I did not extort a bribe on the stairs, - Ulyukaev went through the stage

104
Former Minister of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukayev will be sent to a strict regime colony within the next 10 days. The fact is that the Moscow City Court upheld the earlier decision regarding the ex-official of the government rank. Recall that Ulyukaev was sentenced to 8 years of imprisonment and a fine of 130 million rubles. However, there are some innovations in the final verdict. Thus, the court excluded from the sentence a clause that prohibited the convict from holding a bureaucratic position after serving the sentence.

On the eve of the trial, Igor Sechin, the head of Rosneft, came to the court for a hearing on the case of Ulyukayev.



Sechin quotes TASS:
I was hoping that the court of first instance would accept my written testimony, unfortunately, this did not happen. Therefore, as soon as the opportunity arose, I came to court. For me it was a matter of principle, because I wanted my testimony to be taken into account by the court. I am the main witness, and for me it was a matter of honor. I felt my responsibility to ensure that the fight against corruption in our country received an additional result, and therefore came to court.


According to Sechin, Ulyukayev extorted a bribe from him, the amount of which he himself (the then minister) identified.

The head of Rosneft said that extortion 2-s millions of dollars took place "on the stairs" during the transition to the hall of negotiations.

Ulyukaev, answering the question whether there was such a thing, declared literally the following: “it is absurd to think that a bribe can be extorted on the stairs, surrounded by people”.

Ulyukaev:
I came to the office to Sechin, as he promised to treat me with wine, which I never tried (...) The sentence is built on the principle of OBS - one woman said.


I did not extort a bribe on the stairs, - Ulyukaev went through the stage


At this, the prosecutor noted:
How many, according to Mr. Ulyukaev, were there bottles of wine in the bag if she weighed about 22 kg and he barely carried her to the car? ..

Which colony Ulyukaev will go to is not reported yet.
104 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    April 13 2018 06: 14
    A good lesson for the Ulyukaevs and other "Gaidar", but not enough, the next one went.
    1. +5
      April 13 2018 06: 22
      All the oligarchs together with Ulyukaev on the bunk Yes .
      1. +7
        April 13 2018 06: 24
        Well gone. God forbid not the last
      2. +4
        April 13 2018 06: 26
        It is necessary to bet on when he will be released with a "clear" conscience.
        1. +3
          April 13 2018 07: 24
          Quote: ul_vitalii
          It is necessary to bet on when he will be released with a "clear" conscience.

          It won’t come soon - they appointed him a scapegoat, of course, not innocently, but ....
        2. +3
          April 13 2018 07: 51
          Quote: ul_vitalii
          It is necessary to bet on when he will be released with a "clear" conscience.

          Apparently freedom is just around the corner, that’s the ban on the bureaucratic position was removed ... So, it’s to steer, this still valuable frame for the system after the bench .. Reserve, p.
        3. +4
          April 13 2018 08: 05
          Vitaly, good morning. It’s clear even without bets. Now he will quickly return millions, for him this is not a problem, and in a year and a half he will be released for health reasons ... It’s possible earlier, but the procedure itself ... what
          Quote: ul_vitalii
          It is necessary to bet on when he will be released with a "clear" conscience.
          1. +3
            April 13 2018 08: 20
            Quote: 210ox
            Vitaly, good morning. It’s clear even without bets. Now he will quickly return millions, for him this is not a problem, and in a year and a half he will be released for health reasons ... It’s possible earlier, but the procedure itself ... what
            Quote: ul_vitalii
            It is necessary to bet on when he will be released with a "clear" conscience.

            Dima, hello hi For the beaten two unbeaten give, a place in the cage and further prosperity is provided to him in his environment. Victim of a regime or rival firm, as you like.
      3. +2
        April 13 2018 06: 30
        Not to the bunks, but to the wall
      4. +4
        April 13 2018 06: 53
        Ulyukaev is not an oligarch, he is an official. (former) The oligarchs are engaged in "business", make a fortune and do not hide it, unlike a person who was in the public service.
        1. +3
          April 13 2018 08: 47
          Quote: Orionvit
          Ulyukaev is not an oligarch, he is an official. (former) The oligarchs are engaged in "business", make a fortune and do not hide it, unlike a person who was in the public service.

