Sarmat made US missile defense ineffective. 40 minimum

Vladimir Degtyar, general director of the Makeyev Center, stated that the United States in the coming 40 years will not be able to create a missile defense system capable of intercepting the Russian Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile.

Our current development makes modern US missile defense systems of little success, and the Sarmat missile system will remain effective in the context of deploying a missile defense system in the next 40 years. This means that Sarmat guarantees Russia the world in the coming decades.

- He said in an interview published in the corporate newspaper "Designer".

PC-28 "Sarmat" - Russian promising ground-based missile system with a heavy liquid intercontinental ballistic missile. Developed since 2000-ies by specialists of the V. P. Makeyev State Rocket Center JSC as a replacement for the Voyevoda P-36М2 complex. Mass is about 200 t, throw weight is about 10 t.

It is expected that the serial production of "Sarmat" will begin in 2020, in 2021, the first regiment with this missile should take up combat duty, reports TASS

Comments

[bogart047]

I hope this is not verified.

[Logall]

Putin’s speech, as well as subsequent statements by politicians, was aimed only at achieving one goal - to make Americans spend even more money on various developments! So that their already competent military budget deprived and bloodless ... Which, apparently, turned out well.

[ul_vitalii]

If only “Sarmat” would not have deserted there before time, he will say that it’s better there, it is necessary to monitor it.

[Evgeniy667b]

"Sarmat" is still in single copies, and by 2020 it is necessary to survive. Russia does not need to cut public defense orders, but to fulfill it in the requested volume. And it turns out, as under Peter 1-amusing, that is, ostentatious troops, in small numbers, the rest with pitchforks and clubs. About plans there is nothing to tryndet, PR specialists are bad. But when something real happens, then talk

[vovanpain]

Our current development makes modern US missile defense systems of little success, and the Sarmat missile system will remain effective in the context of deploying a missile defense system in the next 40 years. This means that Sarmat guarantees Russia the world in the coming decades.

Yes, of course it pleases but

It is expected that serial production of "Sarmat" will begin in 2020, in 2021 the first regiment with this missile should take up combat duty

But this is not so in today's realities, so for now we hope for

R-36M2 "Governor".

[Hanokem]

I will tell you a great US military secret. No one is going to create missile defense from Russian missiles (due to their huge number, this would be arch-expensive and not a fact that is doable). The purpose of the American missile defense is to protect against the ghoul countries of Iran and North Korea, which are unpredictable. And you do not understand why anger comes out and you drink Corvalol with every news of the development of the American missile defense.

[forester]

Quote: Hanokem

I will tell you a great US military secret. No one is going to create missile defense from Russian missiles (due to their huge number, this would be arch-expensive and not a fact that is doable). The purpose of the American missile defense is to protect against the ghoul countries of Iran and North Korea, which are unpredictable. And you do not understand why anger comes out and you drink Corvalol with every news of the development of the American missile defense.

You are an illiterate and stupid subject, better study the geography and do not lean out here

[Hanokem]

Logger, open your site and then you will decide who and what will be written on your site. In the meantime, continue to carry the forest, it’s better than writing any absurdities. And try at least a little look at the true situation, get out of your fictional world.

[forester]

The true state of things is this - you don’t know the geography so sit there in circumcision and do not blather - your country exists only thanks to my country and not to you the subject with reduced social responsibility to rant here

[Hunter 2]

For those who wrote the article, Learn the tenses of verbs! I didn’t do it, but I’ll do it (I really hope for it), so I’ll stand on combat duty - you can write I did it! With all due respect.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Hunter 2

Learn the tenses of verbs!

Aleksey, these verbs have also gored me: future tense and imperfect form!

[Hunter 2]

Alexander, good evening! Although judging by the news, he is not very kind!
We have a duck here, half of the news - News from the future! And the truth is already bored.

[d1975]

You are right, you sometimes read such a thing that it’s very embarrassing, why are admins here?

[zart_arn]

An optimistic statement after twenty years of slander and mockery of the skilled working class, etc.

[DenZ]

We hope the Krasnoyarsk residents and allies will not let you down. But nobody made fun of Makeevtsev. They also had enough work.

[97110]

Quote: zart_arn

after twenty years of slander and mockery of a skilled working class, etc.

Did something happen? The son of the owner apologized, promised not to call more slaves? Yeah, this event ...

[zart_arn]

Well, I’m shy of that, I would have expressed myself more intimately for a glass of tea in an intimate conversation, and then they would immediately be banned.

[wicked pinnochio]

the name is interesting Sarmatians so it seems nomads were called living in the territory of modern Russia and Ukraine.

