In Syria, crashed An-26 RFL. 32 man died

372
The Information Department of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation publishes urgent information about the crash of a military transport aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria. From the message:
6 March around 15.00 (Moscow time) during the landing approach at the Khmeimim airfield the Russian transport aircraft An-26 crashed. According to preliminary data, the 26 passenger and 6 crew members were aboard the aircraft. They all died.

In Syria, crashed An-26 RFL. 32 man died

It is known that the plane fell, about half a kilometer from the airfield runway.

It is necessary to study the circumstances of the crash up to the consideration of the version of the error of the pilots or a strike on the Russian plane from the ground.



It is noted that one of the versions of what happened is the possible technical malfunction of the aircraft.

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reports the formation of the commission, which should establish the causes of the collapse of the transport worker.

Data on who exactly was on board the aircraft that crashed near the Hmeymim airbase in the province of Lattakia, at this moment (16: 50 Moscow time) is not given.

It was added that there was no fire impact on An-26.
372 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +67
    6 March 2018 16: 51
    Everlasting memory!
    1. +44
      6 March 2018 16: 52
      But what kind of innovations are such constantly ((((
      1. +32
        6 March 2018 16: 54
        There is no war without sacrifices! The kingdom of heaven to all the lost.
        1. +42
          6 March 2018 17: 02
          Again “Antonov” ... We, interestingly, still cooperate with them? Well, there, spare parts, service ... Maybe someone was hired from Antonov?
          Peace be upon you, Lord, souls that have gone to You.
          1. +20
            6 March 2018 17: 04
            Quote: Monos
            Maybe someone was hired from Antonov?

            wait for the investigation, the kingdom of heaven to them
            1. +19
              6 March 2018 17: 39
              Quote: Crowe
              There is no war without sacrifices! The kingdom of heaven to all the lost.

              So then the war. Only we have too much without war
              : ((
          2. +14
            6 March 2018 17: 09
            We don’t cooperate on military topics. Maybe something is left through the Belarusians. You understand that we don’t have anything to replace the ANov park yet. The kingdom of heaven is for our soldiers ..
            Quote: Monos
            Again “Antonov” ... We, interestingly, still cooperate with them? Well, there, spare parts, service ... Maybe someone was hired from Antonov?
            Peace be upon you, Lord, souls that have gone to You.
            1. +20
              6 March 2018 17: 15
              Dima, hello hi For some reason, I recall the partisans who threw mines at tenders of locomotives, camouflaged under coal. I would check everything related to Ukraine a hundred times.
              1. +3
                6 March 2018 19: 19
                Quote: Monos
                For some reason, I recall the partisans who threw mines at tenders of locomotives, camouflaged under coal. I would check everything related to Ukraine a hundred times.

                The "black box" was found at the crash site of the An-26 aircraft in Syria. He was delivered to the base in Khmeimim, reports iz.ru correspondent Semen Pegov.
                1. +4
                  6 March 2018 19: 53
                  Victor hi Let's wait with the conclusions. It is very incomprehensible.
                  My deepest condolences to the relatives of the victims.
                  1. +3
                    6 March 2018 20: 02
                    Quote: Svarog51
                    Let's wait with the conclusions.

                    so I wrote about the same thing above, they do everything quickly, so the investigation will not be long
                    1. +2
                      6 March 2018 20: 07
                      Well, don’t tell, anything can happen. This is not a civilian airport plane crashed. They could contribute there.
                      1. +4
                        6 March 2018 20: 24
                        Quote: Svarog51
                        They could contribute there.

                        agree - never say no when
                    2. +3
                      6 March 2018 20: 26
                      Very likely. But while there is no evidence, I’ll be silent.
                  2. +8
                    6 March 2018 20: 08
                    Sergey present hi
                    Honestly, there are no words, but we must wait for the information.
                    The Kingdom of heaven..
                    1. +2
                      6 March 2018 20: 22
                      Greetings Tramp hi It is necessary to wait for information, which in vain to make assumptions, here I completely agree.
                      People feel sorry for the pain. My condolences. The competent commission will understand. Let's wait with conclusions.
                      1. +6
                        6 March 2018 20: 29
                        I welcome Sergey again. Sorry for people madly .. Levashovskys like, commander '96 release
                      2. +8
                        6 March 2018 21: 45
                        Svarog51

                        And the conclusions on Su 24 voiced? In October which ...
                    2. +1
                      6 March 2018 20: 36
                      How so? They would live and live, but here ... I don’t even know what to say.
                  3. +1
                    6 March 2018 23: 38
                    Greetings, Sergey hi
                    Quote: Svarog51
                    Let's wait with the conclusions. It is very incomprehensible.

                    I agree, of course. Just ... Paranoid I.
          3. +10
            6 March 2018 17: 12
            Quote: Monos
            Again "Antonov" ...

            it’s not a matter of “antochas,” then we will return to this topic, but now
            My condolences to family and friends. soldier
          4. +17
            6 March 2018 17: 27
            Well, the past Antonov crashed the crew (or rather Pravak) because of a lack of training. Most likely they were prepared according to another program (not using the requirements and recommendations of an international organization) - therefore they were lost. Although for Boeing / Watermelon after 757 crashed - due to the false signal "Speeding", they transferred to idle engines and fell off, the training programs were substantially rewritten. Now for Boeing / Watermelon - the standard of training is the consideration of situations with speed (going to zero, different indications, speeding), as well as these scenarios are included in the list of sudden accidents when passing the stage on the simulator.

            Here is the IAC decryption.
            Aircraft Commander: Up! Here.
            Co-pilot: Now, now.
            FAC: And you're down ..
            VP: In general, some garbage!
            PIC: No, well, as I understand it, you wanted it ... But you're on the contrary, down.
            VP: Then we will talk. So, we control everything!
            FAC: Everything, everything is fine.
            VP: Everything, speed normalized.
            Autoinformer: Compare speed, compare speed.
            VP: Op-op-op! 390!
            CF: Where is it down ?! Where are you down? Why down ?! Where?!

            Autoinformer: Compare speed, compare speed.
            VP: Yes, because n is good, 200 speed, b!
            FAC: Height! Height! Height!
            Autoinformer: Terrain ahead! Pull up! Terrain ahead!

            FAC: Top!
            Autoinformer: Terrain ahead! Pull up! Terrain ahead!
            FAC: Everything, p.


            Pravak caught the reflex - to prevent stalling, nose down, that's all. Although they went at cruising speed. According to the instructions for such a malfunction, they had to level the plane, check the cruising mode of the engines (throttle and indicators, then report to the ground, while choosing 2 independent sources of speed indicators (for example, the speed of approach to the beacon + GPS).
            1. 0
              6 March 2018 17: 36
              Quote: donavi49
              Although for a Boeing / Watermelon after crashed 757




              What case do you mean with 757? As far as I remember, a catastrophe for a similar reason occurred with Airbus flying from Rio to Paris over the Atlantic in 2008. It seems that the French for two years then searched for black boxes using submarines.
              1. +3
                6 March 2018 18: 05
                Turkish side in the Caribbean. Where wasps got into Pitot’s pipe. Therefore, at the FAC - the speed went off the scale and the signal “Overspeeding” was on, as the computer took all the information from the faulty handset by default. They reduced gas to idle and fell off.
                1. +1
                  6 March 2018 18: 32
                  Exactly, but the case that I was talking about is the same. They got into a thunderstorm and Pitot’s pipes froze. The commander was sleeping. He replaced the trainee. He lifted his nose and put the plane into a flat corkscrew. They awoke the FAC until he arrived and realized what the trainee was doing -the plane was ruined


                  EMNIP after the case in the Caribbean there was a requirement to cover the pitot tubes in the parking lots. And after Airbus, the tubes themselves were modified
                  1. +6
                    6 March 2018 19: 02
                    Quote: Town Hall

                    EMNIP after the case in the Caribbean there was a requirement to cover the pitot tubes in the parking lots

                    Air pressure receivers cover for any parking longer than a certain period. In Soviet times, it was three hours under favorable weather conditions. And they’ve been doing this for more than half a century, there hasn’t even been an Airbus. :)
              2. +5
                6 March 2018 20: 16
                Quote: Town Hall
                Airbus flying from Rio to Paris over the Atlantic in 2008

                Air France 744, it was defeated: the second pilot was sitting on the right, the second pilot was sitting there at that moment and on the left; the captain was resting, in the end he “jammed” the right one with the joystick taken over, they didn’t notice this, the captain returned, they noticed late ... The plane, the fly-by-wire sau worked perfectly, the plane crashed with a constant pitch angle.
                The French even brought in atomic submarines.
                1. +9
                  6 March 2018 20: 34
                  Pete
                  Hi!

                  I join in the condolences on the forum of our colleagues ...

                  But as I understand it, the An 26 flew there constantly, and not from Russia ... So the crew is experienced ... Apparently SURE the technical failure is irrevocable ...
                  1. +4
                    6 March 2018 20: 51
                    Gamarjoba Genatsvale, a sad day ..
                    I think -26 on the "sandbox" like a bus drove. Let's wait for the information, to be honest - the head does not accept, it cannot be, it should not.
            2. 0
              6 March 2018 17: 54
              PPC, really: I’m only going to fly by day flights !!! Why, the LDPE with GPS on a smartphone is not fate to compare ?! Have you eaten the night overboard ?! Ask smart stewardess and commander ..
              My Chinese also GLONASS catches ..
            3. +3
              6 March 2018 20: 37
              Quote: donavi49
              Pravak caught a reflex - to prevent stall

              It is unfortunate that he did not develop another reflex: to use all the information, but it was. And the airliner is instrument flights and the main reflex here is to use instruments, and they worked, there was something to work with. I think St. Peter greeted him with a good drin ... I had to learn the materiel, not open my mouth ..
          5. +3
            6 March 2018 18: 02
            Disasters have been and will be, no matter what they fly on. This is a technique plus the human factor. Earth in peace for the dead.
            1. +3
              6 March 2018 19: 00
              Quote: Alexander 3
              Disasters have been and will be, no matter what they fly on.

              Once a plane with a hockey team .., a plane with Alexandrov’s choir ... I’m afraid there were specialists too. (((
          6. +5
            6 March 2018 22: 40
            Again “Antonov” ... We, interestingly, still cooperate with them? Well, there, spare parts, service ... Maybe someone was hired from Antonov?


            What does this have to do with it ?! Now more often mediocre pilots are ruining people because instead of studying they are engaged in shooting videos with dances for Satisfaction ...

            There was the second pilot of the An-148, not only did he forget to turn on the sensor heater, he also mixed up actions in a critical situation, despite the warnings of the first pilot and equipment ...

            Tolboev said correctly in the Federal Air Transport Agency they are not training pilots, but killers ... And military pilots are no better ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. +2
                7 March 2018 00: 34
                And thirdly, you better not even stutter about military pilots, mu ... k ...


                Wow, what a talkative ... For all the pilots through the fault of which the people crashed ready to answer ?!

                Well, let's justify the crew of the An-148 crashed in the suburbs, the Tu-154 crashed near Sochi with the Turetsky choir (there were military pilots there), what else was there from the recent Sukhoi Superjet in Malaysia ... What were the reasons there ?! Is it not in the actions of the crews, but the hero ?!

                And anyway, remind me when the equipment was to blame for the crash in Russia ?! I don’t remember any of the last ...

                Well, which of us is mu .... k ?!

