Military Review

The submarine "Prince Vladimir" will give the fleet in 2019 year

31
The Russian fleet will receive the Prince Vladimir nuclear-powered submarine carrier of the Borey-A project in 2019, reports TASS a message from the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy for armaments, Vice Admiral Viktor Bursuk


The submarine "Prince Vladimir" will give the fleet in 2019 year


Initially, the submarine delivery was planned for 2017 year, then this term was moved to 2018 year.

Yes (on 2019). The ship will have an extended set of tests, including those that were not previously conducted,
said bursuk.

He added that "the fleet must receive a ship that is fully ready to carry out tasks for its intended purpose."

Recall, strategic rocket carrier "Prince Vladimir" was laid in 2012 year and launched in November 2017. He became the fourth submarine in a series of eight "Boreev" and the first representative of the improved project "Borey-A."

The Prince Oleg, the Generalissimus Suvorov submarines (laid out in 2014 year), Emperor Alexander III (2015) and Prince Pozharsky (2016) are currently under construction.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Tarasve
    Tarasve April 26 2018 12: 49
    +4
    God grant that the tests pass regularly. A very necessary combat unit for our Navy. And other boats at what stage of construction, who knows?
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov April 26 2018 12: 58
      0
      Nuclear submarine "Prince Vladimir", I think stuffed with all the most modern weapons and stuffing!
      A thunderstorm of Anglo-Saxons should be! Well, God forbid ... soldier
      "The fleet must receive a ship that is fully prepared to carry out its mission."

      The main thing to be in time!
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 April 26 2018 13: 55
        +2
        Nuclear submarine "Prince Vladimir", I think stuffed with all the most modern weapons and stuffing! ... The main thing is to catch it!

        I have to disagree with you. The mace's problem is in the container in which it is placed in the mine. In Borea-B, which should replace, there should already be no container. Only then can these missile carriers be guaranteed to launch the entire ammunition.
        Now, at launch, both the missile body and the launch container body in places unpredictable from case to case, are deformed. These deformations do not always correspond to mine tolerances. Therefore, on the current Boreas, the Mace can fly, or it can self-destruct. And there is no other option to solve this problem, except how to get rid of the TPK inherited from Topol. So there’s nowhere to hurry. Borey-B has so far been wrapped up for revision at a cost. hi
        1. jjj
          jjj April 26 2018 17: 26
          +2
          When loading missiles at 941 Ave., two special cranes were built. I had to mill there
        2. Vitaly Anisimov
          Vitaly Anisimov April 26 2018 17: 29
          0
          Quote: Alex777
          These deformations do not always correspond to mine tolerances. Therefore, on the current Boreas, the Mace can fly, or it can self-destruct. And there is no other option to solve this problem, otherwise how to get rid

          It is clear that our entire fleet is better to liquidate and purchase from the USA .. ha ha ha
          Now the order will go through open communication, so that all pop up and give up to hell with dogs .. Alex 777 said that nothing flies with us, etc. ..End of communication men! angry
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 April 26 2018 22: 44
            +1
            Semen Semenych! Well, am I glad?
            I'm waiting for Borey-B to appear. It will be calmer. hi
    2. Tiksi-3
      Tiksi-3 April 26 2018 12: 58
      +5
      Quote: TarasVE
      And other boats at what stage of construction, who knows?

      Do you know at what stage this boat ??? .... laughing wassat laughing
    3. 210ox
      210ox April 26 2018 12: 58
      +3
      This missile carrier is very needed at the Pacific Fleet ..
      Quote: TarasVE
      God grant that the tests pass regularly. A very necessary combat unit for our Navy. And other boats at what stage of construction, who knows?
  2. BZTM
    BZTM April 26 2018 12: 50
    +10
    Seven feet to you, "Prince Vladimir" !!!
    Currently under construction are the submarines “Prince Oleg”, “Generalissimo Suvorov” (laid down in 2014), “Emperor Alexander III” (2015) and “Prince Pozharsky” (2016). !!!!!
    Although they wrote something pleasant today, thank you! This is sincerely !!!
    1. Ryazan87
      Ryazan87 April 26 2018 12: 57
      +7
      And what is pleasant? The change was postponed for a year.
      1. Tiksi-3
        Tiksi-3 April 26 2018 12: 59
        +9
        Quote: Ryazanets87
        And what is pleasant? The change was postponed for a year.