          He sat not for a bribe, but for greed. For a minister of this level, $ 2 million is simply an “insult to status”, and he also violated unwritten rules - feed on the side and do not touch the domineering ie filter personal interests and do not go into state ones. Well, if the status was lowered from a minister to a rat, then this should be removed from the deck as a warning to the "reformers" with the general message - "Are you really out there?" The promise was not heard, or it was not understood in the sense, but the "reformers" excitedly hiccuped after the loss of the "colleague of Gaidar’s" and continued in the same spirit as the previous 25 years to "blow" towards the West, as if there had been no what sanctions and deterioration of the latter’s relations with Russia, persistently pushing the topic of a new wave of seizing state assets and imitating the vigorous activity of import substitution, equipping this process with such paper obstacles that the process stalled. Now they (the reformers) were hit through the arrest of the Magomedov oligarchs, hinting that the coalescence of power and the oligarchy is in the interests of the state. officials are unacceptable. This time it seems that this message has already been heard, but late. The pro-Westerners now look like a pale mole, forgetting what privatization really means and what kind of state assets “interfere” with the state. A large replacement of the government is coming. Ulyukaev has two options - he will go either to Mordovia or to Komi. In Komi, in the city of Pechora it is cold and far - 1,5 thousand km from the golden-headed. In Mordovia it’s warm and closer to Moscow, which means more frequent dates. Probably all the same, the second option is ministerial.
          1. 0
            April 13 2018 09: 00
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            he also violated unwritten rules

            That is, if you do not violate the "unwritten rules", then you can take? In the sense of feeding on the side.
            feed on the side and do not touch the domineering i.e. filter personal interests and do not go into state
            I understood correctly?
            1. +3
              April 13 2018 09: 22
              Quote: Orionvit
              That is, if you do not violate the "unwritten rules", then you can take? I mean to feed on the side. Did I understand correctly?
              No, it’s not possible, but they understood correctly. Do not confuse personal wool with the state. If Ulyukaev milked third-party companies (as is done all over the world), no one would have noticed, and he decided to cut wool from a state ram, which, in fact, works for the state and made a deal in the interests of the state. I’ve completely lost my impudence.
              1. 0
                April 13 2018 09: 27
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                how is it done all over the world

                And what do we care about the rest of the world? A man is put on the post and convicted of power. It is clear that all are not angels, but how much does a person need? Foaming the whole world, they say everywhere, then we wring our hands and complain loudly, they say, where the world is heading.
                1. +3
                  April 13 2018 10: 27
                  Quote: Orionvit
                  And what do we care about the rest of the world? A man is put on the post and convicted of power. It is clear that all are not angels, but how much does a person need? Foaming the whole world, they say everywhere like that, then we wring our hands and complain loudly, they say, where the world is heading

                  Why do you read me notations? I myself know all this very well. I know that many companies make the costs of giving kickbacks to the budget when promoting and implementing economic projects for the purchase of the same lobby in the structures on which the decision depends. This is one of the elements of corruption that exists in all countries of the world. The problem is that somewhere power is actively fighting it, and somewhere corruption itself is power, as it is now in Urkain.
          2. +4
            April 13 2018 09: 49
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            He sat not for a bribe, but for greed. For a minister of this level, $ 2 million is simply an “insult to status,” and he violated unwritten rules.

            He was simply framed, and it’s very rude. The main witness, on whose testimony the whole charge was based, generally insulted the court with his absence. Interestingly, this did not prevent our fair justice from conviction. Although the most important points in the case have not been proven:
            !) Ulyukaev didn’t take money into his hands, and might not know what was in his bag (he didn’t take it either, was carried by Sechin’s guard).
            2) Ulyukaev didn’t demand money (He only demanded from Sechin’s words. Can Sechin’s bare words be proof, especially since he didn’t come at all?).
            So what kind of a bribe is it if a person did not pick up money and did not demand it? Glory to the Russian justice, the most strict and fair in the world! Serdyukov will confirm!
            I have no sympathy for Ulyukaev. I am sure that he is a thief, since there are no others. But it was a setup of pure water.
            1. +3
              April 13 2018 10: 17
              Quote: Stas157
              I have no sympathy for Ulyukaev. I am sure that he is a thief, since there are no others. But it was a setup of pure water.

              Sir, I know what operative-search activity is not from films and detectives, but from practice. With a poor evidence base, a good lawyer will ruin any business. I don’t think that Ulyukaev had a problem hiring a seasoned lawyer to defend him in court, and even more so, I’m not talking about the support from the liberal camp. Simply, a person first believed in his immunity, and then in impunity, for which he paid.
              1. +2
                April 13 2018 12: 11
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                Sir, I know what operative-search activity is not from films and detectives, but from practice.

                So explain to us, in this case:
                Quote: Stas157
                what kind of a bribe is it if a person did not pick up money and did not demand it?

