Military Review

NI: Russian Su-27 terrifies NATO countries

62
American magazine The National Interest is a new article about Russian weapons. A new article was devoted to the aircraft still of the Soviet "origin" - Su-27. Probably, the material was inspired by the author’s statements by the Pentagon’s representatives that the Su-27 pilot made an “unprofessional” interception of the American P-8 “Poseidon” over the Baltic Sea. Recall that in the US military on the eve of the spread message about the approach of the Russian fighter to the US plane on 6 m.




The author of the material (Robert Fairlie) states that the Su-27 aircraft "terrify the NATO countries." According to the author of the material, these fighters are "frightening". At the same time, there is a list of conflicts in which these aircraft were used at different times: “Russia with Ukraine”, Ethiopia with Eritrea, Vietnam with China.

As the author of the material in NI characterizes Su-27? From the article:
In the West, accustomed to the fact that most of the legendary Soviet aircraft of the Cold War came from the design offices of Mikoyan and Gurevich, which resulted in the production of such aircraft as the MiG-15 "Fagot", MiG-21 "Fishbed", "MiG-25" Foxbat "And MiG-29" Fulcrum ". The only best Soviet fighter of the Cold War, however, was the Su-27 Sukhoi Flanker. Designed both to defeat American fighters in Central Europe in the conflict of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, and to patrol the airspace of the Soviet Union against the invasions of American bombers, Su-27 survived the end of the Cold War to become one of the world's leading export fighters.
Photos used:
svo.spb.ru
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Click
    Click 3 May 2018 05: 48
    +4
    And all request ... request . request
    1. Do not care
      Do not care 3 May 2018 05: 49
      +2
      Just horror
    2. Vard
      Vard 3 May 2018 05: 51
      +12
      And what did you want ... all the horror stories end just like that ... But seriously, a very successful plane, with great potential ... it will spoil the digestion of Western pilots more than once ...
      1. A good one
        A good one 3 May 2018 06: 03
        +5
        So horror, someone was horrified and everything is behind him. We are not horrified, there is a goal, which means we will be beaten if necessary.
      2. Bo Yari
        Bo Yari 3 May 2018 06: 09
        +4
        the plane is successful ... 80s ... and now what year?
        1. Cxnumx
          Cxnumx 3 May 2018 06: 54
          +7
          Quote: Bo Yariy
          the plane is successful ... 80s ... and now what year?

          even in the USA (which invest several times more in aviation), 70-80 aircraft still fly.
      3. NEXUS
        NEXUS 3 May 2018 11: 43
        +1
        Quote: Vard
        And what did you want ... all the horror stories end just like that ..

        The article is custom-made and is aimed at the fact that the Russian Federation is an enemy. But you know, I began to wonder - and with what hangover, say, some ice cream seller in the USA, or a chimney sweep living in France is my enemy? These people did not see me in the eye, just as I did them, but someone decided that we simply must hate each other and, moreover, fight.
        And then another question arises, will there be a war? And I have no doubt what will happen, as there were many wars in the past.
        1. Bo Yari
          Bo Yari 3 May 2018 13: 19
          +1
          and Ukrainians who hated?
  2. cedar
    cedar 3 May 2018 05: 52
    +11
    Su-27 is a wonderful aircraft, wonderful Sukhoi Design Bureau.
    God forbid that his younger brother Su-57 in a considerable number and with even greater benefit would serve Russia.
  3. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 3 May 2018 05: 54
    +4
    Let the adversaries be afraid! So many years in service! In 1988 the first flight.
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 3 May 2018 05: 55
    +11
    NI: Russian Su-27 terrifies NATO countries


