Military Review

"A new Cold War has begun." From a speech by the UN Secretary General

67
22 April 2018 can be called the official date of recognition that the 2.0 Cold War is going on in the world. This recognition was made by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. According to the Secretary General, it is necessary to state the fact of the return of the Cold War in the current realities.


From the text of the UN Secretary General's speech:
It is clear that the Cold War is back. But now the United States and Russia cannot control everyone, as it was before (with the United States and the USSR). Many countries are very active in the Middle East: Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and others. There are no two homogeneous blocks controlled by the two countries.


"A new Cold War has begun." From a speech by the UN Secretary General


At the same time, the UN Secretary General made a frank admission regarding the role of the United Nations itself. According to Guterrish, the United Nations in such circumstances is not able to stop conflicts, including the conflict in Syria. Moreover, the UN Secretary General acknowledged the ineffectiveness of the Security Council.

Guterres:
In the UN Security Council there is a situation in which this body does not correspond to modern realities. There is an imbalance of power.
Photos used:
russia-now.com
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. gippernano
    gippernano April 23 2018 06: 11
    +10
    The guy signed that he is unsuitable, and as they usually show off
    1. lwxx
      lwxx April 23 2018 06: 15
      +39
      Rather, they are setting the stage for the dissolution of the UN and the formation of a new instrument of international relations, where Russia will not have a chance to influence anything.
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee April 23 2018 06: 29
        +14
        The UN was created with the participation of the Stalinist USSR and had influence and weight, but what can happen in return for the UN? Question....
        1. Ushly_bashkort
          Ushly_bashkort April 23 2018 06: 46
          +31
          Nothing, According to overseas "partners", all problems in the world should be solved by NATO. Actually, they have already scored on this very UN and are not going to observe anything there. League of Nations v2.0.
          1. Uncle lee
            Uncle lee April 23 2018 06: 52
            +3
            Quote: Ushly_bashkort
            should decide NATO

            There is no Russia in NATO! And they married me without me!
            1. Ushly_bashkort
              Ushly_bashkort April 23 2018 06: 54
              +6
              Why do they need Russia in NATO? In their understanding, such a country should not exist in the future.
              1. Uncle lee
                Uncle lee April 23 2018 06: 57
                +6
                Here they are mistaken - NATO should not be! About NATO member countries, while I am silent!
                1. Teberii
                  Teberii April 23 2018 07: 55
                  0
                  And who asked brought to this. It's too late.
                2. Semen1972
                  Semen1972 April 23 2018 13: 20
                  +2
                  Quote: Uncle Lee
                  Here they are mistaken - NATO should not be!

                  For Zhirinovsky it was necessary to vote .. in 6 years the current liberal will leave and we’ll hit the very tomatoes !!!!!
                  1. Tartar
                    Tartar April 23 2018 15: 19
                    +1
                    Quote: Semen1972
                    It was necessary to vote for Zhirinovsky .. nothing will happen in 6 years to the current liberal ...

                    Is the leader of a liberal democratic party not a liberal?
                    1. Semen1972
                      Semen1972 April 24 2018 12: 08
                      0
                      Quote: TarTar
                      Is the leader of a liberal democratic party not a liberal?

                      Of course not!!! You are in Russia, here are your own concepts of liberalism, etc. Zhirinovsky is as liberal as an oppositionist! No, he’s a man of cool words (he didn’t see any solutions). Here's what we need - to defeat all the enemies and build a bright future within the planet Earth. Only Zhirinovsky is capable of this !!!
        2. Ross_ulair
          Ross_ulair April 23 2018 08: 19
          +3
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          The UN was created with the participation of the Stalinist USSR and had influence and weight, but what can happen in return for the UN? Question....