                I’ve seen military pilots in Chechnya, so don’t tell me how cool you are ...
                1. +5
                  7 March 2018 04: 33
                  Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                  I saw military pilots in Chechnya

                  Well? What are the complaints? Speak? Here my classmate pulled out a group of special forces from the environment, no one was injured in the turntable, the car was written off. Got something to add?
                  You are sorry, but it seems to me you are not so hot as you understand the intricacies, you fly? No, well, good luck
                  PS Military, civilian pilots act "here and now" and before asking questions: first, learn to formulate them correctly; and secondly, think whether you are running ahead of the engine.
                  'Half a second' now has the right to ask questions, but can you also answer?
                  1. +4
                    7 March 2018 09: 10
                    Of course there is, if you are interested in sharing ...

                    somehow we didn’t take the patient off the border outpost, he died, although there were always helicopters in Tushor and Khankala, there weren’t always pilots ready to take them up in the air and complete the task, often the pilots flew just drunk, they still have discipline ... Never in my 9 years of service in Chechnya have I seen anyone with appendicitis or something else being taken to the hospital by helicopter, but you know, removing a person from a mountain outpost is a big problem ... We also nearly lost a soldier , they removed it from the outpost for several hours, while sepsis started on all the streamers, the doctors would say another 30 minutes and the deceased ...

                    during the war with Georgia, one attack aircraft bombed near one of our border outposts, either so stupid that it couldn’t get through Georgia, or just a coward, dropped bombs and went home - like, look, the hero I spent all the b / c ...

                    about how the pilots speculated at exorbitant prices with cigarettes and other things when the border outposts were just set up in Chechnya and naturally there were problems with many things I don’t even want to say, it's just nasty, about how to sell water in the desert for the price of black caviar ..

                    So the pilots are no different from everyone else and I don’t need to tell me that they are all saints ...
                    No, I don’t want to be misunderstood and I say that ALL pilots are bad, no, most of them are really professionals and a hero like Roman Phillipov, but among them more and more amateurs began to come across, who fall into their places through tricks and bribes, and the result is a disaster and a lot of victims ... Only recently there was a disaster, where a civilian pilot was a technician with some kind of left access to flights, he crashed a working plane, just could not perform a second landing approach. The other board with the Lokomotiv hockey team, the Yak-42, took off with the brakes pressed, could not pick up speed, crashed into a beacon ... What is this ?! These are problems of the selection and training system for pilots !!!

                    You can tear one place for your own military branch and civil aviation as much as you like, but the fact remains that there are more and more accidents in Russia connected with airplanes and as a rule they are all due to pilot mistakes ...
                    1. +4
                      7 March 2018 12: 08
                      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                      but the fact remains that there are more and more accidents in Russia connected with airplanes and, as a rule, all of them are due to pilot mistakes ...

                      Probably there is a reasonable grain in your words, I somehow came across a different attitude to business. By and large, the Russian Federation is now dismantling the consequences of the mess of the 90s and probably a lot of time will pass before the situation changes. The army is a reflection of the State, with all its joys and problems.
                      The famous “human factor” is the cause of three quarters of flight accidents worldwide, a system error and we must look for the reasons.
                    2. +4
                      7 March 2018 19: 08
                      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                      about how the pilots speculated

                      Excuse me, but didn’t try to fill your face at a remote outpost? I think it would help
                    3. +4
                      7 March 2018 19: 11
                      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                      attack aircraft bombed near one of our border outposts

                      This is a system problem, planning, believe me. And not only Russian VKS.
                      During the first war in the Gulf, two British armored vehicles jumped forward and ran into two Amer A-10: 9 corpses. Do not believe me, the situation is the same in the second war: the Britons were not taken aback - only the wounded
                    4. +2
                      7 March 2018 19: 11
                      I’ve seen military pilots in Chechnya, so don’t tell me how cool you are.
                      Like all one measure. Driver??? Drive a car ??? How many per week dies on the road? How many are drunk? How many dashing and not adequate ??? And how many boors, thugs on the road ??? Already used to. We do not notice, do not discuss, get used to it, do not brand, do not disgrace. I do not argue there are pilots who are not very
                      with a good reputation, but they are few. Nothing stigmatizes everyone.
                2. +9
                  8 March 2018 22: 08
                  Ratmir_Ryazan

                  Well YOU gave ...
                  You mixed military and civil pilots in a heap ... Your opus on this topic could not be ignored ...
                  Perhaps you were in Chechnya, walking with a dog, and you didn’t have enough cigarettes, poor thing ... Do you know how many turntables were filled up in Chechnya? And about the drunk pilots, this is generally a masterpiece .... Isn’t it embarrassing to say that? On alcohol, it’s unrealistic not only to put a fighter, but a turntable too ...

                  Concerning the coward's dropping of bombs near the type outpost in the Georgian conflict, BREDDDDDD .....

                  With military pilots, upon receipt, no one gives a bribe, not really .... Medicine ...
                  And it would be better if I apologized on the site for my words to military pilots ///
                  And I don’t refuse my words to you, unless of course you apologize ...
              2. 0
                7 March 2018 00: 57
                “It is very difficult for me as a professional to say this, but the reason for the death of the An-148 aircraft is the completely unprepared crew. Why did this happen? It is necessary to ask Neradko in the Federal Air Transport Agency; he is responsible for this. Pilots did everything wrong, some mistakes, the so-called human factor, they killed people! Now there are no pilots - only pokes, operators - poke at the buttons, not understanding anything. Therefore, catastrophes in our country are worse than the other — Kazan, Yaroslavl and so on, ”said Magomed Tolboev.


                In your opinion, he is also wrong, too, mu..k ?!
                1. +2
                  7 March 2018 01: 06
                  Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                  “It is very difficult for me as a professional to say this, but the reason for the death of the An-148 aircraft is the completely unprepared crew. Why did this happen? It is necessary to ask Neradko in the Federal Air Transport Agency; he is responsible for this. Pilots did everything wrong, some mistakes, the so-called human factor, they killed people! Now there are no pilots - only pokes, operators - poke at the buttons, not understanding anything. Therefore, catastrophes in our country are worse than the other — Kazan, Yaroslavl and so on, ”said Magomed Tolboev.


                  In your opinion, he is also wrong, too, mu..k ?!




                  And what is this character so famous for besides the nonsense that carries on TV every time as a disaster? ... what are his competencies in piloting civilian aircraft?



                  Pilot mistakes are different. There is gagging and negligence.


                  And there are pilots mistakes, for example, because the technique is imperfect. For example, in the An-140 crash, why didn’t the electronics react to the fact that the LDPE heating toggle switch is not turned on? ... because the electronics is backward and does not insure the pilot’s error. But changing to a better one is big money. it’s easier for all pilots to write off.


                  Py.Sy.why pilots were not ready for such an emergency? ... why weren’t they prepared? ... who lets out unprepared pilots on the line? ... Who gives them “rights”?
                  1. +5
                    7 March 2018 03: 35
                    Quote: Town Hall
                    what is this character so famous for besides the nonsense that it carries on TV every time as a disaster? ... what are his competencies in piloting civilian aircraft?

                    Just applaud you town hall, removed from the tongue. With great respect for Talboev as a tester, but when he starts talking about civil aviation, well, I'm sorry. His name is in gold letters in our school, but his theses on civilians, even unpleasant to listen, babble.
                    And you ask the right questions, who would answer
                    1. 0
                      8 March 2018 22: 35
                      He speaks correctly. The Federal Air Transport Agency has long said that the transcript of negotiations in the press is fake. The superjet dispatcher pointed to the mountain, and then he himself disappeared somewhere.
                  2. +1
                    7 March 2018 09: 23
                    And what is this character so famous for besides the nonsense that carries on TV every time as a disaster? ... what are his competencies in piloting civilian aircraft?


                    Tolboev Magomed Omarovich, the reserve major major, test pilot, was also the Buran’s test cosmonaut, the hero of Russia ... That's how you put it, “character”, he’s certainly far from local “experts”, but still a man with a big experience ...
                    And he gives comments to the media, because they turn to him for them as one of the aviation professionals ...

                    Are you sure that the pilots did not burn the sensor, that the LDPE heater is not turned on ?! But I don’t ... Just in the light of recent disasters, this does not look fantastic, in Yaroslavl the Yak-42 takes off on brakes, in Indonesia, a pilot performing a demonstration flight in a mountainous area turned off the ground-warning device !!! How is that even possible ?!

                    The result is sad ... Technique is becoming more reliable and reliable, but not professionalism and frank mediocrity and stupidity of the crews neutralize all this and lead to disaster ... And the sooner the realization of this comes, the faster something will begin to change ...
                    1. +1
                      7 March 2018 10: 11
                      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                      And what is this character so famous for besides the nonsense that carries on TV every time as a disaster? ... what are his competencies in piloting civilian aircraft?


                      Tolboev Magomed Omarovich, the reserve major major, test pilot, was also the Buran’s test cosmonaut, the hero of Russia ... That's how you put it, “character”, he’s certainly far from local “experts”, but still a man with a big experience ...
                      And he gives comments to the media, because they turn to him for them as one of the aviation professionals ...

                      Are you sure that the pilots did not burn the sensor, that the LDPE heater is not turned on ?! But I don’t ... Just in the light of recent disasters, this does not look fantastic, in Yaroslavl the Yak-42 takes off on brakes, in Indonesia, a pilot performing a demonstration flight in a mountainous area turned off the ground-warning device !!! How is that even possible ?!

                      The result is sad ... Technique is becoming more reliable and reliable, but not professionalism and frank mediocrity and stupidity of the crews neutralize all this and lead to disaster ... And the sooner the realization of this comes, the faster something will begin to change ...




                      Talboev is the same Buran test pilot like you or me.


                      The Hero Star for his ability to fly on MiGs does not add to him a single gram of knowledge in the field of piloting passenger airplanes. This proves nonsense about "pilots who can only press buttons." That's just the fact that the safety of civilian aircraft consists precisely in time and in the proper investigation press all the buttons. And the "pros" neglecting this and the beginners "barrels" twist, kill themselves and passengers. Like a test pilot Supepjet.



                      He gives interviews all the time because the same “pros” work on TV as he does. This person spoke out about all the disasters over the past decades. Try to compare the nonsense of this unfortunate predictor with the real reasons published after the investigation. Shame and disgrace, but continues every time you make everyone laugh again.


                      In specific cases, what did you indicate. By Yak-42. Who is responsible for the pilot who previously flew on the Yak-40, whose brake pedal is arranged differently, was allowed to fly on the Yak-42, without appropriate retraining in violation all the rules when moving from one type of aircraft to another? He kept his feet on the pedals as it should be when taking off the Yak-40 and not the Yak-42 .. Is this the fault of the pilot or the System in which it is possible (airlines, regulatory authorities, etc.)?
                      1. +1
                        7 March 2018 10: 27
                        I don’t understand, what do you want to say that the pilots have nothing to do with it ?!

                        With the same Yak-42, well, since you can’t control it, you don’t know where its brakes turn off - well then don’t get into the cab !!! In Indonesia, the newest Sukhoi Superjet 100 crashed there, is electronics also to blame ?! Which is probably still not Russian, like so much more in it ?! To blame for what, the pilot himself disabled the warning system with the ground ?! Recently, there was only a catastrophe where the pilot simply could not cope with the second approach, it turned out that he was some kind of technician all the time, and received the pilot certificate in some kind of left-handed cantor ...

                        Since such pilots, it is naturally the fault of the system, and it is obvious that something needs to be changed ...

                        Take a look at the statistics of air crashes in Russia - they are huge and the reasons are often in the mistakes of pilots -

                      2. +4
                        7 March 2018 12: 11
                        Quote: Town Hall
                        to compare the nonsense of this sorrow of the predictor with the real reasons published after the investigation. Shame and disgrace, but each time continues to make everyone laugh again.

                        And what did he tell the Russians about the disaster over Lake Baden / Tu-154 moved the B-757 / told, in general, nonsense
                  3. 0
                    7 March 2018 11: 46
                    ..first, - * prayer * must be read .., secondly, perform it by all members of the crew (whoever is affected by this -read item). No need to blame an electrician if the instructions on the card are not always followed ((
                2. -1
                  7 March 2018 01: 18
                  This one, in general, is fabulous ... Though a Hero, and
                3. 0
                  8 March 2018 21: 11
                  Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                  “It is very difficult for me as a professional to say this, but the reason for the death of the An-148 aircraft is the completely unprepared crew. Why did this happen? It is necessary to ask Neradko in the Federal Air Transport Agency; he is responsible for this. Pilots did everything wrong, some mistakes, the so-called human factor, they killed people! Now there are no pilots - only pokes, operators - poke at the buttons, not understanding anything. Therefore, catastrophes in our country are worse than the other — Kazan, Yaroslavl and so on, ”said Magomed Tolboev.


