NATO fears Russia will seize control of the Northern Sea Route

84
Russia during 2-3 years can get full control over the Northern Sea Route, it is constantly increasing its presence in the Arctic, the United States does not have time for it, reports TASS Statement by General Curtis Scaparrotti, Commander-in-Chief of NATO Combined Armed Forces in Europe.





Most of this is restored old bases, from about seven to nine, in particular, those located at the beginning and at the end of the Northern Sea Route. And these are key places. So we are closely following this in the context of the militarization of the Arctic,
said Scaparrotti at the Senate hearing.

They (the Russian military) declare their intention to ensure the protection and security of economic well-being in the Arctic, the general added.

However, “based on what they place there, for some time, maybe two or three years, they will have the opportunity to control the Northern Sea Route if they want,” he noted.

On the question of whether the forces of the two countries are equal in the Arctic today, Scaparrotti replied:

We are lagging behind.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    12 March 2018 12: 37
    Correctly fear. Since the days of Papanin, in addition to the USSR and Russia, only German submarines were present there for some time.
    1. +2
      12 March 2018 12: 40
      Yes. And the German raiders.
      1. +56
        12 March 2018 12: 45
        It is strange that they are not afraid that Russia will seize control of the Moscow region. There are generally Russian troops dofig, and without a UN mandate
        1. +37
          12 March 2018 12: 50
          The NSR always belonged to Russia, period.
          1. +11
            12 March 2018 12: 53
            That's it. And right up to the North Pole .. Already ours ..
            Quote: Going
            The NSR always belonged to Russia, period.
            1. +18
              12 March 2018 13: 03
              Quote: 210ox
              That's it. And right up to the North Pole .. Already ours ..

              Here are the mattresses provocateurs. We are surprised that Russia will control its own economic zone
              1. +6
                12 March 2018 15: 17
                Moore
                What political naivety ?!
                Thanks to the large-scale European presence, Siberia could eventually turn into a pan-Eurasian heritage, the use of which would occur on a multilateral basis,

                This “common Eurasian” property would end in nothing more than a demand from the West for Russia to get the Russians and Russia away somewhere in the planetary sense!
                For some reason, for example, it doesn’t occur to anyone to hint at the same United States about the “global” northern route around Alaska as a global asset!
                1. jjj
                  +7
                  12 March 2018 17: 26
                  So Vladimirovich told them last week that if Russia does not exist in the world, then why such a world is needed at all. How many people in the West simultaneously fell into a stupor
              2. +2
                12 March 2018 20: 12
                Quote: Chertt
                Quote: 210ox
                That's it. And right up to the North Pole .. Already ours ..

                Here are the mattresses provocateurs. We are surprised that Russia will control its own economic zone


                Excuse me, what are they provocateurs? They only help, they want to support the Russian Federation for a small percentage, some 70-80 percent. from the entire turnover, but the right to property, so for 100 years. They are peaceful, exclusively democrats ...
            2. Hey
              +5
              12 March 2018 14: 36
              Correctly, still before my eyes, are maps of the USSR with borders to the very north pole.
          2. +4
            12 March 2018 13: 49
            Little does it belong to us. Like the fact that we control it. Without merchant ships he is dead. Yes, our ships go along it, but they are ridiculously small. And our ports / bases are relatively few there and they are very small and underdeveloped.
            We have it but still need to use it to the fullest. This is of course a matter of time, but now you need to attract all potential customers. Of course, for many reasons, it will not be when it will not be as attractive as the South Way, but we need to increase our piece.
            1. +2
              12 March 2018 14: 16
              Quote: seti
              And our ports / bases are relatively few there and they are very small and underdeveloped.