[Thunderbolt]

in 2021, the first regiment with this missile should take up combat duty

How many missiles will there be in a regiment?

[zart_arn]

After all, the article clearly states “with a rocket”, which means with a rocket (one).

[voyaka uh]

They will be delivered to the Voivod mines. There are 74 mines.
Serviceable - at least half.

[fedor13]

For you to fix one additional?

[voyaka uh]

Thank. We have our own. Not so huge and powerful, of course.
But also - fly far

[Boa kaa]

Quote: voyaka uh

Thank. We have our own. Not so huge and powerful, of course.

Warrior, hello! Alexei, you either lie or give away to a state secret! Or have you already “dug up” your third Jericho?
As far as I know, the state of Israel and its IDF do not have mine PUs for the BR ... Or, as Golda Meyer told us, it continues: not to deny, but not confirm ...

[Ascetic]

Quote: voyaka uh

They will be delivered to the Voivod mines. There are 74 mines.

Now 46 are on the database. Sarmat will be a maximum of 58 no longer needed.
74 was ten years ago, in general, in the Union, if memory serves, more than 300 launchers were deployed as part of six taxiways. Now 2 rd and 46PU

[ivan0vitch]

The missile, already during the throw tests ahead of the US missile defense by 40 years. But what can she do when she is adopted? it’s even scary to think, at least 1000 years have gone ahead

[KCA]

Computer simulation is at its best when you saw the latest tests of nuclear and thermonuclear charges? But they are new designed and manufactured, and with ICBMs, there are tests of individual parts, for example, an engine that they test, receive characteristics and can judge the parameters of the whole product, especially Sarmat will not develop from scratch, for sure part of the product will be from "Voivode", because it is all developed in Russia and the documentation is stored in Russia, the question is in restoring production

[ivan0vitch]

maybe you have the characteristics of a missile defense system too? to be sure to simulate) and what kind of figure is this - 40 years? maybe the Americans will invent a gravitsap tomorrow, will they hit the rockets at the start and your 40 years will be reduced to the day after tomorrow? I consider such terms to be populist chants, moreover, with regard to a missile undelivered

[Bully]

Quote: Rossia

maybe you have the characteristics of a missile defense system too?

The team involved in the development of ICBMs, as a rule, also solves the opposite problem, therefore it is aware of the state of missile defense of its neighbors. The characteristics of a missile capable of intercepting Sartmat are known. Given the trends in the development of science and new materials, the specialist makes a forecast when the desired anti-missile appears. No populism, just calculation.

[ivan0vitch]

lived, were, say, in 1920, the Japanese in the city of Hiroshima. And they said, "taking into account the development trends of science and new materials, our experts make a forecast" that this bunker will withstand any bombs for 40 years! And after 25 years they flew by yourself you know what) So, somehow the calculations of specialists do not convince me. 40 years is too much. It is necessary for experts to lie more modestly)

[loginovich]

Quote: Logall

Putin’s speech, as well as subsequent statements by politicians, was aimed only at achieving one goal - to make Americans spend even more money on various developments! So that their already competent military budget deprived and bloodless ... Which, apparently, turned out well.

Has it really happened?

[_Jack_]

it remains to make them in sufficient quantities, if the existing 74 mines are already filled well

[gig090]

So, like one has already been put on duty? or blah blah again?
And the most important thing is that, as always, everything will be done soon, right now, and so for the last 4 years. You kind of wake up, your conflict with the USA can begin within 48 hours, and not in three years, not in 5 years. This is all you need now. Where are the promised armats, su-57, etc.? Why is everything not fulfilled as promised on time? where is the money, what do the specialists do? how much can a redoubt for a pot not be finished for several years, but did they make a nuclear engine? Something is wrong here.

[DenZ]

Quote: gig090

So, like one has already been put on duty?

Where did you read this nonsense? If the rocket only throws the test passes then what the hell are you on duty?

[gig090]

Quote: DenZ

Quote: gig090

So, like one has already been put on duty?

Where did you read this nonsense? If the rocket only throws the test passes then what the hell are you on duty?

GDP said this last in an interview with Kelly. He said even more, a nuclear-powered rocket is on duty.

[Anti-Corr.]

Quote: gig090

GDP said this last in an interview with Kelly. He said even more, the rocket I am on a nuclear engine on duty.

He said a lot of things.

[DenZ]

Quote: gig090

GDP said this last in an interview with Kelly. He said even more, a nuclear-powered rocket is on duty

Sarmat’s is not a nuclear engine, but an ordinary rocket engine. Putin spoke of a cruise missile.

