Military Review

Su-27 intercepted "Poseidon". Again "unprofessional"

120
The Russian Su-27 fighter intercepted a Boeing P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft in the skies above the Baltic, the American television channel CNN reported.




The incident occurred on May 1 in international airspace over the Baltic Sea.

According to the channel, referring to a military source, "the Russian fighter flew about 6 meters from an American plane."

According to the interlocutor, "rapprochement lasted about 9 minutes."

The source described the situation as "safe but unprofessional."

The representative of the US Navy, who commented on this report, noted that in terms such as "unprofessional" such cases on navy do not classify: aircraft rapprochements, as a rule, are characterized only as safe and unsafe. The described case refers more likely to the second option. American pilots, apparently, continue to believe that their flight should take place exclusively on their terms, even if it is carried out thousands of kilometers from the US coast
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
120 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 2 May 2018 09: 53
      +7
      If Russian, then "unsafe." "Poor and unhappy" Americans. Curious, but for harmful and nervous work they pay extra? So you can be in a psychiatric hospital.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Tusv
        Tusv 2 May 2018 11: 32
        +2
        Quote: oleg-gr
        If Russian, then "unsafe." "Poor and unhappy" Americans. Curious, but for harmful and nervous work they pay extra? So you can be in a psychiatric hospital.

        Probably pay extra. It's like diving in mercury
      3. koramax81
        koramax81 2 May 2018 12: 31
        +2
        Only milk for harmfulness give)))
      4. Lavrenti Pavlovich
        Lavrenti Pavlovich 2 May 2018 13: 21
        +5
        It would be better to hit "by accident."
      5. Flyer_64
        Flyer_64 2 May 2018 19: 29
        0
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Poor and unhappy "Americans. Curious, but for the harmful and nervous work they pay extra?

        Americans pay extra, because the flight to patrol, reconnaissance, or simply to the borders of the Russian Federation is their combat.
        1. NN52
          NN52 2 May 2018 19: 48
          +1
          Flyer_64

          Are you in charge of accruing salaries to American pilots, so write so confidently?
          And from what time is flying over international waters a battle?
          1. Flyer_64
            Flyer_64 2 May 2018 19: 58
            +1
            And from what time is flying over international waters a battle?

            Yes, I’m sure where I can say from. And I have nothing to do with dates. I have the honor
            1. NN52
              NN52 2 May 2018 20: 21
              +1
              Flyer_64

              No need to be so self-confident .. And I’ll say, I won’t say - this is a kindergarten ...
              Maybe our guys who constantly fly to escort amers from DZTell us about the fighting?
              And not only amers ..
              1. Pete mitchell
                Pete mitchell 2 May 2018 20: 43
                +2
                Quote: NN52
                Letun_64 No need to be so self-confident .. And I’ll say, I won’t say - this is a kindergarten ...
                Maybe our guys who constantly fly to escort amers from DZTell us about the fighting?
                And not only amers ..

                Hamarjoba Half a TwoListen, I overslept: what has arrived at the V. Tsymbal club? Well, thank God.
                Flyer_64But really, where does the information come from? Can I throw off the link? They simply serve and do not consider it heroism. Take a look at the photo ..
      6. canister
        canister 3 May 2018 15: 46
        0
        for the harmfulness of pepsi and cola give
    2. Hunter 2
      Hunter 2 2 May 2018 09: 53
      +20
      So - they worked beautifully and in a timely manner good !!!
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. shalim
          shalim 2 May 2018 10: 23
          +6
          we must already let them fly to us half a meter and send them to the fathers ...
          1. Hammerlock
            Hammerlock 2 May 2018 10: 33
            +2
            we must already let them fly to us half a meter and send them to the fathers ...
            [quote] [/ quote] so after all they will not fly, FOOTHS
            1. faridg7
              faridg7 2 May 2018 12: 42
              +5
              So you need to declare that they have flown, and bring down, and then let the Skripal prove that they did not fly.
          2. Vladimir_65
            Vladimir_65 3 May 2018 06: 14
            +1
            Not "let them fly", but force. A kilometer and a half to two. Let then prove that "not camels." Just then declare that we were “confident” in planning an attack on some strategic fishing longboat that was in the Barents Sea at that time. Well, one hell, they don’t know geography. That Iran, that Iraq, or Sweden and Switzerland - all are one.
      2. figwam
        figwam 2 May 2018 10: 20
        +9
        Quote: Hunter 2
        So - they worked beautifully and in a timely manner good !!!

        Yes, that's for sure!
        Su-27 intercepted "Poseidon". Again "unprofessional"

        So our pilot did everything right.
      3. Vita vko
        Vita vko 2 May 2018 10: 30
        +10
        Quote: Hunter 2
        handsomely

        this is when kerosene is poured on top of the P-8 Poseidon, as it has already been done more than once, or paint is sprayed, preferably such that the communications and intelligence means stop working. Then they will really have to scrub antennas and optics for a long time.
        1. faridg7
          faridg7 2 May 2018 12: 44
          +5
          Quote: Vita VKO
          Quote: Hunter 2
          handsomely

          this is when kerosene is poured on top of the P-8 Poseidon, as it has already been done more than once, or paint is sprayed, preferably such that the communications and intelligence means stop working. Then they will really have to scrub antennas and optics for a long time.