                There is no evidence whatsoever other than Sechin’s testimony. If you have other information, please be kind enough to provide it.
                1. +2
                  April 13 2018 16: 04
                  Quote: Stas157
                  So explain to us, in this case:
                  Quote: Stas157
                  what kind of a bribe is it if a person did not pick up money and did not demand it?

                  These hands were given to you))) Now it’s not at all a problem to transfer a bunch of dibs from one account to another, excluding personal contact, but this does not mean that this is not a bribe. Gone are the days when labeled bills with rewritten numbers served as confirmation, which by the way does not always work. There was a case when a “man” asked for only five days with one piece of paper. This five-day photograph was taken in profile and in full view, the word bribe was written so that it would later light up like a searchlight and charge into the case. It was in the cafe. But he didn’t take it with his pens, he says to the dad / go, they say, buy a couple of cups of coffee for yourself and me for this piece of paper, and bring the change, but don’t lose it on the way))) As a result, he has clean babos on his pocket minus 2 cups of coffee, and a charged banknote at the checkout counter))) And what will you show him? The opera then tortured to buy out this bill from the cash desk and compensate the cafe for the loss. Documentation has become more difficult, my friend, and therefore it is necessary to approach the process with all responsibility and creatively, or you can sit down on the bench for falsification.
                  1. +3
                    April 13 2018 17: 17
                    Quote: Nyrobsky
                    Quote: Stas157
                    So explain to us, in this case:
                    Quote: Stas157
                    what kind of a bribe is it if a person did not pick up money and did not demand it?

                    These hands were given to you)))

                    Ulyukaev, in addition, as he did not take money into his hands, he still did not ask for that money. Sechin (his security guard) simply threw a bag of money into the car, saying that there were papers and sausages (this was recorded on the recorder, there was no mention of money there!). It turns out that you can put anyone for a bribe, only on the basis that he was thrown some sort of bag. Ulyukaev didn’t even open that bag.
                    1. +2
                      April 13 2018 18: 52
                      Quote: Stas157
                      Ulyukaev, in addition, as he did not take money into his hands, he still did not ask for that money. Sechin (his security guard) simply threw a bag of money into the car, saying that there were papers and sausages (this was recorded on the recorder, there was no mention of money there!). It turns out that you can put anyone for a bribe, only on the basis that he was thrown some sort of bag. Ulyukaev didn’t even open that bag.

                      To Ulyukaev’s disappointment, he was not the only one to write to the recorder. Judging by your participation, Ulyukaev lost a lot (8 years and 130 million rubles) due to the fact that he did not invite you to be his lawyer. All the best. The topic is closed. hi
        2. +1
          April 13 2018 09: 30
          Quote: Orionvit
          Ulyukaev is not an oligarch, he is an official. (former) The oligarchs are engaged in "business", make a fortune and do not hide it, unlike a person who was in the public service.

          And the oligarchs are thieves, and officials, and big businessmen. Honestly, hardly anyone got rich
          1. 0
            April 13 2018 09: 36
            Quote: Alber
            Honestly, hardly anyone got rich

            "By righteous labor, you won’t build stone chambers." In my opinion, capitalism in Russia (which many dreamed of in the late 80s), you want to "earn" (make) money, go into business. But the question is that Ulyukaev was a civil servant, and this, by definition, imposes restrictions. Either you serve the state (for a considerable salary), or you make money, everything is simple. You do not understand common truths, greed is stuck in jail, and rightly so.
      5. 0
        April 13 2018 12: 49
        Quote: Spartanez300
        All the oligarchs together with Ulyukaev on the bunk
        And what have some oligarchs to do with it? It's a whole Minister! First, since the time of Peter No. 1 (i.e., will the GDP be cooler? wink )!
    2. 0
      April 13 2018 06: 36
      With such actions, the lessons are distributed not by the Ulyukaevs, but by the "herd" ... - "Look, they say, what punishments should be given to state criminals for sub-shooting crimes." The point is not even that he allegedly extorted a bribe, the fact is that this one got messed up in involvement in the occupation power. "Justice", by the way, is also part of the occupation administration.
    3. +2
      April 13 2018 06: 39
      The fact of the matter is that little. This list of "Gaidar" - "Ulyukaev" is so huge. And they go continue to steal with lards brazenly wagging.
      1. 0
        April 13 2018 08: 18
        Quote: Nikolai Petrov
        And they go continue to steal with lards brazenly wagging.