              belay yeah Yes such as Murmansk for example.
              1. +2
                12 March 2018 15: 35
                Which one you are smart. Just forgot to write that Murmansk is finite NSR port that starts in Shanghai. Do we also have such cities on the NSR?
                The answer is obvious.
                1. +2
                  12 March 2018 17: 40
                  like Vizbor’s song: .. "Smiling at the picture, A lady in the ice travels with us: New Igarka, Madame, Los Dudinka, Tiksi Foreign Village."
                2. +1
                  13 March 2018 09: 15
                  Arkhangelsk, for example. The White Sea is inland.
            2. 0
              13 March 2018 16: 23
              little agree, but who said that they will appear at the click of a finger? and the ship sailing in the northern latitudes is completely different even from a similar one somewhere in the Pacific Ocean. and what do you think it makes sense to build up "maintaining the security of the QMS" without having plans to provide the QMS with a merchant fleet?
        2. +2
          12 March 2018 12: 56
          Well, if the late pan Zbyshek assured that:
          Thanks to its large-scale European presence, Siberia could eventually turn into a pan-Eurasian heritage, the use of which would occur on a multilateral basis,
          then your question doesn’t seem very impossible ...
    2. +22
      12 March 2018 12: 44
      "There never was such a thing, and here again ..." smile Wake up general, Russia has been controlling the Northern Sea Route for 90 for years.
      1. +14
        12 March 2018 12: 52
        Greetings hi They didn’t report to him. lol
        1. +14
          12 March 2018 13: 20
          Good afternoon, namesake! hi
          Quote: Going
          Greetings hi They didn’t report to him. lol

          I have a great suspicion that he was not shown a geographical map either. laughing
          1. +7
            12 March 2018 13: 40
            Quote: Monos
            I have a great suspicion that he was not shown a geographical map either.

            Good health hi
            And they don’t have to, they already consider the whole world their own.
            Just sometimes, in some places there are "misunderstandings" with their "property" winked
            1. +5
              12 March 2018 13: 57
              Greetings, Vitaliy hi
              Quote: Deadush
              And they don’t have to, they already consider the whole world their own.

              Disappointment awaits them. smile
              1. +4
                12 March 2018 14: 06
                Quote: Monos
                Disappointment awaits them.

                Yes, I agree ...
                but they, like small children, do not relent (and do not understand this) ...
                roll on the floor and scream - mine (want)! laughing
    3. +5
      12 March 2018 12: 52
      The mattresses are great, they live on the principle that “mine is mine, and we will defeat yours now.”
      And not that the Northern Sea Route pass in our exclusive economic zone ?! Near (and sometimes through) our territorial waters! Skip to the end ahr ... l or what? !!! am
      1. +2
        12 March 2018 12: 56
        NATO fears Russia will seize control of the Northern Sea Route
        And rightly so, that they fear. The Arctic, like Crimea, will be ours.
    4. +10
      12 March 2018 13: 13
      They (the Russian military) declare their intention to ensure the protection and security of economic well-being in the Arctic, the general added.

      A miracle in the feathers, wake up, you spoil the air, our military has been controlling the Northern Sea Route for 90 years, it’s better to sleep on a cloud in your pants. laughing
      1. +3
        12 March 2018 15: 31
        Quote: vlad66
        A miracle in feathers, wake up, you spoil the air

        Curtis burns as always .. laughing
        Psak ordinary ..
  2. +13
    12 March 2018 12: 38
    The Northern Sea Route is the territory of Russia!
    1. +13
      12 March 2018 13: 38
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      The Northern Sea Route is the territory of Russia!