                  In your opinion, he is also wrong, too, mu..k ?!

                  There was already a discussion of the An-148 catastrophe, I expressed everything there about the pilots of civil aviation. It discusses the disaster of the military side, and even in the area of ​​hostilities. Therefore, I do not see an analogy between the citizens and the military. An-26 is not an analogue of arbases and Boeing. If you compare by analogy, this is a Soviet car of the last century. There is nothing to operate on it, you need to steer, and hard. In the previous post I expressed everything. Yes, your statements on the Caucasus operation to force peace, also out of place. At one time, I distributed cigarettes on outposts to fighters in batches, although I myself do not smoke, and chocolate. Because for 2500-3000 after unloading the helicopter they barely drag their legs. And during the coercion operation, they fired at me; they did not like camouflage. So that.
        2. +17
          6 March 2018 17: 13
          Quote: Crowe
          There is no war without victims

          And what does the war have to do with it? Something often began to fall passenger aircraft of our Ministry of Defense .... A year ago, the Tu-154, today the An-26 .... In both cases, the external impact is denied. It remains, for the most part, the organization and provision of air transportation in the Moscow Region.
          The kingdom of heaven and the eternal memory of the lost. Condolences to the family ....
          1. +2
            6 March 2018 17: 21
            Do you think EW?
            1. +1
              6 March 2018 17: 40
              Quote: ivanec
              Do you think EW?

              It’s hard to believe anything. We must wait for the results of the investigation. Fortune-telling on coffee grounds is not a thankful task.
            2. +2
              6 March 2018 17: 46
              Quote: ivanec
              Do you think EW?

              EW in front of Hmeimim? AN26 ???
              yes, come on .....
              1. +3
                6 March 2018 19: 25
                .... and what is surprising if in Moscow planes shot down snowplows.
                1. +4
                  6 March 2018 21: 15
                  Quote: ivanec
                  .... and what is surprising if in Moscow planes shot down snowplows.

                  This means that electronic warfare against the An-26 is not serious. Even if you somehow manage to burn all of his lamps and transistors (and such an EM pulse, PMSM, will also burn REBovets equipment), then the electrician and pneumatics will not be able to burn like that. Horizons, bar altimeters and airspeed indicators will continue to work. And more for a safe landing and is not necessary, in the sense of instrumentation. Engine control there, and at all, mechanical and hydraulic.
            3. +1
              6 March 2018 18: 35
              Overload must be assumed
              1. +2
                6 March 2018 18: 57
                What an overload ?! The board did not reach 500 m. To the strip !!! sad
                The kingdom of heaven to the dead and condolences to relatives!
              2. 0
                7 March 2018 11: 59
                Quote: FalconD
                Overload must be assumed

                No need to come up with versions (especially stupid ..) - overload is dangerous during take-off .., well, not at all during landing .. when the fuel is exhausted during the flight ...
          2. +3
            6 March 2018 17: 44
            Quote: ARES623
            And what does the war have to do with it?

            If it weren’t for the war, the plane wouldn’t be there. But...
            Is this an isolated tragedy? Is it during war only battle losses?
            1. +4
              6 March 2018 17: 52
              Quote: Crowe
              If it weren’t for the war, the plane wouldn’t be there.

              Well, if it weren’t for the Wright brothers, not Mozhaisk ... ...... there wouldn’t be any air crashes, like a phenomenon.
              1. +2
                6 March 2018 18: 36
                You haven’t chosen a place for wit, it’s inappropriate here
                1. +3
                  6 March 2018 19: 32
                  Quote: FalconD
                  No place you chose

                  With you, dear, I didn’t drink vodka, and therefore keep your distance .... And my comment calls not to draw the ears of the war, as the cause of death, in those incidents where there are signs of systemic problems of the videoconferencing.
          3. +2
            6 March 2018 18: 36
            Because the planes are already old and they are all being exploited.
        3. 0
          6 March 2018 17: 25
          Strange, the whole way flew by, and such.
          Maybe when landing, instrumentation sensors misled the pilots ..
          1. +3
            6 March 2018 18: 38
            These pilots in a pack of Belomor can fly ... what devices do they have in front of the lane?
        4. +6
          6 March 2018 19: 57
          Quote: Crowe
          There is no war without sacrifices! The kingdom of heaven to all the lost.

          So here it is still not clear war is again negligence .. At least in civil aviation we have a full tryndets .. so many planes fall only with us, if in three years in the world 2 planes fall, then we have 10 .. And neither of which does not change .. All the rules .. Everything in its place ..
          1. +1
            6 March 2018 20: 32
            Without politics, no matter how? PEOPLE are dead! Well, what kind of people are you? Planes are falling all over the world, and you all want to tie them to something. Vladimir, well, not everything is so measured. hi
            1. +7
              6 March 2018 20: 54
              Quote: Svarog51
              Without politics, no matter how? PEOPLE are dead! Well, what kind of people are you? Planes are falling all over the world, and you all want to tie them to something. Vladimir, well, not everything is so measured. hi

              Yes, what kind of politics is it ... that's it people are dying .. and who is responsible? I think from condolences it will not become much easier who, due to negligence and sloppiness, loses loved ones ..
      2. +5
        6 March 2018 16: 54
        MO seems to have called a preliminary cause a technical malfunction.
        1. +30
          6 March 2018 17: 08
          Throw what kind of malfunction they are. "The plane took off. Flew the entire route and nothing, but as soon as it was in ideal conditions for an attack from the ground. (Restrictions on maneuver, altitude, speed) -so immediately those malfunction.
          1. +18
            6 March 2018 17: 13
            Quote: Seeker
            Throw what kind of malfunction they are. "The plane took off. Flew the entire route and nothing, but as soon as it was in ideal conditions for an attack from the ground. (Restrictions on maneuver, altitude, speed) -so immediately those malfunction.

            You were there and you saw, maybe better, more accurate conclusions will wait ah? And how something will happen a bunch of experts from sofas connects and conspiracy theorists. The dead is eternal memory. Mourn
          2. +6
            6 March 2018 17: 19
            17:14 Telegram channel Mash reports that this An-26 was assigned to the 6th VKS army, was seconded to Syria and was based at the Khmeimim airfield.
            so he didn’t fly half the planet
            1. +8
              6 March 2018 17: 51
              Eternal memory and eternal peace! I feel sorry for my relatives ... I would have had the strength to survive such a tragedy ....
              1. +5
                6 March 2018 18: 11
                18:09 Again, unofficial data. Telegram channel WarGonzo reports that eyewitnesses of the crash of the plane got in touch. According to them, during the landing of the An-26, it was very tilted, "sat almost sideways."
                18:05 In the publics of various terrorist groups operating in Syria - silence. No one claimed responsibility for the attack on the aircraft, which indirectly confirms the main version: the An-26 was not shot down.
          3. +4
            6 March 2018 17: 21
            17:20 According to Mash, the An-26 took off from the Kvayres airfield in the suburbs of Aleppo, after which it made two intermediate landings and headed for Khmeimim.
          4. +3
            6 March 2018 17: 24
            Before Khmeimim, he made two intermediate landings (according to forumavia.ru). Waited in the bushes? This is not a scheduled passenger liner. Most likely the malfunction of the materiel or wind shear or microburst, and the pilots did not have enough time, altitude and speed to get out of the situation on the glide path.
            1. +2
              6 March 2018 20: 26
              Most likely the malfunction of the materiel or the shear of the wind or microburst, and on the glide path the pilots did not have enough time, altitude and speed to get out of the situation

              The approach to Khmeimim is built on a steep glide path, and at a speed slightly higher than on a standard glide path. The plane flew a third of Syria. And events from Syria are filtered. What happened at the intermediate landings and along the route we do not know. If we analyze the case of the Su-25, then the command of the group did not assume that the drying could be attacked from the ground. An-26 reliable aircraft. We are waiting for the officials to say. But I will say half the truth.
              1. 0
                6 March 2018 21: 09
                Quote: Letun_64
                The approach to Khmeimim is built on a steep glide path, and at a speed slightly higher than on a standard glide path.

                I am not special in this area, but explain if this anti-aircraft maneuver, in fact diving from a great height with large overloads at the exit, could have caused a catastrophe, given the fatigue of aircraft structures that are already over 30?
                1. +2
                  6 March 2018 22: 07
                  This plane, which would collapse in the air, must be subjected to an overload value of 4G for a long time. Even in the process of various kinds of extreme approaches, such an overload does not occur. Well, about the cases of the destruction of the aircraft in the air due to structural defects or design fatigue, I have not heard anything since the time of the catastrophes with the An-10 and Lockheed Electra. And about An-12 and An-26, they said: "Glory to the Soviet steelworkers"
                  1. 0
                    6 March 2018 22: 46
                    Quote: Cook
                    we said: "Glory to the Soviet steelworkers"

                    No doubt, the Soviet - glory. But if I’m not mistaken, the fatigue is characterized by the fact that the load necessary for the destruction of metal is greatly reduced in the presence of a cyclic load, and if it is not scary for a brand new aircraft and 4G, then for a 40-year-old veteran 1G can be fatal. Although I repeat, I do not insist, just a version.
                    1. 0
                      7 March 2018 12: 12
                      Allow me to explain a little ..: ..- that after a certain flying hours the aircraft (LA) passes the regulations in the fuel and energy sector .., where with an instrument, so special .. the entire aircraft body rings for the presence of microcracks. So dear ones, you can be calm on this side.
          5. 0
            6 March 2018 17: 34
            Quote: Seeker
            Throw what kind of malfunction they are. "The plane took off. Flew the entire route and nothing, but as soon as it was in ideal conditions for an attack from the ground. (Restrictions on maneuver, altitude, speed) -so immediately those malfunction.

            Here, a sharp change in conditions, different air temperatures (near the sea) and confusion in altitude could play.
          6. +1
            6 March 2018 17: 47
            Quote: Seeker
            Throw what kind of malfunction they are. "The plane took off. Flew the entire route and nothing, but as soon as it was in ideal conditions for an attack from the ground. (Restrictions on maneuver, altitude, speed) -so immediately those malfunction.

            Most accidents occur on takeoff and landing.
          7. +1
            6 March 2018 18: 39
            Do not dust, the bulk of accidents on takeoff and landing
          8. The comment was deleted.
          9. +1
            6 March 2018 19: 37
            Quote: Seeker
            Throw what kind of malfunction they are. "The plane took off. Flew the entire route and nothing, but as soon as it was in ideal conditions for an attack from the ground. (Restrictions on maneuver, altitude, speed) -so immediately those malfunction.


            That's right. Something is wrong here. 500 m to the strip is very low and the speed is low. If the engines, then why not planned and did not sit on the ground. So sharply fell and the fuel exploded. tanks on the ground ... Let's see what the MO says.
        2. +4
          6 March 2018 17: 10
          "According to the report, there was no fire on the plane," the RF Defense Ministry added. https://www.unian.net/world/10032848-tehnicheskay
          a-neispravnost-poyavilis-podrobnosti-krusheniya-r
          ossiyskogo-an-26-v-sirii.html
          Preliminary cause of the disaster
          According to preliminary information, the cause of the disaster could be a technical malfunction. The Ministry of Defense noted that, "according to the report, there was no fire on the plane." https://ria.ru/syria/20180306/1515873899.html
        3. +8
          6 March 2018 17: 53
          Quote: Thrall
          MO seems to have called a preliminary cause a technical malfunction.

          Now will begin the "fantasies of zhurnalyug and bloggers," the joyous bleating of hohloman.
          An-26 transporter, crashed in Syria, was assigned to the 6th Army of the Russian Air Force, based in Khmeimim.

