Military Review

Sarmat made US missile defense ineffective. 40 minimum

55
Vladimir Degtyar, general director of the Makeyev Center, stated that the United States in the coming 40 years will not be able to create a missile defense system capable of intercepting the Russian Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile.


Sarmat made US missile defense ineffective. 40 minimum


Our current development makes modern US missile defense systems of little success, and the Sarmat missile system will remain effective in the context of deploying a missile defense system in the next 40 years. This means that Sarmat guarantees Russia the world in the coming decades.
- He said in an interview published in the corporate newspaper "Designer".

PC-28 "Sarmat" - Russian promising ground-based missile system with a heavy liquid intercontinental ballistic missile. Developed since 2000-ies by specialists of the V. P. Makeyev State Rocket Center JSC as a replacement for the Voyevoda P-36М2 complex. Mass is about 200 t, throw weight is about 10 t.

It is expected that the serial production of "Sarmat" will begin in 2020, in 2021, the first regiment with this missile should take up combat duty, reports TASS
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. bogart047
    bogart047 April 10 2018 17: 54
    +3
    I hope this is not verified.
    1. Logall
      Logall April 10 2018 17: 56
      +5
      Putin’s speech, as well as subsequent statements by politicians, was aimed only at achieving one goal - to make Americans spend even more money on various developments! So that their already competent military budget deprived and bloodless ... Which, apparently, turned out well.
      1. ul_vitalii
        ul_vitalii April 10 2018 18: 13
        +8
        If only “Sarmat” would not have deserted there before time, he will say that it’s better there, it is necessary to monitor it. smile
      2. Evgeniy667b
        Evgeniy667b April 11 2018 04: 12
        0
        "Sarmat" is still in single copies, and by 2020 it is necessary to survive. Russia does not need to cut public defense orders, but to fulfill it in the requested volume. And it turns out, as under Peter 1-amusing, that is, ostentatious troops, in small numbers, the rest with pitchforks and clubs. About plans there is nothing to tryndet, PR specialists are bad. But when something real happens, then talk
    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain April 10 2018 18: 13
      +6
      Our current development makes modern US missile defense systems of little success, and the Sarmat missile system will remain effective in the context of deploying a missile defense system in the next 40 years. This means that Sarmat guarantees Russia the world in the coming decades.

      Yes, of course it pleases but
      It is expected that serial production of "Sarmat" will begin in 2020, in 2021 the first regiment with this missile should take up combat duty

      But this is not so in today's realities, so for now we hope for
      R-36M2 "Governor".
    3. Hanokem
      Hanokem April 11 2018 08: 19
      0
      I will tell you a great US military secret. No one is going to create missile defense from Russian missiles (due to their huge number, this would be arch-expensive and not a fact that is doable). The purpose of the American missile defense is to protect against the ghoul countries of Iran and North Korea, which are unpredictable. And you do not understand why anger comes out and you drink Corvalol with every news of the development of the American missile defense.
      1. forester
        forester April 11 2018 09: 20
        +1
        Quote: Hanokem
        I will tell you a great US military secret. No one is going to create missile defense from Russian missiles (due to their huge number, this would be arch-expensive and not a fact that is doable). The purpose of the American missile defense is to protect against the ghoul countries of Iran and North Korea, which are unpredictable. And you do not understand why anger comes out and you drink Corvalol with every news of the development of the American missile defense.

        You are an illiterate and stupid subject, better study the geography and do not lean out here
        1. Hanokem
          Hanokem April 11 2018 10: 48
          0
          Logger, open your site and then you will decide who and what will be written on your site. In the meantime, continue to carry the forest, it’s better than writing any absurdities. And try at least a little look at the true situation, get out of your fictional world.
          1. forester
            forester April 11 2018 12: 24
            +1
            The true state of things is this - you don’t know the geography so sit there in circumcision and do not blather - your country exists only thanks to my country and not to you the subject with reduced social responsibility to rant here
  2. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 April 10 2018 17: 57
    +11
    For those who wrote the article, Learn the tenses of verbs! I didn’t do it, but I’ll do it (I really hope for it), so I’ll stand on combat duty - you can write I did it! With all due respect. yes
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 10 2018 18: 50
      +5
      Quote: Hunter 2
      Learn the tenses of verbs!

