Military Review

Documents for termination of contract with Naftogaz sent to Stockholm Arbitration

93
Today, the Stockholm Arbitration received documents from the Russian company Gazprom, reporting on the procedure for terminating contracts with the Ukrainian Naftogaz. Information citing sources in Gazprom published Gazetoy.ru. From the material:
Today, Gazprom has sent documents to the Stockholm Arbitration to terminate contracts with Naftogaz of Ukraine for the supply of gas and its transit through the territory of the republic. Negotiations with "Naftogaz of Ukraine" did not lead to the result.



Documents for termination of contract with Naftogaz sent to Stockholm Arbitration


We are talking about the negotiations that were recently initiated by Naftogaz itself for the conditions of transit deliveries of Russian gas through Ukraine to Europe after 2019 of the year. It is in 2019 that the current contract, concluded with the participation of the then prime ministers of the two countries, Vladimir Putin and Yulia Tymoshenko, ends. Despite the fact that Ukrainian consumers consistently received and received gas under this contract, which provided for discounts, the signing of the document by Yulia Tymoshenko was once called “a betrayal of national interests” in Kiev. Itself Tymoshenko pleased, as you know, in jail.

The irony of fate can be considered that if Yulia Tymoshenko will once again be in the chair of the prime minister (and even the president) of Ukraine and she will have to sign a new contract with the Russian Federation - already in the new geopolitical realities.

Recall that the current authorities of Ukraine are calling on Europeans to set a barrier for the construction of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline.
Photos used:
Gazprom
93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 20 2018 18: 55
    +13
    We need to publicly disassemble the section of the pipeline for ukroinu for the new 2019 year! So to speak, a gift for Banderloha from the Russian Grandfather Frost! am
    1. Vend
      Vend April 20 2018 18: 56
      +2
      Well, they warned that in 2019 the transit would be closed. Is being done. Who else is there for sanctions and Ukraine in Europe?
      1. Shurik70
        Shurik70 April 20 2018 19: 52
        +3
        And why to the Stockholm court? From which side is he here at all.
        Too many political decisions are made in this Stockholm. Take at least their argument "Russia must pay money to Ukraine, because Ukraine is poor."
        Moscow had to be contacted.
        1. dr.star75
          dr.star75 April 20 2018 20: 04
          +3
          All! ALL of our companies are registered in ovshory, therefore their court decides, and not ours.
          1. Gumma
            Gumma April 20 2018 20: 10
            +6
            Eyny, Michael, Eyny
            1. dr.star75
              dr.star75 April 20 2018 20: 16
              +3
              and her and theirs, one hell! not ours!
              1. Oznob
                Oznob April 20 2018 20: 29
                +5
                her - wrong, her - right.
              2. Nyrobsky
                Nyrobsky April 20 2018 21: 12
                +5
                Quote: dr.star75
                and her and theirs, one hell! not ours!

                The agreement has international status, which provides for the exclusion of forcing the interest of any of the contracting parties. A neutral court in considering these interests seems to be a guarantee of compliance with all signed agreements. In the latter case, the court awarded a fine to Russia for reducing the amount of gas that must pass through the contract through an Ukkai pipe - here they themselves signed. But the fact that the contracted volume itself was delivered to the consumer by other means, bypassing Urkain, gives the right to free themselves, but does not cancel the clause of the agreement that gas in the agreed volume should be delivered through the Urkain gas pipeline system. Most likely, the babosy will have to be given up, but to deal with the Ukrins in future gas supplies is certainly never. A bad lesson for us, a good lesson for the future.
                1. NKT
                  NKT April 20 2018 21: 22
                  +5
                  There is no penalty for non-pumped volumes of gas in the contract, but there is a penalty for unselected volumes by Ukraine.
                  Or + to + or - to -, and then the game went one way.
                2. Nikolai Grek
                  Nikolai Grek April 20 2018 22: 21
                  +5
                  Quote: Nyrobsky
                  Quote: dr.star75
                  and her and theirs, one hell! not ours!