      Sergei hi I have a suspicion that this body does not know where the Arctic and Russia are. request
      1. +3
        12 March 2018 16: 48
        Vlad, I remind you that on the maps of the USSR, the border ran along the North Pole ... and Russia is the legal successor of the Union, so this time schizoid of NATO should rest ... hi
  3. +5
    12 March 2018 12: 39
    Yeah, let the guys let us have no reason to go there ... Develop your northwest passage ... and forget about our Arctic, the train has already left for you ...
  4. +2
    12 March 2018 12: 42
    Was NATO worried about the hell? And what they have to do with the Northern Sea Route .. it has always been controlled by Russia and passes in our waters. And even more so, the USA is not in business here .. although they are a plug to all holes ..
  5. +4
    12 March 2018 12: 44
    they want to control all oil and gas fields and they fear
  6. +5
    12 March 2018 12: 50
    Within 2-3 years, Russia can gain complete control over the Northern Sea Route, it is constantly increasing its presence in the Arctic, the United States is not keeping pace with it,

    As they say, LATE THROW. The Russian Federation has the largest icebreaker fleet in the world. At the same time, the Arctic force grouping is equipped and equipped as a priority. What did the USA do in response? Decided to build in 10 years a couple of icebreakers?
    Russia ALREADY controls the northern route. And with the equipment of the Northern Fleet, NATO ships will generally have nothing to catch in those parts.
    And at the same time, we must already think about the Atlantic.
    1. +2
      12 March 2018 13: 19
      The infrastructure is especially well-developed along the north of the sea. But if you want to go, you don’t count, because we have the largest icebreaker fleet, the current is "a little" unprofitable. And so the entire coast of the Arctic Ocean is thriving. Can you answer why there is practically no towns, villages and towns along the coast?
      1. +6
        12 March 2018 13: 23
        Quote: Korax71
        can then you answer why there are practically no villages, villages and towns along the coast?

        Because nothing is produced, mined, and so on ... now they started to do it. And a man seeks where he lives better. You would not have lived in a dying village north only from patriotic motives, right?
  7. +2
    12 March 2018 12: 50
    And they also gaped at the Northern Sea Route? And do not choke?
  8. +5
    12 March 2018 12: 51
    Already under control. Woke up late .. =))
  9. +2
    12 March 2018 12: 52
    some wildness, almost the entire SevMorPut along our terr. water passes, if my memory serves me.
    Already insolent in the land
    1. jjj
      +1
      12 March 2018 17: 33
      So much for territorial waters - 12 miles. But there is still the concept of inland waters. And if you bring the basis under the New Earth, the Land of Frans Joseph, then the reference line of territorial waters goes far to the pole. And it turns out that the Northern Sea Route passes mostly through the inland waters of Russia. Against this and gonosh. But if our bases are on the Arctic lands, then no adversary can stick their flag there
  10. +2
    12 March 2018 12: 52
    No, still here and there, if it was about Alaska, the Northwest Passage, it would be possible to understand, but the NSR is touching them sideways! Db!
  11. +10
    12 March 2018 12: 53
    Let them make their way north, the ice is thicker there. smile
  12. +2
    12 March 2018 12: 55
    The Northern Sea Route has always been Russian. No?
    The only thing America can claim is its half of the Bering Strait.
  13. +5
    12 March 2018 12: 56
    The brakes. The SevMorPut and ours was ours, and you’ll cut it off as if they didn’t want it.
    1. +3
      12 March 2018 13: 11
      They had Wishlist, but the infamous video of how a super submarine storms the ice in the North (with the comments of our helicopter pilots) slightly cooled their ardor.
      Aren't the exacerbation again?
  14. +1
    12 March 2018 12: 56
    And what, there are Amer’s troops on our coast? Or the United States has icebreakers that can sail in these latitudes.
  15. +2
    12 March 2018 12: 56
    Another voice in a pack of hollow dogs, according to the flocking instinct, who creep unreasonably and brainless towards Russia, it doesn’t matter what, it doesn’t matter what, the main thing is to bark in the same direction where the whole pack howls
  16. +4
    12 March 2018 13: 10
    Figase! It is strange that they are afraid of something there. This is our project, our Northern Way! It would be over idiocy if it was controlled by Europeans with Americans! It is clear that there are also countries there that border the Arctic. But not one of them can make the trade route! But to use it - there is a whole turn! America and Europe have their own trade routes that are not beneficial to us, but beneficial to them. And to control other people's trade routes, of course, anyone wants to)))))
    1. +2
      12 March 2018 13: 26
      Quote: ALLxANDr
      America and Europe have their own trade routes that are not beneficial to us, but beneficial to them.