    Kindergarten and not the headline smile perhaps this is done in order to properly scare the layman who later voted for an increase in military spending in his country.
    For normal analytics, such headlines are all rubbish and do not say anything.
    1. Bo Yari
      Bo Yari 3 May 2018 06: 08
      +2
      agree laughing totally agree
    2. YELLOWSTONE
      YELLOWSTONE 3 May 2018 09: 28
      0
      the fact that he is one of the best export of course everyone missed lol
  5. agribkov79
    agribkov79 3 May 2018 05: 59
    +8
    And we can only bring horror. Then on the head, then in Syria, then where else we get ... # horror-guides ... There, A. Kuznetsov brought horror! They all smoked. disgrace. Whom are we protecting? snickering Putin's friends? Or Russian poverty? And what about the terrible # of them? Ugh, damn it, disgusting.
    Remove, ban.
    1. A good one
      A good one 3 May 2018 06: 06
      +9
      For what? Good comment. A medal on your chest, or maybe an order on your back.
      1. kirgiz58
        kirgiz58 3 May 2018 06: 16
        +6
        Quote: Not bad
        For what? Good comment. A medal on your chest, or maybe an order on your back.

        Nah! Only an order, ...... but with a twist on the back. smile
    2. Bo Yari
      Bo Yari 3 May 2018 06: 07
      +2
      wink I agree with you, here you are right
      1. Mestny
        Mestny 3 May 2018 09: 38
        0
        Where do you climb all the time?
        However, it is clear where.
    3. Same lech
      Same lech 3 May 2018 06: 14
      +1
      There, A. Kuznetsov brought horror! They all smoked. disgrace. Whom are we protecting? snickering Putin's friends?


      Ay ah ah ... what are you so emotionally smile
      pent up what understand .
      But you didn’t fully reveal the topic ... you probably didn’t yet say that our aircraft carrier cruiser is going to be put up for repairs and repairs will cost more than ten billion rubles (I think it’s easier to build a new modern aircraft carrier) ... expose your arguments and you will be happy.
      An article about the repair of this ship.
      https://ria.ru/defense_safety/20170422/1492866562
      .html
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack 3 May 2018 06: 21
        +4
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        our aircraft carrier cruiser is planned to be put in for repair and this repair will cost more than a dozen billion rubles

        Wrecking, no way? belay
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        I think it's easier to build a new modern aircraft carrier

        Well, why so light up something ... "doo-u-I-guess" yet laughing
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        spell out your arguments wider and brighter and you will be happy

        Yeah, let's ... laugh together wink
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 3 May 2018 06: 27
          +7
          Yeah, let's ... laugh together


          And here it remains only to laugh ... what are the practical results of the use of this ship in Syria? ...
          our two lost planes and a performance with a passage through the English Channel ... then what? what
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 3 May 2018 07: 01
            +1
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            what's next?

            We are not given to know that.
            But for sure - not for the sake of show-offs, they drove him there, show-offs in our country on the Internet, mostly, are found.
            1. Click
              Click 3 May 2018 07: 08
              +2
              Ponte FSB on heliks wink
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack 3 May 2018 07: 10
                +1
                Quote: Click
                Ponte FSB on heliks

                Did you see a familiar word? wink
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. Golovan Jack
                    Golovan Jack 3 May 2018 07: 20
                    +1
                    Quote: Click
                    I saw the general of the Internet, about the Ponte Internet speaker

                    Are you talking about cardboard stars? I don’t have them ... well, you understand.
                    As well as your opinion about me, however yes
            2. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 3 May 2018 07: 28
              +2
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              But for sure - not for the sake of Pontus drove him there,

              That I doubt it. In the words of All To Feni - and Ponte?
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack 3 May 2018 07: 31
                +1
                Quote: Mordvin 3
                In the words of All To Feni - and Ponte?

                Well, as long as he’s not the Minister of Defense ... and not even deputy request
                1. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 3 May 2018 07: 33
                  +2
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  he is still not the Minister of Defense ..

                  He generally disappeared somewhere. crying Sorry, cool people were.
                  1. Golovan Jack
                    Golovan Jack 3 May 2018 07: 34
                    +2
                    Quote: Mordvin 3
                    Pity

                    All die request
            3. Oleg14774
              Oleg14774 3 May 2018 09: 08
              +2
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Quote: The same LYOKHA
              what's next?

              We are not given to know that.
              But for sure - not for the sake of show-offs, they drove him there, show-offs in our country on the Internet, mostly, are found.