                  The agreement has international status, which provides for the exclusion of forcing the interest of any of the contracting parties. A neutral court in considering these interests seems to be a guarantee of compliance with all signed agreements. In the latter case, the court awarded a fine to Russia for reducing the amount of gas that must pass through the contract through an Ukkai pipe - here they themselves signed. But the fact that the contracted volume itself was delivered to the consumer by other means, bypassing Urkain, gives the right to free themselves, but does not cancel the clause of the agreement that gas in the agreed volume should be delivered through the Urkain gas pipeline system. Most likely, the babosy will have to be given up, but to deal with the Ukrins in future gas supplies is certainly never. A bad lesson for us, a good lesson for the future.

                  oh well ... there really the court radically changed the terms of the contracts, which had serious consequences ... based on the contracts (and not the current from the contracts, but even from common sense), the supplier should have remained in the black, but not the consumer / trans damage to the supplier !!! fool fool laughing laughing laughing in this case, the arbitration has been overhauled ... and the question is whether they have enough brain to fix their joint or will they end up undermining their trust in them !!! request request lol lol lol
                  1. Nyrobsky
                    Nyrobsky April 20 2018 23: 20
                    +2
                    Quote: Nikolai the Greek
                    oh well ... there really the court radically changed the terms of the contracts, which had serious consequences ... based on the contracts (and not the current from the contracts, but even from common sense), the supplier should have remained in the black, but not the consumer / trans damage to the supplier !!! in this case, the arbitration has been overhauled ... and the question is whether they have enough brain to fix their joint or will they end up undermining their trust in them !!!

                    This is understandable even without your emoticons like fool I am not talking specifically about the current situation. The fact that the Stockholm court messed up there under the pressure of “partners” is the problem of the court. I’m talking about the principle of international law in resolving a dispute between two business entities, which should exclude preferences for one of the parties. There should be a reinforced concrete principle of compliance with the conditions of the signed contract. Based on this, whether Russia or Zanzibar, they prefer foreign courts relying on objectivity in the consideration of the case. Judging by recent events, the objectivity of any vessels has its own fixed price.
                    1. Nikolai Grek
                      Nikolai Grek April 21 2018 03: 50
                      +4
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      This is understandable even without your emoticons like

                      smiley fool was not for you !!! tongue laughing laughing drinks drinks drinks
          2. alexmach
            alexmach April 20 2018 22: 46
            +1
            Gazprom is not registered in offshore, as it seems to me.
            And the Stockholm court ... well, and who will sue you in your own court, it will be well, judge for yourself logically. The court must be independent.
            1. Nikolai Grek
              Nikolai Grek April 21 2018 03: 53
              +3
              Quote: alexmach
              The court must be independent.

              recourse now it is clear that he is not independent at all ??? what wink wassat laughing laughing
              1. alexmach
                alexmach April 21 2018 10: 25
                +1
                Well .. it didn’t work out ..
                1. Nikolai Grek
                  Nikolai Grek April 21 2018 21: 45
                  +2
                  Quote: alexmach
                  Well .. it didn’t work out ..

                  nuuuu ... it’s time for the “world” to come to the conclusion that such excuses are not rolled ... whether in court or when delivering missile strikes for far-fetched circumstances !!! am am request
            2. Non liberoid Russian
              Non liberoid Russian April 21 2018 04: 53
              +1
              Well, this court is yes, independent ... they themselves believed that they blurted out
              1. alexmach
                alexmach April 21 2018 10: 29
                0
                No, well, that was how it should be, how this other thing happened ...

                Well, you think - the Court is not so impartial to you, but now put yourself in the shoes of the buyer, what should sue Gazprom in the Russian court? Will this court be impartial? It’s easier right away to spell out Gazprom is always right in the contract. That's just who in their right mind will sign such a contract then.
                1. Nikolai Grek
                  Nikolai Grek April 21 2018 21: 47
                  +2
                  Quote: alexmach
                  It’s easier right away to spell out Gazprom is always right in the contract. That's just who in their right mind will sign such a contract then.

                  recourse recourse as the most “honest” Stockholm court has shown, a contract now means nothing !!! what wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
                  1. alexmach
                    alexmach April 21 2018 22: 47
                    0
                    Well, actually it also happens.

                    War cancels all contracts

                    Have you heard?
          3. Non liberoid Russian
            Non liberoid Russian April 21 2018 04: 54
            0
            Seriously ? you said such a game now
        2. Dym71
          Dym71 April 20 2018 20: 13
          0
          Quote: Shurik70
          And why to the Stockholm court? From which side is he here at all.