[Old26]

Quote: Thunderbolt

in 2021, the first regiment with this missile should take up combat duty

How many missiles will there be in a regiment?

Previous missiles in the division had regiments with 6 missiles and one regiment with 10 missiles. In service in 2021 put the starting minimum. This is a mine command post and 2 missiles.

.

Quote: Rossia

The missile, already during the throw tests ahead of the US missile defense by 40 years. But what can she do when she is adopted? it’s even scary to think, at least 1000 years have gone ahead

Precisely ahead. This is a new word in science and technology when, having crashed 10-20 km from the launch, the missile is already 40 years ahead of the American missile defense. And frankly speaking, to give such an interview for my own circulation - there was a somewhat better opinion about Degtyar. The interview is called "for the public’s fun"

[DenZ]

Quote: Old26

was about Degtyar a little better opinion. the interview is called "for the amusement of the public"

As far as I know, the tar man already wrote to himself on the order. And generally not from modest he.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

The United States is not deploying a missile defense system around Russia, but a system of massive tactical missile strikes, the missile defense system uses MK 41 launchers, from which both Standard missiles and Tomahawks with a nuclear warhead can be launched ...

We not only need to improve the ICBM system, but also keep ready the air defense systems and tactical systems in order to pinch all the US missile defense systems around Russia ...

[Whisper]

How many of these Sarmatians are on duty? Donald Cook, as I understand it, is already standing under Hmeimim.

[taiga2018]

all this is a super-duper weapon only for deterrence, while the United States effectively hits us with economic weapons and with the current approaches to the economic development of Russia, our economy is ineffective for at least another 40 years ...

[wow]

Don `t cry ! What did you see around you with the stigma "Made in USA"!? Nothing. Our “partners” even made souvenirs on Indian reservations made in China!

[taiga2018]

Quote: yo-mine

Don `t cry !

Yes, what have the whining to do with it, this dualism of our authorities just gets already, on the one hand they shout that they will not bend us, and on the other hand they continue to call the West partners, and this after all that these "partners" have already spoiled us, but it would be worth to break off diplomatic relations with at least Great Britain, but what can you do, as the offspring of our officials are studying there, they have palaces and villas ...

[wow]

The deadly "toy". And it pleases !

[Chichikov]

So far, “Sarmat” has not done anything, but until 2020 and ... still need to survive, and possibly survive!

[Totah155]

Has he already learned to fly?
And then only throwing pictures show

If not, how did he “do” (the past tense)?

[Old26]

Quote: KCA

Computer simulation is at its best when you saw the latest tests of nuclear and thermonuclear charges? But they are new designed and manufactured, and with ICBMs, there are tests of individual parts, for example, an engine that they test, receive characteristics and can judge the parameters of the whole product, especially Sarmat will not develop from scratch, for sure part of the product will be from "Voivode", because it is all developed in Russia and the documentation is stored in Russia, the question is in restoring production

We have not really seen the tests of new thermonuclear charges in the last quarter century. But all the charges that are being created now have about the same construct as the pre-existing ones. If their energy release does not differ by orders of magnitude, computer simulation can also be used. If something, which did not exist at all, in spite of computer simulation, the test puts an end to it. Therefore, when they say, for example, that “Status-6” will have a 100-megaton charge, it does not cause anything but laughter.

Yes, on the basis of engines, many conclusions can be drawn, as well as on the basis of starting and casting weight. Here are just the starting and throwing weights voiced, plus the engine, plus the statement that the rocket has a short AUT - go to the "tear", do not match

"Sarmat" is what is being developed from scratch. Makeev and Chelomeevskaya firm. There is no part of the product from the Voivode, it even has dimensions different from Sarmat. The “Voivode” was all developed IN UKRAINE. In KB "SOUTH" and the only thing that could be developed in Russia (more precisely in the USSR) - marching engines and physical packages of warheads. The control system is Kharkov, the aiming system was created at the Kiev Arsenal plant ...
And the question is not RESTORE production, and in CREATIONS production FROM SCRATCH

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

The United States is not deploying a missile defense system around Russia, but a system of massive tactical missile strikes, the missile defense system uses MK 41 launchers, from which both Standard missiles and Tomahawks with a nuclear warhead can be launched ...

We not only need to improve the ICBM system, but also keep ready the air defense systems and tactical systems in order to pinch all the US missile defense systems around Russia ...