        This gentleman tried to get rich for only 2 million dollars. So in this case, we must say - "LAMAM", "lemons." stop
        Two lemons greens .... what ... yeah ... eight years ....
        It’s scary to think what awaits those who steal “LARDS” belay
        wink laughing
    4. +2
      April 13 2018 07: 04
      Just for the sake of showing off, they leaked the brow without a patron. That's when Chubais sits down then and we will talk about the rule of law.
    5. dSK
      +1
      April 13 2018 07: 16
      Quote: Balu
      A good lesson for the Ulyukaevs

      The TV set showed the plot when Medvedev “offered” Ulyukaev to the ministers, asked him how about the “activities” in the Central Bank. Ulyukaev answered - everything is fine, only a little “drive”. Dmitry Anatolyevich joked - “drive” will be in abundance. Ulyukaev was brought up by a habit from his former place of work, where he was fed by supervised regional banks.
    6. 0
      April 13 2018 14: 22
      Yes, for just one word about raising the retirement age, he has never been sorry!
  2. +1
    April 13 2018 06: 20
    Execution cannot be pardoned. How much more does it take to transplant, so that people change their minds, stop thumping, steal and begin to move their brains. There must be a Head, not an extension of the neck. The treasury is not bottomless. But there is always a rope and an evil policeman, sooner or later.
    Sorry, Friday.
    1. +2
      April 13 2018 06: 30
      Such as planting a few ulukaev, a capital punishment is needed # he brought too much damage to the country.
      1. dSK
        +1
        April 13 2018 07: 24
        Quote: Lynx33
        need the highest measure

        Return confiscations the penalty is only for the last "caught" bribe, and very often the fines are canceled on "appeals".
      2. 0
        April 13 2018 08: 22
        Quote: Lynx33
        Such as planting a few ulukaev, a capital punishment is needed # he brought too much damage to the country.

        What are you saying, Sergey! Then the demographic collapse awaits us.
    2. +2
      April 13 2018 06: 55
      Quote: Fedorov
      so that people change their minds, stop thumping, steal and start to move their brains.

      Something you all have in one heap. In my opinion, unlike stealing, plumping and stirring brains, this is a personal matter for everyone. Of course, while the rest does not bother.
      1. 0
        April 13 2018 07: 16
        That's right, on the heap. But try to figure it out. This is a complicated process.
        And you need to start with yourself. Fathers-grandfathers without affecting.
        1. +1
          April 13 2018 07: 45
          Quote: Fedorov
          That's right, on the heap. But try to figure it out. This is a complicated process.
          And you need to start with yourself. Fathers-grandfathers without affecting.

          Parenting is absolutely true, it is necessary to temper willpower in order to overcome one’s weaknesses, which can harm not only oneself, but also others. We are rational people and should think, and not just rely on instinct. hi
    3. +3
      April 13 2018 07: 10
      I do not want to offend you, but your speech is good only from the outside! And you get the same opportunities as Ulyukaev, maybe you would also take it! And it can be on a large scale! Yes, and commentators too.
      It is easy to refuse a bribe when not offered!
      1. +2
        April 13 2018 07: 36
        Quote: K.A.S.
        I do not want to offend you, but your speech is good only from the outside! And you get the same opportunities as Ulyukaev, maybe you would also take it! And it can be on a large scale! Yes, and commentators too.
        It is easy to refuse a bribe when not offered!

        Here's how to think, if my account would be wealthy, why should I lose everything for the sake of a small part. What is the point of taking when there is everything and the opportunity not to take is much easier. This is banal greed, neither brains nor anything else matters; education alone is important. Apparently used to taking it and it was not a habit, but a way of life, greed, it slowly takes root that you can’t figure it out later, stole it or got what it deserves. hi
        1. +2
          April 13 2018 08: 44
          and what account is wealthy? and if this small part is half your state?
          For example, I can say to myself that if there is no control, I will take it! and if there is control, I’ll do it so that others will take it but send it off! and it makes no difference to me what the order in the yard, cap or social will be! In order to reduce the possibilities of bribe-takers' officials, it is necessary to reduce their chances to solve something !!! now many officials are shaken so they have firms registered for relatives! and we won’t be able to cope with any control and shootings !!!
          1. +1
            April 13 2018 09: 07
            Quote: K.A.S.
            In order to reduce the possibilities of bribe-takers' officials, it is necessary to reduce their chances to solve something !!! Now many officials are shaken so they have firms registered for relatives! and we won’t be able to cope with any control and shootings !!!
            Fines or forfeiture in the amount of damage and steal as much as you want, then all the relatives will trade predictions with the gypsies at the metro, a relative in prison will study the lawYes... There are methods of struggle and quite effective. Not everyone was executed in the USSR, but it was impossible to confiscate everyone and it was impossible to hide from relatives, there was revenue control, that’s where the thread was to be cut ... There were special accounts, authorities to control the financial turnover of cash and valuables, now it is, but it’s just control, the function of punishment was taken away (seizure of undeclared means and values ​​acquired in a known way). Yes It’s a pity that there isn’t one, much would have changed and there would have been more smart .... laughing
            1. +1
              April 13 2018 10: 30
              But will these authorities that will control the bribes not be taken, or will supervisory authorities be needed over them too? And over these too?
              And about the Soviet Union it’s a fairy tale enough to recall the guilds!
              1. +1
                April 13 2018 10: 52
                Quote: K.A.S.
                But will these authorities that will control the bribes not be taken, or will supervisory authorities be needed over them too? And over these too?
                And about the Soviet Union it’s a fairy tale enough to recall the guilds!

