Military Review

Syria has no C-300 SAMs. Russia can correct this omission

288
Moscow is ready to return to the discussion of the supply of C-300 air defense systems to Syria. This was stated by the head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of Russia Sergey Rudskoy.


Syria has no C-300 SAMs. Russia can correct this omission


I would like to note that several years ago, given the urgent request of some of our western partners, we refused to supply anti-aircraft missile systems C-300 to Syria
- said Rudskoy on the TV channel "Russia 24".

He noted that, given the impact of the Western coalition on Syria, Russia considers it possible to return to the consideration of this issue.

And not only with respect to Syria, but also other states.
- quotes his words RIA "News».

The Russian Defense Ministry noted that the Syrian air defense was able to repel a significant part of the coalition missiles. Russia's air defenses were also alerted.

Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia most seriously condemns the attack on Syria, where Russian servicemen are helping the legitimate government in the fight against terror.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
288 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 April 14 2018 12: 46
      +35
      It is imperative to equip defenseless Syria, and it is necessary to do this in the very near future. That would be something to answer the Syrians this earthly fall.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 14 2018 12: 49
        +14
        Now we’ll remove several C 300 divisions from our armament and send them to Syria as gifts.
        1. Thrall
          Thrall April 14 2018 12: 53
          +25
          Quote: Vadim237
          Now we’ll remove several C 300 divisions from our armament and send them to Syria as gifts.

          Even so, then they are more needed now
          1. just exp
            just exp April 14 2018 14: 09
            +12
            here it is necessary to note one more nuance - the Syrians must also be taught to use them.
            and it would be nice if the Syrians on Khmeimim on S-400 were on duty along with ours, and studied with ours directly on duty. so to say study along with practice.
            1. Nikolay Fedorov
              Nikolay Fedorov April 14 2018 14: 23
              +18
              Quote: just EXPL
              here it is necessary to note one more nuance - the Syrians must also be taught to use them ...

              It would be nice to teach the Syrians not to run away from the position at the beginning of the battle, to love their homeland wholeheartedly, not sparing their lives. Unfortunately, it still does not work ... That in Soviet times the Syrians threw everything and ticked away from the Jews, and our advisers were forced to accept an unequal battle. What now ... History repeats itself.
              So it’s not so simple with the transfer of expensive equipment to the Syrians.
              1. Hiller
                Hiller April 14 2018 19: 16
                +4
                it is "treated" and easy .. From 300 to Iran and Iranian crews in Syria on the database.
              2. Hiller
                Hiller April 15 2018 14: 02
                +1
                it’s even simpler .. remember the experience of the Korean and Vietnamese wars ...... our crews in Syrian uniforms ... new - well forgotten old ... let the Russian leadership help. which is more correct and more profitable ..
                1. Dr. Bermental
                  Dr. Bermental April 15 2018 19: 29
                  +2
                  we don’t have to ... Syrians to teach and control ... control is the mother of order .. but in general it’s all a psychic attack - political poker (tahas hold'em) where, in extreme cases, you can always fold cards ... they are all poker bluffers did not hear it
                2. Alf
                  Alf April 15 2018 21: 22
                  0
                  Quote: hiller
                  let the leadership of the Russian Federation help. which is more correct and more profitable ..

                  The leadership of the Russian Federation has long been discussing everything, since it still calls the enemies of Russia "partners."
          2. groks
            groks April 14 2018 14: 32
            0
            then they’re more needed now

            And you did not think that this could be the point of provocation?
        2. Shahno
          Shahno April 14 2018 12: 53
          +5
          A better half of all that is available, just the entire BV will close ....
          1. Maz
            Maz April 14 2018 14: 14
            +19
            Israel is disappointed: the strike on Syria strengthened Assad’s regime and Iran’s position. laughing
            “It would be better if there was no attack at all - it“ leaves Israel alone in the face of the situation ”, as usual - Crying by the wall. But they did everything so that the raid took place. wink
        3. Muvka
          Muvka April 14 2018 12: 54
          +28
          Quote: Vadim237
          Now we’ll remove several C 300 divisions from our armament and send them to Syria as gifts.

          Why shoot. We are re-equipping the regiments on the S-400. Here complexes that have been vacated in a few years can be sent to Syria.
          1. groks
            groks April 14 2018 14: 34
            +1
            No need to write stupidity. It’s not AK, it’s not done in half a day. We’ll bring a dozen to 25, and everyone will be happy.
        4. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 14 2018 13: 03
          +16
          Quote: Vadim237
          Now we have several divisions from our armament. With 300 we’ll remove and send to Syria

          Hamas must be delivered with 300
          1. Logall
            Logall April 14 2018 13: 09
            +10
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Hamas must be delivered with 300

            And the funds from your pocket? It is necessary, it is necessary, it is necessary ...
            We must answer for ourselves, then the allies will stop tyranny! Just the word "Russia" will cause a convulsive thrill ...
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov April 14 2018 13: 12
              +7
              Quote: Logall
              funds from your pocket?

              Americans and Jews, as you are against such supplies.
              1. Logall
                Logall April 14 2018 13: 17
                +9
                I don’t mind, but the budget will not pull so many gifts! Or do you need to remove your systems from combat duty, expose the rear, but annoy the Jews?
                1. Bad_santa
                  Bad_santa April 14 2018 13: 46
                  +15
                  The budget will not pull the utilization of S-300 systems in place of the introduced S-400s. But seriously, I served in the missile brigade, armed with Tochka-U, and then drove the Iskanders already. Personnel of year 2 underwent gradual retraining for Iskander in KapYar. Our part went through some interactions with Syria (I think not only one part), I don’t want to write or disclose all of this either, since this generally runs counter to the officially voiced version. In general, the government voices about 20 percent of all interactions between Russia and Syria in the military sphere. I did not give a subscription, but I have no right to tell. In short, the Tochka-U systems we can overwhelm Syria so much that even the use of Russian aviation is not even needed. I was shocked by the number of items when I went into the RAV underground storage.
                  1. Nikolay Fedorov
                    Nikolay Fedorov April 14 2018 14: 32
                    +5
                    Quote: Bad_Santa
                    The budget will not pull the utilization of S-300 systems in place of the introduced S-400s. But seriously, I served in the missile brigade, armed with Tochka-U, and then drove the Iskanders already. Personnel of year 2 underwent gradual retraining for Iskander in KapYar. Our part went through some interactions with Syria (I think not only one part), I don’t want to write or disclose all of this either, since this generally runs counter to the officially voiced version. In general, the government voices about 20 percent of all interactions between Russia and Syria in the military sphere. I did not give a subscription, but I have no right to tell. In short, the Tochka-U systems we can overwhelm Syria so much that even the use of Russian aviation is not even needed. I was shocked by the number of items when I went into the RAV underground storage.

                    In fact, the Syrians have retained four missile brigades today. One of them is armed with Points. In fact, they still did not really enter the battle. Apparently they will begin soon.
                    1. Bad_santa
                      Bad_santa April 14 2018 14: 40
                      +5
                      It was with these teams that we had interaction. But the Points are not used, because it is not advisable. The barmalei have no missile defense, and even the Israeli Dome is unlikely to succeed in shooting down the same Tochka-U at the final stage. It is necessary to prepare for war against the Kurds and the remains of ISIS. Something tells me that the next step will be a strike by the Kurds
                    2. noct
                      noct April 14 2018 20: 40
                      0
                      specific goals have not yet been. the point is still a strategic weapon
                  2. Thrall
                    Thrall April 14 2018 14: 35
                    +5
                    I also used to serve the Belarusian nuclear button. But I won’t tell you how everything was. But if you knew, then the jaw would have sagged, as in fact everything is there. Here. smile
                    1. Logall
                      Logall April 14 2018 14: 44
                      +10
                      Quote: Thrall
                      belarusian nuclear button

                      Belarusian nuclear button? Comrade, well, you're burning. It will be abruptly your "Belarusian horde"!
                      Respect! drinks hi
                      1. Nikolay Fedorov
                        Nikolay Fedorov April 14 2018 16: 54
                        +3
                        Quote: Logall
                        Quote: Thrall
                        belarusian nuclear button

                        Belarusian nuclear button? Comrade, well, you're burning. It will be abruptly your "Belarusian horde"!

                        Well, actually, nuclear weapons in the USSR were poked everywhere - from the Kaliningrad region to Sakhalin. And this is absolutely natural. It would be strange if there were no missiles in the Kaliningrad forests. It would be strange if there were no missiles in the Belarusian forests.
                      2. bessonov932
                        bessonov932 April 15 2018 21: 57
                        0
                        I was not far from the Novosibirsk button (DB in 1980-1981). What is this?)))
                2. Guillon
                  Guillon April 14 2018 14: 46
                  0
                  Logal, don’t you think that the road is a spoon for dinner ?!
                  1. Logall
                    Logall April 14 2018 15: 02
                    +8
                    There is a spoon, but they just missed dinner ... A feast without us happened! If we had fought back, we would not have talked about deliveries of air defense systems to the Syrians.
                    Ours did not expect such actions. They thought they would take a word. But no, they checked. They will check further ... Now we need air defense systems throughout the territory! Avaricious pays twice, ochkun three times, ours will pay four times, "avaricious ochkun" ...
                    1. Black Colonel
                      Black Colonel April 14 2018 15: 26
                      +4
                      But "Vladimir Putin said that Russia condemns the attack on Syria in the most serious way, where Russian troops are helping the legitimate government fight terror." AND THE MOST SERIOUS, THIS IS A SHOE IN THE STAND?
                      1. noct
                        noct April 14 2018 20: 42
                        +1
                        Khrushchev hollowed with his shoe. and put the missiles on the cube. but somehow it happened that they wanted to talk to us right away ...
              2. Angel_and_Demon
                Angel_and_Demon April 14 2018 13: 17
                +5
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Americans and Jews, as you are against such supplies.

                and you against the "Answers"? or went in just to bother?
                1. Logall
                  Logall April 14 2018 13: 21
                  +13
                  Brother, he is very saddened by the lack of an answer, but blind faith in the "guarantor" does not allow this fact to be recognized!
                  1. K-50
                    K-50 April 14 2018 13: 29
                    +22
                    Quote: Logall
                    Brother, he is very saddened by the lack of an answer, but blind faith in the "guarantor" does not allow this fact to be recognized!

