles. Not so long ago, several such missiles were attacked by Riyadh, and then Patriot air defense systems worked, to put it mildly, not in the best way for the Saudis.
  • Facebook AMN
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    3 May 2018
    And the Saudis also want to Syria ... they would regret their wives and mothers, as they would live without men.
    1. +5
      3 May 2018
      It is not customary to ask women there, and those who decide it themselves will not climb into the trenches. To do this, there are a bunch of migrants who can be put under arms.
      1. +5
        3 May 2018
        Warriors from Arabs ... Like a bullet from recyclables. They that the USSR gave tanks-burned that the United States. The main thing in the tank is the crew.
        1. +2
          3 May 2018
          Quote: Serge Gorely
          Warriors from Arabs ... Like a bullet from recyclables.

          Arabs know how to fight, but do not know how to fight (Lawrence of Arabia). True, Lawrence did not even try to plant Arabs on tanks. laughing
    2. Maz
      +4
      3 May 2018
      Burns, burns striped
    3. 0
      3 May 2018
      "Abrams", located in the province of Jizan (Saudi Arabia), was destroyed by ATGM.

      I wonder what kind of ATGM ...
      1. +4
        3 May 2018
        From the Metis family, most likely. Their Hussites often use, and the tracer on the video is characteristic ...
        1. +1
          3 May 2018
          I thought about the same thing, now there is even less doubt. Yes
          1. +1
            3 May 2018
            Pasha, where did you see the video? If the one below is another abrams. 2015 year.
            1. +1
              3 May 2018
              So, I burst it: I on this video also wondered. feel
              1. +1
                3 May 2018
                Damn, I, too ... thought. I just looked at what the Hussites constantly indulge in Jizan. And by inertia interpolated ..
                https://vk.com/video-118971321_456240045
                1. +1
                  3 May 2018
                  This is called wishful thinking ... lol
  2. +1
    3 May 2018
    well done! you have to beat the enemy on its territory ...
  3. +7
    3 May 2018
    Husites knocked out the Abrams tank

    fellow what a news! knocked out "abrashu"!
    neither he is the first nor he is the last.


    there would be a desire and skills ...
  4. +7
    3 May 2018
    The Saudis are lounging on the sly despite their equipment with modern types of weapons. In this war, it is clearly visible that the fighter with the "core inside" is stronger than any full-armed soldier.
    1. +5
      3 May 2018
      Quote: rotmistr60
      In this war, it is clearly visible that the fighter with the "core inside" is stronger than any full-armed soldier.

      In addition to the "core inside" the fighter and weapons need the appropriate. One "core" "abrams" can’t be matched ...
  5. +4
    3 May 2018
    One more confirmation about Abrams’s lack of spirit ....
  6. Wei
    +6
    3 May 2018
    Soon, it will come to the vaunted "mercenaries" ..! The good news is you can beat them all ..
  7. 0
    3 May 2018
    Saudis, and even on Abrams, again absolute confidence in their inaccessibility !!! But no, as it turned out, and the crew was not prepared, and the automation failed. Everything is as it is, without embellishment.
  8. +2
    3 May 2018
    You can kill this tank skillfully from a heavy machine gun ... and God himself ordered a rocket ...
    1. +1
      3 May 2018
      Quote: Vard
      You can kill this tank skillfully from a heavy machine gun ...

      EMNIP, only the earlier versions - in later versions of the APU, they were nevertheless removed from the aft of the tower.
  9. +3
    3 May 2018
    Recently, the Hussites have stepped up shelling of Saudi territory, using ballistic missiles. Not so long ago, several such missiles were attacked by Riyadh, and then SAM Patriot worked, to put it mildly, not the best way for the Saudis.
    This is very mildly said, but roughly speaking, they worked x (peak, peak). Now, their calculations and the people around me, before each launch, they will pray for the “glorified” mattress weapon not to spread into the trash both the launcher itself and all the sheds nearby. belay
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +4
    3 May 2018
    Work, brothers!
  12. 0
    3 May 2018
    In general, the Anglo-Saxons do not know how to make tank weapons .. Here are the AUG and the “axes” so that they can’t fight from far away!
    1. mvg
      0
      3 May 2018
      Come on, how then did the Centurions and Shermans “lower” the T-55, IS-3 and T-62, and the Merkava, Challengers and Abrams T-62 and T-72 of the Republican Guard and the Chinese Type-69. They don’t know how at all.
    2. +1
      3 May 2018
      Quote: Kaskad
      In general, the Anglo-Saxons do not know how to make tank weapons ..

      Ahem ... the slippery topic of determining the effectiveness of weapons based on their use by the Arabs is better not to raise. And then with such a technique it turns out that the USSR did not know how to make weapons at all - relying on the results of all the Arab-Israeli wars and Desert Storm. wink
  13. +1
    3 May 2018
    Interestingly: is the Negro loader included in the kit, but is it included in the Arab Abrams or not? what
  14. LMN
    +3
    3 May 2018
    I don’t want to "kick", but if in Ukraine kneading starts, how it will be ours against Jewels. They are not delivered there for the sake of raising morale. what
    1. 0
      3 May 2018
      Javelin is not delivered to Ukraine to raise morale. This is a really dangerous weapon. In truth, Stugna and I are pretty good, but I didn’t shoot, I forgot. The bad thing is that the US oligarchs stand and make pennies on this ....
      1. LMN
        +3
        3 May 2018
        Shot - forgot. Is it like in the US Air Force?
        Time will tell smile
        Regarding Stugna .. is it a product of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine? Doesn’t inspire confidence, sorry hi
        1. 0
          3 May 2018
          Stugna together with Belarus development (project HIERARDS). It was adopted even during the bloody regime of Yanukovych in the amount of 10 pieces (launchers). In 79 airmobile brigade. The use was and continues in the Donbass war. System at the Cornet level. Do not underestimate the military-industrial complex of Ukraine - with proper funding, projects go into series. For example, electronic warfare systems - ANKLAV2 - at least.
      2. mvg
        +1
        3 May 2018
        We (and you) do not have 3rd generation ATGMs "shot-forgot", such a miracle is possessed by Jews, the USA, China and, more recently, India (with the participation of Israel)
  15. +1
    3 May 2018
    Americans haven’t said it was an accidental hit? recourse
  16. +1
    3 May 2018
    Well, they destroyed an unkillable, boiled tank! Burn a striped piece of iron from mattresses hi and how will they fight in Syria? the borders will not go further.
  17. 0
    3 May 2018
    Abrams, democratic Abrams !!!!, I would even say liberal democratic Abrams, privatized, and creatively constructed, knocked out by some kind of cultural identity ATGM? I don’t believe my eyes. Apparently the monarchist Arabs screwed up, the only explanation.
  18. 0
    3 May 2018
    And how could these Hussites dare? To knock out the best tank of the millennium and, I suppose, a sandal from a slingshot? No respect at all

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"