Almaz-Antey will present air defense in India

Concern VKO "Almaz-Antey" will present at the international exhibition "Defexpo India - 2018" models of air defense systems and complexes, including C-400, reports Interfax-AVN message of the press service of the company.

Our participation in this event is aimed at strengthening the group’s image as a reliable supplier of exclusive defense products, as well as expanding the range of potential customers among the countries of the southeast region,

quoted by the press service of the Deputy Director General for Foreign Economic Affairs Vyacheslav Dzirkaln.

“During the exhibition, the concern’s representatives are planning to hold a series of meetings and negotiations with government and business representatives of India and other countries participating in the exhibition, with potential customers for military and civilian products, including spare parts, inspection services, maintenance, repair, modernization and disposal of air defense systems, as well as training the customer’s specialists in carrying out such works, ”added the concern.

It is reported that the exhibition will feature “ground-based and sea-based anti-aircraft missile systems and systems (ZRS / ZRK), including C-400 Triumph, C-300BM Antey-2500”, “Tor-M2E”, “Tor-M2K” "," Tor-M2KM "," Buk-M2E "," Osa-AKM1 "," Rif-M "and" Shtil-1 "and ZPRK" Tunguska-M1 "".

Also at the stand of the enterprise will be exhibited missiles from the Club-S and Club-N integrated rocket systems and airspace radar stations.

Comments

[sergey32]

It was necessary to apply From 400 to F15 tonight, as Gerasimov promised. Then no advertising and exhibitions would be needed.

[vorobey]

Quote: sergey32

It was necessary to apply C 400 to F15 tonight, as Gerasimov promised

firstly they beat Iranians ... secondly, where did you have to attack F15 in the sky of Lebanon?

[gig334]

Quote: vorobey

Quote: sergey32

It was necessary to apply C 400 to F15 tonight, as Gerasimov promised

firstly they beat Iranians ... secondly, where did you have to attack F15 in the sky of Lebanon?

No, hit the airfields from which Israeli planes took off. In addition to the Iranians, there were Syrians and our advisers.

[sergey32]

And what does Lebanon have and what to object to?

[Borik]

Gerasimov promised to shoot down American missiles. And then the Jews were noted.

[vorobey]

Quote: Borik

Gerasimov promised to shoot down American missiles. And then the Jews were noted.

for about a month, the Jews were picking up the keys to overcoming the air defense system .. and they couldn’t show the result ... five shot down from eight launched .. I think this is not bad for the Arabs ..

the truth, as the great dictator grandfather Lenin said, to learn to study and study again ... This is me Arabs ..

and the Hebrews ... well, you fucking Papuans ... you have most of ours. who studied with us. who one cracker for two in the trenches procrastinated. You know us. we know you .. well, what kind of banana do you climb on luli like flies for sweets ... you know that it won’t be sweet ... and inappropriately reproach how you like, like our allies are not suitable ... we are even you look at your crazy allies .. will be thrown ..

[keeper03]

Americans take advantage of our predictability! This is our misfortune!
And you need this: "He said one thing - and lupanuli where they did not wait!" And then they will be afraid of us, like a mad dog!

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: sergey32

... as Gerasimov promised ...

Gerasimov, in fact, promised like this:

Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov said that in the event of a threat to life, Russian servicemen will take retaliatory measures

More on TASS:
http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/5024872

What you inattentively read is not the problem of the Russian Federation and Gerasimov personally.

[sergey32]

Yeah, an ax flies to the air base, where our advisers are. His trajectory is by no means ballistic in order to calculate in advance the place of impact. And our supposedly already know that the Iranians will be attacked in the western part of the air base, and nothing threatens our advisers. Or warned?

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: sergey32

our advisers are

Are they definitely there?

[gig334]

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: sergey32

... as Gerasimov promised ...

Gerasimov, in fact, promised like this:

Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov said that in the event of a threat to life, Russian servicemen will take retaliatory measures

More on TASS:
http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/5024872

What you inattentively read is not the problem of the Russian Federation and Gerasimov personally.