          Because every gas scandal directly affects deliveries to Europe, read the history of gas showdowns in Russia and Ukraine. Ukraine does not care for gas concerns in Europe, they, in accordance with the signed agreements, will demand any shortage from us. hi
        3. NordOst16
          NordOst16 April 20 2018 21: 41
          +1
          Not least of all, this became possible due to errors in the contract.
          1. Kent0001
            Kent0001 April 20 2018 22: 41
            +1
            Finally, the first sound thought. I was wondering, well, when will someone already pay attention to the fact that the contract was established not by the gold, but probably by the platinum lawyers of the miller. But since Miller is FRIEND, there will be nothing to him or her to PLATINUM lawyers, even if Gazprom makes these grandmas pay ..., we can compensate for the benefit of medicine, education and pensions ...
            1. alexmach
              alexmach April 21 2018 18: 37
              0
              Well, wise guys, tell me those where the Miller’s golden lawyers set up that? Show me the mistakes, and how do you think it should have been without errors?
        4. Hey
          Hey April 20 2018 22: 17
          +2
          And why to the Stockholm court?

          The initial agreement between Gazprom and Naftogaz indicated that in the event of any disagreement under the agreement, we will contact the Stockholm Arbitration Court, i.e. both parties initially recognized its jurisdiction over themselves.
        5. Non liberoid Russian
          Non liberoid Russian April 21 2018 04: 52
          +1
          because the contract spells out this arbitration as a tool for resolving disputes
      2. Lelek
        Lelek April 20 2018 23: 49
        +1
        Quote: Wend
        Well, they warned that in 2019 transit will be closed.

        hi
        Warned. At the same time, they warned that in order to prolong the transit, a new agreement would be needed (the current agreement was concluded with friendly Ukraine, but time changed the priorities and a new agreement would be concluded with the enemy), and this also changed the calculation point (the calculation was carried out on the border of Ukraine and the EU), the price for gas and transit and transit volumes themselves. Those. GTS of the former Ukraine is unprofitable. Already, Western economists have estimated it (GTS) at only $ 10 billion, about which Kiev is choked with snot (since the same $ 10 billion is needed for major repairs of the system). It's only the beginning.
    2. vorobey
      vorobey April 20 2018 18: 56
      +9
      Quote: Herkulesich
      make out publicly


      and I would blow ... repeat for greater reliability ... do you understand the attack ... repeat repeat

      1. Herculesic
        Herculesic April 20 2018 18: 59
        +3
        Nobody pulled the tongue, on January 1, 2019 we are waiting for the fireworks from the pipeline! !! wassat
        1. vorobey
          vorobey April 20 2018 19: 07
          +5
          Quote: Herkulesich
          Nobody pulled the tongue, on January 1, 2019 we are waiting for the fireworks from the pipeline! !! wassat


          yeah .. it's flying ... repeat

        2. Evdokim
          Evdokim April 20 2018 19: 14
          +3
          Quote: Herkulesich
          No one pulled his tongue

          Strange achressors went, they go to court from the beginning, then they deprive them of transit money, and disdain to fight. laughing
        3. NKT
          NKT April 20 2018 21: 41
          +1
          1.01.2020 0.00.01 in
      2. Hunter 2
        Hunter 2 April 20 2018 19: 00
        +4
        Alexander categorically Greetings! Some kind of you "destroyer" today! But what about - Scrap! There are no pioneers now! Who will make the plan ???
        laughing
        Quote: vorobey
        Quote: Herkulesich
        make out publicly


        and I would blow ... repeat for greater reliability ... terrorist attack ... repeat repeat

        1. Angara
          Angara April 20 2018 19: 07
          +2
          Quote: Hunter 2
          Who will make the plan ???

          homeless, of course laughing
      3. AL176STM30
        AL176STM30 April 20 2018 19: 01
        +3
        the then prime ministers of the two countries, Vladimir Putin and Yulia Tymoshenko.
        Who are you mouths open for? wink
        1. vorobey
          vorobey April 20 2018 19: 10
          +6
          Quote: AL176STM30
          the then prime ministers of the two countries, Vladimir Putin and Yulia Tymoshenko.
          Who are you mouths open for? wink


          and that .. Putin won’t even enter the Time rating .. and Julia was sitting in prison for that ... sort the lads for metal ..
      4. evil partisan
        evil partisan April 20 2018 19: 45
        +2
        Quote: vorobey
        and I would blow ... for greater reliability ..