          Yes, at least fill the cabin, let them show the flight and landing under the curtain
        2. iaroslav.mudryi
          iaroslav.mudryi 2 May 2018 14: 06
          +4
          Quote: Vita VKO
          ... this is when kerosene is poured on top of P-8 Poseidon, as it has already been done more than once ...


          Here is a detailed account of this case, as our ace Vasya TsIMbal intercepted the Norwegian P-3 Orion:

          https://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201604200
          808-3xfn.htm
          http://dom.nsk.ru/avatar/279523/ptgannounce_22716
          2
          1. Flyer_64
            Flyer_64 2 May 2018 19: 32
            0
            Quote: iaroslav.mudryi
            Quote: Vita VKO
            ... this is when kerosene is poured on top of P-8 Poseidon, as it has already been done more than once ...
            Here is a detailed account of this case, as our ace Vasya TsIMbal intercepted the Norwegian P-3 Orion:

            Not an expert but the photo is mounted. As Vasya Tsimbal substituted himself to chop his tail. Rave
            1. iaroslav.mudryi
              iaroslav.mudryi 2 May 2018 21: 27
              0
              Quote: Letun_64
              Not an expert but the photo is mounted. As Vasya Tsimbal substituted himself to chop his tail. Rave


              This is a well-known fact, google and you will find many other photos and details, this is not even a topic for discussion. hi
              1. Flyer_64
                Flyer_64 2 May 2018 21: 54
                +1
                Quote: iaroslav.mudryi
                Quote: Letun_64
                Not an expert but the photo is mounted. As Vasya Tsimbal substituted himself to chop his tail. Rave


                This is a well-known fact, google and you will find many other photos and details, this is not even a topic for discussion. hi

                Thank. Who did the photo. The third is who? I’ll go through other sources that are more competent than not.
            2. iaroslav.mudryi
              iaroslav.mudryi 3 May 2018 17: 11
              0
              Quote: Letun_64
              Not an expert but the photo is mounted. As Vasya Tsimbal substituted himself to chop his tail. Rave


              Dear Flyer_64!
              To get acquainted with this case, for those who may not have heard about it, I gave a link to the website of the Zvezda TV channel, where this article was published (there are a lot of other publications that wrote about it). Attention! caption for this photo: Photo: mycity-military.com/US Navy / Russian Ministry of Defense Even if this is an installation, we made it over the hill, and ours only reprinted it.


              Further, I invite you and all forum users to familiarize themselves with the translation of last year's (in honor of the 30 anniversary of the event) publication of the Norwegians: (c) Torbjørn Løvland, Christian Nørstebø (foto), where the crew of Orion, already pensioners, tell us about the incident that they had then survive, thank God everyone was alive! A lot of interesting photos. As for the third person who took the photo, I quote from a Norwegian article:
              "At that time, the Su-27 was the newest type of aircraft, and the crew of the Norwegian Orion for the first time was able to get good fighter images from a distance of only 25 meters. Then between the pilots F-16 and P-3 There was a real competition, which of them will be able to get the best pictures of Russian cars. "The Soviet pilot also showed the bottom of his plane with all the missiles on the suspension."
              It is likely that there could be the mentioned F-16.
              source:
              https://andrej-kraft.livejournal.com/93023.html
      4. iaroslav.mudryi
        iaroslav.mudryi 2 May 2018 16: 31
        0
        Quote: Hunter 2
        So - they worked beautifully and in a timely manner good !!!


        It worked beautifully and on time, yes. But what we know from the news is the interception of 29.01.2018 over the Black Sea and yesterday's interception of 01.05.2018 over the Baltic. But for the rest, both our and the Western press are silent for some reason. On Military Radar, I counted more than 30 flights by American P-8a and RC-135 in the Baltic and near Crimea and Novorossiysk for the period from January 27, that is, for the last three months. Just look how insistently they climb to our borders! Anyone interested can find here:
        https://twitter.com/mil_radar
        several screenshots, selectively:
        March 19 2018

        translation of one Polish comment under the screen: “There haven’t been such a number of NATO electronic warfare aircraft near the borders of the Kaliningrad region for decades!
        April 3 2018

        an American electrical engineer from Massachusetts writes there in his comment under this screen: "Stop poking the damned bear. What the hell is wrong with us?"
        One feels that ordinary Westerners are already completely intimidated by their NATO.
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 2 May 2018 18: 13
          +3
          Su-27 intercepted "Poseidon". Again "unprofessional"
          for our "non-professionals" - drinks
  2. Ankipelgygyrgyn
    Ankipelgygyrgyn 2 May 2018 09: 54
    +6
    Unsafe means diapers are filled.
    1. helmi8
      helmi8 2 May 2018 10: 07
      +4
      Quote: Ankypelgygyrgyn
      Unsafe means diapers filled

