Immediately brigade kit. Arctic version of the air defense system "Tor-M2DT" will enter the army until November

The short-range Tor-M2DT brigade complex of the short-range anti-aircraft missile system to perform tasks in the Arctic is planned to be delivered to the troops until November, Interfax reports, citing a military source.

State tests of the Tor-M2DT air defense system should be completed in the first half of this year.

Top-M2DT is an arctic version of the Top-M2 complex mounted on DT-30 two-link track-type conveyors.

These complexes have a unique maneuverability, can overcome ditches, swim, do not lose their performance in the 50-degree frost. The 16 complex consists of vertical-launch anti-aircraft missiles with a range of damage up to 12 km and an altitude range up to 10 thousands of meters

- Reported earlier in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

The air defense missile system is capable of simultaneously firing at four air targets attacking from various directions.

Former commander of the North fleet Russian Federation Nikolai Evmenov said that the combat capabilities of the troops stationed in the Arctic will be increased.

Comments

[Vard]

But we seem to be ahead of the rest in this matter ... and it pleases ...

[Hire]

Interestingly, can he work afloat?

[Vard]

Yes, it’s swimming ... and it can even shoot from the water ... moreover ... if everyone is lost! tracks retains the ability to move ...

[Xfgfq]

Quote: Hire

Interestingly, can he work afloat?

Not only! He can dive into the water, sink all submarines, and then fly into outer space, shoot down all enemy satellites and land right away at the parade on Red Square

[72jora72]

Not only! He can dive into the water, drown all submarines, and then fly into outer space, shoot down all enemy satellites and land right away at the parade on wassat red square

Humorist? Petrosyan humoresque did not try to write?

[76rtbr]

but he doesn’t try to say something and writes !! he has such a share, SHARE !!!

[Bell pepper]

You always write about your advanced technologies in rocket science and air defense systems, etc. etc.
Horsho, I agree that this is so.

BUT WHERE ARE THEY WHEN YOU NEED??

Israel bombed Syria again, Russian air defense systems are again silent !.
Russian generals too ?!

https://southfront.org/new-israeli-missile-strike
-on-syria-locations-details-casualties /

Who needs this technology if politics does not have enough brain to use ....

[Bell pepper]

additional news: ASAD moved all its aircraft from Damascus to Khmeimim:
photo from the satellite with evidence can be found here:

https://twitter.com/obretix

probably expect a new blow!

[Olegi1]

You see, friend,

Russia has a slightly larger territory than Bulgaria, we have climates from the desert to permafrost. And our technology (that military, that civilian) should work everywhere. Hence the requirements for such a technique.

As for Assad, Russia has never declared that it is fighting for this particular person. Our goals are different, they are spelled out everywhere, Yandex to help.

[Lord of the Sith]

And how many launchers are included in the brigade complex? 16 pu?

[NKT]

24 BM, three batteries per division, two divisions per brigade. The same structure for the "wasp" is characteristic. In the regiments (in the USSR) there were 16 BM., Sometimes 8 BM tori and 8 BM - wasps.

[RASKAT]

In this regard, I will criticize a little our leadership of the Army and analyze it.
First of all, why the choice fell on the Torah. This complex mainly performs the tasks of covering the troops on the March, mainly tank and motorized units from aerodynamic targets. Is he needed in the Arctic, are we planning to advance there with tank divisions? And from whom to defend themselves, who in their right mind will attack there and on what? Anyway.
If we set the task of protecting objects and building an air defense group, it would not be easier to put on the Vityaz base, for example, Buk-M3 and its range in reach and, most importantly, in height is much greater than that of Tor and Shell, and the whole range of capabilities is incomparably better. It’s not entirely clear to me to fight what goals in the Arctic are buying a whole team of Toors?

[kpd]

It’s easier on the Torah to realize rocket heating.

[Alex777]

It’s not entirely clear to me to fight what goals in the Arctic are buying a whole team of Toors?

You do not understand military affairs at all. Where does the main direction of strike by cruise missiles on the territory of Russia come from? From North. A couple of months ago, 2 American nuclear submarines surfaced in the ice. Why did they come up there? For rehearsal striking cruise missiles. On conventional submarines there are not many ~ 12. But on the converted Ohio - 154 pcs. And such Ohio - 4 pcs. Multiply.
Catching the S-300 / S-400 is inappropriate. These missiles are also expensive to use for other purposes. At the price / quality / quantity for the defeat of the Kyrgyz Republic Armor and Torah are best suited. And to arrange them in the right places is easier, and the number / price of missiles - are best suited. Beech M-3 can also fight well with the Kyrgyz Republic, but it is more expensive, more complicated and its quantity is small so far.

[RASKAT]

Where does the main direction of strike by cruise missiles on the territory of Russia come from? From the north.