        belay
        Article 258-2. Public calls for a terrorist act
        1. Public calls for the commission of a terrorist act, as well as the distribution, manufacture or storage for the purpose of distribution of materials with such calls -

        shall be punishable by correctable robots for a term of up to two years or by arrest for a term of up to six months, or by restriction of will for a term of up to three years, or by imprisonment for the same term.

        2. The same actions committed using the media -

        shall be punished by restraint of will for a term of up to four years or imprisonment for a term of up to five years with the deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years.

        Well ... a talker bird wink ... 40 liters of moonshine or screen will go to the prosecutor. smile
        1. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek April 20 2018 22: 25
          +2
          Quote: wicked partisan
          Quote: vorobey
          and I would blow ... for greater reliability ..

          belay
          Article 258-2. Public calls for a terrorist act
          1. Public calls for the commission of a terrorist act, as well as the distribution, manufacture or storage for the purpose of distribution of materials with such calls -

          shall be punishable by correctable robots for a term of up to two years or by arrest for a term of up to six months, or by restriction of will for a term of up to three years, or by imprisonment for the same term.

          2. The same actions committed using the media -

          shall be punished by restraint of will for a term of up to four years or imprisonment for a term of up to five years with the deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years.

          Well ... a talker bird wink ... 40 liters of moonshine or screen will go to the prosecutor. smile

          and to whom are you going to send the screen ??? recourse recourse especially in Hohland laws do not apply !!! wink yes laughing laughing laughing
        2. Vlad.by
          Vlad.by April 20 2018 22: 34
          +1
          Send already, do not pull the veins, the blackmailer ...
          Are you like exceptional?
      5. Terenin
        Terenin April 20 2018 21: 59
        +5
        Quote: vorobey
        and I would have blown up ... for greater reliability ... you understand the attack ...

        Why blast when the valve is on our side? We are not the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatars, who blew up electric poles in the Crimea. And about the attack ... repeat but not from our side. Here, as in the axioms of Alpha: - Destroying the enemy is a craft, and making shot dead is an art.
    3. figwam
      figwam April 20 2018 19: 04
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      It is necessary for the new 2019 year to publicly disassemble the section of the pipeline vna ukroinu

      So they will take apart the rest for scrap.
      1. Vlad.by
        Vlad.by April 20 2018 22: 37
        0
        Friend, e prapanova! It is necessary to drag the pipe into our territory. And surrender a former stranger to metal. And let Gazprom deal with its own.
    4. RASKAT
      RASKAT April 20 2018 19: 53
      +1
      First you need to finish building, and then cut it off, this is first. And secondly, we are now supplying 95 billion cubic meters through Ukraine, the Nord Stream 2 will unload 55 billion and still 40 billion remain. If we quickly build the Turkish stream and its continuation into the Balkans to Greece and then this is 30 billion. Anyway, 10 billion remains and plus, do not forget that we increase deliveries every year. It’s impossible to completely turn off Ukraine anyway, unfortunately, although I really want to at times, it’s too painful they became impudent.
      1. helmi8
        helmi8 April 20 2018 20: 29
        0
        Quote: RASKAT
        It’s all the same impossible to completely turn off Ukraine, unfortunately, although I really want to at times, it’s too painful they became impudent.

        Yes, and God is with them. Let them take the GTS themselves and serve it themselves. And to sell gas at the border. So let the Europeans then deal with them for supplies and transit - we have nothing to do with it, we sold gas on the meter, and how much it got to Europe is a transit problem.
        1. faridg7
          faridg7 April 21 2018 00: 33
          +2
          Europeans do not want that. They want to pay for the gas received at their hub, and assign the problems with the transit country to the supplier, it is both more profitable and convenient for them. And while current contracts are in effect, it will be so. That's when these contracts expire, we will see how they relate to rake dancing in the government and Gazprom.
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 20 2018 20: 35
        +1
        Everything else is gas carriers Yamal LNG.
        1. RASKAT
          RASKAT April 20 2018 20: 45
          +1
          Gas from Yamal LNG has already been scheduled and has not been contracted for 30 years ahead. It is possible if we accumulate enough contracts for volumes, it will be possible to build another branch of the Turkish stream, one branch for 15 billion.
          1. Hey
            Hey April 20 2018 22: 21
            0
            Gas from Yamal LNG has already been scheduled and contracted not 30 years in advance.