          The plane was based at a Syrian airfield as seconded to Syria, according to the Mash Telegram channel.

          It is also noted that Major Smirnov was at the helm of the aircraft, and several civilians were on board. A plane took off from the Quiires airfield in the suburbs of Aleppo, made two intermediate landings and headed for Hmeimim.

          https://vz.ru/news/2018/3/6/911365.html
          We can only wait for reliable info from the MO! hi
          1. +5
            6 March 2018 18: 43
            We can only wait for reliable info from the MO


            will you wait ...? especially reliable
            1. +5
              6 March 2018 20: 44
              Quote: FalconD
              We can only wait for reliable info from the MO


              will you wait ...? especially reliable

              It all depends on what mission he performed, and the composition of passengers on board. The simplest thing for MO is a technical malfunction.) IMHO) hi
      3. 0
        6 March 2018 17: 02
        Quote: Dimontius
        what kind of innovations are such


        You would have such "obsessions!" !! The most catastrophe ... The kingdom of heaven is innocently murdered!
        1. +3
          6 March 2018 17: 08
          Quote: Fornit
          Quote: Dimontius
          what kind of innovations are such


          You would have such "obsessions!" !! The most catastrophe ... The kingdom of heaven is innocently murdered!

          No need to glow and cling to the words, this will not make it easier for the family !!!!!! Soul Cries and Heart Hurts !!!!! Everything is very BAD
      4. +1
        6 March 2018 18: 10
        It’s just that the plane was 153 years old and this is AN. Or send techies to Magadan (if the reason is really technical). We are ruining too many of our people just like that. There, combat losses were less than killed in two passenger flights ... and probably the chief of transport aviation must retire for a long time, people will be more whole. There are no words. Everlasting memory.
        1. 0
          6 March 2018 18: 45
          retiree chief of transport aviation

          First, a plane
      5. The comment was deleted.
        1. +5
          6 March 2018 20: 28
          Quote: ankon
          It is necessary to change the power in the elections of March 18, 2018, to vote for other people. It is a pity that Russian people do not always think about

          Listen, dear people, you would have turned off with elections and campaigning on another branch, here PEOPLE Died, and not campaigning for one or the other. negative
        2. +3
          6 March 2018 20: 44
          You do not like Russia. And as a FORMER military, do not honor the SUPREME COMMANDER. You just need to throw it on the fan, apparently "suffered" during the service from the "excess of zeal." Otherwise, where is such hatred?
        3. +1
          6 March 2018 20: 52
          Quote: ankon
          Friends, hello!
          This is not an obsession, but a mess created in our army by Putin’s oligarchs V.V. and his surroundings. You look, how much bragging Putin issued, addressing the message to the Federal Assembly. as the media write, the speech lasted two hours, during which time the president talked about pensions, the economy and new weapons. Did you notice which planes our pilots fly on? On the old, still made in the USSR! The downed SU-25, an old reliable attack aircraft, but did not have modern missile defense! Sent to the war in a simplified form (no money, but you hold on). For the 18 years of the reign of Mr. President, new attack aircraft have not been built! The crashed AN-26 aircraft was produced in the Soviet Union, it is also many years old. According to official data (voiced during the debate by Boldyrev Yu.Yu., proxy of Grudinin Pavel), during the reign of Putin, 750 billion US dollars were withdrawn from the country. How much good can be done for the people of Russia with these huge funds? But today greedy people in power, not sparing the people, which leads us into the abyss. It is necessary to change the power in the elections of March 18, 2018, to vote for other people. It is a pity that Russian people do not always think about the causes of the disasters. The kingdom of heaven is lost. Sincerely, Anatoly Kon .. SPb.

          Your arguments are correct, but you have chosen the wrong branch.
          Wrong place for sracha.
      6. +2
        6 March 2018 19: 36
        Rest in peace.
        But it’s strange. There was no investigation, and the Moscow Region immediately emphasized the absence of fire damage.
      7. 0
        6 March 2018 20: 25
        OWNERS
      8. 0
        7 March 2018 05: 14
        Remember such "random" obsessions happened during the Perestroika period ... And look at the statistics of fires for the last year and the previous one ... Add the number of false calls about mining and the oil painting will develop instantly. If the planes fall ... someone needs it.
    2. +10
      6 March 2018 16: 59
      Everlasting memory! Again, like passenger An.
      1. +3
        6 March 2018 17: 03
        Quote: Sith Lord
        Everlasting memory!

        ...............................................
      2. +3
        6 March 2018 17: 07
        Vladyka, hello !!! hi
        There are simply no words ... We are just starting to move away from one emergency ... And now, on you .. sad Eternal memory ... Earth rest in peace ...
        What kind of explosion, in Maryinka ??
    3. +4
      6 March 2018 17: 08
      It is unlikely that it will be possible to blame here on gouging. All the same, Moscow Region is not civil aviation with stripper cadets.
    4. +9
      6 March 2018 17: 10
      The kingdom of heaven to the lost! Condolences to family and friends.
    5. +13
      6 March 2018 17: 36
      Losses of the military aviation of the Russian Federation in 2017:
      MiG – 31 - 1
      MiG – 29kub - 1
      An – 26 - 1
      Tu – 22M3 - 1
      Yak – 130 - 1
      Su – 24M - 1
      Only 6 units.

      Losses of the U.S. Military Aviation in 2017:
      T – 38 - 1
      T – 45 - 2
      A – 29 - 1
      U – 28 - 1
      F – 16 - 3
      F – 5 - 1
      Su – 27 - 1
      F – 18 - 1
      A – 10 - 2
      V – 22 - 3
      UH – 60 - 6
      CH – 3 - 2
      MH – 47 - 1
      C – 130 - 1
      C – 2 - 1
      UAV - 4
      Only 31 units. (including 4 strike UAVs)
      1. +10
        6 March 2018 17: 46
        And are the clock data attached to these numbers? They stopuds fly more often, therefore they fight more often.
        1. +5
          6 March 2018 18: 15
          Below answered, already two years, each unit is smaller than ours. But due to the larger number of units than ours, the total number of hours is greater.
          1. +1
            6 March 2018 19: 10
            The Russian Ministry of Defense confirmed that the Mi-06.10.2017 helicopter was lost in Hama on 28/XNUMX/XNUMX. Somewhat earlier, militants said they shot down a Russian helicopter
            According to the Ministry of Defense, the car made a hard landing for technical reasons. The crew survived and was evacuated.


            On December 31, 2017, the Mi-24 combat helicopter of the Russian Aerospace Forces crashed 15 km from the Ham airport in Syria. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, both pilots died as a result of a hard landing. The helicopter's flight technician was injured and was quickly evacuated by a search and rescue team to the Khmeimim airfield, where he received the necessary medical assistance. The Russian military department reported that the cause of the disaster was a technical malfunction, “there was no fire impact on the Mi-24


            2 Yak-130 in 1 day in June, landing on the "belly". With them what?
            1. +3
              6 March 2018 19: 20
              In the internet, all these breakdowns are. Look and Yak-130
              1. +2
                6 March 2018 19: 33
                There are no helicopters in your lists. And the Americans have counted. The list is unreliable
                1. 0
                  6 March 2018 20: 37
                  Invalid or incomplete?
                  1. +1
                    6 March 2018 21: 09
                    When comparative statistics are incomplete, they are unreliable
                    1. +1
                      6 March 2018 21: 24
                      Quote: Town Hall
                      When comparative statistics are incomplete, they are unreliable


                      If you are unable to subtract addition, simple arithmetic functions ... then this is generally ... well, you understand
      2. +1
        6 March 2018 17: 48
        Rather, see% of the total. So the Americans and planes / helicopters / drones will have more.
        1. +4
          6 March 2018 18: 13
          True, but last year, raid was reduced by an average of 200 hours per unit.
      3. +3
        6 March 2018 18: 17
        So they fly 10 times more hours. If we had flown so much, it’s scary to think what it would be.
        1. +5
          6 March 2018 19: 04
          Quote: Kent0001
          So they fly 10 times more hours. If we had flown so much, it’s scary to think what it would be.

          It would be better than now. The more work (if without fanaticism, of course), the higher the training of personnel.
      4. 0
        6 March 2018 18: 29
        Vladyka, how did the Merikos manage to lose Dry 27?
        1. +6
          6 March 2018 18: 35
          So even VO published this news. Well, they are buying Soviet planes to hone training with a possible enemy. In my opinion, purchased from Ukraine.
      5. +2
        6 March 2018 18: 47
        This is what achievement of domestic aviation do you want to boast ??? Not appropriate! Or are you happy when your neighbor’s cow died more ???
      6. The comment was deleted.
        1. +2
          6 March 2018 18: 55
          Quote: GSVG 86-88
          SU-33 with Kuzi is still a plus.



          This statistic is not credible
      7. +1
        6 March 2018 18: 51
        Another Su-33 with Kuzi.
      8. +3
        6 March 2018 18: 54
        In the RF Armed Forces there were no helicopter losses in 2017?
      9. +1
        6 March 2018 19: 17
        Only 6 units.
        And in Homs, a drone shot down
      10. +1
        6 March 2018 19: 57
        It’s Putin's fault that Americans are more likely to fall
      11. 0
        6 March 2018 20: 54
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Losses of the military aviation of the Russian Federation in 2017:
        MiG – 31 - 1
        MiG – 29kub - 1
        An – 26 - 1
        Tu – 22M3 - 1
        Yak – 130 - 1
        Su – 24M - 1
        Only 6 units.

        Losses of the U.S. Military Aviation in 2017:
        T – 38 - 1
        T – 45 - 2
        A – 29 - 1
        U – 28 - 1
        F – 16 - 3
        F – 5 - 1
        Su – 27 - 1
        F – 18 - 1
        A – 10 - 2
        V – 22 - 3
        UH – 60 - 6
        CH – 3 - 2
        MH – 47 - 1
        C – 130 - 1
        C – 2 - 1
        UAV - 4
        Only 31 units. (including 4 strike UAVs)

        And as a percentage of the amount, these statistics will be more accurate.
      12. 0
        6 March 2018 22: 18
        The comparison is not correct. Different weight categories. If we compare the non-combat losses of military aircraft of the times of the USSR and the USA per year, then they are approximately the same. Our losses per year, in terms of the number of aircraft and drugs, are approximately an air regiment.
    6. +11
      6 March 2018 17: 39
      Russia took the lead in the number of air crashes

      The largest catastrophes of Russian passenger aircraft No. Airplane Year and crash site Number of fatalities Number of survivors 1 Airbus A310-324 2006, Irkutsk airport (outside the runway) 125 people 78 people 2 Tu-154M 2006, in Ukraine , near Donetsk 170 people - 3 Boeing 737-505 2008, the border of the Sverdlovsk and Industrial regions of Perm 88 people - 4 Boeing 737-500 2013, Kazan International Airport 50 people - 5 Airbus A321-231 2015, Sinai Peninsula 224 people - - Read more on FB.ru: http://fb.ru/article/228004/statistika-krusheniy-
      samoletov-v-rossii-za-let


      - this is despite the fact that Russia is by no means in the first places in the number of passenger traffic. That is, our passenger planes fly less often, they fight more often. And there are such “investigations” when in 154, with our military and Aleksandrov’s ensemble, it fell apart over Black by the sea, but the investigation found out the pilot’s errors, it just causes not just bewilderment, but already other feelings.
      Somehow too often we began to fall. It is necessary to change something and start from above.
      1. +1
        6 March 2018 17: 42
        maybe it's time to start dropping American planes?
        1. +3
          6 March 2018 18: 50
          For such comments you need to trim! Keep quiet
          1. +1
            6 March 2018 20: 58
            Quote: FalconD
            For such comments you need to trim! Keep quiet


            are you going to level your aunt?
      2. +12
        6 March 2018 17: 50
        The weather here today is terrible, there is a strong hot wind from the desert (hamsin) with sand blowing no visibility, so there could be a micro rush of the downward flow, And you do not have to blame the equipment or the crew immediately. My condolences.
        1. +6
          6 March 2018 18: 22
          Quote: Ncplc
          The weather here is terrible today, a strong hot wind blows from the desert (hamsin) with sand, there is no visibility, so there could be a micro gust of a downward flow