                But they didn’t take it then, the tower of the star, it’s hard to imagine a picture of how a KGB officer takes a bribe ....
                1. 0
                  April 13 2018 11: 01
                  Well, I don’t know about the KGB employee, but the employees of the OBHSS agreed with the director when checking the store! They took it and how! otherwise how to explain the existence of the guilds or the cotton business (other)
                  about the KGB employees, (honest), but didn’t you think about why many of them got a good new life? I personally know one (now deceased), about how his start-up capital has grown (rather big), the story is silent
                  1. +1
                    April 13 2018 11: 03
                    Quote: K.A.S.
                    history is silent

                    I do not argue they were, just all the same they stole less and not so brazenly ....
            2. +1
              April 13 2018 10: 34
              Quote: XXXIII
              Not everyone was executed in the USSR, but it was impossible to confiscate everyone and it was impossible to hide from relatives, there was revenue control, this is where you need to cut the thread
              - from my relative - he beat the cattle in the villages; in 1988 there were 190 (HUNDRED AND NINety THOUSANDS !!!!) - The VAZ-2105 then cost 6 rubles,
              was listed as a watchman on a collective farm (as in © BR) —Wife went to guard the office ....
              The OBHSS / KGB never came to him - like where did you get the money ???
              1. +1
                April 13 2018 10: 48
                Quote: your1970
                - from my relative - he beat the cattle in the villages; in 1988 there was 190 on a book (HUNDRED NINety THOUSAND !!!!) - the VAZ-000 then cost 2105 rubles,
                was listed as a watchman on a collective farm (as in © BR) —Wife went to guard the office ....
                The OBHSS / KGB never came to him - like where did you get the money ???

                So here it wasn’t how much it was, but how I could spend it, disclose the income in this way, I clearly did not boast in the village that I could buy 100 new Lada ..... No.
                1. 0
                  April 13 2018 12: 36
                  Quote: XXXIII
                  Quote: your1970
                  - from my relative - he beat the cattle in the villages; in 1988 there was 190 on a book (HUNDRED NINety THOUSAND !!!!) - the VAZ-000 then cost 2105 rubles,
                  was listed as a watchman on a collective farm (as in © BR) —Wife went to guard the office ....
                  The OBHSS / KGB never came to him - like where did you get the money ???

                  So here it wasn’t how much it was, but how I could spend it, disclose the income in this way, I clearly did not boast in the village that I could buy 100 new Lada ..... No.
                  -remember-in the village ALL ALL ABOUT ALL always knew and will know - this is not a city for you (where you can not know a neighbor in the stairwell) ...
                  In addition, in the 80s he already had 2 cars - the Gaz-69 and the three luxury cars. I went to the south every year to rest, the house was sweet by the standards,
                  1. +1
                    April 13 2018 13: 54
                    Quote: your1970
                    -remember-in the village EVERYTHING ABOUT EVERYONE EVERYTHING has always been known and will know — this is not a city for you (where you may not know a neighbor in the stairwell) ...
                    In addition, in the 80s he already had 2 cars - the Gaz-69 and the three luxury cars. I went to the south every year to rest, the house was sweet by the standards,

                    Yes, there were Soviet fists, which were already there, but still there were mores, decency, they did not run abroad with the loot. The relative was probably an exemplary business executive, he received letters of honor ...... And now, they don’t boast about a healthy family, but how many yachts and w ... were .... crying
    4. 0
      April 13 2018 10: 27
      Quote: Fedorov
      what would people thought better of it stopped thumping, stealing and began to move their brains.
      -3 weeks ago, we drunk crashed into the trash and the corpse burned down - there really was nothing to bury. Recognized? Yeah .... this morning a lamppost ran out onto the road — drunk at the wheel — to death ...
      No one else ALIEN Death / Prison didn’t stop- "I’m not like that! I’m not like everyone else! It doesn’t apply to me! I am immortal, everyone will die, but I will not !!"
  3. +3
    April 13 2018 06: 21
    It’s not my fault ... smile I just touched the suitcase.
    It’s his own fault ... he was in operational development and inherited enough for the trial.