      They do not have such trade routes from Europe to the Far East. SMP is the shortest ...
      1. +2
        12 March 2018 15: 37
        Who argues! But if we were talking about Europe ...

        Within 2-3 years, Russia can gain complete control over the Northern Sea Route, it is constantly increasing its presence in the Arctic, the United States is not keeping pace with it


        But where does the United States? Nobody wants to sail to Alaska and through Alaska .. But the Europeans are not able to make the northern sea route outside the zone of influence of Russia, because say in international waters (there it’s just stupidly thicker ice).
  17. +1
    12 March 2018 13: 18
    In vain worry, Messrs. Americans. Already now you have a good constipation in this place, up to a twist (as you want, so understand). As one comedic hero used to say: do you still have to bring the keys to the apartment where the money is !? You have your own belt, dance there!
  18. 0
    12 March 2018 13: 23
    The North Sea Route is defined by the legislation of the Russian Federation as “the historically developed national unified transport communication of Russia in the Arctic”.
    It is very good that we control it, and not the US Navy.

    This is a plus for our politicians !!! Could and miss! Well, ours know how to fuck ...
  19. +3
    12 March 2018 13: 27
    It is impossible to control it entirely. he passes by several countries. But!! - Most of it runs along our borders, so the “controlling stake” in the Volunteer-Nevolence NSR is located due to geographical features. And we can always reinforce these features with arguments (from other branches of natural sciences) ..
  20. +2
    12 March 2018 13: 28
    Our path means our control. Dry the pin!
  21. +1
    12 March 2018 13: 33
    And you need to "capture". The Northern Sea Route is our transport artery; with its help, everything that is needed is delivered to the remote northern regions of our country. The Northern Sea Route belonged and will belong to Russia. Therefore, no one should meddle there. And whoever snoops around with his charter should get a snot. Otherwise, tomorrow they will go to Siberia.
  22. +1
    12 March 2018 13: 35
    They are completely fucked up there - this path goes through ours
    territorial waters, what claims may be
    NATO - of course, will get in the forehead if something sticks out
    change. We have enough knives (daggers) for everyone, as
    used to say the famous character from the "Meeting Place ..."
  23. +3
    12 March 2018 13: 45
    Most of this is restored old bases, from about seven to nine, in particular, those located at the beginning and at the end of the Northern Sea Route. And these are key places. So we are closely following this in the context of the militarization of the Arctic,


    And the presence of Russian atomic icebreakers at the NSR is absolutely unacceptable.

    In short, db. Go learn geography lol
  24. +3
    12 March 2018 13: 53
    I didn’t understand something. Does this scaparotti worry that Russia will “seize control” of what belongs to it already? He had not yet had time to worry that Russia might “seize control,” say, of Sakhalin?
  25. +2
    12 March 2018 14: 08
    Wait a minute, the NSR is the internal territorial waters of the Russian Federation, the control of which, by default, belongs to their owner. There is no one who does not surpass the borzometer ???
    But Mr. Scaparotti and his lads have nothing to do there !!!
  26. +1
    12 March 2018 14: 12
    And what does NATO have to do with the NSR ???
  27. 0
    12 March 2018 14: 33
    And how did they want?!, - the control is and will be ours, from all sorts of parasites.
  28. +1
    12 March 2018 14: 43
    Quote: Dembel 77
    NATO fears Russia will seize control of the Northern Sea Route
    And rightly so, that they fear. The Arctic, like Crimea, will be ours.