            Again they step on the same rake. It is necessary to conclude agreements for a maximum of three years. Here the situation changes every month, and they waved for 30 years. Then the courts lug about the forfeit.
      3. Vlad.by
        Vlad.by April 20 2018 22: 40
        0
        There will be no Ukrainian pipe - the Germans themselves will build a joint venture 3.
        Too much talk around to around.
        We "do not hurt them painfully - chik, and already in heaven."
      4. 22 dmdc
        22 dmdc April 21 2018 14: 40
        0
        China will take 10 billion. At least tomorrow. And then they will not be enough. We have to increase supplies. Begin with gas carriers along the NSR, then they will complete the Power of Siberia.
    5. Separ DNR
      Separ DNR April 20 2018 21: 24
      +3
      Quote: Herkulesich
      We need to publicly disassemble the section of the pipeline for ukroinu for the new 2019 year!

      Wait, wait stop yes
      Where are you in a hurry? Russia still grow in the provinces of the former "independent".

      You do not manage good things in a businesslike way, by the way still Soviet ... You should at least “disassemble” others in general.
      Have to restore ...
    6. NordOst16
      NordOst16 April 20 2018 21: 42
      0
      Do not share the skin of an unkilled bear because Nord Stream 2 has not yet been built. And if it is not built, then we will have no choice what to download
    7. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch April 20 2018 21: 48
      0
      Quote: Herkulesich
      so to speak, banderloham a gift from Russian Santa Claus

      Actually, what does Stockholm have to do with it? Arbitration of some kind, of course.
      I heard from Uncle Vova the phrase about SOVEREIGNTY .. So I repeat the question - what does Stockholm have to do with it?
      They sit, that way, 3-5-150 Swedish homosexuals, and decide, you know, the fate of OUR gas.
      Do you, dudes, Swedish eyes do not burst from overstrain? You do not know how much to count, how much we bite off our gas.
  2. dr.star75
    dr.star75 April 20 2018 18: 55
    +3
    Gazprom is suing Naftogaz in Stockholm, while Ukrainians are detaining our vessels in the Sea of ​​Azov and are being tried in Ukraine. Did I understand everything correctly? So which state is independent?
    1. 210ox
      210ox April 20 2018 18: 57
      +2
      Well, probably "Stockholm" ... yes
      Quote: dr.star75
      Gazprom is suing Naftogaz in Stockholm, while Ukrainians are detaining our vessels in the Sea of ​​Azov and are being tried in Ukraine. Did I understand everything correctly? So which state is independent?
    2. Volodin
      Volodin April 20 2018 18: 58
      +5
      Quote: dr.star75
      So which state is independent?

      Yes, Ukraine, for any ... "Do not go to the grandmother" ...
      1. Herculesic
        Herculesic April 20 2018 19: 01
        +1
        Volodin hi And from what and who is ukroina independent of? ?? what ??
        1. vorobey
          vorobey April 20 2018 19: 13
          +6
          Quote: Herkulesich
          Volodin hi And from what and who is ukroina independent of? ?? what ??


          Vitalich .. this is Alexei joking .. hi he can’t set emoticons .. I also put emoticons for safety now .. they beat me here in my gentle body several times .. who didn’t understand .. laughing laughing
      2. Lelek
        Lelek April 21 2018 00: 00
        +1
        Quote: Volodin
        Yes, Ukraine, for any ... "Do not go to the grandmother" ...

        hi
        And we have gas, this time; and in the Crimea water supply, here. In Crimea, many investment agreements were concluded, and an agreement on the ferry Crimea-Burgas is being worked out with the Bulgarians. A trifle, but nice.
    3. Svarog
      Svarog April 20 2018 19: 00
      +2
      Quote: dr.star75
      Gazprom is suing Naftogaz in Stockholm, while Ukrainians are detaining our vessels in the Sea of ​​Azov and are being tried in Ukraine. Did I understand everything correctly? So which state is independent?