      Aleksey, these verbs have also gored me: future tense and imperfect form! laughing
      1. Hunter 2
        Hunter 2 April 10 2018 18: 57
        +6
        Alexander, good evening! Although judging by the news, he is not very kind!
        We have a duck here, half of the news - News from the future! And the truth is already bored. hi
    2. d1975
      d1975 April 10 2018 22: 52
      +2
      You are right, you sometimes read such a thing that it’s very embarrassing, why are admins here? laughing
  3. zart_arn
    zart_arn April 10 2018 17: 58
    +3
    An optimistic statement after twenty years of slander and mockery of the skilled working class, etc.
    1. DenZ
      DenZ April 10 2018 19: 00
      0
      We hope the Krasnoyarsk residents and allies will not let you down. But nobody made fun of Makeevtsev. They also had enough work.
    2. 97110
      97110 April 10 2018 19: 06
      +2
      Quote: zart_arn
      after twenty years of slander and mockery of a skilled working class, etc.

      Did something happen? The son of the owner apologized, promised not to call more slaves? Yeah, this event ...
      1. zart_arn
        zart_arn April 10 2018 22: 37
        +1
        Well, I’m shy of that, I would have expressed myself more intimately for a glass of tea in an intimate conversation, and then they would immediately be banned. hi
  4. wicked pinnochio
    wicked pinnochio April 10 2018 18: 01
    +3
    the name is interesting Sarmatians so it seems nomads were called living in the territory of modern Russia and Ukraine.
  5. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt April 10 2018 18: 02
    0
    in 2021, the first regiment with this missile should take up combat duty
    How many missiles will there be in a regiment?
    1. zart_arn
      zart_arn April 10 2018 18: 06
      +3
      After all, the article clearly states “with a rocket”, which means with a rocket (one). laughing
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh April 10 2018 18: 12
      0
      They will be delivered to the Voivod mines. There are 74 mines.
      Serviceable - at least half.
      1. fedor13
        fedor13 April 10 2018 18: 23
        +4
        For you to fix one additional? winked
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh April 10 2018 18: 26
          +1
          Thank. We have our own. Not so huge and powerful, of course.
          But also - fly far
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa April 10 2018 18: 56
            +5
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Thank. We have our own. Not so huge and powerful, of course.

            Warrior, hello! Alexei, you either lie or give away to a state secret! bully Or have you already “dug up” your third Jericho?
            As far as I know, the state of Israel and its IDF do not have mine PUs for the BR ... Or, as Golda Meyer told us, it continues: not to deny, but not confirm ... laughing
      2. Ascetic
        Ascetic April 10 2018 21: 54
        +4
        Quote: voyaka uh
        They will be delivered to the Voivod mines. There are 74 mines.

        Now 46 are on the database. Sarmat will be a maximum of 58 no longer needed.
        74 was ten years ago, in general, in the Union, if memory serves, more than 300 launchers were deployed as part of six taxiways. Now 2 rd and 46PU
  6. ivan0vitch
    ivan0vitch April 10 2018 18: 08
    +7
    The missile, already during the throw tests ahead of the US missile defense by 40 years. But what can she do when she is adopted? it’s even scary to think, at least 1000 years have gone ahead
    1. KCA
      KCA April 10 2018 18: 26
      +1
      Computer simulation is at its best when you saw the latest tests of nuclear and thermonuclear charges? But they are new designed and manufactured, and with ICBMs, there are tests of individual parts, for example, an engine that they test, receive characteristics and can judge the parameters of the whole product, especially Sarmat will not develop from scratch, for sure part of the product will be from "Voivode", because it is all developed in Russia and the documentation is stored in Russia, the question is in restoring production
      1. ivan0vitch
        ivan0vitch April 10 2018 18: 38
        +7
        maybe you have the characteristics of a missile defense system too? to be sure to simulate) and what kind of figure is this - 40 years? maybe the Americans will invent a gravitsap tomorrow, will they hit the rockets at the start and your 40 years will be reduced to the day after tomorrow? I consider such terms to be populist chants, moreover, with regard to a missile undelivered
        1. Bully
          Bully April 10 2018 20: 19
          +2
          Quote: Rossia
          maybe you have the characteristics of a missile defense system too?