          The League of Nations was also created for the sake of peace on Earth.
          How it ended - we all know ...
        3. mkop
          mkop April 23 2018 08: 42
          +7
          And I believe that the UN, even in Stalin's times, had no weight, and did not decide anything. At that time, the presence of a counterbalance for the USA in the person of the USSR was decisive, but certainly not some kind of UN.
          1. Romka47
            Romka47 April 23 2018 13: 54
            +1
            I also think so, + your koment
        4. NEXUS
          NEXUS April 23 2018 09: 58
          +3
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          The UN was created with the participation of the Stalinist USSR and had influence and weight, but what can happen in return for the UN? Question....

          In exchange, a controlled and more obedient instrument may appear in the hands of the USA, which will issue "approvals" for all actions of NATO and the USA in particular. Another question is where China, S. Korea, us and a number of countries that are against US policy will go. It is possible that we and all the listed countries will be invited to this organization, but on the basis of substantially reduced rights than we have at the UN. That is, we will no longer have a veto. In other words, with the rights and opportunities to influence the decisions of this organization on the principle that your place is sixth, sit and do not speak.
          1. Semen1972
            Semen1972 April 26 2018 10: 29
            0
            Quote: NEXUS
            Another question is where China, S. Korea, us and a number of countries that are against US policy will go.

            China is a neutral country, it is the main partner of the United States. Against we, North Korea, Bolivia, Venezuela ... that is, where the ruler is a monarch, whose people do not care and bored decided to climb the world to oppose the United States.
      2. Evil543
        Evil543 April 23 2018 07: 40
        +2
        Quote: lwxx
        Rather, they are setting the stage for the dissolution of the UN and the formation of a new instrument of international relations, where Russia will not have a chance to influence anything.


        Then we are talking about the dissolution of the Security Council, they want to force us out of there
    2. Chertt
      Chertt April 23 2018 06: 23
      +8
      Why do we think that the Cold War began between Russia and the United States. And HV USA - China-India. India-Pakistan-China. Yes, you can go on forever. There is a process of "collapse of Hegemon", and in this situation, "each for himself", with the creation of situational unions
      1. Alexander 3
        Alexander 3 April 23 2018 06: 37
        +4
        That's for sure, every country is missing something and trying to solve their problems at the expense of other countries. Well, in our country there is everything, and therefore there are so many claims to our country.
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich April 23 2018 06: 42
        +1
        Clearly, the Cold War is back. But now USA and Russia cannot control everyone, as it was before (from the USA and the USSR)
        in any case, the UN Secretary General, talked about the leading world powers, recognizing Russia as such.
      3. Tank hard
        Tank hard April 23 2018 06: 44
        +1
        We go to the "multipolar" world order.))
        1. Tatar 174
          Tatar 174 April 23 2018 07: 40
          +3
          Quote: Tank Hard
          We go to the "multipolar" world order

          In which no UN can do anything. The United States and some others no longer reckon with the UN, they bomb whoever they want and when they want, and generally do what they want without regard to anyone ...
          1. Semen1972
            Semen1972 April 23 2018 13: 21
            0
            Quote: Tatar 174
            generally do what they want without reckoning with anyone ...

            our bureaucrats remind ... one breed
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov April 23 2018 07: 41
      +4
      And why did this leaky Portuguese diaper not remember the illegal occupation of Syria, the missile attack on a UN member, the special creation of terrorist organizations by the United States. Why does this false convoy Shmara not talk about the causes of this chaos - about the United States, about Britain, about NATO. Silent and sucks, sucks, sucks ... Shame. Our people need to remind him of his official function, otherwise he very well entered the role of a sucking highway share.
      1. V
        V April 23 2018 18: 13
        0
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        He doesn’t talk about the causes of this chaos - about the United States, about Britain, about NATO.