        2 years moved .... read carefully ... and far from the fact that has not yet been shifted
        1. Ryazan87
          Ryazan87 April 26 2018 13: 20
          +2
          I am an attentive person.
          "Initially, the delivery of the submarine was planned for 2017 yearthen this deadline was moved on 2018 year."
          "The Russian fleet will receive the nuclear submarine rocket carrier Prince Vladimir of the Borey-A project in 2019 year"
          A total of two, but since April 2018, plans for 2017 are history. It's important that more shifted for a year.
          And yes, I agree that there are no guarantees regarding the absence of further shifts.
      2. BZTM
        BZTM April 26 2018 12: 59
        +8
        What is pleasant? What they didn’t completely forget and score on the Fleet — they are doing something to the best of their modest forces using the funds that remained from being taken offshore and cut in place ... And thanks for that ... wink
      3. NEXUS
        NEXUS April 26 2018 13: 11
        +8
        Quote: Ryazanets87
        And what is pleasant? The change was postponed for a year.

        And in your opinion, is it better to take an untested RPKSN and then correct sores and shortcomings during operation? This, if you have forgotten, is one of the components of the nuclear triad, and the most effective one.
        1. Ryazan87
          Ryazan87 April 26 2018 13: 26
          +9
          In my opinion, it is better to fulfill the obligations undertaken on time. And do not disgrace later.
          The shifts measured over the years are a grandiose pr..b, especially with regard to the nuclear triad. At this rate, it will become a nuclear duet.
          From the experience of my work, I can notice that the shift in terms usually speaks of all sorts of unpleasant things: marriage, poor-quality components, design errors.
          And for these problems should and must be asked. In this case, in the criminal law aspect.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS April 26 2018 13: 33
            +6
            Quote: Ryazanets87
            And do not disgrace then

            And what is the shame? We are not only pushing the deadlines, but the same mattresses too.
            Quote: Ryazanets87
            Shifts measured in years

            And the creation of a new SSBN is not the creation of a stapler for paper ... And the same Borey-A differs from Borey in the same way as two different submarines in general.
            Quote: Ryazanets87
            From the experience of my work, I can notice that the shift in terms usually speaks of all sorts of unpleasant things: marriage, poor-quality components, design errors.

            Debugging all systems is also not a matter of a couple of hours. And you need to understand that at Borey-A, the technologies that will be applied in the Borey-B project are already being tested.
            Quote: Ryazanets87
            And for these problems should and must be asked. In this case, in the criminal law aspect.

            And then let’s transplant all the designers ... So for 30 years we’ve been sitting with their seats, they’ve not done horseradish, but then take out and put the new SSBN at will. Nothing that our shipbuilding just comes out of a coma? And the fact that the fleet is financed by the residual sign is where?
            1. Ryazan87
              Ryazan87 April 26 2018 13: 53
              +9
              "And what is the shame?"
              Officials publicly declare something in the spirit of Rakhmanov "we hope that we will hand over .. in August .. ee. 2018. But this is not accurate."
              The problems of the US Navy are their problems. In the end, they can afford it.
              "And the creation of a new SSBN is not the creation of a paper stapler ..."
              Without a doubt. Consequently, the dates must be voiced real, so as not to bleat then with a pale look about "trials that no one has yet conducted." The words of an official must have weight and meaning. Roughly speaking, "one must answer for the bazaar."
              "And then let's transplant all the designers ..."
              I think a much better effect will be provided by checking budget spending + checking suppliers and contractors. At the same time, the Ministry of Defense hinted that making 150 corrections to the project during the construction process and showing "savings" is a direct path to Ivan Gren.
  3. Magic archer
    Magic archer April 26 2018 12: 51
    +2
    The good news! I wonder how much Borey A will differ from the first missile carriers?
    1. Tiksi-3
      Tiksi-3 April 26 2018 13: 01
      +5
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Good news!

      belay so that they have shifted by 2 years ?? ... is this good news? wassat
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer April 26 2018 13: 04
        +1
        The good news is that even if we are late, we are building! If you compare it with the same destroyers that remain on paper, the news is EXCELLENT !!!
        1. Tiksi-3
          Tiksi-3 April 26 2018 13: 26
          +3
          Quote: Magic Archer
          If you compare with the same destroyers,

          and Th not with sausage .... it is produced daily? fool
          Quote: Magic Archer
          The good news is that even with a delay, let’s build!

