Russian T-90А demonstrate their invulnerability near Damascus

In recent weeks Tanks T-90A as part of the Tiger Force brigade is actively involved in a large-scale operation in Eastern Ghouta, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

“Tanks demonstrate exceptional survivability during urban fights. This is facilitated by the Blind-mounted optical-electronic suppression systems installed on the machines, which create a field of continuous interference to a depth of 2,5 km and a width of more than 800. As a result, the enemy’s anti-tank guided missiles are effectively neutralized, ”the article says.

It is noted that thanks to the “Shtore”, the tanks are also capable of covering the armored vehicles of the old modifications coming with them in combat formations.

The effectiveness of the T-90A is also facilitated by the presence of a modern ESSA night-vision thermal sight, which makes it possible to detect and destroy various targets, including camouflaged grenade launchers.

Another feature of the tank is a closed anti-aircraft machine-gun system, hitting the enemy at a distance of 2 km. The rate of fire of the 12,7-mm machine gun reaches 700 shots / min.

The newspaper reminds that T-90 has been located on the territory of the CAP since the beginning of October 2015. They participated in all the major battles of recent years, while suffering minimal losses.

Comments

[kenig1]

Sweat ???)) Let the barmalei sweat with fear.

[demo]

Better not to sweat, because they’re dead.

[oleg-gr]

"Tanks demonstrate exceptional survivability during battles in urban environments."
You can’t imagine a better UVZ advertisement.

[evil partisan]

Quote: demo

Better not to sweat, because they’re dead.

The doctor was late for a call to the patient and he died. To somehow make excuses, he asks the relatives and friends of the deceased:
“Did you sweat the patient before death?”
-Yes.
-Very well.
So: let them sweat!

[Vadivak]

Opposition T-90 A

[Letun]

Quote: Vadivak

Opposition T-90 A

So ours didn’t seem to supply the opposition with the T-90 A. I wonder how he got to them ...

[Dart2027]

Quote: Letun

I wonder how he got to them.

They captured a couple of years ago. I don’t remember the details, but there was an article on VO.

[VOLCHOXURAL]

Yes, it was, I also forgot the details of the current. It seems that the tank was immobilized and the tankers abandoned it without being able to mine.

[taiga2018]

successful action in real battles is the best advertisement ...

[Terminolol]

“they are also capable of covering up armored vehicles of old modifications going with them in battle formations” - well, if only he flies through it. More likely an exception than a rule. So it would be easiest to make a special machine that would specifically cover other equipment in this way.

[Pervy]

Quote: Terminol

“they are also capable of covering up armored vehicles of old modifications going with them in battle formations” - well, if only he flies through it. More likely an exception than a rule. So it would be easiest to make a special machine that would specifically cover other equipment in this way.

They cover up the fact that they interfere with anti-tank missiles, this probably means that. Covering other equipment with the tank itself is stupid.

[Bad_santa]

Not a special vehicle, but a whole tank for a purely urban battle. Let's say based on the t-72. With circular protection and the ability to withstand 10-15 hits of cumulative projectiles from all projections

[Romka47]

The tank is simply a masterpiece, though the TOW2 "curtain" (exactly 2) does not jam, but the forehead of the tower keeps it directly

[Vadivak]

Quote: Romka47

The tank is just a masterpiece

T-90M cooler

[Romka47]

Of course cooler, by the way, there are no "curtains" on it, since it’s already unnecessary.

[Professor]

Advertising, advertising, advertising.

[starogil]

Well, I’m not a cart, "merkava", here in VO, to advertise.

[rocket757]

And what do we advertise the "divine chariot"? Hezbollah yourself to help you.

[st25310]

The only tank fully tested with mileage in Saudi Arabia. And also the only tank in general, tested in Malaysia, tested in India. The only one to pass all the tests flawlessly in 2014, unlike Leclerc, Abrams, Leopard in Kuwait.
Amazed more than 60% of targets during tests on which no other tank (Abrams, Leopard) reached 60%

[mvg]

Do not remind which technique Kuwait chose after testing? And KSA or Malaysia? And India bought them after the transfer of technology.
Absolutely stupid news.