          The team involved in the development of ICBMs, as a rule, also solves the opposite problem, therefore it is aware of the state of missile defense of its neighbors. The characteristics of a missile capable of intercepting Sartmat are known. Given the trends in the development of science and new materials, the specialist makes a forecast when the desired anti-missile appears. No populism, just calculation.
          1. ivan0vitch
            ivan0vitch April 10 2018 21: 28
            +2
            lived, were, say, in 1920, the Japanese in the city of Hiroshima. And they said, "taking into account the development trends of science and new materials, our experts make a forecast" that this bunker will withstand any bombs for 40 years! And after 25 years they flew by yourself you know what) So, somehow the calculations of specialists do not convince me. 40 years is too much. It is necessary for experts to lie more modestly)
  7. loginovich
    loginovich April 10 2018 18: 11
    +1
    Quote: Logall
    Putin’s speech, as well as subsequent statements by politicians, was aimed only at achieving one goal - to make Americans spend even more money on various developments! So that their already competent military budget deprived and bloodless ... Which, apparently, turned out well.

    Has it really happened?
  8. _Jack_
    _Jack_ April 10 2018 18: 17
    0
    it remains to make them in sufficient quantities, if the existing 74 mines are already filled well
  9. gig090
    gig090 April 10 2018 18: 17
    +4
    So, like one has already been put on duty? or blah blah again?
    And the most important thing is that, as always, everything will be done soon, right now, and so for the last 4 years. You kind of wake up, your conflict with the USA can begin within 48 hours, and not in three years, not in 5 years. This is all you need now. Where are the promised armats, su-57, etc.? Why is everything not fulfilled as promised on time? where is the money, what do the specialists do? how much can a redoubt for a pot not be finished for several years, but did they make a nuclear engine? Something is wrong here.
    1. DenZ
      DenZ April 10 2018 19: 04
      +4
      Quote: gig090
      So, like one has already been put on duty?

      Where did you read this nonsense? If the rocket only throws the test passes then what the hell are you on duty?
      1. gig090
        gig090 April 10 2018 19: 24
        0
        Quote: DenZ
        Quote: gig090
        So, like one has already been put on duty?

        Where did you read this nonsense? If the rocket only throws the test passes then what the hell are you on duty?

        GDP said this last in an interview with Kelly. He said even more, a nuclear-powered rocket is on duty.
        1. Anti-Corr.
          Anti-Corr. April 10 2018 19: 28
          +2
          Quote: gig090
          GDP said this last in an interview with Kelly. He said even more, the rocket I am on a nuclear engine on duty.

          He said a lot of things.
        2. DenZ
          DenZ April 10 2018 23: 04
          0
          Quote: gig090
          GDP said this last in an interview with Kelly. He said even more, a nuclear-powered rocket is on duty

          Sarmat’s is not a nuclear engine, but an ordinary rocket engine. Putin spoke of a cruise missile.
  10. Old26
    Old26 April 10 2018 18: 18
    +2
    Quote: Thunderbolt
    in 2021, the first regiment with this missile should take up combat duty
    How many missiles will there be in a regiment?

    Previous missiles in the division had regiments with 6 missiles and one regiment with 10 missiles. In service in 2021 put the starting minimum. This is a mine command post and 2 missiles.

    .
    Quote: Rossia
    The missile, already during the throw tests ahead of the US missile defense by 40 years. But what can she do when she is adopted? it’s even scary to think, at least 1000 years have gone ahead

    Precisely ahead. This is a new word in science and technology when, having crashed 10-20 km from the launch, the missile is already 40 years ahead of the American missile defense. And frankly speaking, to give such an interview for my own circulation - there was a somewhat better opinion about Degtyar. The interview is called "for the public’s fun"
    1. DenZ
      DenZ April 10 2018 19: 06
      0
      Quote: Old26
      was about Degtyar a little better opinion. the interview is called "for the amusement of the public"

      As far as I know, the tar man already wrote to himself on the order. And generally not from modest he.
  11. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan April 10 2018 18: 21
    +3
    The United States is not deploying a missile defense system around Russia, but a system of massive tactical missile strikes, the missile defense system uses MK 41 launchers, from which both Standard missiles and Tomahawks with a nuclear warhead can be launched ...