      Pampers are required just like a parachute. No way without him ... wassat
  3. svp67
    svp67 2 May 2018 09: 56
    +12
    The incident occurred on May 1 in international airspace.
    That is fresh ...
    According to the channel, referring to a military source, "the Russian fighter flew about 6 meters from an American plane."
    It is interesting at 6 meters from which part of it? Fighter Pilot - KRASAVA
    1. Merold
      Merold 2 May 2018 10: 19
      +3
      Quote: svp67
      The incident occurred on May 1 in international airspace.
      That is fresh ...
      According to the channel, referring to a military source, "the Russian fighter flew about 6 meters from an American plane."
      It is interesting at 6 meters from which part of it? Fighter Pilot - KRASAVA

      But if Poseidon was accompanied by a couple of fighters, then would the pilot of Su act in the same way? Why is this childishness?
      1. KCA
        KCA 2 May 2018 10: 24
        +15
        If they would have accompanied, we would have gone 3 DRY
      2. sabakina
        sabakina 2 May 2018 10: 28
        +11
        And what? Should I let him fly over the Kaliningrad region?
        And yet, I noticed a tendency, as an ordinary, ak necessarily a alarmist. Or maybe a provocateur.
        1. Merold
          Merold 2 May 2018 10: 36
          +7
          Quote: sabakina
          And what? Should I let him fly over the Kaliningrad region?
          And yet, I noticed a tendency, as an ordinary, ak necessarily a alarmist. Or maybe a provocateur.

          1. The plane flew in international space. The carcasses fly exactly the same way, but I have not heard that they would have been so “puffed up” over them.
          2. An alarmist and provocateur, is it because I consider such maneuvers childish and unprofessional? Well, why do this? What would you write in the media that “pin.dosas” were out of fear and lacked diapers? How old are you?
          1. sabakina
            sabakina 2 May 2018 10: 47
            +17
            Sixty ten exchanged. This time. The second one. They do not compile a climate map of the Baltic states there, but generally they are engaged in intelligence.
            1. Korax71
              Korax71 2 May 2018 10: 55
              +4
              The key word is without entering our airspace. Someday these fortels will end very shitty, all the more plenty of examples in history.
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack 2 May 2018 10: 57
                +6
                Quote: Korax71
                sometime these fortels end very shitty

                Under the Union there were no fewer such fortels.
                They just didn't tell us about them. On the principle of "less you know - sleep better."
                And they won’t end in anything like that. Routine with request
                1. Korax71
                  Korax71 2 May 2018 11: 33
                  +3
                  On May 25, 1968, the death of the crew, led by Colonel Pliev, when flying over an extremely low altitude of the Essex aircraft carrier off the coast of Norway.
                  1. Golovan Jack
                    Golovan Jack 2 May 2018 11: 37
                    +6
                    Quote: Korax71
                    not a single case

                    Do not bother, I saw this record. The case is sad, but, oddly enough, nothing special.
                    And it is necessary to keep “partners” in good shape. Behind that the Army, in fact.
                  2. demo
                    demo 2 May 2018 12: 51
                    +3
                    May 25, 1968 crash of Tu-16R aircraft, spacecraft n / a crew Pliev A. The crew carried out reconnaissance of the US Navy aircraft carrier Essex in the Norwegian Sea. Turning around at low altitude, I caught water on my wing. The crew died, the bodies of three crew members were raised by the Americans and handed over to Soviet representatives. The remaining crew members, 5 people, were not found.
              2. Dead duck
                Dead duck 2 May 2018 11: 31
                +7
                Quote: Korax71
                Keyword without entering our airspace

                for a long time for this and no need to go into it request
                Israel, too, does not go into Syrian, but the consequences of "spans" are known yes
              3. Avis-bis
                Avis-bis 2 May 2018 12: 59
                +4
                Quote: Korax71
                The key word is without entering our airspace. Someday these fortels will end very shitty, all the more plenty of examples in history.

                Have you really never seen photos of the close approaches of the F-4 or F-14 to our aircraft in the international airspace?
            2. Merold
              Merold 2 May 2018 11: 02
              +1
              Quote: sabakina
              Sixty ten exchanged. This time. The second one. They do not compile a climate map of the Baltic states there, but generally they are engaged in intelligence.

              Judging by the comments, I thought you were much younger.
              What prevents them from conducting reconnaissance?
              Do these planes have Russia for flights between Samara and Ulyanovsk?

              1. sabakina
                sabakina 2 May 2018 11: 10
                +5
                Judging by the comments, I thought you were much younger.
                Thanks for the complement. And then I wanted to record myself in the old fart. The second one. These aircraft in Russia are designed to fly over enemy territory under the Open Skies program, where they fly along a strictly allotted route and time. Anesten? We, this May 1 flight, didn’t agree with them in any way.
                1. Merold
                  Merold 2 May 2018 11: 34
                  0
                  Quote: sabakina
                  We, this May 1 flight, didn’t agree with them in any way.