        It's simple: the UN General Assembly is located in New York, New York, USA.
        The head of the United Nations must, a priori, be selected from the permanent states - UN members, of which there are five in number, and which must be changed in turn: each year the next permanent member of the UN, according to the schedule.
        Choosing a chair from
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        lying shmara convoy
        says a lot: Whoever pays for a girl dances her. And, of course, it is necessary to change the current UN headquarters to "neutral territory", unbiased with any permanent state - a UN member. The territory of the largest continent on this planet looks the best.
    4. Skif83
      Skif83 April 23 2018 09: 48
      0
      It is rather an Amer’s pitch.
      They sleep and see how no one in the world points to them and does not threaten their finger ...
  2. Chord
    Chord April 23 2018 06: 13
    +3
    Really just got it? Or discovered ,, scary ,, open secret?
    1. Ushly_bashkort
      Ushly_bashkort April 23 2018 06: 47
      +3
      Just officially announced that the UN is not working and the circus can be closed.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 23 2018 06: 15
    +3
    Clearly, the Cold War is back.
    Has the UN Secretary General finally begun to suspect something?
    this body does not meet modern realities
    But this, in my opinion, is at the suggestion of the Americans, who are sleeping and see reformatting the UN exclusively and irrevocably for themselves, but rather replace it with yourself.
    1. andrson
      andrson April 23 2018 07: 34
      0
      rather, the United States and NATO allies think about how to deny veto power to Russia. They often began to talk and write about it. And we are silent about this.
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 23 2018 06: 23
    +6
    So the cold war did not stop for a day and did not stop, we just naively believed that Europe and the United States would be our friends! Now we realized how much we were mistaken, considering them civilized!
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi April 23 2018 06: 30
      +6
      Quote: Herkulesich
      So the cold war did not stop for a day and did not stop, we just naively believed that Europe and the United States would be our friends! Now we realized how much we were mistaken, considering them civilized!

      The Cold War between various centers of power goes all the way. Just look at the relationship between Rome and the Parthian kingdom, the Byzantine and Holy Roman Empires, Spain and France, England and France, and so on.
      1. krops777
        krops777 April 23 2018 07: 04
        +4
        The Cold War between various centers of power goes all history


        One small detail that this cold war may be the last for humanity.
        1. V
          V April 23 2018 18: 41
          0
          Quote: krops777
          this cold war may be the last for mankind.

          So, categorically, talking about the global atomic "star" is not entirely correct. If, hypothetically, this happens, then even those who survive after a year or two will die like flies from dichlorvos in a year or two.
          The Cold War is the cold one, which is carried out by an indirect conflict of global warring parties, and on the territory and with the help of third states whose resources (suddenly!) Were needed. The difference in the warring parties is only in the fact that from ancient times, our country was in contractual relations with other states, and not in "extortionist" ones, as the Anglo-Saxons regularly demonstrate.
          Indeed, the Cold War did not stop even for a second since the days of the ancient Egyptian priesthood, when the priests (hierophants) usurped the control system of humanity and began to wage, according to their priorities, all currently known wars: Military (military weapons), Gene (genetic - gene weapons, which is carried out through the influence of food and drugs on genetics), Information (media, including economic priorities - “whips”), Ideological (crushing people into religions and faiths, and pushing their foreheads together), Historical (replacing history with a convenient current status) and, ultimately, the most important - Worldview (the main mosaic that is formed in children from birth, which rolls through the information matrix of society, being brought up and becoming mature, in which they were born and brought up, according to local morality and old, human, traditions).
    2. Doliva63
      Doliva63 April 23 2018 08: 19
      +4
      Quote: Herkulesich
      So the cold war did not stop for a day and did not stop, we just naively believed that Europe and the United States would be our friends! Now we realized how much we were mistaken, considering them civilized!

      Well, colleague, only those who were not familiar with the works of the classics could believe in this.
      If we take into account who we are in the “helmsmen”, we can directly say that they deliberately led the country to weakening and collapse for the sake of their own enrichment. drinks
  5. Holsten
    Holsten April 23 2018 06: 27
    +5
    And immediately all questions and suggestions about the use of UN peacekeepers disappear. The question is: who do they work for?
  6. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 23 2018 06: 34
    +6
    According to Guterres, the UN in such conditions is not able to stop conflicts, including the conflict in Syria. Moreover, the UN Secretary General recognized the inefficiency of the Security Council.

