Military Review

Immediately brigade kit. Arctic version of the air defense system "Tor-M2DT" will enter the army until November

32
The short-range Tor-M2DT brigade complex of the short-range anti-aircraft missile system to perform tasks in the Arctic is planned to be delivered to the troops until November, Interfax reports, citing a military source.


Immediately brigade kit. Arctic version of the air defense system "Tor-M2DT" will enter the army until November


State tests of the Tor-M2DT air defense system should be completed in the first half of this year.

Top-M2DT is an arctic version of the Top-M2 complex mounted on DT-30 two-link track-type conveyors.

These complexes have a unique maneuverability, can overcome ditches, swim, do not lose their performance in the 50-degree frost. The 16 complex consists of vertical-launch anti-aircraft missiles with a range of damage up to 12 km and an altitude range up to 10 thousands of meters
- Reported earlier in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

The air defense missile system is capable of simultaneously firing at four air targets attacking from various directions.

Former commander of the North fleet Russian Federation Nikolai Evmenov said that the combat capabilities of the troops stationed in the Arctic will be increased.

Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vard
    Vard April 30 2018 18: 51
    +4
    But we seem to be ahead of the rest in this matter ... and it pleases ...
    1. Hire
      Hire April 30 2018 19: 02
      +6
      Interestingly, can he work afloat?
      1. Vard
        Vard April 30 2018 19: 32
        +3
        Yes, it’s swimming ... and it can even shoot from the water ... moreover ... if everyone is lost! tracks retains the ability to move ...
      2. Xfgfq
        Xfgfq April 30 2018 19: 41
        +2
        Quote: Hire
        Interestingly, can he work afloat?

        Not only! He can dive into the water, sink all submarines, and then fly into outer space, shoot down all enemy satellites and land right away at the parade on Red Square wassat
        1. 72jora72
          72jora72 1 May 2018 04: 16
          +3
          Not only! He can dive into the water, drown all submarines, and then fly into outer space, shoot down all enemy satellites and land right away at the parade on wassat red square
          Humorist? Petrosyan humoresque did not try to write?
          1. 76rtbr
            76rtbr 1 May 2018 09: 08
            +2
            but he doesn’t try to say something and writes !! he has such a share, SHARE !!!
      3. Bell pepper
        Bell pepper 1 May 2018 02: 20
        +3
        You always write about your advanced technologies in rocket science and air defense systems, etc. etc.
        Horsho, I agree that this is so.

        BUT WHERE ARE THEY WHEN YOU NEED??

        Israel bombed Syria again, Russian air defense systems are again silent !.
        Russian generals too ?!

        https://southfront.org/new-israeli-missile-strike
        -on-syria-locations-details-casualties /

        Who needs this technology if politics does not have enough brain to use ....
        1. Bell pepper
          Bell pepper 1 May 2018 02: 27
          +1
          additional news: ASAD moved all its aircraft from Damascus to Khmeimim:
          photo from the satellite with evidence can be found here:

          https://twitter.com/obretix

          probably expect a new blow!
        2. Olegi1
          Olegi1 1 May 2018 20: 34
          0
          You see, friend,

          Russia has a slightly larger territory than Bulgaria, we have climates from the desert to permafrost. And our technology (that military, that civilian) should work everywhere. Hence the requirements for such a technique.

          As for Assad, Russia has never declared that it is fighting for this particular person. Our goals are different, they are spelled out everywhere, Yandex to help.
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith April 30 2018 19: 26
      +1
      And how many launchers are included in the brigade complex? 16 pu?
      1. NKT
        NKT April 30 2018 21: 20
        +6
        24 BM, three batteries per division, two divisions per brigade. The same structure for the "wasp" is characteristic. In the regiments (in the USSR) there were 16 BM., Sometimes 8 BM tori and 8 BM - wasps.
    3. RASKAT
      RASKAT April 30 2018 21: 59
      +3
      In this regard, I will criticize a little our leadership of the Army and analyze it.
      First of all, why the choice fell on the Torah. This complex mainly performs the tasks of covering the troops on the March, mainly tank and motorized units from aerodynamic targets. Is he needed in the Arctic, are we planning to advance there with tank divisions? And from whom to defend themselves, who in their right mind will attack there and on what? Anyway.
      If we set the task of protecting objects and building an air defense group, it would not be easier to put on the Vityaz base, for example, Buk-M3 and its range in reach and, most importantly, in height is much greater than that of Tor and Shell, and the whole range of capabilities is incomparably better. It’s not entirely clear to me to fight what goals in the Arctic are buying a whole team of Toors?
      1. kpd
        kpd April 30 2018 23: 05
        +1
        It’s easier on the Torah to realize rocket heating.
      2. Alex777
        Alex777 1 May 2018 21: 44
        +1
        It’s not entirely clear to me to fight what goals in the Arctic are buying a whole team of Toors?

        You do not understand military affairs at all. Where does the main direction of strike by cruise missiles on the territory of Russia come from? From North. A couple of months ago, 2 American nuclear submarines surfaced in the ice. Why did they come up there? For rehearsal striking cruise missiles. On conventional submarines there are not many ~ 12. But on the converted Ohio - 154 pcs. And such Ohio - 4 pcs. Multiply.
        Catching the S-300 / S-400 is inappropriate. These missiles are also expensive to use for other purposes. At the price / quality / quantity for the defeat of the Kyrgyz Republic Armor and Torah are best suited. And to arrange them in the right places is easier, and the number / price of missiles - are best suited. Beech M-3 can also fight well with the Kyrgyz Republic, but it is more expensive, more complicated and its quantity is small so far. hi
        1. RASKAT
          RASKAT 1 May 2018 22: 05
          +1
          Where does the main direction of strike by cruise missiles on the territory of Russia come from? From the north.