    We not only need to improve the ICBM system, but also keep ready the air defense systems and tactical systems in order to pinch all the US missile defense systems around Russia ...
  12. Whisper
    Whisper April 10 2018 18: 23
    +1
    How many of these Sarmatians are on duty? Donald Cook, as I understand it, is already standing under Hmeimim.
  13. taiga2018
    taiga2018 April 10 2018 18: 32
    +4
    all this is a super-duper weapon only for deterrence, while the United States effectively hits us with economic weapons and with the current approaches to the economic development of Russia, our economy is ineffective for at least another 40 years ...
    1. wow
      wow April 10 2018 18: 48
      +1
      Don `t cry ! What did you see around you with the stigma "Made in USA"!? Nothing. Our “partners” even made souvenirs on Indian reservations made in China!
      1. taiga2018
        taiga2018 April 10 2018 18: 56
        +2
        Quote: yo-mine
        Don `t cry !

        Yes, what have the whining to do with it, this dualism of our authorities just gets already, on the one hand they shout that they will not bend us, and on the other hand they continue to call the West partners, and this after all that these "partners" have already spoiled us, but it would be worth to break off diplomatic relations with at least Great Britain, but what can you do, as the offspring of our officials are studying there, they have palaces and villas ...
  14. wow
    wow April 10 2018 18: 44
    0
    The deadly "toy". And it pleases !
  15. Chichikov
    Chichikov April 10 2018 18: 46
    +3
    So far, “Sarmat” has not done anything, but until 2020 and ... still need to survive, and possibly survive!
  16. Totah155
    Totah155 April 10 2018 19: 05
    +1
    Has he already learned to fly?
    And then only throwing pictures show

    If not, how did he “do” (the past tense)?
  17. Old26
    Old26 April 10 2018 19: 27
    +4
    Quote: KCA
    Computer simulation is at its best when you saw the latest tests of nuclear and thermonuclear charges? But they are new designed and manufactured, and with ICBMs, there are tests of individual parts, for example, an engine that they test, receive characteristics and can judge the parameters of the whole product, especially Sarmat will not develop from scratch, for sure part of the product will be from "Voivode", because it is all developed in Russia and the documentation is stored in Russia, the question is in restoring production

    We have not really seen the tests of new thermonuclear charges in the last quarter century. But all the charges that are being created now have about the same construct as the pre-existing ones. If their energy release does not differ by orders of magnitude, computer simulation can also be used. If something, which did not exist at all, in spite of computer simulation, the test puts an end to it. Therefore, when they say, for example, that “Status-6” will have a 100-megaton charge, it does not cause anything but laughter.

    Yes, on the basis of engines, many conclusions can be drawn, as well as on the basis of starting and casting weight. Here are just the starting and throwing weights voiced, plus the engine, plus the statement that the rocket has a short AUT - go to the "tear", do not match

    "Sarmat" is what is being developed from scratch. Makeev and Chelomeevskaya firm. There is no part of the product from the Voivode, it even has dimensions different from Sarmat. The “Voivode” was all developed IN UKRAINE. In KB "SOUTH" and the only thing that could be developed in Russia (more precisely in the USSR) - marching engines and physical packages of warheads. The control system is Kharkov, the aiming system was created at the Kiev Arsenal plant ...
    And the question is not RESTORE production, and in CREATIONS production FROM SCRATCH

    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    The United States is not deploying a missile defense system around Russia, but a system of massive tactical missile strikes, the missile defense system uses MK 41 launchers, from which both Standard missiles and Tomahawks with a nuclear warhead can be launched ...

    We not only need to improve the ICBM system, but also keep ready the air defense systems and tactical systems in order to pinch all the US missile defense systems around Russia ...

    To run "Tomahawks" with their nuclear part, nuclear parts must be. Most of them have been disposed of, and the rest will go to new sea and air cruise missiles ... Americans will be able to produce new charges from around 2030.
    And where will these “Tomahawks” fly from existing bases?
    1. From Deveselu (Romania) - approximately to Voronezh. They will cut a couple of hours
    2. From Poland through the Baltic states - almost to Leningrad
    3. From Poland through Belarus - almost to Moscow (the question is, Old Man will sit and wonder where the missiles are going, to Minsk or Moscow, or bring them to hell
    4. From the southern base in Japan - approximately to Vladivostok, maybe a little further. Subsonic target over the sea - it’s better not to come up with targets. If from the Northern base - it will reach exactly Birobidzhan, maybe even to Blagoveshchensk. Will everyone stand and look at their passage?
  18. Old26
    Old26 April 10 2018 19: 49
    +2
    Quote: voyaka uh
    They will be delivered to the Voivod mines. There are 74 mines.