As far as I remember, it was about missiles and their carriers, whoever fired them, that they would be destroyed if there was a threat to the Russian military. And as I understood from today's statement by the Ministry of Defense, on this base were Russian advisers who did not suffer. So there was a threat. But the bottom line is that who needs an ally who does not help repel attacks and destroy those who produce these attacks. That is why Russia has so few allies, no one needs an ally who only helps with concern.

Quote from a statement by the Ministry of Defense, copied from RIO

Three missiles, according to the Russian military, "reached the western part of the airfield." Five more were shot down by Syrian air defenses. Russian advisers were not hurt in the attack.

They do not write that the Russian military, advisers were not there, they write that they did not suffer. So they were there.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: gig334

They do not write that the Russian military, advisers were not there, they write that they did not suffer. So they were there

Logic, say ... indisputable.
When medications, for example, write "No animal is harmed" - does this mean that these animals ... were there at the factory manufacturing these drugs ...?

Quote: gig334

As far as I remember, it was about ...

He cited the link specifically, "what was discussed." Retelling "close to the text in your own words" - ineligible, sorry

[gig334]

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: gig334

They do not write that the Russian military, advisers were not there, they write that they did not suffer. So they were there

Logic, say ... indisputable.
When medications, for example, write "No animal is harmed" - does this mean that these animals ... were there at the factory manufacturing these drugs ...?

Quote: gig334

As far as I remember, it was about ...

He cited the link specifically, "what was discussed." Retelling "close to the text in your own words" - ineligible, sorry

When there are no Russian military at the bases. So it is reported. If someone was there, they write that there are no victims among the Russian military or advisers. But the meaning of otvetka is as follows: all missiles flying towards Syria and their carriers will be destroyed if they threaten the Russian military. I translate for those who do not understand the meaning of what has been said. Whoever launches these missiles, they will be destroyed. And as we see, these were empty words. And even if there weren’t Russian advisers, we’ll lose our reputation if we allow to launch rockets at our allies with impunity. Who wants to deal with Russia? Even the UK, Kazakhstan and Belarus are already turning their backs on us, doubting that we will help them if that. To the west stretch.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: gig334

When there are no Russian military at the bases. So it is reported. If someone was there, they write that there are no victims among the Russian military or advisers

Is this a rule - did you come up with it yourself, or is it still somewhere else?

Quote: gig334

And the meaning of the answer is ...

No need to repeat, I remember well what is the point.

Quote: gig334

as we see, these were empty words

You really want to prove it. But - here's the trouble - it doesn’t work

Quote: gig334

we lose our reputation

You yes. You still can't ...

Quote: gig334

... let’s launch rockets at our allies with impunity ...

Where, excuse me, did you find allies there? The contract, can you bring ... appropriate to the occasion?
One more time: Syria of the Russian Federation is not an ally. This is the alphabet.

Quote: gig334

Even SK, Kazakhstan and Belarus are already turning away from us ...

All. Even I have already turned my back on you ... although, actually, in life, it’s quite patient and sincere

[gig334]

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: gig334

They do not write that the Russian military, advisers were not there, they write that they did not suffer. So they were there

Logic, say ... indisputable.
When medications, for example, write "No animal is harmed" - does this mean that these animals ... were there at the factory manufacturing these drugs ...?

Quote: gig334

As far as I remember, it was about ...

He cited the link specifically, "what was discussed." Retelling "close to the text in your own words" - ineligible, sorry

There were Russian military too

[Golovan Jack]

Um ... if you have about twenty hours to look at this slag, then I don’t have (about twenty hours).
Literate people usually indicate the time on the video, from which, in their opinion, it is worth watching.
Next:
1. In my humble opinion, everyone who screams about a "violation of the word", "another failure of the Russian Federation", etc. - either alternatively gifted, or regular trolls.
2. The goal of the Russian Federation has been achieved - the Amertsians (so far, in any case) haven’t gone all-in, pin shots do not count.
3. Chasing Jews (if they were) is not comme il faut to our understanding - they have been at war with Syria since *** - the expired year, and they beat at the Syrian base on which their beloved Iranians are stationed.
These are purely local graters, and climbing into them is stupid, and therefore unnecessary.
4. The “Caution” from the Moscow Region was done very competently - we will decide when to “wet” and not someone will force us to do this.
5. Today's statement was also made correctly - no one claimed (and did not deny) the presence of the Russian military at the attacked base. They simply stated that there were no losses.
As a result, I personally have no complaints against the leadership of the Russian Federation and the Russian Defense Ministry.
If you have them - see paragraph 1.