    It directly says that it is necessary to change the principles of the UN, or even to reorganize it. I suspect Russia in a new form of such an organization may not have a place. request
  7. Tarasve
    Tarasve April 23 2018 06: 36
    +4
    Of course, the USA is a hegemon, all the rule of the world to give them. Remain silent and obey. Un disperse everyone to the fingernail. The Yankees generally demolishes the tower, they no longer know how to push Russia away. They want to become directors of the globe.
  8. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii April 23 2018 06: 41
    +3
    For a long time, for a long time we have them like a bone in the throat, even if we stand on tiptoe we don’t see it, just the Cold War trend, new economic and political realities with the old sense, as usual alone, as usual altruists, ready to rush headlong to any ... (Nothing passes, they survived, the enemy doesn’t verbally identify the enemy).
  9. Dormidont
    Dormidont April 23 2018 06: 43
    +1
    The United States Department of State of the United States decided to recognize the obvious events of twenty-five years ago. But Phasington has not yet allowed to speak about the beginning of World War III.
  10. 1536
    1536 April 23 2018 06: 47
    +2
    On the agenda is the raider seizure of the UN by the Americans? Then a dictatorship will be established in the world.
  11. Livonetc
    Livonetc April 23 2018 06: 47
    +1
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    The UN was created with the participation of the Stalinist USSR and had influence and weight, but what can happen in return for the UN? Question....

    This question was previously answered by coalitions of countries that won in world wars ...
    And for us, for survival and victory in the next stage, it is necessary to become a technologist and an economic superpower.
  12. samarin1969
    samarin1969 April 23 2018 07: 07
    +1
    "In the UN Security Council there is a situation in which this body does not meet modern realities. There is an unbalanced balance of forces." “Is Antoniu going to be the chairman of the“ liquidation commission ”? ... Directly,“ UN Gorbachev. ”
  13. bald
    bald April 23 2018 07: 10
    +2
    It turns out that the organization is eating bread in vain, and for a long time. The facts are obvious - the fault is in the protocols. To mother’s unit such an organization.
  14. cedar
    cedar April 23 2018 07: 21
    +2
    The foreign policy declared by Washington for the foreseeable future is not a war of peace, i.e. the policy of controlled chaos should be controlled from a single center - this is the unipolar world, against which Putin rebelled.
    Nations with national leaders at the head, national associations and, accordingly, the United Nations Organization in such an entropy-infernal world do not shine. What Secretary General Gutterish transparently and hinted ... See the root, dear.
    Sovereignty. Russia. Putin!
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 April 23 2018 08: 14
      +5
      "Sovereignty. Russia. Putin!"
      Tin! laughing
  15. slavaseven
    slavaseven April 23 2018 07: 35
    +1
    - "We will send materials about violations to the UN, they will be recorded there and they will take action!"
    - “Dear, do you not know that the UN has failed in its tasks and has been reorganized. The participant’s statement was not submitted from you ...
    - "Your mother ....."
  16. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev April 23 2018 08: 15
    +2
    Well, that’s the first step towards the dissolution of the UN Security Council. The guy was not sickly mattresses paid. Gorbachev from the UN.
  17. icant007
    icant007 April 23 2018 08: 29
    +1
    Well, that's the cranks. The end of some kind of world order. If before only the USA could do whatever they wanted. Now everyone will do it.
  18. Nix1986
    Nix1986 April 23 2018 08: 45
    +1
    In this situation, such a body will meet these conditions only if the USA does not enter into it and there will be strict supervision of the council members regarding corruption with the US government. While the dollar rules the world, the United States will always find the right bit for everyone, or carrots, to whom or what.
  19. Operator
    Operator April 23 2018 08: 47
    +2
    Guterres is weak in his knees - the UN from the very beginning was an ineffective organization in relation to the USA, USSR / RF and China, but none of the previous secretaries-general was hysterical about this.