              For the sake of Pontus, unfortunately, they drove, as applying it there would be idiocy.
              Real FSB officers do not drive on helics, they clean terrorists in Dagestan and other cities, and on helics they drive the kids of snickering officials who came there for the sake of prestige. Do not confuse please. Different things! (about FSB on gelika this is an advance Click, with respect!)
      2. Cutter
        Cutter 3 May 2018 06: 22
        +9
        laughing laughing
        Checked in, first comment and ...
        Remove, ban.

        For this, registration was needed or in the case of what?
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack 3 May 2018 07: 30
          +2
          Quote: Cutter
          Checked in, first comment and ...

          Some people like "sharper" (c)
      3. agribkov79
        agribkov79 7 May 2018 15: 17
        +1
        You can’t steal so much on the construction of a new one.
    4. Украинец
      Украинец 3 May 2018 07: 27
      +6
      From you stupid!
      Yesterday I read in classmates:
      "Why do I need this Crimean bridge, why do I need this Syria? I want to live normally, have an apartment, a car and go on vacation at sea"
      Damn, is it really not clear that without a bridge and Syria, without a smoldering Kuzi, etc., you can generally stay without everything, including and without life
      1. mvg
        mvg 3 May 2018 08: 59
        0
        Well, somehow, after all, they lived until 2008, then until 2014 .. until the state again threw its people as it constantly does. 1991, 1998, 2004, 2008, 2014 .. this is not counting the elections.
      2. Bo Yari
        Bo Yari 3 May 2018 13: 21
        +1
        trouble ... just schizophrenia. believe me, nobody is going to kill your life. you are not interested in anyone.
        1. cedar
          cedar 3 May 2018 14: 59
          0
          "trouble ... just schizophrenia. turn, nobody is going to kill your life. you are not interested in anyone ..............................................
          ............. ..................................... ......... . ... ...... . . .. .

          I DO NOT BELIEVE.
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 3 May 2018 06: 02
    0
    Got it? Not even thirty years have passed! laughing or want to seriously increase defense funding?
  7. Bo Yari
    Bo Yari 3 May 2018 06: 05
    +6
    Well ... for whom is this material intended? to stupid cheers patriots? so they just can hang out the ribbon of St. George and not translate as many letters ... with such articles, the site turns into garbage
    1. Russia
      Russia 3 May 2018 06: 27
      +4
      Okay you buddy hi The country must know its heroes and these "dumbheads", believe me, is not the worst part of society.
    2. Nix1986
      Nix1986 3 May 2018 07: 00
      0
      Thoughts one to one. But if the product is missed by the administration, then there is a consumer.
  8. Shurale
    Shurale 3 May 2018 06: 23
    +2
    Brevity is the sister of talent, if this is a trend, then I am for ...))))))))))))))
    Soon, articles will consist of a poster with an inscription, there is such a site - demotivators, we are apparently moving there ...
  9. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 May 2018 06: 29
    +2
    The usual merikatosovskoe pounding loot for the Pentagon .... request
  10. Altona
    Altona 3 May 2018 06: 50
    +1
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    For normal analytics, such headlines are all rubbish and do not say anything.

    ------------------------------
    Now more emotional assessments are being given; the current NATO generals have not thought about battles with an equal enemy for a long time.
    1. Click
      Click 3 May 2018 07: 12
      0
      Then why are we expressing concern about missile defense, an increase in the contingent in the CIS countries, Georgia’s entry into NATO request ... we can send money instead of MO in retirement laughing
  11. AleksSandro
    AleksSandro 3 May 2018 06: 51
    +3
    As an “Air Force veteran,” I also like the Sukhoi Design Bureau more than anyone else, even more than the MiG Design Bureau, because it did not focus on a single type of UAV, but it produced fighter-interceptors, attack aircraft and front-line (operational-tactical) bombers and etc. (Su24, Su25, Su27, etc.). Good bureau, God grant him many years, so that again the "dashing 90s" do not happen again
  12. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 3 May 2018 06: 52
    +2
    list of conflicts in which these aircraft were used at different times: “Russia with Ukraine”
    Did they write with fear? This is when our aircraft was used in the "conflict with Ukraine"?
  13. Nix1986
    Nix1986 3 May 2018 06: 58
    +2
    Staying in an exalted state of the cheers of patriots and vatans needs to be maintained, so the daily flow of articles “Su 24 terrified Donald Cook”, “Admiral Kuznetsov terrified the entire US Navy” in the yellow press was already becoming familiar, but did not expect to see this on this site No.
  14. cradle
    cradle 3 May 2018 07: 01
    0
    Quote: Bo Yari
    the plane is successful ... 80s ... and now what year?