    I do not understand ... They were, are and will be ours !!! hi
  29. +1
    12 March 2018 14: 48
    Including Alaska. Well, holding a Labrador and Greenland-Iceland at gunpoint. Alaska is ours!
  30. +1
    12 March 2018 15: 18
    NATO degenerates and guess that the Northern Sea Route
  31. 0
    12 March 2018 15: 20
    NATO fears Russia will seize control of the Northern Sea Route

    what the next will capture BAM, the Volga ?!
  32. 0
    12 March 2018 15: 20
    the question is, are the forces of the two countries equal in the Arctic today, Scaparrotti answered:
    "We are behind."

    You flatter yourself very much, General tongue
  33. 0
    12 March 2018 16: 23
    The Northern Sea Route runs along the Russian coast and therefore the protection of these communications by Russia is more than justified.
  34. +1
    12 March 2018 16: 24
    NATO fears Russia will seize control of the Northern Sea Route

    Those. take control of themselves?
  35. +1
    12 March 2018 17: 51
    You’re not just falling behind the Yankees, you don’t even fall into the dust, and you won’t see the sea route like your own ass
  36. 0
    12 March 2018 20: 51
    But does the NSR not pass completely in the territorial waters of the Russian Federation?
    1. 0
      12 March 2018 21: 18
      the state senate is overheated with fakes about the Russian Federation, and they don’t have enough knowledge of economic geography, and therefore, the general is loading this audience, and he himself knows whose cream is licking his lips)).
      1. LIP
        0
        20 March 2018 18: 52
        The Russian schoolchild has more intelligence than the NATO generals!
  37. +1
    12 March 2018 21: 16
    no need to be afraid, this path is ours, and you have nothing to do there
  38. 0
    12 March 2018 21: 30
    Let them control the Gulf of Mexico.
  39. +1
    12 March 2018 22: 16
    The general is absolutely right! That is what we want! And I believe! We will control not only the NSR.
  40. 0
    12 March 2018 23: 01
    laughing In fact, it is already under control, since for the most part it passes through the territorial waters of Russia.
  41. +2
    13 March 2018 00: 46
    I go nuts with them. The NSR along the northern border of Russia passes entirely in our territorial waters. You can, of course, sail even further north, but without the possibility of an emergency or planned stop at our ports, the risk of carriers increases greatly.
  42. +1
    13 March 2018 08: 52
    And what do Americans have to do with Our Northern Sea Route?
  43. 0
    16 March 2018 10: 01
    We are behind.)))
    You are in big oppa because You don’t have so many icebreakers. And without them there’s nothing to do.
  44. +1
    16 March 2018 17: 53
    And, to be honest - THERE ARE DANGEROUS? !!! This path through life belonged to Russia. The Americans there, as in other things and in Syria in general, do not x ... th !! ! Not a dream or a snout ... The Russians explored the northern path through life, the rest worked as hangovers ... The mattresses have already destroyed one continent, now all over the world like cockroaches ... It's time to show them a red pencil.
  45. +1
    16 March 2018 18: 00
    Nooo !!! Well guys !!! I myself saw James Bond in the Arctic latitudes making a rustle !!! Yes, you what? !!! Did not look? This is shown on the telly !!! He piled such Russian there ... !!! So - twist, don't twist, the Northern Sea Route - this is the prerogative of America and England ... Well, there is Nezalezhnaya there (they pierce the ice there for life) ... In general, shut up and sit (until the US calls to take their cruisers out from the cursed ice) lol
  46. LIP
    0
    20 March 2018 18: 49
    And what right do star-whales have on the Northern Sea Route? Did they open it ?! Even Mikhailo Lomonosov in the 18th century wrote: - "Russian Colomb despising moody rock, they will lay a new path between the ice to the East." And the Navy guards the entrances to this path from the west, and the Pacific Fleet from the east. Let them go ...
  47. 0
    23 March 2018 12: 15
    Late, it all happened already.
  48. 0
    30 March 2018 00: 00
    "Take control" ... "Take" from whom? The SF never “lost” this “control”, while NATO did not have and will not foresee any offspring at the NSR. Cocks Anglo-Saxon language, damn it.