                    And I am probably satisfied with the "not an answer" of the guarantor. Because the nuclear apocalypse is an alternative, and the next morning you can wake up with radioactive ash.
                    Of course, it is very difficult for him now to listen to all the nonsense, they say, "Russia passed." Russia has not surrendered, but apparently it’s not the time and there is still room for maneuver. We do not have all the information and the fate of the whole planet and its civilization does not lie on us, so we can scream almost anything that comes to our mind, responsibility is not ours.
                    Therefore, while there is an opportunity, he is trying to save the world, and I think it was agreed with Assad.
                    So there is more patience and faith in Russia and its commander in chief. hi
                    1. Logall
                      Logall April 14 2018 13: 32
                      +5
                      At least one plane could be shot down! War wouldn’t happen ...
                      So I corresponded with a friend, there’s nothing to add
                    2. Alf
                      Alf April 14 2018 14: 35
                      +5
                      Quote: K-50
                      And I am probably satisfied with the "not an answer" of the guarantor. Because the nuclear apocalypse is an alternative, and the next morning you can wake up with radioactive ash.

                      And then what was the point of shouting at all angles that the answer would and will be at the launch sites? In general, again a bunch in a puddle.
                      1. Stanislas
                        Stanislas April 14 2018 15: 15
                        +5
                        Quote: Alf
                        what was the point at all angles of shouting that the answer would and will be at the launch sites?
                        What is the answer? Were our facilities affected? Did our military or diplomats suffer? Only for this they were warned. So what about tryndezh?
                        Quote: Alf
                        bunch in a puddle
                    3. groks
                      groks April 14 2018 14: 42
                      +7
                      And I'm probably satisfied

                      So it was not necessary to bend your fingers. There was no need to wave the west with their cartoons. Silent and there would not be all this wave.
                      Now, they started talking about the S-300.
                    4. Guillon
                      Guillon April 14 2018 14: 52
                      +2
                      Blessed are the believers!
                      But we can’t not answer - this is a crime !!! request
                    5. New Year day
                      New Year day April 14 2018 14: 55
                      +7
                      Quote: K-50
                      And I am probably satisfied with the "not an answer" of the guarantor. Because the nuclear apocalypse is an alternative, and the next morning you can wake up with radioactive ash.

                      I completely agree with you, although I think that I won’t get to nuclear weapons.
                      The question is, why declare a retaliatory strike? It is clear that, according to ours, the glory of God did not fall. Only doubts are there. that even, God forbid, in such a case there will be an answer. Agree, the US military response is not "in the toilet to wet"
                      1. K-50
                        K-50 April 14 2018 15: 03
                        +1
                        Quote: Silvestr
                        The question is, why declare a retaliatory strike?

                        Outlined the goals, and therefore did not hit.
                    6. wandlitz
                      wandlitz April 14 2018 16: 43
                      +1
                      I agree with your opinion !!!
                      I also think that the situation is not so hopeless.
                      You can always get in a fight. But to leave it without losses after the start of a nuclear missile war will not work.
                    7. noct
                      noct April 14 2018 20: 45
                      +1
                      I agree, moreover, I will say on the official it is clear that they bombed on empty buildings. that is, all that was needed was withdrawn and exported in advance
                  2. Angel_and_Demon
                    Angel_and_Demon April 14 2018 13: 30
                    +8
                    Quote: Logall
                    Brother, he is very saddened by the lack of an answer, but blind faith in the "guarantor" does not allow this fact to be recognized!

                    or a very tricky "guarantor", trickier than our LAS, or "non-guarantor" already
                    1. Baby sitter
                      Baby sitter April 14 2018 13: 37
                      +11
                      Poor living in Russia? Is the pension small? Are you starving? GDP is not satisfied? The borders are open, go!
                      1. Logall
                        Logall April 14 2018 13: 40
                        +7
                        Nanny, you would at least look at the flag! He is good in Belarus! There is neither Putin nor corruption ...
                      2. Angel_and_Demon
                        Angel_and_Demon April 14 2018 13: 49
                        +12
                        Quote: Baby sitter
                        Poor living in Russia? Is the pension small? Are you starving? GDP is not satisfied? The borders are open, go!

                        from anger is your eyes closed? or bile poured into the brain? "suitcase-station -...." is not for me hi
                      3. noct
                        noct April 14 2018 20: 45
                        0
                        Quote: Baby sitter
                        Poor living in Russia? Is the pension small? Are you starving? GDP is not satisfied? The borders are open, go!

                        yeah visa is easy to get)
                  3. lis-ik
                    lis-ik April 14 2018 14: 39
                    +3
                    Quote: Logall
                    Brother, he is very saddened by the lack of an answer, but blind faith in the "guarantor" does not allow this fact to be recognized!

                    That's right, there is clearly a destruction of the foundations is observed, from that and rudeness and anger.
                2. 210ox
                  210ox April 14 2018 13: 23
                  +4
                  By the way .. S300 went to Belarus after removal from duty and the corresponding repair.
                  Quote: Angel_and_Demon
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Americans and Jews, as you are against such supplies.

                  and you against the "Answers"? or went in just to bother?
                  1. Angel_and_Demon
                    Angel_and_Demon April 14 2018 13: 29
                    +6
                    Quote: 210ox
                    By the way .. S300 went to Belarus after removal from duty and the corresponding repair.

                    and where to go? NATO missile defense and aviation are very close, and after this “we will decide by political means” and I’m dumb, the gopniks will disperse, and I’m near the border, the benefit of Belovezhskaya Pushcha is nearby, and there are no vacant places there
                3. Nikolay Fedorov
                  Nikolay Fedorov April 14 2018 14: 35
                  +3
                  Quote: Angel_and_Demon
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Americans and Jews, as you are against such supplies.

                  and you against the "Answers"? or went in just to bother?

                  As I look, someone here is in combat enthusiasm and went here specifically to fight. Aw, to fight is in another place.
                  1. Angel_and_Demon
                    Angel_and_Demon April 14 2018 16: 23
                    +4
                    Quote: Nikolai Fedorov
                    As I look, someone here is in combat enthusiasm and went here specifically to fight. Aw, to fight is in another place.

                    Does Katz offer to give up further?
            2. tomket
              tomket April 14 2018 13: 38
              +1
              Quote: Logall
              And the funds from your pocket? It is necessary, it is necessary, it is necessary ...
              We must answer for ourselves, then the allies will stop tyranny! Just the word "Russia" will cause a convulsive thrill ...

              This is about how to state. And the tanks for the "Polish Army", which are on a par with our army, will we pay from our own pockets? Yes. If you do not understand, then Syria is precisely the front. You either fight there or not.
              1. Logall
                Logall April 14 2018 13: 45
                +4
                Have you read the thread carefully? Romanov was going to deliver SAMs to Hamas!
                Read carefully ...
              2. Nikolay Fedorov
                Nikolay Fedorov April 14 2018 14: 38
                +3
                Quote: tomket
                And the tanks for the "Polish Army", which are on a par with our army, will we pay from our own pockets?

                I ask for the translation of this phrase, otherwise it’s not clear. Some kind of Bambarbia to Kergud ... When translating, please pay attention to cases and numbers.
            3. artifact
              artifact April 14 2018 17: 16
              +4
              Quote: Logall
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Hamas must be delivered with 300

              And the funds from your pocket? It is necessary, it is necessary, it is necessary ...
              We must answer for ourselves, then the allies will stop tyranny! Just the word "Russia" will cause a convulsive thrill ...

              and the funds from our pocket will now fly away even faster, because “someone” didn’t have the courage to answer either the sanctions, the lawlessness of the banderlogs, or the second sonorous slap in the face of Syria. and now the fucking "partners" will continue to bend "the one who bends." for in response there are only concerns ....
          2. askort154
            askort154 April 14 2018 13: 44
            +3
            Alexander Romanov ...Nado Hamas put C 300

            No need to supply. Just a “rumor” on YouTube and Al Jazeera. yes
        5. Borik
          Borik April 14 2018 13: 07
          +2
          Again unfounded statements. Not available S-300 and in the near future will not. In the future, as our air defense system is replaced with new systems, the removed ones can be delivered to Syria.
          In the meantime, throw more “BUGY” “TORAH” “PANISHIRI” to intercept the KR.
        6. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin April 14 2018 13: 08
          +6
          Quote: Vadim237
          Now we’ll remove several C 300 divisions from our armament and send them to Syria as gifts.