For what purposes will they (USA) shoot in the north? In Norilsk or Khatanga? The nearest cities with significant infrastructure and factories are three thousand to the south (see map), Tomogavki will not reach. But here are some B-52 that will fly through the north pole, we just knock C-400. Yes, and the same Buk is capable of shooting down high-altitude and ballistic targets, unlike the Thors and the Carapace.

[Alex777]

So look at the map. This is the range from the Black Sea of ​​our missiles. From the North, both Peter and Moscow will fall under undress without question. The range of ours and American is about the same. At nuclear - even more.
http://newsland.com/user/4296735949/content/realn
aia-zona-porazheniia-rossiiskikh-krylatykh-raket /
4765955
Here are some more maps. The names on them are the locations of the mine installations. KR from 2600 km - get it.
http://voprosik.net/kak-rossiya-otvetit-na-pro-ss
ha /

[Alex777]

https://www.liveinternet.ru/users/4768613/post351
674563 /

[Hunter 2]

I am glad that I will see the Victory Parade live !!! I’ll take the “small one,” and take a look at this car!

[dvina71]

And I’m most likely going to the Patriot Park .. I’m definitely not allowed to go to the truck in Moscow ..

[BZTM]

And I will be in the steppe ...Who studied what .............. Enjoy viewing the Victory Parade ....

[andron-30]

happy for you, no matter how, with the upcoming Great Victory Day

[andron-30]

yapping non-state dedicated to you.

[san4es]

Quote: Anti-Rasism

SHORT ABOUT FISHERS,

... Cognitive ... Not even you will see here

[moreman78]

Quote: NKT

24 BM, three batteries per division, two divisions per brigade. The same structure for the "wasp" is characteristic. In the regiments (in the USSR) there were 16 BM., Sometimes 8 BM tori and 8 BM - wasps.

Sometimes it's better to chew than talk!

[nikoliski]

The maximum speed is 10 km in height, is it not enough against modern aviation? (Americans flew 15 km in Iraq) Or, we’ll just put the “soul” on about 10 Arctic kilometers, which are now uncovered except for patrol MiG-000s ​​from Kotlas and SF ships (and then not in winter and mainly in the Barents Sea)?

[yaaazzz]

First of all, Tor is the protection of the object from axes, medium and long-range air defense systems operate on aviation. Only strategists can fly through our northern borders. So it is Thor who is needed there.

[nikoliski]

Well, look, let's do a simple calculation, reach 12 km, that is, one air defense system closes the strip of 24 kilometers, it turns out if we order about 500 pieces, then by and large we close the border (I do not mean more than 60 thousand kilometers of the border, but the territory from the Kola Peninsula to Kamchatka inclusive) Still I think the S-400 with a range of interception of low-missile missiles of 60 km would be more effective because of the versatility of interception (everything that flies from 10 meters to 35 kilometers in height) simply because if we assume that B- 52 will release the tomahawks at an altitude of 11 km and they will simply fly over the torus batteries that will not reach them (if you make a layered defense, then 500 tori will be few then)

[Andrey57]

Axes cannot fly for 11km for a long time - too much noticeability at a relatively low speed - that's why Toram will also close the "path" from the Barents Sea. And there is also a base on Franz Josef Land, there, too, probably, not only the locator will stand.

[nikoliski]

By the way, what about tori in opposing active interference? The S-400 counteracts them very simply - a missile with a range of 400 km knocks down an REB aircraft before it enters the zone for successfully suppressing our radars in all ranges) What if an electronic warfare plane that puts active radio jamming and a second aircraft from above is sent in front of the tomahawks 15 km streaming foil (millions of dipole reflectors) that will “fly” from this altitude to the ground for hours, under such a cover while the radars are blinded, the tomahawks will jump anywhere, I think I need the S-400, and the torus is the sight of covering the columns from the thunderbolts , it’s not designed for more ... (hundreds of ways can be figured out how to get around them until the submarine lands the fur seals, who find the tori, are shot from grenade launchers and in the defensive defense zone there is a gap through which at ultra-low altitudes with envelope relief " "B1 and B2 dive from the Arctic, in general, the side starting a war often has an advantage precisely because of such nuances (as was the case in 41, when our aviation un destroyed at the airdromes, and saboteurs destroyed everything we could, depriving the tank divisions of communications and we lost over half of the 26000 tanks over the summer, and they were often just thrown into the environment, losing fuel and communication with the command)

[Dead hand]

Quote: Vard

Yes, it’s swimming ... and it can even shoot from the water ... moreover ... if everyone is lost! tracks retains the ability to move ...

)))) how interesting he does it) ??? ... without gusli)))

[Dead hand]

they would be better running ... this shitty full.

[Dietmar]

A good thing!