          For what purposes will they (USA) shoot in the north? In Norilsk or Khatanga? The nearest cities with significant infrastructure and factories are three thousand to the south (see map), Tomogavki will not reach. But here are some B-52 that will fly through the north pole, we just knock C-400. Yes, and the same Buk is capable of shooting down high-altitude and ballistic targets, unlike the Thors and the Carapace.
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 2 May 2018 15: 51
            0
            So look at the map. This is the range from the Black Sea of ​​our missiles. From the North, both Peter and Moscow will fall under undress without question. The range of ours and American is about the same. At nuclear - even more.
            http://newsland.com/user/4296735949/content/realn
            aia-zona-porazheniia-rossiiskikh-krylatykh-raket /
            4765955
            Here are some more maps. The names on them are the locations of the mine installations. KR from 2600 km - get it.
            http://voprosik.net/kak-rossiya-otvetit-na-pro-ss
            ha /
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 2 May 2018 16: 03
              0
              https://www.liveinternet.ru/users/4768613/post351
              674563 /
  2. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 April 30 2018 18: 51
    +10
    I am glad that I will see the Victory Parade live !!! I’ll take the “small one,” and take a look at this car! good
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 April 30 2018 19: 05
      +3
      And I’m most likely going to the Patriot Park .. I’m definitely not allowed to go to the truck in Moscow ..
      1. BZTM
        BZTM April 30 2018 19: 11
        +7
        And I will be in the steppe ...Who studied what .............. Enjoy viewing the Victory Parade ....
    2. andron-30
      andron-30 April 30 2018 19: 07
      +2
      happy for you, no matter how, with the upcoming Great Victory Day
  3. andron-30
    andron-30 April 30 2018 19: 02
    +1
    yapping non-state dedicated to you.
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. san4es
      san4es April 30 2018 21: 08
      +7
      Quote: Anti-Rasism
      SHORT ABOUT FISHERS,

      ... Cognitive ... Not even you will see here bully
  5. moreman78
    moreman78 April 30 2018 23: 28
    +1
    Quote: NKT
    24 BM, three batteries per division, two divisions per brigade. The same structure for the "wasp" is characteristic. In the regiments (in the USSR) there were 16 BM., Sometimes 8 BM tori and 8 BM - wasps.

    Sometimes it's better to chew than talk!
  6. nikoliski
    nikoliski 1 May 2018 05: 39
    0
    The maximum speed is 10 km in height, is it not enough against modern aviation? (Americans flew 15 km in Iraq) Or, we’ll just put the “soul” on about 10 Arctic kilometers, which are now uncovered except for patrol MiG-000s ​​from Kotlas and SF ships (and then not in winter and mainly in the Barents Sea)?
    1. yaaazzz
      yaaazzz 1 May 2018 08: 27
      +2
      First of all, Tor is the protection of the object from axes, medium and long-range air defense systems operate on aviation. Only strategists can fly through our northern borders. So it is Thor who is needed there.
      1. nikoliski
        nikoliski 1 May 2018 10: 16
        -1
        Well, look, let's do a simple calculation, reach 12 km, that is, one air defense system closes the strip of 24 kilometers, it turns out if we order about 500 pieces, then by and large we close the border (I do not mean more than 60 thousand kilometers of the border, but the territory from the Kola Peninsula to Kamchatka inclusive) Still I think the S-400 with a range of interception of low-missile missiles of 60 km would be more effective because of the versatility of interception (everything that flies from 10 meters to 35 kilometers in height) simply because if we assume that B- 52 will release the tomahawks at an altitude of 11 km and they will simply fly over the torus batteries that will not reach them (if you make a layered defense, then 500 tori will be few then)
        1. Andrey57
          Andrey57 3 May 2018 07: 59
          0
          Axes cannot fly for 11km for a long time - too much noticeability at a relatively low speed - that's why Toram will also close the "path" from the Barents Sea. And there is also a base on Franz Josef Land, there, too, probably, not only the locator will stand.
          1. nikoliski
            nikoliski 3 May 2018 09: 00
            -1
            By the way, what about tori in opposing active interference? The S-400 counteracts them very simply - a missile with a range of 400 km knocks down an REB aircraft before it enters the zone for successfully suppressing our radars in all ranges) What if an electronic warfare plane that puts active radio jamming and a second aircraft from above is sent in front of the tomahawks 15 km streaming foil (millions of dipole reflectors) that will “fly” from this altitude to the ground for hours, under such a cover while the radars are blinded, the tomahawks will jump anywhere, I think I need the S-400, and the torus is the sight of covering the columns from the thunderbolts , it’s not designed for more ... (hundreds of ways can be figured out how to get around them until the submarine lands the fur seals, who find the tori, are shot from grenade launchers and in the defensive defense zone there is a gap through which at ultra-low altitudes with envelope relief " "B1 and B2 dive from the Arctic, in general, the side starting a war often has an advantage precisely because of such nuances (as was the case in 41, when our aviation un destroyed at the airdromes, and saboteurs destroyed everything we could, depriving the tank divisions of communications and we lost over half of the 26000 tanks over the summer, and they were often just thrown into the environment, losing fuel and communication with the command)
  7. Dead hand
    Dead hand 1 May 2018 15: 15
    0
    Quote: Vard
    Yes, it’s swimming ... and it can even shoot from the water ... moreover ... if everyone is lost! tracks retains the ability to move ...

    )))) how interesting he does it) ??? ... without gusli)))
  8. Dead hand
    Dead hand 1 May 2018 15: 17
    0
    they would be better running ... this shitty full.
  9. Dietmar
    Dietmar 1 May 2018 22: 10
    0
    A good thing!