The UN Security Council rejected the projects of the Russian Federation on Syria. The guilty have already been appointed

The UN Security Council did not support the two Russian draft resolutions on the investigation of reports on the use of toxic substances in Syria, reports RIA News.

First, the Security Council rejected the document on the work of the new mechanism to investigate himatak in Syria. The proposed project was supported by six countries instead of nine necessary, including two permanent members of the Security Council - Russia and China, as well as Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Ethiopia and Equatorial Guinea. Two countries - Kuwait and Cote d'Ivoire abstained. The other seven members of the Council were against it.

Later, the Security Council rejected the project proposed by the Russian Permanent Mission in support of sending experts of the OPCW to the Syrian Duma. The document was supported by the Russian Federation, China, Ethiopia, Kazakhstan and Bolivia. Voted against the USA, Great Britain, France (permanent members of the Security Council) and Poland. Six countries abstained.

Permanent representative Vasily Nebenzia, commenting on the outcome of the vote, noted that it causes great concern.

Failure to adopt a resolution is, unfortunately, a litmus test that says a lot. And with us this causes big, big concerns. We proposed a completely innocent resolution, which, moreover, almost completely repeated yesterday’s Swedish,

said a Russian diplomat.

US Permanent Representative Nikki Haley explained exactly what she did not like in the second draft resolution:

Russia has included several proposals in its project, which are very problematic. She also (the Russian Federation) is trying to compromise an international investigation. The resolution puts Russia and the regime (Syrian President Bashar) Assad to the driver’s seat in order to prepare (work) the fact-finding mission (OPCW). We are asked to believe that the government itself, which says that everything that concerns the Duma is a fake, will work in good faith with the OPCW.

She added that the project had laid the “micromanagement of the work of the experts of the OPCW”, which indicated “where the investigators need to go”.

Recall that at the end of last week there were reports of the use of chemical weapons in the city of Duma. Western countries accused the Syrian authorities of what happened. Damascus and Moscow denied these accusations, saying that there was no incident at all in the Duma about the use of toxic substances, and all the reports about this were another fake.

Comments

[svp67]

Now the main thing is for the OPCW mission to arrive in Syria and work there before striking ... This is such a race, and our VKS and Navy have a role in it, those who MUST win time for this.

[Vard]

No one will go there ... The resolution was rejected ... They don’t need their face in their own city ... poked ...

[svp67]

Quote: Vard

No one will go there ... The resolution was rejected ...

But there is a decision of the OPCW itself ...

[saveall]

The OPCW itself will not go there without a resolution. That’s the trick of the United States and the Sixes ... To delay the adoption of the resolution as long as possible so that there is nothing to investigate. And then they will tell their idiots that it’s Russia that has blocked the adoption of the resolution all the time.

[alex-s]

The voting results are probably recorded.

[AID.S]

Quote: alex-s

The voting results are probably recorded.

Yeah, Meehan is recording ...

[Tatyana]

Quote: alex-s

The voting results are probably recorded.

The voting results in the documents themselves are unambiguously recorded, only the question is - in what form? Named by country or in total quantitative form?

It must be assumed that the secretaries of the meeting themselves will register the results of the vote openly by name and will not consciously by country. They will do it quietly stealthily, like switchmen, if diplomats do not follow this from the Russian Federation. Why should the secretaries - with such a (!) General mood of the participants of the meeting against Russia - record in the documents of the "arsonists" of the war, as its obvious provocateurs?

[210ox]

And!? What next?

Quote: alex-s

The voting results are probably recorded.

[igorbrsv]

In Western news, they will still say: Russia rejected. Everyone will think so

[saveall]

Quote: igorbrsv

In Western news, they will still say: Russia rejected. Everyone will think so

So, after all, it’s as if you can’t argue ... Russia will indeed block American, French, British and other six resolutions, and they are ours.

[cniza]

The United States will never allow this, or they will be covered there, but they will blame Russia.