      It’s precisely noticed .. The feeling is that only Russia is trying to play by the rules .. but the question arises - why? If there are no rules ..
      1. dr.star75
        dr.star75 April 20 2018 19: 12
        +2
        This is reminiscent of a situation where the passenger of a train got hooked in a compartment to the katals, and hopes for honest rules. And you need to act like this: there was a hockey match between us and the Americans, they began to be rude and use brutal power struggle, leading many of our hockey players, the judge “didn’t see anything” and did not respond to our appeals. Then our coach ordered not to spare them either, and ours crippled the Americans, as a result of which, during the break, the American coach approached us and offered to play normal hockey, which was done
    4. vorobey
      vorobey April 20 2018 19: 05
      +3
      Quote: dr.star75
      Gazprom is suing Naftogaz in Stockholm, while Ukrainians are detaining our vessels in the Sea of ​​Azov and are being tried in Ukraine. Did I understand everything correctly? So which state is independent?

      1. dr.star75
        dr.star75 April 20 2018 19: 15
        0
        A violinist is not needed?
        1. vorobey
          vorobey April 20 2018 19: 21
          +7
          Quote: dr.star75
          A violinist is not needed?


          instead of thinking that you are the first Georgian astronaut. better return the spoon that stolen from stray artists ... hi
          1. dr.star75
            dr.star75 April 20 2018 19: 34
            0
            This kid thinks for me the wrong moves. - And you think with your mind, and not a stranger! lol
            1. vorobey
              vorobey April 20 2018 19: 36
              +2
              Quote: dr.star75
              This kid thinks for me the wrong moves. - And you think with your mind, and not a stranger! lol


              1. dr.star75
                dr.star75 April 20 2018 19: 40
                0
                The link is broken, it does not open.
        2. Gumma
          Gumma April 20 2018 20: 09
          0
          Uncle Vova, Skripal is not needed ... So?
    5. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch April 20 2018 22: 07
      0
      Quote: dr.star75
      So which state is independent?

      We, massaraks, 2018 World Cup, what would he ...
      Maybe there will be + fucking when-thread then ...
      But while I’m spat on myself, I think. They spit at me, but I wrap around, wrap around and again, massaraksh, wrap around.
      This damn mudko ever answer for the jambs ???
  3. 210ox
    210ox April 20 2018 18: 56
    +1
    Stockholm Arbitration to Ukrainian Zindan!
  4. NEXUS
    NEXUS April 20 2018 19: 11
    0
    Today, the Stockholm Arbitration received documents from the Russian company Gazprom, reporting on the procedure for terminating contracts with the Ukrainian Naftogaz. Information citing sources in Gazprom published