To run "Tomahawks" with their nuclear part, nuclear parts must be. Most of them have been disposed of, and the rest will go to new sea and air cruise missiles ... Americans will be able to produce new charges from around 2030.
And where will these “Tomahawks” fly from existing bases?
1. From Deveselu (Romania) - approximately to Voronezh. They will cut a couple of hours
2. From Poland through the Baltic states - almost to Leningrad
3. From Poland through Belarus - almost to Moscow (the question is, Old Man will sit and wonder where the missiles are going, to Minsk or Moscow, or bring them to hell
4. From the southern base in Japan - approximately to Vladivostok, maybe a little further. Subsonic target over the sea - it’s better not to come up with targets. If from the Northern base - it will reach exactly Birobidzhan, maybe even to Blagoveshchensk. Will everyone stand and look at their passage?

[Old26]

Quote: voyaka uh

They will be delivered to the Voivod mines. There are 74 mines.

Alexei. Until recently (approximately until 2014) there were 52 such missiles. Over the past few years - 46. Plus, several non-deployed mines. Where does the figure 74 come from, if all of them were made about 85-88 and some were based in Kazakhstan.

Quote: _Jack_

it remains to make them in sufficient quantities, if the existing 74 mines are already filled well

The figure has already been voiced approximately - about 40. It is possible that they will be deployed as much as in recent years there was a "Governor" - 46

Quote: gig090

How about one already put on duty? or blah blah again?

On duty there are now 0,0000 (0) Sarmatians. There is not even one missile for flight tests, but they are already putting it on the database ...

Quote: gig090

You kind of wake up, your conflict with the USA can begin within 48 hours, and not in three years, not in 5 years. This is all you need now.

And now Russian strategic nuclear forces are not enough to "vitrify" the surface of America ???

Quote: gig090

GDP said this last in an interview with Kelly. He said even more, a nuclear-powered rocket is on duty.

After one flight test in December last year, when it was unclear even how many flew, a hundred kilometers or more ... But they were already on duty .... Listen less to what our media broadcast to you ...

Quote: DenZ

As far as I know, the tar man already wrote to himself on the order. And generally not from modest he.

I don’t know about this, Denis, but to give such an interview in your own corporate newspaper is bad manners. Okay, I’d give it to some Kommersant, but to my ...

Quote: yo-mine

The deadly "toy". And it pleases !

So far, this is just a mock test. Not even a prototype rocket ...

Quote: Totah155

Has he already learned to fly?
And then only throwing pictures show

If not, how did he “do” (the past tense)?

And it is necessary to ask the authors of the title to the note. There is still at least one proskovy test closer to the middle of the year. If everything goes well at the end of the year, flight tests will begin

[Zomanus]

Only now we have no “Sarmat”, do not forget it.
Well, 2021 will come up with a lot more.

[iouris]

And if our forty years end in fifteen? Whereas in a joke: the grandmother was shattered, and the galoshes of the factory "Red Triangle" as new.

[Old26]

Quote: Ascetic

Now 46 are on the database.

Stanislav!
• at 1.07. In 2017, according to figures from the data exchange, Russia had 523 deployed carriers and 1765 warheads
• on 1.10. In 2017, according to figures from the data exchange, Russia had 501 deployed carriers and 1561 warheads
That is, minus 22 carriers and minus 204 warheads. The most interesting figure is 20 and 200? Doesn’t resemble anything?

[u1977020556]

This is very good for 40 years. Dear Government of the Russian Federation, come up with something else, just don’t advertise, but try it out - let it tremble and count the minutes.

[Old26]

Quote: u1977020556

This is very good for 40 years. Dear Government of the Russian Federation, come up with something else, just don’t advertise, but try it out - let it tremble and count the minutes.

And if you do not advertise, then how will they know, tremble and count the seconds?
The Russian government NOTHING can’t come up with. Raise the prices - it will come up, To give the multi-billion dollar credits to the side, and then forgive, since the countries are poor and can not give up - it will come up. To give their citizens a credit amnesty - but not in life
And 40 years is for a red phrase, so that people would shawl and rejoice

[Old26]

Quote: Hanokem

I will tell you a great US military secret. No one is going to create missile defense from Russian missiles (due to their huge number, this would be arch-expensive and not a fact that is doable). The purpose of the American missile defense is to protect against the ghoul countries of Iran and North Korea, which are unpredictable. And you do not understand why anger comes out and you drink Corvalol with every news of the development of the American missile defense.

You should not have written it. They’ll trample you now, they will throw you with slippers and beaten up with patriots by candelabra. They all the facts, TTX and so on - do not care. Once they said at the top that missile defense against Russia is the way it is. They said that there is already in service something that has passed only throwing tests - they believe this as the ultimate truth.
All that does not coincide with their view is a blatant lie. And if the facts speak otherwise, the worse for the facts.