          This phenomenon is quite rare. But the wind shear could well arrange this. I don’t know how at the air base, but in Latakia there was the following:
          METAR: OSLK 061400Z 16012G25KT

          Gusts of wind with a double drop in speed (from 12 knots to 25) is pretty much up to a fig. And if there’s another shift in height ...
        2. 0
          6 March 2018 23: 20
          Weather conditions could not be the cause of the crash of the An-26 military transport aircraft at the Khmeimim airfield, since they were simple, a source in the Russian Defense Ministry said.
          “There are no cyclones there today, in the morning there were simple weather conditions,” RIA Novosti reports his words.
      3. The comment was deleted.
        1. +2
          6 March 2018 20: 09
          And 29000 enterprises were built, and the fact that our aircraft are almost never released, thank the USSR and the 90th - they did not create competitive products - until MC 21, Tu 154 and Tu 134 - this is ancient rubbish.
          1. 0
            6 March 2018 21: 55
            Yes, of course, the USSR needs to be thanked for the fact that we generally have aircraft construction. But at the expense of the 90s ... there was power, the direct successor of which is now existing. And the power center was not built in the 90s, and today's authorities erected a sign of gratitude to their predecessors
  2. +3
    6 March 2018 16: 51
    Hmm, no words
  3. +2
    6 March 2018 16: 53
    the security zone needs to be expanded. because they promised ...
  4. +8
    6 March 2018 16: 53
    Sorry for the people, they rest in peace. And unfortunately, Russophobes are now activating and will use this catastrophe for their own purposes.
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 18: 19
      Yes, we are the army of Russophobes-they will always be. We simply ruin people - that’s the problem, and this is a given.
  5. +3
    6 March 2018 16: 53
    What a news... belay
    ... what the hell ... I hope the black boxes clarify the situation. what
  6. BAI
    +2
    6 March 2018 16: 53
    How is this not in time! (The death of people is always not in time, but here is the fact of the event ...).
    1. Don
      +2
      6 March 2018 18: 24
      Quote: BAI
      How is this not in time! (The death of people is always not in time, but here is the fact of the event ...).

      Strange statement. What if not for the elections, then let them fall at least every day? Pressure on the Russian Federation will only increase, even after the election. In the light of recent statements by the president, he called himself a load - climb into the back. But is the government itself ready for this? I have big doubts here.
    2. 0
      6 March 2018 18: 52
      And when on time ??? Calm down !!!
  7. +8
    6 March 2018 16: 54
    the eternal memory of the dead. land them rest in peace recourse
  8. +10
    6 March 2018 16: 54
    32 people - This is pi ...... I have no words. Everlasting memory!!!!!
  9. +3
    6 March 2018 16: 54
    Eternal memory .. Condolences to the family ...
  10. +10
    6 March 2018 16: 55
    Condolences to the families of the dead! We will be silent for a while, then everything will be clarified.
  11. +3
    6 March 2018 16: 55
    Probably shot down.
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 17: 24
      Quote: Bosch
      Probably shot down.
      Laser probably technology .... what
      Everlasting memory !
  12. +7
    6 March 2018 16: 55
    The kingdom of heaven is lost. But something tells me that we won’t know the truth.
  13. +8
    6 March 2018 16: 55
    P..dets some !!!
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 18: 20
      the same garbage, just no words ......
  14. +7
    6 March 2018 16: 56
    yes, trouble .... the earth rest in peace .... well, are these anthos pouring like pears? is it time to abandon them? ... it was confirmed that there was no “fire impact on the plane” .. that means a technical malfunction
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 16: 58
      What to change then? Not Soviet times, when they handed over 50 transporters a year. IL-112 will appear in the army in 5 years, and then they will be handed in 3-4 per year.
      1. +3
        6 March 2018 17: 03
        it’s clear that so far there’s nothing to replace this junk ... where did he fly from interesting?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      6 March 2018 17: 03
      In addition to fire, there are other types of exposure. For example, a laser in the eyes, etc. It is hard to believe in a technical malfunction.
      1. +3
        6 March 2018 17: 05
        hardly
        Quote: seal78
        For example, a laser in the eyes, etc.

        he didn’t hold out a bit, and after the attack on the base the security measures were strengthened as well as the defense radius
        1. +3
          6 March 2018 17: 08
          Well, the plane is not a bicycle, it flies fast. The impact could be for 3-4 kilometers, and fell already at 500 meters.
          1. +2
            6 March 2018 17: 12
            I think that it’s just a technical failure ... there is such a term "metal fatigue" - everything seems to be tight, but I stuck it with my finger, the dust remained ... and here are imported spare parts, partial service is possible ...
            Quote: Monos
            Maybe someone was hired from Antonov?
            1. +1
              6 March 2018 17: 13
              Maybe so, I do not insist on my version, I just consider it as an option.
              1. 0
                6 March 2018 20: 12
                You still say that the meteorite hit the plane during landing.
      2. +1
        6 March 2018 18: 55
        Nonsense do not say
    4. +1
      6 March 2018 17: 04
      Rest in peace...
      Regrettably, no one is safe from technical malfunctions and human errors ...
    5. +2
      6 March 2018 17: 11
      Quote: assa67
      ..that these antoshka are strewed like pears?

      For half a century, I suppose.
      1. +3
        6 March 2018 17: 18
        Sergei hi ... besides, probably .... another confirmation of the urgent need to acquire their own machines of this class .... moreover, a sad confirmation
  15. +1
    6 March 2018 16: 56
    Bad news. Again, the planes ceased to hold in the sky.
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 17: 13
      Quote: Yrec
      Bad news. Again, the planes ceased to hold in the sky.

      Sucks, for some reason, only ours are in the air ... The trend, however?
      But to me, it still seems that he did not fall. Dropped it. Is it really impossible to put things in order along the flight path? Not so wide a "strip" turns out ...
      1. +1
        6 March 2018 17: 30
        Quote: Fast_mutant
        Quote: Yrec
        Bad news. Again, the planes ceased to hold in the sky.
        But to me, it still seems that he did not fall. Dropped it.

        It’s clear that they dropped it ... it’s unlikely that the lifting force rebelled and ceased to act on the wing of the aircraft of their own free will ...
  16. +3
    6 March 2018 16: 57
    What kind of misfortune is this, only the good mood was here on you too.
    "The cause of the crash, according to preliminary information, could be a technical malfunction," the military department said. “According to the report, there was no fire on the plane,” the RF Ministry of Defense added.
    1. +4
      6 March 2018 17: 07
      Here is the same. But the mood towards the evening can also change, but the dead will not return.
  17. +12
    6 March 2018 16: 58
    Condolences to relatives and friends, the kingdom of heaven.
    What can I say, "Afghan sunset", high overload for the old man An-26 .. the airfield is small and not adapted for such intensive flights and traffic. There are mountains and a narrow strip near the coast. Eh .. how would you dissociate yourself from the Ukrainian segment of the Internet? ((
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 20: 13
      These An 26 aircraft are long-flying junk.
      1. +10
        6 March 2018 21: 06
        Vadim237

        Two years ago he was honored to fly to An 26, the old Rostov board.
        We flew all day, with two landings ... Talked with the commander, a very reliable plane ...
        So shut your pzhl your mouth ....
        1. 0
          7 March 2018 01: 31
          Very reliable - how many years has it been flying? Reliable for the time being, for the time being - as today, the guys also believed in its reliability - the most sad result.
  18. +1
    6 March 2018 16: 58
    No transport workers should fly until March 18, supplies only with water
  19. +4
    6 March 2018 17: 00
    The Kingdom of heaven!
  20. +4
    6 March 2018 17: 00
    That's the news, it's a pity. mourn
  21. +6
    6 March 2018 17: 01
    Hohlomrazi already jumping?
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 17: 12
      Quote: seal78
      Hohlomrazi already jumping?

      Undoubtedly.
    2. +8
      6 March 2018 18: 14
      Quote: seal78
      Hohlomrazi already jumping?

      Once we rode on their wreckage, now it's their turn to ride on our ... Vile is all.
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 18: 41
        Once we rode on their wreckage
        Who are you?
        1. +1
          6 March 2018 22: 34
          Quote: seal78
          Who are you?

          Open the VO for 14 and 15 years and read the comments about the downed ukrosamoloty and helicopters, you can even make a list of commentators
    3. +1
      6 March 2018 18: 57
      What kind of comment is this here ??? Uma Chamber
  22. +16
    6 March 2018 17: 01
    Yes trouble
    Rest in peace
  23. +27
    6 March 2018 17: 03
    My deepest condolences to the families of the victims and to all citizens of the Russian Federation. Everlasting memory.
    1. +27
      6 March 2018 17: 10
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      My deepest condolences to the families of the victims and to all citizens of the Russian Federation. Everlasting memory.

      join in

      The weather is bad today. Strong winds. Dust in the air ...
      1. +11
        6 March 2018 17: 38
        Quote: professor
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        My deepest condolences to the families of the victims and to all citizens of the Russian Federation. Everlasting memory.

        join in

        The weather is bad today. Strong winds. Dust in the air ...

        For sure. In the north, impenetrable dust.

        Blessed be their memory ...
        1. ADT
          +3
          6 March 2018 19: 39
          Join.
  24. +3
    6 March 2018 17: 04
    Eternal memory .. Mourn.
  25. +3
    6 March 2018 17: 05
    Oh oh oh(((

    I can’t even find the words. Eternal memory of the dead, to identify and punish the perpetrators.
  26. 0
    6 March 2018 17: 05
    condolences to family and friends.
  27. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 05
    Yes, what is going on with us, something like it's time to take a closer look at the entire BTA flight support system, something is wrong there.
  28. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 06
    Suspiciously, a crash distance of 500 m to the strip. Very similar to a standard MANPADS shot at maximum range. Let's see the results of the investigation.
  29. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 06
    Downed scum.
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 18: 58
      Have you checked it?
      1. 0
        7 March 2018 09: 11
        There was a video where the churkobesy screaming alah-akbar, shooting the moment when something flashed on the plane. Therefore, I think that they knocked out.
  30. +4
    6 March 2018 17: 08
    some shizdets ... the junk begins to crumble. And if you do not take measures, it will be even worse ... Bravure statements about plans, especially do not correct the situation. In the light of recent events, this is a serious blow to the reputation of both the Russian Federation and the RF Armed Forces and the president too. And you have to do something for a long time ..
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 17: 33
      Quote: AwaZ
      some shizdets ... the junk begins to crumble.

      Do you think it collapsed into the air because it rusted through? .. Then the technicians must be shot, according to the law of wartime, for sabotage .. is it possible to let out rusty planes on a flight ????
      1. +1
        6 March 2018 17: 56
        Quote: Semen1972
        Do you think it collapsed into the air because it rusted through? .. Then the technicians must be shot, according to the law of wartime, for sabotage .. is it possible to let out rusty planes on a flight ????

        How bloodthirsty you are, you would have to shoot everything. On the plane there are places where it is impossible to get close without dismantling it. I remember how we discovered the corrosion of the Tu-95 center section only when they were cut into metal.
        1. +1
          6 March 2018 18: 18
          Quote: Piramidon
          How bloodthirsty you are, you would have to shoot everything.

          Stalin's upbringing ... in the 71st, the brand-new An-10 fell apart, and a year later another one, due to design flaws, apparently, Antonov had to be shot then.
          1. +4
            6 March 2018 19: 55
            Quote: verner1967
            The An-10 fell apart, and after another year, due to design flaws, apparently, Antonov needed to be shot even then.