          There, rather, you need the Shell and S-350 than the S-300. With a massive raid, it is not the maximum interception range that matters, but firepower, multichannel and ammunition ready for use.
          1. Nevsky_ZU
            Nevsky_ZU April 14 2018 13: 14
            +4
            these TORAS are needed there, as for me, perhaps they are even more effective than the Armor:

            1. Genry
              Genry April 14 2018 13: 24
              +4
              Against cruise missiles, planning bombs and UAVs (altitudes up to 4000 m), it is more profitable to use Derivation-Air Defense (ammunition of more than 100 rounds). Cheap and cheerful.
          2. Vadim237
            Vadim237 April 14 2018 13: 20
            +2
            With 350, we will not see any more soon - even in our army.
            1. Nevsky_ZU
              Nevsky_ZU April 14 2018 13: 21
              +2
              Quote: Vadim237
              With 350, we will not see any more soon - even in our army.

              Something on this set of news is not there since the time of 2016.
              1. alexmach
                alexmach April 14 2018 14: 45
                +1
                Well, as if tormented for one with Polement Redoubt.
        7. Safevi
          Safevi April 14 2018 13: 27
          +5
          Turkish TVs have changed the entire programming grid and broadcast only about the strike of the United States and its allies in Syria. The Turkish government’s statement said "unconditional support for the strike on the criminal regime of executioner Assad (katil Esad)," but emphasized neutrality about the confrontation between the West and Russia. Erdogan himself spoke very frankly- "We are faithful to allied relations with the United States, faithful to good-neighborly relations with Iran and faithful to cooperation with Russia." Experts have not yet expressed their attitude about the effectiveness of the strike. But they cite the words of the French military representative on the Russian side’s allegations of "intercepting 71 missiles from the 103s" - "We do not think so." The TV also showed the smoking ruins of a Syrian military factory, which is smashed to pieces.
          1. New Year day
            New Year day April 14 2018 14: 59
            +1
            Quote: sefevi
            The Turkish government’s statement said "unconditional support for the strike on the criminal regime of executioner Assad (katil Esad)," but emphasized neutrality about the confrontation between the West and Russia. Erdogan himself spoke very frankly- "We are faithful to allied relations with the United States, faithful to good-neighborly relations with Iran and faithful to cooperation with Russia."

            East is a delicate matter

            Quote: sefevi
            But they cite the words of the French military representative on the Russian side’s allegations of "intercepting 71 missiles from the 103s" - "We do not think so."

            so many are concerned about this question - how to achieve such a decent result with old weapons?
        8. Fitter65
          Fitter65 April 14 2018 14: 14
          0
          Quote: Vadim237
          Now we’ll remove several C 300 divisions from our armament and send them to Syria as gifts.

          Well, in principle, it will be so. Where to put those complexes that we changed to S-400?
      2. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov April 14 2018 12: 49
        +4
        Of course he’s lying .. But there you need to create an echelon air defense Latest!
        And then again provoke the United States and Israel into strikes ..! Only in this way will the Russian defense system be created! soldier
        PS Not bad Syrians fought back ..! Still taught them ...
        1. impostor
          impostor April 14 2018 12: 53
          +1
          The echelon (BZHRK) Assad is too early, and the echelon system has almost been built (all three lines)
        2. Karakurt
          Karakurt April 14 2018 13: 09
          +2
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Of course he’s lying .. But there you need to create an echelon air defense Latest!
          And then again provoke the United States and Israel into strikes ..! Only in this way will the Russian defense system be created! soldier
          PS Not bad Syrians fought back ..! Still taught them ...

          On the sites of Israeli "official data" of the Iranian authorities there they generally say that only 120 were shot down from 15 missiles request No.
          1. Don
            Don April 14 2018 13: 49
            +4
            Quote: Karakurt
            On the sites of Israeli "official data" of the Iranian authorities there they generally say that only 120 were shot down from 15 missiles

            Iranian authorities clearly sold themselves to the Anglo-Saxons! laughing Well, our Moscow region cannot lie, it has never happened! wassat
            But seriously, these figures are more real than the MO data. I saw in YouTube the moment of impact in the Damascus region. All missiles reached their targets almost simultaneously. This suggests that a new modification of the Axes was used, which makes it possible to barrage in the air and fly up to the target at the same time.
            1. Karakurt
              Karakurt April 14 2018 13: 56
              +1
              Quote: Donskoy
              Quote: Karakurt
              On the sites of Israeli "official data" of the Iranian authorities there they generally say that only 120 were shot down from 15 missiles

              Iranian authorities clearly sold themselves to the Anglo-Saxons! laughing Well, our Moscow region cannot lie, it has never happened! wassat
              But seriously, these figures are more real than the MO data. I saw in YouTube the moment of impact in the Damascus region. All missiles reached their targets almost simultaneously. This is a new modification of the Axes, which makes it possible to wait for comrades and fly to the goal together.

              Vasily Ivanovich would like to believe OUR repeat Indeed, OURS are not even deceiving US, but primarily V.V. Putin (he certainly will not like the deception)
              1. Don
                Don April 14 2018 14: 07
                +8
                Quote: Karakurt
                Vasily Ivanovich I would like to believe OUR feel After all, OURS are not even being deceived by US, but primarily by V.V. Putin (he definitely will not like the deception)

                Hey no, dear man. In this case, the MO speech is addressed mainly to the internal audience. Putin certainly knows our real, not propaganda, possibilities, how many missiles were and how many reached the target. Moreover, the Americans and their allies know how many targets are hit. That is why, strikes will continue with the arrival of the carrier group in Middle East.
                1. Karakurt
                  Karakurt April 14 2018 14: 09
                  0
                  Vasily Ivanovich, does it amuse or amuse you ???
                  Quote: Donskoy
                  Quote: Karakurt
                  Vasily Ivanovich I would like to believe OUR feel After all, OURS are not even being deceived by US, but primarily by V.V. Putin (he definitely will not like the deception)

                  Hey no, dear man. In this case, the MO speech is addressed mainly to the internal audience. Putin certainly knows our real, not propaganda, possibilities, how many missiles were and how many reached the target. Moreover, the Americans and their allies know how many targets are hit. That is why, strikes will continue with the arrival of the carrier group in Middle East.
                  1. Don
                    Don April 14 2018 14: 19
                    +7
                    Quote: Karakurt
                    Vasily Ivanovich, does it amuse or amuse you ???

                    Of course, it’s disturbing. I have already said for a long time that our real military capabilities and those that are shown by the zombie hunter are two big differences. Of course, you can bluff and, sometimes, you even need to, but building on this the whole of domestic and foreign policy is very dangerous. Real players then know that we are bluffing, and our authorities know that we get what we get request
              2. New Year day
                New Year day April 14 2018 15: 02
                +2
                Quote: Karakurt
                Vasily Ivanovich would like to believe OUR

                for some reason it is given with difficulty. Remember the Skripals. Ours stated that the "Novice" does not exist. And after that, the creator of "Novice" appeared
            2. just exp
              just exp April 14 2018 14: 13
              0
              on another forum posted a video where 7 out of 5 missiles were shot down.
              I didn’t watch all the videos, for an hour lasts, but in the comments the people who watched the whole wrote exactly that.
        3. 210ox
          210ox April 14 2018 14: 36
          +1
          Vitaliy ... These "Syrians" with a Tver dialect and crusts of the Smolensk Air Defense Academy ... Or Yaroslavl people. They "make" object-oriented air defense ..
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Of course he’s lying .. But there you need to create an echelon air defense Latest!
          And then again provoke the United States and Israel into strikes ..! Only in this way will the Russian defense system be created! soldier
          PS Not bad Syrians fought back ..! Still taught them ...
      3. dorz
        dorz April 14 2018 12: 50
        +2
        Only Iskanders or equivalent samples will help Syria.
      4. vorobey
        vorobey April 14 2018 12: 50
        +9
        Quote: Spartanez300
        It is imperative to arm the defenseless Syria, and it must be done in the very near future. That would be something to answer this earthly carcass.


        The Israeli pale-faced brothers raged here in the morning with joy .... laughing gentlemen, and now it hurts slowly ...
        1. SOF
          SOF April 14 2018 12: 57
          +6
          Quote: vorobey
          Israeli pale-faced brothers raged here in the morning with joy

          ... the dog barks - the caravan goes ...
          Spirits will still be beaten, despite the giggles of various kinds of jackal ...
      5. RASKAT
        RASKAT April 14 2018 12: 51
        +2
        It also seems to me that it is worth arming Syria S-300. As soon as C-400 arrives in our units, we will utilize C-300, you can sell them to Syria. Or at least lend for a while, while our contingent is in Syria, we will withdraw or donate, so twenty years from now laughing
        1. 210ox
          210ox April 14 2018 12: 56
          +2
          And what about the “Thors” ... It is clear that we ourselves need them .. But still.
          Quote: RASKAT
          It also seems to me that it is worth arming Syria S-300. As soon as C-400 arrives in our units, we will utilize C-300, you can sell them to Syria. Or at least lend for a while, while our contingent is in Syria, we will withdraw or donate, so twenty years from now laughing
          1. RASKAT
            RASKAT April 14 2018 13: 19
            0
            And what about the “Thors” ... It is clear that we ourselves need them .. But still.