          Grena build a generation of builders .... the same good news ??? belay
          Quote: Magic Archer
          Clearly explained ?!

          what? explained? .... you on flood and no more
      2. dvina71
        dvina71 April 26 2018 13: 26
        +2
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        so that they have shifted by 2 years ?? ... is this good news?

        Than tryndet .. Wellcome to us on the NSR ... There are not enough workers ... there isn’t enough up to 600 people .. pull yourself up .. show how to quickly build an SSBN.
        1. Tiksi-3
          Tiksi-3 April 26 2018 13: 44
          +5
          Quote: dvina71
          show how to quickly build an SSBN.

          Uncle Petya you .... ?? I said that I can quickly build ?? fool , I wrote that words must be answered - by deed! - on time specified in the contract !!! and no more, and when they shift one-two-three-this is a trend and it needs a criminal code on the head ... everything from hard workers to relatives of the directorate! so with your scarce places you can pass me by negative
          PS NSR is the Northern Sea Route or is it an SMP bank ?? .... and where is it to you in Anadyr? ... thanks ....
          1. dvina71
            dvina71 April 26 2018 13: 54
            +2
            No. ..this is a northern shipping company .. You don’t even know where these nuclear submarines are being built .., and with a clever look rants about the deadlines .. For me, let them shift as much as necessary .... if only not like with Kursk. .
            1. Tiksi-3
              Tiksi-3 April 26 2018 14: 08
              +4
              Quote: dvina71
              You don’t even know where these nuclear submarines are being built.

              belay lol
              Quote: dvina71
              it is a northern shipping company.

              laughing Sevmash is a northern machine-building enterprise recourse and what is being built in the shipping company I can guess
              Quote: dvina71
              For me, let them shift as much as necessary .... if only

              if only s / n were paid and the order would be eternal .... everything is clear with you ...
              Quote: dvina71
              if only not as with Kursk ..

              are the builders of Kursk to blame? belay ... then compare with Chernobyl .... the logic is the same
      3. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith April 26 2018 13: 55
        0
        Because the first of a new series.
        1. Tiksi-3
          Tiksi-3 April 26 2018 14: 10
          +3
          Quote: Sith Lord
          Because the first of a new series.

          maybe because they build from scratch, and not like the previous ones, from unfinished submarines?
          1. Lord of the Sith
            Lord of the Sith April 26 2018 14: 31
            0
            Perhaps you see in the test they added new ones.
    2. san4es
      san4es April 26 2018 14: 39
      +1
      Quote: Magic Archer
      ... how much will Borey differ from the first missile carriers?

      hi Compared to its predecessors, the modernized Boreas boast improved acoustics and low noise levels, as well as a number of other technical improvements. After commissioning, Prince Vladimir will be the most advanced Russian submarine with nuclear missiles on board.
  4. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 April 26 2018 13: 50
    +2
    The submarine missile carrier should be 100% full, it’s better to delay it a bit with the adoption of armaments than to fix something later and redo it, or even worse ...........
  5. gig334
    gig334 April 26 2018 13: 59
    +4
    In my opinion even cheers patriots with their heads turned off start to rage, from the annual postponement of the deadlines. And also from the long-term construction of ships, to build frigates and corvettes for 5-10 years, this is insanity. And the business husk has one excuse, it’s better to delay the reception than to redo it later. For the lines that build them, you can already rebuild the whole fleet from scratch, and check them all ten times and find flaws ten times. China has won several destroyers and submarines in two years, and built an aircraft carrier in 4 years. And our frigate Gorshkov has been under construction for more than 5 years, and when the modernization of the cruiser is completed, it is generally unclear how the delivery of this submarine is. About the construction of new destroyers and cruisers in general, you can forget, with the budget that we have allocated for the army, only small missile ships to build, and even then for 5-10 years.