            Antonov - the best aircraft designer of the post-war Union; shares this pedestal with Ilyushin. An-10s fell not due to design flaws, but because of the wrong material (this is not a design). Despite the fact that the twin sister of the An-10th flies so far. Yes, with overlays on the side members, but it flies. If it weren’t for the IL-18th at that time, the An-10 would still fly. And the wings fell off and the state’s counterparts An-10 / Il-18.
            1. 0
              7 March 2018 17: 40
              Quote: Avis-bis
              but because of the wrong material

              But isn’t this the designer calculating the loads? In conclusion, it was written "design flaws" or something like that.
              1. +4
                7 March 2018 17: 56
                Quote: verner1967
                Quote: Avis-bis
                but because of the wrong material

                But isn’t this the designer calculating the loads?

                Yes and no. But no more. An aircraft designer cannot be an absolute specialist in everything. There are specialized research institutes, one of which is developing new alloys. And this research institute gives out some characteristics of this alloy. Aircraft designer, not being a metallurgist and chemist, may not believe them (and use proven alloys), may believe (and use a new duralumin).
                Well, and then it may turn out that the new alloy under specific conditions (which could very well be simulated by metallurgists) of the aircraft gives fatigue cracks faster than everyone expected. This happened with the An-10. He, like any civilian aircraft, was operated very intensively, unlike his military brother An-12, who flew relatively rarely. Here is the tragic fate of those two (EMNIP) An-10s and helped the An-12s stay in the sky - the spars strengthened, they replaced something and the plane still flies.
                If the An-10th had no full analogue in the person of the Il-18th, the An-10 would still fly.
                1. 0
                  7 March 2018 18: 01
                  Quote: Avis-bis
                  An aircraft designer cannot be an absolute specialist in everything.

                  Absolute not, but then he is general.
                  1. +4
                    7 March 2018 18: 06
                    Quote: verner1967

                    Absolute not, but then he is general.

                    And, nevertheless ... Of course, he is the first to be honored and he is also “extreme” during dismantling. He is responsible for everything. But there are limits to the applicability of this principle.
                    1. 0
                      7 March 2018 18: 35
                      Quote: Avis-bis
                      And yet...

                      listen, don’t turn around like a pan, the metal could not withstand the calculated overloads “early tired” is a design flaw. Fact! And put on this point. If you want to argue, then questions to the state commission.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            7 March 2018 11: 41
            Quote: verner1967
            Quote: Piramidon
            How bloodthirsty you are, you would have to shoot everything.

            Stalin's upbringing ... Antonov still had to be shot.

            It can be seen that about education is very doubtful, and the conclusion is not worthy of the Air Force officer.
            1. 0
              7 March 2018 18: 33
              Quote: shura7782
              and the conclusion is not worthy of an Air Force officer.

              yeah, with sarcasm you have difficulties. I'm just not a supporter of executions, like some commies on the site.
              1. 0
                7 March 2018 23: 08
                Quote: verner1967
                Quote: shura7782
                and the conclusion is not worthy of an Air Force officer.

                yeah, with sarcasm you have difficulties. I'm just not a supporter of executions, like some commies on the site.

                I will know that this is such sarcasm.
                Are you by any chance not from Chelyabinsk?
      2. +1
        6 March 2018 18: 11
        These planes are real junk. Watching them horribly. Back in the late 80s, I somehow had the opportunity to navigate on ANE with a ramp. Everything hangs there, blowing from all the cracks. And this was still under the USSR. What aircraft could turn into at the present time - I’m even afraid to imagine. Here stopudovo and gagging of technicians and "new approaches" to repair and maintenance by the leadership and the lack of the ability for pilots to refuse to fly on this trash. As a result of the tragedy And I'm afraid that this is only the first call. If you do nothing, it will continue further with even greater shame.
        1. 0
          7 March 2018 12: 00
          Quote: AwaZ
          Here stopudovo and gagging of technicians and "new approaches" to repair and maintenance by the leadership and the lack of the ability for pilots to refuse to fly on this trash.

          Everything is beautifully written, but it’s possible that the plane crashes because it’s old ... I can count on the fingers of one hand .. if I try hard. The fact that, flying in an A320 plane, many say that it’s junk .. the table is loose, I read this 1000 times. EVERY aircraft passes THAT according to the flight hours and replacement is often carried out by entire units and structural elements. Why are you holding Pilots for WHAT kind of money are they ready to Die, knowing that they are flying in an unprepared aircraft ???? And the second question .. HOW MANY technicians have been planted lately from the Razdolbaisky approach to repair ???? But the investigations show that it is the pilots who often bring down planes .. The last Saratov AN showed a lot.
  31. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 08
    Quote: Crowe
    There is no war without sacrifices! The kingdom of heaven to all the lost.

    Combat losses are one thing, which, incidentally, can also be minimized, but another is due to sloppiness, low professional training and our chance.
  32. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 08
    Eternal memory to the fallen. We grieve with relatives
  33. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 09
    God rest ...
  34. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 09
    How tired of reading such news ... sad rest in peace!!!
  35. +5
    6 March 2018 17: 11
    Condolences to family and friends.
    In 2016, there were 6 An-26 incidents, of which 2 were disasters. In 2017 - 5, disasters - 3. In 2018 - so far one. Maybe it's time to write it off?
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 17: 19
      Why fly then? Do not even talk about IL-112. To serial deliveries as to China on foot.
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 17: 42
        Quote: Bronevick
        Why fly then?

        On the IL-76 ..
        1. +1
          6 March 2018 17: 49
          Drive IL-76 to transport 26 people? yes is the IL-76 new or what? How many did IL-76-90A-3 pieces?
      2. +1
        6 March 2018 20: 15
        Then it’s better on the Mi 8 with a cabin under ViP and additional fuel tanks.
  36. +5
    6 March 2018 17: 11
    Quote: Sands Career General
    Oh oh oh(((

    I can’t even find the words. Eternal memory of the dead, to identify the perpetrators.

    Not to the topic, but we are not looking for the guilty, but switchmen sad all this is sad ...
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 17: 16
      Do you have it in the USA?
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 17: 24
        I'm a fan of the metallurgist, not yours hi
        1. 0
          6 March 2018 17: 32
          Novokuznetsk?
  37. +9
    6 March 2018 17: 12
    the deepest condolences to the families of the victims.
  38. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 13
    Condolences to the near and dear ones, Kingdom of Heaven!
  39. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 14
    Condolences and words of support to relatives and friends ... The second major plane crash in a month is probably no longer a coincidence and not an accident, but an indicator of major shortcomings (and I want to say complete sloppiness) in organizing the safety of air flights ...
  40. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 16
    Some kind of black streak ...
  41. +6
    6 March 2018 17: 17
    Something dofiga "non-combat" losses. Tu-154 with an ensemble, two with Kuznetsov at the bottom, Mi-24, now AN. In amers departures, I think no less, but do not fall. Apparently they are more professional chtoli?
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 17: 36
      Quote: Sebastian Pereira
      Apparently they are more professional chtoli?

      the level of development of our military technology is ahead of the personnel serving this equipment .. (
    2. +2
      6 March 2018 18: 26
      They also fall. Look at the information in the branch above, Lord Sith posted the specifics.
      It only annoys me that nothing is clear at all, and the Moscow Region already reports that there was no impact from the ground, and again the equipment failed. The next version will be the fault of the pilots. And this is their established practice. Since the fall of TU-154 with the Alexandrov ensemble on board, the conclusions of the commissions are somewhat vague.
      Here is the tragedy again. 32 people died. Remember them, men. And our deepest condolences to the family and friends.
  42. +3
    6 March 2018 17: 19
    Earth rest in peace! God grant that this happens as rarely as possible, so that we see off and meet our citizens alive! My condolences to all the relatives, colleagues and relatives of the victims!
  43. MMX
    +3
    6 March 2018 17: 20
    It’s hard to get such news.
    Rest in peace. Relatives and friends - the strength to survive the grief ...
  44. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 21
    land to them rest in peace
  45. +16
    6 March 2018 17: 22
    A nightmare of some kind. Mood spoiled root. I’ll go Natsik pi.zd-and-I (I’ll call my friends, although I’m already nearby), and whether that will be. And so the day began well ... Even from Kiev right now they will catch up, so are the young Nazis, but against the blood of others. Banderlogov They softly do not really like them. In this case, we are friends in the convoy. . The cops warned. All at a glance. Tomorrow News.
    1. +3
      6 March 2018 17: 38
      Quote: Fedorov
      A nightmare of some kind. Mood spoiled root. I’ll go Natsik pi.zd-and-I (I’ll call my friends, although I’m already nearby), and whether that will be. And so the day began well ... Even from Kiev right now they will catch up, so are the young Nazis, but against the blood of others. Banderlogov They softly do not really like them. In this case, we are friends in the convoy. . The cops warned. All at a glance. Tomorrow News.

      I would go with you, how did they get the banderlogs soldier .... Now rejoice on their Svidomo sites .. God judge them!
      Fedorov be careful there, don’t get caught ...
      1. +4
        6 March 2018 17: 53
        I will be quiet and neat. Everything is already a pipe covenant ....
    2. +2
      6 March 2018 17: 44
      Who about what, and crest about fat ...
  46. +6
    6 March 2018 17: 24
    Russia, in Syria, is losing more in disasters than in the fighting !!!! It's horrible!!
    rest in peace!!!

  47. +3
    6 March 2018 17: 25
    Everlasting memory(((((((((((((((
  48. +4
    6 March 2018 17: 25
    ..Let's be silent! .. Kingdom of heaven to them, rest in peace for them! Eternal memory to them!
  49. +6
    6 March 2018 17: 25
    Most likely shot down. Not so long ago, this base was attacked by militants with mortars and drones. Although the aircraft is old, it is quite reliable and simple, it can fly a lot with idle engines, land on any platform, well, if there are no African gibbons at the controls. Many people talk about metal fatigue, so why give out a certificate of airworthiness to an airplane that can collapse in the air at any time? Condolences to the families of the victims. May the souls of the dead find peace.
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 17: 48
      An armored car, and you are not allowed such an idea that the Defense Ministry has practically no new transporters? And it’s not the will to use what is
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 17: 51
        Here is the result, it turns out MO is not surprised by this tragedy.
    2. +3
      6 March 2018 19: 07
      I'm also more inclined to the version of the downing of the aircraft. Therefore, this version was immediately dismissed so as not to place a burden on the units of the Armed Forces, which are required to ensure the normal functioning of the base. And go look for the guilty one.
      It is unfortunate condolences to the near and dear ones. Earth in fluff. Ohhhh.
      In the end, someone must answer for the loss of life!
  50. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 29
    The kingdom of heaven to our soldiers. deep condolences to relatives and friends. I don’t want to say anything. We are waiting for the results of the commission.
  51. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 29
    everlasting memory!
  52. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 30
    May the earth be lighter than feathers to them! The kingdom of heaven to them!
  53. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 30
    Well, what's going on? The whole mood soured. Eternal memory to the dead.
  54. +9
    6 March 2018 17: 32
    My condolences to those who died..
    I think there were no ordinary passengers there, as in the case of the death of the Tu-134 with the ensemble of Alexandrov (flying to Syria) and other significant passengers..

    I am sure that again all this is not for nothing... May they rest in peace! We won't be intimidated...
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 17: 39
      May the earth rest in peace, and for all the blood shed by the Russians on the land of Syria, we do not even have to, but are obliged to establish a strong foothold there for centuries, destroying all the enemy’s evil spirits....
    2. +1
      6 March 2018 18: 43
      Do not confuse Tu-134 with Tu 154..
      1. +1
        6 March 2018 19: 18
        Quote: BASTA
        Do not confuse Tu-134 with Tu 154..

        I just flew a Tu-134 as a child, that’s the association...
        Then the tragedy with the Tu-154 happened..You are right, but that is not the point.
    3. +1
      6 March 2018 20: 09
      All were military, one general
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 20: 28
        Quote: FalconD
        All were military, one general

        There are different types of military men and generals too.... That is the question..? soldier
        1. 0
          6 March 2018 20: 35
          At least 31 servicemen of the Russian Army... is that clearer??
          1. 0
            6 March 2018 20: 42
            Quote: FalconD
            At least 31 servicemen of the Russian Army... is that clearer??