            C-300 is first of all needed to prevent the Israelis and US Aviation from spreading over large areas and over long distances. The complex is imprisoned in many ways precisely for this (I mean С-300П, I think С-300В they don’t need it; it’s more focused on intercepting ballistic targets). But Thor is primarily focused on escorting troops, in columns on the march, etc. Yes, and they need a lot to attach to all objects or close the front.
            It would be better of course to have both this and that.
            I think so.
        2. tomket
          tomket April 14 2018 13: 40
          +3
          Quote: RASKAT
          It also seems to me that it is worth arming Syria S-300. As soon as C-400 arrives in our units, we will utilize C-300,

          This is all from the category of "We will bring down the media." Chatter and empty chatter.
        3. KERMET
          KERMET April 14 2018 14: 19
          +4
          We ourselves have the whole sky full of holes, whom do you want to dispose of there?
      6. Karakurt
        Karakurt April 14 2018 12: 52
        +8
        Quote: Spartanez300
        It is imperative to equip defenseless Syria, and it is necessary to do this in the very near future. That would be something to answer the Syrians this earthly fall.

        And what prevented this from happening before request ??? Now it's late unfortunately recourse ,
        1. vorobey
          vorobey April 14 2018 12: 53
          +8
          Quote: Karakurt
          And what prevented this from happening earlier ??? Now it’s too late unfortunately


          They tried to negotiate with Israel ... they took care of their nerves ..
          1. Karakurt
            Karakurt April 14 2018 12: 57
            +1
            Quote: vorobey
            Quote: Karakurt
            And what prevented this from happening earlier ??? Now it’s too late unfortunately


            They tried to negotiate with Israel ... they took care of their nerves ..

            All the same, there’s no sense anymore, wasting time in vain stop
            1. Simargl
              Simargl April 14 2018 13: 31
              +1
              Quote: Karakurt
              All the same already it makes no sense, in vain wasted time if for the sake of it
              ALREADY - a very important point!
              All actions should be logical.
              Now it turns out that Israel itself is to blame.
        2. Spartanez300
          Spartanez300 April 14 2018 13: 04
          +3
          As they say better late than never, these geeks no longer know the boundaries imagined themselves masters of the earth.
        3. tomket
          tomket April 14 2018 13: 41
          +1
          Quote: Karakurt
          And what prevented this from happening earlier ??? Now it’s too late, unfortunately,

          Also, that prevented the sink, bring down the media.
          1. Норд
            Норд April 14 2018 16: 49
            0
            Extremely curious. Well, well, well, well, dive, tell us the ignoramuses how you can bring down carriers that are not in the affected area?!?!? Yes, it’s time for you to appropriate the marshal for a long time. Then we will become invincibly invincible. An amazing thing will pop. Only here is it absolutely safe for characters with pouting cheeks, which have a perpendicular notion about everything, to "authoritatively" reason what and how the country could have done ...... but did not. Out.
        4. DEDPIHTO
          DEDPIHTO April 14 2018 14: 13
          0
          Quote: Karakurt
          Quote: Spartanez300
          It is imperative to equip defenseless Syria, and it is necessary to do this in the very near future. That would be something to answer the Syrians this earthly fall.

          And what prevented this from happening before request ??? Now it's late unfortunately recourse ,

          Have you ever read an article? The culprits were found, ah yai yai who would have thought, again deceived ... winked --- ,, [I would like to note that several years ago, given the urgent request of some of our Western partners, we refused to supply S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria ,,
          - said Rudskoy on the TV channel "Russia 24".
      7. Pax tecum
        Pax tecum April 14 2018 12: 55
        +10
        Syria does not have S-300 air defense systems. Russia can fix it omission

        The key word here is omission.
        S-300 air defense missile systems were needed yesterday, a year ago.
      8. antivirus
        antivirus April 14 2018 13: 17
        +1
        s300 - a trifle
        THE MAIN THING - "PEOPLE AND THE ARMY OF ONE"
        The end of the civil war is the goal for all sane people in Syria (and for Israel).
      9. Maz
        Maz April 14 2018 13: 22
        +2
        Yes, you think about it, otherwise we drive horses ...

        "103 Tomahawk and JDAMs. 71 Tomahawk down."
        One has only to think about it: 70% of the shock wave of the most modern cruise missiles - the foundation of US strike weapons - is shot down by the outdated S-200 and even older. The entire Pentagon must resign, and the head of the OKNS, J. Dunford, must shoot himself in his office if he is still an officer.
        1. BVS
          BVS April 14 2018 13: 27
          +2
          And what kind of explosions on the surface and fires in Syria captured by the Syrians?
        2. Igor V
          Igor V April 14 2018 13: 32
          +1
          Quote: Maz
          Yes, you think about it, otherwise we drive horses ...

          "103 Tomahawk and JDAMs. 71 Tomahawk down."
          One has only to think about it: 70% of the shock wave of the most modern cruise missiles - the foundation of US strike weapons - is shot down by the outdated S-200 and even older. The entire Pentagon must resign, and the head of the OKNS, J. Dunford, must shoot himself in his office if he is still an officer.

          And while there was a reserve in the form of our air defense.
        3. stone
          stone April 14 2018 15: 52
          +1
          Yes, you think about it, otherwise we drive horses ...

          Well, they don’t know that they have 70 percent shot down laughing You wrote a good word - think about it! So you think about it ...
      10. Hanokem
        Hanokem April 14 2018 13: 59
        +3
        And who will pay for it? S-300 thing is not cheap, and Syria is insolvent. Will you reduce pensions and salaries to state employees? Or write off the armament of the Russian army?
        1. K-50
          K-50 April 14 2018 14: 23
          +1
          Quote: Hanokem
          And who will pay for it? S-300 thing is not cheap, and Syria is insolvent.

          They will give our concession for the development of oil fields in eastern Syria and voila. Those places are still clean from barmaley.
      11. smart ass
        smart ass April 14 2018 14: 32
        +1
        I don’t understand why all the air defense equipment of Russia from storage sites was not sent to Syria to repel aggression 3 months ago, because the blow is predictable
      12. NEXUS
        NEXUS April 14 2018 18: 34
        0
        Quote: Spartanez300
        It is imperative to arm defenseless Syria, and it must be done in the very near future.

        This is the Kremlin’s first response to the blow. There will be a second one. As I said in the morning, Trump made a gorgeous gift for us, which the Kremlin will take full advantage of.
        Moscow is ready to return to the discussion of the supply of C-300 air defense systems to Syria. This was stated by the head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of Russia Sergey Rudskoy.

        I am sure that the TORs will put the latest series and Armor in the appendage.
      13. ask
        ask April 14 2018 19: 51
        +2
        Satan and more than one on combat duty! And the Assad button, our gut is thin! laughing
      14. Deck
        Deck April 15 2018 07: 02
        +2
        What defenseless she is when she has formidable and powerful defenders - WE.

        Russia reserves the right to shoot down all missiles in the event of US aggression against Syria, Russian Ambassador to Lebanon Alexander Zasypkin told local Al Manar television station.
        "Russia will execute its president’s statement related to any US aggression against Syria, shooting down American missiles and striking fire sources, according to Al-Manar, Russian ambassador to Lebanon, said Al-Manar," the television channel reported.
    2. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU April 14 2018 12: 49
      +11
      The supply of Syria's C-300 will not change anything even the most recent modification. After all, what can the Syrian C-300 "Favorite" do, for example, against the Tomahawks from the 150-250 km salvo 600-1000? It is necessary to deliver offensive weapons, such as Iskander, but without a range limitation, because Syria did not sign agreements on the elimination of medium-range missiles.
      In fact, even if we set C-400 Syria, the situation will not change. How is 2-3, even if the 4 of the C-400 regiment can reflect a few hundred "axes"? And this is without taking into account that the axes may not fly in the direction of C-400 Syrian air defense, where they additionally, but already close insure armor.
      1. vorobey
        vorobey April 14 2018 12: 51
        +7
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        The supply of S-300 Syria even the most recent modification will not change anything. After all, what can the Syrian S-300 Favorit do, for example, against a volley of 150-250 Tomahawks from a distance of 600-1000 km? It is necessary to put offensive weapons, such as Iskander, but without a range limit, because Syria has not signed an agreement on the elimination of medium-range missiles.



        I think according to the results of the UN Security Council which urgently convene something will be decided ..

        and roll out an ultimatum to remove all illegal aircraft from Syria within 24-48 hours laughing laughing
        1. 210ox
          210ox April 14 2018 12: 57
          +5
          Alexander ... UN Security Council?! The result is known.
          Quote: vorobey
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          The supply of S-300 Syria even the most recent modification will not change anything. After all, what can the Syrian S-300 Favorit do, for example, against a volley of 150-250 Tomahawks from a distance of 600-1000 km? It is necessary to put offensive weapons, such as Iskander, but without a range limit, because Syria has not signed an agreement on the elimination of medium-range missiles.



