Military Review

Calculations of "Iskander" conducted an exercise in the Orenburg region

10
The calculations of the Iskander-M missile systems destroyed the objects of the conditional enemy by group electronic launches at the exercise in the Orenburg region, reports press office CVO.




Tasks were worked out in conditions as close as possible to the combat ones. The subdivisions were alarmed, made 40 km of march to the place of concentration on regular military equipment and successfully carried out electronic launches at specified coordinates at the Totsk training ground,
says release.

It is reported that the event was held as part of the final stage of the camp gathering of missile units of the 2-th army army. About 300 rocket men took part in it, more than 40 units of military equipment were involved.

OTRK "Iskander-M" is designed to destroy "anti-missile and air defense weapons, airplanes and helicopters at airfields, command posts and other important objects." The complex “is capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 400 km with high accuracy, it has high fire performance, mobility and maneuverability,” the press service said.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. konstantin68
    konstantin68 April 2 2018 11: 55
    +2
    Dear "partners", do not worry, this is not against you! It’s just missile training!
    1. Teberii
      Teberii April 2 2018 12: 06
      0
      It is important to get together, and the "partners" will survive.
  2. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD April 2 2018 12: 05
    +3
    The complex “is capable of hitting targets with a high accuracy at ranges of up to 400 km,
    It seems that before 500 officially .. Or are we again introducing confusion and reeling into the mind of a probable partner?
    1. barclay
      barclay April 2 2018 12: 12
      +1
      “Partners” do not need to know exact numbers. They must be ignorant.
    2. Don
      Don April 2 2018 12: 25
      +1
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      It seems that before 500 officially .. Or are we again introducing confusion and reeling into the mind of a probable partner?

      Each journalist has his own data, depending on the level of education.
    3. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii April 2 2018 12: 30
      +6
      Hi Victor hi This is for the bourgeoisie 400 and 500, but in my mind and more, it’s painful for our partners and partners to be lively, they want to keep us for fools. It's time to move away from these children's sizes, the agreement has long been breathing. smile
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD April 2 2018 12: 43
        +4
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        It's time to move away from these children's sizes, the contract has long been breathing

        Hello ! As if the contract was not ephemeral, but it was officially the first (to recognize winked ) do not violate ..
  3. axxmanm
    axxmanm April 2 2018 12: 46
    0
    It seems to me that it was more correct to make launchers with the expectation of one missile and not 2.
    And the car would be cheaper (up to the use of a civilian chassis and tracked version) and the flexibility of use would improve.
  4. Shadow shooter
    Shadow shooter April 2 2018 12: 54
    0
    Quote: axxmanm
    It seems to me that it was more correct to make launchers with the expectation of one missile and not 2.
    And the car would be cheaper (up to the use of a civilian chassis and tracked version) and the flexibility of use would improve.

    Absolutely wrong opinion, it will be development in the opposite direction negative
    1. axxmanm
      axxmanm April 2 2018 13: 23
      +1
      Quote: Shadow shooter
      Quote: axxmanm
      It seems to me that it was more correct to make launchers with the expectation of one missile and not 2.
      And the car would be cheaper (up to the use of a civilian chassis and tracked version) and the flexibility of use would improve.

      Absolutely wrong opinion, it will be development in the opposite direction negative

      Without explaining your position, it is your “absolutely erroneous opinion”.