    Alexei. Until recently (approximately until 2014) there were 52 such missiles. Over the past few years - 46. Plus, several non-deployed mines. Where does the figure 74 come from, if all of them were made about 85-88 and some were based in Kazakhstan.

    Quote: _Jack_
    it remains to make them in sufficient quantities, if the existing 74 mines are already filled well

    The figure has already been voiced approximately - about 40. It is possible that they will be deployed as much as in recent years there was a "Governor" - 46

    Quote: gig090
    How about one already put on duty? or blah blah again?

    On duty there are now 0,0000 (0) Sarmatians. There is not even one missile for flight tests, but they are already putting it on the database ...

    Quote: gig090
    You kind of wake up, your conflict with the USA can begin within 48 hours, and not in three years, not in 5 years. This is all you need now.

    And now Russian strategic nuclear forces are not enough to "vitrify" the surface of America ???

    Quote: gig090
    GDP said this last in an interview with Kelly. He said even more, a nuclear-powered rocket is on duty.

    After one flight test in December last year, when it was unclear even how many flew, a hundred kilometers or more ... But they were already on duty .... Listen less to what our media broadcast to you ...

    Quote: DenZ
    As far as I know, the tar man already wrote to himself on the order. And generally not from modest he.

    I don’t know about this, Denis, but to give such an interview in your own corporate newspaper is bad manners. Okay, I’d give it to some Kommersant, but to my ...

    Quote: yo-mine
    The deadly "toy". And it pleases !

    So far, this is just a mock test. Not even a prototype rocket ...

    Quote: Totah155
    Has he already learned to fly?
    And then only throwing pictures show

    If not, how did he “do” (the past tense)?

    And it is necessary to ask the authors of the title to the note. There is still at least one proskovy test closer to the middle of the year. If everything goes well at the end of the year, flight tests will begin
  19. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 10 2018 20: 04
    0
    Only now we have no “Sarmat”, do not forget it.
    Well, 2021 will come up with a lot more.
  20. iouris
    iouris April 10 2018 20: 34
    0
    And if our forty years end in fifteen? Whereas in a joke: the grandmother was shattered, and the galoshes of the factory "Red Triangle" as new.
  21. Old26
    Old26 April 10 2018 22: 11
    0
    Quote: Ascetic
    Now 46 are on the database.

    Stanislav!
    • at 1.07. In 2017, according to figures from the data exchange, Russia had 523 deployed carriers and 1765 warheads
    • on 1.10. In 2017, according to figures from the data exchange, Russia had 501 deployed carriers and 1561 warheads
    That is, minus 22 carriers and minus 204 warheads. The most interesting figure is 20 and 200? Doesn’t resemble anything?
  22. u1977020556
    u1977020556 April 10 2018 22: 29
    +1
    This is very good for 40 years. Dear Government of the Russian Federation, come up with something else, just don’t advertise, but try it out - let it tremble and count the minutes.
  23. Old26
    Old26 April 10 2018 22: 41
    +2
    Quote: u1977020556
    This is very good for 40 years. Dear Government of the Russian Federation, come up with something else, just don’t advertise, but try it out - let it tremble and count the minutes.

    And if you do not advertise, then how will they know, tremble and count the seconds?
    The Russian government NOTHING can’t come up with. Raise the prices - it will come up, To give the multi-billion dollar credits to the side, and then forgive, since the countries are poor and can not give up - it will come up. To give their citizens a credit amnesty - but not in life
    And 40 years is for a red phrase, so that people would shawl and rejoice
  24. Old26
    Old26 April 11 2018 08: 32
    0
    Quote: Hanokem
    I will tell you a great US military secret. No one is going to create missile defense from Russian missiles (due to their huge number, this would be arch-expensive and not a fact that is doable). The purpose of the American missile defense is to protect against the ghoul countries of Iran and North Korea, which are unpredictable. And you do not understand why anger comes out and you drink Corvalol with every news of the development of the American missile defense.

    You should not have written it. They’ll trample you now, they will throw you with slippers and beaten up with patriots by candelabra. They all the facts, TTX and so on - do not care. Once they said at the top that missile defense against Russia is the way it is. They said that there is already in service something that has passed only throwing tests - they believe this as the ultimate truth.
    All that does not coincide with their view is a blatant lie. And if the facts speak otherwise, the worse for the facts.