          I think according to the results of the UN Security Council which urgently convene something will be decided ..

          and roll out an ultimatum to remove all illegal aircraft from Syria within 24-48 hours laughing laughing
          1. vorobey
            vorobey April 14 2018 13: 00
            +4
            Quote: 210ox
            Result known


            I know what is known ... therefore, it is necessary to declare at the Security Council if the Security Council is a puppet, then we begin to play as Americans according to their own rules ...
            1. Angel_and_Demon
              Angel_and_Demon April 14 2018 13: 53
              +6
              Quote: vorobey
              I know what is known ... therefore, it is necessary to declare at the Security Council if the Security Council is a puppet, then we begin to play as Americans according to their own rules ...

              and if after such a statement they screw up again? it will not be funny anymore, from the word quite
        2. Sanche
          Sanche April 14 2018 13: 21
          +4
          Quote: vorobey
          I think according to the results of the UN Security Council which urgently convene something will be decided ..
          and roll out an ultimatum to remove all illegal aircraft from Syria within 24-48 hours


          Most likely, as usual, they will express concern. Nothing more
          1. vorobey
            vorobey April 14 2018 13: 41
            +2
            Quote: Sanche
            Most likely, as usual, they will express concern. Nothing more


            what happens to exchanges .. who knows ..
            1. K-50
              K-50 April 14 2018 14: 27
              0
              Quote: vorobey
              what happens to exchanges .. who knows ..

              There is practically no reaction, as far as I can see: oil at 73 (+ 0,9%), gold (+ 0,5%).
              In general, while a sluggish reaction. Maybe because pin dos are sleeping so far? what
        3. Simargl
          Simargl April 14 2018 13: 36
          +2
          Quote: vorobey
          I think according to the results of the UN Security Council which urgently convene something will be decided ..
          Something like this: since there is an incident - a blow to the country without a UN Security Council decision - then have to without the same decision to deliver air defense systems to that country.
          Full discredit of the body wassat - they are trying to trample us from there, now they will think ... if there is anything ...
        4. Alf
          Alf April 14 2018 14: 40
          +1
          Quote: vorobey
          and roll out an ultimatum to remove all illegal aircraft from Syria within 24-48 hours

          On which our "partners" will once again impose ... a veto, not what you all thought. And then declare, Think it over, we are concerned. Ah, worried ...
      2. Maz
        Maz April 14 2018 12: 54
        +11
        It will change, the Israelis lost one plane and are now sitting like nice little nini from their territory, no raids, just because of the Lebanese corner. laughing
      3. Herculesic
        Herculesic April 14 2018 12: 55
        +3
        A lot of things will change, and the main thing is not the absence of С300 in Syria, and why have we not used С400? This complex is a generation better and more reliable, higher protection from interference and reb, higher range of destruction of the target! Just the words Konakshenova baby talk, and unsuccessful excuse!
        1. Nevsky_ZU
          Nevsky_ZU April 14 2018 13: 02
          +2
          Quote: Herkulesich
          A lot of things will change, and the main thing is not the absence of С300 in Syria, and why have we not used С400? This complex is a generation better and more reliable, higher protection from interference and reb, higher range of destruction of the target! Just the words Konakshenova baby talk, and unsuccessful excuse!

          C-300 and C-400, let's admit, this is a threat to aircraft in essence. These systems will not be able to do anything with a massive salvo of "axes", which hundreds can fly !!! And carriers are located behind 1000 km. No one denies that a C-400 missile can knock down an “ax”, but what is the price / quality / ammunition ratio?
          You can throw spears at me and stones, but even if we put C-500 in Syria, it also will not stop the flight of hundreds of Tomahawks and we will see flaming Damascus. We also need an offensive weapon to respond to the carrier.
      4. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 14 2018 13: 05
        +1
        If 10 divisions are delivered With the 300PMU2, then the chances of intercepting all 250 missiles will be increased many times over. But the problem is that these divisions will have to be removed from our weapons - for the shortest possible strengthening of Syria’s air defense.
        1. Nevsky_ZU
          Nevsky_ZU April 14 2018 13: 20
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          If 10 divisions are delivered With the 300PMU2, then the chances of intercepting all 250 missiles will be increased many times over. But the problem is that these divisions will have to be removed from our weapons - for the shortest possible strengthening of Syria’s air defense.

          Those. this mission is impossible, both for economic reasons and for strategic ones, leaving a part of Russia, without cover. After all, 10 divisions are a lot.
          1. Guillon
            Guillon April 14 2018 15: 01
            0
            It’s much easier and more efficient to destroy cruise missile carriers! Then everything will fall into place! soldier
      5. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov April 14 2018 13: 06
        +4
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        You need to put offensive weapons, such as Iskander,

        Iskander needs to be delivered to Hamas, it will be a checkmate
        1. Hanokem
          Hanokem April 14 2018 14: 01
          +1
          Will not reach, will be destroyed on the way. Some reptiles will fly in and carry everything to hell with dogs. It happens ...
          1. bk316
            bk316 April 14 2018 14: 28
            +4
            Will not reach, will be destroyed on the way

            Well, they persuaded - not Hamas - Iran, but with the NBC.
            1. Hanokem
              Hanokem April 14 2018 15: 05
              0
              Bash to bash, then we will also have something to put to your "friends" Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan. Do you need it? Let's live together and not spoil each other
      6. Captain Pushkin
        Captain Pushkin April 14 2018 13: 19
        +1
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        It is necessary to put offensive weapons, such as Iskander, but without a range limit, because Syria has not signed agreements on the elimination of medium-range missiles.

        Syria, yes, did not sign. But Russia recognized the missile technology control regime.
        Today, the Technical Annex consists of two parts - a list of goods subject to Category I restrictions and a list of goods subject to Category II restrictions.

        Category I (consists of 2 sections) actually prohibits the transfer of missiles to other states as a whole with a maximum range of 300 km or more with a payload weight of 500 kg or more (it is possible to recalculate the payload weight into a range and vice versa). It is also forbidden to transfer complete systems (engines, control systems, software, technologies) used for complete delivery vehicles.
        1. just exp
          just exp April 14 2018 14: 22
          +1
          Well, mattresses somehow sell Poland rockets with warheads of 450 kg and a range of 900 km.
      7. Lynx33
        Lynx33 April 16 2018 11: 22
        0
        It will even change if Israel now hides its planes in the folds of the terrain before each attack and has developed a whole methodology to get around the S-200 using its shortcomings, then with the S-300 they will have to dig underground to Syria wassat and bomb popping up from there laughing
    3. Maz
      Maz April 14 2018 12: 50
      +2
      That was what the operation with the skripals and Deripaska was intended for the elites to return home. And did not shy away from Britain. Or do you think everything is so simple there. There sublayers as a section of a camberlite tube. The question is whether we should be or they will devour us. Are you worried about green pieces of paper
      1. 210ox
        210ox April 14 2018 12: 59
        +2
        Do we need them here?! "Good" is this? We won’t see any money stolen by anyone.
        Quote: Maz
        That was what the operation with the skripals and Deripaska was intended for the elites to return home. And did not shy away from Britain. Or do you think everything is so simple there. There sublayers as a section of a camberlite tube. The question is whether we should be or they will devour us. Are you worried about green pieces of paper
      2. someoneV
        someoneV April 14 2018 13: 34
        +4
        Quote: Maz
        That was what the operation with the skripals and Deripaska was intended for the elites to return home. And did not shy away from Britain. Or do you think everything is so simple there. There sublayers as a section of a camberlite tube. The question is whether we should be or they will devour us. Are you worried about green pieces of paper

        Personally, my opinion was said by our President "you didn’t listen to us, so listen now", here they are the west gave him his answer, let him know "who is the boss in the house." Everyone "creaked" and all "chemistry" is a demonstration of "soft power", and a missile strike suggests that they can still raise rates and this I’m not surprised if it flares up somewhere else on our borders. And our President can continue to call them "partners", suggesting to themselves that they are not enemies, and the lost ones who do not understand what they are doing. Then a "gift" with such politics.
      3. Hanokem
        Hanokem April 14 2018 14: 02
        +2
        Maz, how would you make an elite like you from Israel return home to their native birches?
    4. ancestors from Don
      ancestors from Don April 14 2018 12: 50
      +3
      it's time to check the noise of the flight of NATO air-to-ground missiles, the work of the "dagger", as well as the S-400 and the Pantsir air defense system, but it’s not yet evening.
    5. Andrey K
      Andrey K April 14 2018 12: 51
      +5
      Quote: serezhen-s
      ... In my opinion, it no longer makes sense to discuss these agonal political throwings ...

      How do your fiery speeches, when the current Russian authorities poured mud, relate to the topic of the article: "Syria does not have S-300 air defense systems. Russia can correct this omission" request
      You are not at the rally mongers rally negative
    6. dr.star75
      dr.star75 April 14 2018 12: 57
      0
      Unfortunately you are right. And the consequences of surrender, at best as in Ukraine, at worst as in Syria. Look at the former Yugoslavia
    7. New Year day
      New Year day April 14 2018 13: 01
      +4
      Quote: serezhen-s
      As long as the capital of our elites lies in Western banks and is denominated in dollars and euros, no serious confrontation with the West is possible in principle.

      no doubt
      Quote: serezhen-s
      Any warlike rhetoric is intended only for internal use (although, perhaps, this is also a kind of informational “tribute” to partners, they also need to somehow intimidate their civilians so that they do not rock the boat and courageously allow themselves to rob local parasites with impunity).

      just so, otherwise they won’t come to the polls and start asking unnecessary questions
      Quote: serezhen-s
      Our parasites were so pathetic that no one wants to bargain with them.

      what for? Their wallets and children abroad, you can just tame. Brzezinski has long said this.
      Quote: serezhen-s
      ... the main international law is the "law of the jungle."
      Whether we like it or not, but now on our planet there is only one master - capital and only one country expressing his will and serving as his punishing right hand - the United States.