[Black Colonel]

It is important to comply with these same technologies, which is not given to everyone.

[Awaz]

in many countries honesty in choosing a supplier? In some countries, rollbacks are resolved, in others, stupidly financial threats. Well and most importantly, most countries buy tanks not for war but for parades and show off .. Our tanks are certainly handsome (except perhaps Almaty) outwardly even, but ... Russian tanks would not even invite such test drives, but probably Americans are curious what kind of Russian tanks they are and buyers have the option of bargaining a bit with the Americans at the time of those characteristics and prices

[Vadivak]

Quote: professor

Advertising, advertising, advertising.

You understand the engine of trade. Hi Oleg

[Denisey]

Quote: professor

Advertising, advertising, advertising.

Professor, at VO more than once you were told about double standards. Now you again confirm your reputation - Israeli weapons are the best +, American best, NATO good, Russian only advertising.

[Professor]

But what if this is not advertising? "Tanks exhibit exceptional survivability during battles in urban environments." Where is the proof "exceptional vitality"What did they fire at? From what angle? What are the results? We won’t hear any of this. Only advertising.

[Black Colonel]

Well, Americans all over the world shout about the exclusivity of abrashek., Which are not like the T-90 less involved in the alterations, while remaining combat-ready.

[Denisey]

Quote: professor

But what if this is not advertising? "Tanks exhibit exceptional survivability during battles in urban environments." Where is the proof "exceptional vitality"What did they fire at? From what angle? What are the results? We won’t hear any of this. Only advertising.

So you are talking about the "exceptional" security of the "carrot", all the proposals to write more about your tank in the VO refuse, arguing the refusal of secrecy (your double standards in action). But, shout that publications about the T-90 are advertising and require detailed information on the combat use of the T-90. Yeah, everyone runs to you (not personally, but to those who are interested in sitting on the site) to write about the tank and write the hair back.

[Professor]

Quote: denisey

So you are talking about the "exceptional" security "carrots"

I never wrote this. Check out in my comments.

Quote: denisey

to answer all proposals in more detail about your tank in VO, you refuse, arguing the refusal with secrecy (your double standards in action).

Do not fantasize. I never wrote that.

Quote: denisey

But, shout that publications about the T-90 are advertising and require detailed information on the combat use of the T-90. Yeah, everyone runs to you (not personally, but to those who are interested in the site sitting on the site) to write down the layouts about the tank and the hair back

Exactly. Not confirmed by anything reports of "exceptional security" is nothing more than cheap advertising. That how this tax-exempt tank is not protected you all saw on YouTube. I would like to see the opposite, but I’m sure that I will not see it because of the secrecy of the data.

[Adlik]

Due to the fact that several dozens of such vehicles take part in combat operations, and the number of those destroyed is counted by several units, this indicates the survivability and security of the vehicle, especially when comparing the 72

[Professor]

Quote: Adlik

Due to the fact that several dozens of such vehicles take part in combat operations, and the number of those destroyed is counted by several units, this indicates the survivability and security of the vehicle, especially when comparing the 72

Not. This does not mean anything. The old T-72 can be thrown into hell, and the extremely protected one can be cleaned after it or even cherished as a very expensive thing. Where are the statistics?

[mvg]

Indeed, "Professor", where are your articles, and you at VO once wrote a lot of things.

[Vadivak]

Quote: professor

That how this tax-exempt tank is not protected you all saw on YouTube.

still these distributions ... and never use a curtain

[Albert1988]

Quote: professor

That how this tax-exempt tank is not protected you all saw on YouTube.

We saw how his armor was NOT pierced by TOU ... This, undoubtedly, is a clear sign of NOT security

[Professor]

Quote: Albert1988

Quote: professor

That how this tax-exempt tank is not protected you all saw on YouTube.

We saw how his armor was NOT pierced by TOU ... This, undoubtedly, is a clear sign of NOT security

And do not show us how the ATGM of the 1960's did not break through the armor of the exceptionally protected T-90?