                  Did you have to coordinate it?
          2. Tusv
            Tusv 2 May 2018 12: 43
            +2
            Quote: Merold
            1. The plane flew in international space. The carcasses fly exactly the same way, but I have not heard that they would have been so “puffed up” over them.

            Personally, my international space begins 100 km from the coast. And the NATO pilots will also "swagger" if the carcasses fly less than 100. What the hell !. All their aircraft will be lifted into the air and will never be ceremony. And NATO is already quite impudent, flying up to 17 km from the border, which is prohibited by an unspoken agreement. It's time to give this pepelats to our "nerds" to be torn to pieces, and invite their pilots to tea in the cellars of the "bloody Gabny", motivating fig GLONASS for us, and radars from Stone Age hi
            In general, Trump must be trusted. We have abominably wrong air defense
            1. Merold
              Merold 2 May 2018 14: 06
              0
              Quote: Tusv
              Quote: Merold
              1. The plane flew in international space. The carcasses fly exactly the same way, but I have not heard that they would have been so “puffed up” over them.

              Personally, my international space begins 100 km from the coast. And the NATO pilots will also "swagger" if the carcasses fly less than 100. What the hell !. All their aircraft will be lifted into the air and will never be ceremony. And NATO is already quite impudent, flying up to 17 km from the border, which is prohibited by an unspoken agreement. It's time to give this pepelats to our "nerds" to be torn to pieces, and invite their pilots to tea in the cellars of the "bloody Gabny", motivating fig GLONASS for us, and radars from Stone Age hi
              In general, Trump must be trusted. We have abominably wrong air defense

              In your post you have only guesses, assumptions, Wishlist and fantasies. What I had to draw from it, I did not understand.
              1. Tusv
                Tusv 2 May 2018 14: 30
                +1
                Quote: Merold
                In your post you have only guesses, assumptions, Wishlist and fantasies. What I had to draw from it, I did not understand.

                Wishlist I have completely mundane. 100 km from the border and no one will touch them. But then you give me the perfect nonsense here. Incidentally, we are not allowed to fly over the Lamans. Inveterate "partners" do not understand. Here the stench spills so much when Our ships go along the shortest path, and not as usual Between Ireland and Iceland.
                Pay for excess solarium and kerosene from your pocket, if you like it. And an extra study of technology will not hurt us hi
                PS: We are not literate people. Serve a couple of megabytes for food
                1. Merold
                  Merold 2 May 2018 14: 34
                  0
                  Quote: Tusv
                  Quote: Merold
                  In your post you have only guesses, assumptions, Wishlist and fantasies. What I had to draw from it, I did not understand.

                  Wishlist I have completely mundane. 100 km from the border and no one will touch them. But then you give me the perfect nonsense here. Incidentally, we are not allowed to fly over the Lamans. Inveterate "partners" do not understand. Here the stench spills so much when Our ships go along the shortest path, and not as usual Between Ireland and Iceland.
                  Pay for excess solarium and kerosene from your pocket, if you like it. And an extra study of technology will not hurt us hi

                  Tell me, do you have a claim to the “partners” in terms of international norms and law, and not just because you invented something for yourself there?
                  1. Tusv
                    Tusv 2 May 2018 14: 52
                    +1
                    Quote: Merold
                    Tell me, do you have a claim to the “partners” in terms of international norms and law, and not just because you invented something for yourself there?

                    Once again for the nervous Europe. I repeat. Ours have to give a hook, so as not to disturb the offspring of fish. And they could roam tons of syuds on the English Channel, absolutely not violating international law. Have you thought about this? So why should I observe absolutely fake legislation when a ugly 17 km flies up to me. Two times and you have no air defense. Feed yourself with Axes. They are satisfying, but not in my country hi
                    1. Merold
                      Merold 2 May 2018 15: 05
                      0
                      Quote: Tusv

                      Once again for the nervous Europe. I repeat. Ours have to give a hook, so as not to disturb the offspring of fish. And they could roam tons of syuds on the English Channel, absolutely not violating international law. Have you thought about this? :

                      Are you delirious? This Kuzya, "Severomorsk" and "Vice Admiral Kulakov" where are they? Through the Panama Canal?

                      And there, 10 km to Dover. not 17, like an airplane.
                      1. Tusv
                        Tusv 2 May 2018 15: 48
                        0
                        Quote: Merold
                        And there, 10 km to Dover. not 17, like an airplane

                        Well Duc show your Dover. Or did the camera crash? Buy yourself a new one and do not dream of a Paparazzi career. It's sucks. Rzhu Nimagu
          3. AIR
            AIR 2 May 2018 18: 01
            +1
            Listen, there are instructions and orders for combat duty. Everything is clearly spelled out there. When to take off, how and how much to accompany. If it comes to our zone without even entering it, the plane flies for escort. In general, there is something in the order and at what distance to escort. But how Americans rated it, this is their problem. Our aircraft follow their orders. And them, generally why the hell fly in the Baltic and the Black Sea? Something you immediately took their side? What a childishness! Reasoning as a child from kindergarten "Camomile".
          4. Flyer_64
            Flyer_64 2 May 2018 19: 44
            +1
            Quote: Merold
            Quote: sabakina
            And what? Should I let him fly over the Kaliningrad region?
            And yet, I noticed a tendency, as an ordinary, ak necessarily a alarmist. Or maybe a provocateur.