      Is it disputable? Only in our country it is also like this: “the law is for everyone else”
  2. Andrey K
    Andrey K April 14 2018 12: 44
    +9
    It's time.
    Sergey Rudskoy:
    ... I would like to note that several years ago, given the urgent request of some of our Western partners, we refused to supply S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria ...

    Western "partners" are very grateful for such a gift.
    "Axes" with thanks are already on the land of Syria.
  3. prapor75m
    prapor75m April 14 2018 12: 45
    +3
    It was high time to do it !!!
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 April 14 2018 14: 15
      0
      Now, in order to save face and restore the situation, Syria needs to transfer a minimum of nuclear weapons ... sad
      1. Alf
        Alf April 14 2018 14: 43
        +2
        Quote: engineer74
        Now, in order to save face and restore the situation, Syria needs to transfer a minimum of nuclear weapons ... sad

        In order to save face in such a situation, one needs to resign. To the one who broadcasts from the Kremlin that "we are uhhh."
        1. engineer74
          engineer74 April 14 2018 15: 02
          0
          Right! We need V.V. Zhirinovsky! wassat
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 April 14 2018 16: 04
            +2
            The situation is not catastrophic, there is nothing to save there. Everything will take its course, sales will not slow down!
            The goal of our assistance to Syria is fully achieved.
            Syria has a combat-ready, armed army, then it will be better.
            Materially, there is technical support, all that we can afford.
            Air support for troops and air defense is there, in the most important part.
            The actions of the coalition of "friends" of the Syrian people are limited! And this is the most important, because the most dangerous!
            The "clumsy" action ... while it’s zilch, if it remains \ continue, so figs on him, he really doesn’t affect anything yet!
  4. impostor
    impostor April 14 2018 12: 46
    +3
    Syria doesn’t have much. Not yet.
    1. New Year day
      New Year day April 14 2018 12: 50
      +4
      Quote: impostor
      Syria doesn’t have much.

      maybe not because ours deliberately limit them? Pulnut on the "partners" from Israel, and we have an account. Pulnut on Americans - and we account.
      Who prevented deliveries before?
      1. NIKNN
        NIKNN April 14 2018 12: 59
        +3
        Quote: Silvestr
        Pulnut on the "partners" from Israel, and we have an account. Pulnut on Americans - and we account.

        They give us accounts without bullets ... And in the case, it may just refrain ... they are not partners, they are freeloaders ... especially Israel ...
        1. New Year day
          New Year day April 14 2018 13: 07
          0
          Quote: NIKNN
          And in the case, it may just abstain ... it's not partners, it's freeloaders ... especially Israel ...

          so that's the question! At the same time they would check how our missiles are against them.
      2. someoneV
        someoneV April 14 2018 13: 39
        0
        Quote: Silvestr
        Quote: impostor
        Syria doesn’t have much.

        maybe not because ours deliberately limit them? Pulnut on the "partners" from Israel, and we have an account. Pulnut on Americans - and we account.
        Who prevented deliveries before?

        Our government, having made concessions to Israel, by the way, was also with Iran, as far as I remember.
  5. Prahlad
    Prahlad April 14 2018 12: 47
    +6
    They do not need S-300s, but armor and Torah for hunting "new and smart missiles"
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 14 2018 12: 50
      +4
      Syria already has 40 Armor shells - where they all hang around is not clear.
  6. rotor
    rotor April 14 2018 12: 47
    +5
    If we cannot afford to fight the Americans over the Syrians, then we must provide the opportunity for the Syrians to defend themselves against US attacks.
  7. tihon4uk
    tihon4uk April 14 2018 12: 48
    +3
    You can bet, but how long will it take to prepare the calculations? time is certainly lost, but better late than never.
    1. maxxavto
      maxxavto April 14 2018 12: 52
      +5
      the calculations were prepared a long time ago when they wanted to put the s-300, but Israel pitifully asked not to do this and Dima Medvedev waved it
      1. New Year day
        New Year day April 14 2018 13: 08
        +2
        Quote: maxxavto
        and Dima Medvedev waved them

        who is that? Where did it come from?
        1. maxxavto
          maxxavto April 14 2018 14: 24
          +1
          and this is our former president, who abstained from voting on Libya and in 2012 canceled the supply of s-300
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 April 14 2018 16: 09
            +2
            It is IMPOSSIBLE to deliver in the required quantity!
            WE DO NOT HAVE EXTRA AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS, NO modern ones!
            Even the Turkish order is OUT OF PLAN, with a great tension of the forces of the manufacturer!
            WE ARE NOT THE USSR and do not produce enough air defense systems, however, and much more too!
  8. shoroh
    shoroh April 14 2018 12: 48
    +2
    but what about the shells, which are rumored to be about 40 pieces.
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 April 14 2018 12: 55
      +4
      They did not suffer .....
    2. rotor
      rotor April 14 2018 12: 58
      +2
      They stand on alert duty.
  9. dr.star75
    dr.star75 April 14 2018 12: 52
    +2
    You won’t cover the sky with discussions. And prevented our c400 from knocking them down? Did they just track them? just watched how they bomb Damascus? Well, what is the point of supplying the c300?
  10. Bell pepper
    Bell pepper April 14 2018 12: 52
    +4
    WHERE HAVE PRAISE OF A BATTERY WHICH LAST PASSED TIME KILLED HOMOGAWS ?????

    Russian air defense was also alerted.


    Yes, tell UTB to the Syrian people who were waiting for your help ......
    1. SOF
      SOF April 14 2018 13: 03
      +6
      Quote: Bulgarian Pepper
      Yes, tell UTB to the Syrian people who were waiting for your help ......

      ... the Syrian people suffered as three wounded. There is plenty of help there, from training air defense personnel and issuing target designation to them, to liberating the vast area of ​​the territory from any stench.
      But about your weapons "help" cannibal rabble, questions remain ........
      ..... Pravdorub, foreign, damn it ......
    2. K-50
      K-50 April 14 2018 14: 34
      +2
      Quote: Bulgarian Pepper
      Yes, tell UTB to the Syrian people who were waiting for your help ......

      Tell yourself to the Syrian people why you are delivering weapons and ammunition to the barmaleys. yes
  11. Diver d
    Diver d April 14 2018 12: 53
    +2
    So, the updated data on missile launches and destruction. There was a problem. Arabs claimed the downing of 17 missiles. And they just wrote from left to right. The Russians, forgetting that there is a right and left recording system, announced the downing of 71 missiles. That's the problem with what was brought down. Well, if you recall the video where the missiles go down at dawn, and the attack was in the dark, then everything falls into place. At night, the destruction did not look effective, but it was very beautiful at sunrise. And it doesn’t matter that there wasn’t anything flying over them.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh April 14 2018 12: 58
      +5
      Cool if so: 17 turned into 71 smile
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 14 2018 13: 07
        0
        Satellite images are needed to determine how many missiles have flown accurately.
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov April 14 2018 13: 10
        +4
        Quote: voyaka uh
        fun, if so: 17 turned into 71

        It’s cool if the 71 is down. It was clear that the Syrians did not sew. Hamas needs to put the Shell With 300 and Iskander. Then the United States and Israel will immediately be placed in the positions of the constellation RAC (ohm)
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh April 14 2018 13: 39
          +2
          Assad has Scuds, there are Points. With dots, he had already bombarded Israel once. Iskanders will be destroyed right before deployment. And everything will return to its current state.
          All this is dead - poultices. The mode of "artificial respiration" of Iran and Russia.
          1. 22 dmdc
            22 dmdc April 14 2018 14: 35
            0
            Scary, huh? But they will certainly stir up. Stock up diapers.
          2. bk316
            bk316 April 14 2018 14: 35
            +3
            destroyed immediately before deployment.

            Yes, Assad doesn’t - Iran needs with the NBC.
            What will you sing then?
            You hope to understand that all of your TNWs, due to the crowding of your population, will not be pulled against a dozen Iranian Iskander with SBN.
            And you will sit exactly on the fifth point and will look with hope into Assad’s eyes.
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh April 14 2018 20: 04
              0
              Iran has its own BRDS. But Iskander does not fit - it will not fly. He is a short-range BR.
              We are aware of all the threats, thank you for your attention to this topic.
          3. Maz
            Maz April 14 2018 14: 42
            +1
            Well, God forbid we pull the patient out of the Israeli-American coma. All the prerequisites are there. The state of Syria is improving every day, you are in a powerless rage. And the Kyrgyz Republic did not help. And the UAV. And vile attacks from behind Lebanon. And satellites ... won't help. Sit and do not rock the boat. And then the plush will fly from a general showdown, and then we will scrape the country and take it out of the sea. Well, you are not naked Arabs with tires against snipers and tanks.
          4. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov April 14 2018 14: 56
            0
            Quote: voyaka uh
            All this is dead - poultices. The mode of "artificial respiration" of Iran and Russia.

