Military Review

The upgraded anti-missile again showed itself to the test

27
A departmental newspaper of the Russian Ministry of Defense reported on tests of a modernized national antimissile. The test, as reported by the Red Star, was held at the Sary-Shagan test site in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Major-General Andrei Prikhodko, deputy commander of the air defense and anti-missile defense system of the Russian Federation, stated that the upgraded anti-missile successfully hit the target by completing the task at the appointed time.


The upgraded anti-missile again showed itself to the test


Earlier, the Russian Defense Ministry reported that in February, a test of the ORS-1M missile was conducted. The test was also conducted at the Sary-Shagan test site. In fact, we are talking about the modernization of the anti-missile 53Т6, the life of which actually expired by the year 2010. The new version is equipped with modern electronics, has a body of high-strength materials, including composite. Increased performance on anti-missile speed. The affected area has increased by about 50% in both height and range.

They plan to use the antimissile system to upgrade the missile defense system of the Moscow region
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 2 2018 05: 56
    +3
    This means that "modernization" flies and hits targets. good
    1. Vard
      Vard April 2 2018 05: 59
      +3
      In this regard, all that the Pentagon spends money can be briefly described ... not a horse feed ...
      1. Mwg
        Mwg April 2 2018 06: 06
        +3
        Or all that the Pentagon spends money on can be called even easier - the guno))))
      2. Teberii
        Teberii April 2 2018 09: 53
        +1
        The feed just gets exclusively to thoroughbred horses.
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 2 2018 06: 04
    +1
    Old ones cannot be modernized ad infinitum, new ones must be built!
    1. Berkut24
      Berkut24 April 2 2018 10: 22
      +2
      53T6 is a low-rise for the A-135. The system itself protects only Moscow, missiles most likely still have a nuclear charge. There is no sense in replacing it with anything. The system will survive its century and will be replaced by a completely different complex. Most likely, they will promote the A-235, where 3 types of short, medium and long range are supposed. The product that is being tested now, it seems to me, will occupy a niche in the near-field lesion with a kinetic head. In addition, it is assumed that the S-500 will partially take its place in the missile defense system, and there it will have its own missile with a much greater range.
      1. sedoj
        sedoj April 2 2018 12: 02
        +3
        Related Videos:
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 2 2018 15: 21
          +1
          Probably the most powerful turbojet engine ever created on this rocket is 15 Machs.
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter April 2 2018 06: 05
    +5
    Did not expect the "partners"? This is not rotten "patriots" to you ... It’s Russian missiles ...
  4. NEXUS
    NEXUS April 2 2018 06: 06
    +1
    Amur’s modernization is good, but how is it going with the Nudol A-235 project?
    1. Locksmith
      Locksmith April 2 2018 08: 33
      +5
      Quote: NEXUS
      how are things with the Nudol A-235 project?

      They somehow gathered us and ... congratulated us on the successful test of a rocket. They said that the rocket hit the target for the first time, that is, it kinetically struck. A week later I found out on the Internet about successful trials of nudoli. wink
  5. Mwg
    Mwg April 2 2018 06: 09
    +4
    Our armored train stands on a siding. Under the pairs.
    Afraid ..... bad people
    (moderator, he would have given the opportunity to use profanity at least a little bit sometimes. Otherwise, you are chopping a song in the bud ...)
    1. demo
      demo April 2 2018 06: 24
      +5

      I think that the deflection is counted ?!
      1. Mwg
        Mwg April 2 2018 19: 07
        0
        Eeee. I also tried, it does not help. I already have two warnings))))
  6. Shurale
    Shurale April 2 2018 06: 21
    0
    They plan to use the antimissile system to upgrade the missile defense system of the Moscow region

    But is she going to go somewhere else besides protecting the Muskva?
    1. utyutkin
      utyutkin April 2 2018 08: 21
      +2
      so there’s no more agreement on pro :) now rivet the lope missiles you want a little and put where you want.
      1. bulvas
        bulvas April 2 2018 08: 49
        +2
        Quote: Shurale
        They plan to use the antimissile system to upgrade the missile defense system of the Moscow region

        But is she going to go somewhere else besides protecting the Muskva?


        Now, as the missile defense is gone, they will probably be put in other places
    2. Orionvit
      Orionvit April 2 2018 14: 15
      +4
      Quote: Shurale
      But is she going to go somewhere else besides protecting the Muskva?