    Well, to be honest, any person can be smeared with suspicion of a bribe or drugs with the help of cheap techniques ... Ulyukaev as the last sucker was seduced by this ... ndaaaa and also the minister ... and where only his brains are.
    1. +5
      April 13 2018 06: 32
      hi I found something to touch, put my hand in my pocket and touch as much as I like.
    2. +2
      April 13 2018 06: 57
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Ulyukaev as the last sucker seduced

      You still say that he is not to blame for anything and he was simply framed.
      1. +1
        April 13 2018 07: 15
        You still say that he is not to blame for anything and he was simply framed.

        smile
        But what ... what kind of person in their right mind when it comes to millions of dollars will be so rude to substitute ... they literally stuck a suitcase in his hands and he went for it ... another thing strikes me ... as a person of such a level could understand basic things. belay
        1. 0
          April 13 2018 08: 36
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          ... Ulyukaev, as the last sucker was seduced by this ... ndaaaa and also the minister ... and where only his brains are.

          lol Alexei, listen to you ... "Eh! The dude burned out. He burned out at the workplace .. Here he’s going! Well, who is doing it! They would have caught me figs ... Here is the ram! There isn’t enough evil!" laughing
          1. +2
            April 13 2018 09: 09
            So he lost his nose, it was for him the usual work routine. Well, I wish you success, dear. It remains only to find who will give hi smile
            1. 0
              April 13 2018 09: 32
              Quote: ul_vitalii
              as he lost his nose, it was for him the usual work routine. Well, I wish you success, dear. It remains only to find who will give

              Vitaly, yours hi addressed to me? winked
              1. +2
                April 13 2018 13: 21
                Quote: Civilian
                Quote: ul_vitalii
                as he lost his nose, it was for him the usual work routine. Well, I wish you success, dear. It remains only to find who will give

                Vitaly, yours hi addressed to me? winked

                Gennady hi , answered with a joke to your joke, if offended, then I'm sorry, nothing personal, with respect! hi drinks
                1. +1
                  April 14 2018 00: 06
                  Quote: ul_vitalii
                  answered with a joke to your joke, if offended, then I'm sorry, nothing personal, with

                  smile Thanks for your kind words drinks
  4. +1
    April 13 2018 06: 21
    I think in a couple of years they will let him go, and even in his comfortable cell for 8 years it's not a problem to sit out
    1. +3
      April 13 2018 06: 41
      Quote: Yak28
      8 years in his comfortable cell

      Ulyukaev! go out, date five minutes. (remembered something) laughing
    2. 0
      April 13 2018 08: 44
      2 years and 27 days. By May 9, 2020, a big amnesty is coming, "..I think so ..."
  5. +7
    April 13 2018 06: 22
    Both had to be planted. Both are messed up.
    1. +4
      April 13 2018 06: 29
      Both had to be planted. Both are messed up.

      Half of Medvedev’s government can be planted safely smile there is compromising evidence on everyone ... the oligarchs in the government are nonsense.
      But we have the features of the national government smile he fought off the team and burned his wings, which means you will fall to the deep bottom of the deepest gorge.


      Sorry for the bird crying
    2. 0
      April 13 2018 07: 38
      I agree with you. It is hard to believe that Ulyukaev could refuse bribes. After all, she was offered by her closest friend. Dark story without evidence.
  6. +8
    April 13 2018 06: 24
    Ulyukaev is now bubbling and probably indignant inside. Well, how come. "Around everyone took and take. And he should sit alone."
    I felt my responsibility to ensure that the fight against corruption in our country received an additional result, and therefore came to court.
    I just can’t believe my eyes. This is a mirage! And kickbacks for the purchase of equipment, services, furniture there are different, and so on. In state-owned companies and with a large share of the state. Is corruption? Sechin will probably not want to say anything about this laughing
  7. +2
    April 13 2018 06: 29
    A monstrously unfair sentence was handed down to Ulyukaev. He would have to hang out in a loop, and he would fatten on state grubs
  8. +1
    April 13 2018 06: 40
    The manners of "them" among themselves ... just do not shoot. wink
  9. +1
    April 13 2018 06: 42
    Quote: Lynx33
    Such as planting a few ulukaev, a capital punishment is needed # he brought too much damage to the country.