            A knight ride, a couple of submarines for Hamas and you are in real mourning.
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh April 14 2018 20: 06
              0
              Queen move: Sarmatian in a mine in Jerusalem, and we immediately surrender. laughing
        2. Maz
          Maz April 14 2018 15: 14
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Cool if so: 17 turned into 71 smile

          how many missiles were intercepted by Syrian air defense on each of the attacked targets: Duvali airfield - 4 out of 4, Dumeir airfield - 12 out of 12, Bley airfield - 18 out of 18, Shairat airfield - 12 out of 12, Mezze airfield (unused) - 5 out of 9, Homs airfield - 13 out of 16 (there is no strong destruction), settlements of Bars and Geramani - 7 out of 30.
          Cool, but this information is spread by the New York Times ... wink tongue
      3. Anti-Corr.
        Anti-Corr. April 14 2018 13: 19
        +3
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Cool if so: 17 turned into 71

        Quote: voyaka uh
        Arabs claimed the downing of 17 missiles. And they just wrote from left to right. The Russians, forgetting that there is a right and left recording system, announced the downing of 71 missiles. That's the problem with what was brought down

        We still don’t hear that, for example, out of 103 released, 128 were shot down, the rest didn’t hit yet 104 didn’t reach, and most importantly, neither the French nor the Shaving participated in the attack.
    2. Wilderness
      Wilderness April 14 2018 13: 06
      +1
      Yes, actually the video about the shooting down and no. They show the start of the rocket, then at high altitude (the tomahawks are at low altitude?) An explosion (self-destruction?)
    3. SOF
      SOF April 14 2018 13: 07
      +3
      Quote: Diver D
      Arabs claimed the downing of 17 missiles. And they just wrote from left to right. The Russians, forgetting that there is a right and left recording system, announced the downing of 71 missiles

      ...Yes Yes. Comfort yourself with hopes .... warriors, crap ... until next Batoklan ...
      1. Diver d
        Diver d April 14 2018 13: 13
        +1
        Believe me, I'm not amused, I'm just laughing. I recalled how, when attacking the Iranian T4, they said that five out of eight Israeli missiles were shot down, and there were clearly more than five explosions, then everything else does not smile at me, but makes me laugh. And what difference does it make to me? As new videos arrive, everything falls into place.
        1. SOF
          SOF April 14 2018 13: 38
          +3
          Quote: Diver D
          believe me

          ...I will not believe...
          Quote: Diver D
          And what difference does it make to me?

          ... and you're lying, you have a "difference", because you are neither French nor Russian .... you just have to giggle, in the attempts to show that you are better than us, those who are here, simply because you there.
          ... shallow Emelya, today is your week ....
          Well, nothing ... There will be our street on your "holiday" ....
    4. Maz
      Maz April 14 2018 13: 09
      +4
      So that you would not write there, and evil tongues slander and confirm the general failure of the attack on Syria.
      Muhammad Allush, the head of the Jaish al-Islam group, expressed his indignation at the blows of the USA, Great Britain and France, calling them a “farce” that did not lead to anything.
      Losses from hundreds of Cruise Missiles are so minimal that soon the whole world will be neighing over the coalition in the open.

      Greetings to Americans and others from a Syrian air defense soldier.
    5. New Year day
      New Year day April 14 2018 13: 12
      +2
      Quote: Diver D
      The Arabs announced the downing of 17 missiles ... The Russians, forgetting that there is a right and left recording system, announced the downing of 71 missiles.

      how simple it is, and most importantly how it sounds - 71 out of 103, atom 17 out of 103 - does not sound.
    6. Redfox11
      Redfox11 April 14 2018 14: 02
      +1
      Feykomet Arabs at the beginning of the attack, while the exact data was not said 15, give a link to 17 garbage.
  12. maxxavto
    maxxavto April 14 2018 12: 53
    0
    Quote: tihon4uk
    You can bet, but how long will it take to prepare the calculations? time is certainly lost, but better late than never.

    https://topwar.ru/15803-mi-rossiya-priostanovila-
    postavki-s-300-v-siriyu.html
  13. nikolaev
    nikolaev April 14 2018 12: 56
    +1
    And why??? After all, Russia had long had to fulfill this supply under contracts, but did not keep its promises under the influence of Israel!
  14. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh April 14 2018 12: 57
    +5
    S-300/400 are useless against the Kyrgyz Republic. Against them we need armor, complexes specializing in interceptions at low altitude.
    And, of course, means early warning. Together, something can be done.
    1. prapor75m
      prapor75m April 14 2018 13: 02
      +3
      S-300 are needed to strike at carriers, just from Lebanese airspace ....
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh April 14 2018 13: 43
        0
        We are talking about the fight against the Kyrgyz Republic, and not against aviation. S-300/400 confidently shoot down 4th generation aircraft at high and medium altitudes.
        1. K-50
          K-50 April 14 2018 14: 37
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          We are talking about the fight against the Kyrgyz Republic, and not against aviation. S-300/400 confidently shoot down 4th generation aircraft at high and medium altitudes.

          Airplanes also participated in the attack.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh April 14 2018 20: 08
            0
            Yes, the Tornado could well be brought down.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 14 2018 13: 08
      +1
      Pechora 2 can shoot down cruise missiles.
      1. Graz
        Graz April 14 2018 13: 14
        +2
        a cruise missile and silka will knock down if it flies over it, tomahawks slow missiles
    3. Maz
      Maz April 14 2018 13: 15
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      S-300/400 are useless against the Kyrgyz Republic. Against them we need armor, complexes specializing in interceptions at low altitude.
      And, of course, means early warning. Together, something can be done.

      You just need to destroy one or two carriers and that's it. How it was done with an Israeli plane. One ambush from air defense will be enough. The effect is instant.
    4. Graz
      Graz April 14 2018 13: 18
      +1
      the minimum height of 25m is the defeat of the s-300,400, so it can shoot down, the question of price is a little expensive, the c300, 400 anti-aircraft missile is probably more expensive than the tomahawk
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 14 2018 13: 23
        0
        Millions of 200 rubles probably worth it.
      2. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh April 14 2018 14: 26
        0
        The radar will detect at such a height only if the rocket flies directly over the complex.
        A little to the side and the dead zone: hills, bumps and plus: the earth is round.
  15. nikolaev
    nikolaev April 14 2018 12: 58
    +6
    This is not an “omission,” but a betrayal of Syria by the ruling clans of Russia
  16. Vol4ara
    Vol4ara April 14 2018 12: 59
    0
    Quote: rotor
    If we cannot afford to fight the Americans over the Syrians, then we must provide the opportunity for the Syrians to defend themselves against US attacks.

    This is true, by analogy with Vietnam, I thought that at the last moment the Defense Ministry would declare that it would transfer control of all Russian arms in Syria to Syrian control. In fact, nothing will change, but responsibility for sunk carriers will be removed
    1. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara April 14 2018 13: 01
      +4
      By the way, if 70% of someone’s is very good BUT! Is there a successful air defense video? Where's the ax debris photo? Without facts, it captures 0, not 70
  17. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov April 14 2018 12: 59
    +4
    Now ISIS will go on the attack, after artillery preparation .. USA!
    Hang on guys! All Russia for you .. drinks

    The answer will be, of course!
    1. Maz
      Maz April 14 2018 13: 18
      +1
      They have already climbed in KALAMUN. Trying to capture n.p. Government sources report ISIS attacks in the rear of the Syrian army in eastern Kalamun.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 14 2018 13: 24
        +4
        Now the videoconferencing system will work on them - the main thing is that they would climb out more.
  18. Bronevick
    Bronevick April 14 2018 13: 01
    +1
    It can fix it, but it won’t. The United States may be offended by this. And so much of the money deputies froze in foreign banks.
    1. Dormidont
      Dormidont April 14 2018 13: 06
      +3
      Don't talk nonsense
    2. New Year day
      New Year day April 14 2018 13: 13
      +1
      Quote: Bronevick
      And so much of the money deputies froze in foreign banks.

      Nastas Rybok is not enough for all of them
  19. Dormidont
    Dormidont April 14 2018 13: 06
    +3
    Syria needs ICBMs. But Iran and DPRK can fix it
  20. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov April 14 2018 13: 09
    +1
    Thanks to Trump, Russian anti-aircraft missile systems will now go like hot cakes
  21. K-50
    K-50 April 14 2018 13: 11
    +2
    I can imagine if Russia will transfer ALL of its S-300 to Syria in exchange for all outdated "junk", which nonetheless grounded 70% of the attacking ammunition, will rivet the S-400, then how can the Jews bomb it? belay Yes, any other aggressor? belay what
    They see and take for escort, almost from the moment of take-off. There really is no impunity, there will simply be no talk !!! request
    This is called pin dosniki Jews "podkuzmili." laughing
  22. Graz
    Graz April 14 2018 13: 12
    +1
    all old air defense systems up to s-200 and old military air defense should be transferred to the Syrians free of charge
  23. Gardamir
    Gardamir April 14 2018 13: 16
    +5
    Does anyone remember that there was an agreement with Syria to supply air defense and the money was paid. But Moscow returned the money so that Israel would not offend. Then they began to arm everyone around Syria, the Turks, Arabs, and Israelis.
    Attention question. How long have they said that our people came to Syria with their technologies that covered the entire sky of Syria with a dome, so where is it all ?.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. K-50
    K-50 April 14 2018 13: 18
    +1
    Quote: Vol4ara
    By the way, if 70% of someone’s is very good BUT! Is there a successful air defense video? Where's the ax debris photo? Without facts, it captures 0, not 70

    Please.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 14 2018 13: 25
      0
      So where are they?
  26. K-50
    K-50 April 14 2018 13: 20
    +1
    The picture did not get up. sad
    Generally already. yes
  27. shura7782
    shura7782 April 14 2018 13: 23
    +1
    Syria has no C-300 SAMs. Russia can correct this omission This is not an omission, but criminal foresight. It really bothers me. Even after the first shelling, no conclusions were drawn.
  28. friend of animals
    friend of animals April 14 2018 13: 24
    0
    At whose expense is this banquet?
    1. someoneV
      someoneV April 14 2018 13: 48
      +2
      Quote: friend of animals
      At whose expense is this banquet?