      If you still do not know, then the city, which you scornfully call "masykva", is the capital of the Russian Federation. Make a proposal that instead of Moscow, all air defense forces would be thrown to the defense of some kind of "muhos.r..a.n..ska", or where are you from there. By the way, I do not feel much love for the capital cities, but here you are clearly wrong.
  7. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 2 2018 07: 06
    +1
    Quote: Vard
    In this regard, all that the Pentagon spends money can be briefly described ... not a horse feed ...


    And GMO food, and the horse has long been not the same!
  8. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 2 2018 07: 08
    +1
    Quote: NEXUS
    Amur’s modernization is good, but how is it going with the Nudol A-235 project?

    The process is underway! But we won’t tell you about it (lyrics from the song).
  9. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 2 2018 07: 10
    0
    Quote: Herkulesich
    Old ones cannot be modernized ad infinitum, new ones must be built!

    Are there any new ideas? And then, after all, the former have already exhausted themselves ...
  10. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 2 2018 07: 12
    0
    Not only flies and knocks down, but also doesn’t let some sleep peacefully!
  11. alex-cn
    alex-cn April 2 2018 07: 33
    +1
    We agreed with the Chinese, and Tiangun fell where it certainly didn’t bother anyone. bully
  12. solovald
    solovald April 2 2018 08: 46
    0
    The affected area increased by about 50% in both height and range.

    Major improvement.
  13. san4es
    san4es April 2 2018 08: 57
    +2
    In fact, we are talking about the modernization of the 53T6 missile defense, the life of which actually expired by 2010

    Range:
    - 80-100 km
    - 20.8 km (range launches 53T6)
    Damage height:
    - 5000-30000 m
    - 14000 m (range launches 53T6)
    Speed:
    - 10-14 M (according to one data)
    - 5200-5500 m / s (according to other data)
    - 4000 m / s (according to other data)
    - up to 3600 m / s (source - Russian Shield)
    Rate of climb - 30000 m height per 5-6 s
    Acceleration to maximum speed - 3-4 s (according to various sources)
    The exit time from the mine from the moment of launch is 0.2-0.4 s
    Maximum overloads:
    - 210G longitudinal
    - 90 G transverse
    Missile deflection angle after launch - up to 70 degrees
    Guaranteed shelf life is at least 10 years, possibly with an extension of up to 15-20 years based on the results of additional tests and improvements. soldier
  14. Old26
    Old26 April 2 2018 10: 59
    +1
    Quote: ututyulkin
    so there’s no more agreement on pro :) now rivet the lope missiles you want a little and put where you want.

    Yeah. Piece 10 ship us, to the south. You can 20.

    Damn, you can rivet at least a thousand pieces - it would be time, money and factories on which to rivet. But missile defense is primarily RADAR. not missile defense. And to build them long enough and expensive. Moreover, any missile defense system simply multiplies by zero by increasing the number of targets. That is why, in order to prevent an uncontrolled arms race, there was an agreement, first on two areas, and then on one area with a clearly limited number of radars and interceptors

    Quote: san4es
    In fact, we are talking about the modernization of the 53T6 missile defense, the life of which actually expired by 2010

    Range:
    - 80-100 km
    - 20.8 km (range launches 53T6)
    Damage height:
    - 5000-30000 m
    - 14000 m (range launches 53T6)
    Speed:
    - 10-14 M (according to one data)
    - 5200-5500 m / s (according to other data)
    - 4000 m / s (according to other data)
    - up to 3600 m / s (source - Russian Shield)
    Rate of climb - 30000 m height per 5-6 s
    Acceleration to maximum speed - 3-4 s (according to various sources)
    The exit time from the mine from the moment of launch is 0.2-0.4 s
    Maximum overloads:
    - 210G longitudinal
    - 90 G transverse
    Missile deflection angle after launch - up to 70 degrees
    Guaranteed shelf life is at least 10 years, possibly with an extension of up to 15-20 years based on the results of additional tests and improvements. soldier

    Even 15-20 years ago, the general designer of this missile defense said that it has a modernization potential to increase the affected area by about 40-50%. Which is now done. That's just until all these tests are carried out for "conditional" purposes. Nobody repeats the tests that were during the creation of the B-1000. Namely, when a real rocket was launched from Kapyar in the direction of Sary-Shagan. And so it turns out that the "conditional" target is hit. That is, the interceptor came to the area where the conditional target is located according to the plan
  15. telobezumnoe
    telobezumnoe April 2 2018 19: 25
    0
    and that they don’t trumpet that it is hypersonic, like its predecessor?