            1. The plane flew in international space. The carcasses fly exactly the same way, but I have not heard that they would have been so “puffed up” over them.
            2. An alarmist and provocateur, is it because I consider such maneuvers childish and unprofessional? Well, why do this? What would you write in the media that “pin.dosas” were out of fear and lacked diapers? How old are you?

            Oh brother. Would you know that your beloved gentle Americans are doing. In the middle-earth, when approaching the ship, right before the landing, an American comrade flew right above me on the AV-8B Harrier. Thanks to Kamov, the helicopter did not allow water to swallow. And that was when we were kind of friends. It’s just that we don’t raise cries like them, but we remember and, on occasion, there is an answer. In general, look at the anthology of Zadorny, he clearly characterized the behavior of the Americans in the story about the aircraft carrier and the island lighthouse.
      3. Tusv
        Tusv 2 May 2018 11: 15
        +6
        Quote: Merold
        But if Poseidon was accompanied by a couple of fighters, then would the pilot of Su act in the same way? Why is this childishness?

        Uh brother. There will be right away. Disneyland Or a free circus in IKO. Nato’s passed that their scouts have not been escorted for a long time hi Trolling in full. They go off like a fan, they say they’ll attack you from the ground, then they’ll come into the tail a few times and will childishly excite themselves, they say your grief ends, and here we’re still a couple of hours on hooligans laughing Classic hi
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 2 May 2018 11: 18
          +2
          Vladimir, where did you get this?
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 2 May 2018 11: 21
            +1
            Quote: sabakina
            Vladimir, where did you get this?

            On the database Glory drinks
        2. Merold
          Merold 2 May 2018 15: 53
          0
          Quote: Tusv
          Quote: Merold
          And there, 10 km to Dover. not 17, like an airplane

          Well Duc show your Dover. Or did the camera crash? Buy yourself a new one and don't dream about Paparay’s career

          This is advised to me by a man who claimed that
          Ours have to give a hook, so as not to disturb the offspring of fish. And they could march about here on the English Channel,

          and after the video with the passage along the English Channel merged?
      4. certero
        certero 2 May 2018 11: 50
        0
        Always at all times, fighter jets flew as close as possible to ours that are American. Remember how in the song about Tu95: "and almost into the blister for us wing"
      5. svp67
        svp67 2 May 2018 14: 01
        0
        Quote: Merold
        But if Poseidon was accompanied by a couple of fighters, then would the pilot of Su act in the same way?

        Accompany his fighter cover and our plane would not be ONE.
        Quote: Merold
        Why is this childishness?

        And what would they not relax and remember that maybe nothing is on our border, and even in the Baltic, the Americans did not lose ...
        1. Merold
          Merold 2 May 2018 14: 30
          0
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: Merold
          But if Poseidon was accompanied by a couple of fighters, then would the pilot of Su act in the same way?

          Accompany his fighter cover and our plane would not be ONE ..

          AND? Would the Su-27 begin to perform such dances before the F-15?
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: Merold
          Why is this childishness?

          And what would they not relax and remember that maybe nothing is on our border, and even in the Baltic, the Americans did not lose ...

          Does the method seem not to work very well? Both flew and fly.
          1. svp67
            svp67 2 May 2018 15: 25
            +1
            Quote: Merold
            AND? Would the Su-27 begin to perform such dances before the F-15?

            But there was NO dancing ... The plane neatly approached an alien plane, wrote down its numbers, the pilot looked into the eyes of the enemy pilot and stepped back ... What kind of "dances" are you talking about?
            Quote: Merold
            Does the method seem not to work very well? Both flew and fly.

            How to say. Some crews simply quit after such flights.
            1. Merold
              Merold 2 May 2018 15: 30
              0
              Quote: svp67
              Quote: Merold
              Does the method seem not to work very well? Both flew and fly.

              How to say. Some crews simply quit after such flights.

              Seriously? Can you give me more details?
              1. svp67
                svp67 2 May 2018 15: 37
                0
                Quote: Merold
                Seriously?

                Just kidding, of course ...
                Quote: Merold
                Can you give me more details?