    This is our joint toy, if the Portuguese Guterres thinks otherwise, then he can resign.
  20. steelmaker
    steelmaker April 23 2018 09: 06
    +2
    Until 1941 there was a league of nations when it became ineffective came to war. RUSSIA needs to spit on the UN, all the same, the United States is doing what it wants and uniting under its wing countries that agree to comply with international law, i.e. create block. But this is impossible, because RUSSIA is weak economically. With 0.5% of GDP, even China is in no hurry to fully support Russia. If there is no change of government, things will get worse. Thanks to Stalin for the atomic bomb, otherwise we would have been crushed for a long time.
    1. Nix1986
      Nix1986 April 23 2018 09: 19
      +1
      This is the whole paradox of the situation, the USSR first became the second pole, and only then stood in opposition to the United States. And now we look like a nerd who challenged a boxer, commendable of course, but the outcome is known, but you had to pump up and get ready first and only then challenge.
      1. Roma 1977
        Roma 1977 April 23 2018 13: 37
        +1
        Not certainly in that way. Boxer and nerd have a gun in their pocket. And there is no ring.
        1. Nix1986
          Nix1986 April 23 2018 14: 36
          0
          The gun is the last step, so while the game is muscle and we are losing. 99% will not reach pistols
      2. Weyland
        Weyland April 23 2018 16: 47
        0
        Quote: Nix1986
        And now we look like a nerd who challenged a boxer, commendable of course, but the outcome is known

        Not certainly in that way. And now we look like a lightweight boxer who challenged an anabolic-pumped bodybuilder, so the outcome is still unknown.
        1. Nix1986
          Nix1986 April 23 2018 16: 50
          0
          I will answer as the previous person, until it came to the pistols - everything is sad, at least 100 years blow your cheeks.
  21. Eduard petrov
    Eduard petrov April 23 2018 09: 10
    +1
    They want to deprive the veto. Systematically ached, well ...
  22. dahpaz
    dahpaz April 23 2018 09: 27
    0
    "It is clear that the Cold War has returned. But now the United States and Russia cannot control everyone, as it was before (with the United States and the USSR). Many countries are very active in the Middle East: Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and others. There are no two homogeneous blocks controlled by two countries. "

    The Russian Federation and staff do not control everyone ... since the star-witted ones strive to control everyone and everything unilaterally ... well, Europe ... she is not up to "homogeneous blocks" ... same-sex marriages and the final surrender to savages from Africa and the Middle East is at the front of their ultra liberal agenda. But seriously ... it’s already very doubtful that this “frankness” hides something good for the Russian Federation ... they officially recognize that they are de facto at war (cold or cold ... the essence does not change) AGAINST RUSSIA .. . and they say it would be necessary to consolidate everything "democratic and enlightened" against the evil Russians ... and of course the UN Security Council "does not meet modern realities"
    They say deprive them of their membership in the Security Council and then everything will be modern ...
  23. Old26
    Old26 April 23 2018 09: 55
    +1
    Quote: gippernano
    The guy signed that he is unsuitable, and as they usually show off

    The guy said that everyone has long said that the UN is not capable of anything. And not that he is unsuitable.

    Quote: Uncle Lee
    The UN was created with the participation of the Stalinist USSR and had influence and weight, but what can happen in return for the UN? Question....

    And apparently, even the Secretary General does not know. Everyone needs to understand what needs to be reformed. How - no one knows.

    Quote: mkop
    And I believe that the UN, even in Stalin's times, had no weight, and did not decide anything. At that time, the presence of a counterbalance for the USA in the person of the USSR was decisive, but certainly not some kind of UN.