            No, it’s not clearer...There’s big politics going on here! Someone took revenge on Russia...
            1. 0
              6 March 2018 20: 48
              Anything is possible, but that’s not what this conversation is about...you can’t bring people back
  55. 0
    6 March 2018 17: 34
    We probably have the same number of aircraft crashes per year as in other countries.
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 17: 54
      Quote: Yak28
      We probably have the same number of aircraft crashes per year as in other countries.

      I should have kept quiet, at least today...
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 17: 56
        Why suddenly? Of course I feel sorry for people, but the fact that our planes crash more often than others is a fact that must be taken into account and draw conclusions
    2. +2
      6 March 2018 19: 09
      Yah! Exactly? Or just to write something? Does religion not allow you to Google?
      http://провэд.рф/article/24446-statistika-aviakat
      astpof-po-stpanam.html
      http://www.ruwings.ru/safety/country/
      https://ria.ru/society/20171230/1512002098.html
  56. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 39
    The kingdom of heaven and eternal memory.
  57. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 41
    “there was no fire impact on the An26”, suppose a semi-fantastic version - “sabotage”? I agree it sounds a little fantastic, but in principle this is possible.
  58. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 44
    Quote: MIKHAN
    My condolences to those who died..
    I think there were no ordinary passengers there, as in the case of the death of the Tu-134 with the ensemble of Alexandrov (flying to Syria) and other significant passengers..

    I am sure that again all this is not for nothing... May they rest in peace! We won't be intimidated...

    I agree with you: they won’t carry Vanya Pupkin on such flights
  59. 0
    6 March 2018 17: 45
    In our Ministry of Defense, old stuff will fly around until it collapses from old age?! Apparently so! Low bow to those who died for their deeds!
  60. 0
    6 March 2018 17: 50
    Quote: MMX
    It’s hard to get such news.
    Rest in peace. Relatives and friends - the strength to survive the grief ...

    It's not easy to go through something like this
  61. +3
    6 March 2018 17: 50
    The Lord has added to his squadron, the Kingdom of Heaven to the dead
  62. +5
    6 March 2018 17: 52
    Therefore, we are not surprised by the technical malfunction of the entire country. A classic of the genre.
    Only 3 months have passed in 2018 and already 2 planes have crashed. How it infuriates me.
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 20: 17
      Cars kill far more people than airplanes.
  63. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 52
    This is sad, my condolences to the families of the victims. It's hard to believe that those. malfunction, although on such an old plane this is not surprising. You should ask those who are "in the know"
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 17: 57
      Quote: Archivist Vasya
      This is sad, my condolences to the families of the victims. It's hard to believe that those. malfunction, although on such an old plane this is not surprising. You should ask those who are "in the know"

      They don’t fly junk cars to Syria... The experts will say they’re faulty, but I don’t BELIEVE them!
  64. 0
    6 March 2018 17: 53
    Eternal memory to the soldiers..... We mourn.... When will this all end....
  65. 0
    6 March 2018 17: 55
    who will tell the truth before the elections if this is someone’s malicious intent?
  66. +6
    6 March 2018 17: 56
    500 meters, this is after the passage of the BPRM. The height became about 50-30. But this is with a standard approach.
    And if they were playing Afghan, then... in short... you can’t say anything now.
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 18: 25
      Why would an Afghan be pawned? It’s unlikely... Until we have a complete picture, we will be in the dark.
    2. +5
      6 March 2018 18: 37
      Quote: shuravi
      500 meters, this is after the passage of the BPRM. The height became about 50-30. But this is with a standard approach.
      And if they were playing Afghan, then... in short... you can’t say anything now.

      Another option is wind shear. There are gusts of 12-25 knots. (Or rather, in Latakia, but these are neighbors).
      1. 0
        7 March 2018 14: 08
        Quote: Avis-bis

        Another option is wind shear. There are gusts of 12-25 knots. (Or rather, in Latakia, but these are neighbors).


        Not knots, but kilometers per hour. But even if there are knots, it’s still not much, 12,5 m/s.
        Not critical.
        1. +4
          7 March 2018 14: 36
          Quote: shuravi

          Not knots, but kilometers per hour

          What other "km/h"?
          Quote: shuravi
          METAR: OSLK 061400Z 16012G25KT

          And this is not used in “Russian” METARs: meters per second are there, km/h are not.
          This can be critical at such a height when the wind speed doubles. Or falls. Or (if the impulse) first rises and then falls.
          If you believe the witnesses, the plane was flying, hiding behind the roll and lead angle from a very strong sidewall (the deviation of the plane’s axis from the LZP and its roll were visible to the naked eye). In particular, if a gust arrives under one wing (there is the sea to the side of the glide path) (or, conversely, the wind has died down), then the result may well be disastrous.
  67. +2
    6 March 2018 17: 56
    Everlasting memory!
  68. +4
    6 March 2018 17: 58
    Eternal memory to the soldiers. Eternal glory. May God rest their souls...
  69. +4
    6 March 2018 17: 58
    Asymmetrical US response to Putin's speech? Do they have the technology to drop our old transport planes?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        7 March 2018 09: 42
        Quote: Heterosigma
        here technology is not needed, just let our junk continue to fly and everything will improve on its own

        Only a few planes fell due to old age. I don’t even remember the last cases when a plane crashed in Russia due to old age... 90% were pilot errors. Or rather, the lack of skills to act in an emergency situation. Therefore, the problem is not age, but the availability of training facilities. This is why they fall, not because of age.
  70. +3
    6 March 2018 17: 58
    Everlasting memory!!!
  71. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 08
    The kingdom of heaven is lost.
  72. +4
    6 March 2018 18: 10
    rest in peace .... 500 meters, even if the engines failed, it was possible to plan, something didn’t add up, 500 meters before the runway a malfunction occurred that did not allow the flight to be completed?
    1. +4
      6 March 2018 18: 39
      Quote: realist
      rest in peace .... 500 meters, even if the engines failed, it was possible to plan, something didn’t add up, 500 meters before the runway a malfunction occurred that did not allow the flight to be completed?

      For example, wind shear in speed and/or direction. The oncoming flow has sharply weakened or turned by several tens of degrees, and the height is small, so they sank.
      1. 0
        8 March 2018 08: 37
        even if the engines fail, the plane can glide (until the speed drops below landing speed), but what then? Did he lose speed faster than he should? Let's wait for the results of the investigation, but I'm afraid the answer will be vague
    2. +1
      6 March 2018 18: 48
      Quote: realist
      rest in peace .... 500 meters, even if the engines failed, it was possible to plan, something didn’t add up, 500 meters before the runway a malfunction occurred that did not allow the flight to be completed?



      Who told you that the problems STARTED 500 meters away?...They ended there, but probably started earlier
      1. 0
        7 March 2018 09: 43
        Quote: Town Hall
        Who told you that the problems STARTED 500 meters away?...They ended there, but probably started earlier

        Due to the lack of messages from the pilots.
        1. +4
          7 March 2018 10: 46
          Quote: Semen1972

          Due to the lack of messages from the pilots.

          And at such a height there is no time for reports: “pilot, navigate, report.” And not vice versa.
      2. 0
        8 March 2018 08: 38
        even if the engines fail, the plane can glide (until the speed drops below landing speed), but what then? Did he lose speed faster than he should? Let's wait for the results of the investigation, but I'm afraid the answer will be vague and will not suit us. although who will be interested...
    3. +3
      6 March 2018 18: 49
      It’s amazing... people who don’t understand aviation are not dumb, they start arguing - it’s ignorant! It’s sad!.. Such a tragedy, but there are still know-it-alls.
  73. 0
    6 March 2018 18: 13
    As experienced pilots say, the most dangerous time is 3 minutes after takeoff and 5 minutes before landing. Unfortunately, it seems to be the same situation.
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 18: 55
      The most dangerous thing... is when the flight crew is thrown out of the flight list, and a bunch of instructors and inspectors are written in instead! This is dangerous! Often everything ends tragically. The remaining fuel was most likely minimal. ((
  74. +2
    6 March 2018 18: 14
    The An-26 transport aircraft was produced in 1969 - 1986. The first flight took place in 1973. As a result of accidents and accidents, 142 aircraft of this type were lost, a total of 1403 units were produced. The aircraft is operated by dozens of countries, including as militaries.

    The WarGonzo Telegram channel, citing eyewitnesses, reports that on the day the An-26 plane crashed, there was a strong wind during landing at the Khmeimim airfield in Latakia.

    “The plane that crashed in Syria was already behaving abnormally during landing. Eyewitnesses told WarGonzo that it tilted very heavily and sat down “almost sideways.” They also noted that there was very strong wind in Latakia that day,” the report said.
  75. +4
    6 March 2018 18: 15
    I join in condolences to the victims...
  76. 0
    6 March 2018 18: 18
    There is a noticeable joyful revival among our Western and Middle Eastern partners. On the issue of the need to seek consensus with them
  77. The comment was deleted.
  78. 0
    6 March 2018 18: 21
    Some did not have time to sing the funeral service near Moscow, now others.....If not fire from the ground, again unprofessionalism?
  79. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 22
    Sadly. Sincere condolences to the relatives of the victims.
  80. +3
    6 March 2018 18: 24
    Like some kind of rock! Emergency situations always appear at moments of maximum laxity or maximum tension. But they have a special resonance at historical moments for the country.
    The death of compatriots is always imposed as part of a personal tragedy, and the general phrase “passengers” is somehow also alarming.
    Condolences to the family, unity and firmness to the rest!
  81. 0
    6 March 2018 18: 26
    No words! What kind of negligence is this, unprofessionalism or criminal intent? No words!
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 18: 29
      These planes are already 40 years old.
  82. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 30
    Nothing surprising. Aviation equipment must be periodically replaced with new ones, since even new equipment that did not work after decades begins to fall apart very quickly.
    Planes just don’t crash where they haven’t taken off for years, overgrown with weeds.
    To the pilots, crew and passengers, the Kingdom of Heaven.
  83. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 31
    I remember in the late 80s there was such garbage. Disaster after disaster
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +2
        6 March 2018 19: 37
        Could you calm down, or is incontinence tormenting you?!
    2. 0
      6 March 2018 19: 31
      Quote: syndicalist
      I remember in the late 80s there was such garbage. Disaster after disaster

      You are right and this greatly influenced the collapse of the USSR! I remember these terrible catastrophes and tragedies one after another (there was no Internet) Well, just like it all came together on purpose... Well, and then away we go hi
      The Russian people are compassionate, if they begin to regret something and look for “Who is to blame, and what to do..?” according to Chernyshevsky, Dostoevsky, etc. And the Russian revolt is bloody and merciless to the delight of the West and all scum (for quick enrichment)
      The West has studied our soul and wants to try this option again (like during the USSR, it was carried out brilliantly..) Well. Well, gentlemen...we are different now and have already understood a lot!
      And your “bloody tricks and provocations” only unite us even more strongly..
      And how angry they are, you can’t imagine what will happen to you.. negative
    3. +1
      6 March 2018 19: 37
      Quote: syndicalist
      I remember in the late 80s there was such garbage. Disaster after disaster




      It’s just that by the end of the 80s, disasters began to be hidden not as carefully as before
      1. 0
        6 March 2018 20: 00
        This has never happened before or since. Only “Nakhimov” and Asha are worth it!
        1. +4
          7 March 2018 10: 43
          Quote: syndicalist
          This has never happened before or since. Only “Nakhimov” and Asha are worth it!

          The most “catastrophic” time in the USSR/post-USSR was in the 1990s, especially the first half. Then it became easier. But not the 1980s.
  84. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 31
    Rest in peace! Everlasting memory...
  85. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 31
    What a pity guys, what a pity... Rest in peace Heroes.
  86. 0
    6 March 2018 18: 32
    Each aircraft has a limit on the maximum side and tail wind. Strong wind could cause
  87. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 34
    Quote: Vita VKO
    Suspiciously, a crash distance of 500 m to the strip. Very similar to a standard MANPADS shot at maximum range. Let's see the results of the investigation.