      And what difference does it make to you or you are an oligarch, it’s cool when the poor ask this question.
      1. friend of animals
        friend of animals April 14 2018 16: 10
        0
        And here are the oligarchs, and what is cool, when the poor pay for the devil’s war where?
  29. marlin1203
    marlin1203 April 14 2018 13: 31
    +3
    Quote: Nevsky_ZU
    The supply of Syria's C-300 will not change anything even the most recent modification. After all, what can the Syrian C-300 "Favorite" do, for example, against the Tomahawks from the 150-250 km salvo 600-1000? It is necessary to deliver offensive weapons, such as Iskander, but without a range limitation, because Syria did not sign agreements on the elimination of medium-range missiles.
    In fact, even if we set C-400 Syria, the situation will not change. How is 2-3, even if the 4 of the C-400 regiment can reflect a few hundred "axes"? And this is without taking into account that the axes may not fly in the direction of C-400 Syrian air defense, where they additionally, but already close insure armor.

    1 regiment - 64 missiles, 4 full-blooded regiments - 256 missiles at a time .... and reloading ... so what other questions? Amateurs got it.
    1. Oberst_71
      Oberst_71 April 14 2018 16: 08
      0
      Exactly. We managed to create some part of the air defense.
  30. BVS
    BVS April 14 2018 13: 32
    0
    Quote: dr.star75
    You won’t cover the sky with discussions. And prevented our c400 from knocking them down? Did they just track them? just watched how they bomb Damascus? Well, what is the point of supplying the c300?

    Theirs, who is this? The carriers of the Kyrgyz Republic (airborne) were far beyond the “our s400” coverage areas.
  31. Vol4ara
    Vol4ara April 14 2018 13: 32
    +2
    Quote: friend of animals
    At whose expense is this banquet?

    Yes, even if at our expense, Russia still cannot fix it without harming itself, because the complexes delivered to Syria will be gifts that could guard the Russian Federation. Here you have the games of capitalism, if you allied, you would have pulled your belts and quickly increased production of c300, and you would have built a new plant and specialists would have found, but now how many belts didn’t tighten up, you’ll spoil the air, the market economy is her mother
    1. someoneV
      someoneV April 14 2018 13: 53
      +2
      Quote: Vol4ara
      Quote: friend of animals
      At whose expense is this banquet?

      Yes, even if at our expense, Russia still cannot fix it without harming itself, because the complexes delivered to Syria will be gifts that could guard the Russian Federation. Here you have the games of capitalism, if you allied, you would have pulled your belts and quickly increased production of c300, and you would have built a new plant and specialists would have found, but now how many belts didn’t tighten up, you’ll spoil the air, the market economy is her mother

      This is not a game, this is capitalism, and it was unlikely that they behaved like that in the days of the USSR, it was not Russia, it was a "red empire" and they were afraid of it.
  32. The comment was deleted.
    1. Redfox11
      Redfox11 April 14 2018 14: 54
      0
      How did they humiliate him, if there was no effect from this blow, except for PR, and the majority of voters generally opposed the operation in Syria and, moreover, any answers (most voters are women). They only humbled their weapons.
  33. viktor.
    viktor. April 14 2018 13: 37
    0
    Totally agree! Syrians need to be supplied with supplies and trained!
  34. Dormidont2
    Dormidont2 April 14 2018 13: 39
    +3
    The Syrians need to formally put two Varshavyanka and report it in the news, and then drown troughs in the Mediterranean and Red Sea on behalf of the Syrians
  35. pasechnik
    pasechnik April 14 2018 13: 40
    0
    Good advertisement for our air defense systems. wassat
  36. sir_obs
    sir_obs April 14 2018 13: 46
    +1
    This had to be done after the first attack.
    Or at least pass off their missiles as Syrian, as in Vietnam. And shoot down all the rockets. The effect would be different.
  37. Turgon
    Turgon April 14 2018 13: 47
    +3
    if you would like to sell, you would have sold long ago, and so one chatter
  38. chudo3213
    chudo3213 April 14 2018 13: 47
    +2
    And why not urgently give Syria something anti-ship long-range? Bastion for example.
  39. Old military officer
    Old military officer April 14 2018 13: 52
    +1
    Patience, patience, and again patience. Give the fighters for shit democracy and along the way for Middle Eastern oil the opportunity to justify ... getting thinner. By the way, the command of the videoconferencing said that the participation of the French forces in the shelling of Syria is not fixed. THOSE. fired their tongues verbally, like "bang-bang", and stink.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh April 14 2018 20: 10
      0
      Yes? , and they showed how their destroyer launched 3 missiles. It is a pity that the Russian funds did not notice the launches. There is work to do.
      1. vinschu
        vinschu April 15 2018 06: 53
        0
        Listen carefully to the Russian Defense Ministry ".... the French Air Force, not fixed."
  40. Bare
    Bare April 14 2018 14: 01
    +1
    Everything is easier than steamed turnips. Shoot down one carrier rockets used in Syria and everything will fall into place.
    I suppose in North Korea they no longer want to talk about disarmament.
  41. Valery56
    Valery56 April 14 2018 14: 02
    +7
    It’s never worth scaring anyone. This is the lot of punks. He warned and did. Operation Anadyr is serious. And what is happening now in Syria is the humiliation not only of Syria, but also of Russia.
  42. tchoni
    tchoni April 14 2018 14: 07
    +5
    Oh, my mother, the S-300, in my opinion, has already turned into a paper tiger, which scares everyone ... and which has not lifted a single antelope. I mean, I didn’t bring down a single combat target. And he’s in no hurry to fix this shortcoming ... Although it was stated "we will shoot down missiles and carriers"
  43. Baby sitter
    Baby sitter April 14 2018 14: 24
    +1
    Angel_and_Demon,
    I am kind. and prefer to work for the good of the family and Russia, rather than look for fleas.
  44. Bresh
    Bresh April 14 2018 14: 25
    +1
    Who will answer me? How do we answer?
    1. Terenin
      Terenin April 14 2018 15: 08
      +6
      So far, in the international legal and diplomatic spheres, such as convening the UN Security Council, relevant official statements, strengthening the air defense group and means in Syria ... Well, to rock the unity of the EU members. Not all of them lost their brains there and do not see lies with the chemical attack.
    2. Alf
      Alf April 14 2018 16: 54
      0
      Quote: Bresch
      How do we answer?

      An expression of concern and the gathering of a gangway in the form of the UN, which has long been deciding nothing.
  45. Cradle
    Cradle April 14 2018 14: 25
    +3
    I would like to note that several years ago, given the urgent request of some of our western partners, we refused to supply anti-aircraft missile systems C-300 to Syria
    +++ And what else can accompanying ...
  46. Separ
    Separ April 14 2018 14: 25
    +4
    If we continue to think for a long time, then the next step of the mattresses is to present us with an ultimatum - to remove all our weapons and personnel from Syria within 24-48 hours (approximately)
  47. Seaflame
    Seaflame April 14 2018 14: 38
    +4
    The idle talk about the supply of Syria S-300, I heard a few years ago. And nothing has changed. Either deliver or don’t trick grandmother at conferences.
  48. Guillon
    Guillon April 14 2018 14: 42
    +1
    This question should have been resolved yesterday, and not to listen to anyone, your mother !!! am
    1. Alf
      Alf April 14 2018 15: 35
      +1
      Quote: Gillaton
      and don't listen to anyone

      Where does 118 billion green lie? Will we have the right to download?
      Putin in 2014 was already summoned to Switzerland once, hinted at, the result is recognition of powders and non-recognition of LDNR.
      And how cheeks blew, yes we, yes you ...
  49. Terenin
    Terenin April 14 2018 14: 55
    +8
    Quote: Vadim237
    Now we’ll remove several C 300 divisions from our armament and send them to Syria as gifts.

    It’s time to finally understand that today Syria is the line of defense of Russia!
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 14 2018 17: 10
      0
      Let Iran harness for them to the fullest - Syria is now heavily, financially and politically for Russia.
      1. Terenin
        Terenin April 14 2018 18: 57
        +6
        Quote: Vadim237
        Let Iran harness for them to the fullest - Syria is now heavily, financially and politically for Russia.

        Let Iran harness it, it's none of our business. Russia has only two ways. The first is to be a superpower and the second is to be destroyed. There is no third! So, (at least for the same investments by other countries) a superpower, by definition, should have real influence and military control in another region of the world where there are hydrocarbons. But, just like that, no one will accept the “superpower club”, it’s necessary to share it. For this, Russia has to fight.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 14 2018 19: 45
          0
          The time will come and Russia will be one of its own pockets; for 15 years it will restore all of Syria.
          1. Terenin
            Terenin April 14 2018 22: 58
            +5
            Quote: Vadim237
            The time will come and Russia will be one of its own pockets; for 15 years it will restore all of Syria.

            But from my pocket I would not want to. This is a pure question of the economic bloc of the government, not the military. And, by the way, Syria has something to pay.
  50. The comment was deleted.