    It's like a freebie at the expense of the state overshadows the brain. The self-preservation instinct is completely blocked. In China, they shoot for such deeds, despite their positions and ranks, and they damn steal one thing, though not on such a scale.
  10. +1
    April 13 2018 06: 44
    Was the wine of the famous Shmurdyak and Sinka company? ?? wassat You read such nonsense, and you are amazed that we tried to deal with the economy for creatures, but it obviously did not come into their hands, hence all the troubles! belay fool
    1. 0
      April 13 2018 08: 18
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Was the wine of the famous Shmurdyak and Sinka company? ?? wassat You read such nonsense, and you are amazed that we tried to deal with the economy for creatures, but it obviously did not come into their hands, hence all the troubles! belay fool

      Yes, to hell they need what kind of economy. They are out of the ordinary working hours of wine tasting during working hours ... Well, like ...
  11. +5
    April 13 2018 07: 10
    they ate Alexey Valentinych in an undercover fight. The story of how a minister personally carries around twenty-two kilograms of money is designed for the average man, so that in his one crinkle a simple chain is lined up: “Yes, he’s like a traffic cop, I took a bribe from me yesterday!”) You could still believe it in times of “a box from under Xerox. " but not now
    1. +3
      April 13 2018 07: 28
      I remembered one movie, or rather a quote from the movie - ,, SDD-gobble up each other ,,
      Spiders in the jar ..
    2. +1
      April 13 2018 08: 22
      I totally agree. I won’t say that Ulyukaev would be nice to me, for sure he, like the bulk of the ministers, has something to put in, but it really stinks of a setup. Does the Minister PERSONALLY go for a bribe in two lyam bucks in plain sight? If so, then he should not be sent to prison, but to Durkee.
    3. +1
      April 13 2018 08: 53
      Quote: ivan0vitch
      how the minister personally carries with twenty-two kg of money,

      laughing I once weighed 24 kg from the store to the house - I evaporated. But the kettlebell is not a briefcase, more compact, does not knock on bows, it is much easier to carry. Or maybe Ulyukaev is a sportsman? And what? Charge, jogging daily. Friends with sports.
      1. +1
        April 13 2018 09: 19
        In my opinion, not earlier than the day before yesterday, Dmitry Anatolyevich, speaking in the State Duma, said that in Russia 50 million people regularly play sports), so maybe you guessed it, Ulyukaev from these athletes)
  12. 0
    April 13 2018 08: 14
    I arrived at the office of Sechin, because he promised to treat me with wine, which I had never tried

    Gourmet! Well now it remains to visit places where I have never been! Eight years, help yourself ...
  13. +1
    April 13 2018 08: 23
    Finally! It happened, Sechin appeared in court! And not a year has passed. And with Ulyukaev it’s probably clear that, according to parole or amnesty, he will come out and attach him again.
    1. +2
      April 13 2018 10: 10
      Quote: andrej-shironov
      by parole or amnesty will come out and attach again.

      for which they canceled the verdict regarding the ban on "holding posts." Alexey Valentinovich is 62 years old. Plus 8, it turns 70 years "on call". What posts should he care about? For many, this would mean "lifelong." Hence the conclusion - it will be up to 65 and immediately into battle, to compensate for the losses.
      1. +2
        April 13 2018 10: 18
        What are the losses? The economy remained untouched, nothing was confiscated, everything was earned by honest overwork.
        1. +2
          April 13 2018 10: 30
          Quote: uskrabut
          What are the losses? The economy remained untouched, nothing was confiscated, everything was earned by honest overwork.

          Well, a fine of 130 lyam in an “institution” does not even earn a strict one.
          I suppose that he already had a “track number” for the future race announced so that he would not be indignant too loud and too informative.
          1. +3
            April 13 2018 10: 32
            Quote: Civilian
            Well, a fine of 130 lyam in an “institution” does not even earn a strict one.