    Unfortunately, you may be right. The incident with the Su-25 confirmed that the Barmalei have MANPADS. And hiding with it unnoticed within a radius of 6-7 km from the base is more than realistic. If this turns out to be the case, then all aircraft will be potential targets.
  88. +3
    6 March 2018 18: 34
    If the weather was good (without a strong sideways motion), then there may be a balance imbalance (perhaps there was some kind of cargo that shifted closer to the ramp, or - if the approach was “Afghan style” - it means it reached critical angles and fell with a list? ??, in general, 500 meters before the runway, if something failed, the plane should have landed, let it “plow” - but it landed.
    Kingdom of heaven to all.
  89. +4
    6 March 2018 18: 37
    The fact that they were shot down is a big doubt. But if there was a report of strong winds, then that could very well be the reason. The same surface wind shear is an insidious thing, however.
    As for the An-26 itself, it’s a good plane. But this is not a machine that can be extended. In the army, the mane and tail are the same in all the garbage dumps. And the youngest of them is already 32.
    Under the USSR it was strict, quarters were sent to be cut up. And now it’s capitalism, damn it.
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 20: 21
      I agree with you, we have an12 in our division; in 2020 we are preparing to celebrate the anniversary - the hard worker will turn 50 years old. Currently 48 years old, and drives without taking it out.
    2. +4
      6 March 2018 21: 28
      Quote: shuravi

      Under the USSR it was strict, quarters were sent to be cut up. And now it’s capitalism, damn it.

      I wonder why not 10 years? Or not 20? Or 23, 37...
      It’s very strange to hear this from a Soviet pilot. The period of N years was determined on the basis of statistics and observations; in general, accumulation of experience. And for 25 years it didn’t appear out of nowhere. Initially (in the 1920s-40s) the calendar period was less than ten years, simply because of the materials used at that time. It was later extended to 25. And then they stopped. And not because of any objective considerations, but because of “as if something wouldn’t work out”, stagnation came to its full extent.
      The calendar does not indicate the reliability of the aircraft nothing. Nothing at all. During normal operation (technical and flight), the service life of the aircraft is infinity. Have the “damned bourgeoisie” lost many B-52s?
  90. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 40
    Quote: verner1967
    Once we rode on their wreckage

    Who are you?
  91. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 42
    Eternal Memory...Eternal Peace! What sad news...
  92. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 42
    My condolences to the family. The Kingdom of Heaven to the lost!
  93. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 54
    in 14, the Kamchatka Aviation Enterprise bought an AN-26 for 22 million rubles.
    And now, instead of spending money on a new plane, the Moscow Region will pay the 32 families who died a million each. (more likely)
    Result: 32 million + loss of the plane + grief and loss of compatriots, and reputational losses + payment for investigation specialists + all sorts of psychologists and so on. And the nature of the cargo is also unknown. Which I’m sure was also empty, such flights don’t fly at every opportunity, they try to do something throw it at the base. And the loss of experienced pilots.
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 20: 01
      Who told you that the Kamchadals bought a new plane? I wonder where they would have gotten it. For 22 million you can only buy a very worn one. In general, this plane is mega-reliable, you just need to master it properly, and then it will take you out. It forgives many mistakes, and moves along the glide path like an iron. The weather is most likely, if the crosswind was blowing strongly, he may have tried to correct the evasion and landed before the runway. Technical reason? Well, I don’t know, at such a distance only a sudden engine failure could lead to such consequences. There is, of course, an unpleasant feature of this type of aircraft: the landing approach is carried out at engine operating modes that are not protected by the automatic feathering system. And in case of failure, if the flight engineer does not manually feather the propeller from the KFL-37, negative thrust is realized on the autorotating propeller, the value of which can reach up to 4 tons. Plus, if you want to add a mode to a running engine, you first need to raise the flaps to 15, and only then give the gas, otherwise the plane will turn over. And if all this happens directly near the ground, it is very difficult to react correctly.
  94. +1
    6 March 2018 18: 59
    Today is my son’s birthday, the boy is 5 years old, the day started off so well for you too. My condolences, I’m very sorry for the people. Something bad begins, one day our “Annushka”, the duck, was poisoned, on the demarcation line in the DPR something very bad went wrong, and the horses announced the beginning of a new phase of the operation in the Donbass. I wish I could thicken it up.
  95. The comment was deleted.
    1. +4
      6 March 2018 19: 07
      Don't watch TV. Loop on the keyboard
      1. 0
        7 March 2018 16: 31
        I have to listen to it at work because people don’t read books. The TV doesn’t turn off.
  96. +5
    6 March 2018 19: 04
    I have no words! May the pilots rest in peace, eternal memory to the dead!
    I am writing and wiping away my tears! Rest in peace guys...
  97. 0
    6 March 2018 19: 05
    Who was flying is still unknown - condolences to the families of the victims.
    Is the IL-62 okay?
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 20: 10
      All military
  98. +1
    6 March 2018 19: 14
    Approach with a gradient. overestimated the capabilities. the Levashov crew fell down. sorry for the guys.
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 19: 28
      Quote: yura kharlamov
      Approach with a gradient. overestimated the capabilities. the Levashov crew fell down. sorry for the guys.


      Ours, St. Petersburg, therefore.
      Only in the army they don’t speak by gradient, but by turning at the calculated angle.
      1. +3
        6 March 2018 20: 18
        Shuravi, you are wrong. A flap approach at the design angle and an approach with a gradient are different concepts. A flap approach at the design angle is usually used with an exit to the drive or RSBN. Then, at the moment of passing any of these RNT, the crew (pilot) turns to the calculated angle and follows to the landing turn point (at a certain distance and at a certain azimuth), after which at this calculated point it turns to the landing course, after entering the PC performs landing approach. But the approach with a gradient is performed at a certain height and exits to the drive. After passing it, the crew performs a landing approach in a steep downward spiral with the calculated vertical speed and roll, and depending on the flight altitude, the number of turns is calculated in such a way as to complete the outermost turn with an exit to the PC and a height of 50-70 m (depending on the type of aircraft ). It is used mainly in BMC, as it is considered a visual approach. But the method of approaching with a lapel at the calculated angle just provides for an instrument approach using actuators, RSP and instrumental landing systems (SP or ILS).
  99. 0
    6 March 2018 19: 17
    Rest in peace. The Kingdom of heaven. Condolences.
  100. 0
    6 March 2018 19: 31
    In our army they speak with gradient
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 19: 57
      Quote: yura kharlamov
      In our army they speak with gradient


      Open any crew manual and look for the gradient there.
      In particular, for the An-26:
      4.3.3. Flap landing approach at design angle ...........................50
      1. +4
        6 March 2018 20: 31
        Quote: shuravi
        Quote: yura kharlamov
        In our army they speak with gradient


        Open any crew manual and look for the gradient there.
        In particular, for the An-26:
        4.3.3. Flap landing approach at design angle ...........................50

        You are talking about different things. "Gradient" refers to the angle of inclination of the trajectory - the glide path or, conversely, the climb; This is more likely from the “piloting” section. But the “calculated angle” is in the horizontal plane and, rather, a navigational question.
        1. +3
          6 March 2018 21: 14
          In general, the remark is correct. Let me add once again that an approach with the so-called “maximum descent gradient,” as it is correctly called, is not defined by any guidance document except for the KBP, and such an approach procedure is not in any API collection (for any airfield), strictly speaking “gradient” is not even defined as a method of landing approach (such a purely military trick, dictated by necessity), but the method of landing approach “with a lapel at the calculated angle” is also described in navigation textbooks, management documents, and so on. Almost all airfields have this method in their IPP. Generally speaking, there are 5 main approaches to landing.
          1. In a large box
          2. In a small box
          3. Two 180 turns.
          4. From the start of the decline.
          5. Turning at the calculated angle.
          There is also such a thing as a visual approach (by the way, this also includes an approach with a gradient), this is the first thing that a cadet is taught when learning line work. But that's another question. And if on topic, I personally don’t understand why it was necessary for him to enter with a gradient at the airfield, where the density of security both on the ground and in the sky is very high, air approach strips are constantly covered by helicopters and UAVs, especially when landing vehicles on the ground Security was especially strengthened after the New Year's shelling. I personally believe (but I don’t claim, of course) that the main reason was the mistake of the pilots (may they rest in peace) and not because they are not professionals, but simply because they were tired. Ours recently returned to the An30 from there - they say that there is just a forest - no one cares about the resource of both aircraft and crews, there are a huge number of tasks, there is no such concept as “combat tension”, sometimes they fly for days without rest, despite the standards determined by the FAPPP GA, Moreover, they don’t allow you to rest in the evenings either; policemen and others are constantly roaming around, always looking for drunks. People plow to exhaustion and take turns sleeping at the helm. So it goes. I don’t believe too much about the technical malfunction yet (although I don’t deny it), I just don’t understand what has to happen for an An26 plane to crash between the near and the end - only a failure of two engines or a failure of control, two engines at once - unlikely, control - it’s all on traction and rocking chairs (this is not the Tu22M3, for example), it’s hard to imagine that something broke there. Next, the hydraulic system, the plane is on landing, the landing gear and mechanization are completely extended, and the hydraulic control is not tied to the control, it is direct, therefore even its failure will not affect the landing in any way (after landing, yes, after all, you need to slow down with something), the rest are special cases are insignificant to lead to disaster. At an altitude of 20-30 meters, no one will pay attention to either the failure of the course, or the failure of aneroid-membrane devices, AGD, etc., all this is no longer necessary. Guys, don’t think, I’m in no way blasphemous, winged brothers and brothers in arms died, it’s always very painful to take such news, I just want to somehow more or less try to understand the reason, because if it was a mistake and it was provoked by a banal lack of sleep due to endless tasks, then here it is already necessary to seriously think about organizing post-flight rest for pilots. Has anyone forgotten about Su24? The guys took off on wing 69 and the reason was the extreme workload on the crews and the lack of normal conditions for rest.
          1. +2
            6 March 2018 21: 21
            As a result, a wonderful crew, professionals, real men, died, and the reason was a violation of the rules for operating aircraft. So it may be here too - the crew commander, Major Smirnov, 96, 21 years at the helm, 1st class pilot, they write that he is an extra-pilot, so I am sure that such a person can come out of any special situation with honor. And then I could simply lose control from fatigue. Plus, they wrote above from Israel that the weather there was bad, as an option, I found myself in difficult conditions, lost control over the parameters...... And then everyone knows everything. Once again, this is just an opinion, I do not claim to be the ultimate truth. May the sky rest in peace to the dead
          2. +1
            6 March 2018 22: 43
            The failure of both engines at such an altitude is not as dangerous as the failure of one. Remember the two An-24 crashes in Bugulma, early 80s. In both cases, one engine failed after the flaps were extended to 38 degrees. In both cases, DAF failure due to ICM. The propeller is in autorotation mode, negative thrust. The crews did not have time to do anything. Another disaster that comes to mind is, it seems, in Kurgan. The same failure, the crew began a go-around, but before setting the takeoff mode, the flaps were set to 15 degrees. didn't remove it. The plane drifted into the aircraft parking lot along the runway. Remember also the disaster at the Leshukonskoye airport, during the approach with a cross wind, the pilot tried to correct the lateral deviation by “giving a leg”, due to which the plane landed with a slide and a large vertical overload, and collapsed. I don’t understand a little what the working time standards from the Federal Aviation Rules of Civil Aviation have to do with it, the plane is military.
            1. +3
              7 March 2018 03: 09
              GA - state aviation, this is our main book, citizens do not use it☝. It just stipulates the norms for flying hours and rest. It’s clear that war is a special matter, and yet I still think the infantry should sometimes read aviation documents
    2. 0
      6 March 2018 20: 21
      There is a critical shortage of BTA aircraft in our army.