                It's you in The National Interest, there is such a publisher, read.
    2. iaroslav.mudryi
      iaroslav.mudryi 2 May 2018 14: 32
      +1
      [quote = svp67] [quote] That is, fresh ...
      It is interesting in 6 meters from which part of it? Fighter pilot -Krasava [/ quote]
      Yes, the incident is fresh, but in the CNN video they talked about previous interceptions and showed footage from the American Orion from the interception over the Black Sea on 29 on January 2018 of the year, you can understand how the interception takes place, this video:

      Interestingly:
      "According to American statements, the Russian fighter escorted the EP-3E 2 hours 40 minutes. Lockheed Martin EP-3E Orion (ARIES II) US Navy 157326 (serial number 285A-5541ARM) call number and callback off the coast of Crimea 26 "

      So what did they forget so close to our shores? The answer is obvious - they have nothing to do here - methodically drive away by all means and means that we have in our arsenal.
      source: https: //bmpd.livejournal.com/3076435.htm
      l
  4. nPuBaTuP
    nPuBaTuP 2 May 2018 09: 56
    +2
    Again, the NATO flyers only took playing cards and showed them our way .... and they were given ....
  5. 210ox
    210ox 2 May 2018 09: 56
    +7
    And if the Amerzian had a ramp and sashes behind, then he would have flown inside ... There are already specialists .. laughing
    1. sabakina
      sabakina 2 May 2018 10: 49
      +1
      Dmitry, well, if you wish, you can look at those open sashes ... repeat
  6. Opera
    Opera 2 May 2018 09: 58
    0
    Quote: svp67
    It is interesting at 6 meters from which part of it? Fighter Pilot - KRASAVA

    Well, if within 9 minutes I think there were options!)
  7. Nevsky_ZU
    Nevsky_ZU 2 May 2018 10: 00
    +2
    Su-27 intercepted "Poseidon". Again "unprofessional"

    Well what is this going on? Oh... crying
    1. AVA77
      AVA77 2 May 2018 16: 21
      0
      W these trams also do that laughing grunting and my head completely. I can’t do anything anymore. I’ll go and take thirty drops of valerian. (The Master and Margarita) laughing
  8. pvv113
    pvv113 2 May 2018 10: 01
    +3
    The source described the situation as "safe but unprofessional."

    I wonder what criteria measure adversaries measure professionalism? I never remember. so they rate the interception as professional
    1. helmi8
      helmi8 2 May 2018 10: 12
      +2
      Quote: pvv113
      I wonder what criteria measure adversaries measure professionalism?

      If it is less than a kilometer closer, this is unprofessional, and if it is even closer (before emptying into diapers), then this is already unsafe. Well, or vice versa. lol Their logic is hard to understand where one ends and the other begins.
      I never remember. so that they appreciate the interception professionally

      And there will be no one to evaluate ... Unless from the earth. wink
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 2 May 2018 10: 24
        +1
        So I thought that by the smell wink
      2. Korax71
        Korax71 2 May 2018 10: 59
        +1
        There are established rules of behavior in the international space. Everything else they will consider to be unprofessional. And about diapers, jokes are funny only to people with no gray matter in the tower. Give something newer already.
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack 2 May 2018 11: 07
          +1
          Quote: Korax71
          There are established rules of conduct in the international space

          Right But the Korean Boeing at one time was shot down quite correctly. And the "partners" were always plucked so as not to relax much - that of the Union, that now. And that too is right.
          Quote: Korax71
          they will consider everything else not professional

          And pooh on what they "consider" there.
          Quote: Korax71
          but about diapers jokes

          But for the diapers, I would have banned, because they really got tired of them already.
          1. Korax71
            Korax71 2 May 2018 11: 54
            +2
            Jack. Despite the geometrically opposite views on many things, as far as the ban for diapers is concerned, I agree and support good
          2. kirgiz58
            kirgiz58 2 May 2018 16: 24
            0
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            But for diapers, I would ban

            Good! We will say "a known device in the printer for absorbing ink" - IWMI laughing
    2. Dababi
      Dababi 2 May 2018 10: 21
      +2
      Criterion one - How wet the underwear of brave American guys. Squeeze upon arrival at the base in the beaker, and there the division - "Prof", "Neprof"
    3. Merold
      Merold 2 May 2018 11: 11
      +1
      Quote: pvv113
      The source described the situation as "safe but unprofessional."

      I wonder what criteria measure adversaries measure professionalism? I never remember. so they rate the interception as professional


      American general recognized the professionalism of Russian pilots during interceptions
      https://topwar.ru/97678-amerikanskiy-general-priz
      nal-professionalizm-rossiyskih-letchikov-pri-pere
      hvatah.html? from = mirtesen
  9. Laruss
    Laruss 2 May 2018 10: 02
    0
    Well, as he does not agree with Zadornov .., stupid and there are stupid. Few showed them that such "jokes" are dangerous to their health ...
  10. Bully
    Bully 2 May 2018 10: 05
    +2
    I am surprised at this kind of news. About 30 years ago, they simply did not exist. The Pepsi generation apparently drives. Service in the army is not a safe thing at all :) Boys who don’t like a quiet life always went to military schools.
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 2 May 2018 10: 06
    +5
    Readiness is checked. I remember May 1 at the time of the U-2 shot down. Also before this I flew with impunity.
  12. Valerevich
    Valerevich 2 May 2018 10: 07
    +2
    They are low-chilled.
  13. Dababi
    Dababi 2 May 2018 10: 17
    +4
    Lockheed U-2 reconnaissance aircraft with pilot Gary Powers was shot down over Sverdlovsk on May 1, 1960. After that, they no longer flew into the arrogant.
    1. Avis-bis
      Avis-bis 2 May 2018 10: 32
      +2
      Quote: Dababi
      Lockheed U-2 reconnaissance aircraft with pilot Gary Powers was shot down over Sverdlovsk on May 1, 1960. After that, they no longer flew into the arrogant.