    In vain you think. The UN played a role, and many conflict situations were resolved within this organization. Moreover, these are not only military solutions, but also solutions to humanitarian problems. And the power of the USA or the USSR did not always and in everything decide. Before the guns spoke, diplomats worked and they performed their functions. But the fact that the UN Security Council now has a stalemate situation is clear. The Western coalition in most cases “bit the bit” when it comes to our proposals. We are accordingly at their suggestions. Veto law gives the opportunity to any document DO NOT ACCEPT. What is desired here is not yet clear. Only one thing is clear - this right cannot be revoked, because it is the “last lever”, but there must be some mechanism in such cases.

    Quote: Andrson
    rather, the United States and NATO allies think about how to deny veto power to Russia. They often began to talk and write about it. And we are silent about this.

    Veto right for the creators of the UN is enshrined in the Charter of the UN itself. Then it is necessary to dissolve the UN, for the dissolution of the Security Council is not provided for in the charter. Even the General Assembly is not able to make such a decision, although there is no Veto right there and the decision is made by a simple majority. But GA decisions are only advisory, not binding. Solving this on the Security Council is impossible in principle. If the proposal is put forward by the troika USA_ France-Britain, then the VETO law will apply either to Russia or China, or rather both countries at once. Again a dead end.

    Quote: krops777
    The Cold War between various centers of power goes all history


    One small detail that this cold war may be the last for humanity.

    Cold just will not be the last. But its transition to hot - yes. After all, what is essentially the Cold War. Sufficiently tense relations between countries, sanctions, the desire to push the enemy country out of the markets where that country dominated. There are no breaks in diplomatic relations, there is nothing else more serious. The treaties are being terminated, the next round of the arms race is underway and countries are beginning to come to the understanding that this is a dead end, it is necessary to come to an agreement, reduce tension, etc. The world, as taught by the MLF, is developing in a spiral. Now is another round of spiral called Cold War 2.0. There will be steps 2.1 or 2.2. Then warming, then again, after some time there will be Cold War 3.0. But who at that time will be centers of power is unknown
  24. jncnfdybr
    jncnfdybr April 23 2018 10: 27
    +1
    Yes, everything goes to the fact that the UN will not. Very much one of the countries of the world wants world domination and unquestioning obedience.)
  25. geniy
    geniy April 23 2018 11: 52
    +2
    I propose introducing some changes in the activities of the UN. Firstly, it is necessary to withdraw the building of this organization from the territory of America to some poorly populated island such as St. Helena or the like. Since now the US State Department directly and arrogantly bribes the members of delegations they need, it simply gives them cars for free use, and probably bribes in other ways. And even more so, the State Department and the CIA are wiretapping all telephone cables from the UN building. Therefore, Russian representatives must constantly raise the question before all delegations about moving the UN building to some other place and another country.
    And also it is necessary to do so in order to equalize the rights of all countries in the world to participate in UN affairs - that is, to introduce equal pay in proportion to the population of each country, and not since 25% are paid by the USA now, they order music.
    Can any of the participants in the discussion have any other suggestions for changing the work of the UN? And how I will formulate my proposals clearly, I’m going to send them to the State Duma of the Russian Federation.
  26. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor April 23 2018 14: 10
    0
    A new round of the Cold War began with the destruction by terrorists of sovereign Yugoslavia, with the connivance of the UN.
  27. Nikolay87
    Nikolay87 April 23 2018 14: 20
    0
    Yes, the UN cannot solve problems, but it is the only organization that SHOULD do this. There are no options.
  28. Oleg Kozlov
    Oleg Kozlov April 23 2018 14: 32
    +1
    The whole world has been talking about this for a long time. Only our politicians still do not believe this.
  29. NordUral
    NordUral April 23 2018 18: 05
    0
    The statement of this comrade with a distant, and maybe not very distant, sight. And on the vizier is Russia's place in the UN.
  30. uporov65
    uporov65 April 23 2018 18: 56
    0
    Obviously, we are not ready to live in a single house. It remains only to scatter over their regional organizations. But even my grandfather said: "It is easier to beat with an edge and dad."