[gig334]

Quote: Golovan Jack

.

You are weak-minded, you do not carefully read the information. Evidence I brought to you. And the fact that Your Majesty can not watch the video, he needs time to indicate (although they say about it in the first seconds of the video) and well ... wash it. this is not for me. I just proved with a roller that our military were there, and recalled the words of the Moscow Region.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: gig334

Evidence I brought to you

I already told you - this is slag, not evidence.

Quote: gig334

talk about it in the first seconds of the video

This is not - evidence. This is an OBS, you see.

Quote: gig334

I just proved with a roller ...

... your lack of critical thinking, perhaps ... and indeed the difficulty of the thinking process, as such.
Which was required, um, to prove.
* Inattentively - together, by the way.

[gig334]

Quote: Golovan Jack

Quote: gig334

Evidence I brought to you

I already told you - this is slag, not evidence.

Quote: gig334

talk about it in the first seconds of the video

This is not - evidence. This is an OBS, you see.

Quote: gig334

I just proved with a roller ...

... your lack of critical thinking, perhaps ... and indeed the difficulty of the thinking process, as such.
Which was required, um, to prove.
* Inattentively - together, by the way.

Everything is clear, the next peacock who does not want to admit his mistakes is weak-witted. But consider whatever you like, deny official data. Or write on the official channels and in the Moscow Region, write in the letter you are lying, there were no Russian military. Such things happen ... I still spent my time on this indignation.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: gig334

I still spent my time on this indignation

"Resentment" is me, hike? Cool so nobody called me yet

Quote: gig334

another peacock who does not want to admit his mistakes, that is weak-witted

Learn to write in Russian correctly ... passer-by
Come in short ... by

[pak1100]

Quote: Golovan Jack

As a result, I personally have no complaints against the leadership of the Russian Federation and the Russian Defense Ministry.
If you have them - see paragraph 1.

But I have, why didn’t they defend the base where our military, as well as the military of our allies, were? Where are the downed carriers and the destruction of missiles? Why is everything dumped on the old Syrian air defense? He has no questions, of course not, it's not your ass there, your ass is sitting on the sofa MO praises.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: pak1100

why didn’t they defend the base where our military were

And they were definitely?
Did they really have to be protected? Or are they ... themselves - with a mustache?

Quote: pak1100

Where are the downed carriers and the destruction of missiles?

See p. 3.

Quote: pak1100

Why is everything piled on the old Syrian air defense

See paragraph 3. These are old graters between the Syrians, their "allies" (namely "") Iranians and Jews. Nobody signed to climb into them, and this is very correct.

Quote: pak1100

your ass on the couch

My, um, ass runs like salted. This work

Quote: pak1100

MO praises

The army, by and large, is needed so that there is no war. Argue. Tire of swallowing dust

[Borik]

East Kazakhstan Concern Almaz-Antey will present at the international exhibition Defexpo India - 2018 layouts air defense systems and systems, including S-400,

And why lead the layout there is not easier and more visual to show these Indians everything with us. Let them feel with their hands and not look at the layouts then faster and buy something.

[ul_vitalii]

Tell me, they’ve gotten used to everyone’s attention, they have opened their mouths, they are waiting for when they will feed from a spoon. Everyone needs this, not them, that’s what they think.

[Lelek]

Quote: Borik

Let them feel with their hands and not look at the mockups then faster and buy something.

Already. India has disobeyed its overseas adviser and is acting in accordance with its national priorities.

[midshipman]

It would be desirable to introduce the aviation systems produced at the Concern. India is already using some of them.

[Cradle]

In the place of Indians and Turks, I would refuse this trash that has no analogues, a lot of crap for not a little money and the corpses of my soldiers ...