            As Chebays would say: "130 lyamas? Yes, it's pocket money!"
  14. 0
    April 13 2018 08: 40
    Good news in the morning)))
    Strange elections were held, but the justice machine did not die out ...
  15. +2
    April 13 2018 08: 46
    The ancestors, for such Ulyukaevs / and even Sechins, if they get there / Established a Frontal place. But Loshik will go to Sunny Mordovia, he will read Homera a couple of years, charade-scanwords. The worst thing is if the refrigerator breaks in the summer / the beer is warm / or the fumitox ends. An amnesty for his article will be invented, and will be released. Maybe he got into an argument, if he lacked drive ..
  16. +3
    April 13 2018 09: 07
    there is a feeling of some understatement in this story. Or is it a setup with the reduction of personal accounts, or Ulyukaev is so stupid. It is a pity that he is alone on the bench
    1. +1
      April 13 2018 13: 11
      In my opinion, an open base. But Sechin persuaded him to come over the phone for a long time (the record was published), and affectionately blurted out. Sechin presented such heavy bags with sausage and wine to many and regularly.
      But the fact that he came - d - y - ra_k, of course.
      1. 0
        April 13 2018 14: 47
        smile Or a brawler in the power of one group of oligarchs on the other. But the people are not interested, and they both row from the people to themselves. Who will now say that our government is not oligarchic?
        1. 0
          April 13 2018 14: 59
          Quote: voyaka uh
          In my opinion, an open base.

          most likely so
        2. +2
          April 13 2018 15: 01
          Quote: andrej-shironov
          But the people are not interested

          I do not agree. When an official is imprisoned, it is always pleasant to the people, regardless of why the official was tied.
          1. +1
            April 13 2018 15: 19
            smile Sylvester, well, to the mass of people it may be interesting in that context that; here he is a thief! But the interest of the crowd is quickly passing, however, like the love for the leader. wink
  17. +1
    April 13 2018 09: 37
    why fine? when there should be a complete confiscation of property, and yet there is no license to take office, this is strange, the criminal cannot hold such posts, probably, as usual, after a couple of years of imprisonment he will fall under an amnesty and begin to “earn” a new one
  18. +1
    April 13 2018 09: 40
    Quote: Alexander.
    why fine? when there should be a complete confiscation of property, and yet there is no license to take office, this is strange, the criminal cannot hold such posts, probably, as usual, after a couple of years of imprisonment he will fall under an amnesty and begin to “earn” a new one

    and even he took and stole on a particularly large scale and only eight years old, and justice and does not smell
    1. +1
      April 13 2018 10: 15
      In the USSR, they put it to the wall for such feats.
  19. +2
    April 13 2018 09: 46
    "I did not extort a bribe on the stairs ... It was in the toilet!"
    1. +2
      April 13 2018 10: 13
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      "I did not extort a bribe on the stairs ... It was in the toilet!"

      there and "soaked" the embezzler of unscrupulous wink
  20. +2
    April 13 2018 09: 51
    I can go a dozen straight away (I’m modestly)))) I can name our top officials for whom the prison has been crying for a long time !!!
    1. 0
      April 13 2018 10: 18
      Quote: Vladimir K.
      I can go a dozen straight away (I’m modestly)))) I can name our top officials for whom the prison has been crying for a long time !!!

      Did you study poorly at school? laughing Missed arithmetic classes? smile
      Let me remind you. Ten, eleven, twelve ........ seven thousand seven hundred seventy seven, well, etc. wink
      laughing
  21. +3
    April 13 2018 10: 14
    "I came to Sechin’s office because he promised to treat me with wine that I had never tasted."
    Okay so! During working hours, in a company car, it’s not cheap to go to the office of a state-owned company to drink wine! Well guys are not fucked up! Do you get millions of salaries for this?
  22. 0
    April 13 2018 10: 43
    Perhaps he will sit until parole, and then .... again in the ministerial chair?
    1. +1
      April 13 2018 14: 50
      smile by parole for a long time, at least 2/3 of the term, and even behavior matters, but amnesty lehhko!
  23. +3
    April 13 2018 11: 33
    Sechin flunked down another inconvenient minister. But Rosneft does not help much. She falls in capitalization steadily. In debt. Due to the inefficiency of managing the same Sechin.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    April 13 2018 11: 47
    Confiscation would be returned to such "individuals" and even as they are poor dependent on confiscation from all relatives during the time they occupied the position that they bought and acquired. That would be the case.
    1. 0
      April 13 2018 14: 51
      The execution would be returned, and not only that but also for the Winter Cherry.
  25. NKT
    0
    April 13 2018 13: 16
    He had to take in euros - a bag of "wine" would weigh a little more than 4 kg)
  26. 0
    April 13 2018 13: 22
    Gleb Zheglov said that a thief should sit on a bunk! And who is the corrupt person? He is a thief! Stealing from the country and the people! For such a thing you need to go to the wall!
  27. 0
    April 13 2018 15: 37
    From good wine, the head should not hurt ... but then got out with such a crap ...
    That's what it means to not share with anyone)