      Balloons, I think, are also "impudent."
  14. Ased
    Ased 2 May 2018 10: 18
    0
    We carry out unsafe interceptions, they are polite escorts.
    Since ours is a valiant intelligence officer, theirs is an imperialist spy :)
  15. kaserog
    kaserog 2 May 2018 10: 20
    0
    Quote: pvv113
    I never remember. so they rate the interception as professional

    unprofessional - pro al rocket al cannon escorts adversary
  16. pvv113
    pvv113 2 May 2018 10: 26
    +4
    Quote: Dababi
    How wet the brave American lingerie is.

    Brave guys from the United States underwear will not hurt. They prudently wear diapers
  17. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 2 May 2018 10: 31
    +1
    And if you switch to supersonic 20 meters from their trough - will it not fall apart? It will be professional, but unsafe wassat
  18. Abram
    Abram 2 May 2018 10: 33
    +4
    where does the distance to the American coast, if the space is neutral? Fly with an American who doesn’t. And if there’s nothing or nowhere, then these are your problems. old Vitya Leonova again drive, scare)
    1. sabakina
      sabakina 2 May 2018 10: 52
      +2
      Abram sapsem chopping block! ...
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 2 May 2018 12: 05
        +2
        He registered today, and has already managed to write so many dirty tricks that you wonder.
        1. kirgiz58
          kirgiz58 2 May 2018 16: 29
          0
          Quote: rotmistr60
          He registered today, and has already managed to write so many dirty tricks that you wonder.

          This is a staffer in Frankfurt am Main. Then he will be scattered under a different nickname, and Abram will safely “die” without receiving a cap. yes
  19. spumartu
    spumartu 2 May 2018 10: 35
    +1
    They used to say, “Don’t get smart, but show with your finger which way to sail,” but now we’re flying 6 meters from Poseidon. Well, it’s time we’d already have to show what we learned, we’ll spend dough on the maintenance of generals and the army, “not all cabbage soup slurp.”
    1. iouris
      iouris 2 May 2018 10: 49
      +1
      Quote: spumartu
      Well, it's time to show what you have learned

      They didn’t learn anything: as before, superior bosses shift responsibility to subordinates. A pilot in the air is obliged to resolve issues that the Foreign Ministry and Defense Ministry do not solve by using the threat of ramming. Taran is the favorite weapon of chiefs who are unable to designate the “red line” for the enemy.
      1. ZaMir
        ZaMir 2 May 2018 15: 47
        +1
        So the pilot is that "pencil" with which the Moscow region draws a "red line". He is part of our MO
        1. iouris
          iouris 2 May 2018 21: 02
          0
          I saw a pilot. The pilot does not look like a pencil with which they draw. Our MO is risking our pilot.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 2 May 2018 21: 15
            0
            Quote: iouris
            Our MO risks our pilot

            It is better, of course, when the planes do not fly, and no one risks anything (and no one).
            Did I understand you correctly?
  20. pavelwf1
    pavelwf1 2 May 2018 10: 45
    +1
    Quote: pvv113
    Quote: Dababi
    How wet the brave American lingerie is.

    Brave guys from the United States underwear will not hurt. They prudently wear diapers


    Well, yes, so professionally dressed in diapers, Russian pilots, and indeed the whole army of the Russian Federation, just can not! Where are we, to the "exceptional"! ?? After all, professionally put on pants, the whole prerogative of the US Army and NATO! Forgive us for our unprofessional approach.))))))))
    1. Avis-bis
      Avis-bis 2 May 2018 13: 03
      +2
      Quote: pavelwf1

      Well, yes, so professionally dressed in diapers, Russian pilots, and indeed the whole army of the Russian Federation, just can not! Where are we, to the "exceptional"! ?? After all, professionally put on pants, the whole prerogative of the US Army and NATO! Forgive us for our unprofessional approach.))))))))