[Denisey]

Professor, Lebanon, 2006 year Israeli tanks - what more to say?

[Professor]

Quote: denisey

Professor, Lebanon, 2006 year Israeli tanks - what more to say?

Yes to speak. Five (five Karl) irretrievable losses. Go on.

PS
Here is a video of the hezbalons. Merkava 1 in Lebanon.

[Denisey]

I didn’t speak in the context of losses, I talked about the fact that “carrots” are about the same year of release with the T-72 (T-90 modification of it) and your tanks are nothing better than the “exceptionally protected T-90” in terms of protection when used correctly with anti-tank systems .

[Professor]

Quote: denisey

I didn’t speak in the context of losses, I talked about the fact that “carrots” are about the same year of release with the T-72 (T-90 modification of it) and your tanks are nothing better than the “exceptionally protected T-90” in terms of protection when used correctly with anti-tank systems .

Yes, yes. 5 irretrievable losses when using TOU, Cornets, Vampires and other "gifts". Whether the case is extremely protected.

You compare T-90 with Merkava-4, and not with Merkova-1 - the same age as T-72.

Quote: denisey

I do not serve in the IDF, but in Tyrnet, who writes as. Who writes that 4 "carrot" with Trophy is 5, who writes that since 2012 Merkava-5 is being tested. Someone like on the wiki “The next generation will not be the Merkava-5, but a tank with other fire, protective, and propulsion characteristics.” That is, everything is foggy at the moment. I adhere to the fact that Merkava-5 is Merkava-4 + Trophy (and naturally a super new filling)

Merkava-5 is not present and it never will be.

[Denisey]

Ahh ..., but I thought that the deep modernization of the T-72, not a competitor developed in 2004 Merkave-4
That is, when necessary, Merkava-4 is a new development and your T-72 - T-90, junk, BUT you can turn in another way

Quote: professor

You compare T-90 with Merkava-4, and not with Merkova-1 - the same age as T-72.

Wonderful

[Professor]

Quote: denisey

Wonderful

Exactly. Need to compare peers. Nevertheless, we were distracted. Develop the theme of Lebanon as promised. Tell me how many tanks were lost on the landmines and how many from PRTK.

[Denisey]

Not to mention the fact that the data loss varies. That is, we take your losses and other data and 15-16 l / s and 10-12 tanks come out (this is a very primitive calculation)

[Denisey]

PS
You have Merkava -5, ours manage to modify T-72 to an acceptable result ...

[omit]

Denisey
"You have a Merkava -5, ours manage to modify the T-72 to an acceptable result ..."

Dear, Merkava-5 does not exist in nature, and in the project either.

[Denisey]

I do not serve in the IDF, but in Tyrnet, who writes as. Who writes that 4 "carrot" with Trophy is 5, who writes that since 2012 Merkava-5 is being tested. Someone like on the wiki “The next generation will not be the Merkava-5, but a tank with other fire, protective, and propulsion characteristics.” That is, everything is foggy at the moment. I adhere to the fact that Merkava-5 is Merkava-4 + Trophy (and naturally a super new filling)

[ljoha_d]

why there is no closed anti-aircraft mount on the t-72 b3, because it is clear to everyone that it is needed and no one in the defense department wants to remove or at least try to fix all the jambs from this leaky trough.

[pepel79]

One advertisement ... no examples for you ... no video ... the tank is really good, but reading only odes, without any specifics, is already tired ...
And finally, a small banter ... “Tanks demonstrate exceptional survivability during battles in urban conditions. This is facilitated by the installed on the machine optical-electronic suppression systems "Blind", which create a field of continuous interference with a depth of up to 2,5 km and a width of more than 800 m ....
During battles in urban conditions, the Shtora, and not the DZ and the main armor, demonstrate the exceptional survivability of this MBT, since the length of the streets of the Syrian cities exceeds the field of continuous jamming by 2,5 km, and their width can not be compared at all. ..