[Sergey-svs]

Brief presentation by the Syrian representative at the UN in a free retelling:
Syrian - you are all nits and morons, and Russian resources are spent to help the people, and you are to destroy everything. An American - she’s left the reels altogether and says that the UN is fucking unnecessary. And if she says she wants to prove that this is nonsense and the UN, what an important body, let the Americans initiate the publication of the archives of the commission of chemists on Iraq, which they have hidden for 60 years. Let's take a look at what the commission found at Hussein and laugh.
And yet, Jews, dogs, they bombed us today, hell would they have decided if the Americans hadn’t covered them. And now everyone is sitting here and like shit in their mouth they typed on the fact of aggression. Vaughn, Demonstration and the UN turned on the fool and shrug their shoulders at whoever bombed there, although the Jews themselves all called up.
This whole story is the result of successful actions when we put bandyuk cancer.
You all lie, and the more you lie, the stupider.
You guys consider yourself very smart and use your lies to cover the destruction of other states. But you can’t even whistle coherently - an American hangs up noodles here, and her defense minister says in an interview that there is no evidence of Assad’s use of OM.
Back in the 13th year, we wrote at the UN that the Angloamers escalate the Wahhabis, like, say, let’s say, guys, we’ll hang everything on Assad. They use organic matter, tea is not completely idiotic.
And now: we have already agreed with everyone, we are taking all the bandits to the garden, and here - bam, chemistry and a meeting.
What the hell actually? Here the Jews climb and glory to Allah that the Russians convened a conference on the threat to peace earlier than you on gas.
We, along with the Russians and Kazakhs, hesitated to send letters to you on the fact that the Wahhabis had all kinds of rubbish about which they were talking at meetings in Astana, but they did not give a shit.
In general, you take a look - we all, like, were bombed, but not a single kosher Wahhabi was poisoned, only women and children. Isn't it strange?
And why the hell are you scaring us with a commission? Let’s, but what would it be like last time when we were reached only 4 months after application, and somewhere in Kukuyevo, where no one used anything!
All of you, Americans with hangers-on - morons are finished, we, together with the Russians, your ISIS for 3 months on x .. turned, instead of 30 years, as Obama bequeathed, and if you feel sorry for your bandits, let him take them to Europe, and we how soaked, and we will soak.
And finally, Russian experts conducted research on the ground and in hospitals and made sure that it was a vaudeville.
Thanks to everybody, you're free.

[Orionvit]

Quote: saveall

And then they will say to their idiots that it’s Russia that has blocked the adoption of the resolution all the time.

Why then? More than sure that the states did not have time to reject the resolution of Russia, then all of their "free and non-existent" press exploded with the headlines that it was Russia that blocked everything and did not allow the "free world" to find out the "truth". In the "free world", censorship and political control are such that the Soviet Union, together with Stalin, are not around. In the USSR, they did not say much, but at least they didn’t lie, and so brazenly.

[Andrey K]

Quote: Vard

... No one will go there ... The resolution was rejected ... They don’t need their face in their own city ... poked ...

The UN Secretary General has already spoken out on this subject - he demands that the OPCW provide full access to the place of the chemical attack in Syria.

[vorobey]

Quote: Andrey K

The UN Secretary General has already spoken out on this subject -

He spoke out before the resolution ...

[Andrey K]

Quote: vorobey

... He spoke out before the resolution ...

Sash
Here I missed something.

[donavi49]

A matter of authority. The UN did not authorize the OPCW to go there. Consequently, the OPCW findings are informative, but meaningless. They do not have a UN mandate to investigate.

[siberalt]

Americans need to be beaten out from Syria, then no white helmets will appear there.

[Same lech]

The non-adoption of the resolution is, unfortunately, a litmus test that says a lot.

To exclude the USA ... England ... France from the UN Security Council for abuse of the VETO right and in their place invite INDIA, VIETNAM, VENEZUELA and other countries affected by the bloody hands of the Anglo-Saxons.

[vorobey]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Exclude USA ... England ... France from UN Security Council for abuse of Veto right

But they demand the same with respect to Russia ...

[210ox]

It’s easier to cover this noddle in general ..

Quote: vorobey

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Exclude USA ... England ... France from UN Security Council for abuse of Veto right

But they demand the same with respect to Russia ...

[Mountain shooter]

However, there will be nothing. Why the United States was afraid of the indistinct threat of the DPRK, which either has a missile reaching America or not, but was blown away by dancing with aircraft carriers. But when they really "run into" a country that EXACTLY has everything to send striped ears to the Stone Age - they do not believe that all this will fly?