      Read about RB-47 flights through our airspace in the North.
  21. Petrix
    Petrix 2 May 2018 10: 46
    +1
    After the Poseidon stitched by a burst of Su-27 crashed into the sea, the Pentagon representatives changed their assessment of interception to "professional, but dangerous."
  22. bald
    bald 2 May 2018 11: 02
    0
    We probe each other, one of the Baltic waters, the other of the curious. But away from home, it is always unsafe.
  23. Tolik_74
    Tolik_74 2 May 2018 11: 12
    +1
    Amer girls cry again. And if you fly even closer, probably diapers will not help, they will begin to write off immediately
  24. Aandrewsir
    Aandrewsir 2 May 2018 11: 19
    +1
    And American pilots "professionally" put on pants? Accustomed to impunity, and then "here you are" ...
  25. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 2 May 2018 11: 41
    0
    In fact, any interception, and even with the possibility of using guns, is quite professional. And with visual displays (in the absence of radio communication), it’s completely according to the rules. These are not passenger airplanes ...
    And what's under the wings in the photo? Anti-ship "Harpoons"?
  26. cradle
    cradle 2 May 2018 11: 53
    0
    Quote: Tolik_74
    Amer girls cry again. And if you fly even closer, probably diapers will not help, they will begin to write off immediately

    They are just fuuuu ... not men
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. BASTA
    BASTA 2 May 2018 12: 44
    0
    why not professionally ..?! - If the Su-27 had crept up .. and stepped forward at ..and would have blown from its nozzles into his nose .., so they would pile in their pants :)
  29. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 2 May 2018 13: 45
    +1
    Where are the cons ??? Give at least some way to influence the fecal army !!! Or at least remove such comments. Modera, work more actively !!! Give battle to verbal diarrhea! Even angelic patience is not endless.
  30. daodejin
    daodejin 2 May 2018 13: 52
    +1
    Here are the weird ones. We have the 9th parade. Knights and Swifts need to practice.
  31. AleksSandro
    AleksSandro 2 May 2018 14: 16
    0
    In a happy time we live! In Soviet times, for such risks (extremely dangerous rapprochement) of our pilots, the authorities had complete! only amos could afford this in relation to ours. And now we can! Hooray! In addition, if a collision of a fighter with a long-range or transport aircraft, or with an AWACS aircraft results in the destruction of a wing or something else (keel, tail), it will be able to catapult, however, it will need to be picked up by the search (helicopter) group as much as possible rather, otherwise in the northern seas he will have a kayak in 15 minutes, or even in 10 minutes. But for the entire crew of the enemy’s aircraft (from 6-7 people in a small transporter to 12-15 on a B-52 and up to 50 on a full AWACS) it will be “the last flight of the albatross.” By the way, when it comes to our “partners,” you must specify the original in addition to the Russian translation, so that it is more accurate and understandable - unsafe, which means “safe”, unprofessional, means “unprofessional”, or some other word that is not quite correctly translated?
  32. Semyonych
    Semyonych 2 May 2018 16: 11
    0
    Quote: Labrador
    By the way, why unprofessional? All are alive healthy. And if someone was obsessed, then the unprofessionalism of those obsessed is moral instability, so to speak.

    NO NO. Let him tell how he overtook, how he cut ..
    1. iaroslav.mudryi
      iaroslav.mudryi 2 May 2018 18: 08
      0
      Quote: Semyonitch
      Quote: Labrador
      By the way, why unprofessional? All are alive healthy. And if someone was obsessed, then the unprofessionalism of those obsessed is moral instability, so to speak.

      NO NO. Let him tell how he overtook, how he cut ..


      Like this:
  33. Region38
    Region38 2 May 2018 16: 39
    0
    Interestingly, do diapers come in the set of on-board equipment at Poseidon or do they manage to get to the toilet?
  34. shirkoled
    shirkoled 2 May 2018 18: 02
    0
    It is necessary to bring down amers and NATO members !!!
  35. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 2 May 2018 19: 23
    +1
    Do you have insurance for a psychiatrist?
  36. Flyer_64
    Flyer_64 2 May 2018 19: 53
    0
    According to the channel, referring to a military source, "the Russian fighter flew about 6 meters from an American plane."

    Bullshit for the layman. Whoever flew will confirm with an interval of 6 meters the rivets can be seen. How many videos were shown all in the aisles of norms.
  37. Flyer_64
    Flyer_64 2 May 2018 21: 55
    0
    Quote: Pete Mitchell
    They simply serve and do not consider it heroism.

    Who are you talking about?
  38. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 2 May 2018 22: 24
    0
    If it’s “unsafe”, then why are you letting the ignoramus at the helm, eh, Americans?
  39. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 3 May 2018 03: 32
    0
    When scared, it means unprofessional !!! You should have seen what they were doing unprofessionally !!! - you would have forgotten about all flights near the borders of Russia.
  40. Dikson
    Dikson 3 May 2018 06: 43
    0
    Well what kind of nonsense in the title? What is there "Interception" ?! Of course it’s unprofessional .. A professional interception would have been if this “Poseidon” had been shot down to hell .. And so, it was just tracking the target .. the American pilot still had to shine with a laser pointer in his eye .. or thermal traps in his engine shoot off .. (
  41. Senior manager
    Senior manager 7 May 2018 16: 16
    0
    If the Amersans say "unprofessionally," then expertly and the hands of the exceptional ones shook. My thanks to the pilot.