    I think the catch phrase about Chapai, which was also made known to Gagarin, who flew by, does not need to be reminded ...
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 April 20 2018 19: 44
      0
      I already know what this court will say: Gazprom’s lawsuit does not comply with European traditions. Do not break the contract. And what next? Write in sportloto?
    2. URAL72
      URAL72 April 20 2018 20: 57
      +2
      Gagarin should not be touched, it is sacred. Let's say Goering ...
  5. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov April 20 2018 19: 13
    0
    So now Gazprom will still be pressed and everything will grow together with Naftogaz!
  6. Heterocapsa
    Heterocapsa April 20 2018 19: 16
    +1
    Yes, no one will close anything; gas will continue to go simply in smaller volumes and according to forecasts of Gazprom itself, it will take more than one year. So don’t dream.
  7. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD April 20 2018 19: 26
    +1
    Tymoshenko’s transit arrangements in Ukraine are weak, but they don’t show much desire to revise them. 404 is no alternative for those who want to understand the reason ...
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 April 20 2018 19: 41
      0
      Abroad will help us!
  9. Vlad Morozov
    Vlad Morozov April 20 2018 19: 30
    0
    If not terminated, then SP-2 cannot be built! Right move!
  10. XXXIII
    XXXIII April 20 2018 19: 30
    +2
    Gazprom is ready to negotiate with Naftogaz Ukrainy on the transit of gas after 2019. However, Ukraine must justify the economic feasibility of transit through its territory, "Gazprom’s head Alexei Miller confirmed to reporters on the Russian side.
    RIA Novosti Ukraine: https://rian.com.ua/economy/20180420/1034463246/r
    ussia-napravila-rastorzhenie-kontraktov.html
    Goodbye not washed European .... wassat
  11. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter April 20 2018 19: 55
    0
    At last! It is high time...
  12. Slovak
    Slovak April 20 2018 20: 01
    0
    How can I continue to work through the Stockholm court and arbitration? The Swedes have shown their independence.
    1. Lumumba
      Lumumba April 20 2018 20: 28
      0
      They are doing everything right !!! In Europe, there are a lot of smart people among ordinary people and among economists and businessmen! They must see that Russia always acts according to the law! Sooner or later, we will have to deal with them, even if they do not like or are afraid of Russia, but they must see that Russia is doing the right thing, that is, by law !!
  13. mvnmln
    mvnmln April 20 2018 20: 07
    0
    The circus continues, the clowns are the same!
  14. Varyag77
    Varyag77 April 20 2018 20: 16
    0
    Well all? shouted? clapped her hands? Well, okay.
    we’ll see how you will sing when the court prohibits breaking the contract. And we will do it. and continue to deliver.
    1. Monarchist
      Monarchist April 20 2018 21: 07
      +1
      Suppose Gazprom had to figure out all the possible options, otherwise their analyst and lawyers were worthless
      1. Varyag77
        Varyag77 April 20 2018 22: 45
        +1
        Quote: Monarchist
        Suppose Gazprom had to figure out all the possible options, otherwise their analyst and lawyers were worthless

        Unfortunately, it is simply impossible to calculate the degree of cynicism, duplicity and double standards used by the West in the fight against us. They have already crossed all sides of the rational.
        Neither international law, nor taking into account the interests of other countries, much less respect for their interests, is no more. I think it will all end in only one way. Absolutely unpleasant for everyone.
  15. u1977020556
    u1977020556 April 20 2018 20: 21
    0
    Well nakakoneu something. ... so they need it, upstarts.
  16. Monarchist
    Monarchist April 20 2018 21: 01
    +1
    Quote: Shurik70
    And why to the Stockholm court? From which side is he here at all.
    Too many political decisions are made in this Stockholm. Take at least their argument "Russia must pay money to Ukraine, because Ukraine is poor."
    Moscow had to be contacted.

    And then lottery tickets? Nona Mordyukova as she said: "whoever buys a pack of tickets will receive a water pump."
  17. Antares
    Antares April 20 2018 22: 23
    +1
    Despite the fact that Ukrainian consumers have consistently received and are receiving gas under this contract, which provided for discounts

    There are no discounts in this contract
    The text of the contract.
    https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/articles/2009/01/22
    / 4462671 /
    By the way, those who ask why in Sweden. Paragraph 8.2 for example
    The discount is Kharkov agreement.
    Gazprom decided to play on. I hope for the big.
    In general, then it's time to turn Miller. But they don’t leave their own.
  18. T.Henks
    T.Henks April 21 2018 08: 47
    0
    And which of the commentators even saw this agreement? What to talk about without knowing the essence of the matter?
    It is not publicly available. Chatter since 2008 about violations and theft. Kiriyenko, or whatever they call the PR man from Gazprom, who is jumping in his felt boots before each new year, you consider him a prophet. All lies. There is no basis for comments on the court decision. Politics or not, there is a solution, and not in favor of Gazprom. And there is a reservation of funds for the payment of Khokhlov billions by this decision. The rest is for people chatter. Alas.
  19. Oleg Kozlov
    Oleg Kozlov April 21 2018 08: 55
    +1
    So far, our affairs will be decided in Stockholm, London, Brussels, Washington, etc. - we will always lose and flirt. Play hugs with an opponent who hits you with all available means without any rules. This is masochism. Or betrayal.
  20. iouris
    iouris April 22 2018 11: 24
    0
    It is not clear why it is necessary to terminate the contract through arbitration, especially Stockholm, which has already confirmed its commitment. There is force majeure - the Russian Federation has been declared an aggressor state in Ukraine, i.e. war is declared.