State Department: In the near future, we will win ISIS * in Syria. So Trump has already won ...

Speaking at the House of Representatives, Assistant Head of the US Department of State for Europe and Asia, Wess Mitchell told the congressmen about plans for an operation in Syria. According to Mitchell, the Islamic State terrorist group (* banned in the Russian Federation) “will soon be weakened and defeated” by the United States of America and its allies.

The statement about the “victory over ISIL in the near future” was made a few months after US President Donald Trump spoke out about “a complete victory over ISIL * in Syria”. Did Mr. Mitchell really not hear those victorious speeches from his president, or did Mr. Mitchell have data that is somewhat different from those that are sent to Trump as text?

Mitchell also added that the United States, together with its allies, intend to "limit the pernicious influence of Iran in Syria." The representative of the US Foreign Ministry did not speak about the final terms of the “restriction”.

In the State Department, it is noted that under the control of ISIS *, in the SAR at the moment, there remains about 2% of the territory from that which was previously controlled by this grouping.

Here are just one thing they don’t say in the State Department: why did the United States and allies start waging a "fierce" fight against the "Islamic state" * only after the military rocket forces of Russia appeared in Syria? Why did the territories controlled by ISIL expand until the appearance of Russian soldiers in the UAR, and did the videos on all Western channels show how the terrorists were already outraged in the districts of Damascus? ..

Comments

[Shrpv]

For this, America decided to commit suicide? Without America, there is no ISIS.

[Hire]

Mitchell also added that the United States, along with its allies, intends to "limit Iran’s detrimental influence in Syria."

Here I didn’t understand at all: whom are the States going to protect from the "harmful influence of Iran"? Really Assad?

[iliitchitch]

Quote: Hire

Here I didn’t understand at all: whom are the States going to protect from the "harmful influence of Iran"?

Iran they need to dunk, the "passengers" end, and even that. That’s the reason for the "furious fight against the igil."

[Shrpv]

At the tribunal of the bearded man, pointing to the Americans, they ask, did these also defeat us?

[Borik]

How! Have you not won yet? And Trump has already celebrated the victory.

[NIKNN]

The United States, along with its allies, intends to "limit Iran's detrimental influence in Syria."

But when will they crack there? Well, or stick together ...

[taiga2018]

it’s unlikely that it will be possible to limit Iran’s influence, it’s not for this that they shed their blood there so that it would be so simple to take and limit ...

[andranick]

“Limit Iran’s detrimental influence in Syria”

From this is the essence, clearly showing the customer

[tagil]

They just make it clear that they do not intend to leave Syria, but they really want to transfer most of the costs and losses in l / s to their “allies”. And only they will skim the cream. They, too, will force God's slaves to be both a cot and a blood tax. And the fact that the Jews shout that they themselves can shout even further, but Iran will force them to restrain them.

[ZVS]

So the State Department does not keep up with the “win” for Trump. Syria and Russia will destroy the IS, then the State Department will report that it “defeated” the IS.
Were clowns, and remain so. The population of Tan is stupid, and what the State Department will say to him is what they believe.

[Herculesic]

This is their political series "victory over the igil", shot according to the script written by the leadership of the igil! !!

[NEXUS]

“In the near future will be weakened and defeated” by the United States of America and their allies.

The victors ... have already proclaimed themselves the main winners of ISIS.
And did these Igilovites also win? Just like in Nuremberg about the French ...

[pvv113]

State Department: In the near future we will defeat ISIS * in Syria.

WINS

[PMCs]

It seems Russia also screwed up with this issue.

[Sands Careers General]

Victors. Accustomed to travel on someone else's neck and appropriate a victory.
In the Czech Republic, young people quite seriously believe that the Americans liberated Prague.

[Prisoner]

In the line of the dog, in the line.

[Sergey985]

This is what I understand, real fighters! Trump won the first! The State Department revived and won again! Warriors !!!

[Serhiodjan]

And I have a feeling that the Americans caught the virus of acute Ukrainianism ... in fact, it is not clear to the end who infected anyone but the similarities in person. I won’t be surprised if soon the State Department starts jumping in the mornings and the CIA puts on pots
It is written correctly in the Bible - let them be rewarded according to their deeds.

[Radical]

State Department: In the near future, we will win ISIS * in Syria. So Trump has already won ...

What arrogance - our Guarantor won the first!

[kig]

So we also won there. The President himself congratulated on the victory in Syria. It turns out that somewhere there are twice defeated? Or have the Yankees defeated various enemies?

[MadCat]

State Department: In the near future we will defeat ISIS * in Syria. So Trump has already won

So Putin didn’t get in the way for the third time to defeat everyone, and is Trump worse?

[gukoyan]

"... a few months after US President Donald Trump spoke out about" a complete victory over ISIS * in Syria ""

Well, as if at one time Shoigu and Putin also announced victory over the IG)))
Something everyone defeats him, and he, like the Phoenix, is reborn, or how the Hydra grows new heads ...

[Sazhka]

So Putin also seems to have already “won” .. What’s the trick. Two balabol try to outdo each other a lie. The usual thing..