    So "them" also haven’t since, since
  15. arseniy.v.naumov
    arseniy.v.naumov 3 May 2018 07: 29
    0
    Auto translator or what?
    "Fighters" - fighters in this context should always be translated as "fighters"
    ,,
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. Abram
    Abram 3 May 2018 07: 52
    0
    Awesomely old, yes
  18. serezhasoldatow
    serezhasoldatow 3 May 2018 08: 34
    0
    Afraid means respected.
  19. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 3 May 2018 08: 50
    +1
    "At the same time, there is a list of conflicts in which these planes were used at different times:" Russia with Ukraine, "Ethiopia with Eritrea, Vietnam with China ..."
    And also: Ermak with Khan Kuchum, Kutuzov with Napoleon, Spartak and Dynamo ...
  20. gukoyan
    gukoyan 3 May 2018 09: 05
    +2
    Well, let's make a horror movie where the main role will be the SU-27 ... What's the problem?)
    Good idea, I’ll go get a patent for it and become a millionaire)
  21. Mestny
    Mestny 3 May 2018 09: 43
    -1
    Quote: Bo Yariy
    Well ... for whom is this material intended? to stupid cheers patriots? so they just can hang out the ribbon of St. George and not translate as many letters ... with such articles, the site turns into garbage

    And what kind of ribbon do you hang out? White?
    Why are you all climbing here? There are a lot of sites on the net for gays, democrats, and fighters with the Putin regime.
    Take a deep breath there.
    1. Bo Yari
      Bo Yari 3 May 2018 13: 24
      +1
      just don’t need to appropriate atriotism, okay?
  22. alexnmv5
    alexnmv5 3 May 2018 09: 51
    +1
    The plane came out good, you can’t argue. Only all those to whom we sell it are unlikely to be able to use its full potential. For modern combat, aircraft capabilities alone are not enough. Need a whole system. And so, well, one will fly out, or let two, or even several. Without the possibility of waging a modern combined-arms informative war, these are simply targets.
  23. cat Baiyun.
    cat Baiyun. 3 May 2018 10: 27
    +2
    And why they were afraid, they are also the "exclusive nation" and "the most powerful army in the WORLD" request
  24. Zomanus
    Zomanus 3 May 2018 12: 20
    0
    Well, if you go along the path of America and hang on the Su-27 container with improvers,
    then the plane will remain relevant for a long time.
  25. iouris
    iouris 3 May 2018 12: 41
    0
    Our people are everywhere: in Hollywood, in the White House, in NI ...
  26. canister
    canister 3 May 2018 15: 09
    0
    How did he terrify?
    The fact that Orion circled?
  27. Alexander Nezgovorov
    Alexander Nezgovorov 4 May 2018 00: 30
    0
    http://newsland.com/user/4297740007/content/v-sir
    ii-razbilsia-rossiiskii-istrebitel-oba-letchika-p
    ogibli / 6324777? utm_source = sendpulse & utm_mediu
    m = push & utm_campaign = 5888181 A Russian fighter plane crashed in Syria, both pilots were killed. VERY INTERESTING COMMENTS !!!
  28. 1970mk
    1970mk 4 May 2018 07: 54
    +1
    This nonsense amuses me! TAKE A HORROR! Our country is good - horror on neighbors and "Enemies alone". Does the people of Russia need this?