[helmi8]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

However, there will be nothing. Why the United States was afraid of the indistinct threat of the DPRK, which either has a missile reaching America or not, but was blown away by dancing with aircraft carriers. But when they really "run into" a country that EXACTLY has everything to send striped ears to the Stone Age - they do not believe that all this will fly?

I think the reason is that they consider Una unpredictable, capable of anything. But Russia is afraid to answer, understanding what the consequences may be. Therefore, there is only one way out - in the event of an attack on Syria, as Gerasimov promised, to sink one or two ships. The Yankees give up immediately. They will not go into a direct collision, also understanding the consequences.

[New Year day]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Why the United States was afraid of the indistinct threat of the DPRK, which either has a missile reaching America or not, but was blown away by dancing with aircraft carriers. But when they really "run into" a country that EXACTLY has everything to send striped ears to the Stone Age - they do not believe that all this will fly?

The Korean is really unpredictable, maybe he will shoot with the slogan "After us, at least the flood."
Russia is silent, even Ukraine has already arrested a second ship, but there is no answer.
Then the elite. There is no North Korean in the West, but ours is a wagon and a small cart. America comes from Brzezinski's postulate

[URAL72]

It could not be otherwise. After Trump’s statement, it was necessary to defiantly withdraw the military from vacations, declare combat, withdraw poplars and yars from their places of deployment, disperse nuclear weapons in parts, hang missiles under bombers, refuel them, disperse them, partly lift them into the air, armor ships and submarines with special ammunition, start de-preservation of some equipment, primarily air defense systems, aircraft, tanks. Expand at the expense of reservists to the wartime states several units in the western direction and the far east. I think our "partners" would be able to prove that Syria does not exist, this is fake ... And what is the practice for Russia, such exercises have not yet happened. But it seems they are needed. After such attacks on Russia, keeping nuclear weapons in warehouses, and bombers at two bases, is a crime.

[AID.S]

Quote: URAL72

It was necessary after the announcement of trump

maybe already ...

[seregatara1969]

Security Council does not want security in Syria

[Rey_ka]

Well, the world is rapidly heading towards destruction, and rightly so!

[DPN]

Krylov’s fable must be known and remembered. The strong is always GUILTY. If we don’t get scared and give the USA in the face in Syria then everything will be in order peace will come.

[Opera]

But in my opinion all is well! Well, or certainly there is no silver lining! What we have learned lately for sure (many knew this before, and the rest have seen it now) - there is no international law! Rather, it is, as it were, and it is sometimes said about him. So we all need to calm down and stop talking about world peace! We are not considered when we talk about international law. So what ?! We’ll shoot down missiles, both planes and ships will sink, bearing a direct threat to our citizens! War? So we will fight. It is necessary - it is so necessary! Seriously and without talking. Do we have another choice? Those who believe that there are individuals, individually or in small groups, can join the world order - a woman and her mare are easier! Everyone else focus and calmly do their job. The President recently said about the ability to retaliate and the subsequent world catastrophe - if Russia does not exist in this world, then why do we need such a world ?! Gold words! We do not need such a world.

[Ingvar0401]

I also believe that the OPCW’s mission will not reach — the Americans will strike with axes at the Duma and all ends in water

[prior]

In Russia, it seems that there is no one worthy to answer to the West except Nebenzi, and unfortunately the framework of diplomacy is holding him back.

[megadeth]

Our diplomats behave according to the old methods and laws of diplomacy: - decently, - in every possible way select words and formulations. Western pigs do not understand what is at stake, we must say take off in a language they understand ....

[Dead duck]

the project included “micro-management of the OPCW experts”, which indicated “where should investigators go”

it’s even scary to think about where they really should go

[iouris]

In my opinion, Nebenzya is not convincing: there are too many superfluous words.

[Orionvit]

We are invited to believe that the very government that says that everything related to the Duma, this fake, will work in good faith with the OPCW.

In a word, "we are against, because we simply do not like you." Great argument. It may come down for an offended child, but such a grind from the UN rostrum?

[bone1]

It seems that they have already reached world morality. Speaking in “childish” language: the US representative (C) runs to the UN - “I heard on the market yesterday that someone was poisoned (or drowned) in Syria (or in Bolivia) —you have to do something” - Russian representative (R ) - "let's figure it out," C- "let's figure it out, let's shoot," P- "no, we have to figure it out first," C- "well, to hell with your UN-we’ll shoot it."